AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules to ensure post quality. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: New Hampshire  (Read 98783 times)

Alps

  • y u m
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15356
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 40
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 11:38:26 PM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: New Hampshire
« Reply #325 on: June 29, 2022, 12:28:27 AM »

While I don't have any current new assemblies from Rockingham, Strafford or Hillsborough Counties... I do have a few in Coos County in Gorham from my last VT trip below.

South end of US 2/NH 16 multiplex reassurance (old, new)

North end of US 2/NH 16 multiplex split (old, new)

North end of US 2/NH 16 multiplex on mast arm (old, new)

If I can find anymore... I'll update this post. The ones were replaced were on Woodbury Ave when the Spaulding Turnpike got widened, a few around the Manchester area, and a few other places I'm not sure about.
The one on the mast arm is unusual. I don't dislike it but it's definitely not standard practice.

NE2

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 14366
  • fuck

  • Age: 14
  • Location: central Florida
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 05:52:16 PM
Re: New Hampshire
« Reply #326 on: August 13, 2022, 07:18:58 PM »

The 1909 Automobile Blue Book notes that "Automobiles not allowed on the new State Road on south side of Ammonoosuc River, extending from just west of Fabyans to about one mile beyond the White Mountain House." Anyone know what this was? The current alignment around Lower Falls Road/Trail was not built until about 1980, and I'm not seeing anything else obvious. Maybe the scar here and just north of the river here?
Logged
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

I agree to indemnify Belkin against unauthorized use of its MiniVak vacuum.

Ted$8roadFan

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 978
  • Location: Massachusetts
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 05:39:28 PM
Re: New Hampshire
« Reply #327 on: December 08, 2022, 06:37:43 AM »

(Late to the topic, but………) Now that Massachusetts and Rhode Island have fully converted their highway exit numbers to from sequential to mileage-based numbers, will New Hampshire be next?
Logged

BlueOutback7

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1956
  • Pennsylvania has bad control cities.

  • Age: 21
  • Location: Massachusetts
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 11:12:11 PM
Re: New Hampshire
« Reply #328 on: December 08, 2022, 07:52:23 AM »

(Late to the topic, but………) Now that Massachusetts and Rhode Island have fully converted their highway exit numbers to from sequential to mileage-based numbers, will New Hampshire be next?

Probably not until Chris Sununu leaves the governors office as he’s been very anti-exit renumbering, using the “I grew up as an Exit 3 kid” excuse. But New Hampshire really needs to get the exits renumbered. No excuses.
Logged
Decommission 128 south of Peabody!

Lowest untraveled number: 48

SectorZ

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2747
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Massachusetts
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 05:51:06 PM
Re: New Hampshire
« Reply #329 on: December 08, 2022, 09:05:24 AM »

(Late to the topic, but………) Now that Massachusetts and Rhode Island have fully converted their highway exit numbers to from sequential to mileage-based numbers, will New Hampshire be next?

Probably not until Chris Sununu leaves the governors office as he’s been very anti-exit renumbering, using the “I grew up as an Exit 3 kid” excuse. But New Hampshire really needs to get the exits renumbered. No excuses.

I was hoping he would figure it out with the plans to build exit 4A on 93, but for some reason it didn't sink in. I've been wanting them to do it so they could number exits without them as well.
Logged

The Ghostbuster

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3810
  • Age: 38
  • Location: Madison, WI
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 07:56:06 PM
Re: New Hampshire
« Reply #330 on: December 09, 2022, 06:42:46 PM »

There’s no guarantee that Governor Sequential’s (my nickname for Sununu) successor will be any less anti-exit renumbering than Sequential is. By the way, did New Hampshire request FHWA grant them a wavier to retain their sequential exit numbers, or did Sununu simply say New Hampshire will not convert to mileage-based exit numbers and leave it at that?
« Last Edit: December 09, 2022, 07:38:48 PM by The Ghostbuster »
Logged

SectorZ

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2747
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Massachusetts
  • Last Login: March 23, 2023, 05:51:06 PM
Re: New Hampshire
« Reply #331 on: December 09, 2022, 07:34:11 PM »

There’s no guarantee that Governor Sequential’s (my nickname for Sununu) successor will be any less anti-exit renumbering than Sequential is. By the way, did New Hampshire request FHWA grant them a wavier to Reagan their sequential exit numbers, or did Sununu simply say New Hampshire will not convert to mileage-based exit numbers and leave it at that?

I haven't read anything about the matter since 2019, when Sununu was mentioning he didn't want the state to pay the $1M out of pocket for the change, among other less-tangible complaints.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.