AARoads Forum

National Boards => General Highway Talk => Topic started by: hotdogPi on January 23, 2019, 07:39:50 AM

Title: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on January 23, 2019, 07:39:50 AM
This question came up in the joke thread about even-numbered county routes, but this is a legitimate topic.

Positive integers, obviously.

The thread title is slightly misleading taken literally. Taken literally, it would be 1 for everyone except those that have been on every single Route 1, but that's not what I meant.

For me: 14.
US 1 (several states)
MA 2 and less than a mile of US 2 (VT)
US/MA 3 and a single block of PA 3
US 4 (NH) and MA 4
US 5 (and probably I-5, but I wasn't a roadgeek in 2011*)
US 6 via overlap with I-84 (CT)
NY 7 via overlap with I-88
GA 8 (US 29)
NH 9, MA 9, GA 9
NH 10 via overlap with I-89, also GA 10 (US 78)
NH 11 and US 11 (NY), both on overlaps
MA/NH 12
NY 13 and a short segment of US 13 (PA)

I've crossed CT 14 and VT 14 on freeways, but I haven't been on either. MA 14 is closer, though. The lowest number I haven't been on or crossed is 24, which is surprising since MA 24 is a freeway. (Update 3/14/19: I have now been on MA 24. The lowest I haven't been on or crossed now is 36.)

*I visited the San Diego Zoo on a trip that I arrived in Los Angeles by train, and my relative's house was in Irvine. I don't see how I could have gotten there any other reasonable way.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on January 23, 2019, 08:11:19 AM
For me it's 48.  I've been on IL 21 and US 34 in Illinois, and I've hit all the other numbers from 1 to 47 in Indiana.

48 and 97 are the only numbers < 100 that I'm missing.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on January 23, 2019, 08:59:12 AM
For me is incredibily low: 5. Also the lowest I've never crossed. I've never been to a route numbered 3 in Spain, but have done so elsewhere (Portuguese A3, Italian RA 3).

Edit: Just remembered I went on TF-5 freeway in Tenerife, Canary Islands when I was only 5. I know I traveled on then-A-16 (now C-32) in Catalonia when I was 2. So the lowest numbered route I haven't been on is 18, and I don't know of any routes with that number near me. I have 17 thanks to that C-17/C-25 concurrency.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ipeters61 on January 23, 2019, 09:13:17 AM
28 for me.  Can't think of any state whose Route 28 I've actually been on, though I did drive on ALT WV-28 briefly once, but I don't think that counts.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadgeekteen on January 23, 2019, 09:44:43 AM
Quote from: 1 on January 23, 2019, 07:39:50 AM
This question came up in the joke thread about even-numbered county routes, but this is a legitimate topic.

Positive integers, obviously.

The thread title is slightly misleading taken literally. Taken literally, it would be 1 for everyone except those that have been on every single Route 1, but that's not what I meant.

For me: 14.
US 1 (several states)
MA 2 and less than a mile of US 2 (VT)
US/MA 3 and a single block of PA 3
US 4 (NH) and MA 4
US 5 (and probably I-5, but I wasn't a roadgeek in 2011*)
US 6 via overlap with I-84 (CT)
NY 7 via overlap with I-88
GA 8 (US 29)
NH 9, MA 9, GA 9
NH 10 via overlap with I-89, also GA 10 (US 78)
NH 11 and US 11 (NY), both on overlaps
MA/NH 12
NY 13 and a short segment of US 13 (PA)

I've crossed CT 14 and VT 14 on freeways, but I haven't been on either. MA 14 is closer, though. The lowest number I haven't been on or crossed is 24, which is surprising since MA 24 is a freeway.

*I visited the San Diego Zoo on a trip that I arrived in Los Angeles by train, and my relative's house was in Irvine. I don't see how I could have gotten there any other reasonable way.
Amazingly, it might be 14, though I think I have been on one but I have no clear memories of it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Eth on January 23, 2019, 09:47:19 AM
47.

Incomplete list of covered routes:
CA 1; MD 2; MA 3; I-4; MD 5; GA 6; VA 7; GA 8; NH 9; I-10; US 11; GA 12; US 13; GA 14; CT 15; WV 16; US 17; GA 18; SC 19; FL 20; LA 21; CA 22; PA 23; GA 24; US 25; I-26; AL 27; NC 28; US 29; GA 30; US 31; GA 32; VA 33; CT 34; GA 35; LA 36; Iceland Route 37; GA 38; PA 39; AL 40; US 41; GA 42; Iceland Route 43; FL 44; GA 45; US 46

After 47, my next gap is at 57, then 63, 67, 88, and 96 are my other missing ones under 100.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Buck87 on January 23, 2019, 09:57:15 AM
Mine is 34

edit: Though I just realized this isn't the case if County Roads are included
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on January 23, 2019, 10:01:07 AM
268, 348, 357, 367, 398, 428, 456, 479, 549, 554, 558, 577, 578, 668; 864.

Now available in County Road FreeSM flavor!
* for a limited time
























































































US 1US 2US 3I-4I-5US 6US 7US 8US 9I-10
US 11US 12US 13I-14I-15I-16US 17US 18US 19US 20
US 21I-22US 23US 24I-25I-26US 27SC 28US 29I-30
US 31GA 32FL 33US 34I-35AL 36I-37IL 38FL 39I-40
US 41US 42US 43US 44US 45US 46MN 47MS 48I-49US 50
US 51US 52AL 53US 54I-55TN 56GA 57US 58I-59US 60
US 61US 62US 63US 64I-65I-66US 67US 68I-69US 70
US 71US 72I-73US 74I-75I-76I-77I-78I-79I-80
I-81US 82I-83US 84I-85I-86I-87I-88I-89I-90
I-91US 92I-93I-94I-95US 96I-97US 98I-99FL 100
US 101RI 102RI 103NY 104ME 105NY 106GA 107TN 108AL 109TN 110
TX 111GA 112US 113RI 114LA 115IL 116US 117MD 118US 119FL 120
FL 121TN 122US 123WA 124M-125FL 126SD 127MA 128US 129TX 130
US 131AL 132NY 133VA 134GA 135MA 136CT 137GA 138NJ 139I-140
GA 141NY 142AZ 143AL 144MS 145RI 146NC 147VA 148IA 149AL 150
SC 151OK 152SC 153GA 154FL 155IN 156AL 157US 158US 159IA 160
OH 161OH 162CA 163VA 164OH 165GA 166US 167OH 168US 169SC 170
IL 171MS 172OH 173TX 174LA 175AL 176KY 177GA 178AL 179US 180
US 181LA 182TX 183MS 184I-185CT 186IA 187AL 188MA 189I-190
CT 191US 192WV 193I-194I-195K-196CA 197MS 198TX 199FL 200
US 201US 202WA 203AL 204I-205US 206ME 207AL 208US 209ND 210
AL 211US 212AL 213WV 214AL 215AB 216AL 217US 218AL 219US 220
US 221FL 222US 223US 224I-225FL 226IN 227FL 228OH 229FL 230
US 231IN 232NY 233KY 234I-235KY 236OH 237MN 238AL 239I-240
OH 241AR 242FL 243I-244MS 245TN 246VA 247TN 248TX 249US 250
AL 251TN 252TN 253K-254AL 255Loop 256OH 257US 258US 259TN 260
AL 261IN 262FL 263AR 264CA 265MO 266VA 267TN 268MO 269I-270
I-271MD 272AL 273TN 274I-275I-276I-277US 278AR 279US 280
US 281OH 282PA 283GA 284I-285CT 286AL 287VA 288FL 289I-290
OH 291FL 292I-293I-294I-295SC 296AL 297TN 298GA 299GA 300
US 301US 302OH 303MS 304OH 305OH 306PA 307LA 308PA 309I-310
US 311FL 312MD 313GA 314OH 315GA 316TX 317NY 318US 319TX 320
US 321US 322Loop 323GA 324GA 325FL 326IN 327MS 328PA 329IA 330
US 331PA 332TN 333TN 334TN 335MN 336CT 337KY 338TX 339US 340
US 341NY 342AR 343Loop 344KY 345MD 346LA 347KY 348CT 349NY 350
TX 351NY 352LA 353GA 354MD 355PA 356TN 357TX 358I-359US 360
MD 361FM 362FL 363MO 364GA 365FL 366MS 367 KY 368GA 369NY 370
US 371CT 372TN 373PA 374I-375I-376US 377US 378TN 379I-380
SC 381AL 382NY 383TN 384US 385TN 386WY 387MS 388FL 389FL 390
FL 391TN 392I-393I-394I-395TN 396TN 397KY 398TN 399FL 400
US 401MD 402SC 403NY 404I-405FL 406FL 407FL 408NY 409I-410
US 411US 412PA 413NY 414IA 415PA 416FL 417PA 418FL 419ON 420
US 421US 422NM 423LA 424US 425NY 426LA 427FM 428FL 429FL 430
US 431LA 432NY 433TN 434OH 435FL 436LA 437LA 438NJ 439I-440
US 441FL 442LA 443TN 444LA 445KY 446LA 447MS 448LA 449WY 450
FM 451TN 452PA 453MD 454FM 455PA 456TN 457MD 458I-459US 460
FM 461TN 462MS 463KY 464I-465NM 466KY 467MS 468I-469I-470
I-471MD 472NM 473NY 474I-475I-476PA 477Loop 478LA 479I-480
I-481FL 482FL 483Loop 484I-485LA 486PA 487MD 488MD 489I-490
KY 491KY 492MS 493I-494I-495MS 496MD 497LA 498FM 499 NM 500
US 501PA 502Spur 503MS 504I-505KY 506FL 507FL 508WA 509I-510
MS 511WA 512FL 513FL 514GA 515FM 516FM 517PA 518FL 519FL 520
US 521US 522OH 523FL 524WA 525I-526WV 527FL 528FM 529I-530
NY 531PA 532LA 533OH 534FL 535KY 536Spur 537LA 538FL 539I-540
MS 541OH 542MD 543MD 544LA 545OH 546OH 547FL 548FL 549US 550
PA 551FL 552FL 553KY 554I-555MS 556Spur 557LA 558FL 559AB 560
Loop 561MD 562FL 563AB 564I-565FM 566AB 567FL 568FL 569FL 570
OH 571FL 572FL 573FL 574I-575PA 576KY 577KY 578 FL 579FL 580
I-581FL 582FL 583FL 584I-585FL 586I-587Spur 588FL 589FL 590
MD 591NV 592NV 593FL 594I-595KY 596FL 597MS 598MN 599VA 600
US 601OH 602MS 603MS 604AL 605OH 606FL 607OH 608MS 609I-610
LA 611MS 612MS 613FL 614FL 615FL 616MS 617FL 618MS 619FL 620
VA 621WV 622MD 623FM 624VA 625LA 626LA 627LA 628VA 629I-630
FM 631MD 632AB 633VA 634I-635FL 636VA 637MD 638MD 639I-640
US 641VA 642OH 643VA 644VA 645PA 646VA 647MD 648FM 649MD 650
OH 651MD 652VA 653VA 654FL 655OH 656VA 657MD 658FL 659KY 660
VA 671VA 672MD 673OH 674I-675I-676LA 677I-678FL 679I-680
FL 681FL 682VA 683I-684FL 685FL 686FL 687FL 688VA 689PA 690
I-691VA 692FL 693I-694I-695I-696VA 697FM 698FL 699OH 700
US 701MD 702SC 703FL 704I-705FL 706FL 707FL 708VA 709FL 710
VA 711MD 712FL 713FL 714FL 715FL 716FL 717PA 718VA 719MS 720
VA 721MS 722OH 723FM 724VA 725KY 726MS 727MS 728FL 729US 730
VA 731FL 732VA 733FM 734VA 735FL 736LA 737VA 738FL 739MS 740
OH 741NC 742MS 743MO 744OH 745VA 746NY 747VA 748KY 749FL 750
NC 751MO 752KY 753VA 754VA 755KY 756VA 757MD 758I-759PA 760
VA 761OH 762MD 763KY 764MD 765AB 766VA 767OH 768VA 769PA 770
VA 771NC 772VA 773FM 774VA 775FL 776AB 777VA 778AB 779KY 780
I-781LA 782-2AB 783LA 784I-785FL 786I-787KY 788FL 789I-790
MS 791MS 792VA 793WI 794OH 795VA 796AB 797LA 798-2LA 799FL 800
NC 801FL 802VA 803FL 804I-805FL 806FL 807FL 808FL 809FL 810
FL 811FL 812FM 813FL 814MD 815FL 816FL 817FL 818PA 819I-820
FL 821FL 822FL 823FL 824FL 825FL 826FL 827FM 828FM 829AB 830
AB 831MD 832MD 833FL 834OH 835FL 836PA 837FL 838PA 839I-840
KY 841FL 842VA 843FL 844FL 845FM 846FL 847FL 848FL 849FL 850
PA 851FL 852VA 853FL 854VA 855FL 856WV 857FL 858KY 859FL 860
PA 861FL 862PA 863---FL 865---FL 867---FL 869FL 870


Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Super Mateo on January 23, 2019, 10:04:31 AM
Only considering numbers ≤ 20, let's see:

1:  US, IL, IN
2:  IN, NC
3:  IN (via US 6 overlap)
4: 
5:  IL, NC (both short and easily done in full in less than an hour)
6:  US
7:  IL
8:  IL
9:  IL, IN, KY, SC
10:  KY
11:  US
12:  US
13:  IN
14:  US
15:  US
16:  WV (via US 52 overlap)
17:  IL
18:  US
19:  US, IL
20:  US

Looks like my answer is 4.  I can't think of a single route 4 I've been on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jp the roadgeek on January 23, 2019, 10:22:24 AM
I'll do a few for the states near me (suffixed routes excluded) :

CT: 19
MA: 4
RI: 7
NY: 2 (US and NY)
VT: 3 (been on 2 but never drove it)
NH: 2 (US), 13 (state)
ME: 2 (US), 3 (state)
NJ: 7
PA: 5
DE: 3
MD: 4


To break it down:
1: US, DE
2: CT, MA, RI, DE, MD, US (as passenger)
3: CT, MA, RI, NJ, PA, MD, US
4: CT, RI, NJ, DE, US, I (as a passenger)
5: RI, NY, FL (as a passenger), US
6: US
7: NY, MD, VA, US
8: CT, MA
9: CT, MA, VT, NH, VA, WV, FL (as a passenger), US
10: CT, MA, NH, PA, MD, I
11: CT, VT, NH, ME, US
12: CT, MA, NH, VT (as a passenger), NJ, PA.  Passed the eastern terminus of I
13: US
14: CT, RI
15: CT, Old MA, VT (as a passenger), US
16: CT, MA, NH
17: CT, NY, NJ, MD
18: NJ
19: none
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dfilpus on January 23, 2019, 11:26:51 AM
For me, its 149. I have traveled on most NC state highways, Interstates and US highways with route numbers up to 100.
NC 149 is a very short stub that serves an industrial area down east, so one only drives on it deliberately to clinch the highway.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on January 23, 2019, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Super Mateo on January 23, 2019, 10:04:31 AM
Only considering numbers ≤ 20, let's see:

1:  US, IL, IN
2:  IN, NC
3:  IN (via US 6 overlap)
4: 
5:  IL, NC (both short and easily done in full in less than an hour)
6:  US
7:  IL
8:  IL
9:  IL, IN, KY, SC
10:  KY
11:  US
12:  US
13:  IN
14:  US
15:  US
16:  WV (via US 52 overlap)
17:  IL
18:  US
19:  US, IL
20:  US

Looks like my answer is 4.  I can't think of a single route 4 I've been on.

You need to visit Potato Creek State Park this summer.  Nice park plus it gets 4 for you.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hurricane Rex on January 23, 2019, 12:15:56 PM
1 is the lowest I haven't been on as OR and WA 1 don't exist, and the other states I don't spend nearly enough time to pay attention. Unless you want to count going to the sun road as Glacier Route 1.

LG-TP260

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: sparker on January 23, 2019, 12:21:36 PM
For a number encompassing any type of highway, for me it would have to be 102.  At present, there's no CA 102, and I can't recall actually traveling on any route of that number anywhere (US or Canada).  It almost was 48, since CA 48 became CA 37 before I got my drivers' license, and while crossing it at its US 40 terminus several times, never had the opportunity to travel on it pre-'64.  But I did drive on the interim US 48 freeway back in 1989, a couple of years before it was elevated to I-68, so I really can't count that as a "no-show".  So 102 it is.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on January 23, 2019, 12:29:56 PM
Doing a bunch of text searches through my Travel Mapping list file, the lowest route number for which I don't have any entries anywhere (including Canada) is 379.

296 and 345 would've broken my sequence, except I traveled the unsigned Interstates with those numbers.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Super Mateo on January 23, 2019, 12:30:46 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on January 23, 2019, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: Super Mateo on January 23, 2019, 10:04:31 AM
Only considering numbers ≤ 20, let's see:

1:  US, IL, IN
2:  IN, NC
3:  IN (via US 6 overlap)
4: 
5:  IL, NC (both short and easily done in full in less than an hour)
6:  US
7:  IL
8:  IL
9:  IL, IN, KY, SC
10:  KY
11:  US
12:  US
13:  IN
14:  US
15:  US
16:  WV (via US 52 overlap)
17:  IL
18:  US
19:  US, IL
20:  US

Looks like my answer is 4.  I can't think of a single route 4 I've been on.

You need to visit Potato Creek State Park this summer.  Nice park plus it gets 4 for you.

Thanks for the suggestion.  I like the idea.  According to Google, it's only about an hour and a half from me, just a little longer than Starved Rock going the opposite direction.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Truvelo on January 23, 2019, 12:42:40 PM
If I take just US and Interstates then the lowest of both I've never been on is 2. I've crossed US 2 on two separate occasions but don't recall ever been on it. I-2 is something I will never get to use unless I have a very specific reason to travel that far south.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadgeekteen on January 23, 2019, 01:45:38 PM
For just US and interstate than it would be 8.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on January 23, 2019, 02:05:24 PM
Looking through my TM list file, there are only two route numbers less than 100 that I haven't used: 46, and 57. 47 also doesn't show up in my TM log, but I know I traveled a portion of NM 47 north of Albuquerque before that segment was decommissioned.

EDIT: traveled parts of UT 21, 73, 81, and 94 since I posted this.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on January 23, 2019, 02:30:05 PM
102 is the first nation-spanning number that unscientifically comes to mind for me. But there's a chance I may have been on ME 102 having made two visits to Mount Desert Island as a teen, so that could be incorrect as well.

54 is the lowest number within Minnesota that I have not used.

Only have to go to 15 to find a Wisconsin route I have yet to use.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dvferyance on January 23, 2019, 02:38:47 PM
As far as a Wisconsin route goes it will have to be 17 because I-43 used to be 15. Interstate it is 2 and US also 2.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on January 23, 2019, 03:46:06 PM
Mine appears to be 22.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: DandyDan on January 23, 2019, 04:41:49 PM
For me, it's 102, but by current designations, it's 49, as the only Highway 49 I've ever been on is MN 49, but that was when I was a kid and MN 49 has been gone for a while now.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ben114 on January 23, 2019, 04:47:54 PM
For me it's 8, second would be 19.
(Up to 20 included)
1: US 1
2: MA, RI & CT 2
3: MA & US 3
4: RI 4, MA 4 & I-4
5: US 5
6: US 6
7: US 7
8:
9: MA & UT 9
10: RI 10 & I-10
11: I-11
12: MA 12 & CT 12
13: MA 13
14: MA 14
15: I-15, CT 15 & RI 15
16: MA 16
17: UT 17 & I-17
18: MA 18
19:
20: US 20
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on January 23, 2019, 10:06:34 PM
For me I believe the lowest number I have not driven is 266.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: wxfree on January 23, 2019, 10:54:23 PM
My answer is 9.  I've been on:

OK 1
Texas Park Roads 2 and 3
Farm to Market Roads 4 and 5
TX 6 and 7
FM 8

I've been on I-10, but I think I also haven't been on any 11.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 23, 2019, 11:37:21 PM
Not for the first time, a thread here has resulted in me writing a little program to extract information from TM.

To answer our question at hand, the lowest number for which I have no entries in my TM .list file is 48.  I know I've seen US 48 signs on I-81, but I guess I've never driven it.  Something to do next time I'm down that way.  My second-lowest missing number is 135.  I've passed both ends of I-135, but never traveled it.

The program can read any TM .list file and produce a report like the one below, which is generated from my .list.  It shows all unique TM route names that contain each number.  It does not account for detected concurrencies since it uses only the .list, not the TM database.  Any route name with no number is grouped under 0.  It would not handle correctly at this time cases like a route number with two numbers separated by some non-numeric character.  A route "73-1" would come out under 731.  It also happily includes routes that are not part of TM like a few Texas FM roads I've listed just in case we add them some day.

If anyone else would like a report generated on their .list file, I'm happy to run them.

0=[ParkRd, LoopRd, PetForRd, PenaBlvd, SouRimDr, MilPkwy, FLTpk, MainParkRd, VetPkwy, ChaCraRd, CraRd, CraRimDr, AudPkwy, CaveCityRd, MamCavePkwy, LakePonCswy, BalWasPkwy, MTAppRd, ScaCon, CadSumRd, ParkLpRd, NEEntRd, NEntRd, WEntRd, RalChaExpy, BlueRidPkwy, CliDomeRd, CliDomeRdCli, CliDomeRdLuf, LinFalRd, EastRivRd, SceLpDr, EveTpk, AtlCityExpy, GarStaPkwy, NJTpk, PalIntPkwy, DunDr, BeltPkwy, BerCon, BroRivPkwy, CroCouPkwy, FDRooDr, GraCenPkwy, HenHudPkwy, HarRivDr, HutRivPkwy, LakeOntPkwy, MosPkwy, SawMillPkwy, SprBroPkwy, TacStaPkwy, WanStaPkwy, IndNatTpk, JohnKilTpk, CraCrkRd, CraLakeRimDr, CraLakeHwy, CenScrExp, AutoTrk, BadLpRd, CliDomeRdCol, CliDomeRdNew, ArcSceDr, BriViewDr, IslSkySceDr, SteCynRd, DevTowRd, EEntRd, GraLpRd, NorCynRd, RocMemPkwy, SEntRd, TetParkRd, ONQEW, ONGar, TCHMai, TCHYel, TCHOtt]
1=[I-A1, I-H1, US1, US1AltBan, US1BypPor, US1AltYor, US1AltPro, US1TrkJer, US1BusPen, US1AltWas, US1BusSan, US1BusStA, AK1, AR1, CA1, DE1, FLA1AFor, FLA1A, FLA1AFer, IN1, MA1ANor, MA1ASal, MI1, MN1, NH1A, NM1, NASA1, TXLp1, AB1ALak, NB1, YT1, YT1Wat]
2=[I-A2, I-2, I-H2, US2AltOro, US2, US2BusMon, US2TrkSSJ, US2Iro, US2BusEGr, US2BusGrF, AK2, CA2, CO2, CT2, CT2A, IA2, IN2, MA2, MA2AShe, MA2AGre, MA2ACam, MD2, NE2, NE2Lin, NE2BusNeb, NE2BusGra, NY2, OH2, VA2, VT2A, AB2, BC2, NB2, NS2, YT2, B2r]
3=[I-H3, US3, AK3, GA3, IA3, IL3, MA3, MA3APly, MD3, ME3, MI3, NH3AFra, NH3AMan, NJ3, NY3, OH3, OK3, VA3, WA3, A3]
4=[I-A4, I-4, US4, US4BusRut, AK4, DE4, IL4, KS4, MA4, MD4, ME4, NJ4, NM4, OH4, RI4, VT4A, WA4, M4, A4]
5=[I-5, US5, GA5, IA5, KS5, MD5, ME5, MI5, MN5, NY5, NY5TrkSch, NY5A, NY5B, NY5S, PA5, RI5, A-5]
6=[US6, US6BusCar, US6BusWar, US6AltRoc, US6HisAtl, US6N, DE6, MA6AYar, MA6APro, MD6, MN6, ON6, NS6]
7=[US7, AR7, DE7, MA7ALen, MS7, NM7, NY7, NY7A, NY7B, OH7, OK7, RI7, VA7, VT7A, WA7]
8=[I-8, AK8, CT8, MA8, MA8ANor, MA8ACha, NY8, PA8, SC8, TXLp8, VT8, VT8A, WA8, A8]
9=[US9, US9TrkJer, US9W, CO9, CT9, FL9BJac, IA9, IN9, MA9, ME9, ME9AKen, NH9, NY9A, NY9D, NY9G, NY9H, NY9J, NY9N, NY9P, NY9R, SC9, VT9, WA9, A9]
10=[I-10, I-10BLBen, I-10BLBly, I-10BLDem, I-10BLFor, US10, CT10, DE10, GA10, KS10, MA10, NH10, NH10A, NY10, NY10A, OH10, RI10, VT10A, A-10]
11=[I-11, US11, US11TrkBri, US11AltRoa, US11E, US11W, FL11, HI11, ME11, MN11, NH11, NM11, NY11B, OH11, TX11, VT11, WI11, ON11, SK11, B11, B11a]
12=[I-12, US12, CA12, CT12, FL12, IA12, MA12, MD12, NC12, NH12, NY12, NY12A, NY12B, VT12, A12, SS12Ste]
13=[US13, US13BusSal, CO13, MA13, NH13, NY13, WI13, A-13, A13]
14=[US14, US14AltDea, US14AltPow, KS14, MI14, NM14, NY14, NY14A, OH14, UT14, VT14]
15=[I-15, I-15BLMes, I-15BLPar, I-15BLCed, US15, US15BusGet, US15BusWar, CT15, DE15, FL15A, ME15, NY15, NY15A, VT15, WI15, A-15, NB15]
16=[I-16, US16, US16TrkRap, US16AltCus, IL16, MA16, MD16, MN16, NH16, NY16, WA16]
17=[I-17, US17, US17BusFre, US17BusTrkEli, US17BusWlm, US17BusMyr, US17AltSum, US17TrkOrl, CO17, ME17, NJ17, NM17, NY17Bin, NY17Swa, NY17, TN17, VT17, ON17]
18=[US18, IN18, KS18, MN18, NJ18, NY18, OH18, PA18, WA18]
19=[I-19, US19TrkPit, US19, US19TrkBri, US19W, US19BusAsh, US19BusMur, US19BusAlb, US19AltStP, FL19, HI19, IL19, IN19, OH19]
20=[I-20, I-20BSFlo, US20, US20BusSou, US20BusSio, US20BusSSC, CA20, CT20, DE20, FL20, FL20Gai, MA20ASpr, MO20, SC20, TXLp20, A-20, E20]
21=[US21, FL21, GA21, MA21, NY21, OH21, ON21]
22=[I-22, US22, CT22, CT22TrkHam, MI22, NY22, NY22A, VT22A, A22]
23=[US23, US23BusAnn, US23BusAsh, FL23, GA23, MA23, MN23, MO23, NY23, NY23A, NY23B, PA23, WI23]
24=[I-24, I-24Cha, US24, FL24, MA24, MD24, ME24, ME24BusBru, NC24, RI24, VA24, WY24, ON24]
25=[I-25, I-25BLTru, I-25BLSoc, I-25BLBel, I-25BLBuf, I-25BLChe, US25, US25W, US25BusAug, US25BypSta, CT25, GA25ConSav, GA25, ID25, IA25, IN25, MA25, MD25, MN25, NH25, NH25A, NH25B, NY25A, OH25, VT25, VT25A, WI25, A-25, M25]
26=[I-26, I-26Fau, I-26FutAsh, US26, FL26, ME26, MI26, NM26, NY26, TX26]
27=[I-27, US27, US27AltPer, AR27, IA27, KS27, LA27, MD27, ME27, MN27, NY27]
28=[CA28, GA28, MA28, MD28, MI28, NC28, NH28, NH28AMan, NH28BypMan, NV28, NY28, NY28N, PA28TrkBro, SC28, VA28]
29=[I-29, I-29BLStJ, US29, US29BusWar, CA29, FL29, NJ29, NY29, NY29A, PA29, WI29]
30=[I-30, US30, CO30, CT30, FL30, GA30, HI30, MA30, MN30, MO30, NY30, NY30TrkSch, NY30A, VT30, A-30]
31=[US31, US31BusSou, US31BusPer, US31W, US31E, CT31, FL31, MA31, NE31, NH31, NJ31, NY31]
32=[CT32, HI32, MA32, MD32, ME32, MI32, NC32, NY32, WI32]
33=[US33, IL33, MA33, NY33, NY33A, PA33]
34=[US34, NY34, OR34, SD34]
35=[I-35, I-35W, I-35E, I-35Gai, I-35Far, I-35BLLar, US35, FL35, ME35, NY35, OR35, TX35, TX35BusRoc, VT35, WI35, A-35]
36=[US36, HI36, HI36A, MN36, NJ36, NM36, NY36, PA36, TN36]
37=[I-37, CA37, GA37, HI37, IN37, MI37, MN37, SD37, VA37]
38=[IA38, MI38, MN38, NY38, NY38A, WI38]
39=[I-39, MI39, PA39, UT39]
40=[I-40, I-40BLSel, I-40BLFla, I-40BLWin, I-40BSWin, I-40BLHol, I-40BLNee, I-40BLGal, I-40BLGra, I-40BLMor, I-40BLSan, I-40BLTuc, I-40BLAma, I-40BLSha, US40, CT40, FL40, GA40, MA40, NY40, VA40, A-40, M40, A40]
41=[I-41, US41, US41AltNas, US41BusTam, CO41, CT41, MA41, NY41, OH41]
42=[US42, CT42, GA42, NJ42, WI42, WI42BusStu, Rte42]
43=[I-43, MA43, MD43, MN43, MO43, NC43, NY43, OH43, AB43]
44=[I-44, I-44BLJop, US44, FL44, MN44, OH44, PA44, SD44, VT44, SS44]
45=[I-45, I-45BLCor, US45, NC45, NM45, SD45]
46=[US46, FL46, GA46, IN46, NY46, VA46]
47=[IL47, MA47, MN47, NM47, WI47]
49=[I-49, I-49FutNIb, I-49FutFra, I-49FutMor, US49, CA49, LA49, NC49, NH49, NY49, OH49, TX49, ON49]
50=[US50, US50BusSal, US50BusKno, US50BusGar, US50BusPue, US50AltFer, US50BusCar, US50AltPol, FL50, NC50, NY50, SD50, A-50]
51=[US51, IN51, MN51, MO51, NC51, NM51, NY51, OH51, PA51, SC51Pin]
52=[US52BypJam, US52, US52Ken, US52TrkBlu, NM52, NY52, PA52]
53=[US53, IL53, OH53]
54=[US54, US54BusTuc, US54BusAla, DE54Del, FL54, MD54, MD54Del, NC54, NY54, NY54A, VA54, WI54]
55=[I-55, I-55BLSpr, I-55BLNew, I-55BLCry, CA55, ID55, IN55, MI55, MN55, NC55, L55K, NJ55, NM55, NY55, VA55, WI55, A-55]
56=[US56, FL56, NY56, UT56]
57=[I-57, CA57, GA57, MA57, NC57, NJ57, OH57, SC57, WI57, WI57BusStu]
58=[US58, US58BusSou, US58BusDan, US58AltAbi, MN58, TN58Cha]
59=[I-59, US59, NM59, NY59]
60=[US60, US60AltLou, CA60, FL60, GA60, GA60SprMin, IA60, MA60, MN60, NC60, NY60, OH60, PA60]
61=[US61, AZ61, HI61, KY61, MN61, NY61, ON61]
62=[US62, US62BusNia, US62ElP, MN62, OR62]
63=[US63, US63BusOtt, CO63, CT63, HI63, NH63, NY63, PA63, SD63]
64=[I-64, US64, US64AltBet, US64BusWen, US64BusPit, US64TrkHen, AZ64, FL64, HI64, IL64, MI64, NY64]
65=[I-65, US65, US65BusMar, CA65Ros, IN65, MN65, PA65, WI65]
66=[I-66, AZ66, US66HisKen, IN66, KS66, MI66, MO66, US66HisAlb, NY66, PA66, TN66Sev]
67=[US67, CT67, IN67, NY67, VT67, VT67A]
68=[I-68, CA68, CT68, MI68, NM68, UT68]
69=[I-69, I-69Whe, I-69ERob, I-69E, I-69C, I-69W, I-69FutMem, US69, US69AltBax, US69BusChe, CT69, KY69, NY69]
70=[I-70, I-70BLCol, I-70BLDen, I-70BLGra, US70, US70S, US70BusHot, US70BusAla, CA70, CT70, FL70, KY70Cam, MA70, MD70]
71=[I-71, US71, CT71, DE71, FL71, IL71, MA71, NY71, TX71, UT71]
72=[I-72, US72Cha, US72, US72AltDec, CT72, DE72, HI72, MI72]
73=[I-73, I-73FutMad, GA73, MN73, NJ73, NY73, SD73, WI73, A-73]
74=[I-74, I-74Hig, I-74FutLau, US74, US74AltAsh, CT74, MO74, NY74, PA74]
75=[I-75, I-75BLGay, I-75BSSau, US75, US75BusSio, US75BusNeb, US75AltTul, CT75, MA75, NY75, UT75, MB75]
76=[I-76, I-76BLFMo, I-76BSAtw, US76, US76BusSum, MN76, VA76]
77=[I-77, US77, US77BusSin, US77BusBro, ME77, MI77, MN77, NH77, NY77]
78=[I-78, US78, CA78, FL78, FL78NFM, HI78, NY78]
79=[I-79, US79, KY79, MA79, MO79, NY79, SD79]
80=[I-80, I-80BLFer, I-80BLRen, I-80BLLar, US80, FL80, NY80, SC80, VA80]
81=[I-81, US81, US81BusFar, SC81]
82=[I-82, US82, US82BusAlb, CA82, CO82, IL82, LA82Hol, NC82, OH82, TX82]
83=[I-83, US83, US83BusGar, CO83, HI83, IA83, IL83]
84=[I-84, US84, US84BusDot, CA84, FL84, FL84Nap, IL84]
85=[I-85, I-85BLGre, US85, US85BusGre, FL85, MA85, MD85, MI85, NE85, NY85, NY85A]
86=[I-86, I-86SWa, I-86Bin, I-86FutSwa, I-86FutBin, I-86FutDep, I-86FutMon, AZ86, CA86, GA86, KY86, NC86TrkHil, NY86]
87=[I-87, US87, US87She, US87BusBuf, US87BusChe, NC87, SD87, TX87, TX87Gal]
88=[I-88, CA88, MA88, ME88, NV88]
89=[I-89, US89, CA89, SD89]
90=[I-90, I-90BLWor, I-90BLRap, I-90BLWal, I-90BLKad, I-90BLMit, I-90BLMos, I-90BLBuf, I-90BLMoo, US90, US90AltPen, US90AltHal, NM90, TXLp90]
91=[I-91, US91, CA91, CO91]
92=[US92, US92TrkOrl, CA92, DE92, HI92, IA92, IL92, NE92, NY92, PA92, UT92, A92]
93=[I-93, US93, US93AltWen, US93BusBou, CO93, HI93, SC93, A93Obe]
94=[I-94, I-94BLAnn, I-94BLPor, I-94BLFar, I-94BLMed, I-94BLBis, IL94, NC94]
95=[I-95, I-95Sec, I-95BLDar, I-95BLFay, US95, US95SprFer, US95AltYer, AZ95, MN95, UT95, NB95, A95]
96=[I-96, US96, KS96, NY96, A96]
97=[I-97, US97, LA97, MD97, NY97, PA97Lit, BC97, BC97Con, BC97Lia, BC97Low, BC97Yuk]
98=[US98, US98TrkMob, AK98, ME98, NY98, PA98]
99=[I-99, I-99FutLoc, I-99FutMan, CA99, GA99, HI99, MA99, OR99, OR99E, WA99, WA99Fed, A99]
100=[FL100, IA100, IL100, MD100, ME100, MN100, MO100, NY100, NY100A, NY100C, PA100, VA100, VT100, WA100, WI100, NB100, A100]
101=[US101, US101BusSal, CT101, NH101, NH101A, NM101, RI101, SC101, VT101, ON101]
102=[FL102, LA102, MA102, ME102, MI102, RI102]
103=[FL103, MA103, NH103, NH103A, NY103, RI103, VT103]
104=[GA104, NY104, RI104, WA104, WV104, NS104]
105=[I-105, FL105, OH105, VT105]
106=[NC106, NY106, VT106, NB106]
107=[NH107, NM107, NY107, VT107]
108=[VT108]
109=[MD109, ME109, MI109, NH109, WA109, WA109SprHoq]
110=[I-110, CA110, IL110, MA110, WY110]
111=[MA111, ME111, NC111, NH111, NH111ANas, TXLp111, WY111]
112=[CT112, MA112, NH112, VA112, VT112, QC112]
113=[US113, US113BusSno, MA113, ME113, NH113, NH113A, OH113]
114=[IN114, MA114, MA114ASee, NH114, PA114, TX114, NB114]
115=[IL115, ME115, MI115, WA115]
116=[MA116, NH116, PA116, RI116, VT116]
117=[US117, MA117, ME117, NM117]
118=[CT118, MA118, NH118, NM118, OH118, PA118]
119=[US119, MA119, NH119, VT119, WI119]
120=[NH120]
121=[CA121, CO121, FL121, GA121, ME121, TX121, VT121, NB121]
122=[CT122, MA122, MA122AWor, NC122, NM122]
123=[US123, MA123, NH123, VA123, WA123]
124=[NH124, NJ124, NM124, SC124]
125=[NC125, WI125, QC125]
126=[CT126, MA126, UT126]
127=[US127, IL127, ME127, NH127]
128=[CA128, MA128, NC128, NH128, UT128]
129=[I-129, US129, US129BypMad, MA129, MA129ALyn, MO129]
130=[US130, CT130, HI130, NC130, TX130, UT130]
131=[US131, CT131, MA131, ME131, VT131]
132=[NC132, NH132, VT132]
133=[GA133, NC133, QC133]
134=[CA134, PA134, QC134]
136=[US136, IA136, MA136, NY136, RI136]
137=[ON137]
138=[US138, NJ138, OR138, RI138, RI138A, QC138Mon]
140=[I-140, CT140, MA140, MD140, NY140]
141=[US141, DE141, MA141, MO141]
142=[NY142]
143=[IL143, MA143, NC143, NC143BusRob, NY143, UT143]
144=[KY144, NV144, NY144, VA144]
145=[MA145, MS145, NY145, PA145, UT145]
146=[MA146, MA146AUxb, NY146, NY146A, OH146, RI146, RI146A, TX146]
147=[MA147, NC147, NY147, PA147, VA147]
148=[TN148, UT148, QC148]
149=[AL149, NH149, NY149]
150=[US150TrkLou, US150, IL150, MD150, NM150, NY150, VA150]
151=[US151, US151BusCed, NY151]
152=[CA152]
154=[UT154]
155=[GA155, MD155, NY155]
156=[CA156, CT156, NY156]
157=[NM157, NY157, NY157A]
158=[US158, AL158, NY158, TN158, UT158]
159=[CO159, CT159, MA159, NY159]
160=[US160, HI160, NY160]
161=[NY161]
162=[NY162, UT162]
163=[US163, IA163, MO163, NM163, NY163, OH163]
164=[IL164, WA164]
165=[I-165, NM165, NY165]
166=[NM166, NY166]
167=[US167, CA167, NY167, UT167, WA167, WI167]
168=[NC168, NV168, NY168, VA168]
169=[US169, CT169, MA169, NM169, NV169, NY169]
170=[I-170, NY170, NY170A, SC170, NB170]
171=[IL171, NY171, PA171, B171]
172=[NV172, UT172]
173=[NV173, UT173, B173, B173AST]
174=[NY174, B174]
175=[I-175, US175, CA175, MD175, NH175, NH175A, VA175, QC175, B175]
176=[US176]
177=[NM177, VA177, B177]
178=[US178, MS178]
180=[I-180, US180Car, US180ElP, US180]
181=[US181, MA181, NM181, PA181, B181]
182=[NJ182, NY182, B182]
183=[US183BypHay, US183, CT183, MA183, NJ183, SC183, TX183, B183]
185=[I-185, CA185, CT185, IL185, NM185, NY185]
186=[NY186, UT186]
187=[CT187, MA187]
188=[TX188]
189=[I-189, US189, CT189, FL189FWB, MA189]
190=[I-190, US190, CT190, UT190]
191=[US191, US191WYe, NC191, PA191]
192=[US192]
193=[CA193, MD193, VA193]
194=[MN194, NC194]
195=[I-195, CT195]
196=[I-196, I-196BLHol, ME196, NY196]
197=[NY197]
198=[ME198, NY198]
199=[US199, NY199]
200=[FL200, FL200Fer, MN200]
201=[I-H201, US201, CT201, NY201, UT201]
202=[US202, FL202, TXSpr202]
203=[MA203, NY203, OR203]
204=[GA204]
205=[I-205, NY205]
206=[US206]
207=[FL207, ME207, VA207]
208=[ME208, NJ208]
209=[US209, UT209]
210=[I-210, AL210, MN210, SC210, UT210]
211=[US211, NC211]
212=[US212, US212Coo, NY212]
213=[MA213, MD213, NY213, OR213]
214=[MD214]
215=[I-215]
217=[NY217]
218=[US218, CT218, NY218]
219=[US219, ME219]
220=[US220, US220AltMil, US220AltRoa, US220AltCan, MN220]
221=[US221, US221TrkPer]
222=[US222, FL222, MD222, MD222TrkPor, PA222]
223=[US223]
224=[US224, IA224, UT224]
225=[I-225, PA225]
226=[UT226]
228=[FL228]
229=[I-229, CT229]
231=[US231, FL231Lak, MD231]
233=[ME233, NY233]
234=[GA234, MD234, OR234, VA234]
235=[I-235, FL235, OH235]
236=[GA236, MD236, ME236, NY236]
237=[OH237]
238=[FL238, RI238]
240=[I-240, SD240]
242=[NC242, VT242]
243=[VA243, VT243, QC243]
244=[SD244]
245=[NY245, VA245]
246=[GA246]
247=[NY247, PA247]
249=[IN249]
250=[US250, IL250]
252=[NY252, OH252, PA252]
253=[NY253, VA253]
254=[CT254, NY254, OH254]
255=[I-255, KY255Mam]
258=[US258]
259=[US259, KY259, MD259, NY259]
261=[UT261]
263=[NY263]
264=[I-264, US264, US264AltWil]
265=[I-265]
267=[CA267, VA267]
269=[OH269, UT269]
270=[I-270, I-270SprAsh, US270, US270BusHot, UT270]
271=[I-271, US271]
272=[CT272]
273=[DE273]
274=[UT274]
275=[I-275, US275]
276=[I-276, US276]
277=[I-277, US277, US277BusWic, SC277]
278=[I-278, US278, NY278]
279=[I-279, MD279, VT279]
280=[I-280, US280, GA280, NC280]
281=[US281BypJam, US281, MD281, NC281]
283=[I-283, US283, OH283]
285=[I-285, US285, FL285]
286=[MA286, NH286, TX286, VA286]
287=[I-287, US287, US287BusWic, US287BusFtW, MD287]
288=[VA288]
289=[TXLp289, VA289]
290=[I-290, US290, NY290, PA290]
291=[I-291, MO291, PA291, SC291]
293=[I-293]
294=[I-294]
295=[I-295, DC295, MA295, MD295, NY295]
298=[NY298]
299=[DE299, NY299]
300=[GA300, NY300]
301=[US301, US301BypSta, OH301]
302=[US302, MS302]
306=[OH306]
307=[GA307, PA307]
309=[NY309, PA309, PA309BusWil]
310=[I-310, US310]
311=[US311, VA311]
312=[FL312]
313=[MD313, NM313, NY313, UT313, VT313]
314=[NM314]
315=[NY315, PA315, SC315]
318=[NV318]
319=[US319, CT319]
320=[CT320, NM320]
321=[US321, NV321]
322=[US322, US322BusSta, CT322]
324=[NY324]
325=[PA325]
326=[FL326]
331=[FL331, IN331, NY331, VA331]
332=[NY332]
333=[IA333, NM333]
334=[NY334]
335=[I-335, NY335]
336=[SC336]
337=[NM337, NY337]
338=[TN338]
340=[US340, US340Lou, HI340, MO340]
343=[NY343]
344=[NY344, NY344Cop]
345=[I-345]
346=[NY346, VT346]
347=[CO347, PA347]
349=[CT349, NY349]
351=[NY351]
355=[I-355, NY355]
358=[TX358]
359=[NV359, TX359]
360=[US360, HI360, TX360, QC360]
361=[TX361Ara]
364=[NY364]
365=[NY365]
366=[MO366, NY366]
369=[NY369]
370=[I-370, MO370, NE370, NY370, PA370]
371=[MN371, MN371BusBra]
372=[NY372]
375=[I-375, NV375, TXLp375]
376=[I-376, MD376]
377=[US377, HI377, NM377, NY377, SD377]
378=[US378, HI378, NY378]
380=[I-380, US380]
381=[I-381]
384=[I-384, NY384]
385=[I-385, I-385BSGre, US385]
387=[AZ387]
390=[I-390, NY390, TXLp390]
391=[I-391, CO391]
393=[I-393]
394=[I-394, NY394, PA394]
395=[I-395, US395, US395Sus, US395BusRen, US395AltWas, US395BusCar, NY395]
396=[NY396]
397=[NY397]
400=[US400, NM400]
401=[US401, WA401, ON401]
402=[ON402]
403=[ON403]
404=[DE404]
405=[I-405, FL405, PA405, ON405]
406=[NY406]
408=[FL408, MD408]
410=[I-410, WA410]
411=[US411]
412=[US412, NM412, NY412]
413=[PA413]
414=[FL414, NY414]
415=[PA415, PA415EHa]
416=[ON416]
417=[FL417, ON417]
418=[NM418]
420=[OH420, ON420, A420]
421=[US421, US421TrkWlm, NY421]
422=[US422Rea, US422]
423=[NM423]
424=[MD424]
425=[US425]
427=[NM427]
429=[FL429]
430=[I-430]
431=[US431, NV431]
434=[FL434, NY434]
435=[I-435]
437=[NY437]
440=[I-440, NJ440, NJ440Jer, NY440, A-440, A-440WQu, A-440EQu]
441=[US441, US441BusChe, US441BypMad, US441TrkLak, IN441]
443=[NY443]
444=[OH444]
448=[NM448]
450=[MD450]
459=[I-459]
460=[US460AltNor, US460, US460BusPet, US460BusBla, US460BusLyn, US460BusChr, US460Taz]
462=[SC462]
465=[I-465]
469=[I-469]
470=[I-470, CO470, NY470]
471=[I-471, FL471]
475=[I-475]
476=[I-476]
478=[NM478]
480=[I-480, I-480War]
481=[I-481, NY481]
485=[I-485]
488=[MD488]
490=[I-490]
491=[US491]
494=[I-494]
495=[I-495, NJ495, NY495]
496=[I-496]
501=[US501, US501BusLyn, US501TrkSou]
504=[WA504]
505=[I-505]
509=[WA509]
512=[WA512]
515=[I-515, GA515, WA515]
516=[I-516, WA516]
518=[NM518, WA518]
519=[WA519]
520=[I-520, GA520, WA520]
521=[US521]
522=[US522, NM522]
526=[I-526]
527=[SC527]
528=[FL528, NM528]
533=[E533]
535=[I-535, FL535]
536=[FL536, NM536]
537=[NM537]
539=[WA539]
540=[I-540]
542=[WA542]
546=[WA546]
547=[WA547]
549=[NM549]
550=[US550]
556=[NM556]
564=[NM564, NV564]
565=[I-565]
568=[NM568]
570=[FL570]
574=[FL574]
575=[I-575]
579=[FL579]
580=[I-580, FL580]
581=[I-581, PA581]
582=[FL582]
585=[WY585]
587=[I-587]
589=[FL589]
590=[I-590, NY590, OH590]
595=[I-595]
597=[NM597]
599=[NM599, WA599]
601=[US601]
606=[NM606]
610=[I-610]
611=[MD611, PA611]
630=[I-630]
631=[NY631]
635=[I-635, NY635]
636=[FL636]
640=[I-640]
659=[NV659]
670=[I-670]
675=[I-675, MD675Del]
676=[I-676]
678=[I-678]
680=[I-680]
681=[FL681]
684=[I-684, I-684Pur, FL684]
690=[I-690]
691=[I-691]
694=[I-694]
695=[I-695]
696=[I-696]
702=[MD702]
705=[I-705]
706=[WA706]
710=[I-710]
714=[FL714]
715=[PA715]
720=[A-720]
740=[A-740]
751=[NC751TrkDur]
759=[I-759]
763=[MO763]
776=[FL776]
780=[FL780]
781=[I-781, MD781]
785=[I-785FutRei, I-785FutDan]
787=[I-787, NY787]
789=[FL789, WY789]
790=[I-790]
794=[I-794, MD794, WI794]
795=[I-795, I-795FutJac]
802=[FM802]
817=[FL817]
820=[I-820]
825=[NY825]
826=[FL826]
836=[FL836]
838=[FL838]
840=[I-840, I-840FutEGr, NY840]
856=[FL856]
874=[FL874]
878=[FL878]
880=[I-880]
890=[I-890, NY890]
894=[I-894]
895=[I-895, I-895SprFer, I-895SprFur, VA895]
896=[DE896]
901=[NC901]
907=[FL907]
915=[PA915]
922=[KY922]
930=[IN930]
933=[FL933]
934=[FL934, PA934]
941=[KY941]
944=[PA944]
948=[FL948]
951=[FL951, FL951Nap]
953=[FL953]
968=[FL968]
969=[FM969]
973=[A-973]
976=[FL976]
980=[I-980]
985=[I-985, FL985]
990=[I-990]
997=[FL997, PA997]
1238=[KY1238]
1604=[TXLp1604]
1934=[KY1934]
2098=[FM2098]
3132=[LA3132]
3199=[KY3199]
3213=[A3213]
3214=[A3214]
3400=[HI3400]
9336=[FL9336]
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 23, 2019, 11:43:45 PM
Taking all TM user list files together, there are only 4 route numbers under 1000 that no one has claimed in any list file:

649 767 798 937
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on January 24, 2019, 04:34:11 AM
I've actually been on a couple roads with one of the route numbers no one has claimed yet in the Travel Mapping site, both in France: D937 from Pau to the 64/65 departmental border (also New Aquitaine ((old) Aquitaine)/Occitania (Midi-Pyrenees) regional border), and D937 from there to Lourdes. Even though it's physically one road I consider two separate designations due to them being at departmental level and the departmental border: one is in no. 64 Pyrenees-Atlantiques (i.e. Atlantic Pyrenees), and the other in no. 65 Hautes-Pyrenees (i.e. upper Pyrenees).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on January 24, 2019, 07:26:03 AM
Quote from: Jim on January 23, 2019, 11:43:45 PM
Taking all TM user list files together, there are only 4 route numbers under 1000 that no one has claimed in any list file:

649 767 798 937

I've driven several miles of FM 649 and all of FL/CR 798.

Will you count walking up to a Cullman County 937 shield? :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jeffandnicole on January 24, 2019, 08:17:19 AM
Most likely mine is probably as low at 8.  The only likely one I would've been on is in Dover, DE, and that would've been about 21 years ago.

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on January 24, 2019, 09:54:46 AM
For interstates, it's I-2. Prior to that route's creation, it would have been I-5.

For US routes, it's US 8.

For state routes, I'd have to check maps and tons of photos, but probably somewhere in the 11x range.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bzakharin on January 24, 2019, 11:24:46 AM
For me it would be 2, though I've been on US 202, a "child" route of US 2. If that excludes it, then 3.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadgeekteen on January 24, 2019, 12:37:53 PM
By state:

MA: 10
RI: 2
CT: 3 or 4
NH: 4
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: doorknob60 on January 24, 2019, 06:36:48 PM
1: CA, TCH
2: US, AB
3: OR, AB, BC
4: CA, WA, AB
5: I, AB
6: OR, WA
7: OR
8: I, ID, OR, WA
9: WA (No memory of this, but I have traveled to Snohomish a few times as a kid, so I very likely have been on it)
10: I, OR
11: OR
12: US, CA (overlap with I-80)
13: CA (not positive, but pretty sure it happened when I visited family in Berkeley when I was younger)
14: WA
15: I
16: ID, WA
17: CA, WA
18: CA, OR, WA
19: ID, OR
20: US, WA
21: ID
22: CA, ID, OR, WY
23: Gifford Pinchot NF 23 (https://www.fs.usda.gov/recarea/giffordpinchot/recarea/?recid=72029) (it is a numbered route, must count)
24: CA, ID (clipped the end of it I guess?, been on all ramps of I-84 Exit 211), WA
25: ID (overlap with I-84)
26: US
27: ID, OR
28: CA, NV, maybe WA
29: Guess this is where I lose

A lot better than I expected, to be honest (and I forgot about WA-9 for a bit so almost ended it there). A couple ones with minimal to no memory though, except I remember being in the place that it goes to, so I assume to have been on the road, so a bit shaky I guess.

My conclusion is that Prime-numbered highways are harder to find than most other numbers.


Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: PHLBOS on January 25, 2019, 09:27:00 AM
By state:
MA: SR 8
NH: US 2
ME: SR 4
VT: SR 3
RI: SR 2
CT: SR 4
NY: US 2
NJ: SR 3
PA: SR 5
DE: SR 5
MD: SR 4
VA: SR 2
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kurumi on January 25, 2019, 11:17:04 AM
18, and I thought it would be higher. But crossing US 18 (for example) on IA 60 and getting a sign photo was enough that I didn't feel the need to exit IA 60.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 1995hoo on January 25, 2019, 09:15:27 PM
Not positive about this, but I think for me it's 69. I didn't sort through all my Travel Mapping entries, but looking at a list of highways numbered "69" I can't find any I've travelled unless there's a concurrency I'm overlooking.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadgeekteen on January 25, 2019, 09:51:44 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on January 25, 2019, 09:15:27 PM
Not positive about this, but I think for me it's 69. I didn't sort through all my Travel Mapping entries, but looking at a list of highways numbered "69" I can't find any I've travelled unless there's a concurrency I'm overlooking.
Nice
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Takumi on January 25, 2019, 10:00:31 PM
9
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Takumi on January 25, 2019, 10:01:10 PM
Quote from: Roadgeekteen on January 25, 2019, 09:51:44 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on January 25, 2019, 09:15:27 PM
Not positive about this, but I think for me it's 69. I didn't sort through all my Travel Mapping entries, but looking at a list of highways numbered "69" I can't find any I've travelled unless there's a concurrency I'm overlooking.
Nice
Nice
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 25, 2019, 10:57:15 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on January 25, 2019, 09:15:27 PM
Not positive about this, but I think for me it's 69. I didn't sort through all my Travel Mapping entries, but looking at a list of highways numbered "69" I can't find any I've travelled unless there's a concurrency I'm overlooking.

Your TM list has 3 for you:

69=[ON69, AZ69, VA69]

It reports 96 as your lowest untraveled.

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 1995hoo on January 26, 2019, 10:23:01 AM
Quote from: Jim on January 25, 2019, 10:57:15 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on January 25, 2019, 09:15:27 PM
Not positive about this, but I think for me it's 69. I didn't sort through all my Travel Mapping entries, but looking at a list of highways numbered "69" I can't find any I've travelled unless there's a concurrency I'm overlooking.

Your TM list has 3 for you:

69=[ON69, AZ69, VA69]

It reports 96 as your lowest untraveled.



Thanks. When I was going through this in my mind the other day, there was at least one in the 70s I couldn't think of either. Now I'll have to look at my Travel Mapping to see what segments I travelled of the routes you note.

Edited to add: Damn, ON-69 and AZ-69 are clinches, too! I can certainly see why I overlooked VA-69 given that I drove 0.27 of a mile on it. Looking at the map, I can remember when and why that was–I was headed to Charlotte for a bowl game and I-77 was at a standstill, so I bailed there. This was the same trip when I left my car stopped in a lane of traffic to go take a leak next to the road (as noted in the thread here about the highest class of road next to which you have urinated).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on January 26, 2019, 11:05:48 AM
Quote from: Takumi on January 25, 2019, 10:00:31 PM
9

Revolutionary. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 1995hoo on January 26, 2019, 12:07:10 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 26, 2019, 11:05:48 AM
Quote from: Takumi on January 25, 2019, 10:00:31 PM
9

Revolutionary. 

You become naked before driving there, so Takumi need not inform us when he hits number nine.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SGwithADD on January 26, 2019, 12:13:32 PM
Looks like I am at 102, based off of my memory.  Here's at least one route I've driven on for each number:

US 1, WV 2, NJ 3, RI 4, NY 5, US 6, NY 7, NY 8, US 9, NY 10, US 11, NY 12, NY 13, NY 14, NY 15, NY 16, NY 17, PA 18, US 19, US 20, NJ 21, US 22, PA 23, NJ 24, NY 25, NY 26, NY 27, PA 28, PA 29, NY 30, NJ 31, NY 32, NY 33, NY 34, I-35, PA 36, I-37, NY 38, NY 39, US 40, NY 41, NY 42, PA 43, US 44, I-45, US 46, MD 47, PA 48, PA 49, US 50, PA 51, NY 52, PA 53, NY 54, NY 55, PA 56, I-57, MD 58, US 59, PA 60, PA 61, US 62, NY 63, I-64, PA 65, PA 66, NY 67, I-68, I-69, I-70, TX 71, I-72, PA 73, I-74, I-75, I-76, I-77, I-78, I-79, I-80, I-81, NJ 82, I-83, I-84, NY 85, I-86, I-87, I-88, NY 89, I-90, NY 91, PA 92, I-93, I-94, I-95, I-96, I-97, NY 98, I-99, NY 100, US 101

There's a chance I have been on MA 102, but I don't remember it enough to count it.  Even then, I'd only advance to 103...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadgeekteen on January 26, 2019, 12:28:18 PM
Quote from: Jim on January 25, 2019, 10:57:15 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on January 25, 2019, 09:15:27 PM
Not positive about this, but I think for me it's 69. I didn't sort through all my Travel Mapping entries, but looking at a list of highways numbered "69" I can't find any I've travelled unless there's a concurrency I'm overlooking.

Your TM list has 3 for you:

69=[ON69, AZ69, VA69]

It reports 96 as your lowest untraveled.
not nice
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on January 26, 2019, 01:07:55 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on January 26, 2019, 12:07:10 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 26, 2019, 11:05:48 AM

Quote from: Takumi on January 25, 2019, 10:00:31 PM
9


Revolutionary. 

You become naked before driving there, so Takumi need not inform us when he hits number nine.

No problem with that.

Quote from: flaroads on June 25, 2009, 10:18:03 PM
It was revealed that it is not illegal for a driver in Florida to drive in the nude.




Quote from: Roadgeekteen on January 26, 2019, 12:28:18 PM

Quote from: Jim on January 25, 2019, 10:57:15 PM
96

not nice

It's the position of going back to sleep afterwards.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bassoon1986 on January 26, 2019, 04:27:07 PM
101

I've crossed over LA 101 and unsigned WV 101 but no drive time on either.


iPhone
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Thing 342 on January 26, 2019, 10:16:34 PM
My lowest is 103; the closest of which is VA-103 near Stuart.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ipeters61 on January 27, 2019, 03:33:20 PM
"Because everyone else is doing it," these are examples of roads with numbers below 28 that I've been on (only roads I've been the driver or pedestrian on), making 28 the lowest numbered route I've never been on.

US-1/DE-1
CT-2/DE-2/MD-2
CT-3/DE-3/MD-3/PA-3
CT-4/DE-4
US-5/DE-5
US-6/DE-6
US-7/DE-7/MD-7
CT-8/DE-8/MD-8
US-9/CT-9/DE-9/"PA-9" (I-476)
CT-10/DE-10
US-11/CT-11
CT-12/DE-12
US-13
CT-14/DE-14
US-15/CT-15/DE-15
CT-16
CT-17/NJ-17/NY-17
DE-18/NJ-18
MD-19
US-20/CT-20/DE-20/MD-20
MD-21
US-22/NY-22
PA-23
DE-24
CT-25
DE-26
NJ-27
...no Route 28...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: plain on January 27, 2019, 05:30:32 PM
I don't recall driving a 159 anywhere, so that's my answer.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: skluth on January 27, 2019, 06:30:37 PM
102
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 28, 2019, 12:50:12 PM
Looks like 103 to me.  Can't confirm if I drove on the concurrency with VT 100 or not.

Got 102 in Maine :D.  NY 103 is quite nearby;  I'll snag it tonight!

Examples:

US 1
MA 2
MA 3
US 4
US 5
US 6
US 7
MA 8
MA 9
MA 10
US 11
US 12
US 13
US 14
US 15
US 16
US 17
NY 18
US 19
US 20
MA 21
US 22
US 23
I-24
I-25
I-26
US 27
MA 28
US 29
US 30
US 31
MA 32
MA 33
NY 34
I-35
US 36
IN 37
IA 38
I-39
I-40
US 41
NJ 42
I-43
I-44
US 45
IN 46
MA 47
US 48
NY 49
US 50
US 51
US 52
US 53
US 54
I-55
PA 56
I-57
US 58
I-59
US 60
MN 61
US 62
NY 63
I-64
I-65
MA 66
US 67
I-68
I-69
I-70
I-71
CT 72
I-73
I-74
I-75
I-76
I-77
I-78
I-79
I-80
I-81
I-82
I-83
I-84
I-85
I-86
I-87
I-88
I-89
I-90
I-91
UT 92
I-93
I-94
I-95
I-96
I-97
US 98
I-99
VT 100
US 101
ME 102
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: apeman33 on January 28, 2019, 01:27:18 PM
There's no K-12 and I can't recall being on a Route 12 in any other state.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on January 28, 2019, 02:18:43 PM
Strangely enough, I've made a Flickr album just for answering this exact question!  The lowest number I don't have represented in my sign photo collection is 112.  The only state around me with a 112 is Wisconsin, and it's way up by Lake Superior.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: csw on February 21, 2019, 01:58:03 PM
Looks like my highest number is 82.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ClassicHasClass on February 21, 2019, 02:44:47 PM
11.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Max Rockatansky on February 21, 2019, 04:42:18 PM
For California it is CA 19 as it is a very small highway that is almost entirely relinquished near Lakewood.  In Arizona AZ 24 was built after all I moved and I have yet to drive it.  Overall I have no idea but going through it in my head I got to the 200s without finding a gap in the numbers.  I'd speculate somewhere in the 300-400 range.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 21, 2019, 10:15:25 PM
106 (There is no Ohio 106 (anymore), so the nearest one to me would be in Michigan)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on February 22, 2019, 08:26:36 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 21, 2019, 10:15:25 PM
106 (There is no Ohio 106 (anymore), so the nearest one to me would be in Michigan)

Depending on where the one in Michigan is, the one in Indiana might be closer.   
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on February 22, 2019, 01:41:03 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on February 21, 2019, 04:42:18 PM
For California it is CA 19 as it is a very small highway that is almost entirely relinquished near Lakewood.  In Arizona AZ 24 was built after all I moved and I have yet to drive it.  Overall I have no idea but going through it in my head I got to the 200s without finding a gap in the numbers.  I'd speculate somewhere in the 300-400 range.

Overall, wouldn't your answer be 19? not a number somewhere in the 300-400 range.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jeffandnicole on February 22, 2019, 01:43:23 PM
Quote from: kphoger on February 22, 2019, 01:41:03 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on February 21, 2019, 04:42:18 PM
For California it is CA 19 as it is a very small highway that is almost entirely relinquished near Lakewood.  In Arizona AZ 24 was built after all I moved and I have yet to drive it.  Overall I have no idea but going through it in my head I got to the 200s without finding a gap in the numbers.  I’d speculate somewhere in the 300-400 range.

Overall, wouldn't your answer be 19? not a number somewhere in the 300-400 range.

I think he's just being state specific for 19 and 24, but has driven a Route 19 and 24 in other states.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on February 22, 2019, 02:20:32 PM
Quote from: jeffandnicole on February 22, 2019, 01:43:23 PM
Quote from: kphoger on February 22, 2019, 01:41:03 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on February 21, 2019, 04:42:18 PM
For California it is CA 19 as it is a very small highway that is almost entirely relinquished near Lakewood.  In Arizona AZ 24 was built after all I moved and I have yet to drive it.  Overall I have no idea but going through it in my head I got to the 200s without finding a gap in the numbers.  I’d speculate somewhere in the 300-400 range.

Overall, wouldn't your answer be 19? not a number somewhere in the 300-400 range.

I think he's just being state specific for 19 and 24, but has driven a Route 19 and 24 in other states.

Of course.  My thinking was backwards.  Thank you.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Flint1979 on February 22, 2019, 05:43:44 PM
Let's see.
1: US and M-1
2: US-2
3: M-3
4: I-4
5: M-5
6: US and M-6
7: US-7
8: US and M-8
9: US 9
10: US, I and M-10
11: M-11
12: US and I-12
13: M-13
14: US and M-14
15: M-15
16: I-16
17: M-17
18: M-18
19: M-19
20: US and M-20
21: M-21
22: M-22
23: US-23
24: US, I and M-24
25: US and M-25
26: I-26
27: US and M-27
28: M-28
29: M-29
30: M-30
31: US 31
32: M-32
33: M-33
34: US-34
35: US and I-35
36: US and M-36
37: M-37
38: IL-38
39: M and I-39
40: M, US and I-40
41: US-41
42: US-42
43: M and I-43
44: M-44
45: M-45
46: M-46
47: M-47
48: M-48
49: OH-49
50: M and US-50
51: M and US-51
52: M and US-52
53: M-53
54: M-54
55: M-55
56: IL-56
57: M-57
58: M-58
59: M, US and I-59
60: M and US 60
61: M-61
62: M and US-62
63: M-63
64: I-64
65: I and M-65
66: M-66
67: US-67
68: M-68
69: US, M and I-69
70: I-70
71: I-71
72: M-72
73: OH-73
74: I-74
75: US, I and M-75
76: I-76
77: I-77
78: I-78
79: I-79
80: I-80
81: M-81
82: M-82
83: M-83
84: M-84
85: M and I-85
86: M-86
87: I-87
88: I and M-88
89: M-89
90: M and I-90
91: I and M-91
92: IL-92
93: I-93
94: I-94
95: I-95
96: I-96
97: I think 97 is my number and I kind of hope it is.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Flint1979 on February 22, 2019, 05:49:48 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on February 22, 2019, 08:26:36 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 21, 2019, 10:15:25 PM
106 (There is no Ohio 106 (anymore), so the nearest one to me would be in Michigan)

Depending on where the one in Michigan is, the one in Indiana might be closer.
M-106 is between Jackson and a really small town called Gregory (southwest corner of Livingston County).

Indiana's 106 looks like it serves as a business route for US-6 through Breman about 20 or so miles south of South Bend.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Flint1979 on February 22, 2019, 05:50:50 PM
What's strange with Michigan is that we removed M-120 causing a gap in between Indiana's 120 and Ohio's 120 and put M-120 in another part of the state.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on February 22, 2019, 05:59:09 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on February 22, 2019, 05:43:44 PM
38 for me. I've never been on M-38, there isn't an I-38 even though there is an I-238 lol, and the original US-38 got ate up by US-6.

You haven't been on IL-38 in the Chicago area?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 22, 2019, 06:21:25 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on February 22, 2019, 05:49:48 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on February 22, 2019, 08:26:36 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 21, 2019, 10:15:25 PM
106 (There is no Ohio 106 (anymore), so the nearest one to me would be in Michigan)

Depending on where the one in Michigan is, the one in Indiana might be closer.
M-106 is between Jackson and a really small town called Gregory (southwest corner of Livingston County).

Indiana's 106 looks like it serves as a business route for US-6 through Breman about 20 or so miles south of South Bend.

I went and measured the distance for the two '106s' from 'Central Ohio' before I posted last night. Michigan's 106 was 20 miles closer than Indiana's 106 for me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Flint1979 on February 22, 2019, 10:58:10 PM
Quote from: kphoger on February 22, 2019, 05:59:09 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on February 22, 2019, 05:43:44 PM
38 for me. I've never been on M-38, there isn't an I-38 even though there is an I-238 lol, and the original US-38 got ate up by US-6.

