Regional Boards > Southeast
Anybody know why I-910 was never signed?
Hot Rod Hootenanny:
--- Quote from: Anthony_JK on June 04, 2009, 07:19:08 PM ---
First off, they can't post those I-910 shields on the Westbank Expressway until they get to finishing elevating the WB all the way to US 90...due to Fed rules about an Interstate spur ending on a US or NHS system highway.
Anthony
--- End quote ---
So where's the southern terminus for I-510 in East Orleans?
74/171FAN:
--- Quote from: froggie on June 05, 2009, 06:34:51 AM ---They've had "logical termini" criteria for some time.
--- End quote ---
For how long? :-/
froggie:
--- Quote ---So where's the southern terminus for I-510 in East Orleans?
--- End quote ---
North end of the bridge over the Intracoastal Waterway. Though I-510 was different in that it was CHARGABLE Interstate mileage (i.e. part of the originally, Federally funded Interstate system).
--- Quote --- For how long?
--- End quote ---
At least back to the '90s...probably longer.
Hot Rod Hootenanny:
--- Quote from: froggie on June 06, 2009, 09:58:24 AM ---
--- Quote ---So where's the southern terminus for I-510 in East Orleans?
--- End quote ---
North end of the bridge over the Intracoastal Waterway. Though I-510 was different in that it was CHARGABLE Interstate mileage (i.e. part of the originally, Federally funded Interstate system).
--- End quote ---
What do you mean by that? What's the difference between I-510 with I-910 or I-310, or even I-10 itself? :confused:
bugo:
--- Quote from: froggie on June 05, 2009, 06:34:51 AM ---They've had "logical termini" criteria for some time.
--- End quote ---
Both of AR I-540's termini are illogical (north end far more than south end.) So is I-26 west's. And none of the NC I-73/74 routing makes any sense. Not to mention I-69 MS's southern end. Seems their criteria are arbitrarily enforced.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version