AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered at https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=33904.0
Corrected several already and appreciate your patience as we work through the rest.

Author Topic: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro  (Read 5508 times)

ibthebigd

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 263
  • Location: US
  • Last Login: Today at 01:14:17 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #25 on: July 31, 2023, 05:25:11 AM »

I wonder what the area would be like if they built 1 large airport between Austin and San Antonio and say Delta had built a hub there.

SM-G996U

Logged

thisdj78

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 514
  • Age: 45
  • Location: Texas
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 10:21:06 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #26 on: July 31, 2023, 05:22:17 PM »

I wonder what the area would be like if they built 1 large airport between Austin and San Antonio and say Delta had built a hub there.

SM-G996U

I watched the documentary and sounds like the window has passed on a large joint international airport. But I could see a 3rd national/regional airport there….they could just expand New Braunfel’s existing airport to accommodate commercial traffic. Similar to what was done with Sanford Airport near Orlando, which is now a base for Allegiant Airlines.
Logged

Bobby5280

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4254
  • Location: Lawton, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 12:32:45 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #28 on: August 08, 2023, 01:14:21 PM »

There is a good bit of anti-highways drivel in that article. They bring up the "failure" of Houston's $3 billion Katy Freeway expansion (traffic is even worse now than ever) without mentioning important factors. The Houston metro is continuing to see rapid population growth which equals more vehicles on local highways. Then there is the terrible design of the surface street grid across much of the metro. No access controls at all. Every driveway, side street, etc just empties out directly onto main arterials. Conflict ensues. Traffic jams on the freeways can actually be caused by gridlock taking place down on the surface streets next to the freeways. But let's build some damned bike paths to solve the f***king problem!! Morons.

Like it or not, all the major highways going in, out and around the Austin-San Antonio megapolis will need to be upgraded and expanded. The upgrades will be critical if the forecast claiming that region will double in population by 2040 comes true. That would be over 10 million people. There's already over 5 million in that region now. Not only will the highways need serious attention, but so will many of the surface streets. Major surface arterials move traffic far better when traffic signals are spaced far apart and access to lesser side streets and driveways are cut off or at least greatly limited. There has to be at least some traffic filtering on the surface street level. We see some of this design in much newer suburban developments. Houston has been a big city for so long you pretty much have to drive clear out to The Woodlands to see any such street design.

They can try building light rail and commuter rail service in the Austin-San Antonio megapolis. Doing so costs so damned much money and will only offer limited benefits. That's because the region is so spread out and was built with personal motor vehicles in mind. The combo of rail travel and walking works in very few places in the US. It doesn't even work everywhere in Europe either.
Logged

GaryV

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3737
  • Location: Southeast Michigan
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 07:10:05 PM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #29 on: August 08, 2023, 03:46:31 PM »

I see ASA and I'm back in high school geometry studying congruent triangles.
Logged

Finrod

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 335
  • Age: 55
  • Location: Atlanta GA
  • Last Login: March 14, 2024, 11:35:59 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #30 on: August 08, 2023, 11:05:59 PM »

San Austinio?

Could just go with San Austin, or San AntAustin?  The latter looks silly but seems easy to say.
Logged
Internet member since 1987.

Hate speech is a nonsense concept; the truth is hate speech to those that hate the truth.

People who use their free speech to try to silence others' free speech are dangerous fools.

Road Hog

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2553
  • Location: Collin County, TX
  • Last Login: Today at 02:15:33 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #31 on: August 09, 2023, 06:03:08 AM »

Longhornland?
Logged

thisdj78

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 514
  • Age: 45
  • Location: Texas
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 10:21:06 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #32 on: August 09, 2023, 08:29:59 AM »

Balcones Metroplex (I think I may like this one better than my first suggestion of Central Texas Metroplex)
or Hill Country Metroplex (though the words country and metroplex together is an oxymoron)
Logged

1

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 14615
  • Age: 25
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 09:41:17 PM
    • Flickr account
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #33 on: August 09, 2023, 08:36:32 AM »

(though the words country and metroplex together is an oxymoron)

Different definition of "country", but isn't this what Singapore and the adjacent land in Malaysia are?
Logged
Clinched, minus I-93 (I'm missing a few miles and my file is incorrect)

Traveled, plus US 13, 44, and 50, and several state routes

I will be in Burlington VT for the eclipse.

