AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules to ensure post quality. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: Minnesota Notes  (Read 333892 times)

on_wisconsin

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 687
  • Location: Der Bierstaat
  • Last Login: Today at 04:17:16 AM
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #200 on: July 04, 2014, 06:16:53 PM »

Quick question, inspired by some mileage signs seen in the construction plans for MnDOT SP 8809-20:  what are the "Range Cities"?

I believe they are towns up in the Iron Range.
Logged
"Speed does not kill, suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you" - Jeremy Clarkson

TheHighwayMan394

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5445
  • Age: 32
  • Location: Twin Ports/North Shore
  • Last Login: Today at 01:24:00 AM
    • Patrick Lilja's Minnesconsin Highways
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #201 on: July 04, 2014, 08:01:45 PM »

Quick question, inspired by some mileage signs seen in the construction plans for MnDOT SP 8809-20:  what are the "Range Cities"?

I believe they are towns up in the Iron Range.

Correct. Roughly correlates to the cities along US/MN 169 northeast of Grand Rapids in northeastern Minnesota.
Logged

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12620
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 30, 2023, 11:53:03 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #202 on: July 05, 2014, 12:12:01 AM »

Likely referring to the mining cities (in Minnesota, any incorporated municipality is by definition a "city") along the Mesabi Range…generally along US 169 between Grand Rapids and Virginia.
Logged

on_wisconsin

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 687
  • Location: Der Bierstaat
  • Last Login: Today at 04:17:16 AM
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #203 on: July 05, 2014, 01:19:50 AM »

Does anyone know if MnDOT has any plans to improve or rebuild the eastern I-494/694/94 interchange? A flyover ramp and especially some C/D lanes on 494/694 would do wonders there.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2014, 05:56:34 AM by on_wisconsin »
Logged
"Speed does not kill, suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you" - Jeremy Clarkson

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12620
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 30, 2023, 11:53:03 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #204 on: July 05, 2014, 09:07:36 AM »

They don't.
Logged

Milepost61

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 146
  • Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado
  • Last Login: November 30, 2019, 01:04:31 PM
    • Milepost 61: The Colorado Highways Blog
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #205 on: July 06, 2014, 12:10:13 AM »

Bummer, C/D roads along 494/694 would do wonders for that cloverleaf. At least they extended the accel lanes so you have (a little) more distance than just what's between the loop ramps.
Logged

J N Winkler

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 8235
  • Location: Wichita, Kansas
  • Last Login: Today at 03:10:23 AM
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #206 on: July 06, 2014, 10:24:33 AM »

Just to thank those who responded upthread to my "Range Cities" question.  I have now gone back and looked at the plan sheets more closely.  "Range Cities" as defined refers to a 60-mile segment of US 169 between Grand Rapids and Virginia, so for distance signing purposes, I think distances are calculated on a "nearest neighbor" basis.

For example, SP 8809-20 calls for installation of the following distance sign:  Grandy 5, Mora 23, Range Cities 129.  These are forward destinations for TH 65 northbound and the distance given for "Range Cities" is actually the distance to Pengilly (US 169/TH 65 intersection), approximately midway between Grand Rapids and Virginia.
Logged
"It is necessary to spend a hundred lire now to save a thousand lire later."--Piero Puricelli, explaining the need for a first-class road system to Benito Mussolini

texaskdog

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3597
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Kyle, TX
  • Last Login: March 28, 2023, 11:17:20 PM
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #207 on: July 08, 2014, 10:44:08 AM »

Minnesota is always well behind on building what they need.  I forgot how many 2 lane freeways there were in the 8 years since I moved away.
Logged

The High Plains Traveler

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1138
  • Age: Just an old prairie dog

  • Location: Pueblo West CO
  • Last Login: March 17, 2023, 05:16:16 PM
    • Unofficial Minnesota and New Mexico Highway Pages
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #208 on: July 08, 2014, 11:02:11 AM »

With regard to the "Range Cities" question, that usage has been around since I moved to Minnesota (70s). I always took it to be centered around Hibbing and Virginia, without calculating a distance to any particular spot. In our recent trip there, I was surprised to see the "Twin Cities" control designation has basically disappeared on I-35 from the south. Now, you see alternating Minneapolis and St. Paul distances, and both cities on guide signs.
Logged
"Tongue-tied and twisted; just an earth-bound misfit, I."

