Thank you for your patience during the Forum downtime while we upgraded the software. Welcome back and see this thread for some new features and other changes to the forum.
Quote from: TheStranger on Today at 01:43:59 AMQuote from: jdunlop on April 24, 2024, 08:42:15 PMFHWA requires full movement at all Interstate interchanges (with very few exceptions) hence the redundant ramps.
Is this something introduced in the last 15-20 years, in which the interstate-to-interstate connection must include direct ramps between all directions?
I ask this because I can think of many interstate-to-interstate junctions that don't have this, usually a bypass route and its parent (i.e. for a California example, I-405 and I-5 at both ends in Sylmar and Irvine respectively, in which Route 118 and Route 133 serve the missing movements nearby).
There are some examples of Interstate-to-interstate in North Carolina that do not have this:
I-40/former I-85 (US 29) in Greensboro, in which the missing 85 north to 40 west move was covered by US 220. Junction was built when both routes were Interstates, before the Greensboro urban loop/I-840 happened
I-285/I-85 in Lexington, grandfathered in as I-285 was not originally interstate. Standard Y junction
I-40/I-840/I-85 in eastern Greensboro, I-40 east from the Death Valley section does not have any ramp to 85 south
I-795 and I-587, though the Interstate designations came after both freeways were originally constructed.
Quote from: Molandfreak on April 23, 2024, 08:42:45 PMRaymond Road is such a random-ass place to have the first traffic light since Dubuque. I can forgive not replacing the SPUI at the beltline. At least that makes some sense to permanently end the expressway there even if it's not what I'd rather see, but really at a road that isn't even on the NHS?It is the new crash hot spot in the city. I don't go that way daily or anything, but even I've seen at least two crashes there in the last year. Both looked like rear-enders.
Quote from: D-Dey65 on Today at 09:08:07 AMDoes anybody know anything about the feud between "AAARoads" and "Horse Eye's Back" on Wikipedia? Because "Horse Eye's Back" is tagging a lot of articles as not meeting the General Notability Guidelines, even lists of roads.What does the third A stand for?
Quote from: splashflash on April 24, 2024, 09:30:51 AMThe design for an interchange was completed four years ago for Pierce Ferry RoadMay have mentioned this before, but quite bizarre. The idea to build a "half interchange", instead on building the whole thing at once. Is that what "T1" stands for, a half assed attempt? Seems stupid to get a contract let again, spend more later, get a contractor out to the remote site again, later, to build the rest of the interchange when they feel like it. Almost seems as if Pete Rahn has his grimy hands into the design. At least no skewing or shifting of mainllines appears present.
https://azdot.gov/planning/transportation-studies/us-93-pierce-ferry-road-feasibility-study
Quote from: TheGrassGuy on March 27, 2023, 11:11:12 PM
"cookie monster expressway"