StogieGuy7

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 560
  • Location: Kenosha area, WI
  • Last Login: March 15, 2024, 10:50:03 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #34 on: August 09, 2023, 09:44:58 AM »

Balcones Metroplex (I think I may like this one better than my first suggestion of Central Texas Metroplex)
or Hill Country Metroplex (though the words country and metroplex together is an oxymoron)

That's all fun stuff, but it's never going to be like D/FW because Austin and SA are each distinct metropolitan areas each with their own center and their own culture. They may blend together and, in that respect, form a "megalopolis" but it won't be like the "Metroplex" which is - in essence - a single huge metropolitan area. Think more like New York/Philly or Chicago/Milwaukee or LA/San Diego.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2023, 09:49:35 AM by StogieGuy7 »
Logged

jgb191

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 782
  • My favorite Interstate!

  • Age: 44
  • Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
  • Last Login: March 15, 2024, 05:49:17 PM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #35 on: August 09, 2023, 11:24:53 AM »

More than eighty miles separates Austin and San Antonio.  Maybe similar distance to those of Oakland and Sacramento, Philadelphia and Newark, Denver and CO Springs, Chicago and Milwaukee, and Orlando and Tampa.  Correct me if I'm way off on those pairings.

I like the idea of each city having its own airport instead of a shared airport.  Although if they were to share the same airport, their combined passenger numbers would be approaching those numbers at IAH and SFO putting it in the top 15 busiest; it would also be the busiest non-hub airport in the nation (should Delta add a hub in the hypothetically combined airport that would easily make it among the top ten busiest).
Logged
We're so far south that we're not even considered "The South"

ethanhopkin14

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2175
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: November 20, 2023, 08:50:23 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #36 on: August 09, 2023, 03:01:55 PM »

Balcones Metroplex (I think I may like this one better than my first suggestion of Central Texas Metroplex)
or Hill Country Metroplex (though the words country and metroplex together is an oxymoron)

That's all fun stuff, but it's never going to be like D/FW because Austin and SA are each distinct metropolitan areas each with their own center and their own culture. They may blend together and, in that respect, form a "megalopolis" but it won't be like the "Metroplex" which is - in essence - a single huge metropolitan area. Think more like New York/Philly or Chicago/Milwaukee or LA/San Diego.

My only rebuttal is that Dallas and Fort Worth are very different culturally.  Dallas is still big money, real estate and insurance, high paced and now jumping on the trend of being a playground for trust fund babies while Fort Worth still seems to cling to their cow town past.  Sure, there is a bit of both in each, but as for a whole, Dallas and Fort Worth have always felt like two distinct cities, not satellite versions of each other. 
Logged

Bobby5280

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4254
  • Location: Lawton, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 12:32:45 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #37 on: August 10, 2023, 02:26:43 PM »

There are numerous examples of Binary Cities in the US. Minneapolis-St Paul, Davenport-Moline, Midland-Odessa, Gulfport-Biloxi, Tampa-St Petersburg, Allentown-Bethlehem, etc.

Dallas-Fort Worth are technically still binary cities (even with their own separate skyscraper skylines), but the DFW metroplex is a bit unique for how so many of its "suburbs" have turned into cities. Arlington, Irving, Garland, etc all feel very urban now. I think the SF Bay Area is the only other multi-city region in the US that is comparable. But growth in the Bay Area is somewhat limited by geographic features (not to mention horribly high living costs). The DFW metroplex still has lots of room grow. The metroplex will likely pass the 8 million mark in population before 2030.
Logged

ethanhopkin14

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2175
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Austin, TX
  • Last Login: November 20, 2023, 08:50:23 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #38 on: August 10, 2023, 02:31:09 PM »

There are numerous examples of Binary Cities in the US. Minneapolis-St Paul, Davenport-Moline, Midland-Odessa, Gulfport-Biloxi, Tampa-St Petersburg, Allentown-Bethlehem, etc.

