https://www.catskillmountainkeeper.org/rt_17_expansion_2_6_23
Gaia worshippers are gunning after the widening Rt 17.
"Increased mass transit?" In a rural area like the Catskills? Keep dreaming...
If 6 lanes are called for, it's not rural Catskills. More public transportation options for west side of Hudson was also called for when Tappan Zee replacement was discussed. It's not as crazy logistics wise to have a rail crossing and more rail commute for that area (crazy finance wise, though)
Now completion of I-86 is a completely different story, pun intended
I would disagree. Weekend traffic can completely overwhelm NY 17 from Monticello eastward. Even though the Catskills tourism industry has shifted from its over-reliance on Jewish-owned resorts in the Borscht Belt, it still has a considerable amount of traffic for its many other destinations - including the new Legoland. The many, many Jewish summer camps and settlements also generate a lot of traffic - to the point of creating very slow-moving traffic for dozens of miles on Friday and Sunday nights (unfortunately finding this out too many times). There is enough traffic to justify six lanes east of Monticello. I just wish the state was more aggressive in the closure of obsolete and duplicate highway ramps now, but at the least most will be taken care of in future projects.
So, correct me if I am wrong, but there are multiple factors pulling preferences in multiple directions
- more public transportation for commute would be great
- but that is too expensive, we have to use existing roads instead, improvement is cheaper
- but weekend traffic is overwhelming, and cannot be served by trains
- but as @Alps tells us, look at 90% service availability, not at peaks
- and Adirondacks and Catskills are running beyond visitor's capacity (I have to reluctantly agree with that), so more visitor throughput isn't the goal
- traffic distribution capacity may not be there, as @froggie points out.
- I-86 for long haul traffic!