You haven't been on IL-38 in the Chicago area?
Geez I guess I have. I wasn't thinking of other states I might have to continue my post now lol. I had to look to see what street IL-38 used and I've been on the Roosevelt Road part of it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Flint1979 on February 22, 2019, 10:59:59 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 22, 2019, 06:21:25 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on February 22, 2019, 05:49:48 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on February 22, 2019, 08:26:36 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 21, 2019, 10:15:25 PM
106 (There is no Ohio 106 (anymore), so the nearest one to me would be in Michigan)

Depending on where the one in Michigan is, the one in Indiana might be closer.
M-106 is between Jackson and a really small town called Gregory (southwest corner of Livingston County).

Indiana's 106 looks like it serves as a business route for US-6 through Breman about 20 or so miles south of South Bend.

I went and measured the distance for the two '106s' from 'Central Ohio' before I posted last night. Michigan's 106 was 20 miles closer than Indiana's 106 for me.
Kind of makes sense that it is. Jackson is closer to just about anywhere in Ohio than South Bend.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hobsini2 on February 24, 2019, 06:12:32 PM
Off the top of my head and a few I had to check, it looks like my number is 97 as of February 2019.
Now, as of July 2023, the number is now 105.

1: IL, US, IN
2: OH
3: IN, MI
4: Interstate, IL
5: IL
6: US, IL
7: IL
8: IL
9: US
10: Interstate, US
11: WI
12: US
13: WI
14: US
15: Interstate, WI (last 2 incarnations)
16: WI
17: Interstate, IL
18: US
19: IL, WI
20: Interstate, US, WI
21: IL, WI
22: IL, WI
23: WI
24: Interstate, WI
25: Interstate, IL
26: IL, WI
27: Interstate
28: WI
29: Interstate, IL, WI
30: Interstate, US, WI
31: IL, WI
32: IL, WI
33: IL, WI
34: US
35: Interstate
36: US
37: FL, IN
38: IL
39: Interstate, WI
40: Interstate, US, IL
41: Interstate, US
42: WI
43: Interstate
44: WI
45: Interstate, US
46: SD (I had to look this number up to make sure.)
47: IL
48: Former US in WV
49: WI
50: US, IL
51: US
52: US
53: IL
54: US
55: Interstate
56: IL
57: Interstate
58: IL
59, IL, WI
60: IL, WI
61: US
62: IL
63: US
64: IL
65: Interstate
66: Former US, MI
67: US
68: Interstate, IL
69: Interstate, US
70: Interstate, US
71: Interstate, IL
72: Interstate, IL
73: Interstate, WI
74: Interstate, US
75: Interstate, US, IL
76: Interstate, WI
77: Interstate, US
78: Interstate, WI
79: Interstate, US
80: Interstate
81: Interstate, WI
82: WI
83: IL, WI
84: Interstate, Former WI
85: Interstate, US
86: TX (I had to look this number up.)
87: Interstate, WI
88: Interstate
89: IL, WI
90: Interstate
91: WI
92: WI
93: Interstate
94: Interstate
95: Interstate
96: Interstate
97: IL
98: KS
99:WI
100: WI
101: AL
102: IL
103: WI (Former)
104: WI
105:

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Tarkus on February 24, 2019, 08:20:03 PM
For me, counting both ones I've driven and ones where I've been a passenger, it'd be 7.  There's plenty of Highway 7s around me--Oregon has one, as do Washington, Idaho, and California (and Nevada used to have one pre-US 93), but the closest I've come is passing by WA-7.  I have a few other low numbers (9, 13, 15-17) that are also on the list. I'm actually shockingly well-traveled on highways up in the 200s, in large part due to Oregon's numbering scheme, but that extends elsewhere as well.

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Zeffy on February 27, 2019, 08:30:06 AM
I've never been on any route 2 before, so that would be mine.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hockeyjohn on February 27, 2019, 10:34:30 AM
154.    There is an Indiana 154 where I've passed through the intersection near Sullivan several times but never turned on; and a M-154 on Harsens Island and passed the "TO" sign along M-29 but didn't take the ferry over.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadsguy on February 27, 2019, 10:40:49 AM
Mine's just 4. I've been on US 1, PA 3, and I'm pretty sure a short piece of DE 2, but not any of the Route 4s in any state I've been to. The same goes for 5.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on March 15, 2019, 10:28:24 AM
Update:

QuoteThe lowest number I haven't been on or crossed is 24, which is surprising since MA 24 is a freeway.

I've now been on MA 24. Now, the lowest number I haven't been on or crossed is 36, thanks to US 29 in Atlanta and NY 34 in Ithaca, NY. (My "haven't been on" answer of 14 remains unchanged.)

36 will be a bit of a hard one to get, as MA 36 is short and out of the way for most places, and there is no other 36 in New England. Interestingly, MA 36 ends at MA 14, so maybe I could update both lists at the same time if there's any reason to go that way (maybe a cranberry bog tour).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on March 15, 2019, 12:32:08 PM
Quote from: 1 on March 15, 2019, 10:28:24 AM
Update:
QuoteThe lowest number I haven't been on or crossed is 24, which is surprising since MA 24 is a freeway.
I've now been on MA 24. Now, the lowest number I haven't been on or crossed is 36, thanks to US 29 in Atlanta and NY 34 in Ithaca, NY. (My "haven't been on" answer of 14 remains unchanged.)

NY 14 is pretty close to Ithaca; only a short hop down NY 79.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: thspfc on March 30, 2019, 01:58:59 PM
1: Never driven a 1, but I've driven past the northern terminus of IA-1 and the eastern of MN-1.
2: I've driven good chunks of US-2 in Michigan and Wisconsin.
3: Again, I've driven past the eastern terminus of IA-3 but never driven a 3.
4: The majority of I-4 in Florida.
5: Tiny part of MN-5 in downtown St. Paul.
6: Most of US-6 in Colorado, along with its Interstate concurrences in Nebraska and Iowa.
7: Nothing.
8: Parts of US-8 in Wisconsin.
9: Nothing.
10: Parts of US-10 in Wisconsin and Minnesota.
11: Part of WI-11.
12: Most of US-12 in Wisconsin.
13: Part of WI-13.
14: All of US-14 in WI save for the westernmost few miles.
15: Crossed WI-15 on I-41, but never driven a 15.
16: Lots of WI-16.
17: Parts of WI-17.
18: Quite a bit of US-18 in Wisconsin.
19: Clinched WI-19.
20: Part of US-20 in Illinois.
I could go on, but save for the first ten numbers, I have most of them up to 100.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 27, 2019, 09:45:52 PM
Quote from: Rothman on January 28, 2019, 12:50:12 PM
Looks like 103 to me.  Can't confirm if I drove on the concurrency with VT 100 or not.

Got 102 in Maine :D.  NY 103 is quite nearby;  I'll snag it tonight!

Examples:

US 1
MA 2
MA 3
US 4
US 5
US 6
US 7
MA 8
MA 9
MA 10
US 11
US 12
US 13
US 14
US 15
US 16
US 17
NY 18
US 19
US 20
MA 21
US 22
US 23
I-24
I-25
I-26
US 27
MA 28
US 29
US 30
US 31
MA 32
MA 33
NY 34
I-35
US 36
IN 37
IA 38
I-39
I-40
US 41
NJ 42
I-43
I-44
US 45
IN 46
MA 47
US 48
NY 49
US 50
US 51
US 52
US 53
US 54
I-55
PA 56
I-57
US 58
I-59
US 60
MN 61
US 62
NY 63
I-64
I-65
MA 66
US 67
I-68
I-69
I-70
I-71
CT 72 / NJ 72
I-73
I-74
I-75
I-76
I-77
I-78
I-79
I-80
I-81
I-82
I-83
I-84
I-85
I-86
I-87
I-88
I-89
I-90
I-91
UT 92
I-93
I-94
I-95
I-96
I-97
US 98
I-99
VT 100
US 101
ME 102


NY 103
NY 104
WI 105

Finally got to NY 103.  Now to find a route 106... (eh, probably not) :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on April 28, 2019, 12:12:36 AM
After importing my Travel Mapping file into Excel and whipping up a few formulas and sorting ...
I thought it would be higher (and mildly surprised that there are a few "holes" in my list) ...

Lowest number haven't been on (USA) - 35 nor 39    - but I have been on Iceland's 35 and 39
Lowest current number haven't been on (anywhere) - 46     - but I have driven MD 46 before it was decommissioned
Lowest number haven't been on (anywhere) - 47
Other low-ish numbers under 60 - 48, 53, 54

May have to look harder for any roads I may have missed - or plan a road trip to get these stragglers.

EDITED (4/28/2019 afternoon) - found some minor concurrencies I missed.
EDITED (4/28/2019 evening) - found more that I missed.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ben114 on April 28, 2019, 10:52:28 AM
Quote from: Rothman
Now to find a route 106... (eh, probably not) :D
If you find yourself in southeastern MA you can grab MA 106.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 28, 2019, 11:23:12 AM
Quote from: Ben114 on April 28, 2019, 10:52:28 AM
Quote from: Rothman
Now to find a route 106... (eh, probably not) :D
If you find yourself in southeastern MA you can grab MA 106.
Thanks.  Still, I have more than enough travel goals as is without adding "touch a route of every number" to the list -- especially with how long I'd probably have to spend in Kentucky or Virginia to do so. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Duke87 on April 28, 2019, 01:20:12 PM
There was a related discussion in chat a few weeks ago where I determined the lowest number I have not clinched any routes with is 202 (I still need to finish US 202...)

The lowest route number I have not traveled any segment of at all appears to be 245 (caveat: this does not include unsigned routes or county routes - I don't know if this would hold including those as I'm just not keeping track of such things).

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: capt.ron on April 28, 2019, 02:24:57 PM
Alabama: 2 (US 72); 20 (ALT 72), 4,5 (US 78)
In Arkansas: AR 1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 15, 16, 22, 27, 31, 33b, 36
California: 1, I-5, CA 7 (now as I-710), CA 11 (the old one which is now I-110), I-15, CA 18, 22, 39, I-40
Tennessee: TN 25
Florida: I-4
Oregon: OR 18
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on April 29, 2019, 12:30:45 AM
Quote from: Hurricane Rex on January 23, 2019, 12:15:56 PM
1 is the lowest I haven't been on as OR and WA 1 don't exist, and the other states I don't spend nearly enough time to pay attention. Unless you want to count going to the sun road as Glacier Route 1.

LG-TP260


You've been on ORH 1.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on April 29, 2019, 12:38:21 AM
Quote from: Tarkus on February 24, 2019, 08:20:03 PM
For me, counting both ones I've driven and ones where I've been a passenger, it'd be 7.  There's plenty of Highway 7s around me--Oregon has one, as do Washington, Idaho, and California (and Nevada used to have one pre-US 93), but the closest I've come is passing by WA-7.  I have a few other low numbers (9, 13, 15-17) that are also on the list. I'm actually shockingly well-traveled on highways up in the 200s, in large part due to Oregon's numbering scheme, but that extends elsewhere as well.


I'm pretty sure you've been on ORH 7 ;)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: DandyDan on April 29, 2019, 07:26:04 AM
Quote from: DandyDan on January 23, 2019, 04:41:49 PM
For me, it's 102, but by current designations, it's 49, as the only Highway 49 I've ever been on is MN 49, but that was when I was a kid and MN 49 has been gone for a while now.
I have been on a current 49. In fact, I was on 2 on the same road trip. I was on IL 49 in Casey, IL (probably only to get gas) and OH 49 in Greenville, OH on my 2002 trip to Ohio and Michigan.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Skye on May 01, 2019, 08:55:06 PM
Does I-H1 count?  If not, then I-5.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on May 02, 2019, 06:50:20 AM
Quote from: Skye on May 01, 2019, 08:55:06 PM
Does I-H1 count?  If not, then I-5.

Well, it can be any road or route numbered 1, 2, 3, and so forth and so on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: KEVIN_224 on May 02, 2019, 08:47:23 AM
I've been near I-4 in downtown Tampa. The lowest numbered interstate I have been on is a piece of I-24 in Nashville (when it was with I-40).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 02, 2019, 08:50:03 AM
Are people missing the point of this thread?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on May 02, 2019, 08:53:51 AM
Quote from: Rothman on May 02, 2019, 08:50:03 AM
Are people missing the point of this thread?

I would guess yes for KEVIN_224.

Skye has probably been on routes numbered 2, 3, and 4 without explicitly mentioning it, with 1 being arguable.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: KEVIN_224 on May 03, 2019, 08:19:09 AM
I apologize for the confusion. Since CT doesn't duplicate state route numbers with US and interstate numbers, the lowest for me in-state would be CT Route 11, which starts at CT Route 2 in Colchester.

US 1
CT 2
CT 3
CT 4
US 5
US 6
US 7
CT 8
CT 9
CT 10...

Yes...CT Route 11. I may have been on CT Route 12 in the New London area. I've definitely been on pieces of MA and NH Route 12, which I think are connected to ours as an old New England "interstate".
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Evan_Th on May 11, 2019, 04:42:26 PM
For me I'm pretty sure it's 14.

I've been on:
US 1 (primarily in North Carolina, and several other places up to New York State)
US 2 (in Washington State)
Oswego Highway No. 3 (Macadam Ave, Portland, OR)
Charlotte Route 4 (Billy Graham Pkwy, Charlotte, NC)
I-5 (all the way from Canada south to Salem, OR; and again from Los Angeles south to San Diego)
US 6 (Scranton, PA)
WA 7 (Pacific Ave, Tacoma)
NC 8 (north of Winston-Salem)
NC 9 (Black Mountain, NC)
I-10 (Los Angeles, CA)
US 11 (New York State)
NC 12 (Kitty Hawk)
NY 13 (in Ithaca)

I've crossed US 14, WV 14, and WA 14, but I've never been on any of them or any other Highway 14.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Finrod on May 17, 2019, 01:49:39 PM
It's likely 2 for me.  I was on US 1 briefly one time in New Hampshire; but US 2 is further north than I've been and I-2 is further south than I've been, and I don't recall a state road 2 that I've been on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: mapman1071 on May 17, 2019, 10:05:17 PM
Arizona 24
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SoCal Kid on May 17, 2019, 10:49:29 PM
Been on US 1 and California SR 1 (every Californian has to have been on it AT LEAST ONCE). Been on CA SR 2 (not Glendale Fwy section). So that would be 3, for me. Been on Interstate 4 and 5, and so on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheStranger on May 17, 2019, 10:56:47 PM
Quote from: SoCal Kid on May 17, 2019, 10:49:29 PM
Been on US 1 and California SR 1 (every Californian has to have been on it AT LEAST ONCE). Been on CA SR 2 (not Glendale Fwy section). So that would be 3, for me. Been on Interstate 4 and 5, and so on.

I've never been on Route 3 either in any form out here, so that was also my thought for lowest numbered state route I have yet to go to.

Lowest numbered US route I have never gone on is US 2.  Lowest numbered Interstate would be the aforementioned I-4.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: amroad17 on May 18, 2019, 04:09:11 AM
After much pondering and checking, 107 is the lowest number for me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: thspfc on May 18, 2019, 09:29:34 AM
Quoteauthor=Rothman link=topic=24342.msg2412613#msg2412613 date=1556415952]
Looks like 103 to me.  Can't confirm if I drove on the concurrency with VT 100 or not.
WI 105
I had no clue WI-105 existed, way up there in Douglas County.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 18, 2019, 10:17:04 AM
Quote from: thspfc on May 18, 2019, 09:29:34 AM
Quote from: Rothman on April 27, 2019, 09:45:52 PM
Quote from: Rothman on January 28, 2019, 12:50:12 PM
Looks like 103 to me.  Can't confirm if I drove on the concurrency with VT 100 or not.
WI 105
I had no clue WI-105 existed, way up there in Douglas County.
It leads to the semi-famous Oliver Bridge.

My in-laws actually lived on the other side of WI 35 where WI 105 ends (Central Ave).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: mgk920 on May 18, 2019, 10:35:41 AM
For me, I've not yet been on M0 (Budapest Ring Road) in Hungary.

:wow:

In North America, for me it would be '5'.  I came close to US 5 during a couple of late 1990s/early 2000s roadtrips, but was never on it.

I've been on:
- US/DE/IL 1
- US/MA/NY 2
- US/MA 3
- US 4
(5)
- US 6
- US 7
- US 8
- US 9
- US 10
- US/WI 11
(etc)

Mike
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Evan_Th on May 18, 2019, 12:53:00 PM
Quote from: TheStranger on May 17, 2019, 10:56:47 PMSo that would be 3, for me. Been on Interstate 4 and 5, and so on.

I've never been on Route 3 either in any form out here, so that was also my thought for lowest numbered state route I have yet to go to.
[/quote]It's weird how many of us have never been on any Route 3.  I thought so too, but then a Wikipedia search (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highways_numbered_3) turned up a County Highway 3 in Portland, OR, where I'd been on a few blocks.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SoCal Kid on May 19, 2019, 01:03:34 AM
Quote from: Evan_Th on May 18, 2019, 12:53:00 PM
Quote from: TheStranger on May 17, 2019, 10:56:47 PMSo that would be 3, for me. Been on Interstate 4 and 5, and so on.

I've never been on Route 3 either in any form out here, so that was also my thought for lowest numbered state route I have yet to go to.
It's weird how many of us have never been on any Route 3.  I thought so too, but then a Wikipedia search (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highways_numbered_3) turned up a County Highway 3 in Portland, OR, where I'd been on a few blocks.
[/quote]
Ive got close to Interstate H3 when I went to Hawaii for vacation. But i only passed it and only been on H1, H201, and H2
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on May 23, 2019, 01:22:15 PM
Quote from: Evan_Th on May 18, 2019, 12:53:00 PM
Quote from: TheStranger on May 17, 2019, 10:56:47 PMSo that would be 3, for me. Been on Interstate 4 and 5, and so on.

I've never been on Route 3 either in any form out here, so that was also my thought for lowest numbered state route I have yet to go to.
It's weird how many of us have never been on any Route 3.  I thought so too, but then a Wikipedia search (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highways_numbered_3) turned up a County Highway 3 in Portland, OR, where I'd been on a few blocks.
[/quote]
Er, what? There aren't any signed county routes in Multnomah County.
Are you talking about ORH 3, OR 43's Highway number?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheStranger on May 23, 2019, 01:45:06 PM
Quote from: TheStranger on May 17, 2019, 10:56:47 PM
Quote from: SoCal Kid on May 17, 2019, 10:49:29 PM
Been on US 1 and California SR 1 (every Californian has to have been on it AT LEAST ONCE). Been on CA SR 2 (not Glendale Fwy section). So that would be 3, for me. Been on Interstate 4 and 5, and so on.

I've never been on Route 3 either in any form out here, so that was also my thought for lowest numbered state route I have yet to go to.

Lowest numbered US route I have never gone on is US 2.  Lowest numbered Interstate would be the aforementioned I-4.

A followup:

If we were thinking of lowest numbered route I've never been on, period (since I have been on MA 3 in Boston)...

I think the number 7 would qualify - have never been on US 7, and while I've used freeways that were formerly state route 7 in California (Route 14, I-405, and I-710), I have never used the Route 7 that currently exists near El Centro. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Evan_Th on May 23, 2019, 05:44:34 PM
Quote from: Bickendan on May 23, 2019, 01:22:15 PM
Er, what? There aren't any signed county routes in Multnomah County.
Are you talking about ORH 3, OR 43's Highway number?
Yep, Oswego Highway No. 3, aka Oregon Route 43.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on May 24, 2019, 05:45:29 AM
Quote from: TheStranger on May 23, 2019, 01:45:06 PM
Quote from: TheStranger on May 17, 2019, 10:56:47 PM
Quote from: SoCal Kid on May 17, 2019, 10:49:29 PM
Been on US 1 and California SR 1 (every Californian has to have been on it AT LEAST ONCE). Been on CA SR 2 (not Glendale Fwy section). So that would be 3, for me. Been on Interstate 4 and 5, and so on.

I've never been on Route 3 either in any form out here, so that was also my thought for lowest numbered state route I have yet to go to.

Lowest numbered US route I have never gone on is US 2.  Lowest numbered Interstate would be the aforementioned I-4.

A followup:

If we were thinking of lowest numbered route I've never been on, period (since I have been on MA 3 in Boston)...

I think the number 7 would qualify - have never been on US 7, and while I've used freeways that were formerly state route 7 in California (Route 14, I-405, and I-710), I have never used the Route 7 that currently exists near El Centro. 
Since I don't see an obvious entry for you on Travel Mapping, I'm just ruling out the obvious ones here -- Have you been up to Tacoma, and hit up WA 7 at all?
How about Oregon, US 20 anywhere east of Bend (that's ORH 7)?
Quote from: Evan_Th on May 23, 2019, 05:44:34 PM
Quote from: Bickendan on May 23, 2019, 01:22:15 PM
Er, what? There aren't any signed county routes in Multnomah County.
Are you talking about ORH 3, OR 43's Highway number?
Yep, Oswego Highway No. 3, aka Oregon Route 43.
Only possible candidate -- but that's not a county highway ;)

-------------
I really should do my own:
0: CZE D0, HUN M0, BEL R0
1: AUT A1, CHE A1, CZE D1, DEU A3, B1, ENG A1, FRA A1, HUN M1, F1, SVK D1, CAN TCH/BC 1, USA CA 1, ND 1, ORH 1
2: AUT A2, CHE A2, CZE D2, DEU B2r, ENG A2, HUN M2, F2, NLD A2, SVK D2, USA US 2, CA 2, MO 2, ORH 2
3: BEL A3, CHE A3, FRA A3, HUN F3, USA MN 3, ND 3, ORH 3
4: ENG M4, A4, FRA A4, HUN F4, ITA A4, SVK D4, USA CA 4, WA 4, ORH 4
5: AUT A4, CAN ON 5, FRA A5, N5, USA I-5, US 5, MN 5, ORH 5
6: CAN ON 6, FRA A6, N6, USA US 6, MN 6, OR 6, WA 6, ORH 6
7: CZE D7, DEU A7, HUN M7, USA US 7, MO 7, NY 7, WA 7, ORH 7
8: AUT A8, DEU A8, USA NY 8, OR 8
9: CHE A9, DEU A9, USA US 9, NY 9N, ORH 9
10: HUN F10, USA I-10, US 10, OR 10, ORH 10
11: CZE D11, BEL R11, USA OR 11
12: AUT A12, BEL A12, USA I-12, US 12, VT 12
13: AUT A13, CHE A13, USA MN 13, WI 13
14: AUT A14, USA US 14, CA 14T, WA 14, VT 14, ORH 14
15: EUR E15, USA I-15, CO 15, CT 15, MN 15, VT 15, ORH 15
16: AUT S16, USA CA 16, MN 16, WI 16, ORH 16
17: USA CO 17, NM 17, VT 17, ORH 17
18: USA US 18, CA 18, OR 18, ORH 18
19: EUR E19, HUN M19, USA MN 19, OR 19
20: ENG M20, A20, BEL R20, USA I-20, US 20, MN 20, ORH 20
21: AUT A21, BEL R21, USA ID 21, MN 21, ORH 21
22: ITA A22, USA CA 22, CT 22 NY 22, OR 22, VT 22A, ORH 22
23: EUR E23, AUT A23, USA US 23, CA 23, MN 23, WI 23
24: CAN ON 24, USA US 24, CA 24, MN 24
25: EUR E25, AUT A25, BEL A25, ENG M25, USA I-25, ID 25, MN 25, ORH 25
26: FRA A26, USA US 26, MI 26, ORH 26
27: EUR E27, BEL A27, USA IA 27, MN 27, OR 27, ORH 27
28: USA MI 28
29: USA I-29, NY 29, ORH 29
30: USA US 30, MN 30, WI 30, UT 30, ORH 30
31: FRA A31, USA ORH 31
32: USA NY 32, ORH 32
33: USA CA 33, ORH 33
34: EUR E34, USA MN 34, OR 34, SD 34
35: EUR E35, CZE D35, USA OR 35, WI 35, ORH 35
36: USA CA 36, OR 36
37: USA OR 37, SD 37T, ORH 37
38: USA CA 39, MI 38, OR 38, ORH 38
39: FRA A39, USA CA 39, OR 39, ORH 39
40: EUR E40, ENG A40, USA I-40, US 40, ORH 40
41: EUR E41, USA US 41, ORH 41
42: EUR E42, USA OR 42
43: EUR E43, USA MN 43, MO 43, OR 43, ORH 43
44: EUR E44, USA I-44, US 44, CA 44, MN 44, SD 44
45: EUR E45, USA I-45, US 45, SD 45, ORH 45
46: USA OR 46, ORH 46
47: USA MN 47, OR 47, ORH 47
48: <- Lowest highway number not traveled. Closest instance: ORH 48 (US 395), John Day to Burns
49: USA I-49, US 49
50: USA US 50, MN 50, NY 50, WY 50, ORH 50
51: USA US 51, MN 51, OR 51, ORH 51
52: EUR E52, USA US 52, MO 52
53: USA US 53, OR 53, ORH 53
54: EUR E54
55: EUR E55, USA I-55, CA 55, ID 55, MI 55, MN 55
56: EUR E56, USA US 56, MN 56, WI 56
57: ITA A57, USA CA 57, MN 57
58: EUR E58, NLD A58, USA CA 58, OR 58, ORH 58
59: EUR E59, NLD A59, USA US 59, MO 59, WY 59
60: EUR E60, USA US 60, CA 60, MN 60, WI 60
61: USA US 61, ORH 61
62: EUR E62, USA US 62, MN 62, OR 62
63: USA US 63, SD 63, ORH 63
64: USA US 64, AZ 64, MI 64, MN 64, ORH 64
65: EUR E65, USA US 65, MN 65
66: USA CA 66, MO 66, OR 66, ORH 66
67: EUR E67, USA US 67, NY 67, ORH 67
68: USA MN 68, NM 68, ORH 68
69: USA I-69, US 69, ORH 69
70: EUR E70, USA I-70, US 70, ORH 70
71: EUR E71, USA US 71, CA 71
72: USA ORH 72
73: USA CA 73, MN 73
74: USA NM 74, NY 74
75: EUR E75, USA I-75, US 75
76: USA MN 76
77: USA MI 77, MN 77
78: USA WI 78
79: USA SD 79
80: USA I-80, US 80, MN 80
81: <- Runner up
82: USA OR 82, WI 82
83: FRA N83, USA US 83, CA 83
84: USA I-84, US 84, CA 84
85: USA US 85
86: FRA A86, USA MO 86
87: USA I-87, US 87, MN 87, SD 87
88: <- Third place
89: USA I-89, US 89, CA 89, SD 89
90: USA I-90, US 90, CA 90
91: CAN BC 91, USA I-91, CA 91, ORH 91
92: USA UT 92, ORH 92
93: USA US 93, ORH 93
94: USA I-94, MI 94
95: DEU A95, USA I-95, US 95, MN 95
96: DEU A96, USA US 96
97: USA US 97
98: USA US 98
99: CAN BC 99, DEU 99, USA CA 99, OR99, WA 99
100: ENG A100, USA MN 100, WA 100, VT 100, ORH 100
101: USA US 101
102: USA ORH 102
103: USA OR 103, WA 103, ORH 103
104: FRA N104, USA OR 104, WA 104, ORH 104
105: USA I-105, MN 105, WA 105, ORH 105
106: no entry
107: USA WA 107, VT 107
108: USA VT 108
109: no entry
110: USA I-110, CA 110, MN 110, WY 110, ORH 110
111: no entry
112: USA CO 112
113: USA CA 113, USA WI 113
114: no entry
115: USA I-115
116-117: no entries
118: USA CA 118
119: no entry
120: USA CA 120, OR 120, WY 120, ORH 120
121-122: no entries
123: USA MI 123, ORH 123
124-125: no entries
126: USA OR 126
127-129: no entries
130: USA OR 130, WI 130, ORH 130
131: USA OR 131, WI 131, ORH 131
132-133: no entries
134: USA CA 134
135-137: no entries
138: USA OR 138, ORH 138
139: USA CA 139, MN 139
140: USA OR 140, ORH 140
141: USA OR 141, WA 141, ORH 141
142: USA CO 142, ORH 142
143: USA ORH 143
144: USA ORH 144
145: no entry
146: USA UT 146
147-148: no entries
149: USA MN 149, NY 149
150: USA ORH 150
151: USA US 151, ORH 151
152: no entry
153: USA OR 153, ORH 153
154: USA OR 154, ORH 154
155: USA ORH 155
156: no entry
157: USA ORH 157
158: no entry
159: USA CO 159
160: USA US 160, IA 160, ORH 160
161: USA WA 161, ORH 161
162: USA WI 162, ORH 162
163: USA ORH 163
164: USA OR 164, ORH 164
165: USA US 165
166: no entry
167: USA WA 167
168: no entry
169: USA US 169
170: USA CA 170
171: USA ORH 171
172: USA NV 172
173: USA CA 173, OR 173, ORH 173
174: USA ORH 174
175: USA MO 175
176-179: no entries
180: USA US 180, OR 180, ORH 180
181: no entry
182: USA I-182, OR 182, ORH 182
183: no entry
184: USA I-184
185: USA NY 185
186-188: no entries
189: USA I-189, CA 189, ORH 189
190: AUT S190, USA I-190
191: AUT S191, USA US 191, ORH 191
192: no entry
193: USA ORH 193
194: USA I-194, OR 194, ORH 194
195-196: no entries
197: USA US 197, CA 197, MN 197
198: no entry
199: USA US 199
200: USA MN 200, MT 200, OR 200, ORH 200
201: USA OR 201, ORH 201
202: USA US 202, OR 202
203: USA OR 203
204: no entry
205: USA I-205
206-209: no entry
210: USA I-210, CA 210, MN 210, OR 210, ORH 210
211: USA OR 211, ORH 211
212: USA US 212, OR 212, ORH 212
213: USA OR 213
214: USA OR 214
215: USA I-215, ORH 215
216: no entry
217: USA OR 217
218: USA US 218
219: USA OR 219
220: USA I-220
221: USA OR 221
222: USA OR 222, ORH 222
223: USA OR 223
224: USA OR 224
225: USA OR 225, ORH 225
226: USA OR 226, ORH 226
227: USA ORH 227
228: USA OR 228, ORH 228
229: USA OR 229, MTS 229, ORH 229
230: no entry
231: USA ORH 231
232: no entry
233: USA OR 233
234: no entry
235: USA I-235, ORH 235
236: USA ORH 236
237: no entry
238: USA I-238, OR 238
239: no entry
240: USA OR 240, ORH 240
241: no entry
242: USA OR 242
243: no entry
244: USA SD 244
245: USA AR 245
246: USA MN 246
247-248: no entries
249: USA MO 249
250: no entry
251: USA MN 251
252-258: no entries
259: USA CA 259
260-264: no entries
265: USA UT 265
266-269: no entries
270: USA US 270, ORH 270
271: no entry
272: USA ORH 272
273-277: no entries
278: USA I-278
279: no entry
280: USA I-280, MN 280
281: USA US 281, OR 281, ORH 281
282: USA OR 281, ORH 282
283-284: no entries
285: USA US 285
286: no entry
287: USA US 287, CT 287
288-289: no entries
290: USA I-290
291: no entry
292: USA MN 292, ORH 292
293-297: no entries
298: USA MN 298
299: USA CA 299, MN 299
300-301: no entries
302: ENG A302
303-304: no entries
305: USA I-305
306-309: no entries
310: USA US 310
311-314: no entries
315: ENG A315
316-323: no entries
324: USA NY 324
325-329: no entries
330: USA CA 330
331-340: no entries
341: USA NV 341, WY 341
342: USA NV 342
343-350: no entries
351: USA OR 351, ORH 351
352-359: no entries
360: USA ORH 360
361-367: no entries
368: USA CO 368
369: no entry
370: USA CO 370, OR 370, ORH 370
371: USA US 37, CO 371, MN 371
372-379: no entries
380: USA I-380, OR 380, ORH 380
381-384: no entries
385: USA US 385
386-390: no entries
391: FRA A391
392-393: no entries
394: USA I-394
395: USA US 395
396-400: no entries
401: CAN ON 401, ENG A401, USA WA 401
402: CAN ON 402
403: CAN ON 403
404: error highway not found
405: USA I-405
406-408: no entries
409: USA WA 409
410: USA WA 410
411: USA WA 411
412-420: no entries
421: EUR E421
422-423: no entries
424: USA ORH 424
425: no entry
426: USA ORH 426
427-431: no entries
432: USA WA 432
433: USA WA 433
434: no entry
435: USA I-435
436-441: no entries
442: EUR E442
443-450: no entries
451: USA OR 451, ORH 451
452-460: no entries
461: EUR E461
462-469: no entries
470: USA I-470
471-474: no entries
475: USA I-475
476-479: no entries
480: USA ORH 480
481: no entry
482: USA ORH 482
483: USA ORH 483
484: USA ORH 484
485: USA ORH 485
486-490: no entries
491: USA US 491
492-493: no entries
494: USA I-494
495: USA I-495
496-499: no entries
500: USA WA 500
501: USA OR 501, WA 501
502: USA WA 502
503: USA WA 503
504: USA WA 504
505: USA I-505
506-508: no entries
509: USA WA 509
510: USA I-510
511: no entry
512: USA WA 512
513-514: no entries
515: USA I-515
516: USA WA 516
517: no entry
518: USA WA 518
519: no entry
520: USA WA 520
521: no entry
522: USA NM 522
523-527: no entries
528: USA OR 528
529-532: no entries
533: EUR E533
534: no entry
535: USA I-535
536-539: no entries
540: USA I-540
541-548: no entries
549: USA AR 549
550: USA US 550
551: USA OR 551
552: EUR E552
553-568: no entries
569: USA OR 569
570-579: no entries
580: USA I-580
581-588: no entries
589: USA NV 589
590-598: no entries
599: USA NM 599, WA 599
600-604: no entries
605: USA I-605
606-609: no entries
610: USA MN 610
611-674: no entries
675: USA I-675
676-679: no entries
680: USA I-680
681-693: no entries
694: USA I-694
695-704: no entries
705: USA I-705
706-709: no entries
710: USA I-710, CA 710
711-788: no entries
789: USA WY 789
790-800: no entries
801: USA MN 801
802-879: no entries
880: USA I-880
881-894: no entries
895: USA I-895
896-899: no entries
900: USA WA 900
901-979: no entries
980: USA I-980
981-1210: no entries
1211: ENG A1211
1212-3210: no entries
3211: ENG A3211
3212: ENG A3212
3213-5200: no entries
5201: ENG A5201
5202->: no entries
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on May 24, 2019, 01:18:52 PM
Quote from: Bickendan on May 24, 2019, 05:45:29 AM
ORH

What is this?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on May 24, 2019, 01:22:10 PM
Nice easter egg hidden in there.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheStranger on May 24, 2019, 01:25:58 PM
Quote from: Bickendan on May 24, 2019, 05:45:29 AM
Quote from: TheStranger on May 23, 2019, 01:45:06 PM
Quote from: TheStranger on May 17, 2019, 10:56:47 PM
Quote from: SoCal Kid on May 17, 2019, 10:49:29 PM
Been on US 1 and California SR 1 (every Californian has to have been on it AT LEAST ONCE). Been on CA SR 2 (not Glendale Fwy section). So that would be 3, for me. Been on Interstate 4 and 5, and so on.

I've never been on Route 3 either in any form out here, so that was also my thought for lowest numbered state route I have yet to go to.

Lowest numbered US route I have never gone on is US 2.  Lowest numbered Interstate would be the aforementioned I-4.

A followup:

If we were thinking of lowest numbered route I've never been on, period (since I have been on MA 3 in Boston)...

I think the number 7 would qualify - have never been on US 7, and while I've used freeways that were formerly state route 7 in California (Route 14, I-405, and I-710), I have never used the Route 7 that currently exists near El Centro. 
Since I don't see an obvious entry for you on Travel Mapping, I'm just ruling out the obvious ones here -- Have you been up to Tacoma, and hit up WA 7 at all?
How about Oregon, US 20 anywhere east of Bend (that's ORH 7)?

WA 7 was one of the first ones I checked on Google Maps but I think the only times I've been driven around in the Tacoma area involve WA 16 or I-5.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on May 24, 2019, 01:59:30 PM
Quote from: 1 on May 24, 2019, 01:22:10 PM
Nice easter egg hidden in there.

Thanks for making me look!  I missed it the first time.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on May 24, 2019, 03:04:30 PM
Quote from: kphoger on May 24, 2019, 01:18:52 PM
Quote from: Bickendan on May 24, 2019, 05:45:29 AM
ORH

What is this?
The underlying Hwy numbers for Oregon's signed Routes. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 30, 2019, 02:28:43 PM
Ok.  I gave in.  Instead of going off my memory, I went back through my trip records.  Discovered that I had actually been on PA 106, MA 107 and TN 108 (and MO 108, for that matter).  I don't count county routes, but do count state secondary routes.  I also don't count routes that have been decommissioned (e.g., NV 166, unfortunately).

My review takes me up to 125 being the lowest numbered route I haven't been on.  After that, 137 (so close to CT 137) and then, annoyingly, 151 (good chance I was on it when visiting Madison, WI, but I really don't remember; I was being driven by someone else).  So, not all the routes I've been on, but at least one per number:

US   1
MA   2
MA   3
I   4
I   5
US   6
US   7
MA   8
MA   9
I   10
US   11
I   12
US   13
US   14
I   15
I   16
US   17
NY   18
US   19
I   20
MA   21
US   22
US   23
I   24
I   25
I   26
US   27
MA   28
I   29
I   30
US   31
MA   32
MA   33
NY   34
I   35
US   36
I   37
IA   38
I   39
I   40
US   41
NJ   42
I   43
I   44
US   45
IN   46
MA   47
US   48
NY   49
US   50
US   51
US   52
US   53
US   54
I   55
PA   56
I   57
US   58
I   59
US   60
MN   61
US   62
NY   63
I   64
I   65
I   66
US   67
I   68
I   69
I   70
I   71
CT   72
I   73
I   74
I   75
I   76
I   77
I   78
I   79
I   80
I   81
I   82
I   83
I   84
I   85
I   86
I   87
I   88
I   89
I   90
I   91
UT   92
I   93
I   94
I   95
I   96
I   97
US   98
I   99
VT   100
US   101
ME   102
NY   103
NY   104
WI   105
PA   106
MA   107
TN   108
NJ   109
I   110
MA   111
MA   112
US   113
KY   114
I   115
MA   116
US   117
TX   118
US   119
CA   120
GA   121
KY   122
VA   123
NH   124
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on May 30, 2019, 02:32:51 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 30, 2019, 02:28:43 PM
After that, 137

No ON-137?

(Or do routes outside the US not count?)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 30, 2019, 02:34:35 PM
Heh.  Good catch, but yeah, I was reticent to count routes outside of the U.S.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on May 30, 2019, 10:14:57 PM
I guess it's a question for the OP to answer.

I haven't gone as in-depth as some others here, but if I did I would be willing to fill in the blanks with Canadian routes where applicable.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 30, 2019, 10:16:20 PM
I think it's one of those "to each their own" kinds of things.  I'll count my way, others will count their way and it's all good.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on May 30, 2019, 10:22:22 PM
Yes, absolutely agree.

I was actually just surprised that we made it this far without that question being raised.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on May 31, 2019, 03:35:13 AM
Quote from: webny99 on May 30, 2019, 10:22:22 PM
Yes, absolutely agree.

I was actually just surprised that we made it this far without that question being raised.
I mean, I included all the international routes I've been on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on May 31, 2019, 02:07:52 PM
It never occurred to me not consider routes in other countries?  Why would I?

(BTW, zero is not a positive integer.)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 31, 2019, 02:36:06 PM
Quote from: kphoger on May 31, 2019, 02:07:52 PM
It never occurred to me not consider routes in other countries?  Why would I?

(BTW, zero is not a positive integer.)
Because America, freedom, mom, apple pie and international routes are communist.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on May 31, 2019, 02:38:30 PM
And wow, I totally didn't proof-read that post, did I?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on May 31, 2019, 03:19:42 PM
FWIW, when I searched my Travel Mapping list file for the lowest missing number, I searched through a lot of Canadian route entries scattered throughout the file, as well as a few dozen at the end of my file from Guadeloupe (French West Indies), Italy, Mexico, and the United Kingdom. But I'm not sure that any of those non-U.S. entries would've included any foreign route numbers without any corresponding U.S. route entries.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Eth on May 31, 2019, 03:47:10 PM
If I had to exclude non-US routes, it wouldn't change my answer very much, dropping from 47 to 43 (swapping in a GA 37 to the list I gave).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: BrianP on May 31, 2019, 06:42:51 PM
I finally figured mine out: 53
I've crossed NC 53 in a couple of places.  I've crossed MD 53, NY 53, IN 53 and OH 53. I passed the north end of PA 53 and the east end of VA 53.  But no dice. 
US 1 (MD/PA)
MD 2
VA 3
MD 4
MD 5
US 6 (PA/NY)
MD 7
MD 8
US 9 (NY/NJ/DE)
VA 10
US 11 (PA/NY/VA)
NC 12
US 13 (VA/MD/DE/PA)
PA 14
US 15 (PA/MD/VA/NC)
MD 16
US 17 (VA/NC)
MD 18
US 19 (PA)
US 20 (IL)
US 21 (NC)
US 22 (PA/WV/OH)
MD 23
MD 24
MD 25
MD 26
MD 27
MD 28
US 29 (MD/VA/NC)
US 30 (NJ/PA)
MD 31
MD 32
PA 33
MD 34
US 35 (OH/WV)
PA 36
NC 37
NJ 38
NC 39
US 40 (NJ/DE/MD/PA/OH)
NJ 41
NJ 42
MD 43
NJ 44
NJ 45
US 46
NJ 47
US 48
VA 49
US 50 (MD/DC/VA/WV/MD/OH)
PA 51
NJ 52
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Pink Jazz on May 31, 2019, 08:56:46 PM
I don't recall being on a highway numbered 6 in recent memory.  However in 1994 we drove across country from CA to VA, and there was a possibility I might have been on US 6 at some point.  If I actually was on US 6, I don't ever recall being on a highway numbered 7 either.


Here are the routes below 6 that I recall being on
1 - US, CA, DE, PR
2 - PR
3 - PR
4 - Interstate
5 - Interstate, PR, VA


If including routes I have crossed, I have crossed both NM 6 (and probably US 6 as well) and both CA and VA 7, and have been on I-8, US 9, I-10, and PR 10, and have crossed US 11 (and have been on what is now I-11).  Probably the lowest I don't recall being on or crossing is 12.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Evan_Th on June 01, 2019, 08:43:46 PM
If we admit lettered prefixes, I've doubled my previous list!

I've been on:
US 1 (primarily in North Carolina, and several other places up to New York State)
US 2 (in Washington State)
Oswego Highway No. 3 (Macadam Ave, Portland, OR)
Charlotte Route 4 (Billy Graham Pkwy, Charlotte, NC)
I-5 (all the way from Canada south to Salem, OR; and again from Los Angeles south to San Diego)
US 6 (Scranton, PA)
WA 7 (Pacific Ave, Tacoma)
NC 8 (north of Winston-Salem)
NC 9 (Black Mountain, NC)
I-10 (Los Angeles, CA)
US 11 (New York State)
NC 12 (Kitty Hawk)
NY 13 (in Ithaca)
San Diego County Route S14 (Oceanside & Vista, California)
US 15 (periodically from North Carolina to Pennsylvania)
NC 16 (Charlotte, NC)
US 17 (Virginia & NC)
WA 18 (Snoqualmie, WA)
US 19 (Asheville, NC)
WA 20 (North Cascades Highway)
US 21 (Charlotte, NC)
NC 22 (Ramseur, NC)
US 23 (Waynesville, NC)
NC 24 (Fayetteville, NC)
US 25 (Asheville, NC)
I-26 (Asheville, NC)
US 27 (Cincinnati, OH)
I've crossed VA 28, IL 28, SC 28 and the British A28, but never been on any of them.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Kulerage on June 03, 2019, 02:48:29 PM
Interestingly, it might be 2. It just so happens that every state with a Highway 2 is out of our travel's way.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 09, 2019, 03:15:35 PM
Gave a summary of this thread a shot.  Didn't touch people who said something like "somewhere in 100-200" or whatever that was supposed to mean.  Tried to stick to how people counted their number (i.e., if they said it was 100, I put it in there, although it may have included unsigned routes or whatever else that others might not count).  Probably misinterpreted a couple of people's posts, but here we go and can edit as we do:

oscar379
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
Rothman125
paulthemapguy112
amroad17107
Hot Rod Hootenanny106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
Eth47
dlsterer47
136
Buck8734
doorknob6029
ipeters6128
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
US 8921
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
Roadgeekteen14
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
Ben1148
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
mgk9205
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1

Also figured out that I could get up to 241 just with taking a decent day's drive around my area.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on June 09, 2019, 03:19:22 PM
Mine is 14. I said that I have crossed some between 14 and 36, but I have never actually been on a route numbered 14.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 09, 2019, 03:23:22 PM
No problem.  Like I said, I probably misread or misinterpreted some people's responses in here.

oscar379
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
Rothman125
paulthemapguy112
amroad17107
Hot Rod Hootenanny106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
Eth47
dlsterer47
Buck8734
doorknob6029
ipeters6128
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
US 8921
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
Ben1148
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
mgk9205
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: mgk920 on June 09, 2019, 03:41:35 PM
Quote from: mgk920 on May 18, 2019, 10:35:41 AM
For me, I've not yet been on M0 (Budapest Ring Road) in Hungary.

:wow:

In North America, for me it would be '5'.  I came close to US 5 during a couple of late 1990s/early 2000s roadtrips, but was never on it.

I've been on:
- US/DE/IL 1
- US/MA/NY 2
- US/MA 3
- US 4
(5)
- US 6
- US 7
- US 8
- US 9
- US 10
- US/WI 11
(etc)

Mike

Rechecking my travel records, I was on NY 5 (Central Ave) numerous times when I visited a friend in the Albany, NY area a couple of times during the 1998-2000 time frame.

Thus, going over my list again, the lowest numbered highway/route that I've not been on likely is '48'.  WI 48 is a minor state highway in a very out of the way place on the opposite side of the state from me.

Mike
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ben114 on June 10, 2019, 07:09:22 PM
Just realizing I've been on M8 and N19 in Ireland, forgot about those in my original post.

That puts my lowest to 21 26 after counting some more Ireland roads.

Edit 2: 29 now, missed ME 26A.

After that it's 32 34.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 10, 2019, 08:57:21 PM
Ok, then:

oscar379
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
Rothman125
paulthemapguy112
amroad17107
Hot Rod Hootenanny106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ipeters6128
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
US 8921
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on June 12, 2019, 02:33:42 PM
Very weird that 48 is such a common answer. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on June 12, 2019, 02:45:10 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on June 12, 2019, 02:33:42 PM
Very weird that 48 is such a common answer.

48 is the lowest number in the US not used for a freeway (which I found in another thread). Also note 102 being a common answer, which is because it's 3 digits, and 101 is used for several important routes (US 101 and to a lesser extent NH 101).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on June 12, 2019, 04:25:12 PM
Quote from: 1 on June 12, 2019, 02:45:10 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on June 12, 2019, 02:33:42 PM
Very weird that 48 is such a common answer.

48 is the lowest number in the US not used for a freeway (which I found in another thread). Also note 102 being a common answer, which is because it's 3 digits, and 101 is used for several important routes (US 101 and to a lesser extent NH 101).

Also, the most-recent iteration US 48 is a fairly recent route, and it isn't very long.

There's only 14 state routes numbered "48" (15 if you count Florida, which demoted SR 48 to CR 48 a few years ago.)

It seems a lot of the folks in the Pacific and Mountain time zones do not have as many low-numbered routes.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bing101 on June 12, 2019, 09:47:52 PM
US-1
I-2
CA-3

These are routes I never been on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 12, 2019, 11:33:43 PM
Quote from: bing101 on June 12, 2019, 09:47:52 PM
US-1
I-2
CA-3

These are routes I never been on.
Ok, but have you been on a route 1, 2 or 3 anywhere?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on June 13, 2019, 04:32:08 AM
He has clearly been on routes numbered 1 and 2. We don't know about route 3, though.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on June 14, 2019, 06:27:51 PM
Quote from: formulanone on June 12, 2019, 04:25:12 PM
Quote from: 1 on June 12, 2019, 02:45:10 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on June 12, 2019, 02:33:42 PM
Very weird that 48 is such a common answer.

48 is the lowest number in the US not used for a freeway (which I found in another thread). Also note 102 being a common answer, which is because it's 3 digits, and 101 is used for several important routes (US 101 and to a lesser extent NH 101).

Also, the most-recent iteration US 48 is a fairly recent route, and it isn't very long.

There's only 14 state routes numbered "48" (15 if you count Florida, which demoted SR 48 to CR 48 a few years ago.)

It seems a lot of the folks in the Pacific and Mountain time zones do not have as many low-numbered routes.
16, if you count the John Day-Burns segment of US 395. And I do.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bing101 on June 14, 2019, 07:06:28 PM
Quote from: Rothman on June 12, 2019, 11:33:43 PM
Quote from: bing101 on June 12, 2019, 09:47:52 PM
US-1
I-2
CA-3

These are routes I never been on.
Ok, but have you been on a route 1, 2 or 3 anywhere?

CA-1, I-H1 and CA-2 are ones I went to.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on June 14, 2019, 07:10:11 PM
Geez.

Here goes (Some only due to a concurrency, but...):

1, 2:  US
3:  IL
4, 5:  Interstate
6, 7:  US
8:  Interstate
9:  US
10:  Interstate
11:  US
12:  Interstate
13, 14:  US
15:  Interstate
16:  US
17:  Interstate
18:  US
19, 20:  Interstate
21, 22, 23, 24:  US
25, 26, 27:  Interstate
28:  IN
29, 30:  Interstate
31:  US
32:  IN
33, 34, 35, 36:  US
37, 38:  IN
39, 40, 41:  Interstate
42:  US
43, 44, 45:  Interstate
46:  US
47, 48:  IL
49:  Interstate
50, 51, 52, 53, 54:  US
55:  Interstate
56:  US
57:  Interstate
58:  US
59, 60, 61, 62, 63:  US
64, 65, 66:  Interstate
67:  US
68, 69, 70, 71, 72:  Interstate
73:  US
74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81:  Interstate
82, 83:  US
84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91:  Interstate
92:  US
93, 94, 95, 96:  Interstate
97:  IL
98:  US
99:  Interstate
100:  WI
101:  AZ (Loop)
102:  IL
103:  AR
104, 105, 106, 107, 108:  IL
109:  MO
110, 111:  IL
112:  MO
113, 114:  KS
115:  MO
116, 117:  IL
118:  OH
119:  US
120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125:  IL
126:  OR
127:  US
128:  MA
129, 130, 131:  US
132, 133, 134:  IL
135:  Interstate
136:  US
137, 138:  IL
139:  MI
140:  IL
141:  US
142:  WI
143:  AZ
144:  TX
145:  WI
146:  RI
147:  MO
148, 149:  IA
150, 151:  US
152:  IN
153:  AZ (before decommissioned)
154:  IL
155:  Interstate
156:  Hmmm..................
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheStranger on June 14, 2019, 07:59:53 PM
The long form lists make me super curious what is the second-lowest and third-lowest numbers I haven't been on (after 7) -

1: CA, US
2: CA
3: MA
4: CA
5: Interstate
6: US
(7: have not been on any form of Route 7 anywhere)
8: Interstate
9: CA, US
10: Interstate
11: This might be it for second-lowest.  I haven't been on Route 11 near El Centro though I've been pretty close to it, and I have been on parts of the future I-11 corridor long before that was a thing (US 93, I-515).  I've also been on what used to be Route 11 in Los Angeles, now I-110.
12: CA
13: CA
14: CA
15: Interstate, CA
16: CA
17: CA, NY, NJ
18: CA
19: CA
20: CA, US (the latter on a brief concurrency with NY 28 en route to Cooperstown, NY)
21: OH
22: CA, US (the latter via concurrency with I-78 in western New Jersey)
23: CA
24: CA
25: CA
26: This one might be it for third-lowest, depending on if the unsigned concurrency along 99 between the current western terminus of Route 26 and the short portion along Charter Way in Stockton counts.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: corco on June 14, 2019, 08:43:30 PM
I've fully clinched at least one route numbered all the way up to 63.

Having finished seven entire state highway systems and driven a lot more elsewhere, I thought the number would be a lot higher but I have never actually driven on a highway numbered 144.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 14, 2019, 10:23:05 PM
Updated

oscar379
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
plain159
Konza156
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Rothman125
paulthemapguy112
amroad17107
Hot Rod Hootenanny106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ipeters6128
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
US 8921
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: OracleUsr on June 15, 2019, 08:48:41 PM
US 4
I-2
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 15, 2019, 10:01:03 PM
Quote from: OracleUsr on June 15, 2019, 08:48:41 PM
US 4
I-2
What?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on July 10, 2019, 01:00:18 AM
Another update from me: In my latest recent travels, I've filled in some gaps in my list, clinching tiny routes VA 379, VA 398, and (unsigned) VA 399. That makes my lowest untraveled route now 426.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: chesapeake256 on July 10, 2019, 03:42:03 AM
My attempt:

US-1/DE-1
OH-2/FL-2
OH-3
I-4/OH-4
VA-5
US-6
OH-7
FL-8
US-9
I-10 (Jacksonville, FL)
US-11 (Wytheville, VA and Binghamton, NY areas)
NC-12 (Entire route from Corolla to Cedar Island)
US-13 (Hampton Roads area)
WV-14 (near Parkersburg)
FL-15 (south of Jacksonville)
OH-16
US-17
FL-18
US-19
US-20 (Bellevue, OH area)
US-21 (Wytheville, VA area)
US-22 (between Zanesville and Cambridge, OH)
US-23 (between Toledo, OH, and Asheville, NC)
CR-24 (southeast of Amanda, OH)
WV-25
I-26
US-27 (Alt, in Newnan, GA)
WV-28
US-29
US-30
WV-31
OH-32
US-33
WV-34
US-35 (Frankfort, OH to I-64)
US-36
OH-37
OH-38 (due to brief concurrency with OH-161)
VA-39
US-40
US-41 (near Lake City, FL)
US-42
CR-43 (near Royalton, OH)
WV-44
GA-45
FL-46
FL-47 (in Lake City, FL)
US-48 (from Weston, WV, to Strasburg, VA)
VA-49 (in Clarksville, VA)
US-50
PA-51
US-52
OH-53

I can't think of a route 54 at the moment.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on July 11, 2019, 01:46:32 PM
I feel compelled to amend my list as well...
Quote from: Konza on June 14, 2019, 07:10:11 PM
Geez.

Here goes (Some only due to a concurrency, but...):

1, 2:  US
3:  IL
4, 5:  Interstate
6, 7:  US
8:  Interstate
9:  US
10:  Interstate
11:  US
12:  Interstate
13, 14:  US
15:  Interstate
16:  US
17:  Interstate
18:  US
19, 20:  Interstate
21, 22, 23, 24:  US
25, 26, 27:  Interstate
28:  IN
29, 30:  Interstate
31:  US
32:  IN
33, 34, 35, 36:  US
37, 38:  IN
39, 40, 41:  Interstate
42:  US
43, 44, 45:  Interstate
46:  US
47, 48:  IL
49:  Interstate
50, 51, 52, 53, 54:  US
55:  Interstate
56:  US
57:  Interstate
58:  US
59, 60, 61, 62, 63:  US
64, 65, 66:  Interstate
67:  US
68, 69, 70, 71, 72:  Interstate
73:  US
74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81:  Interstate
82, 83:  US
84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91:  Interstate
92:  US
93, 94, 95, 96:  Interstate
97:  IL
98:  US
99:  Interstate
100:  WI
101:  AZ (Loop)
102:  IL
103:  AR
104, 105, 106, 107, 108:  IL
109:  MO
110, 111:  IL
112:  MO
113, 114:  KS
115:  MO
116, 117:  IL
118:  OH
119:  US
120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125:  IL
126:  OR
127:  US
128:  MA
129, 130, 131:  US
132, 133, 134:  IL
135:  Interstate
136:  US
137, 138:  IL
139:  MI
140:  IL
141:  US
142:  WI
143:  AZ
144:  TX
145:  WI
146:  RI
147:  MO
148, 149:  IA
150, 151:  US
152:  IN
153:  AZ (before decommissioned)
154:  IL
155:  Interstate
156:  Hmmm..................
156:  VA.  I've been from both US 60 and I-64 into the Richmond Airport, and I don't think you can do that without traveling VA 156
157:  IL
158:  WI
159, 160:  US
161:  TX.  Bush Tollway in the DFW area
162:  IL
163:  IA
164, 165:  WI
166, 167:  US
168:  MO
169:  US
170:  Interstate
171:  IL
172:  Interstate
173:  IL
174:  MO
175:  WI
176:  IL
177:  KS.  The Flint Hills.
178:  IL
179:  AZ.  To Sedona.
180:  US
181:  AZ.  To the Chiricahuas.
182:  AL.  Gulf Shores.
183:  TX
184:  Ain't happened yet, but there's one in NM just north of El Paso.  Next time I head east...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: chesapeake256 on July 11, 2019, 06:20:51 PM
Quote from: chesapeake256 on July 10, 2019, 03:42:03 AM
My attempt:

US-1/DE-1
OH-2/FL-2
OH-3
I-4/OH-4
VA-5
US-6
OH-7
FL-8
US-9
I-10 (Jacksonville, FL)
US-11 (Wytheville, VA and Binghamton, NY areas)
NC-12 (Entire route from Corolla to Cedar Island)
US-13 (Hampton Roads area)
WV-14 (near Parkersburg)
FL-15 (south of Jacksonville)
OH-16
US-17
FL-18
US-19
US-20 (Bellevue, OH area)
US-21 (Wytheville, VA area)
US-22 (between Zanesville and Cambridge, OH)
US-23 (between Toledo, OH, and Asheville, NC)
CR-24 (southeast of Amanda, OH)
WV-25
I-26
US-27 (Alt, in Newnan, GA)
WV-28
US-29
US-30
WV-31
OH-32
US-33
WV-34
US-35 (Frankfort, OH to I-64)
US-36
OH-37
OH-38 (due to brief concurrency with OH-161)
VA-39
US-40
US-41 (near Lake City, FL)
US-42
CR-43 (near Royalton, OH)
WV-44
GA-45
FL-46
FL-47 (in Lake City, FL)
US-48 (from Weston, WV, to Strasburg, VA)
VA-49 (in Clarksville, VA)
US-50
PA-51
US-52
OH-53

I can't think of a route 54 at the moment.


Just realized that since I followed all of the currently-open Coalfields Expressway, and from there Slab Fork Rd, and went through Mullens, I would have followed WV-97 and WV-54.

WV-54 (Slab Fork to Mullens)
WV-55/VA-55 (Fort Valley area to Moorefield)
OH-56 (Ash Cave area)
WV-57 (I believe I have followed the entire route, knowing that on one route I went through New Milton, West Milford, Philippi, and Elkins.)
US-58 (Gate City, VA to Bristol; also Damascus to Mouth of Wilson, and Meadows of Dan to Virginia Beach)
CR-59 (Lane Ave in Franklin Co., OH)
US-60
WV-61
US-62
VA-63 (Briefly, in Haysi, VA)
I-64
WV-65 (access to King Coal Highway in Mingo Co.)
I-66 (Front Royal, VA area)
OH-67 (in Upper Sandusky)
I-68 (in Cumberland, MD area)
CR-69 (West Case Rd in Franklin Co., OH)
I-70 (Springfield, OH to at least Cambridge, OH)
I-71 (Cleveland to Cincinnati)
OH-72 (in Springfield, OH)
I-73 (Rockingham to High Point)
I-74 (Lumberton to Mt. Airy, disregarding the gaps)
I-75 (Cincinnati, OH, to Lake City, FL)
US-76 (Bolton, NC, to Chadbourn)
I-77 (Cambridge to Caldwell, OH; also Charleston, WV, to Columbia, SC)
OH-78 (Woodsfield, OH, to OH-536)
I-79 (Clarksburg WV to Weston)
US-80 (Geneva, GA, to Talbotton)
I-81 (Lexington-Staunton; also Wytheville-Ft. Chiswell)
US-82 (Tifton, GA, to Albany, GA)
OH-83 (due to concurrency with OH-16 in Coshocton)

Not sure if I've been on a route 84
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: tolbs17 on July 12, 2019, 02:26:59 AM
Never been out the west so the lowest I've been on is probably I-35 or I-55.

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 12, 2019, 02:35:56 PM
Updated with those that provided data that could be added or updated:

oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Rothman125
paulthemapguy112
amroad17107
Hot Rod Hootenanny106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ipeters6128
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
US 8921
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on July 12, 2019, 02:58:51 PM
After driving on UT 21 near Great Basin National Park, my lowest untraveled number is now 46.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 12, 2019, 03:25:22 PM
Ok...


oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Rothman125
paulthemapguy112
amroad17107
Hot Rod Hootenanny106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
US 8946
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ipeters6128
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: adwerkema on July 14, 2019, 01:36:22 PM
1: US
2: US
3: US
4: MN/IA
5: Interstate
6: US
7: US
8: MA
9: IN
10: US/Interstate
11: US
12: UT
13: WI
14: US
15: Interstate
16: US
17: Interstate
18: NC
19: US
20: Interstate
21: US
22: US
23: US
24: US
25: US
26: Interstate
27: Interstate
28: MI
29: Interstate/US
30: Interstate/US
31: US
32: ME
33: US
34: US
35: Interstate/MI
36: US
37: MI
38: GA
39: Interstate
40: Interstate/US
41: Interstate/US
42: US
43: Interstate
44: Interstate/MI
45: US
46: MI
47: MA
48: MI
49: Interstate
50: US/MI
51: US
52: MI
53: US
54: US
55: Interstate
56: US
57: Interstate
58: US
59: US
60: US
61: US
62: US
63: US
64: Interstate/US
65: Interstate
66: Interstate
67: US
68: Interstate
69: Interstate
70: Interstate
71: Interstate
72: Interstate
73: FL
74: Interstate
75: Interstate
76: Interstate
77: Interstate
78: Interstate
79: Interstate
80: Interstate
81: Interstate
82: US
83: US
84: US
85: Interstate
86: Interstate
87: Interstate/US
88: Interstate
89: US
90: Interstate
91: Interstate
92: IA
93: Interstate
94: Interstate
95: Interstate
96: Interstate
97: US
98: US
99: Interstate
100: ME
101: US
102: ME
103: VT
104: MI
105: ME
106: MI
107: MI
108: ???

I have intersected a couple 108's, but have never been on one.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 24, 2019, 06:57:49 PM
Updated:


oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Rothman137
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Hot Rod Hootenanny106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
US 8946
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ipeters6128
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: tolbs17 on July 25, 2019, 05:29:59 PM
I-2
I-5
I-15
I-25 etc. I will put all the numbers and routes when I get a chance to.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 25, 2019, 07:06:19 PM
I'm up to 153:

SystemNumber
US1
US2
US3
I4
I5
US6
US7
MA8
US9
I10
US11
I12
US13
US14
I15
I16
US17
NY18
US19
I20
MA21
US22
US23
I24
I25
I26
US27
MA28
I29
I30
US31
MA32
MA33
NY34
I35
US36
I37
IA38
I39
I40
US41
NJ42
I43
I44
US45
IN46
MA47
US48
NY49
US50
US51
US52
US53
US54
I55
PA56
I57
US58
I59
US60
MN61
US62
NY63
I64
I65
I66
US67
I68
I69
I70
I71
CT72
I73
I74
I75
I76
I77
I78
I79
I80
I81
I82
I83
I84
I85
I86
I87
I88
I89
I90
I91
UT92
I93
I94
I95
I96
I97
US98
I99
VT100
US101
ME102
NY103
NY104
WI105
PA106
MA107
TN108
NJ109
I110
MA111
MA112
US113
KY114
I115
MA116
US117
TX118
US119
CA120
GA121
KY122
VA123
NH124
VT125
NY126
US127
MA128
US129
US130
US131
MA 132
MO133
VA134
I135
US136
ME137
RI138
TN139
I140
US141
NY142
MA143
NY144
MS145
MA146
MA147
UT148
NY149
US150
NY151
MI152
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 25, 2019, 07:08:55 PM
Updated:


oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
Rothman153
dfilpus149
corco144
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Hot Rod Hootenanny106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
US 8946
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ipeters6128
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cwf1701 on August 25, 2019, 10:51:37 PM
My List:
M-1
OH-2
M-3
OH-4
M-5
M-6 (1970s during construction of I-696)
AL-7 (unsigned Alabama highway)
M-8
IN-9
M-10
US-11 (unsigned AL-7)
US-12

i say mine would be 13
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 30, 2019, 06:14:40 PM
And I'm now up to 216. :)

US1
US2
US3
I4
I5
US6
US7
MA8
US9
I10
US11
I12
US13
US14
I15
I16
US17
NY18
US19
I20
MA21
US22
US23
I24
I25
I26
US27
MA28
I29
I30
US31
MA32
MA33
NY34
I35
US36
I37
IA38
I39
I40
US41
NJ42
I43
I44
US45
IN46
MA47
US48
NY49
US50
US51
US52
US53
US54
I55
PA56
I57
US58
I59
US60
MN61
US62
NY63
I64
I65
I66
US67
I68
I69
I70
I71
CT72
I73
I74
I75
I76
I77
I78
I79
I80
I81
I82
I83
I84
I85
I86
I87
I88
I89
I90
I91
UT92
I93
I94
I95
I96
I97
US98
I99
VT100
US101
ME102
NY103
NY104
WI105
PA106
MA107
TN108
NJ109
I110
MA111
MA112
US113
KY114
I115
MA116
US117
TX118
US119
CA120
GA121
KY122
VA123
NH124
VT125
NY126
US127
MA128
US129
US130
US131
MA 132
MO133
VA134
I135
US136
ME137
RI138
TN139
I140
US141
NY142
MA143
NY144
MS145
MA146
MA147
UT148
NY149
US150
NY151
MI152
VT153
UT154
I155
NY156
NY157
US158
MA159
US160
IL161
IN162
US163
MO164
I165
NY166
US167
CA168
US169
NY170
PA171
TN172
CT173
CT174
I175
I176
CT177
CT178
CT179
I180
MA181
I182
MA183
I184
I185
ME186
MD187
CT188
I189
I190
US191
US192
MD193
I194
I195
I196
MD197
NY198
US199
MD200
MD201
US202
CA203
VA204
I205
US206
FL207
NJ208
US209
MD210
US211
MD212
CT213
ME214
I215
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 30, 2019, 06:16:35 PM
Updated:


oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Rothman216
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Hot Rod Hootenanny106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
US 8946
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ipeters6128
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ipeters61 on September 01, 2019, 09:57:46 PM
Well I can update mine from 28, I drove WV-28 this morning.  Looks like 35 is my new lowest I haven't been on.

(from my memory, may be inconsistent with what I've written in the past)
0s: US-1/DE-1, CT-2/DE-2, CT-3/DE-3/PA-3, CT-4/DE-4, US-5/DE-5, US-6/DE-6, US-7/DE-7, CT-8/DE-8/MD-8, US-9/CT-9/DE-9
10s: CT-10/DE-10, US-11/CT-11/DE-11, CT-12/DE-12, US-13, CT-14/DE-14, US-15/CT-15/DE-15/NY-15, CT-16/DE-16, US-17/CT-17/NJ-17/NY-17, DE-18/NJ-18, US-19/MD-19
20s: US-20/CT-20/DE-20/MD-20, MD-21, US-22/MD-22, DE-23/PA-23, DE-24, CT-25, DE-26/NJ-26, CT-27/NJ-27, WV-28, US-29/PA-29/NJ-29
30s: US-30/CT-30/DE-30, CT-31, CT-32/MD-32/PA-32, PA-33*, CT-34

* Did not drive it myself, but have ridden on it with my grandparents driving

EDIT - I forgot to include NJ-29 in my list.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ftballfan on September 02, 2019, 04:49:43 PM
1: US-1/MI-1
2: OH-2
3: MI-3
4: I-4/OH-4
5: MI-5
6: MI-6
7: (none)
8: MI-8
9: (none)
10: US-10/MI-10
11: MI-11
12: US-12/OH-12
13: MI-13/OH-13
14: MI-14
15: OH-15
16: (none)
17: US-17/MI-17
18: MI-18/OH-18
19: US-19/OH-19
20: US-20/MI-20
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 05, 2019, 11:41:57 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 21, 2019, 10:15:25 PM
106 (There is no Ohio 106 (anymore), so the nearest one to me would be in Michigan)
Drove a 1/2 mile of M-106 in Jackson today (construction on I-94 made this harder to do than I originally envisioned)
I have a 107 (Louisiana), so now I need to drive on a 108
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: deathtopumpkins on September 06, 2019, 12:22:43 PM
Starting with US routes, then if not found checking MA routes, interstates, other state routes (in somewhat random order), and routes in other countries.