Dallas-Fort Worth are technically still binary cities (even with their own separate skyscraper skylines), but the DFW metroplex is a bit unique for how so many of its "suburbs" have turned into cities. Arlington, Irving, Garland, etc all feel very urban now. I think the SF Bay Area is the only other multi-city region in the US that is comparable. But growth in the Bay Area is somewhat limited by geographic features (not to mention horribly high living costs). The DFW metroplex still has lots of room grow. The metroplex will likely pass the 8 million mark in population before 2030.

Then you have Rio Grande Valley that is like a continuous stream of suburbs with no anchor cities. 
Logged

Bobby5280

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4254
  • Location: Lawton, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 12:32:45 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #39 on: August 11, 2023, 04:14:18 PM »

I don't think many Americans realize more than a million people live in that cluster of small cities in the South end of Texas.
Logged

Stephane Dumas

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2766
  • Last Login: March 18, 2024, 08:08:03 PM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #40 on: August 12, 2023, 01:07:48 PM »

Balcones Metroplex (I think I may like this one better than my first suggestion of Central Texas Metroplex)
or Hill Country Metroplex (though the words country and metroplex together is an oxymoron)

How about "Balconeplex" or Balconplex, depending of the spelling? ^_^;
Logged

jgb191

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 782
  • My favorite Interstate!

  • Age: 44
  • Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
  • Last Login: March 15, 2024, 05:49:17 PM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #41 on: August 12, 2023, 05:33:42 PM »

I don't think many Americans realize more than a million people live in that cluster of small cities in the South end of Texas.

Hidalgo County alone is approaching a million; plus if you add Cameron, Willacy, and Starr Counties, the RGV area totals up to almost 1.4 million.
Logged
We're so far south that we're not even considered "The South"

US 89

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 6250
  • Your friendly neighborhood meteorologist

  • Location: Tallahassee, FL
  • Last Login: February 23, 2024, 09:23:28 AM
    • Utah Highways
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #42 on: August 12, 2023, 05:51:13 PM »

There are numerous examples of Binary Cities in the US. Minneapolis-St Paul, Davenport-Moline, Midland-Odessa, Gulfport-Biloxi, Tampa-St Petersburg, Allentown-Bethlehem, etc.

Dallas-Fort Worth are technically still binary cities (even with their own separate skyscraper skylines), but the DFW metroplex is a bit unique for how so many of its "suburbs" have turned into cities. Arlington, Irving, Garland, etc all feel very urban now. I think the SF Bay Area is the only other multi-city region in the US that is comparable. But growth in the Bay Area is somewhat limited by geographic features (not to mention horribly high living costs). The DFW metroplex still has lots of room grow. The metroplex will likely pass the 8 million mark in population before 2030.

Seattle-Tacoma is pretty comparable. Bellevue is a "suburb" type city with its own high-rise skyline.

Bobby5280

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4254
  • Location: Lawton, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 12:32:45 AM
Re: San Antonio-Austin Mega Metro
« Reply #43 on: August 13, 2023, 01:27:48 AM »

The Seattle-Tacoma region is a legitimately large binary city metro. But like the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose region additional growth is limited by geography. Living costs aren't as high as the Bay Area, but they're still pretty high. The DFW metroplex has had the advantage of a whole lot of wide open territory ready for additional development. If housing costs grew too expensive in one area there would always be other more affordable areas where newly arriving residents could choose to live. That's how the DFW turned into the 4th biggest metro area in the US. In current trends continue the DFW metroplex will eventually pass Chicagoland to be the 3rd most populous metro in the US.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.