AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 on: Today at 02:16:47 AM 
Started by agentsteel53 - Last post by Hurricane Rex
Is Google Maps running slow for you guys? It is painfully slow for me, to the point that its basically non-usable. The problem is not my computer because I just did a clean install of Windows on a new hard drive. I'm using Edge, which is really fast on other websites

It's running fine for me. I flip between edge and chrome.

 on: Today at 02:03:42 AM 
Started by Mergingtraffic - Last post by yakra
What is the answer to the ultimate question of life, Connecticut, and everything?

 on: Today at 02:03:19 AM 
Started by Ian - Last post by Hurricane Rex
My list is sad...:

Interstates: I-205 (Oregon), I-405 (Oregon)

US Highways: None

MT State Highways: SR 135, 35, 40, 28, going to the sun road.

WA State Highways: SR 8, 507, 970, 285, 207, 123, 510, 16, 3, 18, 7, 702, 508, 504, 903, 706

OR State Highways: SR 22, 18, 8, 10, 82, 370, 372, 35, 38, 224, 228, 212, 180, 214, 219, 240, 217, 6, 104.

 on: Today at 01:59:56 AM 
Started by Scott5114 - Last post by bugo
The north part of the Indian Nation Turnpike is useful in getting from Tulsa to Dallas and points south. The south part is less useful.

 on: Today at 01:55:33 AM 
Started by adventurernumber1 - Last post by adventurernumber1
I just found out tonight that Dolores O'Riordan of the band The Cranberries passed away a few days ago. I am not as familiar with The Cranberries, but I really like the songs of their's that I do know. This is an incredibly tragic loss, and it was very unexpected. She was still very young when she died. I don't think the cause of her death has been released yet, so we have no idea what caused it. May she rest in peace...  :-(

 on: Today at 01:54:58 AM 
Started by Mergingtraffic - Last post by relaxok

That sure is a good-looking sign.

 on: Today at 01:52:14 AM 
Started by theroadwayone - Last post by sparker
Has anyone explored the "events chain" that resulted in the current situation that defines Breezewood?  Were all these businesses who admittedly would be affected by a direct I-70/Turnpike connection around when the exit was simply to provide local access or old PA 26?  Did a national chain such as Perkins decide to locate a restaurant near the original Breezewood exit pre-I-70 construction (I'm going to assume that McDonalds would have been there under any circumstances as is their normal saturation practice!).  In short -- looking around the country at, well, pretty much any other Interstate junction, why would any business elect to locate an outlet in Breezewood given the precedent that Interstate junctions under normative circumstances feature direct (if not always high-speed) connecting ramps that don't require exiting one limited-access facility before entering the next. 

I don't expect any of the parties involved to supply an answer here -- but the choices are (a) corporate management calculated that enough travelers would get on & off the turnpike, along with serving the local area, to make the location profitable (that in itself is something of a stretch) or (b) that same management had foreknowledge of the likelihood that the direct connection would never be made -- the fix was in!  Given the byzantine nature of PA, its agencies, and how they've functioned over the years, I'd give the edge to (b).  The whole situation is akin to the classic "circle jerk" in that the agencies involved (state DOT, turnpike authority, USDOT/BPR/FHWA) all point to each other as the promulgator of the situation.  It would sure be interesting to follow the money trail here through the Shuster clan donor base, the PTC membership over the years when I-70 was being planned and built, and corporate "contributions" to entities held dear by PA politicos -- local, state, and national.  I normally don't speculate on outlandish conspiracy theories -- but there's just too much "gray area" surrounding Breezewood and its decades of status quo defenders that clouds the basic facts of the matter.  The questions that must be asked are: what makes Breezewood unique -- and why?; why does PA stand alone among all states in their approach to the relationship between turnpikes and other intersecting highways?; and precisely who stands to gain the most by retaining the status quo?

 on: Today at 01:48:57 AM 
Started by Hurricane Rex - Last post by Hurricane Rex
Portland is now 20 on most roads now. Another effect of the vision zero failure.

What's the criteria for failure? Not enough vehicle-related fatalities and injuries on city streets that are teeming with people on foot? You don't need to be going any faster than 20 mph on residential back streets.
Believe it or not, I actually want people to slow down in neighborhoods but the problem is when a speed limit is lowered, most drivers don't change their habits. Also, Portland PD has come out saying they won't do any increased patrols or anything special to enforce the 20 mph limit.

Why vision zero will fail: If your goal was just as close to 0 as possible, that is reasonable. What most plans have done: 0 deaths on the road by 2030 (12 years). With distracted driving, drunk driving also prevalent causes, I don't see any money going to that and people will still do it. We all know a lot of drivers who don't pay attention to the road. This doesn't even include weather related traffic deaths.

The goal is zero preventable deaths related to traffic incidents. This means taking engineering actions to build safer roads for all users (forcing drivers to slow down, clearing sight lines, building bicycle facilities), stepping up much-needed enforcement, training better commercial drivers, and having reasonable transportation options for those who can't drive.

Portland's vision zero website says nothing about predictable that I could see, also it's 2025, not 2030 like I thought. Plus weather-related and distracted driving is predictable.

Vision Zero is the goal to eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries by 2025.

 on: Today at 01:17:24 AM 
Started by Mergingtraffic - Last post by roadguy2
The grooves have to be crosswise for it to make the whining sound. I-15 in Salt Lake City has that sound as well. I especially like driving over places where the pavement switches to crosswise-grooved concrete.

Unfortunately, new concrete freeways around here all have lengthwise grooves, so no whining noises. There are a few newer bridges that might have it, but UDOT has started paving over a lot of concrete bridges with blacktop.

 on: Today at 01:07:24 AM 
Started by empirestate - Last post by chays
January 19, 2018
Alabama (next up: Alaska)
Courtesy of Alpsroads

Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.