1: US
2: US
3: US
4: US
5: US
6: US
7: US
8: MA
9: US
10: MA
11: US
12: MA
13: US
14: US
15: US
16: MA
17: US
18: MA
19: MA
20: US
21: MA
22: US
23: US
24: MA
25: MA
26: I
27: MA
28: MA
29: US
30: US
31: MA
32: MA
33: MA
34: CT
35: MA
36: MA
37: MA
38: MA
39: MA
40: US
41: US
42: NC
43: MA
44: US
45: US
46: US
47: MA
48: England (M48)
49: MA
50: US
51: OK (this one's a stretch - only counting the I-244 multiplex in Tulsa, but it is signed!)
52: ME
53: MA
54: NC
55: I
56: MA
57: MA
58: US
59: I
60: US
61: PA
62: US
63: US
64: US
65: US
66: MA
67: MA
68: MA
69: US
70: US
71: MA
72: CT
73: ME
74: NY
75: US
76: I
77: US
78: MA
79: MA
80: US
81: MA
82: NY
83: MA
84: US
85: MA
86: I
87: I
88: MA
89: I
90: I
91: I
92: NONE - nearest one I haven't been on looks to be ME
93: I
94: I
95: I
96: MA
97: MA
98: MA
99: MA

So 92 is the only number under 100 I haven't been on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 12, 2019, 01:52:52 PM
Updated:



oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Rothman216
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
Hot Rod Hootenanny108
amroad17107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
ftballfan21
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ftballfan on September 13, 2019, 11:53:05 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 12, 2019, 01:52:52 PM
Updated:



oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Rothman216
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
Hot Rod Hootenanny108
amroad17107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
ftballfan21
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1

My lowest would be 7, not 21
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: noelbotevera on September 14, 2019, 02:44:45 AM
Well, don't expect greatness. Here's my list.

US 1
MA 2
US 3
OH 4
US 5
US 6
NY 7
CT 8
US 9
PA 10
US 11
PA 12
US 13
RI 14
US 15
PA 16
NY 17
MA 18
US 19
A-20
NJ 21
US 22
PA 23
PA 24
NY 25
PA 26
NY 27
PA 28
US 29
US 30
PA 31
WV 32
PA 33
PA 34
PA 35
PA 36
VA 37
MA 38
PA 39
I-40
US 41
NJ 42

US 44
PA 45
US 46

US 48

PA 50
PA 51
DE 52

WV 54
WV 55
PA 56
MD 57
MD 58

US 60
PA 61

MD 63
MD 64
I-65
I-66

I-68

I-70
I-71
PA 72
PA 73
PA 74
PA 75
I-76
I-77
I-78
I-79
I-80
I-81

I-83
I-84
I-85
I-86
I-87
I-88

I-90
I-91

I-93
PA 94
I-95
PA 96
I-97

I-99
PA 100

Lowest is 43, but other than that I have 1-100 almost filled.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 14, 2019, 01:14:53 PM
Quote from: ftballfan on September 13, 2019, 11:53:05 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 12, 2019, 01:52:52 PM
Updated:



oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Rothman216
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
Hot Rod Hootenanny108
amroad17107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
ftballfan21
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1

My lowest would be 7, not 21
Heh.  I just went to the bottom of your list.  I will fix it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: epzik8 on September 15, 2019, 05:40:52 PM
Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana and Louisiana route 1.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 16, 2019, 09:21:25 AM
Updated.  Not sure what epzik means by his post, though (hasn't been on a route 2?).




oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Rothman216
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
Hot Rod Hootenanny108
amroad17107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
ftballfan7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 30, 2019, 10:13:02 PM
I can now take my "number streak" up to 122.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: stevashe on October 31, 2019, 12:21:15 AM
Might as well answer for myself:

1: CA, MI
2: US
3: WA, CA
4: I-4, CA
5: I-5, MN, MI
6: OR, MI
7: WA
8: I-8, MI
9: WA, CA
10: I-10, OR, MI
11: WA, MI
12: US, CA
13: CA, MN
14: WA, MI
15: I-15
16: WA, CA
17: CA
18: WA

Haven't been on a 19. Have crossed both WA-19 and CA-19 but not been on either. And unfortunately closing that gap wouldn't move me up much since I haven't been on a 21 either!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 7/8 on October 31, 2019, 09:37:31 PM
It looks like I can go up to 87 (using travel mapping as my resource: http://travelmapping.net/shields/clinched.php?units=km&u=7_8&cort=traveled (http://travelmapping.net/shields/clinched.php?units=km&u=7_8&cort=traveled)). Therefore, 88 is my lowest route I haven't been on. I may have missed some routes but this already took too long :-D.

1: AB, DE, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, IN, MB, NB, NS, PEI, SK, US
2: AB, Estonia, NB, ON, PEI, SK, US
3: AB, BC, Finland, IL, NY, ON, US, VA, WV
4: Interstate, NS, OH, ON, Estonia, Finland, ME, US
5: GA, Latvia ("A5"), MB, ME, MO, NY, ON, QC, SK
6: MN, ON, PEI, US, VA
7: DE, GA, Ile-de-France ("D7"), MO, ON, PEI, US
8: ME, NC, NS, ON, PEI, SK
9: CO, DE, IN, Latvia ("A9"), ME, NY ("9P"), ON, SC, SK, US
10: Latvia ("A10"), MB, MI, NE, ON, SK, QC
11: NC, ON, SK, US, WI
12: Europe ("E12"), OH, ON, US
13: MO, PEI, QC, US, WI
14: AR, MI, OH, US
15: Interstate, ME, MI, OH, ON, QC, US
16: Interstate, MB, NB, NH, ON, SK, US, WV
17: ME, NY, ON, US
18: OH, US
19: MI, NY ("19A"), ON, US
20: Europe ("E20"), ON, QC, SK, US, Winnipeg
21: AR, NY, ON, US
22: AB, Europe ("E22"), GA, NY, US
23: AR, IL, IN, MB, ME, ON, PEI, US
24: Interstate, NC, ON, US
25: Interstate, MI
26: Interstate, ME, NH, ON, US
27: ME, US
28: MI, NY ("28N"), ON
29: IL, NY, US
30: Iceland, MI, NY, QC, US, UT, VA
31: SC, US
32: MO
33: NY, ON, US
34: OH, US
35: CO, Iceland, Interstate, ON, SK, US
36: Iceland, NY, US
37: Iceland, IN, NY, ON, SD
38: IA, ID, IN, NC, NJ, SC
39: Interstate, MI, NY
40: Iceland, Interstate, ON, QC, US
41: Iceland, NC, ON, US, WV
42: US, Winnipeg
43: ME, MN, NC
44: Interstate, SD
45: MB, SD, TN
46: MI
47: SK
48: ON
49: Iceland, MI, OH
50: NC, NY, QC, SD, US
51: US
52: CO, US, Winnipeg
53: IL, MI, NC, PA, US
54: US
55: Interstate, MI, NC, QC, UT
56: NY, SK, VA
57: Interstate, SC
58: NC, ON, US
59: MB
60: ON
61: KY, US, WV
62: MI, ON, US
63: NY, SD, US
64: IL, Interstate, MI, MO, NY, US
65: Interstate, PA, US
66: Interstate, MI, OH
67: CO, Europe ("E67"), IN, NY
68: MI, NY
69: Interstate
70: KY, Interstate, US
71: Interstate, US
72: Interstate
73: Interstate, MN, NJ, PA, QC, SD
74: CO, Interstate, NY, PA, US
75: Europe ("E75"), Interstate, MB, US
76: Interstate, MO, US
77: Interstate, MI, US
78: MI, NY
79: Interstate, SD
80: Interstate, US
81: Interstate, US
82: CO
83: Interstate, MB, US
84: Interstate
85: Interstate, ON, US, Winnipeg
86: Interstate, MI, MO
87: Interstate, NC, US
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on October 31, 2019, 10:02:00 PM
^ Fortunately, NY has a state route 88 not too far away!  :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 7/8 on October 31, 2019, 11:01:49 PM
Quote from: webny99 on October 31, 2019, 10:02:00 PM
^ Fortunately, NY has a state route 88 not too far away!  :D

It would also be a good opportunity for me to get Wayne County :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 08, 2019, 01:21:32 PM
Updated:




oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Rothman216
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny122
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
ftballfan7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheGrassGuy on November 26, 2019, 03:40:13 PM
1: US, DE, Shanghai, Trans-CA Hwy
2: US, Guodao, Zhejiang
3: NJ, RI, ME
4: RI
5: Interstate
6: US
7: WA
8: none, I lose
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 18, 2019, 03:26:14 PM



oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
Rothman216
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny122
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
dlsterer47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
ftballfan7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1

Updated
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: HTM Duke on December 19, 2019, 08:44:55 PM
The lowest number for me is 248.  When I still lived in the DC area, the closest I would have ever gotten would have been old MD-248.  Unfortunately, that was decommissioned some 70+ years ago.  Presently there is no FL-248, so I think this number will stick for a while.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: sbeaver44 on December 26, 2019, 09:53:55 PM
Looks like 102 for me.  I will have to solve that with a trip to Meadville PA sometime.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on December 27, 2019, 09:28:25 AM
Quote from: HTM Duke on December 19, 2019, 08:44:55 PM
The lowest number for me is 248.  When I still lived in the DC area, the closest I would have ever gotten would have been old MD-248.  Unfortunately, that was decommissioned some 70+ years ago.  Presently there is no FL-248, so I think this number will stick for a while.

There's a CR 248 northeast of Branford off FL 247, though Street View's old images do not show signs.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on January 05, 2020, 03:14:50 PM
By virtue of driving on part of FL 47 over the holiday break, my lowest numbered route that I haven't been on has increased from 47 to 53.

This range has a couple of close calls:
I drove on MD 46 many times while numbered as such, but it is now decommissioned.  But to me it counts!
The only 48 I could find was a couple of blocks of NC 48 in Rocky Mount, shorter than any Highway Browser single segment - but I was on it.
NC 49 only had a block where it was concurrent with US 64 near Asheboro, but I at least have a reasonable segment of Iceland 49 to legitimize the number.

Now to start looking for a route 53 near me :)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on January 05, 2020, 06:38:13 PM
I finally figured mine out. It's 142.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on January 06, 2020, 11:34:17 AM
Quote from: hbelkins on January 05, 2020, 06:38:13 PM
I finally figured mine out. It's 142.

That's a shame.  IL-142 is a rather pleasant drive.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on January 06, 2020, 01:51:44 PM
Quote from: kphoger on January 06, 2020, 11:34:17 AM
Quote from: hbelkins on January 05, 2020, 06:38:13 PM
I finally figured mine out. It's 142.

That's a shame.  IL-142 is a rather pleasant drive.

Belay that. I've been on KY 142, as it has a short concurrency with KY 54. Now to go back and see what my next route might be.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on January 06, 2020, 02:01:31 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on January 06, 2020, 01:51:44 PM

Quote from: kphoger on January 06, 2020, 11:34:17 AM

Quote from: hbelkins on January 05, 2020, 06:38:13 PM
I finally figured mine out. It's 142.

That's a shame.  IL-142 is a rather pleasant drive.

Belay that. I've been on KY 142, as it has a short concurrency with KY 54. Now to go back and see what my next route might be.

But is it officially KY-142 at that point??   ;-)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on January 06, 2020, 08:31:52 PM
This is hard for me, because I've clinched New York (which has most numbers below the 400s) and done a decent amount of driving in Pennsylvania and Ohio, which have lots of routes.

The lowest number not present in New York is 47, but I have been on that route in 6 other states. Next is 57...3 states. Then it's 152, which I have also been on in 3 states. 154 I have been on in CT, 181 in MA and NJ, 188 in CT and OH, 191 in 3 states plus the US route, 192 in CT.

194, however, I have nothing for. Route doesn't exist in NY and I have never been on any of the I-194s. If I had (may need to head over to Hartford to clinch CT 194...), my lowest would be 288.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on January 07, 2020, 10:35:57 PM
I was just thinking about this and came up with an interesting and semi-related question:

What is the lowest number that is not in use anywhere?  (Positive integers only, so no smart-asses need post with huge negative numbers.  Or fractional numbers.  :pan: )

Feel free to apply whatever ground rules you like, keeping with the spirit of the question.  USA only, or the whole world.  Posted only, or both posted and non-posted.  Might be interesting to see the lowest unused number among those documented in the "Travel Mapping" database.

As it applies to this topic, it would indicate an upper bound that some of our more intrepid travelers may choose to chase.  :bigass:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on January 07, 2020, 11:04:11 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 07, 2020, 10:35:57 PM
Might be interesting to see the lowest unused number among those documented in the "Travel Mapping" database.

TM doesn't cover a lot of secondary routes in Pennsylvania and North Carolina with numbers (no route markers, but sometimes signed in some other way) in the 1000s.

I'm not awake enough, or adept enough at programming, to search for the lowest unused number in the TM database, especially with some non-U.S. jurisdictions (and a few in the U.S.) including some very high-numbered routes.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 07, 2020, 11:41:47 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 07, 2020, 10:35:57 PM
I was just thinking about this and came up with an interesting and semi-related question:

What is the lowest number that is not in use anywhere?  (Positive integers only, so no smart-asses need post with huge negative numbers.  Or fractional numbers.  :pan: )

Feel free to apply whatever ground rules you like, keeping with the spirit of the question.  USA only, or the whole world.  Posted only, or both posted and non-posted.  Might be interesting to see the lowest unused number among those documented in the "Travel Mapping" database.

As it applies to this topic, it would indicate an upper bound that some of our more intrepid travelers may choose to chase.  :bigass:
The number would be very high given places like Kentucky and Texas (given Farm or Ranch to Market Routes).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 07, 2020, 11:49:48 PM
Among routes currently mapped in TM, the lowest unrepresented number is 1386, and the only other numbers less than 1500 that are not represented are 1467, 1478, 1480, and 1493.

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 07, 2020, 11:52:48 PM
Quote from: Jim on January 07, 2020, 11:49:48 PM
Among routes currently mapped in TM, the lowest unrepresented number is 1386, and the only other numbers less than 1500 that are not represented are 1467, 1478, 1480, and 1493.
HA!  I believe I was on KY 1386 before it was decommissioned.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on January 08, 2020, 12:03:49 PM
Well, the 1-2-3 road sign challenge thread is up to 2257 already and still going.

Of those already mentioned...
1386 – Texas FM-1386 (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=17783.msg2250204#msg2250204)
1467 – Texas FM-1467 (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=17783.msg2266418#msg2266418)
1478 – Texas FM-1478 (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=17783.msg2269402#msg2269402)
1480 – Texas FM-1480 (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=17783.msg2269853#msg2269853)
1493 – Texas FM-1493 (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=17783.msg2272550#msg2272550)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 08, 2020, 12:11:52 PM




oscar426
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Rothman216
cl94194
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny122
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
dlsterner53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Buck8734
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
ftballfan7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1

Updated.  Waiting on hbelkins... :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on January 09, 2020, 12:00:03 AM
Quote from: Rothman on January 08, 2020, 12:11:52 PM

Updated.

Thanks for the chart - an always interesting view.  Just one nitpick - a typo in my username - there's a "n" in there.  :)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on January 27, 2020, 02:15:24 PM
After quite a bit of research, looks like mine is 298. I have been on a route numbered 1 through 297, but no 298s. I've seen 298s in Kentucky and Tennessee, but haven't been on them.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Buck87 on January 30, 2020, 11:12:06 AM
My previous entry was 34, but this past summer I was on US 34 in Lincoln, NE. Filling that gap really opened the door for my lowest number not traveled on to jump up quite a bit....after doing a bit of research, my new number is 107.

Edited to include my list. Rather than attempting to list every single instance of a number I've been on, this is simplified to whichever is highest on an Interstate-US Route-Ohio route-other state route hierarchy.   

US 1
US 2
OH 3
I-4
I-5
US 6
OH 7
I-8
OH 9
I-10
OH 11
I-12
US 13
US 14
I-15
I-16
US 17
OH 18
US 19
I-20
US 21
US 22
US 23
I-24
I-25
I-26
US 27
OH 28
I-29
I-30
US 31
OH 32
US 33
US 34
I-35
US 36
OH 37
OH 38
I-39
I-40
US 41
US 42
OH 43
I-44
OH 45
US 46
OH 47
US 48
I-49
US 50
US 51
US 52
OH 53
GA 54
I-55
OH 56
I-57
OH 58
I-59
US 60
OH 61
US 62
US 63
I-64
I-65
I-66
US 67
I-68
I-69
I-70
I-71
I-72
OH 73
I-74
I-75
I-76
I-77
I-78
I-79
I-80
I-81
OH 82
I-83
I-84 (both)
I-85
I-86 (east)
I-87
I-88 (east)
I-89
I-90
I-91
US 92
I-93
I-94
I-95
I-96
OH 97
US 98
US 99
OH 100
US 101
RI 102
OH 103
OH 104
OH 105
GA 106
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 30, 2020, 11:47:58 AM





oscar426
formulanone348
hbelkins298
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Rothman216
cl94194
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny122
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
dlsterner53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
ftballfan7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on January 30, 2020, 02:56:59 PM
Evidence of my answer of 112:

1: US(ME), IL, IN, IA, TCH(PEI), NB, CA
2: US(NH, MT) IL, IN, OH, IA, WV, RI, NB
3: US(NH), IL, IN, IA, ME, MA
4: US(NY), IL, IN, WA, OH, FL, NS
5: I-(CA), US(VT), IL
6: US(IL), IL, MI, TX, MO, ON
7: US(VT), IL, IN, UT, NY, KS, WA, NS, NB
8: I-(CA), US(MI), IL, IN, IA, NY, NB
9: US(NY), IL, IN, UT, IA, ME, MA
10: I-(MS), US(MI), IL, IN, IA, NY
11: US(AL), WI, MI, IN, ME
12: I-(LA), US(WI), UT, CA, IA, OH, MA, NC
13: IL, WI, AL, IA, MI, MT, CA
14: IN, IL, US(WY), WA
15: I-(UT), US(SC), IL, WI, OH, MS, NB, QC
16: I-(GA), US(WY), IL, IN, IA, MA, NH, WA, NB
17: I-(AZ), US(NC), IL, IN, VT, NY, CA
18: US(IA), IL, IN, OH, MI, VT, NH, WA
19: US(WV), IL, IN, WI, UT, WA, NS
20: I-(AL), US(ID), WI, WV, WA, QC
21: US(SC), IL, WI, ID
22: WI, IL, IN, WY
23: US(OH), IL, IN, WI
24: I-(KY), US(IN), WI, UT, CA
25: I-(WY), US(KY), IL, IN, MT
26: I-(SC), US(OR), IL, IN, MI
27: US(IN), WI, IA, MO, ME
28: NV, CA, IN, NY, OH, MI, MA, MT
29: I-(ND), US(FL), IL, OH
30: I-(AR), US(IL), WI, MI, NY, LA, UT
31: US(MI), IL, WI, ID
32: IL, WI, IN, KS, ID
33: US(OH), MI, IL, WI, NH, RI, ID
34: US(CO), IL, WV, MI, CT, TX, SC
35: I-(IA), US(WV), IL, WI, MI, OR
36: US(MO), MI, KY, ID
37: I-(TX), MI, IN, RI
38: OH, IL, IN, OH, MI, UT, SC
39: I-(IL), WI
40: I-(AR), US(OH), IL, MI, MT, QC
41: I-(WI), US(IN), IL, WV, OH, MI, AL, CO
42: US(OH), LA, WI, SD
43: I-(WI), US(AL), IN, IL
44: I-(MO), US(RI), IN, CA, LA, KY
45: US(IL), MI, IN
46: IN, MI, ID
47: IL, IN
48: IL
49: IL, IN, MT
50: US(IN), IL, MI
51: US(IL), AZ, MI
52: US(IL), CA, MI, TN, WI
53: IL
54: US(IL), IL, IN, OH, MI
55: I-(IL), IN, MI, MN
56: US(KS), IL, IN, KY
57: US(TX), I-(IL), IL, MS, WI, IA
58: IL, IN, NY, IA
59: I-(MS), US(IA), IN, UT, WY
60: US(AZ), IL, IN, WI
61: US(IA), IL, IN
62: US(KY), IN, IL, OR
63: US(IA), IN, OH, UT
64: I-(IL), US(NC), IL, IN, MI, AR, CO, IA
65: I-(IN), MI
66: OR, MI, IN, KS
67: US(IL), WI
68: IL, US(OH)
69: I-(MI), IN, AZ, WI
70: IL, I-(IL), WI, IN
71: IL, I-(OH), US(IA)
72: IL, I-(IL), US(AL), OH
73: IL, US(KS), OH, MI, WI
74: I-(IL), US(NC), NY, AZ
75: IL, I-(TN), US(IA), WI
76: IL, I-(CO), US(NC)
77: ME, US(NE), AR, AZ
78: IL, US(AL)
79: US(AR), SD
80: I-(IL), US(AL), WI
81: IL, I-(PA), WI, IA, MO, AR
82: IL, I-(WA), WI
83: IL, MI
84: IL, I-(ID)
85: US(WY)
86: I-(ID), MI, NY, IA
87: AZ, FL, SD
88: I-(IL), AZ
89: IL, I-(VT), CA, AZ, SD
90: IL, I-(SD)
91: IL, US(ID), MI
92: IL, US(FL), IA, WI
93: IL, I-(VT), IA
94: IL, I-(ND), MI
95: IL, I-(ME), US(ID), MI
96: IL, IA, I-(MI)
97: IL, US(CA)
98: IL, IA, US(AL)
99: IL, MI, CA
100: IL, WI, IA, VT
101: IL, US(CA), AZ
102: IL, ME
103: OH
104: IL, IN, OR
105: IL, OH
106: IL, IN
107: IL, MA
108: IL, CA
109: IL, IN
110: I-(MS), IA
111: IL, IN
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on January 30, 2020, 03:47:20 PM
The fact that a couple people have 1 as their answer led me to wonder about the following question:

In the continental US, what's the farthest you can get from any US or state highway number 1?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on January 30, 2020, 10:45:35 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on January 30, 2020, 03:47:20 PM
The fact that a couple people have 1 as their answer led me to wonder about the following question:

In the continental US, what's the farthest you can get from any US or state highway number 1?

Basically anywhere in Upstate NY and Vermont would be a contender. NY only has US 1, which is far away for anyone north of the Catskills.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on January 30, 2020, 11:36:49 PM
Quote from: webny99 on January 30, 2020, 10:45:35 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on January 30, 2020, 03:47:20 PM
The fact that a couple people have 1 as their answer led me to wonder about the following question:

In the continental US, what's the farthest you can get from any US or state highway number 1?

Basically anywhere in Upstate NY and Vermont would be a contender. NY only has US 1, which is far away for anyone north of the Catskills.

I think out west would have better contenders.  I'm just eyeballing, but the area around NE Nevada (like Wells, Wendover) and around Salt Lake City, Utah look to be on the order of 400 miles from any SR 1.  And of course very far from US 1 :)

California has their SR 1, and there are short ones in Idaho and Colorado, but none any closer (that I can tell anyway).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on January 31, 2020, 12:08:52 AM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 30, 2020, 11:36:49 PM
Quote from: webny99 on January 30, 2020, 10:45:35 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on January 30, 2020, 03:47:20 PM
The fact that a couple people have 1 as their answer led me to wonder about the following question:

In the continental US, what's the farthest you can get from any US or state highway number 1?

Basically anywhere in Upstate NY and Vermont would be a contender. NY only has US 1, which is far away for anyone north of the Catskills.

I think out west would have better contenders.  I'm just eyeballing, but the area around NE Nevada (like Wells, Wendover) and around Salt Lake City, Utah look to be on the order of 400 miles from any SR 1.  And of course very far from US 1 :)

California has their SR 1, and there are short ones in Idaho and Colorado, but none any closer (that I can tell anyway).

Dammit, you beat me to it. Even Idaho's SH 1 doesn't really count since it's way the hell up by Canada (Montana's is closer). Oregon has a Highway 1 (not Route) that follows I-5, while Colorado's is over in Fort Collins and NM has one in the south central part of the state along I-25. From a quick look at a map, it looks like the most distant point from those is probably somewhere in the area of Lages Junction, Nevada.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on January 31, 2020, 01:35:11 AM
Part of the UP is another contender, 400 miles from either IL 1 or M-1. But MN 1's east end is only about 200 miles if you're going straight across Lake Superior; driving distance of course would be a couple hundred added.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on January 31, 2020, 03:49:02 PM
The Purchase area of Kentucky is a long, long way from KY 1. But the Cave-in-Rock Ferry ties into IL 1, and both TN 1 (unsigned) and AR 1 are not too terribly far away.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on February 02, 2020, 06:17:04 PM
I (finally) clinched CT 194 today, so my lowest missing route number is now 288. None of those anywhere nearby, so that might last for a while...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on February 03, 2020, 08:23:59 AM
I've found a 18 relatively close to me. It is crossed by A-23 freeway, however it doesn't have a exit to it, as it is in the middle of a 11 mile gap without exits (and that is pretty long for Spanish standards). The next lowest number I haven't hit yet is 24. Spain at first didn't have any routes numbered below 100 (save for the six highways with Roman numerals, recently changed to Arabic ones), and even today is hard to find one if it's not assigned to a freeway. AFAIK, of the 90s only 91, 92 and 95 are currently in use anywhere in Spain (and formerly 90).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 03, 2020, 12:32:21 PM
CNGL:  Are you saying you drove on your route 18 and are now at 24 or that you just found the route to drive on in the future?

List updated with cl94's jump up the ranks.







oscar426
formulanone348
hbelkins298
cl94288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Rothman216
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny122
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
dlsterner53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Eth47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
ftballfan7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Great Lakes Roads on February 04, 2020, 01:53:48 AM
Looks like number 48 for me as the lowest-numbered route. Next lowest-number route would be up to 107.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Aaron Camp on February 05, 2020, 02:26:05 AM
I've never been on a route numbered 2 before, to my recollection.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 10, 2020, 01:50:25 PM
Updated.







oscar426
formulanone348
hbelkins298
cl94288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Rothman216
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny122
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
dlsterner53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
Eth47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
ftballfan7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 21, 2020, 12:25:39 PM
Mine's gone up slightly to 228.  NY 228 is just far enough away to be slightly annoying, and I believe I'll end up in cl94's shoes stuck at 288 for a while.

US1
US2
US3
I4
I5
US6
US7
MA8
US9
I10
US11
I12
US13
US14
I15
I16
US17
NY18
US19
I20
MA21
US22
US23
I24
I25
I26
US27
MA28
I29
I30
US31
MA32
MA33
NY34
I35
US36
I37
IA38
I39
I40
US41
NJ42
I43
I44
US45
IN46
MA47
US48
NY49
US50
US51
US52
US53
US54
I55
PA56
I57
US58
I59
US60
MN61
US62
NY63
I64
I65
I66
US67
I68
I69
I70
I71
CT72
I73
I74
I75
I76
I77
I78
I79
I80
I81
I82
I83
I84
I85
I86
I87
I88
I89
I90
I91
UT92
I93
I94
I95
I96
I97
US98
I99
VT100
US101
ME102
NY103
NY104
WI105
PA106
MA107
TN108
NJ109
I110
MA111
MA112
US113
KY114
I115
MA116
US117
TX118
US119
CA120
GA121
KY122
VA123
NH124
VT125
NY126
US127
MA128
US129
US130
US131
MA 132
MO133
VA134
I135
US136
ME137
RI138
TN139
I140
US141
NY142
MA143
NY144
MS145
MA146
MA147
UT148
NY149
US150
NY151
MI152
VT153
UT154
I155
NY156
NY157
US158
MA159
US160
IL161
IN162
US163
MO164
I165
NY166
US167
CA168
US169
NY170
PA171
TN172
CT173
CT174
I175
I176
CT177
CT178
CT179
I180
MA181
I182
MA183
I184
I185
ME186
MD187
CT188
I189
I190
US191
US192
MD193
I194
I195
I196
MD197
NY198
US199
MD200
MD201
US202
CA203
VA204
I205
US206
FL207
NJ208
US209
MD210
US211
MD212
CT213
ME214
I215
NY216
NY217
NY218
US219
I220
US221
US222
US223
US224
MD225
AR226
MD227
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 21, 2020, 12:26:58 PM
Updated.







oscar426
formulanone348
hbelkins298
cl94288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Rothman228
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny122
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
dlsterner53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
Eth47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
ftballfan7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on February 22, 2020, 10:30:03 AM
Updating mine to add my India travels (still haven't added 48 yet):
0: CZE D0, HUN M0, BEL R0
1: ASIA AH1, AUT A1, CHE A1, CZE D1, DEU A3, B1, ENG A1, FRA A1, HUN M1, F1, SVK D1, CAN TCH/BC 1, USA CA 1, ND 1, ORH 1
2: AUT A2, CHE A2, CZE D2, DEU B2r, ENG A2, HUN M2, F2, IND NH 2 (former, still signed), 2B (former, still signed), NLD A2, SVK D2, USA US 2, CA 2, MO 2, ORH 2
3: BEL A3, CHE A3, FRA A3, HUN F3, USA MN 3, ND 3, ORH 3
4: ENG M4, A4, FRA A4, HUN F4, ITA A4, SVK D4, USA CA 4, WA 4, ORH 4
5: AUT A4, CAN ON 5, FRA A5, N5, USA I-5, US 5, MN 5, ORH 5
6: CAN ON 6, FRA A6, N6, USA US 6, MN 6, OR 6, WA 6, ORH 6
7: CZE D7, DEU A7, HUN M7, USA US 7, MO 7, NY 7, WA 7, ORH 7
8: AUT A8, DEU A8, USA NY 8, OR 8
9: CHE A9, DEU A9, IND WB 9, USA US 9, NY 9N, ORH 9
10: HUN F10, USA I-10, US 10, OR 10, ORH 10
11: CZE D11, BEL R11, USA OR 11
12: AUT A12, BEL A12, IND NH 12, USA I-12, US 12, VT 12
13: AUT A13, CHE A13, IND WB 13, USA MN 13, WI 13
14: AUT A14, IND WB 14, USA US 14, CA 14T, WA 14, VT 14, ORH 14
15: EUR E15, USA I-15, CO 15, CT 15, MN 15, VT 15, ORH 15
16: AUT S16, USA CA 16, MN 16, WI 16, ORH 16
17: USA CO 17, NM 17, VT 17, ORH 17
18: USA US 18, CA 18, OR 18, ORH 18
19: EUR E19, HUN M19, IND NH 12, USA MN 19, OR 19
20: ENG M20, A20, BEL R20, USA I-20, US 20, MN 20, ORH 20
21: AUT A21, BEL R21, USA ID 21, MN 21, ORH 21
22: ITA A22, USA CA 22, CT 22 NY 22, OR 22, VT 22A, ORH 22
23: EUR E23, AUT A23, USA US 23, CA 23, MN 23, WI 23
24: CAN ON 24, USA US 24, CA 24, MN 24
25: EUR E25, AUT A25, BEL A25, ENG M25, USA I-25, ID 25, MN 25, ORH 25
26: FRA A26, USA US 26, MI 26, ORH 26
27: EUR E27, BEL A27, USA IA 27, MN 27, OR 27, ORH 27
28: USA MI 28
29: USA I-29, NY 29, ORH 29
30: USA US 30, MN 30, WI 30, UT 30, ORH 30
31: FRA A31, USA ORH 31
32: USA NY 32, ORH 32
33: USA CA 33, ORH 33
34: EUR E34, USA MN 34, OR 34, SD 34
35: EUR E35, CZE D35, USA OR 35, WI 35, ORH 35
36: USA CA 36, OR 36
37: USA OR 37, SD 37T, ORH 37
38: USA CA 39, MI 38, OR 38, ORH 38
39: FRA A39, USA CA 39, OR 39, ORH 39
40: EUR E40, ENG A40, USA I-40, US 40, ORH 40
41: EUR E41, USA US 41, ORH 41
42: EUR E42, USA OR 42
43: EUR E43, USA MN 43, MO 43, OR 43, ORH 43
44: EUR E44, USA I-44, US 44, CA 44, MN 44, SD 44
45: EUR E45, USA I-45, US 45, SD 45, ORH 45
46: USA OR 46, ORH 46
47: USA MN 47, OR 47, ORH 47
48: <- Lowest highway number not traveled. Closest instance: ORH 48 (US 395), John Day to Burns
49: USA I-49, US 49
50: USA US 50, MN 50, NY 50, WY 50, ORH 50
51: USA US 51, MN 51, OR 51, ORH 51
52: EUR E52, USA US 52, MO 52
53: USA US 53, OR 53, ORH 53
54: EUR E54
55: EUR E55, USA I-55, CA 55, ID 55, MI 55, MN 55
56: EUR E56, USA US 56, MN 56, WI 56
57: ITA A57, USA CA 57, MN 57
58: EUR E58, NLD A58, USA CA 58, OR 58, ORH 58
59: EUR E59, NLD A59, USA US 59, MO 59, WY 59
60: EUR E60, USA US 60, CA 60, MN 60, WI 60
61: USA US 61, ORH 61
62: EUR E62, USA US 62, MN 62, OR 62
63: USA US 63, SD 63, ORH 63
64: USA US 64, AZ 64, MI 64, MN 64, ORH 64
65: EUR E65, USA US 65, MN 65
66: USA CA 66, MO 66, OR 66, ORH 66
67: EUR E67, USA US 67, NY 67, ORH 67
68: USA MN 68, NM 68, ORH 68
69: USA I-69, US 69, ORH 69
70: EUR E70, USA I-70, US 70, ORH 70
71: EUR E71, USA US 71, CA 71
72: USA ORH 72
73: USA CA 73, MN 73
74: USA NM 74, NY 74
75: EUR E75, USA I-75, US 75
76: USA MN 76
77: USA MI 77, MN 77
78: USA WI 78
79: USA SD 79
80: USA I-80, US 80, MN 80
81: <- Runner up
82: USA OR 82, WI 82
83: FRA N83, USA US 83, CA 83
84: USA I-84, US 84, CA 84
85: USA US 85
86: FRA A86, USA MO 86
87: USA I-87, US 87, MN 87, SD 87
88: <- Third place
89: USA I-89, US 89, CA 89, SD 89
90: USA I-90, US 90, CA 90
91: CAN BC 91, USA I-91, CA 91, ORH 91
92: USA UT 92, ORH 92
93: USA US 93, ORH 93
94: USA I-94, MI 94
95: DEU A95, USA I-95, US 95, MN 95
96: DEU A96, USA US 96
97: USA US 97
98: USA US 98
99: CAN BC 99, DEU 99, USA CA 99, OR99, WA 99
100: ENG A100, USA MN 100, WA 100, VT 100, ORH 100
101: USA US 101
102: USA ORH 102
103: USA OR 103, WA 103, ORH 103
104: FRA N104, USA OR 104, WA 104, ORH 104
105: USA I-105, MN 105, WA 105, ORH 105
106: no entry
107: USA WA 107, VT 107
108: USA VT 108
109: no entry
110: USA I-110, CA 110, MN 110, WY 110, ORH 110
111: no entry
112: USA CO 112
113: USA CA 113, USA WI 113
114: IND NH 114
115: USA I-115
116: IND NH 116A
117: no entry
118: USA CA 118
119: no entry
120: USA CA 120, OR 120, WY 120, ORH 120
121-122: no entries
123: USA MI 123, ORH 123
124-125: no entries
126: USA OR 126
127-129: no entries
130: USA OR 130, WI 130, ORH 130
131: USA OR 131, WI 131, ORH 131
132-133: no entries
134: USA CA 134
135-137: no entries
138: USA OR 138, ORH 138
139: USA CA 139, MN 139
140: USA OR 140, ORH 140
141: USA OR 141, WA 141, ORH 141
142: USA CO 142, ORH 142
143: USA ORH 143
144: USA ORH 144
145: no entry
146: USA UT 146
147-148: no entries
149: USA MN 149, NY 149
150: USA ORH 150
151: USA US 151, ORH 151
152: no entry
153: USA OR 153, ORH 153
154: USA OR 154, ORH 154
155: USA ORH 155
156: no entry
157: USA ORH 157
158: no entry
159: USA CO 159
160: USA US 160, IA 160, ORH 160
161: USA WA 161, ORH 161
162: USA WI 162, ORH 162
163: USA ORH 163
164: USA OR 164, ORH 164
165: USA US 165
166: no entry
167: USA WA 167
168: no entry
169: USA US 169
170: USA CA 170
171: USA ORH 171
172: USA NV 172
173: USA CA 173, OR 173, ORH 173
174: USA ORH 174
175: USA MO 175
176-179: no entries
180: USA US 180, OR 180, ORH 180
181: no entry
182: USA I-182, OR 182, ORH 182
183: no entry
184: USA I-184
185: USA NY 185
186-188: no entries
189: USA I-189, CA 189, ORH 189
190: AUT S190, USA I-190
191: AUT S191, USA US 191, ORH 191
192: no entry
193: USA ORH 193
194: USA I-194, OR 194, ORH 194
195-196: no entries
197: USA US 197, CA 197, MN 197
198: no entry
199: USA US 199
200: USA MN 200, MT 200, OR 200, ORH 200
201: USA OR 201, ORH 201
202: USA US 202, OR 202
203: USA OR 203
204: no entry
205: USA I-205
206-209: no entry
210: USA I-210, CA 210, MN 210, OR 210, ORH 210
211: USA OR 211, ORH 211
212: USA US 212, OR 212, ORH 212
213: USA OR 213
214: USA OR 214
215: USA I-215, ORH 215
216: no entry
217: USA OR 217
218: USA US 218
219: USA OR 219
220: USA I-220
221: USA OR 221
222: USA OR 222, ORH 222
223: USA OR 223
224: USA OR 224
225: USA OR 225, ORH 225
226: USA OR 226, ORH 226
227: USA ORH 227
228: USA OR 228, ORH 228
229: USA OR 229, MTS 229, ORH 229
230: no entry
231: USA ORH 231
232: no entry
233: USA OR 233
234: no entry
235: USA I-235, ORH 235
236: USA ORH 236
237: no entry
238: USA I-238, OR 238
239: no entry
240: USA OR 240, ORH 240
241: no entry
242: USA OR 242
243: no entry
244: USA SD 244
245: USA AR 245
246: USA MN 246
247-248: no entries
249: USA MO 249
250: no entry
251: USA MN 251
252-258: no entries
259: USA CA 259
260-264: no entries
265: USA UT 265
266-269: no entries
270: USA US 270, ORH 270
271: no entry
272: USA ORH 272
273-277: no entries
278: USA I-278
279: no entry
280: USA I-280, MN 280
281: USA US 281, OR 281, ORH 281
282: USA OR 281, ORH 282
283-284: no entries
285: USA US 285
286: no entry
287: USA US 287, CT 287
288-289: no entries
290: USA I-290
291: no entry
292: USA MN 292, ORH 292
293-297: no entries
298: USA MN 298
299: USA CA 299, MN 299
300-301: no entries
302: ENG A302
303-304: no entries
305: USA I-305
306-309: no entries
310: USA US 310
311-314: no entries
315: ENG A315
316-323: no entries
324: USA NY 324
325-329: no entries
330: USA CA 330
331-340: no entries
341: USA NV 341, WY 341
342: USA NV 342
343-350: no entries
351: USA OR 351, ORH 351
352-359: no entries
360: USA ORH 360
361-367: no entries
368: USA CO 368
369: no entry
370: USA CO 370, OR 370, ORH 370
371: USA US 37, CO 371, MN 371
372-379: no entries
380: USA I-380, OR 380, ORH 380
381-384: no entries
385: USA US 385
386-390: no entries
391: FRA A391
392-393: no entries
394: USA I-394
395: USA US 395
396-400: no entries
401: CAN ON 401, ENG A401, USA WA 401
402: CAN ON 402
403: CAN ON 403
404: error highway not found
405: USA I-405
406-408: no entries
409: USA WA 409
410: USA WA 410
411: USA WA 411
412-420: no entries
421: EUR E421
422-423: no entries
424: USA ORH 424
425: no entry
426: USA ORH 426
427-431: no entries
432: USA WA 432
433: USA WA 433
434: no entry
435: USA I-435
436-441: no entries
442: EUR E442
443-450: no entries
451: USA OR 451, ORH 451
452-460: no entries
461: EUR E461
462-469: no entries
470: USA I-470
471-474: no entries
475: USA I-475
476-479: no entries
480: USA ORH 480
481: no entry
482: USA ORH 482
483: USA ORH 483
484: USA ORH 484
485: USA ORH 485
486-490: no entries
491: USA US 491
492-493: no entries
494: USA I-494
495: USA I-495
496-499: no entries
500: USA WA 500
501: USA OR 501, WA 501
502: USA WA 502
503: USA WA 503
504: USA WA 504
505: USA I-505
506-508: no entries
509: USA WA 509
510: USA I-510
511: no entry
512: USA WA 512
513-514: no entries
515: USA I-515
516: USA WA 516
517: no entry
518: USA WA 518
519: no entry
520: USA WA 520
521: no entry
522: USA NM 522
523-527: no entries
528: USA OR 528
529-532: no entries
533: EUR E533
534: no entry
535: USA I-535
536-539: no entries
540: USA I-540
541-548: no entries
549: USA AR 549
550: USA US 550
551: USA OR 551
552: EUR E552
553-568: no entries
569: USA OR 569
570-579: no entries
580: USA I-580
581-588: no entries
589: USA NV 589
590-598: no entries
599: USA NM 599, WA 599
600-604: no entries
605: USA I-605
606-609: no entries
610: USA MN 610
611-674: no entries
675: USA I-675
676-679: no entries
680: USA I-680
681-693: no entries
694: USA I-694
695-704: no entries
705: USA I-705
706-709: no entries
710: USA I-710, CA 710
711-788: no entries
789: USA WY 789
790-800: no entries
801: USA MN 801
802-879: no entries
880: USA I-880
881-894: no entries
895: USA I-895
896-899: no entries
900: USA WA 900
901-979: no entries
980: USA I-980
981-1210: no entries
1211: ENG A1211
1212-3210: no entries
3211: ENG A3211
3212: ENG A3212
3213-5200: no entries
5201: ENG A5201
5202->: no entries
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on February 27, 2020, 08:06:36 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on January 23, 2019, 08:11:19 AM
For me it's 48.  I've been on IL 21 and US 34 in Illinois, and I've hit all the other numbers from 1 to 47 in Indiana.

48 and 97 are the only numbers < 100 that I'm missing.

I finally made it to one of the sections of IN 48.  The lowest number missing from my TM file is 97, but I've driven on a couple blocks of IL 97 in Springfield, just not enough to complete an entire segment.  So my lowest number I've never been on is 107.  The closest one is OH 107, which is 160 miles away.  OH 108, another number I'm missing, is nearby.  If I do manage to get those, I'm likely to get stuck on 112 for a while, as the closest one is KY 112, 317 miles away.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ftballfan on February 29, 2020, 10:03:34 PM
My lowest is now 16 after realizing I've been on short sections of OH 7 and VA 7
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 04, 2020, 03:24:32 PM
Updated.









oscar426
formulanone348
hbelkins298
cl94288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Rothman228
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny122
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
dlsterner53
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
Eth47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 06, 2020, 10:34:18 AM
I'm up to 256 now.  As always, I've touched more routes per number on some of these, but going through that exercise to list them all would take way too long:

US1
US2
US3
I4
I5
US6
US7
MA8
US9
I10
US11
I12
US13
US14
I15
I16
US17
NY18
US19
I20
MA21
US22
US23
I24
I25
I26
US27
MA28
I29
I30
US31
MA32
MA33
NY34
I35
US36
I37
IA38
I39
I40
US41
NJ42
I43
I44
US45
IN46
MA47
US48
NY49
US50
US51
US52
US53
US54
I55
PA56
I57
US58
I59
US60
MN61
US62
NY63
I64
I65
I66
US67
I68
I69
I70
I71
CT72
I73
I74
I75
I76
I77
I78
I79
I80
I81
I82
I83
I84
I85
I86
I87
I88
I89
I90
I91
UT92
I93
I94
I95
I96
I97
US98
I99
VT100
US101
ME102
NY103
NY104
WI105
PA106
MA107
TN108
NJ109
I110
MA111
MA112
US113
KY114
I115
MA116
US117
TX118
US119
CA120
GA121
KY122
VA123
NH124
VT125
NY126
US127
MA128
US129
US130
US131
MA 132
MO133
VA134
I135
US136
ME137
RI138
TN139
I140
US141
NY142
MA143
NY144
MS145
MA146
MA147
UT148
NY149
US150
NY151
MI152
VT153
UT154
I155
NY156
NY157
US158
MA159
US160
IL161
IN162
US163
MO164
I165
NY166
US167
CA168
US169
NY170
PA171
TN172
CT173
CT174
I175
I176
CT177
CT178
CT179
I180
MA181
I182
MA183
I184
I185
ME186
MD187
CT188
I189
I190
US191
US192
MD193
I194
I195
I196
MD197
NY198
US199
MD200
MD201
US202
CA203
VA204
I205
US206
FL207
NJ208
US209
MD210
US211
MD212
CT213
ME214
I215
NY216
NY217
NY218
US219
I220
US221
US222
US223
US224
MD225
AR226
MD227
NY228
CT229
WV230
US231
VA232
ME233
VA234
I235
ME236
VA237
I238
WY239
I240
VA241
CA242
VA243
SD244
IN245
IN246
PA247
PA248
PA249
US250
NY251
NY252
NY253
TN254
I255
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 06, 2020, 10:35:44 AM
Updated.










oscar426
formulanone348
hbelkins298
cl94288
Mapmikey266
Rothman256
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny122
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
csw82
BrianP53
dlsterner53
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
Eth47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: csw on March 13, 2020, 04:01:07 PM
After driving on GA 82 earlier this week, I am now all the way up to 117...VA 117 isn't too far from me though, so that may change again soon.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 12, 2020, 04:13:08 PM










oscar426
formulanone348
hbelkins298
cl94288
Mapmikey266
Rothman256
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny122
csw117
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
BrianP53
dlsterner53
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
Eth47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on May 18, 2020, 10:44:16 PM
In case I decide to not partake in the Cincy roadmeet*, in two weeks. I did get to 122 over the weekend, and now my lowest numbered route to drive on is 125.

*The Cincy roadmeet covers Oh 125, which helps me in this game.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on May 18, 2020, 10:57:11 PM
In the interest of keeping the thread going, I've filled in a gap or two as well, as follows:

184:  NM
185:  Interstate
186:  AZ
187:  AR
188:  AZ
189, 190, 191, 192:  US

My guess is that I've been on a state route 193 in both Utah and Maryland but do not definitively remember.  Can one easily get to a football game at the University of Maryland without traveling on Maryland 193?

Filling in gaps further down the list as well, but will stick at 193 for now.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on May 19, 2020, 06:59:22 AM
I drove on Kentucky 348 last week, my new lowest-number is 357.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on May 19, 2020, 11:55:43 PM
After a couple of edits, it looks like my lowest is 106.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadrunner75 on May 20, 2020, 01:10:57 AM
Can I get away with a County route, if the only way it is signed is its shield next to the street name on a traffic signal mast arm?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ketchup99 on May 20, 2020, 12:52:48 PM
Presumably.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on May 20, 2020, 01:09:45 PM
Quote from: Roadrunner75 on May 20, 2020, 01:10:57 AM
Can I get away with a County route, if the only way it is signed is its shield next to the street name on a traffic signal mast arm?

I think even a completely unsigned (but officially designated) route would count. I'm relying on unsigned Interstates 296 and 345, and at least one unsigned 3xx Virginia state route, to push my "lowest-numbered route" into the 400s.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on May 20, 2020, 01:24:39 PM
Quote from: oscar on May 20, 2020, 01:09:45 PM
Quote from: Roadrunner75 on May 20, 2020, 01:10:57 AM
Can I get away with a County route, if the only way it is signed is its shield next to the street name on a traffic signal mast arm?

I think even a completely unsigned (but officially designated) route would count. I'm relying on unsigned Interstates 296 and 345, and at least one unsigned 3xx Virginia state route, to push my "lowest-numbered route" into the 400s.

I too will be relying on a couple unsigned VA 3xx routes once I go drive OH 266 which will make my new lowest number not driven to 428.  A bigger question for me will be whether Virginia's well-signed secondary routes will count in this should I manage to get all the 400-500 numbers.  I am not using South Carolina's secondary system, though it is mostly signed (numbers start at 1 and go into the 3000s in some counties).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on May 20, 2020, 01:32:35 PM
I counted CR 325 in Alachua County, since it's signed and was a former state road.

I can count 353 in Louisiana and probably as a Texas Loop, but I'm not too sure of the latter. (It's a headache editing that table on my phone.)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 20, 2020, 02:05:37 PM
I'm only going by signed routes and ignoring county routes and ignoring the equivalent of PA's routes that are only signed by the little white rectangles (VA does that, too, right?  I only count their circle shields).  I do count Texas' Farm or Ranch to Market Routes, though.

But, feel free to be wimps if you want. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 20, 2020, 05:03:04 PM










oscar426
formulanone357
hbelkins298
cl94288
Mapmikey266
Rothman256
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny125
csw117
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
BrianP53
dlsterner53
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
Eth47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadrunner75 on May 20, 2020, 05:55:51 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 20, 2020, 02:05:37 PM
I'm only going by signed routes and ignoring county routes and ignoring the equivalent of PA's routes that are only signed by the little white rectangles (VA does that, too, right?  I only count their circle shields).  I do count Texas' Farm or Ranch to Market Routes, though.

But, feel free to be wimps if you want. :D
I'm going to wimp out and count Monmouth County NJ Route 14.  Exhibit A:
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.259301,-74.0733911,3a,48.5y,342.7h,96.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Qv02itIkR7Ay9cy8Z0zNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.259301,-74.0733911,3a,48.5y,342.7h,96.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Qv02itIkR7Ay9cy8Z0zNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192)
I've come very close or crossed at least two state Route 14s, but not that I can recall actually drove on one.  Now I can continue onward on the count...

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on May 20, 2020, 07:15:14 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 20, 2020, 02:05:37 PM
I'm only going by signed routes and ignoring county routes and ignoring the equivalent of PA's routes that are only signed by the little white rectangles (VA does that, too, right?  I only count their circle shields).  I do count Texas' Farm or Ranch to Market Routes, though.

Virginia uses the circle and rectangle markers for secondary routes interchangeably. I've seen them both used at one intersection.

Heck, I've seen the white rectangles used for state primary and even US routes.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on May 20, 2020, 07:47:06 PM
Quote from: Roadrunner75 on May 20, 2020, 05:55:51 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 20, 2020, 02:05:37 PM
I'm only going by signed routes and ignoring county routes and ignoring the equivalent of PA's routes that are only signed by the little white rectangles (VA does that, too, right?  I only count their circle shields).  I do count Texas' Farm or Ranch to Market Routes, though.

But, feel free to be wimps if you want. :D
I'm going to wimp out and count Monmouth County NJ Route 14.  Exhibit A:
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.259301,-74.0733911,3a,48.5y,342.7h,96.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Qv02itIkR7Ay9cy8Z0zNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.259301,-74.0733911,3a,48.5y,342.7h,96.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Qv02itIkR7Ay9cy8Z0zNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192)
I've come very close or crossed at least two state Route 14s, but not that I can recall actually drove on one.  Now I can continue onward on the count...

No.
Just because your state doesn't have a "signed SR 14" does not mean you get to use a "substitute."
If you go back to page 2 of this thread, my first entry was 106. Ohio doesn't have a SR 106. Thus, I went outside of Ohio (in this case, Michigan) to go drive on (literally) one mile of M-106 to make the grade.
Go to one of your neighboring states, take in a mile of a SR 14, then move on to your next number.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on May 20, 2020, 07:56:29 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on May 20, 2020, 07:47:06 PM
Quote from: Roadrunner75 on May 20, 2020, 05:55:51 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 20, 2020, 02:05:37 PM
I'm only going by signed routes and ignoring county routes and ignoring the equivalent of PA's routes that are only signed by the little white rectangles (VA does that, too, right?  I only count their circle shields).  I do count Texas' Farm or Ranch to Market Routes, though.

But, feel free to be wimps if you want. :D
I'm going to wimp out and count Monmouth County NJ Route 14.  Exhibit A:
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.259301,-74.0733911,3a,48.5y,342.7h,96.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Qv02itIkR7Ay9cy8Z0zNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.259301,-74.0733911,3a,48.5y,342.7h,96.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Qv02itIkR7Ay9cy8Z0zNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192)
I've come very close or crossed at least two state Route 14s, but not that I can recall actually drove on one.  Now I can continue onward on the count...

No.
Just because your state doesn't have a "signed SR 14" does not mean you get to use a "substitute."
If you go back to page 2 of this thread, my first entry was 106. Ohio doesn't have a SR 106. Thus, I went outside of Ohio (in this case, Michigan) to go drive on (literally) one mile of M-106 to make the grade.
Go to one of your neighboring states, take in a mile of a SR 14, then move on to your next number.

I've definitely driven on 106th Street, but I'm not counting it. :)  Looks like I have to drive to New Mexico.  I already have a 107, so I'll jump up the list!

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on May 20, 2020, 09:45:10 PM
For posterity...A route of every number under 112 that I've traveled.  There isn't even a 112 anywhere near me...

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49918340067_48e0560c9a_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2j47xnD)
img20200520_20412050 (https://flic.kr/p/2j47xnD) by Paul Drives (https://www.flickr.com/photos/138603251@N02/), on Flickr
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadrunner75 on May 20, 2020, 10:55:08 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on May 20, 2020, 07:47:06 PM
Quote from: Roadrunner75 on May 20, 2020, 05:55:51 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 20, 2020, 02:05:37 PM
I'm only going by signed routes and ignoring county routes and ignoring the equivalent of PA's routes that are only signed by the little white rectangles (VA does that, too, right?  I only count their circle shields).  I do count Texas' Farm or Ranch to Market Routes, though.

But, feel free to be wimps if you want. :D
I'm going to wimp out and count Monmouth County NJ Route 14.  Exhibit A:
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.259301,-74.0733911,3a,48.5y,342.7h,96.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Qv02itIkR7Ay9cy8Z0zNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.259301,-74.0733911,3a,48.5y,342.7h,96.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Qv02itIkR7Ay9cy8Z0zNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192)
I've come very close or crossed at least two state Route 14s, but not that I can recall actually drove on one.  Now I can continue onward on the count...

No.
Just because your state doesn't have a "signed SR 14" does not mean you get to use a "substitute."
If you go back to page 2 of this thread, my first entry was 106. Ohio doesn't have a SR 106. Thus, I went outside of Ohio (in this case, Michigan) to go drive on (literally) one mile of M-106 to make the grade.
Go to one of your neighboring states, take in a mile of a SR 14, then move on to your next number.
Our governor announced today that due to the current stay at home order in effect, county routes can be counted as routes driven until further notice.  Once the order is lifted, I would request that somebody help me find something fun to do near Milford DE to sell to the wife and kid so that I can pick up DE 14.

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadgeekteen on May 20, 2020, 11:09:53 PM
Quote from: Roadrunner75 on May 20, 2020, 10:55:08 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on May 20, 2020, 07:47:06 PM
Quote from: Roadrunner75 on May 20, 2020, 05:55:51 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 20, 2020, 02:05:37 PM
I'm only going by signed routes and ignoring county routes and ignoring the equivalent of PA's routes that are only signed by the little white rectangles (VA does that, too, right?  I only count their circle shields).  I do count Texas' Farm or Ranch to Market Routes, though.

But, feel free to be wimps if you want. :D
I'm going to wimp out and count Monmouth County NJ Route 14.  Exhibit A:
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.259301,-74.0733911,3a,48.5y,342.7h,96.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Qv02itIkR7Ay9cy8Z0zNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 (https://www.google.com/maps/@40.259301,-74.0733911,3a,48.5y,342.7h,96.95t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1Qv02itIkR7Ay9cy8Z0zNg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192)
I've come very close or crossed at least two state Route 14s, but not that I can recall actually drove on one.  Now I can continue onward on the count...

No.
Just because your state doesn't have a "signed SR 14" does not mean you get to use a "substitute."
If you go back to page 2 of this thread, my first entry was 106. Ohio doesn't have a SR 106. Thus, I went outside of Ohio (in this case, Michigan) to go drive on (literally) one mile of M-106 to make the grade.
Go to one of your neighboring states, take in a mile of a SR 14, then move on to your next number.
Our governor announced today that due to the current stay at home order in effect, county routes can be counted as routes driven until further notice.  Once the order is lifted, I would request that somebody help me find something fun to do near Milford DE to sell to the wife and kid so that I can pick up DE 14.
Does Phil Murphy know roadgeek lingo and culture?  :bigass:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on May 21, 2020, 06:50:41 AM
Quote from: hbelkins on May 20, 2020, 07:15:14 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 20, 2020, 02:05:37 PM
I'm only going by signed routes and ignoring county routes and ignoring the equivalent of PA's routes that are only signed by the little white rectangles (VA does that, too, right?  I only count their circle shields).  I do count Texas' Farm or Ranch to Market Routes, though.

Virginia uses the circle and rectangle markers for secondary routes interchangeably. I've seen them both used at one intersection.

Heck, I've seen the white rectangles used for state primary and even US routes.

There is even one for an interstate...

(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vahighways.com%2Ferrors%2F77inrectangle.jpg&hash=3c3793a837149f35752034ece16a04030458afa7)
Near Fancy Gap, 2007
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on May 21, 2020, 07:28:02 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on May 20, 2020, 09:45:10 PM
For posterity...A route of every number under 112 that I've traveled.  There isn't even a 112 anywhere near me...

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49918340067_48e0560c9a_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2j47xnD)
img20200520_20412050 (https://flic.kr/p/2j47xnD) by Paul Drives (https://www.flickr.com/photos/138603251@N02/), on Flickr

Heh, good work.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: csw on May 21, 2020, 10:18:51 PM
I drove most of VA 117 a few weeks ago, so now my new number is 132. I've crossed both IL 132 and OH 132, but that's as close as I've come.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ketchup99 on May 22, 2020, 08:02:05 PM
US-1
OH-2
NJ-3
M4 (England)
PA-5
US-6
US-7
CT-8
US-9
RI-10
US-11
I think 12 is the lowest I haven't been on, but it's kind of a pain for me to get that one... the closest one is near Reading...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadrunner75 on May 23, 2020, 02:03:38 AM
Quote from: Ketchup99 on May 22, 2020, 08:02:05 PM
I think 12 is the lowest I haven't been on, but it's kind of a pain for me to get that one... the closest one is near Reading...

I like that 12.  It's a freeway to nowhere.  Ironically the outer freeway loop (now 222) was the one called by locals the "Road to Nowhere" for years but has since been completed and is a busy bypass of the city.  Route 12's eastbound control city is Pricetown, a tiny village that's really just a rural crossroads.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: milbfan on May 24, 2020, 03:13:09 AM
47, then 84

US 1 - SC/GA/MD
GA 2
GA 3 (US 41)
I-4
I-5 - CA/WA
US 6 - Omaha/Council Bluffs
AL 7 (US 11)
AL 8 (US 80)
AL 9 (around Montgomery)
I-10 - TX/LA/MS/AL/FL
US 11 - MS/AL/GA/TN/VA
I-12, Also: MS 12, Starkville and Columbus
AL 13 (US 43)
AL 14 (Prattville, Auburn)
US 15 - NC/VA
I-16
US 17 - GA/SC/NC/VA
KY 18 - near Florence Mall
US 19 - FL/GA/NC/TN/VA/WV
I-20 - TX/LA/MS/AL/GA/SC
US 21 - VA
AL 22 (Clanton w/ US 31)
US 23 - GA/NC/TN/VA/KY
I-24 - TN/KY
US 25 - GA/TN/NC/KY
I-26 - TN/NC/SC
US 27 - TN/KY/OH, also: I-27
AL 28 - Livingston
US 29 - AL/GA/NC/VA
I-30 - TX/AR
US 31 - AL/IN, also: TX 31
TN 32 - US 25E, at I-81 to the state line
US 33 - Harrisonburg, VA
TX 34 - Terrell-area
I-35 - TX/OK/KS
US 36 - CO - Boulder/Estes Park
I-37, also IN 37, south of I-69 to Paoli
TN 38
TN 39 - Madisonville/Etowah (US 411 overlap)
I-40 - TX/AR/TN/NC
US 41 - GA/TN/KY/IN
US 42 - KY (Louisville, overlap with 127 over near Florence), OH
MS 43
I-44 - Wichita Falls
I-45, also: US 45 in MS/TN
IN 46 - Bloomington to I-65

Got bored, decided to continue to the next one:

VA 48 - unsigned/The Blue Ridge Parkway
I-49 - Shreveport, LA
US 50 - Cincy/Vincennes, IN
AL 51 - Opelika area
US 52 - NC/VA/WV/OH
AL 53 - US 231, also GA 53 - Rome to I-75
NC 54
I-55 - MS/TN/AR/MO
IN 56 - French Link/Scottsburg/Hanover/Madison
I-57 - IL/MO
US 58 - TN/VA, also TN 58
I-59 - MS/AL/GA
US 60 - KY (Lexington, Louisville, Winchester), also TN 60
US 61 - Memphis, also GA 61
US 62 - KY (Bardstown, Midway, Georgetown)
US 63 - LA (Ruston), also: TN 63
US 64 - TN/NC, also: I-64 - IL/IN/KY/WV/VA
I-65 - AL/TN/KY/IN
I-66 - VA/DC
AL 67
US 68 - Lexington, KY
US 69 - TX - Tyler to Greenville, also: I-69 in Bloomington, IN
US 70 - AR/TN/NC, also: I-70: CO/KS, IL/IN
I-71 - KY/OH, also: GA 71
US 72 - AL/TN, also: KY 72
I-73 - NC
I-74 - NC/OH
I-75 - FL/GA/TN/KY/OH, also: US 75 in TX, NE
US 76 - GA
I-77 - SC/NC/VA/WV
US 78 - GA/SC
US 79 - LA
US 80 - TX/LA/MS/AL/GA, also: I-80: NE/IA
US 81 - TX, also: I-81 - TN/VA
US 82 - TX, MS/AL/GA
VA 83

I-85 - AL/GA/SC/NC

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 25, 2020, 01:17:54 AM
Updated:











oscar426
formulanone357
hbelkins298
cl94288
Mapmikey266
Rothman256
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
csw132
Hot Rod Hootenanny125
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
BrianP53
dlsterner53
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
Eth47
milbfan47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Eth on May 25, 2020, 10:57:09 AM
Finally I get to update mine: yesterday I drove segments of GA 47 and GA 57 (for now, at least, though I expect this segment of the latter will soon go away in favor of 540), so my new lowest route number not traveled is 63.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on May 26, 2020, 03:24:14 PM
For posterity, writing down my "proof".

1: US, CA, CO, FL, GA, ND
2: US, CO, MD, MO
3: GA, IL, MA, MN, ND, OK
4: I, US, KS, OH
5: I, CO, FL, GA, KS, MN, MO
6: US, ID, MN, OK, OR, TX
7: US, CO, GA, KS, MO, OR, UT
8: I, US, CO, ID, LA
9: CO, CT, FL, IN, ME, MO, NH, OK, OR, SC, UT
10: I, US, AL, CO, FL, IL, KS, NE, NH, OK, OR, WY
11: I, US, CO, NH, OK, OR, WI, WY
12: I, US, AR, CA, CO, IA, UT
13: CO, FL, MN, MO, UT
14: US, AL, AR, CO, KS
15: I, US, CO, KS, MN, MO
16: I, US, AR, CO, FL, MN, NH
17: I, US, CA, CO, CT, MO, NJ, NY, UT, WA
18: US, AR, CA, KS, MN, UT
19: I, US, MN, MO, NE, UT
20: I, US, FL, KS, MN, WA
21: US, AL, CO, FL, GA, MN
22: I, US, CA, CO, MN, MO, ND, WY
23: US, CA, MN
24: I, US, FL
25: I, US, GA, ID, KS, MN, NE, WI
26: I, US, CO, FL, GA, NM, PA
27: I, US, AL, ID, IA, KS, MN, NE
28: ID, LA, MT, UT
29: I, CA, IL, WI
30: I, US, CO, GA, OK, UT
31: US, KS
32: ID, KS, MO
33: ID, MN
34: US, ID, MO, OK, SC, SD, TX, UT
35: I, US, CO, OR, TX, WI
36: US, CO, MN
37: I, IN, MI, MO, OK, OR, SD
38: GA, IA, MN,
39: I, CO, ID, MO
40: I, US, CO, FL
41: I, US, MT
42: CO, SD
43: I, MI, MN, MO, UT
44: I, CO, ID, SD, UT
45: I, US, CO, GA, LA, MO, SD
46: CO
47: CO, ID, LA, MN, MT, OR
48: MN
49: I, US, CA, OH
50: US, ID, MI, MN, SD, WY
51: US, ID, MN, OK
52: US, AL, CO, KS, MO, NY
53: US, CO, NE, OK
54: US, TX
55: I, CO, ID, MN
56: US, IL, MN
57: I, CO, IN, KS
58: CO, MN, UT
59: I, US, CO, MO, MT, UT, WY
60: US, CO, MN, TX
61: US, AZ, CO, KY
62: US, CO, IN, MN
63: US, CO, KS, MI, SD, TN, UT
64: I, US, CO
65: I, US, WI
66: I, CO, MO, OK
67: US, AZ, CO, IN, NE
68: CA
69: I, US, AL, CO
70: I, US, TX, WY
71: I, US, CO, NE, TX
72: I, CO, MO
73: I, US, MN, NC, SD
74: I, US, AR, CO, MN, MO
75: I, US, CO
76: I, US, MO
77: I, US, AZ, AR, MN, MO
78: I, US, CO, ID, MT
79: I, US, CO, SD
80: I, US, AZ
81: I, US
82: I, US, AZ, CO
83: I, US, CO, MO
84: I, US, CA
85: I, US
86: I, AZ, CO, MO
87: I, US, AZ, MN, MO
88: I, CO, TN
89: I, US, AZ, CA, WY
90: I, US, AZ, GA, MO
91: I, US, CO
92: US, IL, KS
93: I, US, CO, MN
94: I, MO
95: I, US, CO, MN, TX, WY
96: I, CO, KS, MI, MO
97: I, US, MN
98: US
99: I, AZ, CA, GA, MN, OR, UT, WA
100: FL, MN, MO, VA
101: US, MN
102: FL, UT
103: CO
104: FL, IL
105: I, CO, FL, MN, MO
106: None

Also below 150 I'm missing 108, 111, 132, 136, 137, 140, 146, 147, and 148.

Between 1 and 3134 (my highest numbered route), I have traveled on 341 different numbers.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on June 03, 2020, 10:19:19 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on May 18, 2020, 10:44:16 PM
In case I decide to not partake in the Cincy roadmeet*, in two weeks. I did get to 122 over the weekend, and now my lowest numbered route to drive on is 125.

*The Cincy roadmeet covers Oh 125, which helps me in this game.

