Unique, Odd, or Interesting Signs aka The good, the bad, and the ugly

Started by mass_citizen, December 04, 2013, 10:46:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

hotdogPi

Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 44, 50
MA 22, 40, 107, 109, 117, 119, 126, 141, 159
NH 27, 111A(E); CA 133; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316


jakeroot

Or perhaps "Cvres"

As in "Virginia is for losers". 😋

Harvestman

Quote from: 1 on June 20, 2021, 06:53:03 PM
Quote from: US 89 on June 20, 2021, 06:52:28 PM
C❤️RES.

cores

Kinda like those Jeep spare tire covers with paw prints in place of the "e"s.  I always read 'em as Joop.

roadman65

Usually only metric usage on signs use decimals. This one in Steele City, FL uses point five instead of one half.

Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe


ClassicHasClass

I put that in the same category as street sign blades for cul-de-sacs that are visible but you can't actually get to from the "intersecting" road.

hbelkins



Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

Occidental Tourist


ClassicHasClass


Scott5114

Quote from: jakeroot on June 22, 2021, 02:21:05 AM
Or perhaps "Cvres"

As in "Virginia is for losers". 😋

I actually had this all Photoshopped up and ready to post the next time a certain poster here started his next wave of Virginia jingoism, but he seems to have vanished for the time being.

uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

hbelkins

Quote from: Scott5114 on June 24, 2021, 01:52:37 AM
Quote from: jakeroot on June 22, 2021, 02:21:05 AM
Or perhaps "Cvres"

As in "Virginia is for losers". 😋

I actually had this all Photoshopped up and ready to post the next time a certain poster here started his next wave of Virginia jingoism, but he seems to have vanished for the time being.



Maybe he's on vacation in Pittsburgh...


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

Bruce

While I don't think any tall vehicles would take this road (there's a covered bridge nearby that is 11' 3", this is still a bit odd:


Scott5114

Some sort of protected area, I'm guessing? In most cases, the solution would be to remove the limb.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

Max Rockatansky

Numerous G28-1 California Spades being used as reassurance shields on CA 43:

43CAb by Max Rockatansky, on Flickr

43CAh by Max Rockatansky, on Flickr

43CAi by Max Rockatansky, on Flickr

tolbs17


Big John

^^I was thinking it is a short ramp with a hidden signal.


jakeroot

Quote from: tolbs17 on June 26, 2021, 01:34:43 AM
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.4348194,-78.0689333,3a,44.5y,319.58h,90.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYRepr4mXW1e3OF5CA8bQUQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

confusing cause the lines are dotted.

Can't quite tell if that's trying to encourage zipper merging or not.

Certainly double-solid white lines would be better. And/or a different sign, such as "do not change lanes" or "stay in lane".

roadfro

Quote from: jakeroot on June 26, 2021, 12:37:03 PM
Quote from: tolbs17 on June 26, 2021, 01:34:43 AM
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.4348194,-78.0689333,3a,44.5y,319.58h,90.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYRepr4mXW1e3OF5CA8bQUQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

confusing cause the lines are dotted.

Can't quite tell if that's trying to encourage zipper merging or not.

Certainly double-solid white lines would be better. And/or a different sign, such as "do not change lanes" or "stay in lane".

Not even sure what those signs are trying to accomplish in the first place. The two lanes merge down to one lane not too far past this point before the ramp joins the road below, so a regulation to not pass or to stay in lane isn't really advisable in this case.
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

JoePCool14

Quote from: roadfro on June 26, 2021, 10:22:36 PM
Quote from: jakeroot on June 26, 2021, 12:37:03 PM
Quote from: tolbs17 on June 26, 2021, 01:34:43 AM
https://www.google.com/maps/@35.4348194,-78.0689333,3a,44.5y,319.58h,90.19t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYRepr4mXW1e3OF5CA8bQUQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

confusing cause the lines are dotted.

Can't quite tell if that's trying to encourage zipper merging or not.

Certainly double-solid white lines would be better. And/or a different sign, such as "do not change lanes" or "stay in lane".

Not even sure what those signs are trying to accomplish in the first place. The two lanes merge down to one lane not too far past this point before the ramp joins the road below, so a regulation to not pass or to stay in lane isn't really advisable in this case.

They probably didn't want cars trying to speed up to pass one another before the merge, for fear of them not making the curve without crashing. But that's stupid. There's plenty of situations like this that don't warrant that signage. And even then, "Stay in Lane" and a solid white line would be much more appropriate for conveying that message.

:) Needs more... :sombrero: Not quite... :bigass: Perfect.
JDOT: We make the world a better place to drive.
Travel Mapping | 60+ Clinches | 260+ Traveled | 8000+ Miles Logged

J N Winkler

Quote from: JoePCool14 on June 27, 2021, 09:19:20 AMThey probably didn't want cars trying to speed up to pass one another before the merge, for fear of them not making the curve without crashing. But that's stupid. There's plenty of situations like this that don't warrant that signage. And even then, "Stay in Lane" and a solid white line would be much more appropriate for conveying that message.

In context, this looks to me like a state-specific signing treatment intended to convey "Do not rush to cut off someone in the right lane."  "Stay In Lane" and a solid white line would not be appropriate because traffic in the right-hand lane does need to change out of it before it tapers off.
"It is necessary to spend a hundred lire now to save a thousand lire later."--Piero Puricelli, explaining the need for a first-class road system to Benito Mussolini

jakeroot

So, it's basically just a nanny sign. Typical.

Don't tell me when I have to merge. I'll merge at the taper if I damn well please.

tolbs17

Makes no fucking sense at all. The southern end of the bypass in Ayden doesn't have them.

Scott5114

Quote from: jakeroot on June 27, 2021, 01:14:43 PM
Don't tell me when I have to merge. I'll merge at the taper if I damn well please.

Except in Oklahoma, of course, where it is (was?) illegal to merge at the taper.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

jakeroot

Quote from: Scott5114 on June 27, 2021, 11:19:49 PM
Quote from: jakeroot on June 27, 2021, 01:14:43 PM
Don't tell me when I have to merge. I'll merge at the taper if I damn well please.

Except in Oklahoma, of course, where it is (was?) illegal to merge at the taper.

Yeah, thankfully that's a "was".



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.