News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.

Main Menu

Highways with the same number that intersect

Started by bugo, December 06, 2017, 02:16:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

bugo

This thread is intended to be a complete list of highways with the same number that intersect. Interstates that "turn into" state highways like I-440 and AR 440 do not count. I-41 and US 41 do not count either. Here's a start.

US 27/GA 27
US 70/TX 70
I-74/US 74
US 360/VA 360
US 287/MT 287
US 95/AZ 95
I-64/IN 64

"Almost"
US 59/AR 59
US 30/UT 30
US 89/WY 89

Which ones am I forgetting? Do CO 24, CO 36 and CO 40 still exist, and do they meet their respective US highways?


Hurricane Rex

Am I right to assume that suffixes do not count? Example Interstate 35W and 35 E.

In Oregon there is a near miss between I 82 and OR 82. Although they are 50 miles apart, in the Origional interstate plan, I 84 was to be signed as I 82 and OR 82 already existed at the time. I'm already surprised to see this many intersections.
ODOT, raise the speed limit and fix our traffic problems.

Road and weather geek for life.

Running till I die.

GenExpwy

NY 90 crosses over I-90, but there is no interchange.

jakeroot

There's a few states where this isn't possible. Washington and Utah come to mind. I thought Oregon was the same way, but ^^ evidently not.

hotdogPi

Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 44, 50
MA 22, 40, 107, 109, 117, 119, 126, 141, 159
NH 27, 111A(E); CA 133; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

froggie


Mapmikey

Quote from: froggie on December 06, 2017, 09:08:34 AM
Pretty sure we've had this thread before.

Possibly more than once...

Here is a more recent iteration:  https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=20643.0

Now we have two threads with the same subject intersecting in a forum...

Super Mateo

Quote from: bugo on December 06, 2017, 02:16:20 AM
I-74/US 74

I'm not sure where these intersect.  I-74 is a mess in NC.  The segment of it I was on last year was mostly concurrent with I-73 and US 220, making the number completely unnecessary.  A few days later, I was on US 1 heading to US 74 and there was NO I-74 signage there.  From the maps I've seen, I haven't seen anywhere where I-74 and US 74 cross or split.  I-74 just randomly shows up in various places.  NC is doing us no favors by signing it in broken segments.

That said, it's also I-73, and it intersects NC 73 west of the Sandhills area, so that one can be added.

Mapmikey

Quote from: Super Mateo on December 07, 2017, 03:42:29 PM
Quote from: bugo on December 06, 2017, 02:16:20 AM
I-74/US 74

I'm not sure where these intersect.  I-74 is a mess in NC.  The segment of it I was on last year was mostly concurrent with I-73 and US 220, making the number completely unnecessary.  A few days later, I was on US 1 heading to US 74 and there was NO I-74 signage there.  From the maps I've seen, I haven't seen anywhere where I-74 and US 74 cross or split.  I-74 just randomly shows up in various places.  NC is doing us no favors by signing it in broken segments.

That said, it's also I-73, and it intersects NC 73 west of the Sandhills area, so that one can be added.

I-74/US 74 intersects US 74 Bus and US 74 ALT all at the same interchange.  There is no one angle to see all 4 shields but here it is:

https://goo.gl/maps/pN5qNkTnaJn

JasonOfORoads

Quote from: jakeroot on December 06, 2017, 02:59:19 AM
There's a few states where this isn't possible. Washington and Utah come to mind. I thought Oregon was the same way, but ^^ evidently not.

In the days before the Interstate system, it was supposed to be a single number for a single type. Older versions of the highway commission document "Descriptions of OR and US routes" stated that Oregon Routes 228, 230 and 297 were not to be issued so as to reserve the numbers for potential US route expansions. Only those numbers were reserved because Oregon's secondary route system only used 2xx numbers at the time. Of course, both OR-228 and OR-230 were assigned in that same document. IIRC after US-26 was extended into Oregon and US-28 was deprecated, the number changed to OR-226/US-226 that was reserved. I'll have to dig out the documents when I have more time and extract the exact text to post here.

Oregon also has about as far of a miss as you can get within the state with I-205 and OR-205.
Borderline addicted to roadgeeking since ~1989.

jp the roadgeek

I-695 and MD 695 is a strange case.  Google Maps and Apple Maps show a MD 695 on Broening Highway that leads to Dundalk Marine Terminal, but it officially known as MD 695A.  Meanwhile, MD 695 is the official designation of I-695 between the northern junction of I-95 and I-97.
Interstates I've clinched: 97, 290 (MA), 291 (CT), 291 (MA), 293, 295 (DE-NJ-PA), 295 (RI-MA), 384, 391, 395 (CT-MA), 395 (MD), 495 (DE), 610 (LA), 684, 691, 695 (MD), 695 (NY), 795 (MD)

1995hoo

US-360 and VA-360 famously (amongst roadgeeks) meet at an intersection where the signage has auxiliary "US"  and "STATE"  signage.
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"
—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

KeithE4Phx

US 95 and AZ 95 meet at I-10 in Quartzsite AZ.
"Oh, so you hate your job? Well, why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called "EVERYBODY!" They meet at the bar." -- Drew Carey

Henry

A future instance is I-69 and US 69 around Lufkin, TX.
Go Cubs Go! Go Cubs Go! Hey Chicago, what do you say? The Cubs are gonna win today!

Hurricane Rex

Quote from: Henry on December 08, 2017, 08:55:00 AM
A future instance is I-69 and US 69 around Lufkin, TX.