I did attend the Cincy Roadmeet, drove on Oh 125, and now have to locate an 143 next.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 11, 2020, 06:34:27 PM
Very belatedly updated:











oscar426
formulanone357
hbelkins298
cl94288
Mapmikey266
Rothman256
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny143
csw132
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
dlsterner53
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on July 11, 2020, 07:11:36 PM
It looks like it is 47 for me.  I have crossed the south end of VA 47 in South Hill, and have been near the north end of VA 47 (signed from US 460 at the west end of the Pamplin City Bypass).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadrunner75 on July 12, 2020, 03:51:58 AM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on July 11, 2020, 07:11:36 PM
It looks like it is 47 for me.  I have crossed the south end of VA 47 in South Hill, and have been near the north end of VA 47 (signed from US 460 at the west end of the Pamplin City Bypass).
You have one so close - right across the Walt Whitman from Philadelphia.  You can use it to go to the beach this summer.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 12, 2020, 03:49:30 PM
Updated.











oscar426
formulanone357
hbelkins298
cl94288
Mapmikey266
Rothman256
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny143
csw132
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
dlsterner53
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Takumi on July 13, 2020, 01:19:19 AM
9, I'm pretty sure.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 18, 2020, 11:51:01 PM
Updated.  Already had Takumi at 9 and I moved up to 288 (as I predicted.  Might be stuck here for a bit).












oscar426
formulanone357
hbelkins298
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny143
csw132
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
dlsterner53
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 18, 2020, 11:52:09 PM
Samples of my 287 routes.  I don't even attempt to keep track of all the duplicates.  For the purposes of this thread, touching one is enough.

US   1
US   2
US   3
I   4
I   5
US   6
US   7
MA   8
US   9
I   10
US   11
I   12
US   13
US   14
I   15
I   16
US   17
NY   18
US   19
I   20
MA   21
US   22
US   23
I   24
I   25
I   26
US   27
MA   28
I   29
I   30
US   31
MA   32
MA   33
NY   34
I   35
US   36
I   37
IA   38
I   39
I   40
US   41
NJ   42
I   43
I   44
US   45
IN   46
MA   47
US   48
NY   49
US   50
US   51
US   52
US   53
US   54
I   55
PA   56
I   57
US   58
I   59
US   60
MN   61
US   62
NY   63
I   64
I   65
I   66
US   67
I   68
I   69
I   70
I   71
CT   72
I   73
I   74
I   75
I   76
I   77
I   78
I   79
I   80
I   81
I   82
I   83
I   84
I   85
I   86
I   87
I   88
I   89
I   90
I   91
UT   92
I   93
I   94
I   95
I   96
I   97
US   98
I   99
VT   100
US   101
ME   102
NY   103
NY   104
WI   105
PA   106
MA   107
TN   108
NJ   109
I   110
MA   111
MA   112
US   113
KY   114
I   115
MA   116
US   117
TX   118
US   119
CA   120
GA   121
KY   122
VA   123
NH   124
VT   125
NY   126
US   127
MA   128
US   129
US   130
US   131
MA    132
MO   133
VA   134
I   135
US   136
ME   137
RI   138
TN   139
I   140
US   141
NY   142
MA   143
NY   144
MS   145
MA   146
MA   147
UT   148
NY   149
US   150
NY   151
MI   152
VT   153
UT   154
I   155
NY   156
NY   157
US   158
MA   159
US   160
IL   161
IN   162
US   163
MO   164
I   165
NY   166
US   167
CA   168
US   169
NY   170
PA   171
TN   172
CT   173
CT   174
I   175
I   176
CT   177
CT   178
CT   179
I   180
MA   181
I   182
MA   183
I   184
I   185
ME   186
MD   187
CT   188
I   189
I   190
US   191
US   192
MD   193
I   194
I   195
I   196
MD   197
NY   198
US   199
MD   200
MD   201
US   202
CA   203
VA   204
I   205
US   206
FL   207
NJ   208
US   209
MD   210
US   211
MD   212
CT   213
ME   214
I   215
NY   216
NY   217
NY   218
US   219
I   220
US   221
US   222
US   223
US   224
MD   225
AR   226
MD   227
NY   228
CT   229
WV   230
US   231
VA   232
ME   233
VA   234
I   235
ME   236
VA   237
I   238
WY   239
I   240
VA   241
CA   242
VA   243
SD   244
IN   245
IN   246
PA   247
PA   248
PA   249
US   250
NY   251
NY   252
NY   253
TN   254
I   255
NY   256
NY   257
US   258
US   259
NY   260
NY   261
UT   262
NY   263
I   264
I   265
NY   266
VA   267
TN   268
UT   269
I   270
I   271
CT   272
DE   273
NY   274
I   275
I   276
I   277
I   278
I   279
I   280
US   281
NY   282
I   283
TN   284
US   285
VA   286
I   287
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on July 19, 2020, 12:01:47 AM
Are we including county routes in this tally? Because I HAVE driven a county route 288 (Gunnville Road in Erie County, NY). Such would bring me up to 323, which from what I can tell, does not exist in any way, shape, or form in the Northeast US.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on July 19, 2020, 06:26:47 AM
County routes count.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 19, 2020, 11:52:18 AM
Quote from: 1 on July 19, 2020, 06:26:47 AM
County routes count.
I don't count 'em.  They're silly.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on July 19, 2020, 11:56:52 AM
I don't keep track of county routes, but you can count them if you want. Some of this is because some county routes function as minor state routes, such as New Jersey's 500 series and Florida's in-grid county routes that have been downgraded from state routes.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on July 19, 2020, 12:41:57 PM
Quote from: cl94 on July 19, 2020, 12:01:47 AM
Are we including county routes in this tally? Because I HAVE driven a county route 288 (Gunnville Road in Erie County, NY). Such would bring me up to 323, which from what I can tell, does not exist in any way, shape, or form in the Northeast US.

There is a VA 323 (http://www.vahighways.com/route-log/va321-340.htm), which is for the Piedmont Geriatic Hospital, in Burkeville, VA.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 19, 2020, 12:48:53 PM
Quote from: 1 on July 19, 2020, 11:56:52 AM
I don't keep track of county routes, but you can count them if you want. Some of this is because some county routes function as minor state routes, such as New Jersey's 500 series and Florida's in-grid county routes that have been downgraded from state routes.
They're still silly.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 19, 2020, 11:08:36 PM
My levity aside, you counting that county route, cl94?

Is it unsigned?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on July 19, 2020, 11:56:49 PM
In the world of route numbers that DO count, I drove on a 1/2 mile of OH 143 on Saturday. I'm on to locate an 145 now.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: KEK Inc. on July 21, 2020, 05:40:08 PM
I don't think I've been on a hwy 21.  Although technically I-680 used to be CA-21.


CA-1, US-1 (in MA, DC and NY)
CA-2, US-2 (WA, ID)
CA-3, WA-3
CA-4, WA-4
I-5 (CA, OR, WA)
OR-6, WA-6
WA-7
I-8 (CA), OR-8
CA-9, WA-9, NY-9a
I-10 (CA, LA), WA-10, OR-10
WA-11, I-11 (AZ, NV)
US-12 (WA, ID, MT), CA-12
CA-13
US-14 (WY), CA-14, WA-14
I-15 (CA, NV, UT, ID, MT), CA-15
WA-16
CA-17, WA-17
WA-18
WA-19
US-20 (OR, ID, WY), CA-20, WA-20


iPhone
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Max Rockatansky on July 21, 2020, 05:51:49 PM
Quote from: KEK Inc. on July 21, 2020, 05:40:08 PM
I don't think I've been on a hwy 21.  Although technically I-680 used to be CA-21.


CA-1, US-1 (in MA, DC and NY)
CA-2, US-2 (WA, ID)
CA-3, WA-3
CA-4, WA-4
I-5 (CA, OR, WA)
OR-6, WA-6
WA-7
I-8 (CA), OR-8
CA-9, WA-9, NY-9a
I-10 (CA, LA), WA-10, OR-10
WA-11, I-11 (AZ, NV)
US-12 (WA, ID, MT), CA-12
CA-13
US-14 (WY), CA-14, WA-14
I-15 (CA, NV, UT, ID, MT), CA-15
WA-16
CA-17, WA-17
WA-18
WA-19
US-20 (OR, ID, WY), CA-20, WA-20


iPhone

WA 104 was once PSH 21 and WA 303 was SSH 21B if you're ever been out to Kitsap. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on July 21, 2020, 10:56:49 PM
Quote from: KEK Inc. on July 21, 2020, 05:40:08 PM
I don't think I've been on a hwy 21.  Although technically I-680 used to be CA-21.

Everybody gets to make their own ground rules, of course ... but did you ever drive I-680 while it was signed as CA 21?  If so, IMHO I would consider the number 21 obtained.

I have a similar case ... A portion of I-195 in Maryland used to be designated as MD 46.  But since I have driven on it while it was designated as MD 46, in my view it counts (I don't think I have any other 46).  Nobody can take away from me the fact that I have driven on a "Route 46".

Note that I count the number(s) on the road when I drove on it - so historical designations before my time - or future designations for that matter - would not count.

For that reason, I have to be a bit careful when using my "Travel Mapping" log file, since it uses the current designation.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on July 22, 2020, 07:03:22 AM
I'd count it; I counted FL 325 which was later demoted, and I-345, which isn't even signed.

Edit: found that I'd been a segment of Texas Spur 345 in San Antonio.

Also, my new highest is 369, after scooping up TN 357 last month.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 22, 2020, 11:05:37 AM
You are all a bunch of dirty cheaters.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on July 22, 2020, 11:16:14 AM
I was told by my parents they took me on then A-16 in Catalonia when I was 2 and thus I claim that as my 16 even if I don't remember it, that road is now part of C-32. OTOH, I didn't get onto A-18 before it was changed to C-16, and thus 18 remains my lowest number I still have to travel, and to further complicate things there are no major highways in Spain with that number, the only route with that number I've located is a local road in Teruel province which happens to be not far from A-23. If I get to that road (which won't happen anytime soon unfortunately...) then my new lowest untraveled number will be 24.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 23, 2020, 02:41:02 PM
Updated. Didn't update cl94 since he hasn't said if he really wants to count his county route (which may be unsigned :D).











oscar426
formulanone369
hbelkins298
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
corco144
Hot Rod Hootenanny143
csw132
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
dlsterner53
Jim48
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
US 8946
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on July 24, 2020, 01:28:46 PM
Quote from: Rothman on July 22, 2020, 11:05:37 AM
You are all a bunch of dirty cheaters.

Don't look at me!  :)  All my routes are signed and at least at the state level.  And I have driven ON THEM.
I'm going to clinch WI-112 next month, so my new number will be 153...until I take my trip around the Michigan Thumb and Detroit area which may happen this fall.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on July 24, 2020, 08:08:42 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on July 19, 2020, 11:56:49 PM
In the world of route numbers that DO count, I drove on a 1/2 mile of OH 143 on Saturday. I'm on to locate an 145 now.
bump...just to remind Rothman.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on July 25, 2020, 09:47:30 AM
Since I reported my list 18 months ago, I have been on routes with the two lowest numbers I was previously missing by traveling NY 48 and MA 135.  My new answer is 139.

I'll also renew the offer to run a report for any TM user who's interested in seeing which numbers they have traveled and are missing based on .list files.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Thing 342 on July 25, 2020, 10:53:39 AM
Added MD-103 and MD-108 recently, now my new lowest is 127.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: noelbotevera on July 25, 2020, 05:39:22 PM
Still have 43 untraveled (and I'm not on the list?), since the 43's closest to me are (a) too far away (PA/WV 43, NY 43) or (b) out of the way/no point in traveling them (MD 43). Other than that I think my next lowest is 92.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 25, 2020, 07:58:45 PM
Think I caught everything.












oscar426
formulanone369
hbelkins298
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
paulthemapguy112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
dlsterner53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
US 8946
noelbotevera43
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on August 18, 2020, 10:35:09 PM
Took a mini road trip, and picked up not only MD 53, but a few more that I didn't have.

My lowest-numbered route that I haven't been on is now up to 125.

There is MD 125 in my state, but it is kind of in an area I never get to, and it is an odd-ball route that actually doesn't connect to any other numbered road.  So it likely requires a special trip.

I also have yet to get 126 and 128, as well as several in the 130's.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on August 19, 2020, 10:13:47 AM
I got Georgia 369 (and an SR 325) last week, so my lowest number is now 379.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on August 20, 2020, 11:53:23 AM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on February 03, 2020, 08:23:59 AM
I've found a 18 relatively close to me. It is crossed by A-23 freeway, however it doesn't have a exit to it, as it is in the middle of a 11 mile gap without exits (and that is pretty long for Spanish standards). The next lowest number I haven't hit yet is 24.

Scratch that, I may haven't been on a road numbered 24 in Spain but I just found I traveled on D24 in the French department no. 64 (Pyrenees-Atlantiques) some years ago. After 18, the next lowest number I haven't hit yet is 26, and I have a relatively major highway close to me with that number. I still have to hit a 16 as far as my memory goes (and also that currently exists), I only count that as traveled as I have been told so.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on August 20, 2020, 12:38:34 PM
Drove on WI-112...didn't get to clinch it due to a bridge being out.  My new number is 153, though I might be driving MI-153 this fall.

edit:  added list for posterity
(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50249264948_94a1ac6357_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2jymBP3)
img20200820_20240568 (https://flic.kr/p/2jymBP3) by Paul Drives (https://www.flickr.com/photos/138603251@N02/), on Flickr
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 23, 2020, 10:45:51 AM
Updated.

CNGL, I can't decipher your last post.  Just say what number you want to use.














oscar426
formulanone379
hbelkins298
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
US 8946
noelbotevera43
ipeters6135
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ketchup99 on August 23, 2020, 01:44:51 PM
From what I can decipher I think CNGL is at 18? But I'm not sure.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 23, 2020, 10:34:36 PM
Quote from: Ketchup99 on August 23, 2020, 01:44:51 PM
From what I can decipher I think CNGL is at 18? But I'm not sure.
Protip: Let him speak for himself.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on August 24, 2020, 06:33:30 PM
It's still 18. Once I tackle that (the closest 18 to me is D18 in the department no. 64, Pyrenees-Atlantiques, in France; although not the most readily accesible to me), it will be 26 and not 24 as I previously thought and explained in that post.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on August 24, 2020, 07:45:46 PM
Quote from: 1 on July 19, 2020, 11:56:52 AM
I don't keep track of county routes, but you can count them if you want. Some of this is because some county routes function as minor state routes, such as New Jersey's 500 series and Florida's in-grid county routes that have been downgraded from state routes.
I count Oregon's underlying Highway system. One of these days I need to hit up ORH 48 (US 395 between US 20 and 26).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Thunderbyrd316 on August 24, 2020, 09:13:41 PM
   Just doing this off the top of my head. I am sure I am going to miss quite a few.

   BC 3, California 1, Montana 1, Manatoba 3
   California 2, US 2
   California 3, Washington 3
   California 4, Washington 4
   Interstate 5
   Washington 6, US 6
   BC 7, California 7, Washington 7
   Interstate 8
   California 9, Washington 9
   BC 10, Interstate 10, Kansas 10, Oregon 10, US 10
   BC 11, California 11, Oregon 11
   California 12, US 12
   California 13
   California 14, Washington 14
   California 15, Interstate 15
   California 16, Washington 16
   California 17, Interstate 17, Washington 17
   Oregon 18, Saskatchewan 18, Washington 18
   Oregon 19
   California 20, US 20, Washington 20
   Colorado 21 (Note that the segment of Powers Boulevard that I drove in 1999 appears not to have been signed as Colorado 21 at the time. There is a good chance that I was on California 21 when it existed but I was too young to clearly remember it. I have crossed Idaho 21 but did not get off the freeway there. I have crossed Washington 21 on three different highways but again never got on it.) Santa Clara County G21 (Capitol Expressway), Nebraska 21 (Segment concurrent with I-80)
   California 22, Oregon 22, Washington 22
   California 23
   California 24
   Interstate 25
   US 26, Washington 26
   Washington 27
   Washington 28
   Interstate 29
   US 30
   I will have to continue this later...

   Update: Well it looks like I picked the perfect place to end this the first time as I am unable to find a single example of ANY route 31 that I have been on. Therefore my answer must be 31.
   
   
   
   
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 24, 2020, 10:36:17 PM
Quote from: Bickendan on August 24, 2020, 07:45:46 PM
Quote from: 1 on July 19, 2020, 11:56:52 AM
I don't keep track of county routes, but you can count them if you want. Some of this is because some county routes function as minor state routes, such as New Jersey's 500 series and Florida's in-grid county routes that have been downgraded from state routes.
I count Oregon's underlying Highway system. One of these days I need to hit up ORH 48 (US 395 between US 20 and 26).
Meh. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: noelbotevera on August 28, 2020, 01:44:36 PM
Finally, finally traveled a 43. Funnily enough it isn't the one closest to me (MD 43 near Baltimore) but rather NY-MA 43 in the Berkshires. Picked it up on a trip to Bennington, VT, three weeks ago.

That brings my lowest to...47. I have traveled former NY 47 as I-590, but I guess we're not counting that. The closest 47 is MD 47 west of Cumberland, MD.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SoDakInterstateEnthusiast on August 28, 2020, 02:30:57 PM
SD-13.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 28, 2020, 06:01:35 PM
Belatedly updated.














oscar426
formulanone379
hbelkins298
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
deathtopumpkins92
7/888
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ftballfan on August 29, 2020, 11:52:33 AM
I've been on the following (below 100):
1: US-, MI-
2: OH-
3: MI-
4: I-, OH-
5: MI-
6: US-, MI-
7: OH-, VA-
8: MI-
9: IN-, WV-
10: US-, MI-
11: US-, MI-
12: US-, OH-
13: MI-, OH-
14: MI-
15: OH-
16: NONE (have driven significant parts of former US-16 in Michigan, closest active 16 is in Indiana)
17: US-, MI-
18: MI-, OH-
19: US-, OH-
20: US-, MI-
21: MI-, OH-
22: MI-
23: US-
24: I-, US-
25: MI-, OH-
26: NONE (closest 26 is in Indiana and M-26 is in the western UP)
27: US-
28: NONE (I've crossed M-28 but have never been on it)
29: WI-
30: US-
31: US-
32: MI-
33: US-
34: MI-
35: US-
36: US-, MI-
37: IN-, MI-
38: IN-
39: MI-
40: I-, US-, MI-
41: I-, US-
42: US-, MI-
43: I-, MI-
44: MI-
45: US-, MI-
46: MI-
47: IL-, OH-
48: NONE (I've crossed M-48 but have never been on it)
49: MI-, OH-
50: US-, FL-, IL-, MI-
51: US-, OH-, TN-
52: US-, MI-, TN-
53: MI-, OH-
54: MI-
55: I-, MI-
56: IL-
57: MI-
58: NONE (I've been close to M-58 several times)
59: MI-
60: MI-, OH-
61: MI-
62: MI-
63: KY-, MI-
64: I-, US-
65: I-, OH-
66: I-, MI-
67: IN-, OH-
68: US-
69: I-
70: I-
71: I-, MI-
72: MI-
73: NONE (M-73 is in the western UP, but I've driven on multiple sections of what was planned to be I-73 in MI and OH)
74: I-
75: I-
76: I-
77: I-
78: MI-
79: MI-
80: I-
81: I-
82: MI-
83: IL-, MI-
84: NONE (I've crossed M-84 but have never been on it)
85: I-
86: MI-
87: NONE (closest might be in OH or IL; neither MI nor IN have a state route 87)
88: I-
89: MI-
90: I-, KY-
91: MI-
92: US-
93: MI-
94: I-
95: I-
96: I-, OH-
97: NONE (I've crossed M-97 but have never been on it)
98: US-
99: MI-

So the only ones I'm missing below 100 are 16, 26, 28, 48, 58, 73, 84, 87, and 97 (and I'm not particularly close to any routes with those numbers)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 29, 2020, 02:56:16 PM
So...16, right?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ftballfan on August 29, 2020, 03:44:11 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 29, 2020, 02:56:16 PM
So...16, right?
Correct. I've crossed IN-16 and GA-16 a few times, but I've never been on either.

I MAY have been on a very short stretch of OH-16 in downtown Columbus (which is part of a redundant concurrency) as I had to take an eligibility test for a job opening for the City of Columbus last year.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: deathtopumpkins on August 31, 2020, 02:22:12 PM
So apparently on a trip to WV back in July I drove on a few miles of WV 92, which means I've now been on everything under 100.

It appears my new lowest number is 157. Coincidentally I'll be picking up AL 157 in a few weeks thanks to its concurrency with US 72 Alt in Muscle Shoals, which will make my lowest number 188.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: I-55 on August 31, 2020, 11:39:27 PM
Right now it looks like the lowest for me is 86, though at one point before I joined this forum I read this thread and remember finding myself somewhere in the 110s, though I don't have the writing to reference now. I'll keep looking for an 86 I've been on, as well as whatever lies beyond it.

IN-1 (multiple places)
WV-2 (mostly Henderson-WV-193)
IN-3 (multiple places)
I-4 (Orlando)
AL-5 (multiple places)
US-6 (multiple places)
OH-7 (multiple places, notably near Proctorville and the US-50/OH-32 multiplex)
IN-8 (used to get to work)
IN-9 (multiple places)
WV-10 (near Huntington)
US-11 (multiple places)
US-12 (Coldwater, MI for some lockdown driving)
IL-13, IN-13 (Marion, IL, multiple places)
IN-14 (near Fort Wayne)
US-15, IN-15 (Sumter to Summerton, SC, multiple places)
I-16 (Savannah)
US-17 (Savannah)
IN-18 (Marion, IN)
IN-19 (multiplex with IN-22 and US-35)
I-20, US-20, AL-20 (multiple places, multiple places, Decatur, AL)
AL-21 (multiple places, notably in Talladega County)
I-22, US-22, IN-22 (most of route, Washington CH, OH, Gas City to Kokomo, IN)
US-23 (multiple places, notably Ohio)
US-24 (multiple places, notably IN/OH)
I-25, US-25, IN-25, MS-25, TN-25, WV-25 (NM, multiple places, Logansport to Lafayette, all that's 4 lane, Portland, TN, St Albans, WV)
I-26, IN-26 (Columbia, SC, between I-69 and US-31)
US-27 (multiple places)
IN-28 (same as IN-26)
I-29, US-29 (Council Bluffs, IA, Baltimore, MD area)
US-30 (multiple places, notably IN/OH and Breezewood)
US-31 (multiple places)
IN-32 (multiple places, notably between I-65 and I-74)
US-33 (multiple places, notably anywhere it's 4 lane)
WV-34 (Winfield, WV)
I-35, US-35 (Dallas area and Des Moines, multiple places notably Dayton to Columbus)
US-36 (multiple places, notably Piqua, OH)
IN-37 (multiple places, including all 3 segments (after truncation))
IN-38 (Westfield and Noblesville, IN)
MS-39 (got gas in Meridian one time)
I-40, US-40 (multiple places for both)
US-41 (multiple places)
US-42 (multiple places, notably Cincinnati, OH)
US-43 (multiple places, mostly along Lurleen B Wallace Blvd in Tuscaloosa, AL)
IN-44, KY-44 (near I-65 for each)
US-45, ALT 45 (multiple places, everything north of US-82 in MS)
IN-46 (Columbus, IN)
OH-47 (Sidney, OH)
US-48 (west of Elkins, WV)
I-49, US-49 (Shreveport, LA, Jackson, MS)
US-50, MS-50 (multiple places, everywhere you can see on a map)
US-51 (multiple places, notably in NW Tennessee)
US-52, TN-52 (multiple places, Portland, TN)
AL-53 (Ardmore to Huntsville)
IL-54 (went to Springfield, IL for a wedding)
I-55 (it's only my name and most driven interstate)
IN-56 (Scottsburg, IN exit off I-65)
I-57 (everything south of Champaign)
US-58 (near Cumberland Gap)
I-59 (everything north of Meridian)
US-60 (multiple places, notably in WV)
US-61 (I-55 multiplex in AR)
US-62 (multiple places, notably in Washington CH, OH)
US-63 (multiplex with I-55 again)
I-64 (multiple places, I've yet to drive it without a concurrency (I-57 and I-75), I've been a passenger for much more than that)
I-65 (everything north of Birmingham)
TN-66 (Smoky Mountains)
US-67 (Little Rock to Searcy, AR)
I-68, US-68 (clinched, Xenia, OH)
I-69 (closest interstate to me)
I-70 (multiple places east of I-57)
I-71 (Louisville to Cincinnati)
I-72, US-72 (Champaign to Springfield, multiple places notably Huntsville metro)
OH-73 (Middletown, OH off I-75)
I-74 (multiple places)
I-75 (multiple places)
I-76, TN-76 (multiple places, White House and Brownsville, TN)
I-77, AL-77 (everything south of Charleston, WV (and a segment in Akron), Attalla to Talladega, AL)
US-78 (where it is I-22)
I-79 (multiple places)
I-80 (multiple places, notably from Chicago to Omaha)
I-81, US-81 (multiple places, southern terminus to Rhome)
US-82 (Tuscaloosa to west of Starkville, MS)
I-83 (traveled from Hershey to DC when I was really little, had a nightmare on the turnpike that day)
US-84 (Santa Fe, NM on my way to Taos, also in Valdosta, GA off I-75)
I-85 (multiple places)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 13, 2020, 12:59:48 PM














oscar426
formulanone379
hbelkins298
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
deathtopumpkins157
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rover_0 on September 13, 2020, 06:04:28 PM
For me, it *might* be 4 or 16. I've been on CA-1, CA-2, PA-3, I-5, US-6, UT- and OK-7, UT-8, UT-9, I-10, (former) UT-11, UT-12, UT-13, UT-14, I-15,  off the top of my head.

I've come close to NM-4 (rode on US-550, which intersects NM-4, but I don't recall riding on NM-4. One possible way I've been on a Route 4 is if there was ever an independent UT-4 in the mid-late 1980s that paralleled I-70 west of Sevier UT.

I haven't ever been on US-16 or UT-16 as of this time. I'll have to double-check.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on September 13, 2020, 06:17:40 PM
Quote from: Rover_0 on September 13, 2020, 06:04:28 PM
One possible way I've been on a Route 4 is if there was ever an independent UT-4 in the mid-late 1980s that paralleled I-70 west of Sevier UT.

Nothing ever paralleled I-70, I don't think - SR 4 was just the legislative designation for I-70. The unusual thing about 4 was that it was signed on the original two-lane road before the interstate was built. I've never seen any sort of suggestion that a parallel route was maintained after the interstate opened.

And at any rate, it was decommed in 1977, at which point any portions of the old road that hadn't been replaced yet would have been signed "TEMP I-70". I don't know if SR 4 shields stayed up after '77, but it seems unlikely - there is a photo somewhere online of a SR 4/TEMP I-70 assembly on that portion, but I have no idea when that was taken.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 13, 2020, 10:21:46 PM
Quote from: Rover_0 on September 13, 2020, 06:04:28 PM
For me, it *might* be 4 or 16. I've been on CA-1, CA-2, PA-3, I-5, US-6, UT- and OK-7, UT-8, UT-9, I-10, (former) UT-11, UT-12, UT-13, UT-14, I-15,  off the top of my head.

I've come close to NM-4 (rode on US-550, which intersects NM-4, but I don't recall riding on NM-4. One possible way I've been on a Route 4 is if there was ever an independent UT-4 in the mid-late 1980s that paralleled I-70 west of Sevier UT.

I haven't ever been on US-16 or UT-16 as of this time. I'll have to double-check.
Choose one or choose not.  There is no "might."
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on September 22, 2020, 11:46:37 AM
Picked up Tennessee 379 last week, which now puts me at 398.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 30, 2020, 06:18:21 PM
Only took eight days, but here we go:















oscar426
formulanone398
hbelkins298
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
deathtopumpkins157
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on October 01, 2020, 04:16:23 PM
I get to revise mine. Turns out I have been on KY 298, which has a short concurrency with US 231 south of Owensboro.

I've been on NY 299, KY 300, US 301, KY 302, KY 303, KY 304, KY 305, KY 306, KY 307, KY 308, KY 309, WV 310, WV 311, KY 313, VA 314, KY 315, TN 316, TN 317, TN 318, TN 319, TN 320, US 321, US 322, KY 323, KY 324, KY 325, TN 326, SC 327, KY 328, KY 329, KY 330, WV 331, TN 332, KY 333...

I don't see a 334 that I've been on, so I guess that becomes my lowest-numbered route that I haven't been on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on October 01, 2020, 08:19:59 PM
Here's my top 20:

1: La 1 between Addis and US 190
2: ?
3: TX 3 somewhere near Dickinson. (80% sure of this)
4: I-4 in a couple spots in Orlando
5: I-5 in multiple spots in SoCal
6: TX 6 south of Houston
7: AR 7 in Arkadelphia
8: I-8 in San Diego
9: ?
10: I-10, nearly the entire way from San Antonio to I-75
11: AR-11 near Hazen
12: I-12, entire length
13: AR-13 near Carlisle
14: ?
15: ?
16: ?
17: ?
18: ?
19: LA 19 near I-110
20: I 20 in Jackson and in Marshall, TX

So yeah, I don't think I've ever been on a 2. Weird.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Takumi on October 01, 2020, 08:51:25 PM
Turns out I was wrong about 9, as I totally forgot that most I-95 in Florida carries the internal State Road 9 designation, and I've been on that from I-4 north. My real number is 18.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 02, 2020, 01:09:47 AM
Quote from: Takumi on October 01, 2020, 08:51:25 PM
Turns out I was wrong about 9, as I totally forgot that most I-95 in Florida carries the internal State Road 9 designation, and I've been on that from I-4 north. My real number is 18.
*mutters condescendingly about people counting unsigned routes, but they choose the rules, not me*

I'll update much later today.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on October 02, 2020, 09:15:37 AM
Pandemic torpedoed my planned trip to go get OH 266.  I have to double check but when I finally do go get that, my lowest number not traveled will jump to 427.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on October 02, 2020, 09:37:22 AM
Quote from: Takumi on October 01, 2020, 08:51:25 PM
Turns out I was wrong about 9, as I totally forgot that most I-95 in Florida carries the internal State Road 9 designation, and I've been on that from I-4 north. My real number is 18.

I actually have a small portion of FL 9 just south of FL 924 from a band trip to Miami about 12 years agp, but it was not long enough for me to even include in Travel Mapping.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 02, 2020, 05:55:03 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 02, 2020, 09:15:37 AM
Pandemic torpedoed my planned trip to go get OH 266.  I have to double check but when I finally do go get that, my lowest number not traveled will jump to 427.

You might have 266 if you've been near old US 66 just west of Springfield, Missouri? US 266 in Oklahoma?

428 is my next lowest-number after 398, but that also seems to be a similarly elusive one. FM 428 near Prosper, Texas?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bassoon1986 on October 02, 2020, 07:15:06 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 02, 2020, 05:55:03 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 02, 2020, 09:15:37 AM
Pandemic torpedoed my planned trip to go get OH 266.  I have to double check but when I finally do go get that, my lowest number not traveled will jump to 427.

You might have 266 if you've been near old US 66 just west of Springfield, Missouri? US 266 in Oklahoma?

428 is my next lowest-number after 398, but that also seems to be a similarly elusive one. FM 428 near Prosper, Texas?
Or unless you've driven some city streets in greater New Orleans. 428 is on the West Bank.


iPhone
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 02, 2020, 07:40:40 PM
Quote from: bassoon1986 on October 02, 2020, 07:15:06 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 02, 2020, 05:55:03 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 02, 2020, 09:15:37 AM
Pandemic torpedoed my planned trip to go get OH 266.  I have to double check but when I finally do go get that, my lowest number not traveled will jump to 427.

You might have 266 if you've been near old US 66 just west of Springfield, Missouri? US 266 in Oklahoma?

428 is my next lowest-number after 398, but that also seems to be a similarly elusive one. FM 428 near Prosper, Texas?
Or unless you've driven some city streets in greater New Orleans. 428 is on the West Bank.


iPhone

I haven't been close enough to that for a while...keep forgetting about that one.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Takumi on October 02, 2020, 07:42:51 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 02, 2020, 01:09:47 AM
Quote from: Takumi on October 01, 2020, 08:51:25 PM
Turns out I was wrong about 9, as I totally forgot that most I-95 in Florida carries the internal State Road 9 designation, and I've been on that from I-4 north. My real number is 18.
*mutters condescendingly about people counting unsigned routes, but they choose the rules, not me*

I'll update much later today.
I mean, technically FL 9 is signed somewhere, just not where I've been on it. I'll leave it up to you.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 02, 2020, 08:01:04 PM
Quote from: Takumi on October 02, 2020, 07:42:51 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 02, 2020, 01:09:47 AM
Quote from: Takumi on October 01, 2020, 08:51:25 PM
Turns out I was wrong about 9, as I totally forgot that most I-95 in Florida carries the internal State Road 9 designation, and I've been on that from I-4 north. My real number is 18.
*mutters condescendingly about people counting unsigned routes, but they choose the rules, not me*

I'll update much later today.
I mean, technically FL 9 is signed somewhere, just not where I've been on it. I'll leave it up to you.

Speaking from experience, if you get a traffic citation on I-95 north of Golden Glades Interchange, you'll receive professional confirmation that it is indeed State Road 9.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on October 02, 2020, 08:27:13 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 02, 2020, 05:55:03 PM

You might have 266 if you've been near old US 66 just west of Springfield, Missouri? US 266 in Oklahoma?

428 is my next lowest-number after 398, but that also seems to be a similarly elusive one. FM 428 near Prosper, Texas?

Actually drove I-40 across Oklahoma in Jan 2019 and had I been alone would've done a little back and forth to drive all of US 266.  But can't do that  after 3/4 of a cross country trip with others present...

I thought about getting off I-40 at the US 266 exit to get gas but thought that would've been cheating for the purposes of this thread.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 02, 2020, 10:02:21 PM
I guess this is it.  It's not up to me to choose what you do or do not count.  If you want to count designations that are unsigned, that's up to you when you report your number.  But, I reserve the right to mutter.
















oscar426
formulanone398
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
deathtopumpkins157
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 02, 2020, 10:10:27 PM
Quote from: bassoon1986 on October 02, 2020, 07:15:06 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 02, 2020, 05:55:03 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 02, 2020, 09:15:37 AM
Pandemic torpedoed my planned trip to go get OH 266.  I have to double check but when I finally do go get that, my lowest number not traveled will jump to 427.

You might have 266 if you've been near old US 66 just west of Springfield, Missouri? US 266 in Oklahoma?

428 is my next lowest-number after 398, but that also seems to be a similarly elusive one. FM 428 near Prosper, Texas?
Or unless you've driven some city streets in greater New Orleans. 428 is on the West Bank.


iPhone

Heh.  I've been on that route.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:02:44 PM
US 1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on October 07, 2020, 02:17:26 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:02:44 PM
US 1

Have you never been on ANY route numbered '1'?  That's the point of the thread.  What is the lowest number for which you've never been on ANY route?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:18:49 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 07, 2020, 02:17:26 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:02:44 PM
US 1

Have you never been on ANY route numbered '1'?  That's the point of the thread.  What is the lowest number for which you've never been on ANY route?
Nope, I have been on no route numbered '1'
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: thspfc on October 07, 2020, 02:33:39 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:18:49 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 07, 2020, 02:17:26 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:02:44 PM
US 1

Have you never been on ANY route numbered '1'?  That's the point of the thread.  What is the lowest number for which you've never been on ANY route?
Nope, I have been on no route numbered '1'
Hey, the 1 Club has a new member! Every time I see this thread I become a little bit sad. Wisconsin and their refusal to have single digit state routes.  :angry:
I assume Oregon, or wherever you're from, doesn't either?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:35:12 PM
Quote from: thspfc on October 07, 2020, 02:33:39 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:18:49 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 07, 2020, 02:17:26 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:02:44 PM
US 1

Have you never been on ANY route numbered '1'?  That's the point of the thread.  What is the lowest number for which you've never been on ANY route?
Nope, I have been on no route numbered '1'
Hey, the 1 Club has a new member! Every time I see this thread I become a little bit sad. Wisconsin and their refusal to have single digit state routes.  :angry:
I assume Oregon, or wherever you're from, doesn't either?
Not that I know of.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:36:53 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:35:12 PM
Quote from: thspfc on October 07, 2020, 02:33:39 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:18:49 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 07, 2020, 02:17:26 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:02:44 PM
US 1

Have you never been on ANY route numbered '1'?  That's the point of the thread.  What is the lowest number for which you've never been on ANY route?
Nope, I have been on no route numbered '1'
Hey, the 1 Club has a new member! Every time I see this thread I become a little bit sad. Wisconsin and their refusal to have single digit state routes.  :angry:
I assume Oregon, or wherever you're from, doesn't either?
Not that I know of.
Actually, there is an OR 8, but I don't know of any other single digits.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on October 07, 2020, 10:34:30 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 07, 2020, 02:17:26 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:02:44 PM
US 1

Have you never been on ANY route numbered '1'?  That's the point of the thread.  What is the lowest number for which you've never been on ANY route?

To be fair, I would think that it is not uncommon for someone who lives in the western part of the US to be missing a route numbered "1".  There's no I-1 (Fritzowl notwithstanding); US 1 can be missed by somebody who has never been to the eastern US; and California (among western states) has one of the few major state roads numbered "1".  So if you've never been on US 1 nor CA 1, there's a good chance that you may not be near a route 1.  A few western states have a route 1, but they tend to be minor.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on October 08, 2020, 09:45:59 AM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 07, 2020, 10:34:30 PM

Quote from: kphoger on October 07, 2020, 02:17:26 PM

Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:02:44 PM
US 1

Have you never been on ANY route numbered '1'?  That's the point of the thread.  What is the lowest number for which you've never been on ANY route?

To be fair, I would think that it is not uncommon for someone who lives in the western part of the US to be missing a route numbered "1".  There's no I-1 (Fritzowl notwithstanding); US 1 can be missed by somebody who has never been to the eastern US; and California (among western states) has one of the few major state roads numbered "1".  So if you've never been on US 1 nor CA 1, there's a good chance that you may not be near a route 1.  A few western states have a route 1, but they tend to be minor.

That wasn't my implication.  I only asked because he specifically said "US 1" rather than just "1".
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on October 08, 2020, 10:41:49 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 08, 2020, 09:45:59 AM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 07, 2020, 10:34:30 PM

Quote from: kphoger on October 07, 2020, 02:17:26 PM

Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:02:44 PM
US 1

Have you never been on ANY route numbered '1'?  That's the point of the thread.  What is the lowest number for which you've never been on ANY route?

To be fair, I would think that it is not uncommon for someone who lives in the western part of the US to be missing a route numbered "1".  There's no I-1 (Fritzowl notwithstanding); US 1 can be missed by somebody who has never been to the eastern US; and California (among western states) has one of the few major state roads numbered "1".  So if you've never been on US 1 nor CA 1, there's a good chance that you may not be near a route 1.  A few western states have a route 1, but they tend to be minor.

That wasn't my implication.  I only asked because he specifically said "US 1" rather than just "1".

Oh, OK.  I guess I mis-interpreted your comment.  Sorry 'bout that.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 09, 2020, 02:11:51 PM
Easy enough...















oscar426
formulanone379
hbelkins298
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
plain159
deathtopumpkins157
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: deathtopumpkins on October 13, 2020, 11:56:41 AM
Having picked up AL 157 last week, my lowest number is now 188.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 27, 2020, 12:42:42 AM
Ok.















oscar426
formulanone379
hbelkins298
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
ketchup9912
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ketchup99 on November 28, 2020, 02:04:51 PM
Picked up MA 12,  my next bunch are:

US 13
NY 14
US 15
MA 16
US 17
OH 18
US 19
US 20
NY 21
US 22
NJ 23

So I think that leaves me at 24.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 28, 2020, 05:20:28 PM
Alrighty.
















oscar426
formulanone379
hbelkins298
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
adwerkema108
amroad17107
Buck87107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
Takumi9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on November 28, 2020, 06:28:17 PM
398 for me; I think you copied an old list.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Buck87 on November 28, 2020, 08:27:08 PM
I caught a small section of KY 107 in Hopkinsville this week.

My new number to work on is 112.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 29, 2020, 03:10:29 AM
Quote from: formulanone on November 28, 2020, 06:28:17 PM
398 for me; I think you copied an old list.
$%#*.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 29, 2020, 03:15:18 AM
Alright, now I think we should be all set.  Let me know if anyone's is incorrect...


















oscar426
formulanone398
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on November 29, 2020, 06:18:10 AM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:35:12 PM
Quote from: thspfc on October 07, 2020, 02:33:39 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:18:49 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 07, 2020, 02:17:26 PM
Quote from: idk on October 07, 2020, 02:02:44 PM
US 1

Have you never been on ANY route numbered '1'?  That's the point of the thread.  What is the lowest number for which you've never been on ANY route?
Nope, I have been on no route numbered '1'
Hey, the 1 Club has a new member! Every time I see this thread I become a little bit sad. Wisconsin and their refusal to have single digit state routes.  :angry:
I assume Oregon, or wherever you're from, doesn't either?
Not that I know of.
Yes, it does. It's I-5.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Big John on November 29, 2020, 09:11:15 AM
^^ He is talking about state routes.  Wisconsin has US 2 and US 8.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on November 29, 2020, 10:13:55 PM
Quote from: Big John on November 29, 2020, 09:11:15 AM
^^ He is talking about state routes.  Wisconsin has US 2 and US 8.

I-5 in Oregon carries the internal designation of Pacific Highway No. 1.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 29, 2020, 10:52:29 PM
Quote from: US 89 on November 29, 2020, 10:13:55 PM
Quote from: Big John on November 29, 2020, 09:11:15 AM
^^ He is talking about state routes.  Wisconsin has US 2 and US 8.

I-5 in Oregon carries the internal designation of Pacific Highway No. 1.
Internal designations.  Pfft.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JMoses24 on November 29, 2020, 11:20:38 PM
For me it's 12.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on November 30, 2020, 06:04:25 AM
Quote from: Rothman on November 29, 2020, 10:52:29 PM
Quote from: US 89 on November 29, 2020, 10:13:55 PM
Quote from: Big John on November 29, 2020, 09:11:15 AM
^^ He is talking about state routes.  Wisconsin has US 2 and US 8.

I-5 in Oregon carries the internal designation of Pacific Highway No. 1.
Internal designations.  Pfft.
I'll let you count it too if you've been on Oregon's I-5 :bigass:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 05, 2020, 01:34:12 PM
















oscar426
formulanone398
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bassoon1986 on December 05, 2020, 10:02:41 PM
For those of you with a single digit for your lowest numbered highway, if you suddenly had that highway number clinched or driven, how much higher would your answer jump to?


iPhone
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on December 06, 2020, 12:39:00 AM
Quote from: bassoon1986 on December 05, 2020, 10:02:41 PM
For those of you with a single digit for your lowest numbered highway, if you suddenly had that highway number clinched or driven, how much higher would your answer jump to?

Mine would jump from 2 to 9, an increase of 7.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: FrCorySticha on December 06, 2020, 04:51:53 PM
As far as I can tell, the lowest number that I haven't been on is 8. The next highway I have been on is US 10.
Title: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on December 11, 2020, 04:15:12 PM
I picked up Kentucky 398 last week, so I am now up to 428 as my lowest un-driven number.

Here's photos of most of them. (https://www.flickr.com/photos/formulanone/albums/72157715680599033) (I've driven on Loop 343 in Austin, but without any sign photos...sometimes the camera actually isn't with me.)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 11, 2020, 11:17:48 PM
How the mighty has fallen!



















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
FrCorySticha8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on December 12, 2020, 10:47:26 PM
For me, including as a passenger. If it's me driving only, it's 1:

US 1, MA 2, US 3, I-4, I-5, US 6, G7 (China), KY 8, US 9, I-10, US 11, US 12, IL 13, US 14, US 15, OH 16, KY 17, US 18, US 19, I-20, MO 21, US 22, US 23, I-24, US 25, FL 26, US 27, OH 28, US 29, US 30, US 31, OH 32, US 33, US 34, US 35, US 36, IN 37, IL 38, I-39, I-40, US 41, US 42, PA 43, I-44, US 45, IN 46

That leaves 47 as my lowest. Going to give a special thank you to I-465 here, or else I would've missed 31, 36 and 37.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: skquinn on December 12, 2020, 10:57:50 PM
I've been on NASA Road 1, but no route numbered 2 I know of. After I find a route numbered 2, it will jump to 4 (Texas 3), then 7 (Spur 5, Texas 6), then at least 11 (Beltway 8, Vermont/New Hampshire 9, I-10).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 13, 2020, 03:07:01 AM
n00bs added. :D



















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
FrCorySticha8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on December 13, 2020, 09:35:54 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on December 12, 2020, 10:47:26 PM
For me, including as a passenger. If it's me driving only, it's 1:

US 1, MA 2, US 3, I-4, I-5, US 6, G7 (China), KY 8, US 9, I-10, US 11, US 12, IL 13, US 14, US 15, OH 16, KY 17, US 18, US 19, I-20, MO 21, US 22, US 23, I-24, US 25, FL 26, US 27, OH 28, US 29, US 30, US 31, OH 32, US 33, US 34, US 35, US 36, IN 37, IL 38, I-39, I-40, US 41, US 42, PA 43, I-44, US 45, IN 46

That leaves 47 as my lowest. Going to give a special thank you to I-465 here, or else I would've missed 31, 36 and 37.

You have been on the "Middle of Nowhere expressway"? Wow. Bear in mind G6 and G7 are on different alignments between Beijing and Hohhot (and G7 still has a gap in Beijing), so you may have never been on a route numbered 7 (especially true if you try to claim the Badaling expressway, which is only G6). As for me I have never driven a route numbered 3 (only intersected one), even though I've been on several routes of that number
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bitmapped on December 13, 2020, 07:12:17 PM
For me, it's 111. The closest options are in NW Ohio and the Christiansburg, VA area, both 4+ hours away. I'm probably more likely to get Christiansburg than the Ohio one.

After that, I'm up to 137 and 139.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on December 14, 2020, 04:53:05 PM
Quote from: Bitmapped on December 13, 2020, 07:12:17 PM
For me, it's 111. The closest options are in NW Ohio and the Christiansburg, VA area, both 4+ hours away. I'm probably more likely to get Christiansburg than the Ohio one.

After that, I'm up to 137 and 139.

KY 111 is about an hour west of the Big Sandy River. Accessible from I-64 from either exit 121 or 123 at Owingsville. Two hours to Charleston, another hour to Huntington, and another hour to Owingsville, and you're there. Probably closer than Christiansburg.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 15, 2020, 10:43:15 AM
Updated



















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Hot Rod Hootenanny145
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
FrCorySticha8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: nexus73 on December 15, 2020, 10:46:08 AM
US 1 for me.  I have been on US 2 in Washington.

Rick
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 15, 2020, 12:19:47 PM
Quote from: nexus73 on December 15, 2020, 10:46:08 AM
US 1 for me.  I have been on US 2 in Washington.

Rick
Out of any numbered highway, US Highway or not?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on December 15, 2020, 12:49:25 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on December 13, 2020, 09:35:54 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on December 12, 2020, 10:47:26 PM
For me, including as a passenger. If it's me driving only, it's 1:

US 1, MA 2, US 3, I-4, I-5, US 6, G7 (China), KY 8, US 9, I-10, US 11, US 12, IL 13, US 14, US 15, OH 16, KY 17, US 18, US 19, I-20, MO 21, US 22, US 23, I-24, US 25, FL 26, US 27, OH 28, US 29, US 30, US 31, OH 32, US 33, US 34, US 35, US 36, IN 37, IL 38, I-39, I-40, US 41, US 42, PA 43, I-44, US 45, IN 46

That leaves 47 as my lowest. Going to give a special thank you to I-465 here, or else I would've missed 31, 36 and 37.

You have been on the "Middle of Nowhere expressway"? Wow. Bear in mind G6 and G7 are on different alignments between Beijing and Hohhot (and G7 still has a gap in Beijing), so you may have never been on a route numbered 7 (especially true if you try to claim the Badaling expressway, which is only G6). As for me I have never driven a route numbered 3 (only intersected one), even though I've been on several routes of that number
Just checked baidu maps, you're right, it was G6 to Badaling. Thought it was G7 the entire time. I did think of another entry for my 7. There's a 1 mile long concurrently with VA-7 when turning from VA-267 west to US 15 north in Leesburg. Idk how I missed it when making my list the first time.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 15, 2020, 01:10:52 PM
Quote from: SkyPesos on December 15, 2020, 12:49:25 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on December 13, 2020, 09:35:54 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on December 12, 2020, 10:47:26 PM
For me, including as a passenger. If it's me driving only, it's 1:

US 1, MA 2, US 3, I-4, I-5, US 6, G7 (China), KY 8, US 9, I-10, US 11, US 12, IL 13, US 14, US 15, OH 16, KY 17, US 18, US 19, I-20, MO 21, US 22, US 23, I-24, US 25, FL 26, US 27, OH 28, US 29, US 30, US 31, OH 32, US 33, US 34, US 35, US 36, IN 37, IL 38, I-39, I-40, US 41, US 42, PA 43, I-44, US 45, IN 46

That leaves 47 as my lowest. Going to give a special thank you to I-465 here, or else I would've missed 31, 36 and 37.

You have been on the "Middle of Nowhere expressway"? Wow. Bear in mind G6 and G7 are on different alignments between Beijing and Hohhot (and G7 still has a gap in Beijing), so you may have never been on a route numbered 7 (especially true if you try to claim the Badaling expressway, which is only G6). As for me I have never driven a route numbered 3 (only intersected one), even though I've been on several routes of that number
Just checked baidu maps, you're right, it was G6 to Badaling. Thought it was G7 the entire time. I did think of another entry for my 7. There's a 1 mile long concurrently with VA-7 when turning from VA-267 west to US 15 north in Leesburg. Idk how I missed it when making my list the first time.
So...what's yer number?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on December 15, 2020, 02:07:41 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 15, 2020, 01:10:52 PM
Quote from: SkyPesos on December 15, 2020, 12:49:25 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on December 13, 2020, 09:35:54 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on December 12, 2020, 10:47:26 PM
For me, including as a passenger. If it's me driving only, it's 1:

US 1, MA 2, US 3, I-4, I-5, US 6, G7 (China), KY 8, US 9, I-10, US 11, US 12, IL 13, US 14, US 15, OH 16, KY 17, US 18, US 19, I-20, MO 21, US 22, US 23, I-24, US 25, FL 26, US 27, OH 28, US 29, US 30, US 31, OH 32, US 33, US 34, US 35, US 36, IN 37, IL 38, I-39, I-40, US 41, US 42, PA 43, I-44, US 45, IN 46

That leaves 47 as my lowest. Going to give a special thank you to I-465 here, or else I would've missed 31, 36 and 37.

You have been on the "Middle of Nowhere expressway"? Wow. Bear in mind G6 and G7 are on different alignments between Beijing and Hohhot (and G7 still has a gap in Beijing), so you may have never been on a route numbered 7 (especially true if you try to claim the Badaling expressway, which is only G6). As for me I have never driven a route numbered 3 (only intersected one), even though I've been on several routes of that number
Just checked baidu maps, you're right, it was G6 to Badaling. Thought it was G7 the entire time. I did think of another entry for my 7. There's a 1 mile long concurrently with VA-7 when turning from VA-267 west to US 15 north in Leesburg. Idk how I missed it when making my list the first time.
So...what's yer number?
still the same, 47.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on December 16, 2020, 10:18:46 AM
Picked off 145 and 164 (the next two numbers I needed), in Eastern Ohio, yesterday.  I'm up to 184 now.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: nexus73 on December 16, 2020, 02:38:17 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 15, 2020, 12:19:47 PM
Quote from: nexus73 on December 15, 2020, 10:46:08 AM
US 1 for me.  I have been on US 2 in Washington.

Rick
Out of any numbered highway, US Highway or not?

Is there a Highway 0 someplace?  I have been on 1 in California many times.

Rick
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on December 16, 2020, 02:40:29 PM
Quote from: nexus73 on December 16, 2020, 02:38:17 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 15, 2020, 12:19:47 PM
Quote from: nexus73 on December 15, 2020, 10:46:08 AM
US 1 for me.  I have been on US 2 in Washington.

Rick
Out of any numbered highway, US Highway or not?

Is there a Highway 0 someplace?  I have been on 1 in California many times.

Rick

Missouri?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on December 16, 2020, 02:47:34 PM
Quote from: nexus73 on December 16, 2020, 02:38:17 PM
Is there a Highway 0 someplace?  I have been on 1 in California many times.

Brussels (Belgium) has a ring road numbered R0.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 16, 2020, 03:15:04 PM
Updated again.




















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
FrCorySticha8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on December 16, 2020, 03:36:43 PM
Quote from: corco on June 14, 2019, 08:43:30 PM
I've fully clinched at least one route numbered all the way up to 63.

I was looking through Travel Mapping, and my lowest not-clinched route number would be 28 (though I had completed "US 27 Alternate" before it disappeared in 1997, TM won't count it.)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on December 26, 2020, 09:40:15 AM
Going on a road trip to pick up a new car, and just wanted to see how many new numbers might be on the trip. Obviously I'll not try to drive every single new number I see, but I think I can get my number from 106 to 203.

106 - VA
108 - AR
111 - FL
132 - VA
136 - PA
137 - NE
140 - AL
146 - MD
147 - AL
151 - IA
153 - WY
156 - VA
174 - MD
178 - MD
179 - MD
188 - PA
192 - VA
193 - OH
198 - MS
199 - AL

For those wondering, my general route is going down to Lubbock, cutting across to Georgia via Dallas, Texarkana, Monroe, Jackson, Montgomery, Auburn, Columbus and then heading down I-75 to Tampa.  (Visiting my parents in Florida is also part of this equation).

Coming back, going up to Delaware mostly via I-95, I-64, and US13, then finishing off clinching I-70 and I-68 before heading up towards Cleveland to come back on the toll roads.  Then finally clinching Iowa's interstates with I-380, cutting across on US20 across northern Nebraaska, coming into extreme eastern Wyoming, and back home.

Finalizing the route today, but I have to think I'll be adding something like 2000 miles of new roads and upwards of 100 new counties.

Chris

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 26, 2020, 09:41:57 AM
That's a long way to go to pick up a new car.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on December 26, 2020, 09:51:46 AM
Quote from: Rothman on December 26, 2020, 09:41:57 AM
That's a long way to go to pick up a new car.

Again, mostly to visit my parents, but I have 3 weeks before I start a new job, so I figured I'd make a road trip out of it (also since my wife doesn't want me flying at the moment.)  The car I'm looking at is about $2,500 cheaper than I'd be able to get it around here, so I figured, since I had the time, why not?

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: FrCorySticha on December 26, 2020, 04:37:38 PM
Thinking back, I have been on a route 8: BIA Route 8 on the Ft. Belknap Indian Reservation in north central Montana. So, currently my lowest number is actually 9.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Caps81943 on December 28, 2020, 01:30:50 PM
Let me give a go at this:

US-1 US-2 VA-3 DE-4 VA-5 US-6 VA-7 KY-8 (thank god for a Kentucky rerouting 4 months before the trip; I'd have no 8 otherwise!) NY-9N (KY-9 if we're not doing suffixes) US-10
US-11 US-12 IN-13 US-14 US-15 WI-16 US-17 US-18 US-19 I-20
TX-21 US-22 WI-23 VA-24 US-25 WI-26 US-27 VA-28 US-29 US-30
US-31 WI-32 US-33 MD-34 US-35 US-36 IN-37 IN-38 I-39 US-40
US-41 WI-42 I-43 I-44 I-45 US-46 WI-47 US-48 US-49
US-50 US-51 US-52 IN-53 WI-54 VA-55 MD-56 WI-57 US-58 I-59 US-60
US-61 (I think) US-62 MD-63 I-64 I-65 I-66 WI-67 I-68 I-69
I-70 I-71 I-72 WI-73 I-74 I-75 I-76 I-77 US-78 I-79 I-80
I-81 CT-82 I-83 US-84 MD-85 TX-86I-87 AR-88 I-89 I-90
I-91 NE-92 I-93 I-94 I-95 I-96 I-97 AK-98 I-99 WI-100

NOTE: I posted up to 21 earlier, then accidentally deleted when I tried to edit it up to 100.

EDIT: added TX-21, I-44, WI-54

1/4/22 EDIT: added MD-85

1/11/22 EDIT: added CT-82

9/18/22 EDIT: added AR-88 and NE-92

6/10/23: added TX-86

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 28, 2020, 07:14:50 PM
Updated again.




















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
corco144
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
74/171FAN47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Caps81943 on December 29, 2020, 12:17:24 AM
Quote from: Rothman on December 28, 2020, 07:14:50 PM
Updated again.




Corey8194321

Got my name wrong  :pan: :-D

Otherwise thanks!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: corco on December 29, 2020, 12:23:34 AM
Quote from: Rothman on December 28, 2020, 07:14:50 PM
Updated again.



corco144

I haven't looked at this in a while - but clinched California 144 back in January. That puts me up to 176, but I'm planning to clinch Utah 176 this coming January.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on December 29, 2020, 01:52:43 AM
Quote from: corco on December 29, 2020, 12:23:34 AM
I'm planning to clinch Utah 176 this coming January.

It currently consists of a short bridge over some train tracks and the approaches to it. You will be underwhelmed.

As for my 46 response, that is still the case and probably will remain so for quite some time. But after that, the only remaining 2-digit number I lack is 57 (plus 47 if you don’t count traveling on the since-deleted section of NM 47). I’ll hopefully clinch Utah 57 within the year...after which my next untraveled number will be 146.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 29, 2020, 07:19:54 AM
Quote from: Caps81943 on December 29, 2020, 12:17:24 AM
Quote from: Rothman on December 28, 2020, 07:14:50 PM
Updated again.




Corey8194321

Got my name wrong  :pan: :-D

Otherwise thanks!
Heh.  Odd typo there. Evidently, FrCorySticha put Corey on my mind. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on December 29, 2020, 01:53:19 PM
I got NJ 47 by clinching US 40 and US 322 in New Jersey on Saturday.  My number is up to 89 now.   
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on December 29, 2020, 04:14:22 PM
Quote from: Rothman on December 29, 2020, 07:19:54 AM
Quote from: Caps81943 on December 29, 2020, 12:17:24 AM
Quote from: Rothman on December 28, 2020, 07:14:50 PM
Updated again.




Corey8194321

Got my name wrong  :pan: :-D

Otherwise thanks!
Heh.  Odd typo there. Evidently, FrCorySticha put Corey on my mind. :D
Or me!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: WillWeaverRVA on December 29, 2020, 04:17:28 PM
Pretty sure my lowest is 8. I haven't been on VA 8. I haven't been on VA 4 either, but I have been on MD 4.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: sharkyfour on December 29, 2020, 10:42:33 PM
For me, I think the answer is 19...  Most are covered by routes inside my home state of Connecticut, but some I did have to go out of state for.

1:  US-1
2:  CT-2
3:  CT-3, US-3
4:  CT-4, I-4
5:  US-5
6:  US-6 (have always lived within 2 miles of it)
7:  US-7
8:  CT-8
9:  CT-9
10:  CT-10
11:  CT-11
12:  CT-12
13:  US-13
14:  CT-14
15:  CT-15
16:  CT-16
17:  CT-17
18:  NH-18

As for 19, it seems to either be non-existant or short little out of the way stubs in all the states near me, and I can't think of a route 19 I've been on outside my area, either.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 29, 2020, 11:03:47 PM




















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
corco176
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
jayhawkco106
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on January 07, 2021, 08:32:18 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on December 26, 2020, 09:40:15 AM
Going on a road trip to pick up a new car, and just wanted to see how many new numbers might be on the trip. Obviously I'll not try to drive every single new number I see, but I think I can get my number from 106 to 203.

106 - VA
108 - AR
111 - FL
132 - VA
136 - PA
137 - NE
140 - AL
146 - MD
147 - AL
151 - IA
153 - WY
156 - VA
174 - MD
178 - MD
179 - MD
188 - PA
192 - VA
193 - OH
198 - MS
199 - AL

For those wondering, my general route is going down to Lubbock, cutting across to Georgia via Dallas, Texarkana, Monroe, Jackson, Montgomery, Auburn, Columbus and then heading down I-75 to Tampa.  (Visiting my parents in Florida is also part of this equation).

Coming back, going up to Delaware mostly via I-95, I-64, and US13, then finishing off clinching I-70 and I-68 before heading up towards Cleveland to come back on the toll roads.  Then finally clinching Iowa's interstates with I-380, cutting across on US20 across northern Nebraaska, coming into extreme eastern Wyoming, and back home.

Finalizing the route today, but I have to think I'll be adding something like 2000 miles of new roads and upwards of 100 new counties.

Chris

Just finished the road trip last night.  My new number is 203.  I had to change my routing home to avoid some weather.  Ended up nabbing a couple numbers I was missing in Illinois and Kansas. While clinching KS-137, my car actually got attacked by a couple of dogs that kept barking and lunging at my front tires.  I was afraid I'd run them over or hurt them, so I drove the .18 miles back from the end to KS20 at about 3 mph.  :)

Looks like the closest 203 is in the panhandle of Texas, not exactly my favorite place to drive through.  So it might be a while before I can add to my number.

New "proof":

1: US, CA, CO, DE, FL, GA, MO, ND
2: US, CO, MD, MO
3: CO, GA, IL, MA, MN, ND, OK
4: I, US, KS, OH
5: I, CO, DE, FL, GA, KS, MN, MO
6: US, ID, MN, OK, OR, TX
7: US, CO, GA, KS, MO, OR, UT
8: I, US, CO, ID, LA
9: CO, CT, FL, IN, LA, ME, MO, NH, OK, SC, UT
10: I, US, AL, CO, FL, IL, KS, NE, NH, OK, OR, WY
11: I, US, CO, MO, NH, OK, OR, WI, WY
12: I, US, AR, CA, CO, IA, UT
13: US, CO, FL, MN, MO, UT
14: US, AL, AR, CO, KS
15: I, US, CO, KS, MN, MO
16: I, US, AR, CO, DE, FL, MD, MN, NH
17: I, US, CA, CO, CT, MO, NJ, NM, NY, UT, WA
18: US, AR, CA, KS, MN, UT
19: I, US, MN, MO, NE, UT
20: I, US, DE, FL, KS, MN, WA
21: US, AL, CO, FL, GA, MN, TX
22: I, US, AL, CA, CO, MN, MO, ND, WY
23: US, CA, CO, MN
24: I, US, DE, FL
25: I, US, GA, ID, KS, MN, NE, WI
26: I, US, CO, FL, GA, IL, NM, PA
27: I, US, AL, GA, ID, IA, KS, MN, NE
28: AL, ID, LA, MT, UT
29: I, US, CA, IL, NM, WI
30: I, US, CO, DE, GA, OK, UT
31: US, KS, MO
32: ID, KS, MO
33: GA, ID, MN, MO, VA
34: US, ID, MO, OK, SC, SD, TX, UT
35: I, US, CO, OR, TX, WI
36: US, CO, DE, MN
37: I, IN, MI, MO, OK, OR, SD
38: GA, IA, MN
39: I, CO, ID, MO
40: I, US, CO, FL
41: I, US, AL, CO, GA, MT
42: CO, NC, SD
43: I, US, MI, MN, MO, UT
44: I, CO, ID, SD, UT
45: I, US, CO, GA, LA, MO, SD
46: CO, TX, UT
47: CO, ID, LA, MN, MT, OR
48: MN
49: I, US, CA, GA, OH
50: US, ID, MI, MN, SD, WY
51: US, ID, MN, OK
52: US, AL, CO, KS, MO, NY
53: US, CO, NE, OK
54: US, TX
55: I, CO, ID, MN
56: US, CO, IL, MN
57: I, CO, IN, KS
58: CO, MN, MO, UT
59: I, US, CO, MO, MT, UT, WY
60: US, CO, MN, TX
61: US, AZ, CO, KY
62: US, CO, IN, MN
63: US, CO, KS, MI, SD, TN, UT
64: I, US, AZ, CO
65: I, US, CO, PA, WI
66: I, CO, MO, OK
67: US, AZ, CO, IN, NE
68: I, CA
69: I, US, AL, CO
70: I, US, TX, WY
71: I, US, CO, NE, TX
72: I, CO, MO, NM
73: I, US, MN, NC, SD
74: I, US, AR, CO, MN, MO
75: I, US, CO
76: I, US, MO
77: I, US, AZ, AR, MN, MO
78: I, US, CO, ID, MO, MT
79: I, US, CO, SD
80: I, US, AZ
81: I, US
82: I, US, AZ, CO
83: I, US, AZ, CO, MO
84: I, US, CA
85: I, US
86: I, AZ, CO, MO
87: I, US, AZ, MN, MO
88: I, CO, TN
89: I, US, AZ, CA, CO, WY
90: I, US, AZ, CO, GA, MO
91: I, US, CO
92: US, AZ, CO, IL, KS, MO
93: I, US, CO, MN
94: I, CO, IL, MO
95: I, US, CO, MN, TX, WY
96: I, CO, KS, MI, MO
97: I, US, CO, MN
98: US, AZ
99: I, AZ, CA, GA, KS, MN, OR, UT, WA
100: CO, FL, MN, MO, VA
101: US, AZ, CO, MN
102: FL, UT
103: CO
104: FL, IL
105: I, CO, FL, MN, MO
106: VA
107: NH
108: TX
109: CO, FL, ME
110: I, CO, IL, MO
111: FL
112: CO, GA
113: US, CA, CO, FL
114: CO, TX
115: I, CO, FL, SD
116: CA, CO
117: AR
118: NM, UT
119: US, CO
120: CO, UT, WY
121: CO, IL
122: NM
123: AL
124: I
125: CO, GA
126: I, AL, FL
127: US, CO
128: CA, CO, KS, MA
129: I, MO
130: US, UT, WY
131: CO
132: VA
133: CO, GA
134: CA, CO, VA
135: I, CA, CO, MT
136: US
137: KS
138: US
139: CO, MO, NJ
140: AL, CO
141: CO
142: MO
143: UT, VA
144: CO
145: CO
146: LA
147: LA
148: TX
149: CO, MN
150: US, CO, MO
151: CO, LA, MO
152: FL, MO
153: UT
154: LA, MO
155: I
156: VA
157: CO
158: US, TX
159: US
160: US, CA, UT
161: UT
162: UT
163: US
164: I, IL, WI
165: I, CO
166: US, CA, VA
167: US, CO
168: VA
169: US, AL
170: AR, CO, NM, SC
171: MO, WA
172: I, CO, NV
173: NV, NJ
174: MD
175: AR
176: US
177: CO, KS
178: MD
179: MD
180: I, US, VA
181: US, NM, PA
182: I
183: US, CO
184: I, CO
185: I, TX
186: AZ
187: KS
188: KS, PA
189: US, AZ
190: I, US
191: US
192: KS
193: OH
194: I, CO, MN
195: I, US, GA
196: CO
197: US
198: MS
199: AL
200: FL, ID, MN, MT
201: OR
202: US, AZ, CO, FL

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 14, 2021, 09:50:28 PM
Quite belatedly updated...interesting that there's that big space between 203 and 245...

And things seem to get easier after you break through that 102 wall...





















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
corco176
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaner44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bruce on January 14, 2021, 09:59:07 PM
I haven't been on SR 6 in WA, so I guess that's my cutoff.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on January 15, 2021, 09:38:23 AM
I hate to nitpick, but the list shows a misspelling for "sbeaver44 (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=24342.msg2466096#msg2466096)".
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on January 15, 2021, 12:18:31 PM
Quote from: Rothman on January 14, 2021, 09:50:28 PM
Quite belatedly updated...interesting that there's that big space between 203 and 245...

And unfortunately, it won't be super easy for me to close that gap. Between those, I'm missing 203, 204, 211, 213, 216, 222, 226, 232, 236, and 237.  None of which are in Colorado. 

Utah, New Mexico, and Wyoming have all of those at least.  Just not too many appear to be too close to the Colorado border (213, 216, and 222 in Wyoming are only a few hours away).

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 15, 2021, 02:25:11 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 15, 2021, 09:38:23 AM
I hate to nitpick, but the list shows a misspelling for "sbeaver44 (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=24342.msg2466096#msg2466096)".

Pfft.  Been that way for over a year.  Might as well keep it. :P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 15, 2021, 02:26:20 PM
Updated.





















