Unique, Odd, or Interesting Signs aka The good, the bad, and the ugly

Started by mass_citizen, December 04, 2013, 10:46:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jakeroot

Quote from: roadman65 on August 13, 2022, 09:18:13 AM
Quote from: zachary_amaryllis on August 13, 2022, 03:36:11 AM
Quote from: roadman65 on August 12, 2022, 11:18:14 PM
https://goo.gl/maps/EaNKSRk8vDo7foi39
Interesting Left Turn Signal sign.

I looked at it, and yeah, the sign is ... odd. I don't really understand all the standards and what-nots, but yeah, odd.

The intersection has an odd feel to it, very NYC-y. I almost thought it was one head per lane, but I saw the other one on the pole. NYC signals always looked... 'minimalistic' to me.

New York City seems to use two left turn heads always copying California, Illinois, New Jersey, and I believe Delaware as well.  The rest of New York does not and conforms to the MUTCD.

To be clear, all of these other places that require two signals heads for turning traffic are also conforming to the MUTCD. States that just use one are simply meeting the bare-minimum MUTCD requirements.


thenetwork

Quote from: zachary_amaryllis on August 13, 2022, 03:36:11 AM
Quote from: roadman65 on August 12, 2022, 11:18:14 PM
https://goo.gl/maps/EaNKSRk8vDo7foi39
Interesting Left Turn Signal sign.

I looked at it, and yeah, the sign is ... odd. I don't really understand all the standards and what-nots, but yeah, odd.

The intersection has an odd feel to it, very NYC-y. I almost thought it was one head per lane, but I saw the other one on the pole. NYC signals always looked... 'minimalistic' to me.

It looks like the solid green signal is closer to the left-turn stop line than the two left-arrow lights and too many people turned based on the green ball signal.

Sani

My apologies if either of these have already appeared in this 300-page thread.

The effect isn't as noticeable in this photo, but the Clearview type on this sign is stretched horizontally for some reason: https://goo.gl/maps/otn8tKMWBdiyKkT19

I've noticed a few of these now... "Hey, Bob! We musta screwed up that order for the merge signs. Someone wrote down W4-6 on the order form instead of W4-3. Should we send them back?"

"Nah, Steve, too late for that. We've got these extra posts and bolts, we'll make it work." https://goo.gl/maps/aXs8jD2chuxmXavR6

roadfro

Quote from: Sani on August 14, 2022, 01:02:35 AM
I've noticed a few of these now... "Hey, Bob! We musta screwed up that order for the merge signs. Someone wrote down W4-6 on the order form instead of W4-3. Should we send them back?"

"Nah, Steve, too late for that. We've got these extra posts and bolts, we'll make it work." https://goo.gl/maps/aXs8jD2chuxmXavR6

In this case, it seems like it's a combination of right sign, wrong location and mounting. Looking upstream in Street View shows the freeway mainline has the proper added lane sign posted. This sign, if oriented correctly, is meant for the on ramp traffic to know they have an added lane, and should be mounted a little further upstream along the on ramp (so as to not be visible from the freeway).
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

Scott5114

Quote from: roadfro on August 14, 2022, 01:01:11 PM
Quote from: Sani on August 14, 2022, 01:02:35 AM
I've noticed a few of these now... "Hey, Bob! We musta screwed up that order for the merge signs. Someone wrote down W4-6 on the order form instead of W4-3. Should we send them back?"

"Nah, Steve, too late for that. We've got these extra posts and bolts, we'll make it work." https://goo.gl/maps/aXs8jD2chuxmXavR6

In this case, it seems like it's a combination of right sign, wrong location and mounting. Looking upstream in Street View shows the freeway mainline has the proper added lane sign posted. This sign, if oriented correctly, is meant for the on ramp traffic to know they have an added lane, and should be mounted a little further upstream along the on ramp (so as to not be visible from the freeway).

It could also be an instance of "this is the last sign before they hit Missouri, so who cares?"
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

plain

I find this sign both interesting and bizarre. It's a 2-way traffic sign (and another in the opposite direction), but aside from an entrance to a nearby subdivision there isn't any divided stretches of road anywhere near here.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/jyBpDzx9sup3NagY7
Newark born, Richmond bred

hotdogPi

I've seen the two-way traffic sign on roads that were previous one-way but have recently changed or when a one-way segment ends and becomes two-way.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13,44,50
MA 22,40,107,109,117,119,126,141,159
NH 27, 111A(E); CA 133; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, QC 162, 165, 263; UK A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; FR95 D316

Lowest untraveled: 25 (updated from 14)

New: MA 14, 123

FrCorySticha

Just a theory, but could the state be using this location for a trial with the two way traffic and lights on for safety unisign? Are there other locations throughout the state where they post them?

plain

The only thing I can think of so far is being that this is near a nuclear power station, they wanted to emphasize that this is a standard 2-way road in case something happens and people start panicking when evacuating. But everything around there is the same type of road so IDK.
Newark born, Richmond bred

Dirt Roads

Quote from: plain on August 16, 2022, 11:22:21 AM
The only thing I can think of so far is being that this is near a nuclear power station, they wanted to emphasize that this is a standard 2-way road in case something happens and people start panicking when evacuating. But everything around there is the same type of road so IDK.

