News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.

Main Menu

Maryland

Started by Alps, May 22, 2011, 12:10:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

BrianP

#2000
It's doubtful that anything is done to that interchange.  Since they recently rehabbed replaced the superstructure of the bridges in the interchange.  The worst part is they didn't improve them.  So they are still substandard due to a lack of shoulders.  I would have combined the two bridges in each direction to add space for at least some kind of increase in shoulder width or even combine all four bridges into one bridge.


ARMOURERERIC

Which 2 loop ramps have the highest ADT

Dirt Roads

Quote from: noelbotevera on February 14, 2021, 06:18:42 PM
Interested in how they'll tackle the I-70 interchange because it is a mess.

Quote from: TheOneKEA on February 19, 2021, 06:57:53 PM
My expectation is that two of the highest-utilized loop ramps will be replaced with flyovers.

Quote from: ARMOURERERIC on February 22, 2021, 08:44:52 PM
Which 2 loop ramps have the highest ADT

Don't know if it is the highest ADT loop ramp, but the ramp from northbound I-81 to westbound I-70 carries a significant portion of Northwest Virginia traffic towards Cumberland, Morgantown and Pittsburgh (and perhaps other points southwest).  I've always preferred VA-37 to US-522 (or my favorite VA-37 to VA/WV-127 to WV-29 to WV-9/MD-51).  A flyover for this ramp would be highly justified.

mcmc

#2003
About a year ago, the cloverleaf loop from US 29 northbound to MD-175/Little Patuxent Parkway westbound was closed and replaced with a partial cloverleaf, with a traffic light at the end of the ramp. This is in Columbia.

For the life of me, I can't figure out why SHA would want to make the interchange less elegant and (seemingly) less efficient. Anyone have any idea what the logic is?

US 29 at MD-175 on Google Maps:
https://www.google.com/maps/search/us+29+at+md+175/@39.2260909,-76.848221,1197m/data=!3m1!1e3


1995hoo

Reducing the weave areas, maybe? Merriweather Post Pavilion is at the next interchange south of there and Little Patuxent Parkway is one of the routes traffic leaving the venue uses, especially northbound, which is the direction whose access is expedited by closing that loop. The movement that loop ramp carried seems like it ought to carry less traffic overall just based on where the roads go.
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

mcmc

Quote from: 1995hoo on February 23, 2021, 08:53:41 PM
Merriweather Post Pavilion is at the next interchange south of there and Little Patuxent Parkway is one of the routes traffic leaving the venue uses, especially northbound, which is the direction whose access is expedited by closing that loop.
Good hunch, but I don't think that's it. The ramp in question leads straight back to Merriweather; no traffic exiting Merriweather would take that exit.

Is anyone privy to SHA's thinking? Was the cloverleaf in bad shape or somehow considered substandard?

Alps

The weave issue is likely on 29, is my guess.

1995hoo

Quote from: mcmc on February 23, 2021, 09:16:01 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on February 23, 2021, 08:53:41 PM
Merriweather Post Pavilion is at the next interchange south of there and Little Patuxent Parkway is one of the routes traffic leaving the venue uses, especially northbound, which is the direction whose access is expedited by closing that loop.
Good hunch, but I don't think that's it. The ramp in question leads straight back to Merriweather; no traffic exiting Merriweather would take that exit.

Is anyone privy to SHA's thinking? Was the cloverleaf in bad shape or somehow considered substandard?

What I meant is that by closing the loop exit from Route 29, traffic coming from Merriweather heading onto northbound 29 doesn't have any weave area to back up the traffic.
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

Bitmapped

Quote from: mcmc on February 23, 2021, 09:16:01 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on February 23, 2021, 08:53:41 PM
Merriweather Post Pavilion is at the next interchange south of there and Little Patuxent Parkway is one of the routes traffic leaving the venue uses, especially northbound, which is the direction whose access is expedited by closing that loop.
Good hunch, but I don't think that's it. The ramp in question leads straight back to Merriweather; no traffic exiting Merriweather would take that exit.

Is anyone privy to SHA's thinking? Was the cloverleaf in bad shape or somehow considered substandard?