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
corco176
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: DeaconG on January 15, 2021, 06:33:19 PM
This is a very interesting thread! I'll throw my hat in the ring!
The number is 6:

1: US-1, DE-1
2: FL-2, MD-2
3: FL-3, PA-3, MD-3
4: I-4, MD-4, NC-4
5: MD-5
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 15, 2021, 09:44:01 PM
Surprised 6 is a hard number to get.





















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
corco176
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
Great Lakes Roads48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: mhking on January 18, 2021, 12:49:48 PM
US 3/I-2?

There's no way I can start punching out state routes...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 18, 2021, 12:54:40 PM
Quote from: mhking on January 18, 2021, 12:49:48 PM
US 3/I-2?

There's no way I can start punching out state routes...
This is about any numbered route.  If you've been on any route 2, then the lowest is 3.  If you've been on a 3, then 4...

Need one number. :)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: mhking on January 18, 2021, 12:58:02 PM
Quote from: Rothman on January 18, 2021, 12:54:40 PM
Quote from: mhking on January 18, 2021, 12:49:48 PM
US 3/I-2?

There's no way I can start punching out state routes...
This is about any numbered route.  If you've been on any route 2, then the lowest is 3.  If you've been on a 3, then 4...



Need one number. :)

Yeah, but with my memory? (smh) (shrug)
Give me awhile, I may be able to cobble together a list...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Great Lakes Roads on January 20, 2021, 12:54:48 AM
Quote from: Great Lakes Roads on February 04, 2020, 01:53:48 AM
Looks like number 48 for me as the lowest-numbered route. Next lowest-number route would be up to 107.

I drove on a section of US 48 in West Virginia today! The next number that I haven't been on is still 107.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on January 20, 2021, 07:25:59 AM
Quote from: Great Lakes Roads on January 20, 2021, 12:54:48 AM
Quote from: Great Lakes Roads on February 04, 2020, 01:53:48 AM
Looks like number 48 for me as the lowest-numbered route. Next lowest-number route would be up to 107.

I drove on a section of US 48 in West Virginia today! The next number that I haven't been on is still 107.

107 is what I've been stuck on for a while. There's a 107 and 108 near each other in far NW Ohio but I haven't gotten around to getting over there yet.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 20, 2021, 01:42:14 PM
Updated.





















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
corco176
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: corco on January 22, 2021, 06:21:15 PM
Looks like I'm now clear up at 329
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 22, 2021, 06:45:45 PM
Updated.  Corco's taking this seriously.





















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
corco176
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TBKS1 on January 22, 2021, 06:47:56 PM
I think the lowest numbered route I haven't been on yet is 39, despite having a picture of AR 39. Most of the lower numbered routes I've been on are usually state highways. The lowest numbered US Route I've been on is US 11, and the lowest numbered Interstate is I-10.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: RyanB06 on January 22, 2021, 06:53:42 PM
I'm also in the 14 Club:

US-1/DE-1
CT-2
US-3/CT-3
CT-4
US-5/ME-5
US-6
US-7
CT-8
CT-9
CT-10
CT-11
CT-12
US-13
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 22, 2021, 07:08:40 PM
Quote from: nexus73 on December 16, 2020, 02:38:17 PM
Is there a Highway 0 someplace?  I have been on 1 in California many times.

Oklahoma has a few highways that are listed as SH 0 (and even a "0B") in the books, although none of them are signed as anything, so it's up to you to determine if this is actually Highway 0 or just a shorthand for "no designation".
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TBKS1 on January 22, 2021, 07:20:06 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on January 22, 2021, 07:08:40 PM
Oklahoma has a few highways that are listed as SH 0 (and even a "0B") in the books, although none of them are signed as anything, so it's up to you to determine if this is actually Highway 0 or just a shorthand for "no designation".

Where do/did these routes even go to?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 22, 2021, 07:43:57 PM
Quote from: TBKS1 on January 22, 2021, 07:20:06 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on January 22, 2021, 07:08:40 PM
Oklahoma has a few highways that are listed as SH 0 (and even a "0B") in the books, although none of them are signed as anything, so it's up to you to determine if this is actually Highway 0 or just a shorthand for "no designation".

Where do/did these routes even go to?

One is a section of Lincoln Boulevard in Oklahoma City that has the state capitol in the median, as well as a number of state agencies (including ODOT HQ) among it. It used to be part of US-66 and US-77 back in the day, and carried the SH-107 designation for a while too.

Two of them are loop routes off of SH-33 in Langston and Coyle. Probably old alignments of SH-33.

Two are bypasses, around Duncan and Poteau, that never had the through routes moved to them.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on January 23, 2021, 12:02:38 AM
One of us can go on one of the 4 highway 0's on this list
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highways_numbered_0
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 23, 2021, 05:22:42 PM



















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
HTM Duke248
Duke87245
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
corco176
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: HTM Duke on February 10, 2021, 05:41:00 PM
I took a two day trip up to Enterprise, AL, last week, and clinched AL-248 and GA-266 along the way.  This now pushes me up to 325.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 10, 2021, 06:26:46 PM




















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
corco329
HTM Duke325
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
corco176
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: tq-07fan on February 10, 2021, 07:02:58 PM
Here is my list of what I've driven on at least for some part. I don't include all the states that I've driven on a particular route but used some of the more interesting ones or the ones I thought of first in those cases. New Zealand Route 1 and Nebraska Route 18 are two I am rather proud of.

1   NZ      31   US      61   NE         91   US      
2   OH      32   OH      62   US         92   NE      
3   OH      33   US      63   OH         93   OH      
4   OH      34   US      64   I         94   I      
5   NY      35   US      65   OH         95   I      
6   US      36   US      66   OH         96   I      
7   OH      37   OH      67   OH         97   NE      
8   OH      38   OH      68   US         98   US      
9   IN        39   IN      69   PA         99   CA      
10   WV      40   US      70   I         100   TN      
11   OH      41   OH      71   I         101   IN      
12   US      42   US      72   OH         102   WV/VA      
13   OH      43   IN      73   OH         103   OH   
14   OH      44   IN      74   I         104   OH      
15   OH      45   US      75   I         105   IL      
16   OH      46   IN      76   I         106   WV   Ohio River Bridge   
17   US      47   OH      77   AZ         107   ??? None Found Yet [In my records]      
18   NE      48   OH      78   I         108         
19   US      49   OH      79   I         109   OH      
20   US      50   US      80   I         110   IL      
21   NE      51   PA      81   I                  
22   US      52   US      82   US                  
23   US      53   PA      83   US                  
24   US      54   OH      84   I                  
25   US      55   OH      85   OH   Pymatuning Resevor!               
26    IL      56   OH      86   I                  
27   US      57   I      87   US                  
28   OH      58   IN      88   PA                  
29   OH      59   IN      89   US               
30   US      60   US      90   US                  
                                       
I got to 107 but a couple were rather surprising that they don't show up more often.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 10, 2021, 08:12:51 PM



















formulanone428
oscar426
hbelkins334
corco329
HTM Duke325
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
corco176
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on February 11, 2021, 07:21:11 AM
Quote from: tq-07fan on February 10, 2021, 07:02:58 PM

107   ??? None Found Yet      
108         


107 and 108 are also the two lowest that I'm missing. They both exist very near each other in the far NW corner of Ohio.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: tq-07fan on February 11, 2021, 09:06:46 AM
Quote from: cabiness42 on February 11, 2021, 07:21:11 AM
Quote from: tq-07fan on February 10, 2021, 07:02:58 PM

107   ??? None Found Yet      
108         


107 and 108 are also the two lowest that I'm missing. They both exist very near each other in the far NW corner of Ohio.

I guess I should have said none found in my records. I see that I actually passed under OH 107 in 1996 while operating a piece of railway equipment on the former Wabash, now Norfolk Southern. I also saw the signage for Nova Scotia 107 from the buses. I may have to visit Montpelier Ohio sometime this Spring...

Jim
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on February 19, 2021, 09:32:10 AM
Drove on FM 428 last week near Denton, so my lowest un-driven route number is now 456.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on February 21, 2021, 12:13:04 AM
My lowest un-driven route number is now 448. I got many of the ones I was missing between 425 and 448, scattered around Orlando.

My next four un-driven numbers are 448, 449, 455, and 461.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Alps on February 21, 2021, 12:33:44 AM
Quote from: oscar on February 21, 2021, 12:13:04 AM
My lowest un-driven route number is now 448. I got many of the ones I was missing between 425 and 448, scattered around Orlando.

My next four un-driven numbers are 448, 449, 455, and 461.
I only keep track of clinches, but I have all but 455 on that list. (I just went through verifying I've been on a 323 - QC.)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 21, 2021, 09:27:21 AM
Clash of the titans...





















formulanone456
oscar448
hbelkins334
corco329
HTM Duke325
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on February 21, 2021, 09:28:44 AM
Just FYI, Corco is on there twice.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 21, 2021, 09:45:34 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on February 21, 2021, 09:28:44 AM
Just FYI, Corco is on there twice.

Chris

So?  He doesn't care. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on February 21, 2021, 09:51:06 AM
Quote from: Rothman on February 21, 2021, 09:45:34 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on February 21, 2021, 09:28:44 AM
Just FYI, Corco is on there twice.

Chris

So?  He doesn't care. :D

I was looking to see who could catch up and knock me out of the top 10 and saw he was close, but also ahead of me.  :bigass:

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on February 21, 2021, 10:30:54 AM
Looking ahead...Routes numbered 477 and 479 are going to be tough ones to find. Kentucky seems to be the most logical place to get those.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on February 21, 2021, 10:36:39 AM
Quote from: formulanone on February 21, 2021, 10:30:54 AM
Looking ahead...Routes numbered 477 and 479 are going to be tough ones to find. Kentucky seems to be the most logical place to get those.

PA 477 has an interchange with US 220 just north of I-80.  I am not sure this helps you out much though.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on February 21, 2021, 10:42:33 AM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on February 21, 2021, 10:36:39 AM
Quote from: formulanone on February 21, 2021, 10:30:54 AM
Looking ahead...Routes numbered 477 and 479 are going to be tough ones to find. Kentucky seems to be the most logical place to get those.

PA 477 has an interchange with US 220 just north of I-80.  I am not sure this helps you out much though.

Wherever work sends me makes it possible...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on February 21, 2021, 11:23:11 AM
Quote from: formulanone on February 21, 2021, 10:30:54 AM
Looking ahead...Routes numbered 477 and 479 are going to be tough ones to find. Kentucky seems to be the most logical place to get those.
For a while, I thought there was an I-477 out there somewhere, but was then surprised at how few 3di I-77 have for a pretty long interstate.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on February 21, 2021, 06:31:45 PM
For me it will be quite hard to tackle the 80s and 90s, since for some of the numbers there are no roads in Spain for that number. In fact, I cannot think of any road numbered 87 (I've just found an 85, or more precisely, 085). However I still have to check provincial roads in Caceres (Extremadura, Western Spain), as they seem to be numbered sequentially and they run into three digits.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on February 21, 2021, 06:41:12 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on February 21, 2021, 06:31:45 PM
For me it will be quite hard to tackle the 80s and 90s, since for some of the numbers there are no roads in Spain for that number. In fact, I cannot think of any road numbered 87 (I've just found an 85, or more precisely, 085). However I still have to check provincial roads in Caceres (Extremadura, Western Spain), as they seem to be numbered sequentially and they run into three digits.

LĂ©vignac has a D87. Google Maps says it's about 4Ă‚Â½ hours from you.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on February 21, 2021, 10:55:42 PM
Quote from: formulanone on February 21, 2021, 10:30:54 AM
Looking ahead...Routes numbered 477 and 479 are going to be tough ones to find. Kentucky seems to be the most logical place to get those.

Louisiana has 477 and 479, both near Natchitoches.

By coincidence, I had planned to pass through that area last week, on a US 84 clinch tour ending in west Texas. That got postponed, for obvious reasons.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on February 22, 2021, 04:22:00 AM
Quote from: 1 on February 21, 2021, 06:41:12 PM
LĂ©vignac has a D87. Google Maps says it's about 4Ă‚Â½ hours from you.

And currently impossible to reach for me. As I'm confined to my province.

Doing more research I may have found a way to get that elusive 18. Forest Roads, in my province prefixed HF. While so far I haven't found a HF18 (there should be one, since they appear to be sequentially numbered and there's a HF29), the system has given me a 16 that both I remember I've been on and is currently numbered as such.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on February 24, 2021, 12:23:15 AM
The leapfrogging goes on.

My lowest un-driven route number is now 473. This after some travels in Louisiana and Mississippi in the last few days, where I found two routes I needed in a parish only one over from where I was heading anyway, and a bunch of signed (blue pentagons) 4xx county routes in northeastern MS.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Duke87 on February 24, 2021, 12:44:12 AM
If Rothman is going to keep updating the aggregate list, I suppose I should note my lowest is now 265 instead of 245.

Has been so since September 2019, but I haven't paid this thread mind since I first posted in it.

Of some interest might also be the full matrix of what I've got (for numbers under 1000):
(https://i.imgur.com/Y8RNzn1.png)

Caveat is that this only considers routes currently in active or preview systems on the TravelMapping site. Several holes in here would be filled if Texas FMs and/or unsigned routes in CT counted, but they don't (yet, for the former).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 24, 2021, 02:15:18 PM
Oscar will not be denied, even if it means driving around the rural South finding dinky 4xx county routes. :D






















oscar473
formulanone456
hbelkins334
corco329
HTM Duke325
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: andrepoiy on February 26, 2021, 07:55:19 PM
Ontario: Highway 2
Ontario Freeways: 418
US Routes: US Route 2
US Interstates: I-2
Quebec: Route 101
Quebec Autoroutes: A-5
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 26, 2021, 09:34:00 PM
Quote from: andrepoiy on February 26, 2021, 07:55:19 PM
Ontario: Highway 2
Ontario Freeways: 418
US Routes: US Route 2
US Interstates: I-2
Quebec: Route 101
Quebec Autoroutes: A-5

The way this works is you figure out your lowest number overall -- the lowest you haven't been on no matter what system you're counting.  It's by number, rather than by system.  You can see other people's lists in the thread to get the gist.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on February 27, 2021, 09:40:12 AM
We know it's at least 2, since he has implicitly said he has been on US 1.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 27, 2021, 05:56:30 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on February 27, 2021, 09:40:12 AM
We know it's at least 2, since he has implicitly said he has been on US 1.
Let the man speak for himself.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: andrepoiy on February 27, 2021, 07:29:57 PM
I have been on US 1, in multiple states as well.

I guess that means that my lowest number would 13 if you don't count systems lower than provincial/state level.

If you count everything, then it'll be 21.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on March 11, 2021, 11:25:24 AM
I did a search, but didn't find anything.  (I'm sure it's probably out there.)  What's the lowest number that doesn't exist anywhere in the U.S.? (I guess we can include other regions as well.  I'm just thinking what's the lowest that you CAN'T go on.)

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 11, 2021, 11:41:55 AM
Quote from: andrepoiy on February 27, 2021, 07:29:57 PM
I have been on US 1, in multiple states as well.

I guess that means that my lowest number would 13 if you don't count systems lower than provincial/state level.

If you count everything, then it'll be 21.
In here, you can consider whichever systems you want.  Other people may handle what they think a numbered road is differently, but you do whatever you want.

Just I need a single number to add you to the list.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 11, 2021, 11:43:30 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on March 11, 2021, 11:25:24 AM
I did a search, but didn't find anything.  (I'm sure it's probably out there.)  What's the lowest number that doesn't exist anywhere in the U.S.? (I guess we can include other regions as well.  I'm just thinking what's the lowest that you CAN'T go on.)

Chris
Given Texas or Kentucky, I'd imagine it's very, very high (in the thousands).

I think I'll be content when I hit a certain level.  Things get pretty sparse/stupid around 600.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on March 11, 2021, 11:44:21 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on March 11, 2021, 11:25:24 AM
I did a search, but didn't find anything.  (I'm sure it's probably out there.)  What's the lowest number that doesn't exist anywhere in the U.S.? (I guess we can include other regions as well.  I'm just thinking what's the lowest that you CAN'T go on.)

Well, the 1-2-3 road sign challenge thread is now up to 2661.  I can't recall if there was a number we HAD to go outside the USA for or not...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on March 11, 2021, 11:47:20 AM
If you don't count highways lower than state-level routes, then...

Quote from: formulanone on February 04, 2019, 09:44:38 AM
DeKalb County Road 1928, as of this morning:

(https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7916/46930326222_77634d17e9_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2ev5bXy)

The sign looks less ugly, but just as generic. Unlike Street View, it was located on the opposite side of the street.

Quote from: formulanone on February 06, 2019, 08:19:36 PM
It's been an honor to find what seems to be the only 1928-numbered sign in existence. :-P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on March 11, 2021, 12:13:07 PM
Looks like maybe 2704?  No FM roads and nothing in Kentucky.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on March 11, 2021, 12:13:50 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on March 11, 2021, 11:48:30 AM
Between TX (according to Wikipedia), KY, and LA, it appears the lowest is 3542.  Any of those out there?

For what class of road?  FM-1928 hasn't existed since the sixties, and KY-1928 was decommissioned in 2018.  As far as I know, LA-1928 isn't a thing either.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on March 11, 2021, 12:15:34 PM
Quote from: kphoger on March 11, 2021, 12:13:50 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on March 11, 2021, 11:48:30 AM
Between TX (according to Wikipedia), KY, and LA, it appears the lowest is 3542.  Any of those out there?

For what class of road?  FM-1928 hasn't existed since the sixties, and KY-1928 was decommissioned in 2018.  As far as I know, LA-1928 isn't a thing either.

I didn't realize the links on the FM wiki page includes former routes, so yeah, 1928 looks like a winner.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on March 11, 2021, 01:41:03 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on March 11, 2021, 12:15:34 PM
Quote from: kphoger on March 11, 2021, 12:13:50 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on March 11, 2021, 11:48:30 AM
Between TX (according to Wikipedia), KY, and LA, it appears the lowest is 3542.  Any of those out there?

For what class of road?  FM-1928 hasn't existed since the sixties, and KY-1928 was decommissioned in 2018.  As far as I know, LA-1928 isn't a thing either.

I didn't realize the links on the FM wiki page includes former routes, so yeah, 1928 looks like a winner.

Chris

There's probably an North Carolina "SR 1928" somewhere, but those are tougher to find.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on March 11, 2021, 01:51:26 PM
Quote from: formulanone on March 11, 2021, 01:41:03 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on March 11, 2021, 12:15:34 PM
Quote from: kphoger on March 11, 2021, 12:13:50 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on March 11, 2021, 11:48:30 AM
Between TX (according to Wikipedia), KY, and LA, it appears the lowest is 3542.  Any of those out there?

For what class of road?  FM-1928 hasn't existed since the sixties, and KY-1928 was decommissioned in 2018.  As far as I know, LA-1928 isn't a thing either.

I didn't realize the links on the FM wiki page includes former routes, so yeah, 1928 looks like a winner.

Chris

There's probably an North Carolina "SR 1928" somewhere, but those are tougher to find.

Looks like Jimmie Kerr Road in Haw River.  No shields anywhere though.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on March 11, 2021, 01:55:48 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on March 11, 2021, 01:51:26 PM
No shields anywhere though.

Are you only counting routes with shields?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on March 11, 2021, 02:19:04 PM
Quote from: kphoger on March 11, 2021, 01:55:48 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on March 11, 2021, 01:51:26 PM
No shields anywhere though.

Are you only counting routes with shields?

I guess we can have different classifications.  Signed only.  Signed and primary only.  Primary only.  Any GD shield you can find.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: HTM Duke on March 12, 2021, 03:54:45 PM
On my latest day trip yesterday, I knocked out the following:
CR-325 (Alachua County)
CR-339 (Levy / Gilchrist Counties)
CR-351 (Dixie / Lafayette Counties)

This now bumps me to 386.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 12, 2021, 10:24:40 PM
Counting county routes is for sissies...but the list tolerates them or whatever else one elects to include.






















oscar473
formulanone456
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: texaskdog on March 12, 2021, 10:40:42 PM
US highway 3 (been on 1 & 2)
Interstate 2 (even though it's in my state)(first one)
Texas state highway 3 (first one)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 12, 2021, 10:41:50 PM
Quote from: texaskdog on March 12, 2021, 10:40:42 PM
US highway 3 (been on 1 & 2)
Interstate 2 (even though it's in my state)(first one)
Texas state highway 3 (first one)
So...3?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: texaskdog on March 12, 2021, 10:50:42 PM
oh got it
first ones i think of...wont count county roads i guess
I'm up to 42 for sure....
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 12, 2021, 10:52:00 PM
Quote from: texaskdog on March 12, 2021, 10:50:42 PM
oh got it
first ones i think of...wont count county roads i guess
I'm up to 42 for sure....
You can count county routes if you'd like.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ran4sh on March 12, 2021, 11:29:45 PM
For me the answer seems to be 32.

For route numbers less than 32, I've been on:
* Georgia routes 1-31 except 4, 21, 25, 27, 30
* I- 4, 30 (and others)
* US 21, 25, 27 (and others)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: texaskdog on March 13, 2021, 04:39:07 PM
I think I figured it out  I don't think I've ever been on a highway 42 (state or higher).  I may have been on Minnesota or Wisconsin 42 but I don't think so.  County yes but state, us, interstate, might be 42.

42
68
74
82
91
92
93
99
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: thspfc on March 13, 2021, 04:49:05 PM
Alright, I have come to the realization that I have driven a 1. US-1 in Florida fills that hole for me. So my new answer is, drumroll please, 3. Making progress here.  :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 13, 2021, 10:13:39 PM
Everyone is a dirty cheater.  Except me.























oscar473
formulanone456
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
dfilpus149
Jim139
csw132
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: csw on March 20, 2021, 10:55:33 PM
I've hit a 132, 133, and 137 in the past few months. Bump me up to 153.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 20, 2021, 11:40:24 PM























oscar473
formulanone456
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
csw153
dfilpus149
Jim139
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on March 21, 2021, 01:32:18 AM
As far as I can tell, the only 25 I've touched is US-25W, so if that doesn't count (I think it should, since there is no unsuffixed 25 in that area), 25 is my answer. If that does count for 25, my answer is 38 (crossed over a bunch of 38s, it looks like, but they were all clean crosses with no concurrency).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on March 21, 2021, 09:51:05 AM
Quote from: Rothman on March 13, 2021, 10:13:39 PM
Everyone is a dirty cheater.  Except me.

Hey! My wife just says I just don't listen too good. Or something.

I'm still stuck on 456, though. I'm no longer on the county-route bandwagon (until I hit 486 or a bit higher.)

It's tempting to just pick up dozens of half-mile Cullman County Roads, but that's no fair to anyone else, except for a handful of our membership. They're a bunch of dead-end routes that mostly just go to a few homes.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 21, 2021, 10:01:53 AM


Quote from: formulanone on March 21, 2021, 09:51:05 AM
Quote from: Rothman on March 13, 2021, 10:13:39 PM
Everyone is a dirty cheater.  Except me.

Hey! My wife just says I just don't listen too good. Or something.


:D :D :D

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on March 27, 2021, 04:08:55 AM
I just went to go clinch OK-38 as a result of this thread. That bumps me up to 84.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 27, 2021, 02:55:57 PM
























oscar473
formulanone456
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain159
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
csw153
dfilpus149
Jim139
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Scott511484
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
Caps8194321
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
ftballfan16
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ftballfan on March 27, 2021, 08:32:04 PM
I took GA 16 yesterday as part of a way to get around traffic on I-75, so my lowest is now 26
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Caps81943 on March 31, 2021, 12:28:20 AM
Got TX-21 recently, and randomly remembered that I have indeed been on  a very short portion of WI-54. While I'm not certain about which 61 I've been on, I know it's either US-61 or US-61 BUS, so I know I've been on a 61. All in all, my new lowest number is now 82.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: LilianaUwU on March 31, 2021, 04:19:52 AM
I don't recall having been on an highway 3 before, but I've been on TCH 1 and 2 before.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: plain on March 31, 2021, 02:48:05 PM
Almost forgot, I managed to get a small piece of MD 159 a few weeks ago (Old Philadelphia Rd). I'm now up to 174. There's one in Martinsville, VA but I don't go that way very often, so I'll probably have to rely on Maryland again for that.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 31, 2021, 08:35:46 PM
Updated.


























oscar473
formulanone456
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain174
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
csw153
dfilpus149
Jim139
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Scott511484
Caps8194382
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on April 01, 2021, 06:48:10 PM
I clinched OK-84 while on the way back from getting my covid shot yesterday. So that puts me at 93.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: A.J. Bertin on April 12, 2021, 02:30:07 PM
My friend Paul and I were discussing this topic this weekend.  I think the lowest-numbered route I haven't been on is 107.  I almost said 98 but then discovered that I'd been on a brief stretch of U.S. 98 in Florida that's duplexed with FL-60.

I will say that Michigan used to have a state highway numbered M-107, and I had driven on it, but that route was decommissioned at some point over the past 10 years or so... so I feel as if I need to find another route 107 somewhere in order for me to be able to count it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on April 12, 2021, 02:45:00 PM
I'd go ahead and count the 107 if I were you. At the time, you were on a numbered route, and the number it carried was 107, even if it no longer carries that number. But that's up to you, of course.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on April 12, 2021, 02:47:57 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on April 12, 2021, 02:45:00 PM
I'd go ahead and count the 107 if I were you. At the time, you were on a numbered route, and the number it carried was 107, even if it no longer carries that number. But that's up to you, of course.

Agreed.  I'm counting 666 (obviously I'm not that high yet) since I drove US666 when it was still signed as such.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 12, 2021, 03:34:27 PM
























oscar473
formulanone456
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain174
hockeyjohn154
paulthemapguy153
csw153
dfilpus149
Jim139
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
A.J. Bertin107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on April 12, 2021, 04:24:36 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on April 12, 2021, 02:45:00 PM
I'd go ahead and count the 107 if I were you. At the time, you were on a numbered route, and the number it carried was 107, even if it no longer carries that number. But that's up to you, of course.

I also concur. I used to claim 16 from a route I traveled as a toddler which no longer has that number, before finding out another road that both carries that number currently and I remember I've been on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on April 12, 2021, 04:30:09 PM
Quote from: A.J. Bertin on April 12, 2021, 02:30:07 PM
My friend Paul and I were discussing this topic this weekend.  I think the lowest-numbered route I haven't been on is 107.  I almost said 98 but then discovered that I'd been on a brief stretch of U.S. 98 in Florida that's duplexed with FL-60.

I will say that Michigan used to have a state highway numbered M-107, and I had driven on it, but that route was decommissioned at some point over the past 10 years or so... so I feel as if I need to find another route 107 somewhere in order for me to be able to count it.

M=107 was in the NW corner of the UP and was decommissioned in 2008. If you're certain you were on it you should definitely count it. If not, there's an OH 107 in the NW corner of Ohio, so not too far away. 107 happens to be my lowest missing number as well and at some point I'll get around to getting OH 107 (and OH 108 which is near 107). Once I hit those, I will be counting the since-decommissioned IN 112 as I know for certain I drove it while it was still signed.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Big John on April 12, 2021, 05:44:27 PM
I can't find a 46 in my travels.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on April 12, 2021, 10:08:00 PM
Quote from: A.J. Bertin on April 12, 2021, 02:30:07 PM
My friend Paul and I were discussing this topic this weekend.  I think the lowest-numbered route I haven't been on is 107.  I almost said 98 but then discovered that I'd been on a brief stretch of U.S. 98 in Florida that's duplexed with FL-60.

I will say that Michigan used to have a state highway numbered M-107, and I had driven on it, but that route was decommissioned at some point over the past 10 years or so... so I feel as if I need to find another route 107 somewhere in order for me to be able to count it.

A.J., like the others before me I would go ahead and count it.  You can truthfully say, "I have in the past driven on a road with the number 107".  Not your fault is was decommissioned.

I had that same issue with 46. I then realized that on numerous occasions in the 1980s I had driven what is now I-195 into BWI Airport, which was numbered MD 46 at the time.

Although I am planning a trip to catch MD 135 (my lowest untraveled) - and since part of WV 46 parallels part of MD 135 (opposite side of Potomac River), I may just grab it and remove any doubt.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 12, 2021, 11:57:49 PM
Nah.  You guys should have to run around reclinching stuff.

Reminds me of the I-94/I-41 duplex.  I have clinched I-94, but not I-41. :/
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on April 13, 2021, 01:24:43 AM
Quote from: Rothman on April 12, 2021, 11:57:49 PM
Nah.  You guys should have to run around reclinching stuff.

sounds boring
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on April 13, 2021, 02:51:42 PM
Quote from: A.J. Bertin on April 12, 2021, 02:30:07 PM
My friend Paul and I were discussing this topic this weekend.  I think the lowest-numbered route I haven't been on is 107.  I almost said 98 but then discovered that I'd been on a brief stretch of U.S. 98 in Florida that's duplexed with FL-60.

I will say that Michigan used to have a state highway numbered M-107, and I had driven on it, but that route was decommissioned at some point over the past 10 years or so... so I feel as if I need to find another route 107 somewhere in order for me to be able to count it.

By the way, on that trip, we drove on a section of M-153, so my new number is 168.  :)  I have like 5 other numbers missing below 200.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 13, 2021, 06:50:52 PM
























oscar473
formulanone456
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain174
paulthemapguy168
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
Jim139
Thing 342127
dlsterner125
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
A.J. Bertin107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: A.J. Bertin on April 13, 2021, 09:24:43 PM
I actually think I'm going to follow the advice that a few other folks shared and acknowledge 107 as a route number I've driven.  Even though M-107 is no longer a highway in Michigan, I did drive it when it was current.  The number I'm going to go with is 148.  In looking through my travels, I don't think I've ever driven any route 148.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on April 13, 2021, 09:30:56 PM
Quote from: A.J. Bertin on April 13, 2021, 09:24:43 PM
I actually think I'm going to follow the advice that a few other folks shared and acknowledge 107 as a route number I've driven.  Even though M-107 is no longer a highway in Michigan, I did drive it when it was current.  The number I'm going to go with is 148.  In looking through my travels, I don't think I've ever driven any route 148.

Funny to me.  For just under two years, I probably came close to being on IL-148 every single day.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on April 21, 2021, 11:29:53 PM
From travels the last three days through central Mississippi and northern Louisiana, the lowest-numbered route I haven't been on is now up to 511. Both of those areas are treasure troves of state routes in the high 400s.

I'm unlikely to pick up a 511 soon, so my count will stay as is for awhile. The state I'm in and the next one (Texas and New Mexico) have 511s, but too much of a detour from my current itinerary. Most likely next chance for me to snag a 511 on a future trip will be in northern Ohio.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on April 22, 2021, 12:10:05 AM
The lowest numbered route that I haven't been on has increased from 125 to 135.

I do have a road trip planned to get MD 135 in western Maryland in the near future, leaving the next target at 142.  That one may take a while, since to the best of my knowledge, the nearest one is VA 142 in Petersburg - a bit far to go without having another purpose for the trip.

And it looks like oscar is getting serious about pulling away from everybody!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 22, 2021, 01:03:54 AM
Quote from: oscar on April 21, 2021, 11:29:53 PM
From travels the last three days through central Mississippi and northern Louisiana, the lowest-numbered route I haven't been on is now up to 511. Both of those areas are treasure troves of state routes in the high 400s.

I'm unlikely to pick up a 511 soon, so my count will stay as is for awhile. The state I'm in and the next one (Texas and New Mexico) have 511s, but too much of a detour from my current itinerary. Most likely next chance for me to snag a 511 on a future trip will be in northern Ohio.
Itinerary?  What goals does this itinerary fulfill?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on April 22, 2021, 11:40:44 AM
Quote from: oscar on April 21, 2021, 11:29:53 PM
From travels the last three days through central Mississippi and northern Louisiana, the lowest-numbered route I haven't been on is now up to 511. Both of those areas are treasure troves of state routes in the high 400s.

I'm unlikely to pick up a 511 soon, so my count will stay as is for awhile. The state I'm in and the next one (Texas and New Mexico) have 511s, but too much of a detour from my current itinerary. Most likely next chance for me to snag a 511 on a future trip will be in northern Ohio.

If you are passing anywhere near the Kentucky-Tennessee border along or close to I-75, then you could snag KY 511. It's located in Whitley County and runs between KY 26 and US 25W, with a bridge that crosses I-75. If your trip home takes you along I-40, then detour via I-75, exit at Williamsburg, re-enter I-75 at Corbin, and head back home via I-64, I-79, and Corridor H.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on April 22, 2021, 04:16:52 PM
Quote from: kphoger on April 13, 2021, 09:30:56 PM
Funny to me.  For just under two years, I probably came close to being on IL-148 every single day.

That's the kinda funny thing about this game. There are few people here who have never been on a 9, and yet I'm on 9 half the time I leave the house. Likewise, I'm sure there are some folks from the northeast who scoff at me for having never been on a 93.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 22, 2021, 04:41:29 PM
Step up your game, people.  Can't let Oscar have all the pedestals.

























oscar511
formulanone456
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain174
paulthemapguy168
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Evan_Th on April 22, 2021, 05:05:08 PM
Talking about people upping their game...  I was planning a road trip late last fall that'd take me to a Highway 28, but it got cancelled due to the Situation and impending winter weather.

There's still a Washington 28 two and a half hours away, but that's a little far for me to go without another reason for the trip.  A few weeks ago I was thinking of heading that way for the vaccine, but then I found an appointment a lot closer.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on April 22, 2021, 06:21:42 PM
Quote from: oscar on April 21, 2021, 11:29:53 PM
From travels the last three days through central Mississippi and northern Louisiana, the lowest-numbered route I haven't been on is now up to 511. Both of those areas are treasure troves of state routes in the high 400s.

Quote from: Rothman on April 22, 2021, 04:41:29 PM
Step up your game, people.  Can't let Oscar have all the pedestals.

I'll need 456, 477, 479, 499, and 504 to surpass Oscar...so it will be a while! By then, he might be comfortably in the 600s.

After all, he has roughly pi times more mileage than me on Travel Mapping...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on April 22, 2021, 06:23:34 PM
Last I checked though, mapcat still had the throne on TravelMapping. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on April 22, 2021, 06:24:34 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on April 22, 2021, 06:23:34 PM
Last I checked though, mapcat still had the throne on TravelMapping. :D

I have to count Preview+Active, since my state is in there.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on April 22, 2021, 07:34:25 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on April 22, 2021, 06:23:34 PM
Last I checked though, mapcat still had the throne on TravelMapping. :D

Oscar is beating mapcat in "Preview+Active" at the moment. (https://travelmapping.net/stat.php?u=null&units=miles)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on April 22, 2021, 07:40:06 PM
Quote from: Evan_Th on April 22, 2021, 05:05:08 PM
Talking about people upping their game...  I was planning a road trip late last fall that'd take me to a Highway 28, but it got cancelled due to the Situation and impending winter weather.

Why did this guy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Sorrentino) cause you to cancel your trip?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 22, 2021, 07:44:13 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on April 22, 2021, 07:40:06 PM
Quote from: Evan_Th on April 22, 2021, 05:05:08 PM
Talking about people upping their game...  I was planning a road trip late last fall that'd take me to a Highway 28, but it got cancelled due to the Situation and impending winter weather.

Why did this guy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Sorrentino) cause you to cancel your trip?
Well-played.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on April 23, 2021, 11:19:02 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on April 22, 2021, 07:34:25 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on April 22, 2021, 06:23:34 PM
Last I checked though, mapcat still had the throne on TravelMapping. :D

Oscar is beating mapcat in "Preview+Active" at the moment. (https://travelmapping.net/stat.php?u=null&units=miles)

Emphasis on "at the moment".

At one point last year, just after one of my systems was promoted from "preview" to "active", I was very close to mapcat's active-system mileage. Since then, he has added mileage much faster than I have. At that pace, he might soon overtake me in Preview+Active.

Other users have me killed in European systems and others outside the U.S. and Canada. Travel Mapping provides ample opportunities for competitive people to claim the top spot on something.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on April 24, 2021, 02:22:09 AM
Quote from: oscar on April 23, 2021, 11:19:02 PM
Travel Mapping provides ample opportunities for competitive people to claim the top spot on something.

Indeed. I was pretty pleased to see that, having gotten my file up-to-date, I am in 2nd place in Oklahoma. There's only one guy ahead of me...and he just moved back to Oklahoma, so I am probably never gonna catch up. :P

By the way, Oscar, I just looked at your Oklahoma travels because I was curious where you stood on them, and I think you may have inadvertently not given yourself credit for the tolled portion of the Chickasaw Turnpike.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: rel4 on April 24, 2021, 03:19:41 AM
My lowest route number I haven't been on is 170 followed by 179, 194, 196, and 199.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on April 24, 2021, 12:37:42 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on April 24, 2021, 02:22:09 AM
Quote from: oscar on April 23, 2021, 11:19:02 PM
Travel Mapping provides ample opportunities for competitive people to claim the top spot on something.

Indeed. I was pretty pleased to see that, having gotten my file up-to-date, I am in 2nd place in Oklahoma. There's only one guy ahead of me...and he just moved back to Oklahoma, so I am probably never gonna catch up. :P

Unfortunately my quest to be the first to 100% MN was dashed by some dude who I don't think is a member of this board. I'm still working on it, but at a slower pace than maybe I would have before. Dude kind of came out of nowhere too and suddenly shot up the leaderboard until I saw all he had left was Rock County's mileage, which he quickly also completed.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on April 24, 2021, 01:19:03 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on April 24, 2021, 12:37:42 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on April 24, 2021, 02:22:09 AM
Quote from: oscar on April 23, 2021, 11:19:02 PM
Travel Mapping provides ample opportunities for competitive people to claim the top spot on something.

Indeed. I was pretty pleased to see that, having gotten my file up-to-date, I am in 2nd place in Oklahoma. There's only one guy ahead of me...and he just moved back to Oklahoma, so I am probably never gonna catch up. :P

Unfortunately my quest to be the first to 100% MN was dashed by some dude who I don't think is a member of this board. I'm still working on it, but at a slower pace than maybe I would have before. Dude kind of came out of nowhere too and suddenly shot up the leaderboard until I saw all he had left was Rock County's mileage, which he quickly also completed.

I'm assuming I'll be the first to 100% in Colorado, although Corco, who posts here but doesn't log his miles on Travel Mapping to my knowledge, has it in his sights too.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on April 24, 2021, 01:50:33 PM
Quote from: oscar on April 23, 2021, 11:19:02 PM
Travel Mapping provides ample opportunities for competitive people to claim the top spot on something.

Well, I do have the top spot for interstates in MD, DE, DC, VA, WV ... yeah in about a 100-way tie for first place   :bigass:

My best chance might be either DC, Maryland, or Delaware ... I'm sure I wouldn't be the first to the top.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 24, 2021, 05:29:11 PM
As with mob-rule, I wonder if all who are using Travel Mapping are using it to track their own travels specifically.  That can cause some quirks in the data if not all are in on the "competition."

And, as has been pointed out by county clinchers and others many times, if someone lies about their travels, that's more on them than anyone.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on April 24, 2021, 10:19:27 PM
If I participated in Travel Mapping, I have no doubt I'd have first place in West Virginia (having clinched the entire primary system, including various unsigned ALT routes) and in Kentucky as well.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on April 25, 2021, 12:22:19 AM
Quote from: Rothman on April 24, 2021, 05:29:11 PM
As with mob-rule, I wonder if all who are using Travel Mapping are using it to track their own travels specifically.  That can cause some quirks in the data if not all are in on the "competition."

And, as has been pointed out by county clinchers and others many times, if someone lies about their travels, that's more on them than anyone.

I remember a long time ago I showed mob-rule to some Internet friend who wasn't a roadgeek. They thought it was pretty cool and started an account there and showed it to me. To my chagrin they had a color for "Places I want to go some day" or something like that. I pointed out that a lot of the extra features of the site assumed that every marked county was actually visited, so it made the data inaccurate whenever they used it that way. They basically said they didn't care and as far as I know never changed it.

That, and there are a lot of people on mob-rule with joint husband-and-wife accounts, multiple accounts for specific purposes (like Oscar's "second round" map), people using it as a general county-map-generating service for purposes not tied to their own travel, and so on, that means mob-rule data needs to be taken with a grain of kosher salt (a grain of table salt is small enough it just won't do).

I would expect Travel Mapping to be somewhat more accurate because building a .list file is enough of a pain in the butt that most people won't bother going through the trouble in order to use it as a general mapping service, or to keep track of anything but actual highway travels.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on April 25, 2021, 09:46:48 AM
I saw Travel Mapping as a little tedious at first, adding up route segments for about an hour a day for roughly six months. If you log these routes on a map or keep good written/photographic records, it's a little easier. Of course, your time spent might vary on how much lifetime mileage you've accumulated (I think I had about 65-70k miles, to put the time into perspective). It is a little easier now that multi-state Interstate and US Routes can be included in one go, as well as easier to cut-and-paste routes.

After that, it takes me only 5-10 minutes after taking a trip. Once in a while, there's edits which break up, add, or dissolve routes, but everything's logged somewhere as a warning. If starting out, I would highly recommend just submitting a few routes to make you understand how it's done, otherwise you wind up with a lot of re-editing. Then just climb the ranks or marvel at your maps.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 25, 2021, 09:58:23 AM
"Now, must remember, how long's a rel?"

























oscar511
formulanone456
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
plain174
rel4170
paulthemapguy168
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on April 26, 2021, 09:54:12 PM
I just got home from a trip, during which I drove on PA-168, VA-174, OH-187, and VA-195.  I think that leaves 175 as the only remaining number below 200 that I haven't driven on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: deathtopumpkins on April 28, 2021, 11:35:47 AM
Quote from: formulanone on April 25, 2021, 09:46:48 AMIt is a little easier now that multi-state Interstate and US Routes can be included in one go, as well as easier to cut-and-paste routes.

Wait what changed in this regard? Did I miss something about a change to .list formatting?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 28, 2021, 12:21:37 PM
Updated.

























oscar511
formulanone456
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
US 8946
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on April 28, 2021, 12:54:29 PM
Quote from: deathtopumpkins on April 28, 2021, 11:35:47 AM
Quote from: formulanone on April 25, 2021, 09:46:48 AMIt is a little easier now that multi-state Interstate and US Routes can be included in one go, as well as easier to cut-and-paste routes.

Wait what changed in this regard? Did I miss something about a change to .list formatting?

See here (https://travelmapping.net/participate.php?units=miles&u=null&).  The allowable new formats (copy-paste and multi-region option) are marked with "NEW!" highlights.  Since there is no requirement to use the multi-region option, these changes do not directly affect your existing list file.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on April 28, 2021, 01:16:03 PM
Picked up PA 456 and PA 477, so 479 is now my lowest un-driven route number.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on May 03, 2021, 01:17:52 AM
I drove part of AL 46 today. The only 47 I've been on is NM 47, but the part I was on is no longer NM 47 (though it was at the time).

Not sure if that still counts as a valid 47 travel. If it does (and in my opinion it should), my lowest untraveled number is now 57.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 03, 2021, 08:11:35 PM
Updated.  Operation: Get Oscar seems to be going well.

Also updated US 89's to 57, since he wants to count nonexistent routes. :D


























oscar511
formulanone479
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
US 8957
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
CoreySamson2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on May 22, 2021, 05:00:00 PM
So today I went out and drove on County Road 2 (Brazoria) out in Danciger, TX (https://www.google.com/maps/@29.1727196,-95.8187193,17.22z). That brings my lowest traveled number up to 9. I think counting county routes for this is acceptable as long as the number is signed (in this case, it was, and I took a picture if you need verification that it is). But it appears CR 9 is not signed, so I probably might be stuck on 9 for a while.

I might have a chance to nab OK-9 when I'm going to do a college visit in Tulsa sometime this summer, but that's the only one that looks even feasible to travel to for right now.

Summary so far up to 50:
1: LA, TN, TX NASA   2: CR (Brazoria, TX)   3: TX   4: IH   5: IH   6: TX   7: AR   8: IH, TX Beltway   9: none   10: IH
11: AR   12: IH   13: AR   14: none   15: TN   16: none   17: none   18: none   19: LA   20: IH
21: TX   22: none   23: none   24: none   25: none   26: none   27: none   28: none   29: none   30: IH
31: none   32: none   33: none   34: none   35: IH, TX, TX BUS  36: TX   37: IH   38: none   39: none   40: IH
41: none   42: LA  43: TX   44: CR (Brazoria, TX)   45: IH   46: none   47: none   48: CR (Brazoria, TX)   49: IH   50: none
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 22, 2021, 05:30:03 PM
Congrats to Corey for moving up a rung or two on the ladder.



























oscar511
formulanone479
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
US 8957
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SGwithADD on June 02, 2021, 12:45:58 PM
Getting a chance to update this. The lowest number I haven't been on now is 112:

US 1, WV 2, NJ 3, RI 4, NY 5, US 6, NY 7, NY 8, US 9, NY 10, US 11, NY 12, NY 13, NY 14, NY 15, NY 16, NY 17, PA 18, US 19, US 20, NJ 21, US 22, PA 23, NJ 24, NY 25, NY 26, NY 27, PA 28, PA 29, NY 30, NJ 31, NY 32, NY 33, NY 34, I-35, PA 36, I-37, NY 38, NY 39, US 40, NY 41, NY 42, PA 43, US 44, I-45, US 46, MD 47, PA 48, PA 49, US 50, PA 51, NY 52, PA 53, NY 54, NY 55, PA 56, I-57, MD 58, US 59, PA 60, PA 61, US 62, NY 63, I-64, PA 65, PA 66, NY 67, I-68, I-69, I-70, TX 71, I-72, PA 73, I-74, I-75, I-76, I-77, I-78, I-79, I-80, I-81, NJ 82, I-83, I-84, NY 85, I-86, I-87, I-88, NY 89, I-90, NY 91, PA 92, I-93, I-94, I-95, I-96, I-97, NY 98, I-99, NY 100, US 101, PA 102, MD 103, NY 104, WV 105, NY 106, NY 107, NY 108, NJ 109, I-110, TX Loop 111

Keeping this for future reference for myself: RI 114, NY 116, RI 117, US 119, PA 120, PA 121, IL 122, VA 123, NJ 124, RI 126, WV 127, PA 128, PA 130, VA 132, VA 134, NY 135, PA 136, RI 138, NJ 139, MD 140, VA 143, NY 144, PA 145, RI 146, PA 147, PA 148, US 150, PA 151, NY 153, PA 154, PA 155, PA 156, PA 160
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 03, 2021, 07:13:49 PM
And up SGwithADD goes...




























oscar511
formulanone479
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
deathtopumpkins188
Hot Rod Hootenanny184
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
US 8957
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on June 05, 2021, 06:54:21 PM
Got bored earlier this afternoon, so I drove to Findlay and clinched OH 186.
My lowest number is now 192.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on June 06, 2021, 02:46:55 AM
I need to get out to John Day to snag 48. I just never have the energy to do so.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 07, 2021, 11:31:00 PM
Actually had Hot Rod at 184 and he said he clinched 186 and is now 192 (Protip: Disney World).  But, I'm no one to argue.

Bickendan's moanings duly ignored. :D





























oscar511
formulanone479
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Konza193
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
US 8957
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadgeekteen on June 07, 2021, 11:56:01 PM
There are people who have never been on a route 1? Dang.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on June 08, 2021, 09:47:18 AM
Quote from: Roadgeekteen on June 07, 2021, 11:56:01 PM
There are people who have never been on a route 1? Dang.

I do not know of many out west with the exception of CA 1.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on June 08, 2021, 12:41:44 PM
Logging this more as a reminder to myself which highways I need to get to move up the list. I drove a bunch in SE Wyoming that eliminated some undriven numbers, but to close the gap, I'm still missing:

203 - New Mexico seems easiest if I do a county clinching trip down there (Or if I'm in Ogden, I can get UT203)
204 - Easy to grab NM segment
226 - Utah seems easy if I grab 203 there, or maybe in Oregon when visiting my brother and sister-in-law
245 - No real obvious choices.  One in New Mexico down by Clovis.
247 - New Mexico probably best
249 - Either New Mexico or next time I drive to KC, catch the KS version
252 - Casper trip upcoming it looks like
253 - Casper trip upcoming it looks like
256 - Casper trip upcoming it looks like
258 - Casper trip upcoming it looks like

I will catch up!

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on June 08, 2021, 12:55:12 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on June 08, 2021, 09:47:18 AM
Quote from: Roadgeekteen on June 07, 2021, 11:56:01 PM
There are people who have never been on a route 1? Dang.

I do not know of many out west with the exception of CA 1.

West of the Great Plains, you basically have:
AK1 - Tough to get to Alaska, but if you're there, easy to get AK1
CA1 - PCH
CO1 - Unexciting road in Fort Collins
ID1 - Way up in the panhandle
MT1 - Scenic route in western Montana that doesn't really serve any cities
NM1 - Glorified frontage road by Socorro

Nothing in NV, OR, UT, WA, WY

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on June 09, 2021, 01:58:34 AM
Oregon has ORH 1, which is I-5.
Technicality, to be sure, and wholly up to whomever on whether they include it or not, but yes, Oregon does have a Highway 1.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on June 09, 2021, 02:14:21 AM
Update time! (still haven't added 48 yet):
0: CZE D0, HUN M0, BEL R0
1: ASIA AH1, AUT A1, CHE A1, CZE D1, DEU A3, B1, ENG A1, FRA A1, HUN M1, F1, SVK D1, CAN TCH/BC 1, USA CA 1, ND 1, ORH 1
2: AUT A2, CHE A2, CZE D2, DEU B2r, ENG A2, HUN M2, F2, IND NH 2 (former, still signed), 2B (former, still signed), WB 2, NLD A2, SVK D2, USA US 2, CA 2, MO 2, ORH 2
3: BEL A3, CHE A3, FRA A3, HUN F3, USA MN 3, ND 3, ORH 3
4: ENG M4, A4, FRA A4, HUN F4, ITA A4, SVK D4, USA CA 4, WA 4, ORH 4
5: AUT A4, CAN ON 5, FRA A5, N5, USA I-5, US 5, MN 5, ORH 5
6: CAN ON 6, FRA A6, N6, USA US 6, MN 6, OR 6, WA 6, ORH 6
7: CZE D7, DEU A7, HUN M7, IND WB 7, USA US 7, MO 7, NY 7, WA 7, ORH 7
8: AUT A8, DEU A8, IND WB 8, USA NY 8, OR 8
9: CHE A9, DEU A9, USA US 9, NY 9N, ORH 9
10: HUN F10, USA I-10, US 10, OR 10, ORH 10
11: CZE D11, BEL R11, USA OR 11
12: AUT A12, BEL A12, IND NH 12, USA I-12, US 12, VT 12
13: AUT A13, CHE A13, IND WB 13, USA MN 13, WI 13
14: AUT A14, IND WB 14, USA US 14, CA 14T, WA 14, VT 14, ORH 14
15: EUR E15, USA I-15, CO 15, CT 15, MN 15, VT 15, ORH 15
16: AUT S16, USA CA 16, MN 16, WI 16, ORH 16
17: USA CO 17, NM 17, VT 17, ORH 17
18: USA US 18, CA 18, OR 18, ORH 18
19: EUR E19, HUN M19, IND NH 19, USA MN 19, OR 19
20: ENG M20, A20, BEL R20, USA I-20, US 20, MN 20, ORH 20
21: AUT A21, BEL R21, USA ID 21, MN 21, ORH 21
22: ITA A22, USA CA 22, CT 22 NY 22, OR 22, VT 22A, ORH 22
23: EUR E23, AUT A23, USA US 23, CA 23, MN 23, WI 23
24: CAN ON 24, USA US 24, CA 24, MN 24
25: EUR E25, AUT A25, BEL A25, ENG M25, USA I-25, ID 25, MN 25, ORH 25
26: FRA A26, USA US 26, MI 26, ORH 26
27: EUR E27, BEL A27, USA IA 27, MN 27, OR 27, ORH 27
28: USA MI 28
29: USA I-29, NY 29, ORH 29
30: USA US 30, MN 30, WI 30, UT 30, ORH 30
31: FRA A31, USA ORH 31
32: USA NY 32, ORH 32
33: USA CA 33, ORH 33
34: EUR E34, USA MN 34, OR 34, SD 34
35: EUR E35, CZE D35, USA OR 35, WI 35, ORH 35
36: USA CA 36, OR 36
37: USA OR 37, SD 37T, ORH 37
38: USA CA 39, MI 38, OR 38, ORH 38
39: FRA A39, USA CA 39, OR 39, ORH 39
40: EUR E40, ENG A40, USA I-40, US 40, ORH 40
41: EUR E41, USA US 41, ORH 41
42: EUR E42, USA OR 42
43: EUR E43, USA MN 43, MO 43, OR 43, ORH 43
44: EUR E44, USA I-44, US 44, CA 44, MN 44, SD 44
45: EUR E45, USA I-45, US 45, SD 45, ORH 45
46: USA CA 46, OR 46, ORH 46
47: USA MN 47, OR 47, ORH 47
48: <- Lowest highway number not traveled. Closest instance: ORH 48 (US 395), John Day to Burns
49: USA I-49, US 49
50: USA US 50, MN 50, NY 50, WY 50, ORH 50
51: USA US 51, MN 51, OR 51, ORH 51
52: EUR E52, USA US 52, MO 52
53: USA US 53, OR 53, ORH 53
54: EUR E54
55: EUR E55, USA I-55, CA 55, ID 55, MI 55, MN 55
56: EUR E56, USA US 56, MN 56, WI 56
57: ITA A57, USA CA 57, MN 57
58: EUR E58, NLD A58, USA CA 58, OR 58, ORH 58
59: EUR E59, NLD A59, USA US 59, MO 59, WY 59
60: EUR E60, USA US 60, CA 60, MN 60, WI 60
61: USA US 61, ORH 61
62: EUR E62, USA US 62, MN 62, OR 62
63: USA US 63, SD 63, ORH 63
64: USA US 64, AZ 64, MI 64, MN 64, ORH 64
65: EUR E65, USA US 65, MN 65
66: USA CA 66, MO 66, OR 66, ORH 66
67: EUR E67, USA US 67, NY 67, ORH 67
68: USA CA 68, MN 68, NM 68, ORH 68
69: USA I-69, US 69, ORH 69
70: EUR E70, USA I-70, US 70, ORH 70
71: EUR E71, USA US 71, CA 71
72: USA ORH 72
73: USA CA 73, MN 73
74: USA NM 74, NY 74
75: EUR E75, USA I-75, US 75
76: USA MN 76
77: USA MI 77, MN 77
78: USA WI 78
79: USA SD 79
80: USA I-80, US 80, MN 80
81: <- Runner up
82: USA OR 82, WI 82
83: FRA N83, USA US 83, CA 83
84: USA I-84, US 84, CA 84
85: USA US 85
86: FRA A86, USA MO 86
87: USA I-87, US 87, MN 87, SD 87
88: <- Third place
89: USA I-89, US 89, CA 89, SD 89
90: USA I-90, US 90, CA 90
91: CAN BC 91, USA I-91, CA 91, ORH 91
92: USA UT 92, ORH 92
93: USA US 93, ORH 93
94: USA I-94, MI 94
95: DEU A95, USA I-95, US 95, MN 95
96: DEU A96, USA US 96
97: USA US 97
98: USA US 98
99: CAN BC 99, DEU 99, USA CA 99, OR99, WA 99
100: ENG A100, USA MN 100, WA 100, VT 100, ORH 100
101: USA US 101
102: USA ORH 102
103: USA OR 103, WA 103, ORH 103
104: FRA N104, USA OR 104, WA 104, ORH 104
105: USA I-105, MN 105, WA 105, ORH 105
106: no entry
107: USA WA 107, VT 107
108: USA VT 108
109: no entry
110: USA I-110, CA 110, MN 110, WY 110, ORH 110
111: no entry
112: USA CO 112
113: USA CA 113, USA WI 113
114: IND NH 114
115: USA I-115
116: IND NH 116A
117: no entry
118: USA CA 118
119: no entry
120: USA CA 120, OR 120, WY 120, ORH 120
121-122: no entries
123: USA MI 123, ORH 123
124-125: no entries
126: USA OR 126
127-129: no entries
130: USA OR 130, WI 130, ORH 130
131: USA OR 131, WI 131, ORH 131
132-133: no entries
134: USA CA 134
135-137: no entries
138: USA OR 138, ORH 138
139: USA CA 139, MN 139
140: USA OR 140, ORH 140
141: USA OR 141, WA 141, ORH 141
142: USA CO 142, ORH 142
143: USA ORH 143
144: USA ORH 144
145: no entry
146: USA UT 146
147-148: no entries
149: USA MN 149, NY 149
150: USA ORH 150
151: USA US 151, ORH 151
152: no entry
153: USA OR 153, ORH 153
154: USA OR 154, ORH 154
155: USA ORH 155
156: no entry
157: USA ORH 157
158: no entry
159: USA CO 159
160: USA US 160, IA 160, ORH 160
161: USA WA 161, ORH 161
162: USA WI 162, ORH 162
163: USA ORH 163
164: USA OR 164, ORH 164
165: USA US 165
166: no entry
167: USA WA 167
168: no entry
169: USA US 169, CA 169
170: USA CA 170
171: USA ORH 171
172: USA NV 172
173: USA CA 173, OR 173, ORH 173
174: USA ORH 174
175: USA MO 175
176-179: no entries
180: USA US 180, OR 180, ORH 180
181: no entry
182: USA I-182, OR 182, ORH 182
183: no entry
184: USA I-184
185: USA NY 185
186-188: no entries
189: USA I-189, CA 189, ORH 189
190: AUT S190, USA I-190
191: AUT S191, USA US 191, ORH 191
192: no entry
193: USA ORH 193
194: USA I-194, OR 194, ORH 194
195-196: no entries
197: USA US 197, CA 197, MN 197
198: no entry
199: USA US 199
200: USA CA 200, MN 200, MT 200, OR 200, ORH 200
201: USA OR 201, ORH 201
202: USA US 202, OR 202
203: USA OR 203
204: no entry
205: USA I-205
206-209: no entry
210: USA I-210, CA 210, MN 210, OR 210, ORH 210
211: USA OR 211, ORH 211
212: USA US 212, OR 212, ORH 212
213: USA OR 213
214: USA OR 214
215: USA I-215, ORH 215
216: no entry
217: USA OR 217
218: USA US 218
219: USA OR 219
220: USA I-220
221: USA OR 221
222: USA OR 222, ORH 222
223: USA OR 223
224: USA OR 224
225: USA OR 225, ORH 225
226: USA OR 226, ORH 226
227: USA CA 227, ORH 227
228: USA OR 228, ORH 228
229: USA OR 229, MTS 229, ORH 229
230: no entry
231: USA ORH 231
232: no entry
233: USA OR 233
234: no entry
235: USA I-235, ORH 235
236: USA ORH 236
237: no entry
238: USA I-238, OR 238
239: no entry
240: USA OR 240, ORH 240
241: no entry
242: USA OR 242
243: no entry
244: USA SD 244
245: USA AR 245
246: USA MN 246
247-248: no entries
249: USA MO 249
250: no entry
251: USA MN 251
252-253: no entries
254: USA CA254
256-258: no entries
259: USA CA 259
260-264: no entries
265: USA UT 265
266-269: no entries
270: USA US 270, ORH 270
271: USA CA 271
272: USA ORH 272
273-277: no entries
278: USA I-278
279: no entry
280: USA I-280, MN 280
281: USA US 281, OR 281, ORH 281
282: USA OR 281, ORH 282
283-284: no entries
285: USA US 285
286: no entry
287: USA US 287, CT 287
288-289: no entries
290: USA I-290
291: no entry
292: USA MN 292, ORH 292
293-297: no entries
298: USA MN 298
299: USA CA 299, MN 299
300-301: no entries
302: ENG A302
303-304: no entries
305: USA I-305
306-309: no entries
310: USA US 310
311-314: no entries
315: ENG A315
316-323: no entries
324: USA NY 324
325-329: no entries
330: USA CA 330
331-340: no entries
341: USA NV 341, WY 341
342: USA NV 342
343-350: no entries
351: USA OR 351, ORH 351
352-359: no entries
360: USA ORH 360
361-367: no entries
368: USA CO 368
369: no entry
370: USA CO 370, OR 370, ORH 370
371: USA US 37, CO 371, MN 371
372-379: no entries
380: USA I-380, OR 380, ORH 380
381-384: no entries
385: USA US 385
386-390: no entries
391: FRA A391
392-393: no entries
394: USA I-394
395: USA US 395
396-400: no entries
401: CAN ON 401, ENG A401, USA WA 401
402: CAN ON 402
403: CAN ON 403
404: error highway not found
405: USA I-405
406-408: no entries
409: USA WA 409
410: USA WA 410
411: USA WA 411
412-420: no entries
421: EUR E421
422-423: no entries
424: USA ORH 424
425: no entry
426: USA ORH 426
427-431: no entries
432: USA WA 432
433: USA WA 433
434: no entry
435: USA I-435
436-441: no entries
442: EUR E442
443-450: no entries
451: USA OR 451, ORH 451
452-460: no entries
461: EUR E461
462-469: no entries
470: USA I-470
471-474: no entries
475: USA I-475
476-479: no entries
480: USA ORH 480
481: no entry
482: USA ORH 482
483: USA ORH 483
484: USA ORH 484
485: USA ORH 485
486-490: no entries
491: USA US 491
492-493: no entries
494: USA I-494
495: USA I-495
496-499: no entries
500: USA WA 500
501: USA OR 501, WA 501
502: USA WA 502
503: USA WA 503
504: USA WA 504
505: USA I-505
506-508: no entries
509: USA WA 509
510: USA I-510
511: no entry
512: USA WA 512
513-514: no entries
515: USA I-515
516: USA WA 516
517: no entry
518: USA WA 518
519: no entry
520: USA WA 520
521: no entry
522: USA NM 522
523-527: no entries
528: USA OR 528
529-532: no entries
533: EUR E533
534: no entry
535: USA I-535
536-539: no entries
540: USA I-540
541-548: no entries
549: USA AR 549
550: USA US 550
551: USA OR 551
552: EUR E552
553-568: no entries
569: USA OR 569
570-579: no entries
580: USA I-580
581-588: no entries
589: USA NV 589
590-598: no entries
599: USA NM 599, WA 599
600-604: no entries
605: USA I-605
606-609: no entries
610: USA MN 610
611-674: no entries
675: USA I-675
676-679: no entries
680: USA I-680
681-693: no entries
694: USA I-694
695-704: no entries
705: USA I-705
706-709: no entries
710: USA I-710, CA 710
711-788: no entries
789: USA WY 789
790-800: no entries
801: USA MN 801
802-879: no entries
880: USA I-880
881-894: no entries
895: USA I-895
896-899: no entries
900: USA WA 900
901-979: no entries
980: USA I-980
981-1210: no entries
1211: ENG A1211
1212-3210: no entries
3211: ENG A3211
3212: ENG A3212
3213-5200: no entries
5201: ENG A5201
5202->: no entries
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on July 17, 2021, 06:46:33 PM
Quote from: Konza on May 18, 2020, 10:57:11 PM
In the interest of keeping the thread going, I've filled in a gap or two as well, as follows:

184:  NM
185:  Interstate
186:  AZ
187:  AR
188:  AZ
189, 190, 191, 192:  US

Just got back from a long trip east, and can update as follows:

193:  Alabama
194:  Illinois (since decommissioned) (Kennedy Expy and east end of the Northwest Tollway- now I-90)
195, 196:  Interstate
197:  Virginia (Laburnum Ave. in Richmond)
198:  New Mexico
199:  Texas (Jacksboro Highway in Fort Worth)
200:  Montana (Concurrency with US 93)
201:  Utah
202:  Arizona (Loop)
203:  Illinois
204:  Utah (Wall Ave. in Ogden)
205:  Interstate
206:  US
207:  Virginia
208:  Pennsylvania
209:  New Mexico
210:  Utah
211, 212:  US
213:  Wisconsin (in Beloit)
214:  Rhode Island (in Newport)
215:  Interstate
216:  Michigan
217:  Oregon
218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224:  US
225:  Texas (to Pasadena)
226, 227, 228:  New Mexico
229:  Interstate
230:  Pennsylvania
231:  US
232:  Ohio  (Grant's birthplace)
233:  Virginia (to Reagan Airport)
234:  Indiana (Shades State Park)
235:  Interstate
236:  Kentucky (Cincinnati Airport)
237:  Ohio (Cleveland Airport)
238:  Arizona
239:  Michigan (to New Buffalo)
240:  Interstate
241:  Wisconsin (27th St in Milwaukee)
242:  Oregon
243:  Indiana
244:  Interstate
245:  Indiana
246:  Missouri
247:  Florida
248, 249:  Missouri
250:  US
251:  Illinois
252:  New Mexico
253:  South Carolina
254:  Kansas
255:  Interstate
256, 257:  Indiana
258, 259:  US
260, 261:  Arizona
262:  Indiana
263:  Florida
264, 265:  Interstate
266:  Arizona
267:  Illinois
268:  Kansas
269:  Missouri
270, 271:  Interstate
272:  New Mexico
273:  Missouri
274:  Pennsylvania
275, 276: Interstate
277:  US
278, 279, 280:  Interstate
281:  US
282:  California (Coronado Island)
283:  US
284:  Ohio
285:  US

The next one is low hanging fruit but there are some in the next fifty that I'll have to work to travel.  I'll update in a couple of weeks.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 17, 2021, 08:16:21 PM
Well, somebody certainly looks retired. :D






























oscar511
formulanone479
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Konza286
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
US 8957
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Evan_Th28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Bruce6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bruce on July 19, 2021, 06:38:23 PM
I have now been on a brief section of WA 6, so my new lowest is... 14

And since I plan on driving WA 14 in the next few days, my next next lowest will be 25.

(BC 1, US 2, WA 3, WA 4, I-5, WA 6, WA 7, WA 8, WA 9, MI 10, WA 11, US 12, QC A-13, WA 14, BC 15, WA 16, WA 17, WA 18, WA 19, WA 20, NJ 21, OR 22, US 23, WA 24)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Evan_Th on July 19, 2021, 09:48:38 PM
After looking closely, I realized that I actually have been on A28 in England!  I was on a bus in Canterbury that took St. George's Street through the St. George's Roundabout (https://www.google.com/maps/@51.2769655,1.0838363,141m/data=!3m1!1e3).  Our path and the A28 flowed together around the roundabout, so I'd say that technically I didn't just cross it but went on it.

I've also been on US 29 (in NC and VA), US 30 (in OR), US 31 (in IN), and NC 32 (in Plymouth, NC), so my next gap is 33.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 20, 2021, 08:34:32 AM
Movement in the lower ranks...
































oscar511
formulanone479
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Konza286
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
US 8957
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
SkyPesos47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
Bruce14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on July 20, 2021, 06:43:59 PM
While tracking my travels, I realized that I have been on my lowest number (47) 8 years ago, on an overlap of MO 47 with MO 21. So now to find my next lowest...

OH 48, MO 49, US 50, US 51, US 52, IL 53, US 54, I-55, OH 56, I-57

New lowest is 58 for me.

After that, my second lowest, as a note to myself...

US 59, PA 60, US 61, US 62, OH 63, I-64, I-65, I-66, US 67, I-68, I-69, I-70, I-71, I-72, OH 73, I-74, I-75, I-76, I-77, I-78, I-79, I-80, I-81, CA 82, I-83, I-84, I-85

...is 86.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 20, 2021, 06:57:27 PM
Desperate stretching to move up the ranks ensues...

































oscar511
formulanone479
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
cl94288
Rothman288
Konza286
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
US 8957
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
Bruce14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Occidental Tourist on July 20, 2021, 11:24:59 PM
I have never been on a route 3 unless a county route with a letter in front of the 3 counts.

If the county route counts, then I have never been on a route 32.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 21, 2021, 06:49:44 AM
Quote from: Occidental Tourist on July 20, 2021, 11:24:59 PM
I have never been on a route 3 unless a county route with a letter in front of the 3 counts.