SSOWorld

  • 'Sconsin
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4049
  • Interstate <Make up your mind!>

  • Age: 49
  • Location: MAH House!
  • Last Login: March 30, 2023, 09:08:30 PM
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #209 on: July 16, 2014, 10:09:41 PM »

But yet (off-topic) you see "The Oranges" and "The Amboys", etc in New Jersey :-D
Logged
Scott O.

Not all who wander are lost...
Ah, the open skies, wind at my back, warm sun on my... wait, where the hell am I?!
As a matter of fact, I do own the road.
Raise your what?

Wisconsin - out-multiplexing your state since 1918.

AplikowskiTheMinnesotan

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 23
  • Age: 23
  • Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
  • Last Login: August 31, 2015, 09:18:57 PM
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #210 on: July 24, 2014, 03:54:41 AM »

Minnesota is always well behind on building what they need.  I forgot how many 2 lane freeways there were in the 8 years since I moved away.

Oh let me tell ya. Some of the things they plan is dumb too. Like The 694 by Lake Valentine. It took two years worth of construction, TO MOVE IT OVER A FEW FEET! They didn't even widen the lanes!
Logged
Rush is the best band! Case closed.

Milepost61

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 146
  • Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado
  • Last Login: November 30, 2019, 01:04:31 PM
    • Milepost 61: The Colorado Highways Blog
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #211 on: July 27, 2014, 05:17:41 PM »

The groundbreaking was held a couple weeks ago on the MN-43 Mississippi River bridge project at Winona. The existing 1940s truss bridge was closed for a couple months back in 2008 when a rusted-through gusset plate was found, and after temporary repairs Mn/DOT started planning the rebuild project.

The project will build a new bridge just to the upstream side of the existing bridge, and traffic will be moved over to it (2016) and the existing bridge closed for rehabilitation. Once rehab is done (2019) both bridges will be opened turning it into a four-lane crossing.

Some historical photos here:
http://www.winonadailynews.com/special-section/winona-bridge-project/


The profile of the new bridge reminds me a little of the I-35W bridge. Must be Mn/DOT's new favorite bridge type.
Logged

Mdcastle

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 661
  • Last Login: March 30, 2023, 10:58:15 PM
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #212 on: July 27, 2014, 11:52:25 PM »

That's an amazing number of bicyclists and pedestrians, and someone forgot to tell the animator that traffic signals are no longer yellow. As for the project itself, I think it would have been better for the new  bridge to end on Huff St, there might be too much traffic dumped onto Winona St. in the future.
Logged

Milepost61

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 146
  • Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado
  • Last Login: November 30, 2019, 01:04:31 PM
    • Milepost 61: The Colorado Highways Blog
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #213 on: July 28, 2014, 11:19:14 PM »

Yeah Winona St does turn residential just a couple blocks from the bridge but most of the traffic turns at 4th or Broadway. Didn't ever seem to be an issue. Connecting it to Huff would've also caused issues with Riverview Drive, and I imagine the city wants Riverview the way it is since it provides the direct access to the river port.
Logged

The High Plains Traveler

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1138
  • Age: Just an old prairie dog

  • Location: Pueblo West CO
  • Last Login: March 17, 2023, 05:16:16 PM
    • Unofficial Minnesota and New Mexico Highway Pages
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #214 on: July 29, 2014, 12:46:04 PM »

I'm glad they're retaining and renovating that existing bridge at Winona. I always loved those older truss-cantilever bridges across the Mississippi. My favorite is the one at Lansing, IA.
Logged
"Tongue-tied and twisted; just an earth-bound misfit, I."

I94RoadRunner

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 245
  • Age: 47
  • Location: Mounds View, MN
  • Last Login: January 06, 2023, 02:11:30 PM
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #215 on: August 13, 2014, 08:19:54 PM »

Minnesota is always well behind on building what they need.  I forgot how many 2 lane freeways there were in the 8 years since I moved away.

Oh let me tell ya. Some of the things they plan is dumb too. Like The 694 by Lake Valentine. It took two years worth of construction, TO MOVE IT OVER A FEW FEET! They didn't even widen the lanes!

Yes, I live just north of there and made no sense to me why this section was not widened to 6 lanes. Thankfully the nasty weave between I-694/US 10/MN 51 Snelling was fixed and now don't have cross 2 lanes of traffic twice a day going from 10 to Snelling and returning for my daily commute!
Logged
Chris Kalina

“The easiest solution to fixing the I-238 problem is to redefine I-580 as I-38

Molandfreak

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1916
  • Age: 28
  • Last Login: Today at 01:14:18 AM
    • Instagram
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #216 on: September 01, 2014, 01:06:41 AM »

Got around to Cass Lake again today, finally snapped a better picture of a Minnesota Indian route sign! Indian Route 1004 is Oak Point road: not a dead-end road, but a road that loops back and junctions itself as it serves a few campgrounds and resorts along Leech Lake, between Steamboat Bay and Sucker Bay.