Converting cloverleafs to parclos is pretty common. SHA has done it elsewhere (like I-270 at MD 85) as have other agencies (I-376 at US 22/US 30/PA 60 near Pittsburgh, I-81 at US 33 in Harrisonburg, VA, I-70 at OH 79 near Buckeye Lake, OH). Removing one of the inner loops often results in better traffic flow on the main route since it eliminates weaving.

froggie

Quote from: Dirt Roads on February 22, 2021, 09:36:55 PM
Quote from: ARMOURERERIC on February 22, 2021, 08:44:52 PM
Which 2 loop ramps have the highest ADT

Don't know if it is the highest ADT loop ramp, but the ramp from northbound I-81 to westbound I-70 carries a significant portion of Northwest Virginia traffic towards Cumberland, Morgantown and Pittsburgh (and perhaps other points southwest).  I've always preferred VA-37 to US-522 (or my favorite VA-37 to VA/WV-127 to WV-29 to WV-9/MD-51).  A flyover for this ramp would be highly justified.

Believe it or not, but per 2019 SHA data, that particular loop is the LEAST used loop at the 70/81 interchange.

The busiest loop, by far, is the SB 81 to EB 70 loop, followed by the WB 70 to SB 81 loop.

Alps

Quote from: froggie on February 23, 2021, 11:29:56 PM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on February 22, 2021, 09:36:55 PM
Quote from: ARMOURERERIC on February 22, 2021, 08:44:52 PM
Which 2 loop ramps have the highest ADT

Don't know if it is the highest ADT loop ramp, but the ramp from northbound I-81 to westbound I-70 carries a significant portion of Northwest Virginia traffic towards Cumberland, Morgantown and Pittsburgh (and perhaps other points southwest).  I've always preferred VA-37 to US-522 (or my favorite VA-37 to VA/WV-127 to WV-29 to WV-9/MD-51).  A flyover for this ramp would be highly justified.

Believe it or not, but per 2019 SHA data, that particular loop is the LEAST used loop at the 70/81 interchange.

The busiest loop, by far, is the SB 81 to EB 70 loop, followed by the WB 70 to SB 81 loop.

Makes the most sense to convert the least used one into the left turn, from a traffic standpoint. That suggests closing off the weave was more of a safety concern than a volume issue.

noelbotevera

#2011
Quote from: BrianP on February 22, 2021, 09:34:24 AM
It's doubtful that anything is done to that interchange.  Since they recently rehabbed replaced the superstructure of the bridges in the interchange.  The worst part is they didn't improve them.  So they are still substandard due to a lack of shoulders.  I would have combined the two bridges in each direction to add space for at least some kind of increase in shoulder width or even combine all four bridges into one bridge.
Eh. If MDSHA wants to 6-lane I-81, they have to fix that interchange; there's not enough room to add another lane. This interchange isn't helped by the fact that exit 5 is so close by; a possible solution would be C/D lanes between exits 4 and 5 with striping favoring a merge onto I-81.
Pleased to meet you
Hope you guessed my name

(Recently hacked. A human operates this account now!)

Bitmapped

Quote from: Alps on February 23, 2021, 11:32:30 PM
Quote from: froggie on February 23, 2021, 11:29:56 PM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on February 22, 2021, 09:36:55 PM
Quote from: ARMOURERERIC on February 22, 2021, 08:44:52 PM
Which 2 loop ramps have the highest ADT

Don't know if it is the highest ADT loop ramp, but the ramp from northbound I-81 to westbound I-70 carries a significant portion of Northwest Virginia traffic towards Cumberland, Morgantown and Pittsburgh (and perhaps other points southwest).  I've always preferred VA-37 to US-522 (or my favorite VA-37 to VA/WV-127 to WV-29 to WV-9/MD-51).  A flyover for this ramp would be highly justified.

Believe it or not, but per 2019 SHA data, that particular loop is the LEAST used loop at the 70/81 interchange.

The busiest loop, by far, is the SB 81 to EB 70 loop, followed by the WB 70 to SB 81 loop.

Makes the most sense to convert the least used one into the left turn, from a traffic standpoint. That suggests closing off the weave was more of a safety concern than a volume issue.

You're confusing two completely different interchanges. I-70/I-81 is still a full cloverleaf with C/D lanes. The one that was changed to a parclo was on US 29.

