MO: Extension of MO 465 from MO 76 to MO 376 under consideration

[US71]

Did he by chance get any photos on the high road itself?

No. This was a simple drive-by.

[US71]

RIP MO 465

[X99]

RIP MO 465

I'll only accept that it's gone when Google Maps says it's gone. Until then, it lives on.

[kphoger]

It's always been "the high road" to locals, though, and that it remains.  Similarly, few locals referred to "the strip" as "76 highway" to begin with either.

[US71]

RIP MO 465

I'll only accept that it's gone when Google Maps says it's gone. Until then, it lives on.

Shouldn't be too long, since I notified them

[ozarkman417]

Looking at the signs installed on the gantry in the background, I can only make out one shield on the sign to the left, and there is no text to side of the right shield on the right sign, so that must be one of the few signs not changed. I would try to get down there this weekend but that's hard to do without a license.

[X99]

RIP MO 465

I'll only accept that it's gone when Google Maps says it's gone. Until then, it lives on.

Shouldn't be too long, since I notified them

They may take our signs, but they'll never take our old Street View images!

[ozarkman417]

I wonder as to when the MoDOT traveler information map will be updated to reflect the changes.

[kphoger]

Looking at the signs installed on the gantry in the background, I can only make out one shield on the sign to the left, and there is no text to side of the right shield on the right sign, so that must be one of the few signs not changed. I would try to get down there this weekend but that's hard to do without a license.

hehehe....  I know plenty of people in your area who drive without a license.....   

[NE2]

Do 165 and 376 still exist with hanging ends?

[kphoger]

Do 165 and 376 still exist with hanging ends?

I've seen no indication that 165 is being changed, so I guess it will have a hanging end.  (For some reason, I thought Taney CH-165 continued past MO-165's northern terminus, but apparently that's not correct. ??)

However, MO-376 will not have a hanging end.  AIUI, this will be the new MO-376.

[NE2]

(For some reason, I thought Taney CH-165 continued past MO-165's northern terminus, but apparently that's not correct. ??)

https://www.google.com/maps/@36.6496105,-93.2646267,3a,15y,205.99h,90.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLp2fXP0h5dTakIeRfFD_sg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

[US71]

Looking at the signs installed on the gantry in the background, I can only make out one shield on the sign to the left, and there is no text to side of the right shield on the right sign, so that must be one of the few signs not changed. I would try to get down there this weekend but that's hard to do without a license.

hehehe....  I know plenty of people in your area who drive without a license.....   

Just because everyone does it, doesn't make it right.

[US 89]

RIP MO 465

I'll only accept that it's gone when Google Maps says it's gone. Until then, it lives on.

Shouldn't be too long, since I notified them

So innocent, thinking Google Maps actually listens to your input...

[US71]

RIP MO 465

I'll only accept that it's gone when Google Maps says it's gone. Until then, it lives on.

Shouldn't be too long, since I notified them

So innocent, thinking Google Maps actually listens to your input...

Occasionally, they do. Sometimes, they even get it right.

[X99]

The Wikipedia articles for these routes are a mess. 76 and 376 are unchanged, while 465 labels the route as active and inactive at the same time, with no references.

[US71]

The Wikipedia articles for these routes are a mess. 76 and 376 are unchanged, while 465 labels the route as active and inactive at the same time, with no references.

Feel free to change it

[ozarkman417]

I'm trying to change it right now, that's why any errors may be popping up. I haven't done a whole lot when it comes to changes to wikipedia, so feel free to fix any mess i may have made. I have worked on the articles of 465, US-65, and 76.

[ozarkman417]

RIP MO 465

I'll only accept that it's gone when Google Maps says it's gone. Until then, it lives on.

Shouldn't be too long, since I notified them

So innocent, thinking Google Maps actually listens to your input...

As long as some photographic evidence is sent, there is a chance.

[X99]

I'm trying to change it right now, that's why any errors may be popping up. I haven't done a whole lot when it comes to changes to wikipedia, so feel free to fix any mess i may have made. I have worked on the articles of 465, US-65, and 76.

So that's who 417Mario is. Alright, I can try to fix a few thi-

...runs congruent with US 65?

*keeps reading*

You marked the whole segment backwards, and put the routing change in the route description instead of the route history. It's fixed now on the 76 page, but I haven't checked the rest yet.

[ozarkman417]

I'm trying to change it right now, that's why any errors may be popping up. I haven't done a whole lot when it comes to changes to wikipedia, so feel free to fix any mess i may have made. I have worked on the articles of 465, US-65, and 76.

So that's who 417Mario is. Alright, I can try to fix a few thi-

...runs congruent with US 65?

*keeps reading*

You marked the whole segment backwards, and put the routing change in the route description instead of the route history. It's fixed now on the 76 page, but I haven't checked the rest yet.

Thanks for correcting my edits, I didn't get to the intersections part as I didn't have time, but the table is broken as of right now. I can't do anything about it because my school's IP address is blocked from editing.

[kphoger]

(For some reason, I thought Taney CH-165 continued past MO-165's northern terminus, but apparently that's not correct. ??)

https://www.google.com/maps/@36.6496105,-93.2646267,3a,15y,205.99h,90.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLp2fXP0h5dTakIeRfFD_sg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

In that case...  The terminus of MO-165 might only be sort of dangling, as the number might continue as a county highway with the same number.

[X99]

I'm trying to change it right now, that's why any errors may be popping up. I haven't done a whole lot when it comes to changes to wikipedia, so feel free to fix any mess i may have made. I have worked on the articles of 465, US-65, and 76.

So that's who 417Mario is. Alright, I can try to fix a few thi-

...runs congruent with US 65?

*keeps reading*

You marked the whole segment backwards, and put the routing change in the route description instead of the route history. It's fixed now on the 76 page, but I haven't checked the rest yet.

Thanks for correcting my edits, I didn't get to the intersections part as I didn't have time, but the table is broken as of right now. I can't do anything about it because my school's IP address is blocked from editing.

If you have a Wikipedia account, it shouldn't block you since you registered with them. I used to edit Wikipedia pages in high school all the time, mostly to fix grammar errors.

[X99]

HERE WeGo Maps shows MO 76 signed on the Highroad, but curiously still shows a 465 shield on the loop ramp at the west end. Google Maps and OSM still show the existence of MO 465.

[ozarkman417]

HERE WeGo Maps shows MO 76 signed on the Highroad, but curiously still shows a 465 shield on the loop ramp at the west end. Google Maps and OSM still show the existence of MO 465.

MODOT's traveler information map still shows the highroad as MO 465. Their mobile app relies on Google Maps, but their website is on its own.