Which is against interstate rules. I remember reading that Interstates and US highways with the same number can't be in the same state. I 69 was amusing enough before but this gives it a little extra value.
ODOT, raise the speed limit and fix our traffic problems.

Road and weather geek for life.

Running till I die.

Max Rockatansky

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned US 1 and A1A.

Brandon

Quote from: Hurricane Rex on December 08, 2017, 11:42:57 AM
Quote from: Henry on December 08, 2017, 08:55:00 AM
A future instance is I-69 and US 69 around Lufkin, TX.

Which is against interstate rules. I remember reading that Interstates and US highways with the same number can't be in the same state. I 69 was amusing enough before but this gives it a little extra value.

I-24 and US-24 in Illinois say hello, even though they're in different parts of the state.
"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention." - Ramsay Bolton, "Game of Thrones"

"Symbolic of his struggle against reality." - Reg, "Monty Python's Life of Brian"

kphoger

Quote from: Hurricane Rex on December 08, 2017, 11:42:57 AM
Quote from: Henry on December 08, 2017, 08:55:00 AM
A future instance is I-69 and US 69 around Lufkin, TX.

Which is against interstate rules. I remember reading that Interstates and US highways with the same number can't be in the same state. I 69 was amusing enough before but this gives it a little extra value.

Tell that to Wisconsin.
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

Quote from: Philip K. DickIf you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use them.

NWI_Irish96

I-64 and IN 64 intersect
I-265 and IN 265 are connecting segments of the same highway
Indiana: counties 100%, highways 100%
Illinois: counties 100%, highways 61%
Michigan: counties 100%, highways 56%
Wisconsin: counties 86%, highways 23%

Big John

Quote from: kphoger on December 08, 2017, 01:44:51 PM
Quote from: Hurricane Rex on December 08, 2017, 11:42:57 AM
Quote from: Henry on December 08, 2017, 08:55:00 AM
A future instance is I-69 and US 69 around Lufkin, TX.

Which is against interstate rules. I remember reading that Interstates and US highways with the same number can't be in the same state. I 69 was amusing enough before but this gives it a little extra value.

Tell that to Wisconsin.
who took the cue from North Carolina.

ilpt4u

#20
Quote from: Big John on December 08, 2017, 05:35:18 PM
Quote from: kphoger on December 08, 2017, 01:44:51 PM
Quote from: Hurricane Rex on December 08, 2017, 11:42:57 AM
Quote from: Henry on December 08, 2017, 08:55:00 AM
A future instance is I-69 and US 69 around Lufkin, TX.

Which is against interstate rules. I remember reading that Interstates and US highways with the same number can't be in the same state. I 69 was amusing enough before but this gives it a little extra value.

Tell that to Wisconsin.
who took the cue from North Carolina.
IL could have expanded it first beyond US 24 and I-24. US 51 would have been just fine, grid-wise (or at least close enough), as I-51 north of Bloomington-Normal into Wisconsin, in lieu of I-39. 20/20 hindsight

Roadgeekteen

Quote from: jakeroot on December 06, 2017, 02:59:19 AM
There's a few states where this isn't possible. Washington and Utah come to mind. I thought Oregon was the same way, but ^^ evidently not.
Also California and Massachusetts.
God-emperor of Alanland, king of all the goats and goat-like creatures

Current Interstate map I am making:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?hl=en&mid=1PEDVyNb1skhnkPkgXi8JMaaudM2zI-Y&ll=29.05778059819179%2C-82.48856825&z=5

jp the roadgeek

Quote from: Roadgeekteen on December 08, 2017, 10:52:20 PM
Quote from: jakeroot on December 06, 2017, 02:59:19 AM
There's a few states where this isn't possible. Washington and Utah come to mind. I thought Oregon was the same way, but ^^ evidently not.
Also California and Massachusetts.

Yes and no for Massachusetts.  The only exception to the no duplication rule in MA is I-295 and MA 295.  Of course, they're at opposite ends of the state and both are continuations of routes from another state.  CT, RI, VT, ME, and NJ have no duplication at all. NH only has 1: US/NH 4 as the result of a continuation of ME 4, and they come within 5 miles of each other.   PA only has 3 duplicates (86, 99, and 380); the first 2 were the result of interstates that came much later, and the last one are routes that are over 300 miles apart.  DE only has 1 exception that qualifies (US/DE 202 doesn't): US 9 and DE 9.
Interstates I've clinched: 97, 290 (MA), 291 (CT), 291 (MA), 293, 295 (DE-NJ-PA), 295 (RI-MA), 384, 391, 395 (CT-MA), 395 (MD), 495 (DE), 610 (LA), 684, 691, 695 (MD), 695 (NY), 795 (MD)

TheHighwayMan3561

A few states like MN and WI had non-duplication policies until specific instances came up; here it was MN 62 (the two are about 100 miles apart) and in WI it was I-39 coexisting with WIS 39 separated by about 40 miles.
self-certified as the dumbest person on this board for 5 years running

csw

#24
Quote from: cabiness42 on December 08, 2017, 03:42:52 PM
I-64 and IN 64 intersect
I-265 and IN 265 are connecting segments of the same highway
There are a few of these signs posted on US 41 to avoid confusion between the two 64s. https://goo.gl/maps/vj9FTDE1qiR2

And heading the other way..... https://goo.gl/maps/NNeNTaSAGPU2



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.