All of SR-652 (Kentucky Springs Road) and VA-208 west of there, along most of US-522 have been upgraded for the movement of hazardous materials.  I think that the zigzag route from Bumpass Road to the Ladysmith exit on I-95 has been partially upgraded as well, but it not as commonly traveled.  I've travelled all of these routes many times, just to check out the scenery around Lake Anna from various angles.

ErmineNotyours

Quote from: plain on August 16, 2022, 10:26:03 AM
I find this sign both interesting and bizarre. It's a 2-way traffic sign (and another in the opposite direction), but aside from an entrance to a nearby subdivision there isn't any divided stretches of road anywhere near here.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/jyBpDzx9sup3NagY7

This example very close to me was a curiosity at first.  It's always been two way.  But then despite the sign I saw someone drive down the left side of the street.  Maybe there's something about the traffic light mounting that confuses drivers to think it's one-way.

Big John

^^ Panning up to the traffic light, I find this sign, signifying no to a lower dual left: https://goo.gl/maps/xZfPY7PnDtAehEgb6

jakeroot

Quote from: Big John on August 17, 2022, 11:47:16 AM
^^ Panning up to the traffic light, I find this sign, signifying no to a lower dual left: https://goo.gl/maps/xZfPY7PnDtAehEgb6

Yes, access to north-westbound 1st is limited to traffic from southbound Bronson Way and southbound Park Ave. This is because traffic from Park Ave has a green at the same time as the left from northbound Bronson Way.

CoreySamson

Buc-ee's and QuikTrip fanboy. Clincher of FM roads. Proponent of the TX U-turn.

My Route Log
My Clinches

Now on mobrule and Travel Mapping!

JoePCool14


:) Needs more... :sombrero: Not quite... :bigass: Perfect.
JDOT: We make the world a better place to drive.
Travel Mapping | 60+ Clinches | 260+ Traveled | 8000+ Miles Logged

Amtrakprod

Roadgeek, railfan, and crossing signal fan. From Massachusetts, and in high school. Youtube is my website link. Loves FYAs signals. Interest in Bicycle Infrastructure. Owns one Leotech Pedestrian Signal, and a Safetran Type 1 E bell.

Scott5114

uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

Bruce

No volcanic eruptions allowed near Castle Rock, unless you use Exit 49.



(Actual context: this is at Exit 49, so drivers would need to re-enter I-5 to reach the correct exit for the Mt St Helens National Volcanic Monument, which uses this icon)

plain

Yeah they could've done something different. What a weird sign!
Newark born, Richmond bred

LilianaUwU

Quote from: Bruce on August 22, 2022, 09:48:11 PM
No volcanic eruptions allowed near Castle Rock, unless you use Exit 49.



Dang it, I planned having volcanic eruptions off of exit 36 this weekend!
"Volcano with no fire... Not volcano... Just mountain."
—Mr. Thwomp

My pronouns are she/her. Also, I'm an admin on the AARoads Wiki.

D-Dey65

I've been trying to find that thread on the Do Not Enter signs with additional messages, but I still can't find it, so I'm adding my post here.

You won't find a Do Not Enter sign or a Stop sign like this anywhere in the USA;
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.9116415,-73.7869083,3a,75y,120.88h,89.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sM1BhcHi6Ivu8XOXt7aXFfQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en
Unless you drive along Washington Avenue next to the St. Gabriel & St. Joseph Church in New Rochelle, New York.

ErmineNotyours


7/8

Quote from: D-Dey65 on August 23, 2022, 12:27:54 AM
I've been trying to find that thread on the Do Not Enter signs with additional messages, but I still can't find it, so I'm adding my post here.

You won't find a Do Not Enter sign or a Stop sign like this anywhere in the USA;
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.9116415,-73.7869083,3a,75y,120.88h,89.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sM1BhcHi6Ivu8XOXt7aXFfQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=en
Unless you drive along Washington Avenue next to the St. Gabriel & St. Joseph Church in New Rochelle, New York.

The sign on Union is even worse (it's a Do Not Enter sign with text saying that this is the Church Entrance)! https://maps.app.goo.gl/Ru6joDzf9oNA6At69

Mr. Matté

I-763 in Philly (down the street from I-694)


I-73 Food Mart & Smoke Shop, on NJ Route 73 (I know we used to have a thread about businesses and route shields in logos but it's prob. pretty old at this point)

tylert120

The PA Turnpike exit for PIT Int'l (exit 10) forgot the -h on Pittsburgh  :-/




Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.