Logged

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12620
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 30, 2023, 11:53:03 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #217 on: September 02, 2014, 10:04:41 PM »


Oh let me tell ya. Some of the things they plan is dumb too. Like The 694 by Lake Valentine. It took two years worth of construction, TO MOVE IT OVER A FEW FEET! They didn't even widen the lanes!

Yes, I live just north of there and made no sense to me why this section was not widened to 6 lanes. Thankfully the nasty weave between I-694/US 10/MN 51 Snelling was fixed and now don't have cross 2 lanes of traffic twice a day going from 10 to Snelling and returning for my daily commute!

I believe this should address your concern...
Logged

I94RoadRunner

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 245
  • Age: 47
  • Location: Mounds View, MN
  • Last Login: January 06, 2023, 02:11:30 PM
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #218 on: September 03, 2014, 01:34:21 AM »


Oh let me tell ya. Some of the things they plan is dumb too. Like The 694 by Lake Valentine. It took two years worth of construction, TO MOVE IT OVER A FEW FEET! They didn't even widen the lanes!

Yes, I live just north of there and made no sense to me why this section was not widened to 6 lanes. Thankfully the nasty weave between I-694/US 10/MN 51 Snelling was fixed and now don't have cross 2 lanes of traffic twice a day going from 10 to Snelling and returning for my daily commute!

I believe this should address your concern...

Yes Adam, that will be a big improvement once it gets going. I only wonder why MNDOT did not go ahead and widen the section between I-35W and US 10 when they spent all of that time and money to move the road a few feet .....? Now if they want to widen that 2 mile section, they will have to go back and tear it all up again .....
Logged
Chris Kalina

“The easiest solution to fixing the I-238 problem is to redefine I-580 as I-38

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12620
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 30, 2023, 11:53:03 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #219 on: September 03, 2014, 06:23:02 AM »

Quote
Yes Adam, that will be a big improvement once it gets going. I only wonder why MNDOT did not go ahead and widen the section between I-35W and US 10 when they spent all of that time and money to move the road a few feet .....? Now if they want to widen that 2 mile section, they will have to go back and tear it all up again .....

A) They didn't have the money to widen it when they redid the Island Lake bridges, which were overdue for a rebuild.  What money they did have for 694 at the time rightfully went to undoing the mess at Snelling/Hwy 10.

B) The bridges were rebuilt with future widening already in mind.  There is no "tearing it all up again" necessary.
Logged

I94RoadRunner

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 245
  • Age: 47
  • Location: Mounds View, MN
  • Last Login: January 06, 2023, 02:11:30 PM
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #220 on: September 03, 2014, 10:02:23 PM »

I will have to send you a pic of the new bridges, they did not look like they were wide enough to accommodate another lane of traffic .....
Logged
Chris Kalina

“The easiest solution to fixing the I-238 problem is to redefine I-580 as I-38

Molandfreak

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1916
  • Age: 28
  • Last Login: Today at 01:14:18 AM
    • Instagram
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #221 on: September 21, 2014, 07:18:26 PM »


MN/DOT installation, neutered county 42 shield west of U.S. 61.
Logged

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12620
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 30, 2023, 11:53:03 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #222 on: September 21, 2014, 08:04:47 PM »

Installed directly as part of the Hastings bridge?
Logged

Molandfreak

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1916
  • Age: 28
  • Last Login: Today at 01:14:18 AM
    • Instagram
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #223 on: September 21, 2014, 10:36:08 PM »

That's what I'm assuming. MN/DOT stickers are on the back, not county ones.
Logged

TheHighwayMan394

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5445
  • Age: 32
  • Location: Twin Ports/North Shore
  • Last Login: Today at 01:24:00 AM
    • Patrick Lilja's Minnesconsin Highways
Re: Minnesota Notes
« Reply #224 on: September 21, 2014, 10:58:37 PM »

Hastings has a couple of other "neutered" county road shields posted on US 61. These are JCT signs though, and they're slightly more awkward because "COUNTY" is posted on the bottom of the pentagons.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.