AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned  (Read 1063 times)

Kniwt

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 390
  • Last Login: Today at 01:17:27 AM
I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« on: August 14, 2017, 11:55:23 PM »

https://www.reviewjournal.com/traffic/state-moving-ahead-with-a-57-8m-freeway-project-near-apex/

Quote
Ames Construction will widen a 5-mile stretch of U.S. Highway 93 from Interstate 15 to Apex Power Parkway in North Las Vegas, under a contract awarded Monday morning by the Nevada Department of Transportation’s board of directors.

Work is expected to start by March on the Garnet interchange, and completed by the end of 2018.

... NDOT officials said they are still pushing ahead with the project because U.S. 93 interchange at I-15 was built to substandard specifications and is prone to flooding. Additionally, the Garnet interchange is part of a major hauling route for truckers, and NDOT officials said they hope to see growth soon at the adjacent Apex complex.

Project website: https://www.nevadadot.com/projects-programs/road-projects/i-15-u-s-93-garnet-interchange-u-s-93-capacity-improvements


Logged

Sub-Urbanite

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 207
  • There's at least a 60% chance I'm just trolling

  • Location: Portland, OR
  • Last Login: January 13, 2018, 01:06:34 PM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2017, 11:18:48 AM »

Good. The stretch of 93 from I-15 to the Pahranagat Valley is treacherous. Two lanes, 70 mph, lots of dips and ravines making passing hard. Every bit chipped away as 2+2 is a win for safety.
Logged

Kniwt

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 390
  • Last Login: Today at 01:17:27 AM
Logged

sparker

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3033
  • Location: Bay Area, CA
  • Last Login: Today at 06:15:49 AM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2018, 01:50:15 AM »

Kick because the project is getting underway:
https://lasvegassun.com/news/2018/jan/02/58-million-freeway-enhancement-planned-for-nlv-nea/

And of note because there's going to be a rather unusual DDI as part of the project:
https://www.nevadadot.com/projects-programs/road-projects/i-15-u-s-93-garnet-interchange-u-s-93-capacity-improvements



Holy shit!  It's a DDI; no, it's a roundabout; no it's a reverse roundabout; uhhh....it's a reverse roundabout after a trip through a table vise with half a DDI tacked on.  Let's hope there's sufficient traffic out in that neck of the woods to warrant such a convoluted interchange!  :crazy:
Logged

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3219
  • Age: 34
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: January 15, 2018, 10:43:55 PM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2018, 12:36:45 PM »

Holy shit!  It's a DDI; no, it's a roundabout; no it's a reverse roundabout; uhhh....it's a reverse roundabout after a trip through a table vise with half a DDI tacked on.  Let's hope there's sufficient traffic out in that neck of the woods to warrant such a convoluted interchange!  :crazy:

Not too much traffic out that way at the present moment, but expected to be in the future. They're four-laning the first few miles off of US 93 primarily because this area is expected to become part of the Apex Industrial Park. It's where the Faraday Future car production factory was supposed to locate. Despite the Faraday plant not happening now, the road improvements are moving forward. So it's a similar situation to Tesla locating in the Tahoe-Reno Industrial Complex east of Reno that spurred NDOT to fast-track completion of SR 439 down to US 50.

The design certainly seems weird, but it's kind of an elegant solution that preserves existing frontage road access (and facilitates the frontage road that will be constructed along US 93 in the area) as well as access to whatever is on the northeast side of that interchange. Operationally, the single DDI crossover point is the only spot in the interchange where major movements might have to stop, so it looks decently efficient.
Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

Kniwt

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 390
  • Last Login: Today at 01:17:27 AM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2018, 07:05:49 PM »

whatever is on the northeast side of that interchange.

Big honkin' landfill.
https://lasvegassun.com/news/2009/dec/07/mountains-garbage/
Quote
The biggest landfill in the U.S. is tucked away in a narrow valley in the Apex area an hour north of Las Vegas, just off Interstate 15 but not visible from the freeway. ... It does faintly stink, but not as bad as one might expect, considering it stores nearly 50 million tons of rotting trash. Another 9,000 tons or so rolls in every day.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2018, 09:25:16 PM by Kniwt »
Logged

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3219
  • Age: 34
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: January 15, 2018, 10:43:55 PM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2018, 12:47:49 PM »

whatever is on the northeast side of that interchange.

Big honkin' landfill.
https://lasvegassun.com/news/2009/dec/07/mountains-garbage/
Quote
The biggest landfill in the U.S. is tucked away in a narrow valley in the Apex area an hour north of Las Vegas, just off Interstate 15 but not visible from the freeway. ... It does faintly stink, but not as bad as one might expect, considering it stores nearly 50 million tons of rotting trash. Another 9,000 tons or so rolls in every day.

So that's where the Apex landfill is. I always thought it was further south (near the actual interchange called Apex).

In that case, the proposed design/access on the east side of the interchange makes even more sense, as it should result in slightly smoother access for all the garbage trucks going in and out.
Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3219
  • Age: 34
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: January 15, 2018, 10:43:55 PM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2018, 10:41:49 AM »

NDOT posted an animation to their YouTube channel, which shows how traffic will flow through the interchange.

Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

DJStephens

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 323
  • Location: Dona Ana New Mexico USA
  • Last Login: January 12, 2018, 09:56:34 PM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2018, 05:02:45 PM »

Holy shit!  It's a DDI; no, it's a roundabout; no it's a reverse roundabout; uhhh....it's a reverse roundabout after a trip through a table vise with half a DDI tacked on.  Let's hope there's sufficient traffic out in that neck of the woods to warrant such a convoluted interchange!  :crazy:

Not too much traffic out that way at the present moment, but expected to be in the future. They're four-laning the first few miles off of US 93 primarily because this area is expected to become part of the Apex Industrial Park. It's where the Faraday Future car production factory was supposed to locate. Despite the Faraday plant not happening now, the road improvements are moving forward. So it's a similar situation to Tesla locating in the Tahoe-Reno Industrial Complex east of Reno that spurred NDOT to fast-track completion of SR 439 down to US 50.

The design certainly seems weird, but it's kind of an elegant solution that preserves existing frontage road access (and facilitates the frontage road that will be constructed along US 93 in the area) as well as access to whatever is on the northeast side of that interchange. Operationally, the single DDI crossover point is the only spot in the interchange where major movements might have to stop, so it looks decently efficient.

By the aerial photo - it appears that interchange is nearly vacant around it.  Why not go full blown fully directional with flyovers, with ROW preservation for connection(s) to frontage?   This does involve connection of a US Federal route and an Interstate.   
Logged

1

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4525
  • UMass Lowell student

  • Age: 18
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: January 15, 2018, 10:14:07 PM
    • Flickr account
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus US 2, 13, 50, and several state routes

Flickr

sparker

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3033
  • Location: Bay Area, CA
  • Last Login: Today at 06:15:49 AM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2018, 05:23:03 PM »

By the aerial photo - it appears that interchange is nearly vacant around it.  Why not go full blown fully directional with flyovers, with ROW preservation for connection(s) to frontage?   This does involve connection of a US Federal route and an Interstate.   

Since the improvement of US 93 in the area is primarily for the benefit of local access rather than to the longer-distance highway heading north, revising the I-15/US 93 interchange to a full freeway-to-freeway facility probably wasn't even considered at this time; the unique interchange configuration along US 93 to the north connects to a local arterial (and the adjacent landfill) and is likely there to avoid potential congestion along both intersecting roads -- and for safety's sake, since there will be a lot of slow-moving trucks heading to and from the dump.  I wouldn't read too much into the US 93 upgrade just yet; what's happening is locally promulgated for local use; any long-distance benefits are simply along for the ride!
Logged

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3219
  • Age: 34
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: January 15, 2018, 10:43:55 PM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2018, 10:29:23 AM »

By the aerial photo - it appears that interchange is nearly vacant around it.  Why not go full blown fully directional with flyovers, with ROW preservation for connection(s) to frontage?   This does involve connection of a US Federal route and an Interstate.   

Since the improvement of US 93 in the area is primarily for the benefit of local access rather than to the longer-distance highway heading north, revising the I-15/US 93 interchange to a full freeway-to-freeway facility probably wasn't even considered at this time; the unique interchange configuration along US 93 to the north connects to a local arterial (and the adjacent landfill) and is likely there to avoid potential congestion along both intersecting roads -- and for safety's sake, since there will be a lot of slow-moving trucks heading to and from the dump.  I wouldn't read too much into the US 93 upgrade just yet; what's happening is locally promulgated for local use; any long-distance benefits are simply along for the ride!

Flyover ramps were considered, along with a couple other options (I believe I saw this as a presentation file attached to agenda/minutes from an NDOT Board of Directors meeting a few months ago). However, this planned configuration should more than handle the expected volumes in the vicinity for the next several years—note that the 4-lane conversion of US 93 only extends a few miles, adjacent to the planned industrial park lands.

I'd rather NDOT do something somewhat innovative like this, rather than spend money on a flyover that won't get a considerable amount of use for a long while. There's other interchange work that NDOT needs to hold onto their money for... such as completing the full build-out of CC 215 beltway interchanges at US 95 and at northern I-15, addressing the I-515 viaduct, or rebuilding the Reno Spaghetti Bowl (which has entered the study phase).
Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

sparker

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3033
  • Location: Bay Area, CA
  • Last Login: Today at 06:15:49 AM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #12 on: January 12, 2018, 05:53:49 PM »

...............rebuilding the Reno Spaghetti Bowl (which has entered the study phase).

So glad to see that NDOT is at least studying improvements for this interchange; it may have been fine in the '70's when it was built (when Reno was barely 100K population), but now that the area is growing, it's jammed up during commute times, particularly the loops.  We've got lots of friends scattered from Reno down to Minden, and during winter the visiting trips generally go through this interchange.  As far as I'm concerned, installing some higher-capacity flyovers and direct ramps can't come soon enough!
Logged

roadfro

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3219
  • Age: 34
  • Location: Reno, NV
  • Last Login: January 15, 2018, 10:43:55 PM
Re: I-15/US 93 Garnet interchange to be rebuilt; 93 to be 4-laned
« Reply #13 on: January 13, 2018, 10:46:40 AM »

...............rebuilding the Reno Spaghetti Bowl (which has entered the study phase).

So glad to see that NDOT is at least studying improvements for this interchange; it may have been fine in the '70's when it was built (when Reno was barely 100K population), but now that the area is growing, it's jammed up during commute times, particularly the loops.  We've got lots of friends scattered from Reno down to Minden, and during winter the visiting trips generally go through this interchange.  As far as I'm concerned, installing some higher-capacity flyovers and direct ramps can't come soon enough!

Realized this project hasn't really been brought up on this board, so started a new thread.
Logged
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.