MASTERNC

Quote from: froggie on February 23, 2021, 11:29:56 PM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on February 22, 2021, 09:36:55 PM
Quote from: ARMOURERERIC on February 22, 2021, 08:44:52 PM
Which 2 loop ramps have the highest ADT

Don't know if it is the highest ADT loop ramp, but the ramp from northbound I-81 to westbound I-70 carries a significant portion of Northwest Virginia traffic towards Cumberland, Morgantown and Pittsburgh (and perhaps other points southwest).  I've always preferred VA-37 to US-522 (or my favorite VA-37 to VA/WV-127 to WV-29 to WV-9/MD-51).  A flyover for this ramp would be highly justified.

Believe it or not, but per 2019 SHA data, that particular loop is the LEAST used loop at the 70/81 interchange.

The busiest loop, by far, is the SB 81 to EB 70 loop, followed by the WB 70 to SB 81 loop.


I would have thought EB to NB would have been one of the more popular ones as a cut up to the PA Turnpike and the Northeast (bypassing I-95)

NJRoadfan

Even the world's first cloverleaf got converted to a parclo.

MillTheRoadgeek

Quote from: Bitmapped on February 23, 2021, 10:23:03 PM
Quote from: mcmc on February 23, 2021, 09:16:01 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on February 23, 2021, 08:53:41 PM
Merriweather Post Pavilion is at the next interchange south of there and Little Patuxent Parkway is one of the routes traffic leaving the venue uses, especially northbound, which is the direction whose access is expedited by closing that loop.
Good hunch, but I don't think that's it. The ramp in question leads straight back to Merriweather; no traffic exiting Merriweather would take that exit.

Is anyone privy to SHA's thinking? Was the cloverleaf in bad shape or somehow considered substandard?

Converting cloverleafs to parclos is pretty common. SHA has done it elsewhere (like I-270 at MD 85) as have other agencies (I-376 at US 22/US 30/PA 60 near Pittsburgh, I-81 at US 33 in Harrisonburg, VA, I-70 at OH 79 near Buckeye Lake, OH). Removing one of the inner loops often results in better traffic flow on the main route since it eliminates weaving.

I feel MDSHA has definitely cracked down on cloverleaf interchanges, more than any other jurisdiction I know. I can name a dozen or more where they've taken loops out.

cpzilliacus

#2016
Quote from: MillTheRoadgeek on February 26, 2021, 01:12:45 PM
Quote from: Bitmapped on February 23, 2021, 10:23:03 PM
Quote from: mcmc on February 23, 2021, 09:16:01 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on February 23, 2021, 08:53:41 PM
Merriweather Post Pavilion is at the next interchange south of there and Little Patuxent Parkway is one of the routes traffic leaving the venue uses, especially northbound, which is the direction whose access is expedited by closing that loop.
Good hunch, but I don't think that's it. The ramp in question leads straight back to Merriweather; no traffic exiting Merriweather would take that exit.

Is anyone privy to SHA's thinking? Was the cloverleaf in bad shape or somehow considered substandard?

Converting cloverleafs to parclos is pretty common. SHA has done it elsewhere (like I-270 at MD 85) as have other agencies (I-376 at US 22/US 30/PA 60 near Pittsburgh, I-81 at US 33 in Harrisonburg, VA, I-70 at OH 79 near Buckeye Lake, OH). Removing one of the inner loops often results in better traffic flow on the main route since it eliminates weaving.

I feel MDSHA has definitely cracked down on cloverleaf interchanges, more than any other jurisdiction I know. I can name a dozen or more where they've taken loops out.

Maybe the biggest interchange to get the cloverleaf ramps removed was the one at I-95 Exit 19 with U.S. 50 ("secret" I-595) in Prince George's County.  The creaking old cloverleaf (dated to the opening of the Capital Beltway) was not able to keep up with increased traffic volumes, so three of the four cloverleaf ramps were removed in the 1980's. Access to the New Carrollton Metrorail, Metrobus, inter-city bus and Amtrak was also improved - and the nearby interchange at U.S. 50 and MD-704 was upgraded.

EDIT:  U.S. 50 was widened and most of the other interchanges between MD-410 (Veterans Parkway) and MD-70 (Rowe Boulevard) were modified or totally rebuilt at this time.
Opinions expressed here on AAROADS are strictly personal and mine alone, and do not reflect policies or positions of MWCOG, NCRTPB or their member federal, state, county and municipal governments or any other agency.