If the county route counts, then I have never been on a route 32.
It's up to you.  Which number do you want?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on July 24, 2021, 08:52:15 AM
Another update! (still no 48 yet):
0: CZE D0, HUN M0, BEL R0
1: ASIA AH1, AUT A1, CHE A1, CZE D1, DEU A3, B1, ENG A1, FRA A1, HUN M1, F1, SVK D1, CAN TCH/BC 1, USA CA 1, ND 1, ORH 1
2: AUT A2, CHE A2, CZE D2, DEU B2r, ENG A2, HUN M2, F2, IND NH 2 (former, still signed), 2B (former, still signed), WB 2, NLD A2, SVK D2, USA US 2, CA 2, MO 2, ORH 2
3: BEL A3, CHE A3, FRA A3, HUN F3, USA CA 3, MN 3, ND 3, ORH 3
4: ENG M4, A4, FRA A4, HUN F4, ITA A4, SVK D4, USA CA 4, WA 4, ORH 4
5: AUT A4, CAN ON 5, FRA A5, N5, USA I-5, US 5, MN 5, ORH 5
6: CAN ON 6, FRA A6, N6, USA US 6, MN 6, OR 6, WA 6, ORH 6
7: CZE D7, DEU A7, HUN M7, IND WB 7, USA US 7, MO 7, NY 7, WA 7, ORH 7
8: AUT A8, DEU A8, IND WB 8, USA NY 8, OR 8
9: CHE A9, DEU A9, USA US 9, NY 9N, ORH 9
10: HUN F10, USA I-10, US 10, OR 10, ORH 10
11: CZE D11, BEL R11, USA OR 11
12: AUT A12, BEL A12, IND NH 12, USA I-12, US 12, CA 12, VT 12
13: AUT A13, CHE A13, IND WB 13, USA MN 13, WI 13
14: AUT A14, IND WB 14, USA US 14, CA 14T, WA 14, VT 14, ORH 14
15: EUR E15, USA I-15, CO 15, CT 15, MN 15, VT 15, ORH 15
16: AUT S16, USA CA 16, MN 16, WI 16, ORH 16
17: USA CO 17, NM 17, VT 17, ORH 17
18: USA US 18, CA 18, OR 18, ORH 18
19: EUR E19, HUN M19, IND NH 19, USA ID 19, MN 19, OR 19
20: ENG M20, A20, BEL R20, USA I-20, US 20, CA 20, MN 20, ORH 20
21: AUT A21, BEL R21, USA ID 21, MN 21, ORH 21
22: ITA A22, USA CA 22, CT 22, NY 22, OR 22, VT 22A, ORH 22
23: EUR E23, AUT A23, USA US 23, CA 23, MN 23, WI 23
24: CAN ON 24, USA US 24, CA 24, MN 24
25: EUR E25, AUT A25, BEL A25, ENG M25, USA I-25, ID 25, MN 25, ORH 25
26: FRA A26, USA US 26, MI 26, ORH 26
27: EUR E27, BEL A27, USA ID 27, IA 27, MN 27, OR 27, ORH 27
28: USA MI 28
29: USA I-29, NY 29, ORH 29
30: USA US 30, MN 30, WI 30, UT 30, ORH 30
31: FRA A31, USA ORH 31
32: USA NY 32, ORH 32
33: USA CA 33, ORH 33
34: EUR E34, USA MN 34, OR 34, SD 34
35: EUR E35, CZE D35, USA CA 35, OR 35, WI 35, ORH 35
36: USA CA 36, OR 36
37: USA OR 37, SD 37T, ORH 37
38: USA CA 38, MI 38, OR 38, ORH 38
39: FRA A39, USA CA 39, OR 39, ORH 39
40: EUR E40, ENG A40, USA I-40, US 40, ORH 40
41: EUR E41, USA US 41, CA 41, ORH 41
42: EUR E42, USA OR 42
43: EUR E43, USA MN 43, MO 43, OR 43, ORH 43
44: EUR E44, USA I-44, US 44, CA 44, MN 44, SD 44
45: EUR E45, USA I-45, US 45, SD 45, ORH 45
46: USA CA 46, OR 46, ORH 46
47: USA MN 47, OR 47, ORH 47
48: <- Lowest highway number not traveled. Closest instance: ORH 48 (US 395), John Day to Burns
49: USA I-49, US 49
50: USA US 50, MN 50, NY 50, WY 50, ORH 50
51: USA US 51, MN 51, OR 51, ORH 51
52: EUR E52, USA US 52, ID 52, OR 52, MO 52
53: USA US 53, OR 53, ORH 53
54: EUR E54
55: EUR E55, USA I-55, CA 55, ID 55, MI 55, MN 55
56: EUR E56, USA US 56, MN 56, WI 56
57: ITA A57, USA CA 57, MN 57
58: EUR E58, NLD A58, USA CA 58, OR 58, ORH 58
59: EUR E59, NLD A59, USA US 59, CA 59, MO 59, WY 59
60: EUR E60, USA US 60, CA 60, MN 60, WI 60
61: USA US 61, ORH 61
62: EUR E62, USA US 62, MN 62, OR 62
63: USA US 63, SD 63, ORH 63
64: USA US 64, AZ 64, MI 64, MN 64, ORH 64
65: EUR E65, USA US 65, MN 65
66: USA CA 66, MO 66, OR 66, ORH 66
67: EUR E67, USA US 67, NY 67, ORH 67
68: USA CA 68, MN 68, NM 68, ORH 68
69: USA I-69, US 69, ORH 69
70: EUR E70, USA I-70, US 70, ORH 70
71: EUR E71, USA US 71, CA 71
72: USA ID 72, ORH 72
73: USA CA 73, MN 73
74: USA NM 74, NY 74, OR 74
75: EUR E75, USA I-75, US 75
76: USA MN 76
77: USA MI 77, MN 77
78: USA WI 78
79: USA SD 79
80: USA I-80, US 80, MN 80
81: <- Runner up
82: USA I-82, OR 82, WI 82
83: FRA N83, USA US 83, CA 83
84: USA I-84, US 84, CA 84
85: USA US 85
86: FRA A86, USA MO 86
87: USA I-87, US 87, MN 87, SD 87
88: <- Third place
89: USA I-89, US 89, CA 89, SD 89
90: USA I-90, US 90, CA 90
91: CAN BC 91, USA I-91, CA 91, ORH 91
92: USA UT 92, ORH 92
93: USA US 93, ORH 93
94: USA I-94, MI 94
95: DEU A95, USA I-95, US 95, MN 95
96: DEU A96, USA US 96
97: USA US 97
98: USA US 98
99: CAN BC 99, DEU 99, USA CA 99, OR 99, 99W, 99E, WA 99
100: ENG A100, USA MN 100, WA 100, VT 100, ORH 100
101: USA US 101
102: USA ORH 102
103: USA OR 103, WA 103, ORH 103
104: FRA N104, USA OR 104, ORH 104
105: USA I-105, MN 105, WA 105, ORH 105
106: no entry
107: USA WA 107, VT 107
108: USA VT 108
109: no entry
110: USA I-110, CA 110, MN 110, WY 110, ORH 110
111: no entry
112: USA CO 112
113: USA CA 113, USA WI 113
114: IND NH 114
115: USA I-115
116: IND NH 116A, USA CA 116
117: no entry
118: USA CA 118
119: no entry
120: USA CA 120, OR 120, WY 120, ORH 120
121-122: no entries
123: USA MI 123, ORH 123
124-125: no entries
126: USA OR 126
127: USA OR 127
128: USA CA 128
129: no entry
130: USA OR 130, WI 130, ORH 130
131: USA OR 131, WI 131, ORH 131
132: USA OR 132
133: no entry
134: USA CA 134
135-137: no entries
138: USA OR 138, ORH 138
139: USA CA 139, MN 139
140: USA CA 140, OR 140, ORH 140
141: USA OR 141, WA 141, ORH 141
142: USA CO 142, ORH 142
143: USA ORH 143
144: USA ORH 144
145: no entry
146: USA CA 146, UT 146
147-148: no entries
149: USA MN 149, NY 149
150: USA ORH 150
151: USA US 151, ORH 151
152: USA CA 152
153: USA OR 153, ORH 153
154: USA OR 154, ORH 154
155: USA ORH 155
156: USA CA 156
157: USA ORH 157
158: no entry
159: USA CO 159
160: USA US 160, IA 160, ORH 160
161: USA CA 161, WA 161, ORH 161
162: USA WI 162, ORH 162
163: USA ORH 163
164: USA OR 164, ORH 164
165: USA US 165
166: USA CA 166
167: USA WA 167
168: USA CA 168
169: USA US 169, CA 169
170: USA CA 170
171: USA ORH 171
172: USA NV 172
173: USA CA 173, OR 173, ORH 173
174: USA ORH 174
175: USA MO 175
176-179: no entries
180: USA US 180, OR 180, ORH 180
181: no entry
182: USA I-182, OR 182, ORH 182
183: no entry
184: USA I-184
185: USA NY 185
186-188: no entries
189: USA I-189, CA 189, ORH 189
190: AUT S190, USA I-190
191: AUT S191, USA US 191, ORH 191
192: no entry
193: USA ORH 193
194: USA I-194, OR 194, UT 194, ORH 194
195-196: no entries
197: USA US 197, CA 197, MN 197
198: no entry
199: USA US 199
200: USA CA 200, MN 200, MT 200, OR 200, ORH 200
201: USA OR 201, ORH 201
202: USA US 202, OR 202
203: USA OR 203
204: no entry
205: USA I-205
206: USA OR 206
207: USA OR 207
208-209: no entries
210: USA I-210, CA 210, MN 210, OR 210, ORH 210
211: USA CA 211, OR 211, ORH 211
212: USA US 212, OR 212, ORH 212
213: USA OR 213
214: USA OR 214
215: USA I-215, ORH 215
216: USA OR 216
217: USA OR 217
218: USA US 218
219: USA OR 219
220: USA I-220
221: USA OR 221
222: USA OR 222, ORH 222
223: USA OR 223
224: USA OR 224
225: USA OR 225, ORH 225
226: USA OR 226, ORH 226
227: USA CA 227, OR 227, ORH 227
228: USA OR 228, ORH 228
229: USA CA 229, OR 229, MTS 229, ORH 229
230: USA OR 230
231: USA ORH 231
232: no entry
233: USA OR 233
234: USA 234
235: USA I-235, ORH 235
236: USA ORH 236
237: USA OR 237
238: USA I-238, OR 238
239: no entry
240: USA OR 240, ORH 240
241: USA OR 241
242: USA OR 242
243: no entry
244: USA SD 244
245: USA AR 245
246: USA MN 246
247-248: no entries
249: USA MO 249
250: USA OR 250
251: USA MN 251, OR 251
252: USA MN 252
253: no entry
254: USA CA 254
255: USA CA 255, OR 255
256-258: no entries
259: USA CA 259
260: USA OR 260
261-264: no entries
265: USA CA 265, UT 265
266-269: no entries
270: USA US 270, ORH 270
271: USA CA 271
272: USA ORH 272
273: USA CA 273, OR 273
274-277: no entries
278: USA I-278
279: no entry
280: USA I-280, MN 280
281: USA US 281, OR 281, ORH 281
282: USA OR 282, ORH 282
283-284: no entries
285: USA US 285
286: no entry
287: USA US 287, CT 287
288-289: no entries
290: USA I-290
291: no entry
292: USA MN 292, ORH 292
293-297: no entries
298: USA MN 298
299: USA CA 299, MN 299
300-301: no entries
302: ENG A302
303-304: no entries
305: USA I-305
306-309: no entries
310: USA US 310
311-314: no entries
315: ENG A315
316-323: no entries
324: USA NY 324
325-329: no entries
330: USA CA 330
331: USA OR 331
332-340: no entries
341: USA NV 341, WY 341
342: USA NV 342
343-350: no entries
351: USA OR 351, ORH 351
352-359: no entries
360: USA ORH 360
361: USA OR 361
362-367: no entries
368: USA CO 368
369: no entry
370: USA CO 370, OR 370, ORH 370
371: USA US 37, CO 371, MN 371
372-379: no entries
380: USA I-380, OR 380, ORH 380
381-384: no entries
385: USA US 385
386-390: no entries
391: FRA A391
392-393: no entries
394: USA I-394
395: USA US 395
396-400: no entries
401: CAN ON 401, ENG A401, USA WA 401
402: CAN ON 402
403: CAN ON 403
404: error highway not found
405: USA I-405
406-408: no entries
409: USA WA 409
410: USA WA 410
411: USA WA 411
412-420: no entries
421: EUR E421
422: USA OR 422
423: no entry
424: USA ORH 424
425: no entry
426: USA ORH 426
427-429: no entries
430: USA NV 430
431: no entry
432: USA WA 432
433: USA WA 433
434: no entry
435: USA I-435
436-441: no entries
442: EUR E442
443-450: no entries
451: USA OR 451, ORH 451
452: USA OR 452
453: USA OR 453
454: USA OR 454
455-460: no entries
461: EUR E461
462-469: no entries
470: USA I-470
471-474: no entries
475: USA I-475
476-479: no entries
480: USA ORH 480
481: no entry
482: USA ORH 482
483: USA ORH 483
484: USA ORH 484
485: USA ORH 485
486-490: no entries
491: USA US 491
492-493: no entries
494: USA I-494
495: USA I-495
496-499: no entries
500: USA WA 500
501: USA OR 501, WA 501
502: USA WA 502
503: USA WA 503
504: USA WA 504
505: USA I-505
506-508: no entries
509: USA WA 509
510: USA I-510
511: no entry
512: USA WA 512
513-514: no entries
515: USA I-515
516: USA WA 516
517: no entry
518: USA WA 518
519: no entry
520: USA WA 520
521: no entry
522: USA NM 522
523-527: no entries
528: USA OR 528
529-532: no entries
533: EUR E533
534: no entry
535: USA I-535
536-539: no entries
540: USA I-540, OR 540
541: no entry
542: USA OR 542
543-548: no entries
549: USA AR 549
550: USA US 550
551: USA OR 551
552: EUR E552
553-568: no entries
569: USA OR 569
570-579: no entries
580: USA I-580
581-588: no entries
589: USA NV 589
590-598: no entries
599: USA NM 599, WA 599
600-604: no entries
605: USA I-605
606-609: no entries
610: USA MN 610
611-674: no entries
675: USA I-675
676-679: no entries
680: USA I-680
681-693: no entries
694: USA I-694
695-704: no entries
705: USA I-705
706-709: no entries
710: USA I-710, CA 710
711-788: no entries
789: USA WY 789
790-800: no entries
801: USA MN 801
802-879: no entries
880: USA I-880
881-894: no entries
895: USA I-895
896-899: no entries
900: USA WA 900
901-979: no entries
980: USA I-980
981-1210: no entries
1211: ENG A1211
1212-3210: no entries
3211: ENG A3211
3212: ENG A3212
3213-5200: no entries
5201: ENG A5201
5202->: no entries
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on July 29, 2021, 11:10:35 PM
As threatened.

Took a drive west of Tucson yesterday, so:

286:  Arizona
287:  US
288:  Texas
289:  Arizona
290:  Interstate
291:  Missouri
292:  New Mexico
293:  Florida
294, 295:  Interstate
296, 297, 298:  Florida
299:  Tennessee
300:  New Mexico
301, 302:  US
303:  Arizona (Loop)
304, 305, 306:  Ohio
307:  Virginia
308, 309:  Pennsylvania
310:  Interstate
311:  Arkansas
312:  Indiana
313:  Ohio
314:  New Mexico
315:  Ohio

The journey continues...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Occidental Tourist on July 30, 2021, 12:29:16 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 21, 2021, 06:49:44 AM
Quote from: Occidental Tourist on July 20, 2021, 11:24:59 PM
I have never been on a route 3 unless a county route with a letter in front of the 3 counts.

If the county route counts, then I have never been on a route 32.
It's up to you.  Which number do you want?

Since they're usually not signed well, I'll take the 3.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 31, 2021, 12:14:35 PM
Retiree moves up and a promising amateur enters the race.

































oscar511
formulanone479
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
US 8957
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ftballfan26
mapman107124
ketchup9924
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
Bruce14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on July 31, 2021, 04:36:15 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on January 23, 2019, 02:30:05 PM
54 is the lowest number within Minnesota that I have not used.

With MN 54 being turned back in its entirety last year, the lowest I have not used is now MN 78 (which coincidentally received an extension in the swap with Grant County for MN 54).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 31, 2021, 04:51:01 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on July 31, 2021, 04:36:15 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on January 23, 2019, 02:30:05 PM
54 is the lowest number within Minnesota that I have not used.

With MN 54 being turned back in its entirety last year, the lowest I have not used is now MN 78 (which coincidentally received an extension in the swap with Grant County for MN 54).
So, still 102 overall?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on July 31, 2021, 06:01:11 PM
Quote from: Rothman on July 31, 2021, 04:51:01 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on July 31, 2021, 04:36:15 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on January 23, 2019, 02:30:05 PM
54 is the lowest number within Minnesota that I have not used.

With MN 54 being turned back in its entirety last year, the lowest I have not used is now MN 78 (which coincidentally received an extension in the swap with Grant County for MN 54).
So, still 102 overall?

Yes.

To confuse you further I have knowingly been on Hennepin CSAHs 102 (Douglas Drive in Golden Valley) and 103 (West Broadway in Brooklyn Park), but I only count state routes.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: deathtopumpkins on August 02, 2021, 11:26:33 AM
I am annoyingly still hanging out at 188. Just checked to see if I picked one up on my cross-country travels in May and July, but nope - despite passing intersections with both AZ 188 and NM 188!

Maybe I'll need to take a drive down to CT or up north of Bangor one weekend soon...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Evan_Th on August 02, 2021, 12:29:46 PM
Quote from: deathtopumpkins on August 02, 2021, 11:26:33 AM
Maybe I'll need to take a drive down to CT or up north of Bangor one weekend soon...

Unfortunately, my 33 is looking unlikely.  I've crossed US 33 and IL 33 several times on my travels through the midwest, and OK 33 in my travels there, but never turned on them.  I'm planning to travel to California in a few months, but nowhere around CA 33.  I had a chance to go to NC 33 a few years ago, but that's over now.  Maybe someday the border will open and I'll head to the Okanagan and BC 33?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 02, 2021, 02:56:08 PM
Quote from: deathtopumpkins on August 02, 2021, 11:26:33 AM
I am annoyingly still hanging out at 188. Just checked to see if I picked one up on my cross-country travels in May and July, but nope - despite passing intersections with both AZ 188 and NM 188!

Maybe I'll need to take a drive down to CT or up north of Bangor one weekend soon...

Yep, if you're in it to win it, have to keep your next routes in mind. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bruce on August 03, 2021, 12:54:33 AM
I'm now up to 25.

1: BC, MI, US [NJ], Berlin
2: US [WA], MA
3: WA, ON, A [ENG]
4: WA
5: I [WA, OR], MI
6: WA, OR, US [OH]
7: WA, BC, OR
8: WA, OR, I [CA], MI
9: WA, MA
10: WA, MI
11: WA, OR
12: US [WA, MI]
13: QC
14: WA
15: BC,
16: WA
17: WA
18: WA
19: WA
20: WA, US [OR, ID, MA], QC
21: NJ
22: OR
23: US [OH]
24: WA
25
26: US [OR, ID]
27: WA
28: WA, MA
29
30: US [OR, ID], MA
31
32
33: US [OH]
34: OR
35
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on August 03, 2021, 02:39:52 AM
Mine is still 57, but over the past few months I've made considerable headway further down the list. As of now, there are only 5 route numbers below 200 that I have never used:

57: I should get I-57 on a cross country drive in a couple weeks ... and if not, I have a central Utah clinchdrive planned at some point that will pick up the one in Utah
161: easiest would be Utah, which I've passed both endpoints of but never actually used
162: annoyingly, I've been right past the end of Utah 162, but it is so far southeast it's hard to get to without another dedicated trip to the area. I've also been past the end of GA 162, which is close enough to Atlanta to be reachable
188: no obvious candidates here. There is no 188 in Utah, and Georgia's is way down south. Even neighboring states with a 188 have them in rather inaccessible places.
192: Georgia would be the easiest for this one, but I don't really ever have a reason to be in that part of the state (plus I've done that bit of I-16 already). Maybe someday I'll go to Disney again and find US 192 for a bit
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ketchup99 on August 04, 2021, 12:28:32 PM
Drove I-195 to Cape Cod recently, which included a short overlap with MA-24. So 24 is done.
MA-25
PA-26
NC-27
MA-28
US-29
US-30
I think 31 is next.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 05, 2021, 07:34:22 PM
Down table leapfrogging...



































oscar511
formulanone479
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Mapmikey266
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
US 8957
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ftballfan26
Bruce25
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on August 05, 2021, 08:50:46 PM
Meanwhile, I still have never been on a 22 as far as I can determine.

Of all the times I've driven to and from the Mexican border on I-35, I don't think I've ever stopped for gas in Hillsboro, TX.  I've driven right past the northern terminus of MN-22, on MN-23.  I've been around the east side of Mexico (MO) but never the west side.  I've ridden Greyhound right past the northern terminus of WI-22, on US-41 en route to Menominee, MI.  So several close calls, but none qualifying.

Frustrating, it is.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on August 05, 2021, 08:59:46 PM
Quote from: kphoger on August 05, 2021, 08:50:46 PM
Meanwhile, I still have never been on a 22 as far as I can determine.

Of all the times I've driven to and from the Mexican border on I-35, I don't think I've ever stopped for gas in Hillsboro, TX.  I've driven right past the northern terminus of MN-22, on MN-23.  I've been around the east side of Mexico (MO) but never the west side.  I've ridden Greyhound right past the northern terminus of WI-22, on US-41 en route to Menominee, MI.  So several close calls, but none qualifying.

Frustrating, it is.
Just like how you found it surprising that I (and some others) haven't been on US 60 when you been on hundreds of miles of it, I find it surprising that you haven't been on a 22 when there is one in my backyard  :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on August 05, 2021, 09:03:22 PM
Quote from: SkyPesos on August 05, 2021, 08:59:46 PM
I find it surprising that you haven't been on a 22 when there is one in my backyard

should have been a nimby
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on August 06, 2021, 07:35:13 PM
Quote from: kphoger on August 05, 2021, 08:50:46 PM
Meanwhile, I still have never been on a 22 as far as I can determine.

Of all the times I've driven to and from the Mexican border on I-35, I don't think I've ever stopped for gas in Hillsboro, TX.  I've driven right past the northern terminus of MN-22, on MN-23.  I've been around the east side of Mexico (MO) but never the west side.  I've ridden Greyhound right past the northern terminus of WI-22, on US-41 en route to Menominee, MI.  So several close calls, but none qualifying.

Frustrating, it is.

Never been on Half Day Road in the Chicago suburbs?  Was just on IL 22 in Lake Zurich and Fox River Grove a month ago...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on August 06, 2021, 09:37:43 PM
Quote from: Konza on August 06, 2021, 07:35:13 PM
Never been on Half Day Road in the Chicago suburbs?  Was just on IL 22 in Lake Zurich and Fox River Grove a month ago...

Not that I can recall, no.

I used to live in Wheaton and Carol Stream (and River Forest before that), and my girlfriend at the time had some family in Ingleside.  That was twenty years ago, and I only specifically remember taking Metra up to Ingleside from downtown Chicago.  I do have a vague memory of driving between DuPage County and Ingleside, so it's likely that I have crossed Route 22 while driving on Rand Road a time or two.  But I don't count crossing a highway as "being on" that highway.

While living in the area, I rarely had any other occasion to go to the northern suburbs.  The only couple I can think of never took me that far north.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Roadsguy on August 06, 2021, 10:29:40 PM
I drove part of DE 4 last week, so my new lowest is 5. I don't live near any Route 5s, so it'll be a while before I have an excuse to drive one.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on August 07, 2021, 10:39:39 AM
Making the big move...

Took an 18-hr U-turn trip specifically to drive OH 266.

This means that the lowest number I have not been on is now 428...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 07, 2021, 10:56:15 AM
This is the kind of persistence and "someone needs to reconsider their life's priorities" kind of determination that I like to see in Operation: Get Oscar, whether you move up a couple hundred slots or just one.




































oscar511
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
US 8957
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ftballfan26
Bruce25
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 07, 2021, 11:24:55 AM
Quote from: Mapmikey on August 07, 2021, 10:39:39 AM
Making the big move...

Took an 18-hr U-turn trip specifically to drive OH 266.

This means that the lowest number I have not been on is now 428...

I am glad to hear that there is one in Ohio.  I was wondering how you would get there because I saw that only NY seems to have one in the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast.

I am expecting to stay at 89 for a while. (though that might change if I make it to Arizona next month)  I recently got 91 (OH), 108 (PA), 151 (OH), 210 (PA), 240 (VA), 243 (VA), 318 (MD and PA), 349 (MD), 350 (PA), 353 (MD), 368 (PA), 371 (KY), 379 (VA), 383 (MD), 385 (VA), and 388 (VA).  I will not look above 400 at this point, but there is a chance that I go up to 154 in a few months.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on August 07, 2021, 03:27:45 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 02, 2021, 02:56:08 PM
Yep, if you're in it to win it, have to keep your next routes in mind. :D

No fornicating fecal matter.

Last month I crossed over Ohio 323 while driving I-71 from Columbus to Cincinnati.  Obviously if I had been at the top of my game I would have exited the super slab and driven 323 for a while.

It's still probably the most accessible 323 to me, but who knows when I will be there again?

Life can be an unpleasant woman some times.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on August 07, 2021, 03:48:11 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 07, 2021, 10:56:15 AM
This is the kind of persistence and "someone needs to reconsider their life's priorities" kind of determination that I like to see in Operation: Get Oscar, whether you move up a couple hundred slots or just one.

I have the sneaking suspicion that sometime soon, oscar is going to post and announce that he has just returned from one of his road trips and is now up to somewhere in the upper 700's ...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on August 07, 2021, 03:55:24 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on August 07, 2021, 03:48:11 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 07, 2021, 10:56:15 AM
This is the kind of persistence and "someone needs to reconsider their life's priorities" kind of determination that I like to see in Operation: Get Oscar, whether you move up a couple hundred slots or just one.

I have the sneaking suspicion that sometime soon, oscar is going to post and announce that he has just returned from one of his road trips and is now up to somewhere in the upper 700's ...

Either that or someone like the TxDOT Farm-to-Market Road Program Director is going to join and then we're all going to have to get to 3551 or something.

(I'm a little surprised H.B. is on a three-digit number and not a four-digit one...)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on August 07, 2021, 10:09:56 PM
Quote from: US 89 on August 03, 2021, 02:39:52 AM
Mine is still 57, but over the past few months I've made considerable headway further down the list. As of now, there are only 5 route numbers below 200 that I have never used:

57: I should get I-57 on a cross country drive in a couple weeks ... and if not, I have a central Utah clinchdrive planned at some point that will pick up the one in Utah
161: easiest would be Utah, which I've passed both endpoints of but never actually used
162: annoyingly, I've been right past the end of Utah 162, but it is so far southeast it's hard to get to without another dedicated trip to the area. I've also been past the end of GA 162, which is close enough to Atlanta to be reachable
188: no obvious candidates here. There is no 188 in Utah, and Georgia's is way down south. Even neighboring states with a 188 have them in rather inaccessible places.
192: Georgia would be the easiest for this one, but I don't really ever have a reason to be in that part of the state (plus I've done that bit of I-16 already). Maybe someday I'll go to Disney again and find US 192 for a bit

I just clinched Utah 57 and 161 today. My lowest is now 162.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on August 07, 2021, 10:16:32 PM
Quote from: US 89 on August 07, 2021, 10:09:56 PM
Quote from: US 89 on August 03, 2021, 02:39:52 AM
Mine is still 57, but over the past few months I've made considerable headway further down the list. As of now, there are only 5 route numbers below 200 that I have never used:

57: I should get I-57 on a cross country drive in a couple weeks ... and if not, I have a central Utah clinchdrive planned at some point that will pick up the one in Utah
161: easiest would be Utah, which I've passed both endpoints of but never actually used
162: annoyingly, I've been right past the end of Utah 162, but it is so far southeast it's hard to get to without another dedicated trip to the area. I've also been past the end of GA 162, which is close enough to Atlanta to be reachable
188: no obvious candidates here. There is no 188 in Utah, and Georgia's is way down south. Even neighboring states with a 188 have them in rather inaccessible places.
192: Georgia would be the easiest for this one, but I don't really ever have a reason to be in that part of the state (plus I've done that bit of I-16 already). Maybe someday I'll go to Disney again and find US 192 for a bit

I just clinched Utah 57 and 161 today. My lowest is now 162.
I actually thought you would get I-57 first for a 57, considering that I-57 is included in the "Ultimate I-64 and I-70 Experience" package, and it seemed like you were in the Midwest over the past week based on your other posts.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 07, 2021, 10:47:09 PM
A somewhat decent bump up...




































oscar511
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
dlsterner135
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
ftballfan26
Bruce25
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 08, 2021, 07:10:56 PM
Where we're at:

Did some very, very simple statistical analysis of our little group of 112 roadgeeks: 

--Our current range goes from 1 to 511, but a histogram is obviously skewed very much to the right, with a skew just over 2.  The kurtosis is also more than a little obvious, with the data peaking all the way over to the left with a very long tail (kurtosis =4.39). 

--The mode of our dataset is 2, with seven roadgeeks stuck down there, but we also have another secondary peak of five roadgeeks that are stuck at 102 (get thee to Acadia National Park, thou stuck roadgeeks). 

--The median is at 40, which is demonstrative of the tremendous skew of our dataset (i.e., half our roadgeeks are stuck at 40 or below, and the remainder, after a secondary lump, spread out thinner and thinner all the way up to 511).  Our mean is 84, and the difference between the mean and median is also indicative of the tremendous skew of the data.

--A key point is 203.  Beyond this point, the gaps between roadgeeks get notably larger.  Below 203, the biggest gap is 19 (between 63 and 82).  Beyond 203, despite a small five-point gap between 329 and 334, most of the rest are relatively gigantic (in the 40s, 50s and even above 60).

An amateur may conclude that "the higher you go, the harder it gets," but I do not think the data supports that assertion.  I would think the larger gaps in the upper range would indicate that large jumps are easier, probably due to people racking up routes when further down the line while having holes of lower numbers that they still needed to snag.

And, of course, the skew to the right seems to correlate to American income distribution histograms, where those with more economic means and schedule freedom have more ability to move up the ranks than those that do not.

Here's an image of the histogram of our little group, for what little it may be worth:

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51366888310_69b1a6bbc7_k.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2mg7Jim)

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 08, 2021, 07:18:07 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on August 07, 2021, 10:39:39 AM
Making the big move...

Took an 18-hr U-turn trip specifically to drive OH 266.

This means that the lowest number I have not been on is now 428...

I guess your next trip will lead you to PA 428 in Oil City, PA (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?u=null&units=miles&r=pa.pa428).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on August 08, 2021, 07:59:02 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 08, 2021, 07:10:56 PM
--The mode of our dataset is 2, with seven roadgeeks stuck down there, but we also have another secondary peak of five roadgeeks that are stuck at 102 (get thee to Acadia National Park, thou stuck roadgeeks).

Or Lincoln or Pottawatomie counties in OK. OK-102 is a fairly painless clinch close in to the OKC metro. It also concurs with I-40 if you're in it for the easy pickup for this thread (but not the other one). It even connects with old US-66 on the north end so you can touch it as part of a 66 trip.

Quote from: Rothman on August 08, 2021, 07:10:56 PM
An amateur may conclude that "the higher you go, the harder it gets," but I do not think the data supports that assertion.  I would think the larger gaps in the upper range would indicate that large jumps are easier, probably due to people racking up routes when further down the line while having holes of lower numbers that they still need to snag.

I suspect the truth of "the higher you go, the harder it gets" depends on the state(s) within your daytrip range. I'd be interested in seeing a plot of the data that identified the declared state of residence of the user.

The highest state highway number Oklahoma has ever commissioned will be a week old tomorrow, and that number is 375. There's also a ton of gaps in between there and the lower numbers (the valid SH in numbers in OK above 170 are 171, 199, 209, 266, 270, 251A, 301, 312, 351, 364, and 375, with 344 having been approved but not constructed yet.) The highest number in OK, full stop, is 444.

Meanwhile, someone living in Cincinnati, Virginia, or central Texas has access to large densities of high numbers within daytrip range. Seeing the sorts of numbers I'd need to get Oscar is a novelty when I travel out of Oklahoma; we just don't have things like Route 744 in Springfield MO or SR-912 in northwest IN.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 08, 2021, 08:31:05 PM
QuoteMeanwhile, someone living in Cincinnati, Virginia, or central Texas has access to large densities of high numbers within daytrip range. Seeing the sorts of numbers I'd need to get Oscar is a novelty when I travel out of Oklahoma; we just don't have things like Route 744 in Springfield MO or SR-912 in northwest IN.

Well I have MD 940, PA 994, PA 995, PA 997, and PA 999 within 100 miles of my current residence.  That only helps oscar.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on August 08, 2021, 08:34:17 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on August 08, 2021, 07:18:07 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on August 07, 2021, 10:39:39 AM
Making the big move...

Took an 18-hr U-turn trip specifically to drive OH 266.

This means that the lowest number I have not been on is now 428...

I guess your next trip will lead you to PA 428 in Oil City, PA (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?u=null&units=miles&r=pa.pa428).

I'm missing 5 of the next 6 numbers, so going specifically to get 428 won't net me much.  There is no 429 within my day trip range.

I do have an itinerary to go get the rest of the US routes I'm missing in Penna, which include most of US 62; east half of US 20 and most of US 6 west of Warren.  This would give me opportunities to get 428 and 430...

Geography of where roadgeeks live is a huge factor.  If you live way out west you might struggle to get the <10 numbers. 

Per Wikipedia, there is only one current primary 511 in the lower 48 (OH 511).  Some people might count state-wide secondary systems such as NJ and FL having 511s.  I'm guessing most people would not count the very well posted full-shielded Virginia secondary routes, which would enable both Oscar and me to run up the number line quite easily once either of us reaches 600.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on August 08, 2021, 09:14:16 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 08, 2021, 07:59:02 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 08, 2021, 07:10:56 PM
--The mode of our dataset is 2, with seven roadgeeks stuck down there, but we also have another secondary peak of five roadgeeks that are stuck at 102 (get thee to Acadia National Park, thou stuck roadgeeks).

Or Lincoln or Pottawatomie counties in OK. OK-102 is a fairly painless clinch close in to the OKC metro. It also concurs with I-40 if you're in it for the easy pickup for this thread (but not the other one). It even connects with old US-66 on the north end so you can touch it as part of a 66 trip.

Yet another option is to go to the Jacksonville FL airport.  The access road to the airport is FL 102, which is how I got my 102.  Somehow I missed getting ME 102 when I was at Acadia back in 2019.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on August 08, 2021, 11:58:25 PM
I've been on OK 102 where it concurs with I-40, but my main claim to that number is Utah 102 (which I've clinched). It's fairly easy to grab some of as it forms part of the I-15 and I-84 business loops in Tremonton, though 102 itself doesn't directly interchange with 15.

Quote from: Mapmikey on August 08, 2021, 08:34:17 PM
Geography of where roadgeeks live is a huge factor.  If you live way out west you might struggle to get the <10 numbers. 

Yeah, most of my very low numbers are largely from places in the eastern half of the US. If you live in a place like Arizona, even most of the smaller 2 digit routes could be quite hard to grab.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on August 09, 2021, 12:32:14 AM
Quote from: Mapmikey on August 08, 2021, 08:34:17 PM

Per Wikipedia, there is only one current primary 511 in the lower 48 (OH 511).  Some people might count state-wide secondary systems such as NJ and FL having 511s.  I'm guessing most people would not count the very well posted full-shielded Virginia secondary routes, which would enable both Oscar and me to run up the number line quite easily once either of us reaches 600.

Oscar, if you reading this, OH 511 is only 35 miles from Public Square (Cleveland) and 25 miles from the western extent of the roadtour I'm presenting at the end of this month...if you want to change your mind about attending the Cleveland meet.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on August 09, 2021, 06:55:36 AM
I would get stuck in the high 80s and 90s, since AFAIK there's no road numbered 87 anywhere in Spain (Maybe in Badajoz province, which is far from reach for me).

Looks like I'll get a change to snag that elusive 18 in early September.

As a side note, I got a 101 recently :sombrero:. No 102, though.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on August 09, 2021, 12:34:55 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 07, 2021, 03:55:24 PM
Either that or someone like the TxDOT Farm-to-Market Road Program Director is going to join and then we're all going to have to get to 3551 or something.

Oh, Scott...  Surely you knew you couldn't post something like that without my replying...

There's a decent chance the TxDOT Farm-to-Market Road Program Director wouldn't even hit four digits.

Texas hasn't had a highway numbered 948 in more than three decades, with FM-948 having been decommissioned in 1990 (http://www.dot.state.tx.us/tpp/hwy/fm0500/fm0948.htm).  However, according to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Farm_to_Market_Roads_in_Texas_(900%E2%80%93999)#FM_948), it hadn't been signed since 1956, and the cancellation order in 1990 was more of a clean-up formality than anything.

As for neighboring states, LA-948 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_state_highways_in_Louisiana_(900%E2%80%93949)#Louisiana_Highway_948) is just a two-block connector southeast of Baton Rouge.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 09, 2021, 12:39:52 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on August 08, 2021, 09:14:16 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 08, 2021, 07:59:02 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 08, 2021, 07:10:56 PM
--The mode of our dataset is 2, with seven roadgeeks stuck down there, but we also have another secondary peak of five roadgeeks that are stuck at 102 (get thee to Acadia National Park, thou stuck roadgeeks).

Or Lincoln or Pottawatomie counties in OK. OK-102 is a fairly painless clinch close in to the OKC metro. It also concurs with I-40 if you're in it for the easy pickup for this thread (but not the other one). It even connects with old US-66 on the north end so you can touch it as part of a 66 trip.

Yet another option is to go to the Jacksonville FL airport.  The access road to the airport is FL 102, which is how I got my 102.  Somehow I missed getting ME 102 when I was at Acadia back in 2019.

I am expecting to get VA/WV 102 to straighten out that one.

Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on August 09, 2021, 12:32:14 AM
Quote from: Mapmikey on August 08, 2021, 08:34:17 PM

Per Wikipedia, there is only one current primary 511 in the lower 48 (OH 511).  Some people might count state-wide secondary systems such as NJ and FL having 511s.  I'm guessing most people would not count the very well posted full-shielded Virginia secondary routes, which would enable both Oscar and me to run up the number line quite easily once either of us reaches 600.

Oscar, if you reading this, OH 511 is only 35 miles from Public Square (Cleveland) and 25 miles from the western extent of the roadtour I'm presenting at the end of this month...if you want to change your mind about attending the Cleveland meet.

Sadly, I cannot count my fictional VA 511 in Prince George County (part of fictional maps if it all turned into suburbia).  Of course, PA has 512, 513, 514, 516, 518, and 519 after 511. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on August 09, 2021, 01:46:30 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on August 08, 2021, 08:34:17 PM
Geography of where roadgeeks live is a huge factor.  If you live way out west you might struggle to get the <10 numbers. 

The biggest factor is just that it takes so long to drive to another state.  If you live in western MA, say, you can be in 7 or 8 different states in the time that it takes me to get to my closest bordering state.  Lots more options when you just have more states around you in general.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on August 09, 2021, 01:55:15 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on August 09, 2021, 12:32:14 AM
Quote from: Mapmikey on August 08, 2021, 08:34:17 PM

Per Wikipedia, there is only one current primary 511 in the lower 48 (OH 511).  Some people might count state-wide secondary systems such as NJ and FL having 511s.  I'm guessing most people would not count the very well posted full-shielded Virginia secondary routes, which would enable both Oscar and me to run up the number line quite easily once either of us reaches 600.

Oscar, if you reading this, OH 511 is only 35 miles from Public Square (Cleveland) and 25 miles from the western extent of the roadtour I'm presenting at the end of this month...if you want to change your mind about attending the Cleveland meet.

There's also Louisiana Highway 511 in Shreveport/Bossier City.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on August 09, 2021, 02:11:06 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on August 09, 2021, 12:32:14 AM
Quote from: Mapmikey on August 08, 2021, 08:34:17 PM

Per Wikipedia, there is only one current primary 511 in the lower 48 (OH 511).  Some people might count state-wide secondary systems such as NJ and FL having 511s.  I'm guessing most people would not count the very well posted full-shielded Virginia secondary routes, which would enable both Oscar and me to run up the number line quite easily once either of us reaches 600.

Oscar, if you reading this, OH 511 is only 35 miles from Public Square (Cleveland) and 25 miles from the western extent of the roadtour I'm presenting at the end of this month...if you want to change your mind about attending the Cleveland meet.

I noticed that. Indeed, I was recently in northern Ohio, on US 250, and drove past the OH 511 intersection (and photographed the route marker) without thinking to turn off to cover part of OH 511.

But even if I'd claimed a 511 that way, I'm also missing 512. There isn't one in Ohio, but there are in two neighboring states. After that, I'm missing 517, 523, 532, and more I haven't identified. So just getting past 511 doesn't get me very far, unless I stumble into a treasure trove of 5xx routes like the one in Mississippi and Louisiana that helped me get into the 500s.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on August 09, 2021, 02:12:56 PM
Quote from: oscar on August 09, 2021, 02:11:06 PM
But even if I'd claimed a 511 that way, I'm also missing 512. There isn't one in Ohio, but there are in two neighboring states. After that, I'm missing 517, 523, 532, and more I haven't identified. So just getting past 511 doesn't get me very far, unless I stumble into a treasure trove of 5xx routes like the one in Mississippi and Louisiana that helped me get into the 500s.

New Mexico has a bunch as well.  They're not all right next to each other, but they exist.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bassoon1986 on August 09, 2021, 04:14:16 PM
See, I'm stuck on 101. Next time I'm driving towards Lake Charles I could get a piece of LA 101 and hit I-10 the next exit down. I just rarely drive that way or even to Houston. I'd be able to jump up quite a few I think.


iPhone
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on August 14, 2021, 09:28:39 AM
Taking a three-day vacation to western Maryland, I snagged MD 135, which was my lowest numbered route not traveled.  Also made sure to get PA 160 for future use (gotta plan ahead sometimes!).

My lowest number not traveled is now 142.

There is a VA 142 near Petersburg that is probably the closest, which I can get, along with VA 149 and VA 153 next time I'm in that part of the state.  The next "pain-in-the-ass" number for me is probably 148.  Probably VA 148 at Fancy Gap may be my best bet.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bruce on August 27, 2021, 05:16:01 PM
Now that I've driven around a good portion of Washington, I am up to 29.

1: BC, MI, US [NJ], Berlin, ID
2: US [WA, ID, MT], MA
3: WA, ON, A [ENG]
4: WA
5: I [WA, OR], MI
6: WA, OR, US [OH], ID
7: WA, BC, OR
8: WA, OR, I [CA], MI, ID
9: WA, MA
10: WA, MI
11: WA, OR
12: US [WA, ID, MI]
13: QC
14: WA
15: BC
16: WA
17: WA
18: WA
19: WA
20: WA, US [OR, ID, MA], QC
21: NJ, WA
22: OR, WA
23: US [OH], WA
24: WA
25: WA
26: US [OR, ID]
27: WA
28: WA, MA
29
30: US [OR, ID], MA
31: WA
32
33: US [OH]
34: OR
35: OR/WA
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 27, 2021, 06:18:40 PM
Little bumps.




































oscar511
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
Scott511493
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on August 27, 2021, 06:26:57 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 27, 2021, 06:18:40 PM
Nipples.

FTFY
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hbelkins on August 27, 2021, 08:42:13 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 07, 2021, 03:55:24 PM
(I'm a little surprised H.B. is on a three-digit number and not a four-digit one...)

I have been by KY 335 numerous times on I-65 and US 31W, but have never driven by it. I plan to fix that the next time I am in that part of the state.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on August 28, 2021, 10:42:47 AM
Why did they renumber AS-18 to AS-II? Now I'm still stuck at 18. Hopefully I can grab one next Sunday...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Daniel Fiddler on August 28, 2021, 05:53:25 PM
Interstate 2 probably

Unless Hawaii H1 counts
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on August 28, 2021, 07:56:03 PM
Quote from: Daniel Fiddler on August 28, 2021, 05:53:25 PM
Interstate 2 probably

Unless Hawaii H1 counts

That counts for 1.  You've never been on any highway of any sort numbered 2?

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MCRoads on August 28, 2021, 08:26:56 PM
Lowest interstate I haven't been on is I-2. Lowest US Route I haven't been on is US-2. Both are very far from anywhere I've lived.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Daniel Fiddler on August 28, 2021, 08:36:24 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on August 28, 2021, 07:56:03 PM
Quote from: Daniel Fiddler on August 28, 2021, 05:53:25 PM
Interstate 2 probably

Unless Hawaii H1 counts

That counts for 1.  You've never been on any highway of any sort numbered 2?

Chris

I will have to ponder this one.  I know I have never been on I-2 or US 2.  As in a state numbered 2, that I don't know
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on August 29, 2021, 01:18:16 PM
I went down to Hugo to clinch OK-93 last night (also grabbing nearby-ish 98 while I was at it), so that puts me at 97. I've crossed under OK-97 before, and my 2019 Port Aransas trip intersected TX-97, but I've never been on either of them. But the most frustrating thing is, whereas in most other states MO-97/I-44 would be a concurrency, for some reason MO routed 97 down the frontage road. Aargh!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on August 31, 2021, 01:00:23 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 29, 2021, 01:18:16 PM
I went down to Hugo to clinch OK-93 last night (also grabbing nearby-ish 98 while I was at it), so that puts me at 97. I've crossed under OK-97 before, and my 2019 Port Aransas trip intersected TX-97, but I've never been on either of them. But the most frustrating thing is, whereas in most other states MO-97/I-44 would be a concurrency, for some reason MO routed 97 down the frontage road. Aargh!

How would a concurrency even work there?  The southbound part doesn't even have an interchange.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 31, 2021, 01:51:30 PM
Moved Scott5114 up the ranks, but I'm unsure if Daniel Fiddler and MCRoads considered other numbered highways than Interstates and U.S. routes.  Looks like ethanhopkin14 accidentally posted in the wrong thread (i.e., good stat, but not for this therad).





































oscar511
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 31, 2021, 02:13:50 PM
I drove under OH 511 on I-71 Friday Night, and of course I remembered to think about oscar.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 31, 2021, 02:18:27 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on August 31, 2021, 02:13:50 PM
I drove under OH 511 on I-71 Friday Night, and of course I remembered to think about oscar.
This shall be a time-honored roadgeek tradition from now on.  When on a route 511, you must take a moment to remember Oscar.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on August 31, 2021, 10:07:11 PM
Quote from: kphoger on August 31, 2021, 01:00:23 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on August 29, 2021, 01:18:16 PM
I went down to Hugo to clinch OK-93 last night (also grabbing nearby-ish 98 while I was at it), so that puts me at 97. I've crossed under OK-97 before, and my 2019 Port Aransas trip intersected TX-97, but I've never been on either of them. But the most frustrating thing is, whereas in most other states MO-97/I-44 would be a concurrency, for some reason MO routed 97 down the frontage road. Aargh!

How would a concurrency even work there?  The southbound part doesn't even have an interchange.

What I meant was, in most other states, they'd have interchanges at both places so they could have a concurrency, rather than maintaining two miles of frontage-road-as-state-highway.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on August 31, 2021, 10:25:15 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 31, 2021, 02:18:27 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on August 31, 2021, 02:13:50 PM
I drove under OH 511 on I-71 Friday Night, and of course I remembered to think about oscar.
This shall be a time-honored roadgeek tradition from now on.  When on a route 511, you must take a moment to remember Oscar.

Might be too late to change my ways... 511 makes me think of this (https://www.511pa.com/).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on September 01, 2021, 08:09:35 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 31, 2021, 02:18:27 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on August 31, 2021, 02:13:50 PM
I drove under OH 511 on I-71 Friday Night, and of course I remembered to think about oscar.
This shall be a time-honored roadgeek tradition from now on.  When on a route 511, you must take a moment to remember Oscar.

Interestingly, the only active primary route on Wikipedia's "list of highways numbered 511" is OH 511. There's also a FM 511. But the Wikipedia list may not actually be complete.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on September 01, 2021, 08:27:49 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on September 01, 2021, 08:09:35 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 31, 2021, 02:18:27 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on August 31, 2021, 02:13:50 PM
I drove under OH 511 on I-71 Friday Night, and of course I remembered to think about oscar.
This shall be a time-honored roadgeek tradition from now on.  When on a route 511, you must take a moment to remember Oscar.

Interestingly, the only active primary route on Wikipedia's "list of highways numbered 511" is OH 511. There's also a FM 511. But the Wikipedia list may not actually be complete.

Mississippi and Louisiana have 511s.

(https://live.staticflickr.com/4579/38888605042_dd1c2d8565_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/22fsgqo)

(https://live.staticflickr.com/4710/38897598124_0ccb43beee_b.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/22gfmKw)

I don't think the Louisiana highways are classified as primary or not; there's some very short (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_state_highways_in_Louisiana_(1%E2%80%9399)#Louisiana_Highway_50) two-digit routes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_state_highways_in_Louisiana_(1%E2%80%9399)#Louisiana_Highway_53), and lengthy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisiana_Highway_3127) four-digit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_state_highways_in_Louisiana_(3000%E2%80%933049)#Louisiana_Highway_3049) highways (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisiana_Highway_1077).

For those going to the county-route well:
- New Jersey's 511 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_Route_511_(New_Jersey)) is 37.44 miles in length.
- Florida's Brevard 511 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_county_roads_in_Brevard_County,_Florida#CR_511) is a former secondary route
- Alabama's Talladega-Clay-Coosa County 511 (https://www.google.com/maps/dir/33.1932886,-86.3075037/33.0657879,-86.0536261/@33.1565016,-86.2859046,12.6z/data=!4m14!4m13!1m10!3m4!1m2!1d-86.3022409!2d33.1927568!3s0x8889577a0878de57:0x7915562e63fdea19!3m4!1m2!1d-86.2669084!2d33.171214!3s0x888957c53a9a310f:0x525a236747405df5!1m0!3e0) is part of a former alignment of US 280, so it goes on for about 18 miles. For Alabama, it's a rare example of a county route keeping the same number between three different counties.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MCRoads on September 02, 2021, 07:19:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 31, 2021, 01:51:30 PM
Moved Scott5114 up the ranks, but I'm unsure if Daniel Fiddler and MCRoads considered other numbered highways than Interstates and U.S. routes.  Looks like ethanhopkin14 accidentally posted in the wrong thread (i.e., good stat, but not for this therad).

SNIP!

No, I don't even think I'd that... I know I've been on OK-3 (it's almost impossible not to if you have lived in the OKC metro), but I'm not sure if I have ever been on a state road 2. I don't really pay attention to state roads that much...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 02, 2021, 08:11:05 PM
Not quite the golf score...





































oscar511
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on September 03, 2021, 12:41:28 PM
Quote from: MCRoads on September 02, 2021, 07:19:12 PM

Quote from: Rothman on August 31, 2021, 01:51:30 PM
Moved Scott5114 up the ranks, but I'm unsure if Daniel Fiddler and MCRoads considered other numbered highways than Interstates and U.S. routes.  Looks like ethanhopkin14 accidentally posted in the wrong thread (i.e., good stat, but not for this therad).

SNIP!

No, I don't even think I'd that... I know I've been on OK-3 (it's almost impossible not to if you have lived in the OKC metro), but I'm not sure if I have ever been on a state road 2. I don't really pay attention to state roads that much...

Must not have read the OP, then, considering it mentions several state routes.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on September 05, 2021, 01:48:57 AM
My latest road trip (now near Little Rock, a few days away from home) brought my lowest-numbered untraveled route up to 539. As kind of a consolation prize for Hurricane Ida making me reroute my trip away from the New Orleans area, I instead turned north to the Shreveport area, which wasn't trashed by Ida and has many state highways in the low 500s.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 05, 2021, 08:39:55 AM
I think 511 was more magical, but now we have to think of Oscar on 539.

Also, the rest of you need to step up your game.





































oscar539
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
deathtopumpkins188
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on September 05, 2021, 01:37:54 PM
I still have to double check, but per OpenStreetMap my lowest number is now 26. However the 18 I claim is labelled as 19 in other maps (e.g. Google Maps and my van's GPS), so I'll need to get the official log. I have a 19 from elsewhere, so it wouldn't affect if I confirm the 18.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 05, 2021, 01:45:05 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on September 05, 2021, 01:37:54 PM
I still have to double check, but per OpenStreetMap my lowest number is now 26. However the 18 I claim is labelled as 19 in other maps (e.g. Google Maps and my van's GPS), so I'll need to get the official log. I have a 19 from elsewhere, so it wouldn't affect if I confirm the 18.
I'll wait for the double check.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on September 05, 2021, 01:45:27 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 05, 2021, 08:39:55 AM
Also, the rest of you need to step up your game.

Working on it...but while I can get my next few steps up the ladder fairly easily with in-state trips, I have a block coming up at 106, which will require trips to the far side of Kansas or Missouri (or Texas, but I think getting to Minneapolis KS might be more doable than San Antonio).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on September 05, 2021, 03:40:47 PM
Quote from: snowc on September 05, 2021, 03:01:45 PM
Can I join the game?
Lowest-numbered route I have NOT been on?
In NC - NC 2
In US based Trips from NC to NY - US 2
In Interstates - I84 in Scranton (ONCE went on exit to there due to splitting lanes, but got back on 81)

The question is this:  Of all the routes you've ever been on, what is the lowest number not represented by any of them?

For example, my number is 22.  This means I've never been on any route numbered 22, anywhere.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 05, 2021, 05:51:46 PM
Quote from: snowc on September 05, 2021, 05:49:27 PM
Quote from: kphoger on September 05, 2021, 03:40:47 PM
Quote from: snowc on September 05, 2021, 03:01:45 PM
Can I join the game?
Lowest-numbered route I have NOT been on?
In NC - NC 2
In US based Trips from NC to NY - US 2
In Interstates - I84 in Scranton (ONCE went on exit to there due to splitting lanes, but got back on 81)

The question is this:  Of all the routes you've ever been on, what is the lowest number not represented by any of them?

For example, my number is 22.  This means I've never been on any route numbered 22, anywhere.
Like not driving under or over them (assuming its a crossing bridge between the main interstate or highway)?  :hmmm:
You have to be on the route, not over or under it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 05, 2021, 05:54:39 PM
Quote from: snowc on September 05, 2021, 05:49:27 PM
Quote from: kphoger on September 05, 2021, 03:40:47 PM
Quote from: snowc on September 05, 2021, 03:01:45 PM
Can I join the game?
Lowest-numbered route I have NOT been on?
In NC - NC 2
In US based Trips from NC to NY - US 2
In Interstates - I84 in Scranton (ONCE went on exit to there due to splitting lanes, but got back on 81)

The question is this:  Of all the routes you've ever been on, what is the lowest number not represented by any of them?

For example, my number is 22.  This means I've never been on any route numbered 22, anywhere.
Like not driving under or over them (assuming its a crossing bridge between the main interstate or highway)?  :hmmm:

If you cross over or under a route, or even cross it at grade, you haven't been on the route.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on September 05, 2021, 06:13:57 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on September 05, 2021, 05:54:39 PM
If you cross over or under a route, or even cross it at grade, you haven't been on the route.

It can, of course, get a little weird.  At least in the hypothetical world, what if you did a U-turn by swinging wide at an intersection?  Do you get to count that crossroad?  That is, in the illustration below, can you count 309?

(https://i.imgur.com/AMFh3vf.jpg)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on September 05, 2021, 06:19:36 PM
Quote from: SafeSpeeder on September 05, 2021, 06:15:59 PM
Route 1 definitely! But should that count as there are probably a million Route 1s?

You've never been on any route that's numbered "1" ??
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 05, 2021, 06:22:03 PM
Quote from: SafeSpeeder on September 05, 2021, 06:15:59 PM
Route 1 definitely! But should that count as there are probably a million Route 1s?

If you've been on any route 1, then that counts. What's the lowest number where you haven't been on any routes of that number.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on September 05, 2021, 06:24:47 PM
Quote from: 1 on January 23, 2019, 07:39:50 AM
The thread title is slightly misleading taken literally. Taken literally, it would be 1 for everyone except those that have been on every single Route 1, but that's not what I meant.

Quote from: SafeSpeeder on September 05, 2021, 06:15:59 PM
Route 1 definitely! But should that count as there are probably a million Route 1s?

Also known as "didn't read the OP".
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on September 05, 2021, 06:30:14 PM
Quote from: SafeSpeeder on September 05, 2021, 06:28:16 PM
The Route 1 that goes from Maine to Key West

Repeating what others have said:

Have you been on any other route 1s anywhere else?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 05, 2021, 06:46:12 PM
I'm waiting until people learn to make sense.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bruce on September 06, 2021, 03:59:20 AM
Quote from: Rothman on September 05, 2021, 08:39:55 AM
Also, the rest of you need to step up your game.

I'm 700 miles from the nearest Route 29 (over in east-central Idaho). Alberta's would actually be not too much further.

If only I could count the implied designation of WA-29 (US 395, based on its child routes), but sadly it's not a real hidden route.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on September 06, 2021, 04:43:40 PM
Quote from: Bruce on September 06, 2021, 03:59:20 AM
Quote from: Rothman on September 05, 2021, 08:39:55 AM
Also, the rest of you need to step up your game.

I'm 700 miles from the nearest Route 29 (over in east-central Idaho). Alberta's would actually be not too much further.

If only I could count the implied designation of WA-29 (US 395, based on its child routes), but sadly it's not a real hidden route.
Doesn't Washington also skip a bunch of two digit numbers somewhere in the middle? I remember there not being any SR in the 50s, 60s and 70s ranges.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 06, 2021, 05:08:09 PM
For everybody who is struggling with this:

Start with 1.

Have you ever been on any highway numbered 1? Doesn't have to be US 1, doesn't have to be any specific state highway 1, just any highway numbered 1.
If no, then 1 is your answer.
If yes, move on to 2.

Have you ever been on any highway numbered 2? Doesn't have to be I-2 or US 2, just any highway numbered 2.
If no, then 2 is your answer.
If yes, then move on to 3.

Keep repeating until you finally answer no. That number is your answer.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bruce on September 06, 2021, 06:08:29 PM
Quote from: SkyPesos on September 06, 2021, 04:43:40 PM
Quote from: Bruce on September 06, 2021, 03:59:20 AM
Quote from: Rothman on September 05, 2021, 08:39:55 AM
Also, the rest of you need to step up your game.

I'm 700 miles from the nearest Route 29 (over in east-central Idaho). Alberta's would actually be not too much further.

If only I could count the implied designation of WA-29 (US 395, based on its child routes), but sadly it's not a real hidden route.
Doesn't Washington also skip a bunch of two digit numbers somewhere in the middle? I remember there not being any SR in the 50s, 60s and 70s ranges.

Yes, because it doesn't fit the grid. The easternmost route is SR 31 (SR 41 is further east but was numbered to match ID, by coincidence fitting in the grid) and the northernmost used to be SR 30 (now part of SR 20).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: deathtopumpkins on September 07, 2021, 08:41:49 AM
Finally picked up ME 188 on a trip to downeast Maine yesterday!

Continuing on...*
189 - I
190 - I
191 - US
192 - CT
193 - CT
194 - ME
195 - I
196 - ME
197 - ME
198 - ME
199 - ME
200 - MN
201 - NY
202 - US
203 - MA
204 - QC
205 - I
206 - US
207 - ME
208 - ME
209 - ME
210 - NY
211 - UT
212 - US
213 - MA
214 - QC
215 - I
216 - CT
217 - England (A217)
218 - ME
219 - ME
220 - ME
221 - US
222 - MD
223 - QC
224 - ME
225 - VA
226 - England (A226)
227 - QC (if this (https://goo.gl/maps/TpNfTRZxzeMoXb9d7) counts as a concurrency with 133 - TM says it does!)
228 - MA
229 - CT
230 - ME
231 - ME
232 - ME
233 - ME
234 - VA
235 - VA
236 - VA
237 - ME
238 - ME
239 - intersected QC 239, cannot verify that I've actually been on VA 239 but likely have

So it looks like my new number is 239! Jumping up a little bit.

Closest options for me to pick one up would be... Quebec, Maryland or Pennsylvania, though I may find myself back in Hampton Roads sooner to visit family.

*(not listing every system I've been on that number in, just the first one I find)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on September 07, 2021, 09:57:06 AM
Quote227 - QC (if this counts as a concurrency with 133 - TM says it does!)

You could also get VA 227 on your Hampton Roads Trip to squash this debate.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 07, 2021, 11:48:33 AM
One big jump.  (It's just a jump to the left?)





































oscar539
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on September 07, 2021, 06:26:04 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on September 06, 2021, 05:08:09 PM
For everybody who is struggling with this:

Start with 1.

Have you ever been on any highway numbered 1? Doesn't have to be US 1, doesn't have to be any specific state highway 1, just any highway numbered 1.
If no, then 1 is your answer.
If yes, move on to 2.

Have you ever been on any highway numbered 2? Doesn't have to be I-2 or US 2, just any highway numbered 2.
If no, then 2 is your answer.
If yes, then move on to 3.

Keep repeating until you finally answer no. That number is your answer.

This is a good way to put it.

For those of us who tend to think a bit more visually: I keep track of every instance of each route number I've been on in a spreadsheet. It looks something like this. So for example, for route 12s I have been on US 12, CA 12, GA 12, and UT 12:

(https://i.imgur.com/EZfMT1w.png)

Your answer for this thread is the first row in your version of this spreadsheet that has zero entries in it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 07, 2021, 07:22:04 PM
Quote from: US 89 on September 07, 2021, 06:26:04 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on September 06, 2021, 05:08:09 PM
For everybody who is struggling with this:

Start with 1.

Have you ever been on any highway numbered 1? Doesn't have to be US 1, doesn't have to be any specific state highway 1, just any highway numbered 1.
If no, then 1 is your answer.
If yes, move on to 2.

Have you ever been on any highway numbered 2? Doesn't have to be I-2 or US 2, just any highway numbered 2.
If no, then 2 is your answer.
If yes, then move on to 3.

Keep repeating until you finally answer no. That number is your answer.

This is a good way to put it.

For those of us who tend to think a bit more visually: I keep track of every instance of each route number I've been on in a spreadsheet. It looks something like this. So for example, for route 12s I have been on US 12, CA 12, GA 12, and UT 12:

(https://i.imgur.com/EZfMT1w.png)

Your answer for this thread is the first row in your version of this spreadsheet that has zero entries in it.

I'm doing something similar to what you did. I built a spreadsheet where the rows are highway numbers and the columns are highway systems. If the number doesn't exist in the state it gets colored black. If it exists and I have been on it, it gets colored green. If it exists and I haven't been on it yet, it gets colored red.

So far I have the numbers 1-99 and the seven systems I've been on the most. Adding more as time allows.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 10, 2021, 11:29:44 AM
Another one for the rank and file:





































oscar539
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
paulthemapguy175
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on September 10, 2021, 12:17:02 PM
I'm a dingus with my 175 figure.  I was on IA-175 in September 2019.  My lowest number should actually be 207.  (If I just took ME-207 to cut south to Cape Elizabeth, Maine, instead of Pleasant Hill Road...my number would be 214...)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 10, 2021, 02:40:47 PM
Caught the dingus:



































oscar539
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
paulthemapguy207
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US20IL64 on September 10, 2021, 03:33:19 PM
I-2 in TX, may never see it. 10 once a year in PHX.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 10, 2021, 03:36:30 PM
Quote from: US20IL64 on September 10, 2021, 03:33:19 PM
I-2 in TX, may never see it. 10 once a year in PHX.

But you haven't been on US2 or any other state highway numbered 2?

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on September 10, 2021, 03:48:15 PM
Maybe this thread should be titled "Lowest route number you haven't been on anywhere, ever" since so many people seem to participate before they understand what the thread is about. :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 10, 2021, 03:52:42 PM
If it were just interstates, unless you've been to Alaska, Hawai'i, or Puerto Rico, everyone's number would just be 1.  As posted in the "Your Route Log" thread, I have been on thirty #1's and only got an interstate numbered 1 (I-A1) this summer.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 11, 2021, 02:03:58 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 10, 2021, 03:52:42 PM
If it were just interstates, unless you've been to Alaska, Hawai'i, or Puerto Rico, everyone's number would just be 1.  As posted in the "Your Route Log" thread, I have been on thirty #1's and only got an interstate numbered 1 (I-A1) this summer.

Chris

I'll drop you back down to 1, then.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 11, 2021, 02:48:59 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 11, 2021, 02:03:58 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 10, 2021, 03:52:42 PM
If it were just interstates, unless you've been to Alaska, Hawai'i, or Puerto Rico, everyone's number would just be 1.  As posted in the "Your Route Log" thread, I have been on thirty #1's and only got an interstate numbered 1 (I-A1) this summer.

Chris

I'll drop you back down to 1, then.

No!  I'm in the midst of planning my trip on PEI to get most of my numbers up to 300!

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 11, 2021, 10:35:14 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 11, 2021, 02:48:59 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 11, 2021, 02:03:58 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 10, 2021, 03:52:42 PM
If it were just interstates, unless you've been to Alaska, Hawai'i, or Puerto Rico, everyone's number would just be 1.  As posted in the "Your Route Log" thread, I have been on thirty #1's and only got an interstate numbered 1 (I-A1) this summer.

Chris

I'll drop you back down to 1, then.

No!  I'm in the midst of planning my trip on PEI to get most of my numbers up to 300!

Chris
Pfft.  Who needs Canadian routes? :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 12, 2021, 12:16:28 AM
Quote from: Rothman on September 11, 2021, 10:35:14 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 11, 2021, 02:48:59 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 11, 2021, 02:03:58 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 10, 2021, 03:52:42 PM
If it were just interstates, unless you've been to Alaska, Hawai'i, or Puerto Rico, everyone's number would just be 1.  As posted in the "Your Route Log" thread, I have been on thirty #1's and only got an interstate numbered 1 (I-A1) this summer.

Chris

I'll drop you back down to 1, then.

No!  I'm in the midst of planning my trip on PEI to get most of my numbers up to 300!

Chris
Pfft.  Who needd Canadian routes? :D

People who live west of the Great Plains.  (Was about to say the Mississippi and then realized Louisiana has most, if not all).

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 12, 2021, 12:40:32 AM


Quote from: jayhawkco on September 12, 2021, 12:16:28 AM
Quote from: Rothman on September 11, 2021, 10:35:14 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 11, 2021, 02:48:59 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 11, 2021, 02:03:58 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 10, 2021, 03:52:42 PM
If it were just interstates, unless you've been to Alaska, Hawai'i, or Puerto Rico, everyone's number would just be 1.  As posted in the "Your Route Log" thread, I have been on thirty #1's and only got an interstate numbered 1 (I-A1) this summer.

Chris

I'll drop you back down to 1, then.

No!  I'm in the midst of planning my trip on PEI to get most of my numbers up to 300!

Chris
Pfft.  Who needs Canadian routes? :D

People who live west of the Great Plains.  (Was about to say the Mississippi and then realized Louisiana has most, if not all).

Chris

Meh.  Lots of 200s west of PEI. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bassoon1986 on September 12, 2021, 06:38:53 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 12, 2021, 12:16:28 AM
Quote from: Rothman on September 11, 2021, 10:35:14 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 11, 2021, 02:48:59 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 11, 2021, 02:03:58 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 10, 2021, 03:52:42 PM
If it were just interstates, unless you've been to Alaska, Hawai'i, or Puerto Rico, everyone's number would just be 1.  As posted in the "Your Route Log" thread, I have been on thirty #1's and only got an interstate numbered 1 (I-A1) this summer.

Chris

I'll drop you back down to 1, then.

No!  I'm in the midst of planning my trip on PEI to get most of my numbers up to 300!

Chris
Pfft.  Who needd Canadian routes? :D

People who live west of the Great Plains.  (Was about to say the Mississippi and then realized Louisiana has most, if not all).

