Road Sign UNO

[ilpt4u]

Crediting billburmaster.com's page on the Dan Ryan Expressway/I-90/94

Mass 67 -> Chicago's 67th St

Sourced from http://www.billburmaster.com/rmsandw/illinois/interstate/94ryan.html

[formulanone]

CR 67 in Gridley, Illinois:

[Jim]

Any excuse to post this one for New York 67, which looks like it will remain standing through the end of the 2010s here in Amsterdam.  Taken November 5, 2016.

[US 89]

Utah 67, better known as Legacy Parkway (along with a whole lot of other shields):

[paulthemapguy]

Utah 102


UT-038-102S by Paul Drives, on Flickr

[US71]

Arkansas 102

[oscar]

Arkansas 102 => Nova Scotia 102 (posted on Halifax city street leading to the 102 freeway):

[Jim]

Massachusetts 102 with "Mass." added, on New York 22 in Canaan.  January 20, 2010.

[7/8]

Tennessee 102 (taken on I-24 in Smyrna):

[oscar]

Tennessee 102 => New Brunswick 102:

[hbelkins]

VA 102 (yes, you read that right)

2016 Bluefield Trip, Day 1-140 by H.B. Elkins, on Flickr

[paulthemapguy]

Illinois 102


IL-053-102S by Paul Drives, on Flickr

[US71]

Illinois 251

[jbnv]

Tennessee 251.

[paulthemapguy]

TN Secondary 249


TN-I-24X031W by Paul Drives, on Flickr

[jbnv]

Rule clarification question: Since the OP didn't uphold my assertion that Quebec secondary shields should be playable on Quebec autoroute shields and vice versa, it is a given that in any jurisdiction that signs routes differently based on some sort of status (primary, secondary, etc.) the signs for different systems are not interchangeable?

Asking for a friend with a bunch of Tennessee signs.

[oscar]

Tennessee 249 => Quebec 249, taken on my way to one of several visits to Asbestos:

Rule clarification question: Since the OP didn't uphold my assertion that Quebec secondary shields should be playable on Quebec autoroute shields and vice versa, it is a given that in any jurisdiction that signs routes differently based on some sort of status (primary, secondary, etc.) the signs for different systems are not interchangeable?

Might be that shield shape makes all the difference, so Tennessee rectangle markers are not interplayable with Tennessee triangle markers, whether or not they are in separate route systems.

[hotdogPi]

They're only considered to be the same if they're interchangeable, such as Louisiana's color variations, with the one exception that Texas RMs and FMs match each other.

[paulthemapguy]

Indiana 249


IN-249 by Paul Drives, on Flickr

[oscar]

What about North Dakota route markers? The state is slowly transitioning from the old Indian headress shape to one based on the state's more or less rectangular borders? Some routes will have both styles of route markers. Some Tennessee routes also mix-and-match rectangle and triangle markers.

[kphoger]

North Dakota – That's just old vs new.  They are interchangeable in that they refer to the same type of route.

Tennessee – Aren't the rectangle/triangle mismatches actually errors?

[US71]

US 249 (error for MO 249) Joplin, MO

[Jim]

New York 249 in Farnham.  August 14, 2017.

[hbelkins]

Tennessee – Aren't the rectangle/triangle mismatches actually errors?

Not necessarily. While it's true that the wrong classification is sometimes posted, the same number can change from primary to secondary, or vice versa, at an intersection. Case in point is TN 63 at US 25E south of Harrogate.

[ozarkman417]

MO 249, previously played for I-49

SM-G965U