Roadsguy

Quote from: cpzilliacus on March 01, 2021, 02:03:35 PM
...three of the four cloverleaf ramps were removed in the 1980's.

And the loop that wasn't removed was widened to two lanes!
Mileage-based exit numbering implies the existence of mileage-cringe exit numbering.

tolbs17

Virginia still has MANY of those! I'm guessing it's to slow traffic down and make roads more pedestrian-friendly.

Alps

Quote from: tolbs17 on March 01, 2021, 10:35:36 PM
Virginia still has MANY of those! I'm guessing it's to slow traffic down and make roads more pedestrian-friendly.
what

MASTERNC

Not sure if anyone picked this up, but the MDTA has advertised plans to remove the Fort McHenry Tunnel toll plaza and to install gantries instead.

https://emma.maryland.gov/page.aspx/en/bpm/process_manage_extranet/31984

plain

Quote from: MASTERNC on March 02, 2021, 12:47:00 PM
Not sure if anyone picked this up, but the MDTA has advertised plans to remove the Fort McHenry Tunnel toll plaza and to install gantries instead.

https://emma.maryland.gov/page.aspx/en/bpm/process_manage_extranet/31984

I figured this was bound to happen since it's now cashless anyway because of the pandemic. At least this will eliminate the congestion associated with the barrier.
Newark born, Richmond bred

jmacswimmer

Quote from: plain on March 02, 2021, 01:58:33 PM
Quote from: MASTERNC on March 02, 2021, 12:47:00 PM
Not sure if anyone picked this up, but the MDTA has advertised plans to remove the Fort McHenry Tunnel toll plaza and to install gantries instead.

https://emma.maryland.gov/page.aspx/en/bpm/process_manage_extranet/31984

I figured this was bound to happen since it's now cashless anyway because of the pandemic. At least this will eliminate the congestion associated with the barrier.

Hopefully the JFK & BHT toll plazas aren't far behind.  (Nice Bridge was/is already planned to be converted to AET as part of the replacement project.)
"Now, what if da Bearss were to enter the Indianapolis 5-hunnert?"
"How would they compete?"
"Let's say they rode together in a big buss."
"Is Ditka driving?"
"Of course!"
"Then I like da Bear buss."
"DA BEARSSS BUSSSS"

MASTERNC

Quote from: jmacswimmer on March 02, 2021, 02:21:23 PM
Quote from: plain on March 02, 2021, 01:58:33 PM
Quote from: MASTERNC on March 02, 2021, 12:47:00 PM
Not sure if anyone picked this up, but the MDTA has advertised plans to remove the Fort McHenry Tunnel toll plaza and to install gantries instead.

https://emma.maryland.gov/page.aspx/en/bpm/process_manage_extranet/31984

I figured this was bound to happen since it's now cashless anyway because of the pandemic. At least this will eliminate the congestion associated with the barrier.

Hopefully the JFK & BHT toll plazas aren't far behind.  (Nice Bridge was/is already planned to be converted to AET as part of the replacement project.)

The BHT toll plaza is part of another project currently in the study phase

https://mdta.maryland.gov/I895TollPlaza

cpzilliacus

Quote from: MASTERNC on March 02, 2021, 04:02:57 PM
Quote from: jmacswimmer on March 02, 2021, 02:21:23 PM
Quote from: plain on March 02, 2021, 01:58:33 PM
Quote from: MASTERNC on March 02, 2021, 12:47:00 PM
Not sure if anyone picked this up, but the MDTA has advertised plans to remove the Fort McHenry Tunnel toll plaza and to install gantries instead.

https://emma.maryland.gov/page.aspx/en/bpm/process_manage_extranet/31984

I figured this was bound to happen since it's now cashless anyway because of the pandemic. At least this will eliminate the congestion associated with the barrier.

Hopefully the JFK & BHT toll plazas aren't far behind.  (Nice Bridge was/is already planned to be converted to AET as part of the replacement project.)

The BHT toll plaza is part of another project currently in the study phase

https://mdta.maryland.gov/I895TollPlaza

This is an example of a project that should probably not need to go through the full NEPA process.
Opinions expressed here on AAROADS are strictly personal and mine alone, and do not reflect policies or positions of MWCOG, NCRTPB or their member federal, state, county and municipal governments or any other agency.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.