Chris
Louisiana just doesn't have any of the 200's. It goes up to 184, adds 191, then jumps to 300.


iPhone
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on September 15, 2021, 02:37:12 PM
By short detours on my way to/from visiting friends at the Jersey Shore, I traveled significant parts of three 500-series signed New Jersey county routes. Those filled in gaps in my list of traveled routes, raising my lowest-numbered untraveled route to 556.

AFAIK, there are no route 556s in NJ, or anywhere else near me. After that, AFAIK I have gaps at 558-559, 563, 567, 572, and 584, before I can reach Mapmikey's turf on the multitude of 6xx signed state secondary routes in Virginia.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 15, 2021, 02:51:19 PM
County routes are for sissies:



































oscar556
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
paulthemapguy207
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 15, 2021, 02:54:33 PM
Quote from: oscar on September 15, 2021, 02:37:12 PM
By short detours on my way to/from visiting friends at the Jersey Shore, I traveled significant parts of three 500-series signed New Jersey county routes. Those filled in gaps in my list of traveled routes, raising my lowest-numbered untraveled route to 556.

AFAIK, there are no route 556s in NJ, or anywhere else near me. After that, AFAIK I have gaps at 558-559, 563, 567, 572, and 584, before I can reach Mapmikey's turf on the multitude of 6xx signed state secondary routes in Virginia.

There's a 556 in Eastern Kentucky.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 15, 2021, 02:55:20 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on September 15, 2021, 02:54:33 PM
Quote from: oscar on September 15, 2021, 02:37:12 PM
By short detours on my way to/from visiting friends at the Jersey Shore, I traveled significant parts of three 500-series signed New Jersey county routes. Those filled in gaps in my list of traveled routes, raising my lowest-numbered untraveled route to 556.

AFAIK, there are no route 556s in NJ, or anywhere else near me. After that, AFAIK I have gaps at 558-559, 563, 567, 572, and 584, before I can reach Mapmikey's turf on the multitude of 6xx signed state secondary routes in Virginia.

There's a 556 in Eastern Kentucky.

We're never going to Get Oscar if you keep helping him.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on September 15, 2021, 04:25:05 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 15, 2021, 02:55:20 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on September 15, 2021, 02:54:33 PM
Quote from: oscar on September 15, 2021, 02:37:12 PM
By short detours on my way to/from visiting friends at the Jersey Shore, I traveled significant parts of three 500-series signed New Jersey county routes. Those filled in gaps in my list of traveled routes, raising my lowest-numbered untraveled route to 556.

AFAIK, there are no route 556s in NJ, or anywhere else near me. After that, AFAIK I have gaps at 558-559, 563, 567, 572, and 584, before I can reach Mapmikey's turf on the multitude of 6xx signed state secondary routes in Virginia.

There's a 556 in Eastern Kentucky.

We're never going to Get Oscar if you keep helping him.

Claiming 479, 499, and 504 would give me a plateau of 500s, until hitting 545. But I'm just not near those specific missing numbers.

I'm trying to avoid the little half-mile numbered county roads but if Oscar gets to 600, then I'll have no choice but to deploy the Cullman County Nuclear Option.

Seriously, if anyone can get to routes number up to 1000, that's quite a remarkable achievement. Even getting to 250-300 is impressive and takes a little work.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on September 15, 2021, 09:06:42 PM
Quote from: oscar on September 15, 2021, 02:37:12 PM
By short detours on my way to/from visiting friends at the Jersey Shore, I traveled significant parts of three 500-series signed New Jersey county routes. Those filled in gaps in my list of traveled routes, raising my lowest-numbered untraveled route to 556.

AFAIK, there are no route 556s in NJ, or anywhere else near me. After that, AFAIK I have gaps at 558-559, 563, 567, 572, and 584, before I can reach Mapmikey's turf on the multitude of 6xx signed state secondary routes in Virginia.

If you drove MD 193 between MD 202 and MD 450 prior to 1985 you have driven MD 556.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 15, 2021, 09:17:21 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on September 15, 2021, 09:06:42 PM
Quote from: oscar on September 15, 2021, 02:37:12 PM
By short detours on my way to/from visiting friends at the Jersey Shore, I traveled significant parts of three 500-series signed New Jersey county routes. Those filled in gaps in my list of traveled routes, raising my lowest-numbered untraveled route to 556.

AFAIK, there are no route 556s in NJ, or anywhere else near me. After that, AFAIK I have gaps at 558-559, 563, 567, 572, and 584, before I can reach Mapmikey's turf on the multitude of 6xx signed state secondary routes in Virginia.

If you drove MD 193 between MD 202 and MD 450 prior to 1985 you have driven MD 556.
Quiet, you. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 16, 2021, 01:52:46 AM
Oscar using county routes is like hearing Barry Bonds used steroids.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 16, 2021, 06:44:47 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 16, 2021, 01:52:46 AM
Oscar using county routes is like hearing Barry Bonds used steroids.
Ouch.

To be honest, I'm just joshing people over using county routes, even though I am sticking to state routes in a loose sense (e.g., I count TX Farm to Market routes and WV/VA secondary routes -- as long as they're shielded.  Stupid little rectangles on stop sign poles don't count. :D).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on September 16, 2021, 08:02:13 AM
Quote from: formulanone on September 15, 2021, 04:25:05 PM
I'm trying to avoid the little half-mile numbered county roads but if Oscar gets to 600, then I'll have no choice but to deploy the Cullman County Nuclear Option.

:-D  :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bruce on September 17, 2021, 01:44:18 AM
It'd be fun to also compare the lowest-numbered route you've yet to clinch. For me, it seems to be 3, but could easily rise to 6 or 14 with another in-state trip.

1: ID
2: US [WA, ID]
3: ...
4: WA
5: I [WA]
6: ...
7: WA
8: WA
9: WA
10: WA
11: WA
12: US [WA]
13: BC
14: ...
15: BC
16: WA
17: ...
18: WA
19: WA
20: ...
21: ...
22: WA
23: ...
24: WA
25: ...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on September 17, 2021, 06:10:36 AM
Quote from: Bruce on September 17, 2021, 01:44:18 AM
It'd be fun to also compare the lowest-numbered route you've yet to clinch. For me, it seems to be 3, but could easily rise to 6 or 14 with another in-state trip.

I made a thread for that a few months back:
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=29493
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 17, 2021, 09:28:05 AM
Quote from: Bruce on September 17, 2021, 01:44:18 AM
It'd be fun to also compare the lowest-numbered route you've yet to clinch. For me, it seems to be 3, but could easily rise to 6 or 14 with

Mine will probably always be 12. Because US 12 exists in the four states closest to me, there is no state highway 12 in any of those states, so I'd either have to clinch the entire US 12 to find some other state with a state highway 12.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 10:21:01 AM
Please keep the clinching talk to the other thread rather than cluttering this one up.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 17, 2021, 10:25:53 AM
Looks like once I complete my trip coming up, I'll be moving all the way up to 361, minus one stupid number, 272.  There is a 272 in the area of Wyoming that I was next going to make a little clinching trip to, so looks like I might have to do that in the coming weekends.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 10:29:46 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 17, 2021, 10:25:53 AM
Looks like once I complete my trip coming up, I'll be moving all the way up to 361, minus one stupid number, 272.  There is a 272 in the area of Wyoming that I was next going to make a little clinching trip to, so looks like I might have to do that in the coming weekends.

Chris
So...you won't be moving up to 361.  Just 272.  :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 17, 2021, 10:44:23 AM
Quote from: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 10:29:46 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 17, 2021, 10:25:53 AM
Looks like once I complete my trip coming up, I'll be moving all the way up to 361, minus one stupid number, 272.  There is a 272 in the area of Wyoming that I was next going to make a little clinching trip to, so looks like I might have to do that in the coming weekends.

Chris
So...you won't be moving up to 361.  Just 272.  :D

But quite temporarily.  :sombrero:  As for when I can get a 361? None even remotely close to me and I have a kid on the way, so that's going to limit the random trips for the sake of roadgeeking.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 10:59:32 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 17, 2021, 10:44:23 AM
Quote from: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 10:29:46 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 17, 2021, 10:25:53 AM
Looks like once I complete my trip coming up, I'll be moving all the way up to 361, minus one stupid number, 272.  There is a 272 in the area of Wyoming that I was next going to make a little clinching trip to, so looks like I might have to do that in the coming weekends.

Chris
So...you won't be moving up to 361.  Just 272.  :D

But quite temporarily.  :sombrero:  As for when I can get a 361? None even remotely close to me and I have a kid on the way, so that's going to limit the random trips for the sake of roadgeeking.

Chris
I have two kids.  Although they can put a damper on travel to some degree, my advice is to train 'em young for road trips.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 17, 2021, 12:31:19 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 10:59:32 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 17, 2021, 10:44:23 AM
Quote from: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 10:29:46 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 17, 2021, 10:25:53 AM
Looks like once I complete my trip coming up, I'll be moving all the way up to 361, minus one stupid number, 272.  There is a 272 in the area of Wyoming that I was next going to make a little clinching trip to, so looks like I might have to do that in the coming weekends.

Chris
So...you won't be moving up to 361.  Just 272.  :D

But quite temporarily.  :sombrero:  As for when I can get a 361? None even remotely close to me and I have a kid on the way, so that's going to limit the random trips for the sake of roadgeeking.

Chris
I have two kids.  Although they can put a damper on travel to some degree, my advice is to train 'em young for road trips.

I think it'll be more the wife dampening for the moment anyway. :)

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on September 17, 2021, 02:30:03 PM
For me: 28
CO 1 (clinched)
US 2
GA 3 (gas)
GA 4 (Pull-off to eat)
I-5
US 6
CO 7
GA 8 (bypassing construction of I-20)
CO 9
I-10
US 11
US 12
WY 13 (pull-off)
CO 14 (clinched)
I-15
US 16
I-17
US 18
US 19 (gas)
I-20
CO 21
CO 22
UT 23
US 24
I-25
US 26
ID 27
No 28
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 02:45:23 PM
Another one for the bottom third of the table:


































oscar556
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
paulthemapguy207
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
74/171FAN89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
jlam28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on September 18, 2021, 10:04:58 AM
I clinched AZ 89 Thursday, and drove some of AZ 89A and US 89.  I am now up to 102.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 19, 2021, 09:21:11 PM
Someone else hits the 102 wall.



































oscar556
formulanone479
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Rothman288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
paulthemapguy207
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
74/171FAN102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
jlam28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on September 19, 2021, 09:39:25 PM
The 102 wall, eh?  If you ever make the drive to Halifax, there's a 102 waiting for you right there.  Illinois has a 102 just south of Chicagoland that can be useful for transferring between I-55 and I-57. A trip to Acadia National Park gives you access to Maine 102.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 20, 2021, 07:25:21 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on September 19, 2021, 09:39:25 PM
The 102 wall, eh?  If you ever make the drive to Halifax, there's a 102 waiting for you right there.  Illinois has a 102 just south of Chicagoland that can be useful for transferring between I-55 and I-57. A trip to Acadia National Park gives you access to Maine 102.

Yeah, that 102 in Illinois isn't far from me. 107 is what I'm stuck on and it's 3 hours to the nearest one in Ohio. I do plan to get over there someday.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 20, 2021, 09:51:39 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on September 19, 2021, 09:39:25 PM
The 102 wall, eh?  If you ever make the drive to Halifax, there's a 102 waiting for you right there.  Illinois has a 102 just south of Chicagoland that can be useful for transferring between I-55 and I-57. A trip to Acadia National Park gives you access to Maine 102.

If you ever fly to Jacksonville, FL102 is Airport Road and you can't really leave the airport without it.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on September 20, 2021, 10:18:29 PM
OK 102 is just east of Oklahoma City, and its northern terminus is OK 66, so it's an easy pickup if you're doing a Route 66 trip.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on September 20, 2021, 10:45:34 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on September 20, 2021, 10:18:29 PM
OK 102 is just east of Oklahoma City, and its northern terminus is OK 66, so it's an easy pickup if you're doing a Route 66 trip.

Isn't OK 102 concurrent with I-40 for a couple miles? That seems like an even easier way to get it.

Utah 102 isn't too hard to grab if you're passing through northern Utah on interstates, as it forms part of the I-15 and I-84 business loops through Tremonton. Although it does not directly interchange with I-15 itself.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on September 21, 2021, 12:09:40 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on September 20, 2021, 07:25:21 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on September 19, 2021, 09:39:25 PM
The 102 wall, eh?  If you ever make the drive to Halifax, there's a 102 waiting for you right there.  Illinois has a 102 just south of Chicagoland that can be useful for transferring between I-55 and I-57. A trip to Acadia National Park gives you access to Maine 102.

Yeah, that 102 in Illinois isn't far from me. 107 is what I'm stuck on and it's 3 hours to the nearest one in Ohio. I do plan to get over there someday.

A drive up US51 anywhere around Wausau allows you the opportunity to detour onto Wisconsin 107 for a bit. It's a shame M-107 got decommissioned poking into the Porcupine Mountains in the UP, because my dad clinched that for me when I was a seven-year-old.  Illinois 107 extends north from I-72 from US54's eastern endpoint. I have a piece of Ohio 107, and a piece of Massachusetts 107 on the way to see the Salem Witch Museum.  Just some ideas for 107...107 is definitely a hard one.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on September 22, 2021, 03:03:12 PM
My plan to get 102 is to do VA/WV 102 after the extension of the King Coal Hwy opens.

I believe after that I will jump to 198 after that which I can get in MD or VA much easier than in PA.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 22, 2021, 03:05:38 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 10:29:46 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 17, 2021, 10:25:53 AM
Looks like once I complete my trip coming up, I'll be moving all the way up to 361, minus one stupid number, 272.  There is a 272 in the area of Wyoming that I was next going to make a little clinching trip to, so looks like I might have to do that in the coming weekends.

Chris
So...you won't be moving up to 361.  Just 272.  :D

Good news.  Wikipedia said PE272 was decommissioned, so I figured I couldn't get it.  But the official PEI Transportation website shows no such thing.  361, here I come.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on September 22, 2021, 09:04:53 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on September 22, 2021, 03:03:12 PM
My plan to get 102 is to do VA/WV 102 after the extension of the King Coal Hwy opens.

I believe after that I will jump to 198 after that which I can get in MD or VA much easier than in PA.

Maine 102 and 198 are both in Acadia National Park.  Two for one!

(https://live.staticflickr.com/1715/25408845024_a7170b2cea_w.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/EHhYoU)
IMG_2403 (https://flic.kr/p/EHhYoU) by Paul Drives (https://www.flickr.com/photos/138603251@N02/), on Flickr
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on September 22, 2021, 09:53:10 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 22, 2021, 03:05:38 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 10:29:46 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 17, 2021, 10:25:53 AM
Looks like once I complete my trip coming up, I'll be moving all the way up to 361, minus one stupid number, 272.  There is a 272 in the area of Wyoming that I was next going to make a little clinching trip to, so looks like I might have to do that in the coming weekends.

Chris
So...you won't be moving up to 361.  Just 272.  :D

Good news.  Wikipedia said PE272 was decommissioned, so I figured I couldn't get it.  But the official PEI Transportation website shows no such thing.  361, here I come.

Travel Mapping includes PE 272 in its highway data. (Nobody has yet claimed any part of that route.) The maintainer for PEI relies on the latest available shapefiles, so I would go with his take rather than Wikipedia's on whether the route still exists.

According to TM, PE 272 intersects TCH 1, about 15 km east of Charlottetown.

BTW, I've clinched WY 272, at least part of PA 272. and all of MD 272.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on September 22, 2021, 10:02:48 PM
There's also a NY 272, which I mentioned over in the "Shortest state highways in multiple counties" thread.  It's a fairly short route at only 7.5 miles, straddling the line between my home county and favorite county for its entire length.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 22, 2021, 10:58:03 PM
Pfft.  Unshielded routes are for sissies.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on September 22, 2021, 11:17:13 PM
Quote from: webny99 on September 22, 2021, 10:02:48 PM
There's also a NY 272, which I mentioned over in the "Shortest state highways in multiple counties" thread.  It's a fairly short route at only 7.5 miles, straddling the line between my home county and favorite county for its entire length.

VA 272 is shorter.  (1.24 miles)  (http://www.vahighways.com/route-log/va261-280.htm)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 23, 2021, 09:14:02 AM
Quote from: oscar on September 22, 2021, 09:53:10 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 22, 2021, 03:05:38 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 17, 2021, 10:29:46 AM
Quote from: jayhawkco on September 17, 2021, 10:25:53 AM
Looks like once I complete my trip coming up, I'll be moving all the way up to 361, minus one stupid number, 272.  There is a 272 in the area of Wyoming that I was next going to make a little clinching trip to, so looks like I might have to do that in the coming weekends.

Chris
So...you won't be moving up to 361.  Just 272.  :D

Good news.  Wikipedia said PE272 was decommissioned, so I figured I couldn't get it.  But the official PEI Transportation website shows no such thing.  361, here I come.

Travel Mapping includes PE 272 in its highway data. (Nobody has yet claimed any part of that route.) The maintainer for PEI relies on the latest available shapefiles, so I would go with his take rather than Wikipedia's on whether the route still exists.

According to TM, PE 272 intersects TCH 1, about 15 km east of Charlottetown.

BTW, I've clinched WY 272, at least part of PA 272. and all of MD 272.

I looked at the traffic volume map for PEi and it's shown there.  It's also signed on GSV.  Good enough for me.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 24, 2021, 07:48:15 PM
DUN Dun dun...dun...

Well, might be as far as I'm going to get.  Given the big holes I've got to catch up to Oscar, I don't think it's going to happen.

Lowest is now 451.

As always, these are just examples of the ones I've touched, rather than a comprehensive set:

SystemNumber
US1
US2
US3
I4
I5
US6
US7
MA8
US9
I10
US11
I12
US13
US14
I15
I16
US17
NY18
US19
I20
MA21
US22
US23
I24
I25
I26
US27
MA28
I29
I30
US31
MA32
MA33
NY34
I35
US36
I37
IA38
I39
I40
US41
NJ42
I43
I44
US45
IN46
MA47
US48
NY49
US50
US51
US52
US53
US54
I55
PA56
I57
US58
I59
US60
MN61
US62
NY63
I64
I65
I66
US67
I68
I69
I70
I71
CT72
I73
I74
I75
I76
I77
I78
I79
I80
I81
I82
I83
I84
I85
I86
I87
I88
I89
I90
I91
UT92
I93
I94
I95
I96
I97
US98
I99
VT100
US101
ME102
NY103
NY104
WI105
PA106
MA107
TN108
NJ109
I110
MA111
MA112
US113
KY114
I115
MA116
US117
TX118
US119
CA120
GA121
KY122
VA123
NH124
VT125
NY126
US127
MA128
US129
US130
US131
MA 132
MO133
VA134
I135
US136
ME137
RI138
TN139
I140
US141
NY142
MA143
NY144
MS145
MA146
MA147
UT148
NY149
US150
NY151
MI152
VT153
UT154
I155
NY156
NY157
US158
MA159
US160
IL161
IN162
US163
MO164
I165
NY166
US167
CA168
US169
NY170
PA171
TN172
CT173
CT174
I175
I176
CT177
CT178
CT179
I180
MA181
I182
MA183
I184
I185
ME186
MD187
CT188
I189
I190
US191
US192
MD193
I194
I195
I196
MD197
NY198
US199
MD200
MD201
US202
CA203
VA204
I205
US206
FL207
NJ208
US209
MD210
US211
MD212
CT213
ME214
I215
NY216
NY217
NY218
US219
I220
US221
US222
US223
US224
MD225
AR226
MD227
NY228
CT229
WV230
US231
VA232
ME233
VA234
I235
ME236
VA237
I238
WY239
I240
VA241
CA242
VA243
SD244
IN245
IN246
PA247
PA248
PA249
US250
NY251
NY252
NY253
TN254
I255
NY256
NY257
US258
US259
NY260
NY261
UT262
NY263
I264
I265
NY266
VA267
TN268
UT269
I270
I271
CT272
DE273
NY274
I275
I276
I277
I278
I279
I280
US281
NY282
I283
TN284
US285
VA286
I287
PA288
NY289
I290
I291
KY292
I293
I294
I295
NY296
NY297
NY298
NY299
NY300
US301
US302
NY303
NY304
WA305
KY306
PA307
NY308
PA309
I310
VA311
NY312
MD313
CT314
PA315
UT316
NY317
TN318
CT319
NY320
US321
US322
OH323
NY324
TN325
NY326
NY327
NY328
NY329
OH330
IN331
NY332
KY333
NY334
MD335
NY336
KY337
TX338
PA339
US340
SC341
NY342
TX LOOP343
NY344
NY345
PA346
CO347
PA348
TX349
NY350
NY351
NY352
NY353
NY354
I355
PA356
OH357
PA358
I359
US360
CT361
NY362
NY363
OH364
NY365
NY366
NY367
OH368
NY369
I370
US371
CT372
NY373
NY374
I375
I376
US377
NY378
OH379
I380
I381
PA382
NY383
I384
US385
NY386
NY387
KY388
AZ389
I390
I391
TN392
I393
I394
I395
NY396
NY397
VA398
TN399
US400
PA401
PA402
NC403
MD404
I405
NY406
LA407
NY408
NY409
I410
US411
US412
VA413
NY414
KY415
NY416
NY417
NY418
NY419
KY420
US421
US422
NY423
PA424
NY425
NY426
NY427
LA428
NY429
I430
US431
WA432
NY433
NY434
PA435
NY436
NY437
PA438
NJ439
I440
US441
FL442
NY443
OH444
PA445
NY446
PA447
NM448
PA449
OH450
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 24, 2021, 07:49:35 PM
I'm number three.  All others are numbers one, two and the ones lower than three.




































oscar556
formulanone479
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
paulthemapguy207
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
dlsterner142
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
74/171FAN102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
jlam28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on September 24, 2021, 08:02:19 PM
Interstates are for sissies.

Congratulations on getting on the podium!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on September 24, 2021, 11:46:54 PM
Quote from: formulanone on September 24, 2021, 08:02:19 PM
Interstates are for sissies.

If you only ever traveled on Interstates, you'd be at the very bottom of this list, since there is no I-1. :P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on September 24, 2021, 11:49:13 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on September 24, 2021, 11:46:54 PM
Quote from: formulanone on September 24, 2021, 08:02:19 PM
Interstates are for sissies.

If you only ever traveled on Interstates, you'd be at the very bottom of this list, since there is no I-1. :P
Would I-H1 count as a "Route 1" for this thread?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 25, 2021, 12:05:46 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on September 24, 2021, 11:49:13 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on September 24, 2021, 11:46:54 PM
Quote from: formulanone on September 24, 2021, 08:02:19 PM
Interstates are for sissies.

If you only ever traveled on Interstates, you'd be at the very bottom of this list, since there is no I-1.
Would I-H1 count as a "Route 1" for this thread?
Only for sissies. :D

Count whatever you want.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on September 26, 2021, 04:21:56 AM
Sorry, Oscar, I just checked, but in India, only NH 52 has child routes in the 5xx.
I was going to say go to India to pick up 556, 557, etc... but they don't exist :(
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on September 26, 2021, 10:01:22 AM
NM 556 is Tramway Blvd, a major arterial beltway through the northeast part of the Albuquerque metropolitan area. I'm shocked he doesn't have that already. I've even clinched it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on September 26, 2021, 10:20:04 AM
Quote from: US 89 on September 26, 2021, 10:01:22 AM
NM 556 is Tramway Blvd, a major arterial beltway through the northeast part of the Albuquerque metropolitan area. I'm shocked he doesn't have that already. I've even clinched it.

My coverage of the Albuquerque area is amazingly thin, especially compared to Santa Fe which I visit much more often. Basically, just the Interstates, the main Historic US 66 segment (former Business I-40), and some decommissioned parts of NM 47.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 29, 2021, 11:43:44 PM
I'm going to nominate a third party to this list.
The mileage leader over on TM is Mapcat (2,300+ miles over Oscar)
I found that he has every number from 1 up to 462.
So Mapcat would be at #3 with him need 463*

*Don't know if Mapcat has traveled MS 463
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on September 29, 2021, 11:57:01 PM
Quote from: oscar on September 26, 2021, 10:20:04 AM
Quote from: US 89 on September 26, 2021, 10:01:22 AM
NM 556 is Tramway Blvd, a major arterial beltway through the northeast part of the Albuquerque metropolitan area. I'm shocked he doesn't have that already. I've even clinched it.

My coverage of the Albuquerque area is amazingly thin, especially compared to Santa Fe which I visit much more often. Basically, just the Interstates, the main Historic US 66 segment (former Business I-40), and some decommissioned parts of NM 47.

Now look at what you did, US 89. He's going to plan a trip to Albuquerque now. :P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on October 02, 2021, 10:52:31 PM
Just returned from a trip to VA and NC.  My previous lowest-numbered route that I haven't been on was 142, but I was able to snag VA 153, VA 142, VA 149, VA 165, and NC 148 (relatively new).

So my new number is 167.

Unfortunately, I'm nowhere near US 167, and the few relatively close SR 167's are inconvenient to get to.  New Jersey's SR 167 is especially ridiculous.  Also will need 183, 184, 186, 194 to get up to 200.

I know I'm never going to be able to catch oscar.  Maybe I should focus on catching Rothman instead ...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 02, 2021, 11:01:37 PM
I am much more catchable than Oscar, given the fact my number isn't moving anytime soon (451s are a ways away) -- got other things to see and travel goals to achieve.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 02, 2021, 11:55:14 PM
It's late.  Hope I did that right...





































oscar556
formulanone479
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
paulthemapguy207
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
74/171FAN102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
jlam28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on October 03, 2021, 08:11:39 AM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 02, 2021, 10:52:31 PM
Just returned from a trip to VA and NC.  My previous lowest-numbered route that I haven't been on was 142, but I was able to snag VA 153, VA 142, VA 149, VA 165, and NC 148 (relatively new).

So my new number is 167.

Unfortunately, I'm nowhere near US 167, and the few relatively close SR 167's are inconvenient to get to.  New Jersey's SR 167 is especially ridiculous.  Also will need 183, 184, 186, 194 to get up to 200.

I know I'm never going to be able to catch oscar.  Maybe I should focus on catching Rothman instead ...

Sounds like a trip to Indiana is in order.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 03, 2021, 09:20:41 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 29, 2021, 11:43:44 PM
So Mapcat would be at #3 with him need 463*

*Don't know if Mapcat has traveled MS 463

Mississippi 463 is the one I have that number as well. Also, Arkansas 463 isn't far from I-555, and Loop 463 goes around Victoria, Texas.

As for 451, my entry is a Farm-to-Market road in northeastern Texas. I'm missing a lot of little 5-10 mile SRs in the greater Orlando area, where SR 451 (Toll) can be found.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on October 03, 2021, 02:51:10 PM
Okay, it seems the lowest numbered route I haven't been on yet is still 18. The official map of the province of Teruel (http://www.dpteruel.es/estatico/recursos/mapaprovincialB.pdf) shows the road marked as TE-18 in OpenStreetMap and TE-19 elsewhere as TE-10. It also shows a TE-18 about as far from me as it gets, that road shows up as TE-31 in OpenStreetMap and TE-32 in Google Maps. And as the map was produced by the same authority which maintains the roads, I'm going by that. So I may pop over the Pyrenees to D18 in the French Department no. 64 (Pyrenees Atlantiques) (which has already given me a 24), however it may be easier for me to reach the other end of Aragon (freeway almost all the way).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 03, 2021, 03:30:03 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on October 03, 2021, 02:51:10 PM
Okay, it seems the lowest numbered route I haven't been on yet is still 18. The official map of the province of Teruel (http://www.dpteruel.es/estatico/recursos/mapaprovincialB.pdf) shows the road marked as TE-18 in OpenStreetMap and TE-19 elsewhere as TE-10. It also shows a TE-18 about as far from me as it gets, that road shows up as TE-31 in OpenStreetMap and TE-32 in Google Maps. And as the map was produced by the same authority which maintains the roads, I'm going by that. So I may pop over the Pyrenees to D18 in the French Department no. 64 (Pyrenees Atlantiques) (which has already given me a 24), however it may be easier for me to reach the other end of Aragon (freeway almost all the way).

Okay...please let us know when your lowest number changes. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 05, 2021, 08:48:54 PM
Picked up 479, 499, 504, and 545 over the past two weeks, so 549 is now my lowest-untraveled number.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TBKS1 on October 05, 2021, 09:03:02 PM
Update 10.05.2021

My lowest is still 39, even though I have a picture of the Arkansas route shield, but it's not the same thing. If I did get it, my next lowest would be 47. I have a photo of MO 47 but again, not the same thing.

39, 47, 48, 54, 56, 58, 68, 83, 94 and 97 are still missing under 100 for me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TBKS1 on October 05, 2021, 09:04:10 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 05, 2021, 08:48:54 PM
Picked up 479, 499, 504, and 545 over the past two weeks, so 549 is now my lowest-untraveled number.

I've actually had 549 before, temporary designation for I-49 in Arkansas which is in the works, although it may not count considering it's a temporary designation.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on October 06, 2021, 11:01:56 AM
Quote from: formulanone on October 05, 2021, 08:48:54 PM
Picked up 479, 499, 504, and 545 over the past two weeks, so 549 is now my lowest-untraveled number.

Back to PA for 549, 550, 551, 553, 554, and 555.   ;-)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 10, 2021, 12:05:59 AM
Quote from: TBKS1 on October 05, 2021, 09:03:02 PM
Update 10.05.2021

My lowest is still 39, even though I have a picture of the Arkansas route shield, but it's not the same thing. If I did get it, my next lowest would be 47. I have a photo of MO 47 but again, not the same thing.

39, 47, 48, 54, 56, 58, 68, 83, 94 and 97 are still missing under 100 for me.
If your lowest number did not change, then there is no update.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 10, 2021, 12:28:54 AM
County highway touchers rise to the top. :D





































oscar556
formulanone549
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
paulthemapguy207
jayhawkco203
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
74/171FAN102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
jlam28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 10, 2021, 08:37:26 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 10, 2021, 12:28:54 AM
County highway touchers rise to the top. :D

I made sure to clinch all 13 miles of CR 479. (Can't really say the same about New Jersey's CR 533). The other four gap numbers were state-maintained.

Rule 26: if someone can count Vermont 26, then anything's allowable.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on October 10, 2021, 08:38:53 AM
Quote from: formulanone on October 10, 2021, 08:37:26 AM
Rule 26: if someone can count Vermont 26, then anything's allowable.

26 isn't a short route. It's a long route that ends just the tiniest bit past the state line.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 10, 2021, 08:40:56 AM
Quote from: 1 on October 10, 2021, 08:38:53 AM
Quote from: formulanone on October 10, 2021, 08:37:26 AM
Rule 26: if someone can count Vermont 26, then anything's allowable.

26 isn't a short route. It's a long route that ends just the tiniest bit past the state line.

The part in Vermont is only 69 feet long; my point is that could be counted by itself.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on October 10, 2021, 04:49:47 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on September 22, 2021, 03:03:12 PM
My plan to get 102 is to do VA/WV 102 after the extension of the King Coal Hwy opens.

I believe after that I will jump to 198 after that which I can get in MD or VA much easier than in PA.

So I found NY 102 yesterday as part of my non-attendance (and attendance) at the Atlantic Beach Meet.  Put me at 198 unless I state otherwise.

EDIT (10-13-2021):  I was able to clarify that I am at 198. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: RoadRebel on October 13, 2021, 11:32:09 AM
For me it's 2. I have driven right past NC-2 on US-1 many times, but I've never ventured into Pinehurst. NC-5 is also in the Pinehurst area, along with the eastern terminus of NC-73, a road I'd like to complete. I have already driven the entirety of it west of the Pee Dee River. Also, there is the huge roundabout in Pinehurst. Definitely doing a full loop on that!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 13, 2021, 12:06:06 PM
Mid and low range movements in the pack...10 roadgeeks stuck at 2.  I believe MA 2 was my first touch there at a young age (6 or so).





































oscar556
formulanone549
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
paulthemapguy207
jayhawkco203
74/171FAN198
Hot Rod Hootenanny192
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
jlam28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on October 13, 2021, 05:04:58 PM
So many roadgeeks stuck at 2. And I have one readily available less than a hour from me :sombrero:.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 14, 2021, 11:04:09 PM
In traveling from New York (the state) to Pennsylvania today, I picked off 192, 200, 214, & 216.
My new lowest is now 217
(and gets me back in front of 74/171 fan, Jayhawk, and Paul's maps)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 14, 2021, 11:20:28 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 13, 2021, 12:06:06 PM
Mid and low range movements in the pack...10 roadgeeks stuck at 2.  I believe MA 2 was my first touch there at a young age (6 or so).


I would have been stuck at 14 from age 13 till age 25 (and the beginnings of roadfan.com). But that's pre internet and digital roadgeek discovery.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on October 15, 2021, 12:19:06 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 14, 2021, 11:04:09 PM
In traveling from New York (the state) to Pennsylvania today, I picked off 192, 200, 214, & 216.
My new lowest is now 217
(and gets me back in front of 74/171 fan, Jayhawk, and Paul's maps)

Michigan has a 217 right along the Indiana border with easy access to I-80/90.  I have no idea what to do to get 214, though (my next missing number above 207).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on October 15, 2021, 07:28:53 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on October 15, 2021, 12:19:06 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 14, 2021, 11:04:09 PM
In traveling from New York (the state) to Pennsylvania today, I picked off 192, 200, 214, & 216.
My new lowest is now 217
(and gets me back in front of 74/171 fan, Jayhawk, and Paul's maps)

Michigan has a 217 right along the Indiana border with easy access to I-80/90.  I have no idea what to do to get 214, though (my next missing number above 207).

There's a KY 214 in far south-central Kentucky. Don't know of anything that would be closer.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on October 15, 2021, 08:16:08 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on October 15, 2021, 12:19:06 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 14, 2021, 11:04:09 PM
In traveling from New York (the state) to Pennsylvania today, I picked off 192, 200, 214, & 216.
My new lowest is now 217
(and gets me back in front of 74/171 fan, Jayhawk, and Paul's maps)

Michigan has a 217 right along the Indiana border with easy access to I-80/90.  I have no idea what to do to get 214, though (my next missing number above 207).

There is also PA 217 that accesses US 22/US 219 in Blairsville if you want to do a Pittsburgh loop after clinching the extended PA 576.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 15, 2021, 01:08:47 PM
The Hootenanny hot rods.






































oscar556
formulanone549
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
Hot Rod Hootenanny217
paulthemapguy207
jayhawkco203
74/171FAN198
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
jlam28
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on October 15, 2021, 02:15:17 PM
I would like to update mine, as I've just been on UT 28 in Nephi. It now goes to 38.
UT 28 in Nephi
I-29
US 30
MO 31
Hennepin County Road 32
SC 33 (short stint in Orangeburg)
US 34
I-35
US 36
MN 37
No 38
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 15, 2021, 09:29:34 PM
Oh, Black Betty, bam jlam...







































oscar556
formulanone549
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
Hot Rod Hootenanny217
paulthemapguy207
jayhawkco203
74/171FAN198
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
jlam38
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on October 16, 2021, 02:33:21 PM
No new updates, but here's a list I drew to show an example of every route number I've driven on up to 250.  Click to see in more detail.  This was all, as you can see, handwritten just for fun.

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51593406973_a4a6aa1dda_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2mB8Gpx)
Route numbers to 250 (https://flic.kr/p/2mB8Gpx) by Paul Drives (https://www.flickr.com/photos/138603251@N02/), on Flickr
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on October 16, 2021, 06:09:05 PM
Got all the routes I thought I would on my road trip as far as this "contest" is concerned.  Up to 361 for the lowest I haven't been on.  There was CT361 within 45 minutes of my drive today, but I elected to pass it by to get more interstate mileage instead.  I'll get it eventually, somewhere.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on October 16, 2021, 07:12:27 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on October 16, 2021, 06:09:05 PM
Got all the routes I thought I would on my road trip as far as this "contest" is concerned.  Up to 361 for the lowest I haven't been on.  There was CT361 within 45 minutes of my drive today, but I elected to pass it by to get more interstate mileage instead.  I'll get it eventually, somewhere.

Chris

There's one near Reno if you need an excuse for a Casino trip.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 18, 2021, 12:19:20 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on October 15, 2021, 12:19:06 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 14, 2021, 11:04:09 PM
In traveling from New York (the state) to Pennsylvania today, I picked off 192, 200, 214, & 216.
My new lowest is now 217
(and gets me back in front of 74/171 fan, Jayhawk, and Paul's maps)

Michigan has a 217 right along the Indiana border with easy access to I-80/90.  I have no idea what to do to get 214, though (my next missing number above 207).

Ohio has a 217 near its southern tip. I'll get there (eventually).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 18, 2021, 06:03:45 PM
Picked up Florida SR 549 today, so I'm up to 554 as my lowest.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on October 18, 2021, 06:28:59 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 18, 2021, 06:03:45 PM
Picked up Florida SR 549 today, so I'm up to 554 as my lowest.

Getting tight at the top!

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 18, 2021, 07:54:49 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on October 18, 2021, 06:28:59 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 18, 2021, 06:03:45 PM
Picked up Florida SR 549 today, so I'm up to 554 as my lowest.

Getting tight at the top!

Chris

I don't think I'll be near a route 554 anytime soon, so it might be a while...

...oddly, I didn't know Florida 549 existed until about 10 days ago.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 18, 2021, 11:01:53 PM
Movement towards the top now...looks like someone could Get Oscar...




































oscar556
formulanone554
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
Hot Rod Hootenanny217
paulthemapguy207
74/171FAN198
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
jlam38
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on October 18, 2021, 11:19:05 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 18, 2021, 07:54:49 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on October 18, 2021, 06:28:59 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 18, 2021, 06:03:45 PM
Picked up Florida SR 549 today, so I'm up to 554 as my lowest.

Getting tight at the top!

Chris

I don't think I'll be near a route 554 anytime soon, so it might be a while...

...oddly, I didn't know Florida 549 existed until about 10 days ago.
It looks like in the US, you can choose between LA 554 and PA 554.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on October 18, 2021, 11:36:06 PM
Quote from: jlam on October 18, 2021, 11:19:05 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 18, 2021, 07:54:49 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on October 18, 2021, 06:28:59 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 18, 2021, 06:03:45 PM
Picked up Florida SR 549 today, so I'm up to 554 as my lowest.

Getting tight at the top!

Chris

I don't think I'll be near a route 554 anytime soon, so it might be a while...

...oddly, I didn't know Florida 549 existed until about 10 days ago.
It looks like in the US, you can choose between LA 554 and PA 554.

Looking at TM data, I also see KY 554, NM 554, and OH 554, plus a Texas FM 554.

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on October 19, 2021, 09:53:19 AM
I don't know how accurate it is, but Wikipedia has pages "List of highways numbered xxx" for all the numbers we are chasing.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on October 19, 2021, 09:56:28 AM
Quote from: cabiness42 on October 19, 2021, 09:53:19 AM
I don't know how accurate it is, but Wikipedia has pages "List of highways numbered xxx" for all the numbers we are chasing.

That's what I've been using.  I thought I had a 361 in Minnesota because of that, but alas it has been decommissioned and not marked as such on the 361 Wikipage.

Chris
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on October 19, 2021, 12:25:55 PM
Yes, for my 554 claim, I was using this page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highways_numbered_554 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highways_numbered_554)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on October 19, 2021, 04:56:03 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on October 19, 2021, 09:53:19 AM
I don't know how accurate it is, but Wikipedia has pages "List of highways numbered xxx" for all the numbers we are chasing.

Not 100% accurate.  Was looking for a 148 recently; the closest listed one to me was a short VA 148 in Virginia.  But during a recent road trip I passed right by a NC 148 which wasn't on the Wikipedia page.  Fortunately I had the presence of mind to snag it.

To user Jim - might it be possible to provide a way to search the database for occurrences of a specified number?  Looking for a 167 right about now :)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on October 19, 2021, 05:34:37 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 19, 2021, 04:56:03 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on October 19, 2021, 09:53:19 AM
I don't know how accurate it is, but Wikipedia has pages "List of highways numbered xxx" for all the numbers we are chasing.

Not 100% accurate.  Was looking for a 148 recently; the closest listed one to me was a short VA 148 in Virginia.  But during a recent road trip I passed right by a NC 148 which wasn't on the Wikipedia page.  Fortunately I had the presence of mind to snag it.

To user Jim - might it be possible to provide a way to search the database for occurrences of a specified number?  Looking for a 167 right about now :)

There's one in Indiana.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 19, 2021, 05:45:13 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on October 19, 2021, 05:34:37 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 19, 2021, 04:56:03 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on October 19, 2021, 09:53:19 AM
I don't know how accurate it is, but Wikipedia has pages "List of highways numbered xxx" for all the numbers we are chasing.

Not 100% accurate.  Was looking for a 148 recently; the closest listed one to me was a short VA 148 in Virginia.  But during a recent road trip I passed right by a NC 148 which wasn't on the Wikipedia page.  Fortunately I had the presence of mind to snag it.

To user Jim - might it be possible to provide a way to search the database for occurrences of a specified number?  Looking for a 167 right about now :)

There's one in Indiana.

There are actually quite a number of 167s around the country.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on October 19, 2021, 05:53:36 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 19, 2021, 05:45:13 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on October 19, 2021, 05:34:37 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 19, 2021, 04:56:03 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on October 19, 2021, 09:53:19 AM
I don't know how accurate it is, but Wikipedia has pages "List of highways numbered xxx" for all the numbers we are chasing.

Not 100% accurate.  Was looking for a 148 recently; the closest listed one to me was a short VA 148 in Virginia.  But during a recent road trip I passed right by a NC 148 which wasn't on the Wikipedia page.  Fortunately I had the presence of mind to snag it.

To user Jim - might it be possible to provide a way to search the database for occurrences of a specified number?  Looking for a 167 right about now :)

There's one in Indiana.

There are actually quite a number of 167s around the country.

Thanks for the suggestions, although I've pretty much settled on VA 167 as the least annoying "167" to get.  It's just off I-81 near Roanoke, which is reasonable for me to travel.  Other 167's that may be closer are out in the middle of East B.F.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 19, 2021, 05:55:02 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 19, 2021, 05:53:36 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 19, 2021, 05:45:13 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on October 19, 2021, 05:34:37 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 19, 2021, 04:56:03 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on October 19, 2021, 09:53:19 AM
I don't know how accurate it is, but Wikipedia has pages "List of highways numbered xxx" for all the numbers we are chasing.

Not 100% accurate.  Was looking for a 148 recently; the closest listed one to me was a short VA 148 in Virginia.  But during a recent road trip I passed right by a NC 148 which wasn't on the Wikipedia page.  Fortunately I had the presence of mind to snag it.

To user Jim - might it be possible to provide a way to search the database for occurrences of a specified number?  Looking for a 167 right about now :)

There's one in Indiana.

There are actually quite a number of 167s around the country.

Thanks for the suggestions, although I've pretty much settled on VA 167 as the least annoying "167" to get.  It's just off I-81 near Roanoke, which is reasonable for me to travel.  Other 167's that may be closer are out in the middle of East B.F.

Don't be a sissy.  Go out and get US 167.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on November 19, 2021, 06:54:09 PM
My lowest-numbered untraveled route is now 609. My latest trip to Louisiana, via Ohio, filled in all my gaps in the high 500s. It helped that all the routes I needed in Louisiana were in the northern part of the state, with three intersecting US 425 which was part of my route to the New Orleans area.

In the 600s, I'm including Virginia SR 606 near Dulles Airport. That was a road I long ago traveled at high speeds, when I was young and stupid, and before new development north of the airport made it less speeder-friendly. I'm also including two SR 600s, which are continuations of two primary Virginia routes. I mostly likely drove part of one or both SR 600s before I realized the route number had changed, and turned around.

If Mapmikey can get his lowest untraveled route into the 600s, he might be able to quickly overtake me, since I think he's more extensively covered the Virginia secondary routes than I have.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 19, 2021, 07:25:27 PM
This game gets pretty silly in the 600s. 




































oscar609
formulanone554
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
Hot Rod Hootenanny217
paulthemapguy207
74/171FAN198
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
amroad17107
cabiness42107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
jlam38
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on November 19, 2021, 11:52:18 PM
Quote from: oscar on November 19, 2021, 06:54:09 PM
My latest trip to Louisiana, via Ohio...

I thought I was the only roadgeek who had legit reasons to travel from Ohio to Louisiana. :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Road Hog on November 20, 2021, 01:19:14 AM
Anyone who claims to never have been on AR 980 flies straight to the top.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 20, 2021, 01:55:10 AM
Quote from: Road Hog on November 20, 2021, 01:19:14 AM
Anyone who claims to never have been on AR 980 flies straight to the top.
Only it they've been on the other 979...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on November 20, 2021, 10:12:30 AM
Quote from: oscar on November 19, 2021, 06:54:09 PM

If Mapmikey can get his lowest untraveled route into the 600s, he might be able to quickly overtake me, since I think he's more extensively covered the Virginia secondary routes than I have.

it'll be a while...I'm missing 54 different numbers to reach 600.  But yes, if I get there, I will rocket through the 600s and a lot of 700s, too.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on November 20, 2021, 11:38:26 AM
Is there an over/under betting line for how many months it will take oscar to pass 1000?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on November 20, 2021, 01:00:36 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on November 20, 2021, 10:12:30 AM
Quote from: oscar on November 19, 2021, 06:54:09 PM

If Mapmikey can get his lowest untraveled route into the 600s, he might be able to quickly overtake me, since I think he's more extensively covered the Virginia secondary routes than I have.

it'll be a while...I'm missing 54 different numbers to reach 600.  But yes, if I get there, I will rocket through the 600s and a lot of 700s, too.

But then I'll have to rename the file I'm keeping my notes about this in from getoscar.txt...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on November 20, 2021, 01:05:31 PM
I looked back at my New England trip from June and realized I got a 107 in New Hampshire, so I'm at 108 right now.

Have a couple trips planned that would net me 108, 125, 133, 147 and 154 in Illinois, so I'd then be up to 174.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on November 20, 2021, 09:20:38 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on November 20, 2021, 01:05:31 PM
I looked back at my New England trip from June and realized I got a 107 in New Hampshire, so I'm at 108 right now.

Have a couple trips planned that would net me 108, 125, 133, 147 and 154 in Illinois, so I'd then be up to 174.

As an Illinois resident, good luck with the 174 when you get to it.  I took a detour in south-central Virginia to get my 174.  I don't think there's another 174 anywhere in IN-MI-IL-WI...OH has one in the northeast part of the state.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on November 20, 2021, 09:38:30 PM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on November 20, 2021, 09:20:38 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on November 20, 2021, 01:05:31 PM
I looked back at my New England trip from June and realized I got a 107 in New Hampshire, so I'm at 108 right now.

Have a couple trips planned that would net me 108, 125, 133, 147 and 154 in Illinois, so I'd then be up to 174.

As an Illinois resident, good luck with the 174 when you get to it.  I took a detour in south-central Virginia to get my 174.  I don't think there's another 174 anywhere in IN-MI-IL-WI...OH has one in the northeast part of the state.

Yeah, I'll have to make a Cleveland trip sometime to get 174.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Big John on November 20, 2021, 09:47:23 PM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on November 20, 2021, 09:20:38 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on November 20, 2021, 01:05:31 PM
I looked back at my New England trip from June and realized I got a 107 in New Hampshire, so I'm at 108 right now.

Have a couple trips planned that would net me 108, 125, 133, 147 and 154 in Illinois, so I'd then be up to 174.

As an Illinois resident, good luck with the 174 when you get to it.  I took a detour in south-central Virginia to get my 174.  I don't think there's another 174 anywhere in IN-MI-IL-WI...OH has one in the northeast part of the state.
There was a highway 174 in Kenosha County, WI, but it was decommissioned in 1990.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 20, 2021, 09:48:10 PM
Worst game of "tell the difference" ever, comparing this one to the last one.  Highlights Magazine would be proud.





































oscar609
formulanone554
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
Hot Rod Hootenanny217
paulthemapguy207
74/171FAN198
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
jlam38
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on November 21, 2021, 08:34:38 AM
Quote from: Rothman on November 20, 2021, 01:55:10 AM
Quote from: Road Hog on November 20, 2021, 01:19:14 AM
Anyone who claims to never have been on AR 980 flies straight to the top.
Only it they've been on the other 979...

There is also PA 980, which I have personally clinched along with at least 7 others according to Travel Mapping.

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on November 22, 2021, 05:36:44 PM
Quote from: Rothman on November 20, 2021, 01:55:10 AM
Quote from: Road Hog on November 20, 2021, 01:19:14 AM
Anyone who claims to never have been on AR 980 flies straight to the top.
Only it they've been on the other 979...

Also, with 30 or so AR 980s (all connecting small airports to the rest of the Arkansas highway system) (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arkansas_980(Airport).svg), if you do any off-Interstate traveling in Arkansas, you'll soon stumble on at least one of them. But, as Rothman notes, finding an AR 980 is the easy part.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on November 29, 2021, 06:52:28 PM
I am up to 200 now.  I guess I need to go clinch some toll road in Maryland next weekend...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on November 29, 2021, 08:06:27 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on November 29, 2021, 06:52:28 PM
I am up to 200 now.  I guess I need to go clinch some toll road in Maryland next weekend...

If you need 201 and/or 202, they're in the general vicinity of 200.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on November 30, 2021, 06:59:33 AM
Quote from: dlsterner on November 29, 2021, 08:06:27 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on November 29, 2021, 06:52:28 PM
I am up to 200 now.  I guess I need to go clinch some toll road in Maryland next weekend...

If you need 201 and/or 202, they're in the general vicinity of 200.

I already have MD 201 and then US 202.  The next one I will need is 203 which I think I will end up doing VA 203 in the Northern Neck.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 30, 2021, 09:23:24 AM
Well, that was easy.





































oscar609
formulanone554
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
Hot Rod Hootenanny217
paulthemapguy207
74/171FAN200
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
jlam38
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on November 30, 2021, 05:12:07 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on November 30, 2021, 06:59:33 AM
Quote from: dlsterner on November 29, 2021, 08:06:27 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on November 29, 2021, 06:52:28 PM
I am up to 200 now.  I guess I need to go clinch some toll road in Maryland next weekend...

If you need 201 and/or 202, they're in the general vicinity of 200.

I already have MD 201 and then US 202.  The next one I will need is 203 which I think I will end up doing VA 203 in the Northern Neck.

I need 203 as well, and plan to get VA 203 soon.  Also VA 204 and VA 205 are in that area, so I will try to snag those as well.  I try to look about 50 places ahead of the next one I need (which is 167).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on November 30, 2021, 05:40:21 PM
Apparently I've been on AR 38 going to Robbie's Tool Supply near Widener, so my lowest rises to 42.

AR 38: from I-40 to US70
CO 39: Clinched
I-40: from Gallup to Albuquerque and in Amarillo
US41: Wendy's stop south of Atlanta
No 42

Once I get to Louisville, Colorado and get CO42, then it would be 43, with none of those near me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on November 30, 2021, 05:48:09 PM
Quote from: jlam on November 30, 2021, 05:40:21 PM
Once I get to Louisville, Colorado and get CO42, then it would be 43, with none of those near me.

If you ever go east on I-70 to Kansas City or thereabouts, there's K-43 that intersects the interstate near Abilene.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 30, 2021, 07:52:19 PM
Bam a jlam a ding dong!






































oscar609
formulanone554
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
Hot Rod Hootenanny217
paulthemapguy207
74/171FAN200
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
jlam42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
stevashe19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on November 30, 2021, 08:03:01 PM
Quote from: jlam on November 30, 2021, 05:40:21 PM
Apparently I've been on AR 38 going to Robbie's Tool Supply near Widener, so my lowest rises to 42.

...

Once I get to Louisville, Colorado and get CO42, then it would be 43, with none of those near me.
I stopped reading at "Louisville"  and was thinking "get US 42 while you're there" , not realizing that you wrote Colorado right after.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: stevashe on December 03, 2021, 11:13:50 PM
I picked up WA 19 recently, so I'm stuck at 29 now. Same as one of my fellow Wshingtonians, Bruce.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on December 05, 2021, 10:01:01 AM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on November 30, 2021, 06:59:33 AM
Quote from: dlsterner on November 29, 2021, 08:06:27 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on November 29, 2021, 06:52:28 PM
I am up to 200 now.  I guess I need to go clinch some toll road in Maryland next weekend...

If you need 201 and/or 202, they're in the general vicinity of 200.

I already have MD 201 and then US 202.  The next one I will need is 203 which I think I will end up doing VA 203 in the Northern Neck.

I am officially up to 203 since I clinched MD 200 yesterday.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 10, 2021, 03:16:50 PM
Yawn, belated.






































oscar609
formulanone554
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
Hot Rod Hootenanny217
paulthemapguy207
74/171FAN203
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
jlam42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on December 13, 2021, 06:16:57 AM
I drove on Kentucky 554 this past weekend, so I'm now at 558 as my lowest.

Still about 7-8 numbers back from catching Oscar.

Edit: Rothman, you may as well just edit your post above this one.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on December 17, 2021, 04:46:08 PM
I clinched VA 203 and VA 215 yesterday so I am now up to 217.  (PA 217 better be ready...)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bruce on December 17, 2021, 07:01:23 PM
Quote from: stevashe on December 03, 2021, 11:13:50 PM
I picked up WA 19 recently, so I'm stuck at 29 now. Same as one of my fellow Wshingtonians, Bruce.

Looks like our closest options are CA-29 in the Bay Area and ID-29 near Butte, MT.

Unless we can count the TV Highway (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tualatin_Valley_Highway), which is Highway 29 but not signed as such because of Oregon's weird system.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 17, 2021, 07:08:57 PM
Nickel and diming...







































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
Hot Rod Hootenanny217
74/171FAN217
paulthemapguy207
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
jlam42
TBKS139
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
ketchup9931
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ketchup99 on December 18, 2021, 12:47:34 AM
I was previously at 31, but picked up PA-31 near Bedford driving home from college.
- NY-32 in Central Valley
- US-33 in Virginia
- PA-34 near Newport
- PA-35 near Mifflintown
- NJ-36 on the Jersey Shore
- VA-37 around Winchester
That should take me to 38. I don't believe I've been on one, but PA-38 parallels I-80 west of me, so that should be easy next time I head west.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on December 18, 2021, 01:37:25 PM
If you count officially designated county roads, then I have been on Dakota-Scott County Road 42 from I-35W to its western terminus. I have also traveled:

MS 43 for a short distance on the Kosciusko Bypass concurrent with MS 19
I-44 from US 287 to BUS 287 in Wichita Falls
US 45 from US 72 in Corinth, MS to I-40 in Jackson, TN
UT 46 from US 191 to La Sal
NE 47 from I-80 to downtown Gothenburg
UT 48 from I-15 to Cottonwood Street
ND 49 from the SD border to ND 21 in Elgin
US 50 from Loma, CO to Green River, UT
WY 51 in the short distance between the I-80 ramps in Gillette
CO 52, various segments
Link NE 53B in its entirety
No 54

Interestingly, it seems to now be 54, although I have traveled near US 54 quite a bit.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 19, 2021, 10:37:33 PM
Aserejé, ja deje de jebe tu de jebere
Sebiunouva majavi an de bugui an de buididipi...

jlam's joined the ranks of the county-route counting sissies.







































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
corco329
Konza316
cl94288
Duke87265
deathtopumpkins239
Hot Rod Hootenanny217
74/171FAN217
paulthemapguy207
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
jlam54
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on December 20, 2021, 07:48:01 PM
Went into West Virginia and Southern Ohio today, and along the way picked up enough numbers so that my lowest number is now 246.
That means I jump the Pumpkin killer and untie with Travel Mapping's favorite nitpicker.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on December 21, 2021, 03:01:44 PM
Just wanted to cut in and say that I'm not a sissy that counts the county routes.

that is all
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on December 21, 2021, 05:25:30 PM
County Road Toucher really sounds like a creepy insult:

"I bet you even look at those rural single-lane routes in Google Street View at night, you lecherous county road toucher!"

[insert suspenseful music]

"Baby, it's not like that! I'm a full-length interstate man..."

"I've looked at your bookmarks...the screen captures! the Saved Places! those late afternoon drives!"

[sobs]

"Let me make it up to you. How about I only touch mile markers, will that help our relationship?"

Tune in next week to Chapter 67 of: She Married a Roadgeek, But At Least He's Not Married to the Sea
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on December 21, 2021, 08:10:25 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on December 20, 2021, 07:48:01 PM
Went into West Virginia and Southern Ohio today, and along the way picked up enough numbers so that my lowest number is now 246.
That means I jump the Pumpkin killer and untie with Travel Mapping's favorite nitpicker.

Of course, I just realized that I was not nitpicky enough to sneak in VA 217 when I drove I-81 right by it in Marion in September.  Oh well, forcing myself to drive PA 217 gives me a lot more mileage.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on December 29, 2021, 09:35:49 PM
I'm not a sissy that counts county routes, but the lowest number I have not been on has increased to 330 as of today. Drove both VA 288 and VA 323, which were my lowest undriven numbers.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on December 30, 2021, 07:22:49 AM
Quote from: cl94 on December 29, 2021, 09:35:49 PM
I'm not a sissy that counts county routes, but the lowest number I have not been on has increased to 330 as of today. Drove both VA 288 and VA 323, which were my lowest undriven numbers.

Is VA 323 fully reopen now?  I was going to clinch it in July, but it was closed at the northern end so I skipped it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on December 30, 2021, 08:26:52 AM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on December 30, 2021, 07:22:49 AM
Quote from: cl94 on December 29, 2021, 09:35:49 PM
I'm not a sissy that counts county routes, but the lowest number I have not been on has increased to 330 as of today. Drove both VA 288 and VA 323, which were my lowest undriven numbers.

Is VA 323 fully reopen now?  I was going to clinch it in July, but it was closed at the northern end so I skipped it.

Fully reopen, but there was a slight realignment at the north end.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 30, 2021, 09:05:30 AM
A couple of movements now accounted for...









































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
cl94330
corco329
Konza316
Duke87265
Hot Rod Hootenanny246
deathtopumpkins239
74/171FAN217
paulthemapguy207
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
Eth63
SkyPesos58
jlam54
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: csw on January 02, 2022, 04:48:29 PM
Add me to the list of anti-county route participants. I went 40 minutes out of my way to drive on OH 182, only to find it has demoted to a county route. One of the few times my DeLorme has led me astray.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 02, 2022, 04:53:03 PM
Quote from: csw on January 02, 2022, 04:48:29 PM
Add me to the list of anti-county route participants. I went 40 minutes out of my way to drive on OH 182, only to find it has demoted to a county route. One of the few times my DeLorme has led me astray.

Ouch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_State_Route_182
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on January 02, 2022, 04:59:15 PM
Either I Get Oscar or the county routes go out the window. Can't have it both ways.

Of course, then it becomes Get None.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on January 02, 2022, 05:31:13 PM
I'm not counting all county routes, just the ones on the Wikipedia page "Routes numbered "Ëœx'"
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on January 02, 2022, 05:36:30 PM
Quote from: jlam on January 02, 2022, 05:31:13 PM
I'm not counting all county routes, just the ones on the Wikipedia page "Routes numbered "Ëœx'"

Maybe I'll start editing Wiki pages. :)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on January 02, 2022, 05:50:09 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on January 02, 2022, 05:36:30 PM
Quote from: jlam on January 02, 2022, 05:31:13 PM
I'm not counting all county routes, just the ones on the Wikipedia page "Routes numbered "Ëœx'"

Maybe I'll start editing Wiki pages. :)
I can revert.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on January 02, 2022, 07:18:48 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 02, 2022, 04:59:15 PM
Either I Get Oscar or the county routes go out the window. Can't have it both ways.

Of course, then it becomes Get None.

Mind you, Oscar has admitted to taking steroids, errr, using county routes, to pad his total as well.
Maybe we should volunteer one of the autistic kids to go spend a week counting all the routes Oscar has tallied over on 'Travel Mapping.'
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on January 02, 2022, 07:31:19 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on January 02, 2022, 07:18:48 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 02, 2022, 04:59:15 PM
Either I Get Oscar or the county routes go out the window. Can't have it both ways.

Of course, then it becomes Get None.

Mind you, Oscar has admitted to taking steroids, errr, using county routes, to pad his total as well.
Maybe we should volunteer one of the autistic kids to go spend a week counting all the routes Oscar has tallied over on 'Travel Mapping.'

Well I wonder how oscar is only at 609 then.  Any number between 600 and 650 (maybe even up to 700) exists in practically every VA county (minus Henrico and Arlington of course).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 02, 2022, 08:19:45 PM
Hope Oscar doesn't mind my running TM's "RoutesByNumber" program on his data.  Using oscar.list in TM (which would be minus any concurrencies that might be auto-detected during the site update), the following is reported:

Numbers up to 999 for which no entries are found:
386 399 437 455 461 492 498 539 548 551 554 600 606 609 616 617 620 621 622 626 628 629 631 633 634 643 644 645 649 651 654 657 660 661 668 677 679 683 685 689 692 698 709 718 719 720 721 722 724 726 727 728 731 733 734 737 738 741 744 745 746 747 748 749 751 752 754 757 761 762 767 768 769 771 777 779 782 783 784 788 791 792 793 796 797 798 799 801 803 813 819 828 830 831 839 843 846 853 854 855 859 861 862 863 864 866 868 871 873 875 876 883 885 888 889 892 893 898 899 900 902 904 908 913 917 918 919 920 923 926 927 928 929 935 937 938 939 941 942 943 945 947 949 950 952 957 958 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 971 974 975 977 978 979 981 982 983 984 987 988 991 993 995 996 999


He has a comment in the file that he had clinched VA 386 and VA 399 while they existed.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on January 02, 2022, 08:45:24 PM
Quote from: Jim on January 02, 2022, 08:19:45 PM
Hope Oscar doesn't mind my running TM's "RoutesByNumber" program on his data.  Using oscar.list in TM (which would be minus any concurrencies that might be auto-detected during the site update), the following is reported:

Numbers up to 999 for which no entries are found:
386 399 437 455 461 492 498 539 548 551 554 600 606 609 616 617 620 621 622 626 628 629 631 633 634 643 644 645 649 651 654 657 660 661 668 677 679 683 685 689 692 698 709 718 719 720 721 722 724 726 727 728 731 733 734 737 738 741 744 745 746 747 748 749 751 752 754 757 761 762 767 768 769 771 777 779 782 783 784 788 791 792 793 796 797 798 799 801 803 813 819 828 830 831 839 843 846 853 854 855 859 861 862 863 864 866 868 871 873 875 876 883 885 888 889 892 893 898 899 900 902 904 908 913 917 918 919 920 923 926 927 928 929 935 937 938 939 941 942 943 945 947 949 950 952 957 958 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 971 974 975 977 978 979 981 982 983 984 987 988 991 993 995 996 999


He has a comment in the file that he had clinched VA 386 and VA 399 while they existed.


Oscar could have those numbers "clinched" in Mississippi...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 02, 2022, 08:50:25 PM
Of course, I'm not questioning Oscar's honesty on this.  Someone asked if we could see how many of his numbers show up in TM clinches.  Fortunately, it took just a minutes or two, not a week.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: csw on January 02, 2022, 08:52:44 PM
I think it's more likely that Oscar has actually driven every square inch of pavement on the North American continent and is just playing along so the rest of us don't feel bad.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on January 02, 2022, 08:53:01 PM
I'm not counting county routes. I am counting decommissioned highways IF I drove on them before being decommissioned.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on January 02, 2022, 09:05:48 PM
Quote from: Jim on January 02, 2022, 08:19:45 PM
Hope Oscar doesn't mind my running TM's "RoutesByNumber" program on his data.  Using oscar.list in TM (which would be minus any concurrencies that might be auto-detected during the site update), the following is reported:

Numbers up to 999 for which no entries are found:
386 399 437 455 461 492 498 539 548 551 554 600 606 609 616 617 620 621 622 626 628 629 631 633 634 643 644 645 649 651 654 657 660 661 668 677 679 683 685 689 692 698 709 718 719 720 721 722 724 726 727 728 731 733 734 737 738 741 744 745 746 747 748 749 751 752 754 757 761 762 767 768 769 771 777 779 782 783 784 788 791 792 793 796 797 798 799 801 803 813 819 828 830 831 839 843 846 853 854 855 859 861 862 863 864 866 868 871 873 875 876 883 885 888 889 892 893 898 899 900 902 904 908 913 917 918 919 920 923 926 927 928 929 935 937 938 939 941 942 943 945 947 949 950 952 957 958 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 971 974 975 977 978 979 981 982 983 984 987 988 991 993 995 996 999

He has a comment in the file that he had clinched VA 386 and VA 399 while they existed.

That confirms that my count doesn't include any county routes under 400, and only a few 4xx and 5xx county routes, since Travel Mapping ignores non-freeway county routes. Maryland, Ohio, Florida, Louisiana, Newfoundland/Labrador, Ontario freeways, and the Interstate/U.S. routes account for most of the 4xx/5xx routes I've traveled.

My list file doesn't yet have any entries for Mississippi state routes, or Texas farm-to-market routes (not yet mapped in TM). I've traveled at least MS 492 and MS 498. Also, I don't track my spotty travels on Virginia secondary routes, which TM will never map. Mapmikey has more extensively traveled the Virginia secondary system (Virginia is his home state, I only live there), and as he's noted above he can quickly zoom ahead of me once he gets to 599.

UPDATE: Running the program Jim is developing (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=24342.msg2694805#msg2694805), which picks up concurrences I missed in my manual searches of my TM list file, indicates that in the 400s and 500s, there are only four route numbers not accounted by TM-mapped routes I've been on, per my TM list file (oscar). Those would be ones where I drove only on Alabama or New Jersey county routes (437, 539, 554), or Mississippi state routes (498).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 03, 2022, 07:52:21 PM
Quote from: Jim on January 02, 2022, 08:19:45 PM
Hope Oscar doesn't mind my running TM's "RoutesByNumber" program on his data.  Using oscar.list in TM (which would be minus any concurrencies that might be auto-detected during the site update), the following is reported:

Numbers up to 999 for which no entries are found:
386 399 437 455 461 492 498 539 548 551 554 600 606 609 616 617 620 621 622 626 628 629 631 633 634 643 644 645 649 651 654 657 660 661 668 677 679 683 685 689 692 698 709 718 719 720 721 722 724 726 727 728 731 733 734 737 738 741 744 745 746 747 748 749 751 752 754 757 761 762 767 768 769 771 777 779 782 783 784 788 791 792 793 796 797 798 799 801 803 813 819 828 830 831 839 843 846 853 854 855 859 861 862 863 864 866 868 871 873 875 876 883 885 888 889 892 893 898 899 900 902 904 908 913 917 918 919 920 923 926 927 928 929 935 937 938 939 941 942 943 945 947 949 950 952 957 958 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 971 974 975 977 978 979 981 982 983 984 987 988 991 993 995 996 999


He has a comment in the file that he had clinched VA 386 and VA 399 while they existed.


Would it be possible to make this program publicly accessible somehow, e.g. by having a link to it on our TM user pages?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 03, 2022, 08:09:47 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on January 03, 2022, 07:52:21 PM
Would it be possible to make this program publicly accessible somehow, e.g. by having a link to it on our TM user pages?

I'd like to get the same functionality into the TM web front end, but haven't had a chance.  For now I'm happy to run for anyone on request, and anyone who wants to grab the Java code and run it can do so.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/DataProcessing/tree/master/RoutesByNumber

Just feed it the TM .list file you'd like it to process as standard input.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 03, 2022, 08:39:28 PM
Oh, cool. Thanks!

Of course, the real power in using TM for this is being able to leverage its concurrency data, so it'd be nice if the web front-end that eventually exists for the purposes of this could do that. I don't know if that would have an unacceptably high server overhead for what kind of amounts to a toy for a subset of the userbase, though.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 03, 2022, 08:48:47 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on January 03, 2022, 08:39:28 PM
Oh, cool. Thanks!

Of course, the real power in using TM for this is being able to leverage its concurrency data, so it'd be nice if the web front-end that eventually exists for the purposes of this could do that. I don't know if that would have an unacceptably high server overhead for what kind of amounts to a toy for a subset of the userbase, though.

TM is chock full of toys for subsets of the userbase!

Yes, if pulling out of the database, you'd get the benefit of detected concurrency info.  I think the server load for such functionality is negligible, the only limiting factor is getting it implemented.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 03, 2022, 11:49:29 PM
OK, so I couldn't help myself and needed to get this implemented.  It's just on TM's development server for now:

https://tmdevel.teresco.org/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=terescoj

Send along any suggestions and report any bugs, and once it is in good shape, I'll get it on the main site and link it from the user page.

Also, I can now update my number for this thread to 184.  Turns out I've been on 2 of what I thought was my lowest missing number, as I-78 leading to the Holland Tunnel is also NJ 139, and US 36 has a concurrency with MO 139.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: froggie on January 04, 2022, 01:01:43 AM
Three years after-the-fact (and using Jim's development code on TM) I'll finally bite on this thread.  Using TM, my lowest untraveled number is 323.  But I've traveled the former MN 323, so my lowest number now would be 379.

Taking a slightly different spin, the lowest route number where I have only traveled one such route is 248.  I've only been on PA 248...no other routes with that number.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on January 04, 2022, 01:47:05 AM
Quote from: froggie on January 04, 2022, 01:01:43 AM
Three years after-the-fact (and using Jim's development code on TM) I'll finally bite on this thread.  Using TM, my lowest untraveled number is 323.  But I've traveled the former MN 323, so my lowest number now would be 379.

Taking a slightly different spin, the lowest route number where I have only traveled one such route is 248.  I've only been on PA 248...no other routes with that number.

My lowest such route is 379 (only VA 379).

The lowest number where I have been on fewer than 10 routes is 106 (NS106, NB106, CT106, GA106, IL106, NH106, SD106, VA106). Fewer than 5 routes, 192 (US192, MD192, TXSpr192, CA192)

The list generated by Jim's code indicates I've traveled a lot of route 0s, but mine are all unnumbered routes in TM's database. Jim, is there a way to narrow the "route 0" list to routes that are actually numbered 0?  There seem to be some motorways in Europe numbered 0, none of which I've been on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 01:48:31 AM
Quote from: Jim on January 03, 2022, 11:49:29 PM
OK, so I couldn't help myself and needed to get this implemented.  It's just on TM's development server for now:

https://tmdevel.teresco.org/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=terescoj

Send along any suggestions and report any bugs, and once it is in good shape, I'll get it on the main site and link it from the user page.

Also, I can now update my number for this thread to 184.  Turns out I've been on 2 of what I thought was my lowest missing number, as I-78 leading to the Holland Tunnel is also NJ 139, and US 36 has a concurrency with MO 139.

This is very nice!  About two years ago I wrote a program to parse my *.log file and produce a similar list.  Worked fine, but a couple of drawbacks:
Interesting discovery using these programs - I do indeed have a 218.  About a mile of IN 218 is concurrent with US 31 in Indiana.  No way would I have realized this otherwise.

I'm wondering if this following idea could be easily implemented as well:  Given a number, find all the routes in the DB that have that number.  For example - my lowest number needed (as of now) is 167.  It would be nice to see which 167's are closest to me for planning.  (It's probably the one near Roanoke VA).

For those who say "Just look at the Wikipedia page for 'Route 167'" - those Wikipedia pages are sometimes incomplete.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 04, 2022, 07:01:33 AM
There's always searching for routes manually in Google Maps. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on January 04, 2022, 09:14:53 AM
Quote from: Jim on January 03, 2022, 11:49:29 PM
OK, so I couldn't help myself and needed to get this implemented.  It's just on TM's development server for now:

https://tmdevel.teresco.org/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=terescoj

Send along any suggestions and report any bugs, and once it is in good shape, I'll get it on the main site and link it from the user page.

Also, I can now update my number for this thread to 184.  Turns out I've been on 2 of what I thought was my lowest missing number, as I-78 leading to the Holland Tunnel is also NJ 139, and US 36 has a concurrency with MO 139.

Thanks for doing this Jim.  My number in this thread is 361, and your tool shows I don't have the following:

198 - I've been on MS198 which isn't in TM yet
233 - I clinched CO233 when it wasn't signed but was listed on the CDOT website
263 - I clinched CO263 when it was signed and listed on the CDOT website
282 - I've clinched NM282 but it's unsigned so therefore not on TM

Also, would it be a ton of extra coding if the highways listed for each number then linked to their page in the highway browser?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 04, 2022, 09:17:30 AM
Counting unsigned routes is another circle of sissy.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on January 04, 2022, 09:19:33 AM
Quote from: Rothman on January 04, 2022, 09:17:30 AM
Counting unsigned routes is another circle of sissy.

If it exists, it exists. I fight the same argument on the TM forum.




Also, my lowest route number to only have been travelled in one state/province/country is 48, and I've only really been on MN48 when visiting an ice cream shop (Toby's) in Hinckley, MN where we used to meet some family when I was going up to Duluth in the summer.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on January 04, 2022, 09:29:32 AM
Quote from: oscar on January 04, 2022, 01:47:05 AM
The list generated by Jim's code indicates I've traveled a lot of route 0s, but mine are all unnumbered routes in TM's database. Jim, is there a way to narrow the "route 0" list to routes that are actually numbered 0?  There seem to be some motorways in Europe numbered 0, none of which I've been on.

Woo!  I've gotten one number that Oscar doesn't have as I've been on R0 in Belgium.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on January 04, 2022, 10:01:27 AM
Zeros aren't counted, as per the initial post:

Quote from: 1 on January 23, 2019, 07:39:50 AM
Positive integers, obviously.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on January 04, 2022, 10:06:31 AM
Quote from: formulanone on January 04, 2022, 10:01:27 AM
Zeros aren't counted, as per the initial post:

Quote from: 1 on January 23, 2019, 07:39:50 AM
Positive integers, obviously.

Don't care.  When "fighting against" Oscar, you gotta pull out all the stops.  I prefer to read that as "non-negative".  :bigass:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on January 04, 2022, 11:32:17 AM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on January 04, 2022, 09:19:33 AM
Quote from: Rothman on January 04, 2022, 09:17:30 AM
Counting unsigned routes is another circle of sissy.

If it exists, it exists. I fight the same argument on the TM forum.

Finally, someone who agrees with me on this. If I'm clinching state highways, I'm clinching state highways, not just the ones the DOT thinks are important. I'm not going to ignore routes that definitely exist simply because the DOT is too lazy to post a couple signs, or they post signs that aren't in the TM approved format (for whatever reason street blades and enhanced mile markers don't count over there). Plus you get things like SR 519 in Washington where signs might disappear for a bit during construction and then come back after.

Most relevant in southeastern states where US highways have an unsigned state route underlay. Except Georgia where they are all signed anyway.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on January 04, 2022, 12:04:42 PM
Quote from: US 89 on January 04, 2022, 11:32:17 AM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on January 04, 2022, 09:19:33 AM
Quote from: Rothman on January 04, 2022, 09:17:30 AM
Counting unsigned routes is another circle of sissy.

If it exists, it exists. I fight the same argument on the TM forum.

Finally, someone who agrees with me on this. If I'm clinching state highways, I'm clinching state highways, not just the ones the DOT thinks are important. I'm not going to ignore routes that definitely exist simply because the DOT is too lazy to post a couple signs, or they post signs that aren't in the TM approved format (for whatever reason street blades and enhanced mile markers don't count over there). Plus you get things like SR 519 in Washington where signs might disappear for a bit during construction and then come back after.

Most relevant in southeastern states where US highways have an unsigned state route underlay. Except Georgia where they are all signed anyway.

I just know if I had set out to clinch all of Colorado's state highways, as I did, and I just skipped some that were on the books because of a technicality, I would always know I wasn't actually done.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 04, 2022, 02:51:56 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 01:48:31 AM
I'm wondering if this following idea could be easily implemented as well:  Given a number, find all the routes in the DB that have that number.  For example - my lowest number needed (as of now) is 167.  It would be nice to see which 167's are closest to me for planning.  (It's probably the one near Roanoke VA).

Probably something more likely for a program operating on the data outside of the TM web front end but a fun problem to think about.  I've got loads of ideas like this waiting for someone to take a shot at them.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: yakra on January 04, 2022, 04:15:52 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 01:48:31 AM
For example - my lowest number needed (as of now) is 167.  It would be nice to see which 167's are closest to me for planning.

Quote from: Jim on January 04, 2022, 02:51:56 PM
Probably something more likely for a program operating on the data outside of the TM web front end but a fun problem to think about.  I've got loads of ideas like this waiting for someone to take a shot at them.

The web front-end can track a user's location.
As far as comparing that against all the routes/waypoints to find a result, well...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 04, 2022, 05:35:10 PM
Quote from: yakra on January 04, 2022, 04:15:52 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 01:48:31 AM
For example - my lowest number needed (as of now) is 167.  It would be nice to see which 167's are closest to me for planning.

Quote from: Jim on January 04, 2022, 02:51:56 PM
Probably something more likely for a program operating on the data outside of the TM web front end but a fun problem to think about.  I've got loads of ideas like this waiting for someone to take a shot at them.

The web front-end can track a user's location.
As far as comparing that against all the routes/waypoints to find a result, well...

Run Dijkstra's algorithm starting at the TM waypoint closest to you, adding edges to the spanning tree until you've traversed an edge that has a 167 as part of the edge label.  Work your way back in the tree and you have a shortest all-TM route to get there.  Not saying it would be necessarily super fast, but Dijkstra's is pretty efficient.

Yes, this needs to be in HDX. (https://github.com/TravelMapping/EduTools/issues/397)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 06:04:05 PM
Quote from: Jim on January 04, 2022, 02:51:56 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 01:48:31 AM
I'm wondering if this following idea could be easily implemented as well:  Given a number, find all the routes in the DB that have that number.  For example - my lowest number needed (as of now) is 167.  It would be nice to see which 167's are closest to me for planning.  (It's probably the one near Roanoke VA).

Probably something more likely for a program operating on the data outside of the TM web front end but a fun problem to think about.  I've got loads of ideas like this waiting for someone to take a shot at them.

Just to be clear - I was only asking for a list of all the routes numbered <whatever> - not necessarily sorted in distance order from me.  I can manually inspect the list to find the closest.

My one "solution" (LOL) - since anybody's input file can be seen, I just downloaded oscar's input file and did a grep for 167 (or whatever number).  I figure he's been on virtually every road in the continent by now.   :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 04, 2022, 06:13:25 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 06:04:05 PM
Quote from: Jim on January 04, 2022, 02:51:56 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 01:48:31 AM
I'm wondering if this following idea could be easily implemented as well:  Given a number, find all the routes in the DB that have that number.  For example - my lowest number needed (as of now) is 167.  It would be nice to see which 167's are closest to me for planning.  (It's probably the one near Roanoke VA).

Probably something more likely for a program operating on the data outside of the TM web front end but a fun problem to think about.  I've got loads of ideas like this waiting for someone to take a shot at them.

Just to be clear - I was only asking for a list of all the routes numbered <whatever> - not necessarily sorted in distance order from me.  I can manually inspect the list to find the closest.

Yes, but the thing is, once you mention an interesting problem to a programmer, their mind starts spinning on how to solve it by programming, even if the solution can be found manually with less effort. :P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 06:22:57 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on January 04, 2022, 06:13:25 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 06:04:05 PM
Quote from: Jim on January 04, 2022, 02:51:56 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 01:48:31 AM
I'm wondering if this following idea could be easily implemented as well:  Given a number, find all the routes in the DB that have that number.  For example - my lowest number needed (as of now) is 167.  It would be nice to see which 167's are closest to me for planning.  (It's probably the one near Roanoke VA).

Probably something more likely for a program operating on the data outside of the TM web front end but a fun problem to think about.  I've got loads of ideas like this waiting for someone to take a shot at them.

Just to be clear - I was only asking for a list of all the routes numbered <whatever> - not necessarily sorted in distance order from me.  I can manually inspect the list to find the closest.

Yes, but the thing is, once you mention an interesting problem to a programmer, their mind starts spinning on how to solve it by programming, even if the solution can be found manually with less effort. :P

Preaching to the choir :)  Programming for the last 40+ years myself, I know what you mean!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on January 04, 2022, 07:49:10 PM
I've been on US 54 in downtown Stratford 2 years ago. Now it seems to be 67.

I-55 from STL to north of Jackson, MS
CO 56 (clinched)
CA 57 (Southern terminus to Yorba Linda)
CO 58 (clinched)
I-59 (Meridian-Birmingham)
US 60 in downtown Phoenix
US 61 (Avenue of the Saints)
US 62 (I-55)
US 63 (Macon, MO)
I-64 (STL)
MN 65 (US 169 - Mora)
CO 66 (clinched)
No 67
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: corco on January 04, 2022, 08:51:41 PM
I clinched PA 329 this weekend, moving me up to...333  :-|
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on January 04, 2022, 09:00:54 PM
Quote from: corco on January 04, 2022, 08:51:41 PM
I clinched PA 329 this weekend, moving me up to...333  :-|

Pennsyltucky beckons! PA 333 is an alternate to US 22 along the Juniata River that I've been meaning to drive more of.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on January 04, 2022, 09:20:01 PM
Looks like mapcat from TM would be at 525.

My lowest one-and-only route would be 186 (in Connecticut).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on January 04, 2022, 10:20:34 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 04, 2022, 09:20:01 PM
Looks like mapcat from TM would be at 525.

Moreover, once he snags 525, his lowest untraveled route number would be 673.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: yakra on January 04, 2022, 11:50:51 PM
Quote from: Jim on January 04, 2022, 05:35:10 PM
Run Dijkstra's algorithm starting at the TM waypoint closest to you, adding edges to the spanning tree until you've traversed an edge that has a 167 as part of the edge label.  Work your way back in the tree and you have a shortest all-TM route to get there.  Not saying it would be necessarily super fast, but Dijkstra's is pretty efficient.

Yes, this needs to be in HDX. (https://github.com/TravelMapping/EduTools/issues/397)
I'm thinking, an as-the-crow-flies approach, to capture routes disconnected from the rest of the road network. Like if I live in Saint Ignace and am missing a 185.

Quote from: dlsterner on January 04, 2022, 06:04:05 PM
Just to be clear - I was only asking for a list of all the routes numbered <whatever> - not necessarily sorted in distance order from me.  I can manually inspect the list to find the closest.

My one "solution" (LOL) - since anybody's input file can be seen, I just downloaded oscar's input file and did a grep for 167 (or whatever number).  I figure he's been on virtually every road in the continent by now.   :-D
Here's what I did to find the nearest route 48:
cd tm/HighwayData/hwy_data/_systems/ (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/tree/master/hwy_data/_systems)
systems=`ls usa* | grep -v _` #only worry about US systems; only look at "chopped routes" CSV files
cat $systems | egrep '.*;.*;[A-Z]+48;.*;.*;.*;.*;.*'

...and then manually inspected the results. Looks like a toss-up between NY, NJ & DE.

Quote from: Scott5114 on January 04, 2022, 06:13:25 PM
Yes, but the thing is, once you mention an interesting problem to a programmer, their mind starts spinning on how to solve it by programming, even if the solution can be found manually with less effort. :P
:spin:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on January 05, 2022, 12:23:19 PM
Quote from: oscar on January 04, 2022, 10:20:34 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 04, 2022, 09:20:01 PM
Looks like mapcat from TM would be at 525.

Moreover, once he snags 525, his lowest untraveled route number would be 673.
Ironically, there is no 525 in Ohio (or Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and West Virginia), so Dave will have to go digging in Kentucky for it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoolAngrybirdsrio4 on January 05, 2022, 03:37:22 PM
I would have to say route 2 anywhere for any signed routes, since I have been on Michigan Highway 1 and 3.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on January 05, 2022, 04:19:46 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on January 05, 2022, 12:23:19 PM
Quote from: oscar on January 04, 2022, 10:20:34 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 04, 2022, 09:20:01 PM
Looks like mapcat from TM would be at 525.

Moreover, once he snags 525, his lowest untraveled route number would be 673.
Ironically, there is no 525 in Ohio (or Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and West Virginia), so Dave will have to go digging in Kentucky for it.

Yeah, he's spotted it, but it's not in a convenient part of the state. There's also one in Louisiana (my go-to for high-numbered routes), but apparently not in Pennsylvania, Mississippi, or Florida (also home to many high-numbered routes). I traveled one about a decade and a half ago in western Washington state, and there's a secondary route 525 in a remote area of western Ontario.

Wikipedia's list of routes numbered 525 looks seriously incomplete.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: yakra on January 05, 2022, 04:36:02 PM
https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?units=miles&u=mapcat&r=nb.nb525
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on January 05, 2022, 05:21:09 PM
Quote from: oscar on January 05, 2022, 04:19:46 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on January 05, 2022, 12:23:19 PM
Quote from: oscar on January 04, 2022, 10:20:34 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 04, 2022, 09:20:01 PM
Looks like mapcat from TM would be at 525.

Moreover, once he snags 525, his lowest untraveled route number would be 673.
Ironically, there is no 525 in Ohio (or Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and West Virginia), so Dave will have to go digging in Kentucky for it.

Yeah, he's spotted it, but it's not in a convenient part of the state. There's also one in Louisiana (my go-to for high-numbered routes), but apparently not in Pennsylvania, Mississippi, or Florida (also home to many high-numbered routes). I traveled one about a decade and a half ago in western Washington state, and there's a secondary route 525 in a remote area of western Ontario.

Wikipedia's list of routes numbered 525 looks seriously incomplete.

525 ain't a number there are many of, as several of the states that go high don't have that number. My 525 is the A525 over in the UK. The A525 is actually how I "froggied" Wales from the A41.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 05, 2022, 07:58:15 PM
Catching up with you fools.  Let me know if I missed anything in this mess of a thread. :D










































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
cl94330
corco329
Konza316
Duke87265
froggie248
Hot Rod Hootenanny246
deathtopumpkins239
74/171FAN217
paulthemapguy207
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Jim139
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
jlam67
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Jim on January 05, 2022, 08:36:58 PM
^ mine's now 184
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 05, 2022, 08:38:18 PM
Mmkay.










































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
cl94330
corco329
Konza316
Duke87265
froggie248
Hot Rod Hootenanny246
deathtopumpkins239
74/171FAN217
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
jlam67
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 06, 2022, 04:12:55 AM
Quote from: oscar on January 05, 2022, 04:19:46 PM
Wikipedia's list of routes numbered 525 looks seriously incomplete.

I dunno, it looks pretty complete to me, at least as far as Canada and the United States is concerned. :P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: corco on January 06, 2022, 09:07:48 AM
I'm up to 333 as well
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on January 06, 2022, 09:59:45 AM
Quote from: oscar on January 05, 2022, 04:19:46 PM
Wikipedia's list of routes numbered 525 looks seriously incomplete.

Indeed. It is missing Spain's N-525, which I may have been on (though not sure); and France's former N525, which got its end cut out by the construction of Roselend Lake (It never reached the Cormet de Roselend despite what the current numbering may suggest otherwise).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 06, 2022, 03:09:01 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on January 06, 2022, 09:59:45 AM
Quote from: oscar on January 05, 2022, 04:19:46 PM
Wikipedia's list of routes numbered 525 looks seriously incomplete.

Indeed. It is missing Spain's N-525, which I may have been on (though not sure); and France's former N525, which got its end cut out by the construction of Roselend Lake (It never reached the Cormet de Roselend despite what the current numbering may suggest otherwise).

I go to all the trouble to do this
Quote from: yakra on January 04, 2022, 11:50:51 PM
cd tm/HighwayData/hwy_data/_systems/ (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/tree/master/hwy_data/_systems)
systems=`ls usa* | grep -v _` #only worry about US systems; only look at "chopped routes" CSV files
cat $systems | egrep '.*;.*;[A-Z]+48;.*;.*;.*;.*;.*'


to get at least the US and Canada entries added, and this is the thanks I get?  :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 06, 2022, 05:23:05 PM
Mmmmkay.











































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
Duke87265
froggie248
Hot Rod Hootenanny246
deathtopumpkins239
74/171FAN217
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
Caps8194382
jlam67
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: csw on January 10, 2022, 05:54:42 PM
Quote from: csw on January 02, 2022, 04:48:29 PM
Add me to the list of anti-county route participants. I went 40 minutes out of my way to drive on OH 182, only to find it has demoted to a county route. One of the few times my DeLorme has led me astray.

...and to add further to my dismay, while sorting through photos, I realized that the other route I went out of my way to travel (OH 199) was unneeded because I hit NY 199 in October. So my Ohio detour was a complete waste of time.

Why, oh why, does this game have to be so fun...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Caps81943 on January 11, 2022, 07:16:59 PM
U8pdate! I recently traveled stretches of CT-82 and MD-85, making my new lowest number 86!

86, 88, and 92 are all I need before 100
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Duke87 on January 16, 2022, 01:58:27 AM
Since this is still being updated I'll go ahead and note that my lowest missing number is now 336 (and has been for a few months).


Also, for anyone who has a TravelMapping account, there is now a nice page on the site which will show you every number you are missing: https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=duke87

With the caveat that this only includes routes which are on TM, so it does not include anything unsigned, does not include county routes, does not include routes which have been decommissioned or renumbered since you last drove on them, etc.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on January 16, 2022, 11:17:19 AM
I'm late to the game here, but the lowest number that I've never been on is 14.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 16, 2022, 05:29:48 PM
:| Updated. :|












































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
froggie248
Hot Rod Hootenanny246
deathtopumpkins239
74/171FAN217
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
BlueOutback714
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: clong on January 16, 2022, 09:22:06 PM
89 for me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on January 17, 2022, 10:09:06 PM
Quote from: Duke87 on January 16, 2022, 01:58:27 AM
Since this is still being updated I'll go ahead and note that my lowest missing number is now 336 (and has been for a few months).


Also, for anyone who has a TravelMapping account, there is now a nice page on the site which will show you every number you are missing: https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=duke87

With the caveat that this only includes routes which are on TM, so it does not include anything unsigned, does not include county routes, does not include routes which have been decommissioned or renumbered since you last drove on them, etc.

And the state of Mississippi.  :eyebrow:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 23, 2022, 05:49:03 PM
As Captain Kirk said, "CLONG!"











































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
froggie248
Hot Rod Hootenanny246
deathtopumpkins239
74/171FAN217
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
BlueOutback714
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SEWIGuy on January 24, 2022, 05:01:44 PM
OK, I finally went through this and I am pretty sure it is 108.  I have not been on WI-108, there is no I-108 or US-108, and I am reasonably sure I have not been on another state's 108.

It was interesting being from Wisconsin with no single state highways, but I am sure I have been on interstates, USHs and other state highways that have covered all single digits.  And the few 2dwis I haven't been on have all been covered by either interstates or US Highways.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on January 24, 2022, 10:01:08 PM
I would personally be against trying to collect as many DWIs as possible.  :-P :pan:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on January 24, 2022, 10:37:15 PM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on January 24, 2022, 10:01:08 PM
I would personally be against trying to collect as many DWIs as possible.  :-P :pan:

I miss that "Threads You'll Never See on AARoads" thread.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 24, 2022, 11:38:53 PM
Hm.  I used to be a NWWIGuy...











































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
froggie248
Hot Rod Hootenanny246
deathtopumpkins239
74/171FAN217
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
BlueOutback714
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on January 31, 2022, 02:59:24 PM
I clinched PA 217 Saturday Night (or early Sunday Morning) so I am now at 247.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: deathtopumpkins on February 09, 2022, 11:47:27 AM
Snagged VA 239 on Monday, which moves me up to..... 245. Woo.

Annoyingly it looks like I drove right by MD 245 on Sunday.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 09, 2022, 03:13:38 PM
It's always sadly amusing when someone's number changes and yet they don't move up the ranks...












































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
froggie248
74/171FAN247
Hot Rod Hootenanny246
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
BlueOutback714
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on February 09, 2022, 03:51:48 PM
Quote from: Rothman on February 09, 2022, 03:13:38 PM
It's always sadly amusing when someone's number changes and yet they don't move up the ranks...

But we do have 245, 246, 247, and 248 consecutively within the ranks for now.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on February 09, 2022, 05:13:11 PM
Quote from: deathtopumpkins on February 09, 2022, 11:47:27 AM
Snagged VA 239 on Monday, which moves me up to..... 245. Woo.

Annoyingly it looks like I drove right by MD 245 on Sunday.

Just more of a reason for you to clinch some more roads in New York! NY 245 is a nice, varied drive in the Finger Lakes.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Max Rockatansky on February 09, 2022, 05:29:26 PM
Quote from: cl94 on February 09, 2022, 05:13:11 PM
Quote from: deathtopumpkins on February 09, 2022, 11:47:27 AM
Snagged VA 239 on Monday, which moves me up to..... 245. Woo.

Annoyingly it looks like I drove right by MD 245 on Sunday.

Just more of a reason for you to clinch some more roads in New York! NY 245 is a nice, varied drive in the Finger Lakes.

To add to that, if anyone wants a quality 245 check out the one in California.  In a good handling car it's a blast to drive and is a competitor for curviest California State Route. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 09, 2022, 11:02:02 PM
While nursing a flat tire in Florence, Alabama, I did travel Tn 248, so my lowest number is now 268.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on February 10, 2022, 06:43:31 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 09, 2022, 11:02:02 PM
While nursing a flat tire in Florence, Alabama, I did travel Tn 248, so my lowest number is now 268.

Well I guess you will be getting off I-80 near Emlenton, PA, (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?units=miles&u=markkos1992&r=pa.pa268) the next time you follow that corridor. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 22, 2022, 11:16:15 AM
Hm.  Had Hot Rod at 246 instead of 248, but whatever.  He's now at 268.












































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
74/171FAN247
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
Scott511497
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
BlueOutback714
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 23, 2022, 08:44:30 PM
Quote from: Rothman on February 22, 2022, 11:16:15 AM
Hm.  Had Hot Rod at 246 instead of 248, but whatever.  He's now at 268.

I had picked off 246 in Toledo at the end of January. Didn't feel it was worth mentioning at the time.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 23, 2022, 09:04:59 PM
"Suit yourself, I'm easy." -- Igor
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on March 01, 2022, 12:53:43 PM
I've officially been on RI 14, so my new lowest number is now 19.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on March 04, 2022, 02:33:56 AM
My wife dragged me up to Tulsa today, so I clinched OK-97 while I was up there. I have OK-98 and 99 clinched (actually clinched 98 because of this thread, in preparation of this moment), and I've been on WI-100. My lowest is now 101.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:30:45 AM
I'm guessing anyone that uses Travel Mapping probably knows this, but there's a handy page where you can view the list of all route numbers you have/haven't been on. Here's mine: https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=webny99&

... but I only just started using TM, so mine isn't fully up to date. I know I've been on US 2, NJ 4, and EDIT: ON 24, US 25E, ON 27, ND 32, I-37, and I-40, but not 100% sure about anything higher than that, so I'll go with 43 as my first-time answer to this thread for now.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:31:35 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on March 04, 2022, 02:33:56 AM
My lowest is now 101.

Next stop: Golden Gate Bridge?  :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 07, 2022, 12:45:57 PM
Some minor shifts and a newbie...














































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
74/171FAN247
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
SkyPesos58
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
webny9943
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
BlueOutback719
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on March 07, 2022, 02:09:31 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:31:35 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on March 04, 2022, 02:33:56 AM
My lowest is now 101.

Next stop: Golden Gate Bridge?  :D

I would argue that VA 101 next to the Roanoke Airport is easier to get if you somehow ever end up flying there.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on March 07, 2022, 02:12:13 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:30:45 AM
I'm guessing anyone that uses Travel Mapping probably knows this, but there's a handy page where you can view the list of all route numbers you have/haven't been on.

That page is there because of this thread.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SEWIGuy on March 07, 2022, 02:47:40 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on March 07, 2022, 02:09:31 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:31:35 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on March 04, 2022, 02:33:56 AM
My lowest is now 101.

Next stop: Golden Gate Bridge?  :D

I would argue that VA 101 next to the Roanoke Airport is easier to get if you somehow ever end up flying there.

He wouldn't even have to go to the Golden Gate.  US-101 runs right past SFO airport.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on March 07, 2022, 02:59:15 PM
Quote from: SEWIGuy on March 07, 2022, 02:47:40 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on March 07, 2022, 02:09:31 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:31:35 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on March 04, 2022, 02:33:56 AM
My lowest is now 101.

Next stop: Golden Gate Bridge?  :D

I would argue that VA 101 next to the Roanoke Airport is easier to get if you somehow ever end up flying there.

He wouldn't even have to go to the Golden Gate.  US-101 runs right past SFO airport.

You folks are making things harder for Scott5114 than they need to be.
I'm sure he's aware that there is an Oklahoma state road 101, presumably much closer to him than the Golden Gate Bridge :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_State_Highway_101 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_State_Highway_101)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 03:10:25 PM
Quote from: US 89 on March 07, 2022, 02:12:13 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:30:45 AM
I'm guessing anyone that uses Travel Mapping probably knows this, but there's a handy page where you can view the list of all route numbers you have/haven't been on.

That page is there because of this thread.

Needless to say, I'm doing it backwards.  :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on March 08, 2022, 10:55:57 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on March 07, 2022, 02:59:15 PM
Quote from: SEWIGuy on March 07, 2022, 02:47:40 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on March 07, 2022, 02:09:31 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:31:35 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on March 04, 2022, 02:33:56 AM
My lowest is now 101.

Next stop: Golden Gate Bridge?  :D

I would argue that VA 101 next to the Roanoke Airport is easier to get if you somehow ever end up flying there.

He wouldn't even have to go to the Golden Gate.  US-101 runs right past SFO airport.

You folks are making things harder for Scott5114 than they need to be.
I'm sure he's aware that there is an Oklahoma state road 101, presumably much closer to him than the Golden Gate Bridge :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_State_Highway_101 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_State_Highway_101)

Haha, yeah, Sallisaw is on my shortlist of places to go (which is probably the first time anyone has ever said that). I have a routing in mind that will snag me OK-104 too.

Unfortunately, I'm already starting to get into territory where the OK route numbering system starts thinning out. I'm preparing for that by going on out-of-state routes that don't exist in Oklahoma whenever it's convenient, though. In October, I picked up K-106, and on the way to the Natchez meet I'm going to be sure to touch LA-107.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on March 09, 2022, 11:07:03 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:30:45 AM
I'm guessing anyone that uses Travel Mapping probably knows this, but there's a handy page where you can view the list of all route numbers you have/haven't been on. Here's mine: https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=webny99&

... but I only just started using TM, so mine isn't fully up to date. I know I've been on US 2, NJ 4, and EDIT: ON 24, US 25E, ON 27, ND 32, I-37, and I-40, but not 100% sure about anything higher than that, so I'll go with 43 as my first-time answer to this thread for now.

TIL that MN 43 has a multiplex with I-90 which I've been on. So I'm actually at 47.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on March 17, 2022, 08:41:17 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 09, 2022, 11:07:03 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:30:45 AM
I'm guessing anyone that uses Travel Mapping probably knows this, but there's a handy page where you can view the list of all route numbers you have/haven't been on. Here's mine: https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=webny99&

... but I only just started using TM, so mine isn't fully up to date. I know I've been on US 2, NJ 4, and EDIT: ON 24, US 25E, ON 27, ND 32, I-37, and I-40, but not 100% sure about anything higher than that, so I'll go with 43 as my first-time answer to this thread for now.

TIL that MN 43 has a multiplex with I-90 which I've been on. So I'm actually at 47.

Still at 47 after finishing my initial data entry and edits. 47 and 68 are my only numbers under 100 not traveled on. TM also shows 57 and 97, but I have been on Onondaga CR 57 and RR 97 near Cambridge, ON.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SD Mapman on March 17, 2022, 01:32:03 PM
Just checked mine, and my first two are 107 and 117. Not sure how I'm going to get those, given WY, SD, and NE don't have an option for that, but I bet I can figure something out.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 17, 2022, 10:50:49 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 17, 2022, 08:41:17 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 09, 2022, 11:07:03 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 07, 2022, 11:30:45 AM
I'm guessing anyone that uses Travel Mapping probably knows this, but there's a handy page where you can view the list of all route numbers you have/haven't been on. Here's mine: https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=webny99&

... but I only just started using TM, so mine isn't fully up to date. I know I've been on US 2, NJ 4, and EDIT: ON 24, US 25E, ON 27, ND 32, I-37, and I-40, but not 100% sure about anything higher than that, so I'll go with 43 as my first-time answer to this thread for now.

TIL that MN 43 has a multiplex with I-90 which I've been on. So I'm actually at 47.

Still at 47 after finishing my initial data entry and edits. 47 and 68 are my only numbers under 100 not traveled on. TM also shows 57 and 97, but I have been on Onondaga CR 57 and RR 97 near Cambridge, ON.
County routes are for sissies.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on March 21, 2022, 12:04:15 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 20, 2021, 06:43:59 PM
While tracking my travels, I realized that I have been on my lowest number (47) 8 years ago, on an overlap of MO 47 with MO 21. So now to find my next lowest...

OH 48, MO 49, US 50, US 51, US 52, IL 53, US 54, I-55, OH 56, I-57

New lowest is 58 for me.

After that, my second lowest, as a note to myself...

US 59, PA 60, US 61, US 62, OH 63, I-64, I-65, I-66, US 67, I-68, I-69, I-70, I-71, I-72, OH 73, I-74, I-75, I-76, I-77, I-78, I-79, I-80, I-81, CA 82, I-83, I-84, I-85

...is 86.
Got a short part of IN 58 connecting between I-69 and IN 57 at Elnora yesterday. So, 86 is my next lowest number. Hoping to get eastern I-86 this summer on a potential trip to the northeast. After that, my second lowest number is 89, now that I also got AR 88 on my spring break trip too.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 21, 2022, 09:18:22 AM
On the road right now. I'll update this when I have the chance.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on March 21, 2022, 03:21:48 PM
Quote from: Rothman on March 17, 2022, 10:50:49 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 17, 2022, 08:41:17 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 09, 2022, 11:07:03 PM
TIL that MN 43 has a multiplex with I-90 which I've been on. So I'm actually at 47.

Still at 47 after finishing my initial data entry and edits. 47 and 68 are my only numbers under 100 not traveled on. TM also shows 57 and 97, but I have been on Onondaga CR 57 and RR 97 near Cambridge, ON.
County routes are for sissies.

Doesn't matter yet - as my lowest is still lower than 57. But that particular county route was formerly a state route and it's well known enough (including being signed on the Thruway) that I'm counting it.  :-P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 21, 2022, 09:23:03 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 21, 2022, 03:21:48 PM
Quote from: Rothman on March 17, 2022, 10:50:49 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 17, 2022, 08:41:17 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 09, 2022, 11:07:03 PM
TIL that MN 43 has a multiplex with I-90 which I've been on. So I'm actually at 47.

Still at 47 after finishing my initial data entry and edits. 47 and 68 are my only numbers under 100 not traveled on. TM also shows 57 and 97, but I have been on Onondaga CR 57 and RR 97 near Cambridge, ON.
County routes are for sissies.

Doesn't matter yet - as my lowest is still lower than 57. But that particular county route was formerly a state route and it's well known enough (including being signed on the Thruway) that I'm counting it.  :-P
Anyone can count anything they want...but they cannot escape the consequences.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on March 21, 2022, 09:48:46 PM
Quote from: Rothman on March 21, 2022, 09:23:03 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 21, 2022, 03:21:48 PM
Quote from: Rothman on March 17, 2022, 10:50:49 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 17, 2022, 08:41:17 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 09, 2022, 11:07:03 PM
TIL that MN 43 has a multiplex with I-90 which I've been on. So I'm actually at 47.

Still at 47 after finishing my initial data entry and edits. 47 and 68 are my only numbers under 100 not traveled on. TM also shows 57 and 97, but I have been on Onondaga CR 57 and RR 97 near Cambridge, ON.
County routes are for sissies.

Doesn't matter yet - as my lowest is still lower than 57. But that particular county route was formerly a state route and it's well known enough (including being signed on the Thruway) that I'm counting it.  :-P
Anyone can count anything they want...but they cannot escape the consequences.

What consequences? Haven't most of the users at or near the top of the leaderboard gotten there by counting county routes?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 21, 2022, 10:10:24 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 21, 2022, 09:48:46 PM
Quote from: Rothman on March 21, 2022, 09:23:03 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 21, 2022, 03:21:48 PM
Quote from: Rothman on March 17, 2022, 10:50:49 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 17, 2022, 08:41:17 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 09, 2022, 11:07:03 PM
TIL that MN 43 has a multiplex with I-90 which I've been on. So I'm actually at 47.

Still at 47 after finishing my initial data entry and edits. 47 and 68 are my only numbers under 100 not traveled on. TM also shows 57 and 97, but I have been on Onondaga CR 57 and RR 97 near Cambridge, ON.
County routes are for sissies.

Doesn't matter yet - as my lowest is still lower than 57. But that particular county route was formerly a state route and it's well known enough (including being signed on the Thruway) that I'm counting it.  :-P
Anyone can count anything they want...but they cannot escape the consequences.

What consequences? Haven't most of the users at or near the top of the leaderboard gotten there by counting county routes?
Mainly mockery.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on March 22, 2022, 11:56:52 AM
Quote from: Rothman on March 21, 2022, 10:10:24 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 21, 2022, 09:48:46 PM
Quote from: Rothman on March 21, 2022, 09:23:03 PM
Anyone can count anything they want...but they cannot escape the consequences.

What consequences? Haven't most of the users at or near the top of the leaderboard gotten there by counting county routes?
Mainly mockery.

That I can handle, or I wouldn't be sticking around.  :-P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on March 22, 2022, 05:37:05 PM
Quote from: SD Mapman on March 17, 2022, 01:32:03 PM
Just checked mine, and my first two are 107 and 117. Not sure how I'm going to get those, given WY, SD, and NE don't have an option for that, but I bet I can figure something out.

107 is a tricky number in this part of the country, apparently, as neither Oklahoma nor Kansas have a 107 either. I ended up having to get mine in Louisiana.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on March 22, 2022, 05:42:23 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on March 22, 2022, 05:37:05 PM
Quote from: SD Mapman on March 17, 2022, 01:32:03 PM
Just checked mine, and my first two are 107 and 117. Not sure how I'm going to get those, given WY, SD, and NE don't have an option for that, but I bet I can figure something out.

107 is a tricky number in this part of the country, apparently, as neither Oklahoma nor Kansas have a 107 either. I ended up having to get mine in Louisiana.

Mine are randomly NH and NS.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on March 22, 2022, 07:35:25 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on March 22, 2022, 05:42:23 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on March 22, 2022, 05:37:05 PM
Quote from: SD Mapman on March 17, 2022, 01:32:03 PM
Just checked mine, and my first two are 107 and 117. Not sure how I'm going to get those, given WY, SD, and NE don't have an option for that, but I bet I can figure something out.

107 is a tricky number in this part of the country, apparently, as neither Oklahoma nor Kansas have a 107 either. I ended up having to get mine in Louisiana.

Mine are randomly NH and NS.

MN 107 is a minor regional connector that has little value if you're not specifically going to Braham. Braham is famous for pie, so maybe that's a reason to go.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on March 22, 2022, 08:58:21 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on March 22, 2022, 07:35:25 PM
MN 107 is a minor regional connector that has little value if you're not specifically going to Braham. Braham is famous for pie, so maybe that's a reason to go.
For highway 107s near me (or not-so near me), OH 107 is a short road in the northwest part of the state, IN 107 doesn't exist and IL 107 is in the far western part of the state. I think the best chance for a 107 for me is NY's which is on Long Island (which I visit around every year or so). Its interchanges with I-495 and NSP are both cloverleafs, so theoretically could just go through the loops to get a very short part of it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on March 22, 2022, 09:01:55 PM
There's also a MA 107 that goes from Revere to Salem.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 22, 2022, 09:06:13 PM
Think I did that right...














































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
74/171FAN247
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
SkyPesos86
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
BlueOutback719
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on March 31, 2022, 09:11:52 PM
I clinched MD 247 Sunday so I am now at the infamous 266.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on March 31, 2022, 10:30:52 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on March 31, 2022, 09:11:52 PM
I clinched MD 247 Sunday so I am now at the infamous 266.

What's infamous about 266? NY has a 266 which would be pretty easy to get on a trip to the Buffalo/Niagara Falls area.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on April 01, 2022, 06:14:14 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 31, 2022, 10:30:52 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on March 31, 2022, 09:11:52 PM
I clinched MD 247 Sunday so I am now at the infamous 266.

What's infamous about 266? NY has a 266 which would be pretty easy to get on a trip to the Buffalo/Niagara Falls area.

It is the first number that I cannot clinch in my usual clinching states of VA, MD, DE, PA, NC, NJ, and WV. (though NY probably does fit this list).

Yes, I know about OH 266 and NY 266.  What annoys me more is that I could have gotten some of MO 266 last September had I realized it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on April 01, 2022, 08:05:41 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 31, 2022, 10:30:52 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on March 31, 2022, 09:11:52 PM
I clinched MD 247 Sunday so I am now at the infamous 266.

What's infamous about 266? NY has a 266 which would be pretty easy to get on a trip to the Buffalo/Niagara Falls area.
Mixed it up with 366, which is the infamous one here?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 09:19:08 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on April 01, 2022, 08:05:41 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 31, 2022, 10:30:52 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on March 31, 2022, 09:11:52 PM
I clinched MD 247 Sunday so I am now at the infamous 266.

What's infamous about 266? NY has a 266 which would be pretty easy to get on a trip to the Buffalo/Niagara Falls area.
Mixed it up with 366, which is the infamous one here?

Different realms! I-366 is a fantasy route, but there's a few real 366s (Pennsylvania had the one I needed.)

266 was a point where a lot of us got stuck in this thread. 300s are where route systems start to have lots of gaps, even more so as you go on.

After the first 10, then 102 becomes a threshold, et al.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on April 01, 2022, 09:23:53 AM
Illinois starts to run out of highway numbers for the most part at 180, so that's why I haven't gotten much higher than 180. Don't expect my score to climb much higher than my current 207, heheh.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on April 01, 2022, 09:28:12 AM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 09:19:08 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on April 01, 2022, 08:05:41 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 31, 2022, 10:30:52 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on March 31, 2022, 09:11:52 PM
I clinched MD 247 Sunday so I am now at the infamous 266.

What's infamous about 266? NY has a 266 which would be pretty easy to get on a trip to the Buffalo/Niagara Falls area.
Mixed it up with 366, which is the infamous one here?

Different realms! I-366 is a fantasy route, but there's a few real 366s (Pennsylvania had the one I needed.)

266 was a point where a lot of us got stuck in this thread. 300s are where route systems start to have lots of gaps, even more so as you go on.

After the first 10, then 102 becomes a threshold, et al.

NY has a 366 as well, which runs from Ithaca to Freeville.

The 102 thing kind of surprises me considering how much of a destination Acadia NP is.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on April 01, 2022, 09:35:28 AM
Quote from: webny99 on April 01, 2022, 09:28:12 AM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 09:19:08 AM
Different realms! I-366 is a fantasy route, but there's a few real 366s (Pennsylvania had the one I needed.)

266 was a point where a lot of us got stuck in this thread. 300s are where route systems start to have lots of gaps, even more so as you go on.

After the first 10, then 102 becomes a threshold, et al.

NY has a 366 as well, which runs from Ithaca to Freeville.

The 102 thing kind of surprises me considering how much of a destination Acadia NP is.

Illinois has an easy, short, scenic 102 to clinch south of Chicago, that makes a good connector between Interstates 55 and 57.  I would take it often trying to get from the western suburbs down to Champaign during my college days.

I second the motion, however, to make Maine's 102 the 102 of choice, as a visit to Acadia NP will almost guarantee the inclusion for some mileage along Maine 102.

The St. Louis area has an easily-accessible 366: the Missouri State Route 366.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on April 01, 2022, 09:37:26 AM
Quote from: webny99 on April 01, 2022, 09:28:12 AM
The 102 thing kind of surprises me considering how much of a destination Acadia NP is.

It seems to be more of a number of digits issue. Every New England state except Maine has a whole bunch in the low 100s (well, Maine does, too, but not a lack of high two-digit routes), but outside New England, two-digit routes are more common.

For the record, I have NH 102, NH 107 (also part of the three-digit problem), and NY 366.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on April 01, 2022, 09:43:54 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on April 01, 2022, 09:35:28 AM
Quote from: webny99 on April 01, 2022, 09:28:12 AM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 09:19:08 AM
Different realms! I-366 is a fantasy route, but there's a few real 366s (Pennsylvania had the one I needed.)

266 was a point where a lot of us got stuck in this thread. 300s are where route systems start to have lots of gaps, even more so as you go on.

After the first 10, then 102 becomes a threshold, et al.

NY has a 366 as well, which runs from Ithaca to Freeville.

The 102 thing kind of surprises me considering how much of a destination Acadia NP is.

Illinois has an easy, short, scenic 102 to clinch south of Chicago, that makes a good connector between Interstates 55 and 57.  I would take it often trying to get from the western suburbs down to Champaign during my college days.

I second the motion, however, to make Maine's 102 the 102 of choice, as a visit to Acadia NP will almost guarantee the inclusion for some mileage along Maine 102.

The St. Louis area has an easily-accessible 366: the Missouri State Route 366.

Illinois' 102 is the one I got. I've been stuck on 108 for a while. I have a 3-day comprehensive Illinois trip planned in which I would:

Pick up the next two numbers I'm missing (108, 147) I'd then be up to 171.
Visit the rest of the Illinois counties I'm missing (28 of them)
Pick up the rest of interstate mileage I'm missing (72 W of 55, all of 172, all of 255, 57 S of 64, all of 24)
Pick up the rest of IL 1 (S of US 45)

Hope to get this done this summer.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 01, 2022, 10:16:43 AM
Headed out on vacation (no, not to touch 451...I've got more epic things afoot this year...), so doing this update now.














































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
74/171FAN266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
plain174
rel4170
dlsterner167
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
SkyPesos86
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
mapman107124
kphoger22
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
BlueOutback719
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on April 01, 2022, 10:28:16 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on April 01, 2022, 09:35:28 AM
The St. Louis area has an easily-accessible 366: the Missouri State Route 366.
MO 366 is probably one of the first routes I've been on
in my lifetime.

But for those that happen to pass by St Louis on EB I-44, a pretty easy way to get it is to use exit 277A to MO 366, then turn onto NB Lindbergh to get back to I-44. Also gets you 61 or 67, if you're missing one of those numbers (which neither seem to be a common number in this thread anyways).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 11:32:55 AM
Looks like you're missing froggie with 379.

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=24342.msg2694816#msg2694816
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 01, 2022, 01:09:07 PM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 11:32:55 AM
Looks like you're missing froggie with 379.

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=24342.msg2694816#msg2694816
Nah.  That was a number under whatever cockamamie conditions they were discussing.  I'll let froggie clarify.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on April 01, 2022, 02:56:46 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on April 01, 2022, 06:14:14 AM
Quote from: webny99 on March 31, 2022, 10:30:52 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on March 31, 2022, 09:11:52 PM
I clinched MD 247 Sunday so I am now at the infamous 266.

What's infamous about 266? NY has a 266 which would be pretty easy to get on a trip to the Buffalo/Niagara Falls area.

It is the first number that I cannot clinch in my usual clinching states of VA, MD, DE, PA, NC, NJ, and WV. (though NY probably does fit this list).

Yes, I know about OH 266 and NY 266.  What annoys me more is that I could have gotten some of MO 266 last September had I realized it.

I will have the same problem eventually, having already noted that OH 266 is probably my best chance to get that number.

If only the proposed I-266 in DC wasn't cancelled ...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 05:13:58 PM
Quote from: Rothman on April 01, 2022, 01:09:07 PM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 11:32:55 AM
Looks like you're missing froggie with 379.

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=24342.msg2694816#msg2694816
Nah.  That was a number under whatever cockamamie conditions they were discussing.  I'll let froggie clarify.

Not rolling with it is for ______.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on April 01, 2022, 05:48:57 PM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 05:13:58 PM
Quote from: Rothman on April 01, 2022, 01:09:07 PM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 11:32:55 AM
Looks like you're missing froggie with 379.

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=24342.msg2694816#msg2694816
Nah.  That was a number under whatever cockamamie conditions they were discussing.  I'll let froggie clarify.

Not rolling with it is for ______.

It wasn't clear if MN 323 was driven while it was still posted as such. I assume most people would not count driving a route only after it was decommissioned.

Though if that became acceptable, folks who have driven lots of secondary roads in Florida, South Carolina and even Virginia will be in luck.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 06:01:44 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on April 01, 2022, 05:48:57 PM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 05:13:58 PM
Quote from: Rothman on April 01, 2022, 01:09:07 PM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 11:32:55 AM
Looks like you're missing froggie with 379.

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=24342.msg2694816#msg2694816
Nah.  That was a number under whatever cockamamie conditions they were discussing.  I'll let froggie clarify.

Not rolling with it is for ______.

It wasn't clear if MN 323 was driven while it was still posted as such. I assume most people would not count driving a route only after it was decommissioned.

Though if that became acceptable, folks who have driven lots of secondary roads in Florida, South Carolina and even Virginia will be in luck.

323, then? Misunderstood the post, thinking it was decommissioned after driven upon, which should count.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 01, 2022, 08:56:22 PM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 06:01:44 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on April 01, 2022, 05:48:57 PM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 05:13:58 PM
Quote from: Rothman on April 01, 2022, 01:09:07 PM
Quote from: formulanone on April 01, 2022, 11:32:55 AM
Looks like you're missing froggie with 379.

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=24342.msg2694816#msg2694816
Nah.  That was a number under whatever cockamamie conditions they were discussing.  I'll let froggie clarify.

Not rolling with it is for ______.

It wasn't clear if MN 323 was driven while it was still posted as such. I assume most people would not count driving a route only after it was decommissioned.

Though if that became acceptable, folks who have driven lots of secondary roads in Florida, South Carolina and even Virginia will be in luck.

323, then? Misunderstood the post, thinking it was decommissioned after driven upon, which should count.
Let froggie correct it instead of trying to figure it out for him.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ozarkman417 on April 02, 2022, 03:58:54 PM
My first missing route is 46. Once I pick up a 46 that figure becomes 91.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: roadman65 on April 02, 2022, 11:26:47 PM
US 1, DE1, La 1
US 2, MA 2, FL 2
US 3, NJ 3, FL 3, MA 3, NY 3, OH 3
US4, NJ 4, I-4, GA 4, NC 4, MD 4
US 5, I-5, FL 5, NJ 5, NY 5, VA 5
US 6, SC 6, TX 6
US 7, FL 7, NJ 7,NY 7, KS 7
FL 8, GA 8
US 9, FL 9, SC 9
I-10, FL 10, NJ 10
US 11
US 12, NJ 12
US 13, FL 13
US 14, I-14
US 15, FL 15, NJ 15, NY 15
I-16, US 16
US 17, NY 17
NJ 18
US 19, FL 19, NJ 19
US 20, NJ 20, FL 20


That's part of it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 03, 2022, 12:33:55 AM
Quote from: roadman65 on April 02, 2022, 11:26:47 PM
US 1, DE1, La 1
US 2, MA 2, FL 2
US 3, NJ 3, FL 3, MA 3, NY 3, OH 3
US4, NJ 4, I-4, GA 4, NC 4, MD 4
US 5, I-5, FL 5, NJ 5, NY 5, VA 5
US 6, SC 6, TX 6
US 7, FL 7, NJ 7,NY 7, KS 7
FL 8, GA 8
US 9, FL 9, SC 9
I-10, FL 10, NJ 10
US 11
US 12, NJ 12
US 13, FL 13
US 14, I-14
US 15, FL 15, NJ 15, NY 15
I-16, US 16
US 17, NY 17
NJ 18
US 19, FL 19, NJ 19
US 20, NJ 20, FL 20


That's part of it.
What is this nonsense about being "part of it."?  It's only one number you're after. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on April 03, 2022, 10:10:58 AM
Quote from: roadman65 on April 02, 2022, 11:26:47 PM
US 1, DE1, La 1
US 2, MA 2, FL 2
US 3, NJ 3, FL 3, MA 3, NY 3, OH 3
US4, NJ 4, I-4, GA 4, NC 4, MD 4
US 5, I-5, FL 5, NJ 5, NY 5, VA 5
US 6, SC 6, TX 6
US 7, FL 7, NJ 7,NY 7, KS 7
FL 8, GA 8
US 9, FL 9, SC 9
I-10, FL 10, NJ 10
US 11
US 12, NJ 12
US 13, FL 13
US 14, I-14
US 15, FL 15, NJ 15, NY 15
I-16, US 16
US 17, NY 17
NJ 18
US 19, FL 19, NJ 19
US 20, NJ 20, FL 20


That’s part of it.

Strolling through your Flickr, you've been on:

US 21, US 22, LA 23, FL 24, GA 25, NY 26, US 27, NY 28, FL 29, I-30, US 31, GA 32, US 33...

I can't find a photo showing you've been on "34", so there's a starting point for your research. Maybe South Carolina 34?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on April 03, 2022, 10:17:30 AM
It will be a challenge to get 19 and 21 for me as MA 19 and MA 21 are on the other side of the state from me, the former being a rural short route. But MA 21 meets I-90, so it’s easier to get. I plan to take a trip out that way to get those two.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on April 05, 2022, 04:29:08 PM
I've now been on Eje Metropolitano 22 in Monterrey, so I'm going to have to re-think mine.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: averageroadgeek on April 05, 2022, 09:33:20 PM
After coming across this thread I tried to figure out my answer. It appears to be 37. Before that, I've been on US 1, US 2, US 3, US 4, US 5, US 6, US 7, MA 8, US 9, I-10, US 11, MA 12, MA/NH 13, US 14, I-15, I-16, NY 17, NH/VT 18, MA 19, US 20, MA 21, NY 22, MN 23, I-24 (not for very long...but it still counts), I-25, I-26, US 27, MA 28, US 29, I-30, US 31, MA 32, CT 33, MN 34, I-35, and US 36.
I'm a bit far from I-37 and there is no US 37. The states I spend the most time in are CO, MA, and NY: There is no CO 37, my hometown is in western mass far away from MA 37. NY 37, on the other hand, isn't too far from where my summer residence is. Maybe I can get it there.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on April 06, 2022, 09:11:18 AM
Quote from: kphoger on April 05, 2022, 04:29:08 PM
I've now been on Eje Metropolitano 22 in Monterrey, so I'm going to have to re-think mine.

I'll keep digging into the maps, but I think this only bumps me up to 26.

It's possible I've been on CO-26 at some point, but I can't count it for sure.
I've driven through an intersection with KS-26, but never on the highway itself.
I've probably been within a half-mile of US-26, but not actually on it.
I can't come up with a single Minnesota county highway 26 that I've been on.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on April 24, 2022, 06:34:01 PM
The lowest numbered route I haven't been on is now 184

This weekend I drove down to Virginia and snagged VA 167.  Also picked up VA 251, VA 252, VA 254 for future use.  Gotta plan ahead :)

Quote from: Rothman on October 19, 2021, 05:55:02 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 19, 2021, 05:53:36 PM
Thanks for the suggestions, although I've pretty much settled on VA 167 as the least annoying "167" to get.  It's just off I-81 near Roanoke, which is reasonable for me to travel.  Other 167's that may be closer are out in the middle of East B.F.

Don't be a sissy.  Go out and get US 167.

Rothman, I guess I'm just a sissy.  But at least I don't count county roads, nor unsigned highways.

There's a VA 184 in Cape Charles VA on the Delmarva peninsula, just north of the CBBT.  Have a road trip sketched out to pick it up.  One I have it, I will now be into the 200's.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 24, 2022, 07:28:08 PM
Dang, I'm behind in this thread.  To the desktop!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 24, 2022, 07:43:58 PM
Interesting to see the bumps and additions end up where other roadgeeks are stuck as well.













































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
74/171FAN266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
rel4170
US 89162
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
SkyPesos86
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
BlueOutback719
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
FrCorySticha9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on April 24, 2022, 09:56:54 PM
Clinched GA 162 today, so that means mine is going to go up... but how far up depends on whether you count decommissioned routes. I definitely traveled at least some parts of Utah's SR 181 while it was a valid route, but it got deleted back in 2007. To my knowledge I have never been on another 181.

Lowest unambiguous number I have never traveled is 188.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 24, 2022, 11:37:09 PM


Quote from: US 89 on April 24, 2022, 09:56:54 PM
Clinched GA 162 today, so that means mine is going to go up... but how far up depends on whether you count decommissioned routes. I definitely traveled at least some parts of Utah's SR 181 while it was a valid route, but it got deleted back in 2007. To my knowledge I have never been on another 181.

Lowest unambiguous number I have never traveled is 188.

It's really your decision if you want to be a sissy or not.  Pick a number.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bassoon1986 on April 25, 2022, 09:00:00 AM
I am up to 109!


iPhone
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on April 25, 2022, 09:22:29 AM
Quote from: Rothman on April 24, 2022, 11:37:09 PM
Quote from: US 89 on April 24, 2022, 09:56:54 PM
Clinched GA 162 today, so that means mine is going to go up... but how far up depends on whether you count decommissioned routes. I definitely traveled at least some parts of Utah's SR 181 while it was a valid route, but it got deleted back in 2007. To my knowledge I have never been on another 181.

Lowest unambiguous number I have never traveled is 188.

It's really your decision if you want to be a sissy or not.  Pick a number.

Well, scanning through the thread it looks like most people don't think counting since-decommissioned routes is sissy behavior... so we'll go with 188.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on April 25, 2022, 09:31:16 AM
Quote from: US 89 on April 25, 2022, 09:22:29 AM
Quote from: Rothman on April 24, 2022, 11:37:09 PM
Quote from: US 89 on April 24, 2022, 09:56:54 PM
Clinched GA 162 today, so that means mine is going to go up... but how far up depends on whether you count decommissioned routes. I definitely traveled at least some parts of Utah's SR 181 while it was a valid route, but it got deleted back in 2007. To my knowledge I have never been on another 181.

Lowest unambiguous number I have never traveled is 188.

It's really your decision if you want to be a sissy or not.  Pick a number.

Well, scanning through the thread it looks like most people don't think counting since-decommissioned routes is sissy behavior... so we'll go with 188.

If it was signed with a number when I drove on it, I count it. If I didn't drive on it until after the sign with the number went away, I don't count it. Otherwise, I'll probably never get past 112.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Evan_Th on April 25, 2022, 01:56:14 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on April 25, 2022, 09:31:16 AM
Quote from: US 89 on April 25, 2022, 09:22:29 AM
Quote from: Rothman on April 24, 2022, 11:37:09 PM
Quote from: US 89 on April 24, 2022, 09:56:54 PM
Clinched GA 162 today, so that means mine is going to go up... but how far up depends on whether you count decommissioned routes. I definitely traveled at least some parts of Utah's SR 181 while it was a valid route, but it got deleted back in 2007. To my knowledge I have never been on another 181.

Lowest unambiguous number I have never traveled is 188.

It's really your decision if you want to be a sissy or not.  Pick a number.

Well, scanning through the thread it looks like most people don't think counting since-decommissioned routes is sissy behavior... so we'll go with 188.

If it was signed with a number when I drove on it, I count it. If I didn't drive on it until after the sign with the number went away, I don't count it. Otherwise, I'll probably never get past 112.

Yep.  Same reason I don't count myself as having clinched I-87 (NC).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: FrCorySticha on April 30, 2022, 12:58:58 AM
I can finally move off of #9. Coming across US 12 from Yakima, WA, to Helena, MT, I was able to make a 60 mile detour to ID 9.

I've been on US 10, ID 11 (also today), US 12, MT 13, WA 14, I-15, MT 16, US 17, SK 18, US 19, US 20, MT 21, US 22, MT 23, MT 24, I-25, US 26, MO 27.

So, now I need to find a highway 28.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on May 04, 2022, 11:40:29 AM
Quote from: FrCorySticha on April 30, 2022, 12:58:58 AM
So, now I need to find a highway 28.

Western Montana's got one of those too!  I ended up clinching it by accident going from Glacier NP to the Columbia River Gorge.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: FrCorySticha on May 04, 2022, 02:45:38 PM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on May 04, 2022, 11:40:29 AM
Quote from: FrCorySticha on April 30, 2022, 12:58:58 AM
So, now I need to find a highway 28.

Western Montana's got one of those too!  I ended up clinching it by accident going from Glacier NP to the Columbia River Gorge.

That's the one I'm thinking of using. It's only about 230 miles away, so a nice day or so road trip could get it. Even make a round trip up to Glacier.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 06, 2022, 08:28:42 AM
I think I caught everyone's moves.  Let me know if something needs to be changed...












































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey428
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Konza316
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
74/171FAN266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89188
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
SkyPesos86
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
FrCorySticha28
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
BlueOutback719
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on May 07, 2022, 07:50:32 AM
With me potentially getting on a route numbered 26 next week, I have the urge to go back to St. Jean Pied de Port and get that elusive 18. It's the closest one to me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: thspfc on May 16, 2022, 04:29:10 PM
Quote from: thspfc on March 30, 2019, 01:58:59 PM
1: Never driven a 1, but I've driven past the northern terminus of IA-1 and the eastern of MN-1.
2: I've driven good chunks of US-2 in Michigan and Wisconsin.
3: Again, I've driven past the eastern terminus of IA-3 but never driven a 3.
4: The majority of I-4 in Florida.
5: Tiny part of MN-5 in downtown St. Paul.
6: Most of US-6 in Colorado, along with its Interstate concurrences in Nebraska and Iowa.
7: Nothing.
8: Parts of US-8 in Wisconsin.
9: Nothing.
10: Parts of US-10 in Wisconsin and Minnesota.
11: Part of WI-11.
12: Most of US-12 in Wisconsin.
13: Part of WI-13.
14: All of US-14 in WI save for the westernmost few miles.
15: Crossed WI-15 on I-41, but never driven a 15.
16: Lots of WI-16.
17: Parts of WI-17.
18: Quite a bit of US-18 in Wisconsin.
19: Clinched WI-19.
20: Part of US-20 in Illinois.
I could go on, but save for the first ten numbers, I have most of them up to 100.
I'm almost finished listing every route I've traveled (to my knowledge, anyways). The numbers up to 100 that I'm missing are 3, 7, 15, 31, 46, 56, 68, 71, 74, 79, 86, 88, 96, and 99. That list is too long  :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on May 16, 2022, 04:31:54 PM
MN3 is a decently important route in the suburban Twin Cities if you ever get out that way.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on June 03, 2022, 06:29:51 PM
Just got home from Illinois.  Locked the front door- Oh, Boy!

Did a little wandering, too, and can report I now have traveled on the following:

316:  Iowa
317:  New Mexico
318:  Pennsylvania
319:  US
320:  New Mexico
321, 322:  US
323:  Louisiana
324:  Arkansas
325:  Oklahoma
326:  Texas
327:  New Mexico
328:  Louisiana
329:  Kentucky
330:  Iowa
331:  Indiana
332:  Texas
333:  Iowa
334:  Tennessee
335:  Interstate
336:  Illinois
337:  Indiana
338:  New Mexico
339:  Pennsylvania
340:  Missouri
341:  Indiana
342:  New Mexico
343:  Pennsylvania
344:  Louisiana
345:  Texas
346:  Tennessee
347:  Arizona
348:  Colorado
349:  Texas
350:  Missouri
351:  Illinois
352:  Indiana
353:  Louisiana
354:  Texas
355:  Interstate
356:  Texas
357:  Louisiana
358:  Texas
359:  New Mexico
360:  US
361:  Texas
362, 363:  Louisiana
364:  Missouri
365:  Arkansas
366, 367:  Missouri
368:  Kansas
369:  Interstate
370, 371:  Missouri
372, 373, 374:  New Mexico
375, 376:  Interstate
377:  US

Have a few blanks beyond this filled in and some empty spaces on the list targeted.  Will report back.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Max Rockatansky on June 03, 2022, 07:17:11 PM
Quote from: Konza on June 03, 2022, 06:29:51 PM
Just got home from Illinois.  Locked the front door- Oh, Boy!

Why is Illinois so flat?  :-/

Not sure if you are in on the joke but you said the "I"  word.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on June 03, 2022, 08:21:49 PM
Quote from: Konza on June 03, 2022, 06:29:51 PM

336:  Illinois

351:  Illinois


Quote from: Max Rockatansky on June 03, 2022, 07:17:11 PM
Why is Illinois so flat?

Ironically, here are views of the only two Illinois state routes on his list:

https://goo.gl/maps/rVmUEXd9dv91wTpo8
https://goo.gl/maps/h44ri1j5LGiU9Ww16
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on June 05, 2022, 02:47:46 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 07, 2021, 10:56:15 AM
This is the kind of persistence and "someone needs to reconsider their life's priorities" kind of determination that I like to see in Operation: Get Oscar, whether you move up a couple hundred slots or one.



Holding you to this admiration whether I move 162 spots or just 1.

Took an 18.5 hr drive yesterday structured specifically to drive PA 428.  New lowest number not driven is 429.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 06, 2022, 09:08:22 AM
I think I did this right...













































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
Konza378
jayhawkco361
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
74/171FAN266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89188
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
SkyPesos86
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
FrCorySticha28
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
BlueOutback719
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on June 06, 2022, 09:23:38 AM
SEWIGuy and I need to do a trip to downstate Illinois to get IL 108.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SEWIGuy on June 06, 2022, 09:45:35 AM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on June 06, 2022, 09:23:38 AM
SEWIGuy and I need to do a trip to downstate Illinois to get IL 108.


WI-108 is over by La Crosse, but I just don't think I have ever been on it. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on June 06, 2022, 10:03:47 AM
Quote from: SEWIGuy on June 06, 2022, 09:45:35 AM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on June 06, 2022, 09:23:38 AM
SEWIGuy and I need to do a trip to downstate Illinois to get IL 108.


WI-108 is over by La Crosse, but I just don't think I have ever been on it. 

I was all over Wisconsin for work from 1999-2005 and if I'd been into collecting counties and route numbers back then, I'd be a lot farther along in both categories.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on June 06, 2022, 12:46:33 PM
Quote from: SEWIGuy on June 06, 2022, 09:45:35 AM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on June 06, 2022, 09:23:38 AM
SEWIGuy and I need to do a trip to downstate Illinois to get IL 108.

WI-108 is over by La Crosse, but I just don't think I have ever been on it.

IL-108 is easy to reach from Interstate 55, but WI-108 is easy to reach from Interstate 90. I personally wish to drive Illinois 108 so I can take a ride on the Kampsville ferry!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on June 07, 2022, 12:39:14 AM
Or just find a reason to visit Modesto.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on June 07, 2022, 07:18:45 AM
Quote from: Konza on June 07, 2022, 12:39:14 AM
Or just find a reason to visit Modesto.

"Someone is going to meet me there and hand me a six figure check" is about the only reason I can think of.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on June 24, 2022, 10:31:12 AM
Had to travel to Corpus for business. I ran over to quick travel on TX361, so now I'm up to 373 379.

All the 373's I can drive to:
AZ373 - 9h 47m
FM373 (TX) - 10h 50m
NV373 - 12h 59m
SK373 - 15h 12m
OH373 - 18h 48m
MD373 - 21h 32m
VA373 - 21h 33m
FL373 - 23h 28m
MD373 - 25h
NY373 - 28h
QC373 - 32h

Might be a while.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on June 24, 2022, 12:35:01 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on June 24, 2022, 10:31:12 AM
Had to travel to Corpus for business. I ran over to quick travel on TX361, so now I'm up to 373.

I was just there 2 weeks ago and the humidity with a constant breeze was something else. At least it didn't rain, so it made the rare opportunity of convertible rental car right on the edge of tolerable.

Arkansas and Tennessee also have 373's, but they're not exactly close to you.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on June 24, 2022, 12:38:07 PM
Quote from: formulanone on June 24, 2022, 12:35:01 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on June 24, 2022, 10:31:12 AM
Had to travel to Corpus for business. I ran over to quick travel on TX361, so now I'm up to 373.

I was just there 2 weeks ago and the humidity with a constant breeze was something else. At least it didn't rain, so it made the rare opportunity of convertible rental car right on the edge of tolerable.

Arkansas and Tennessee also have 373's, but they're not exactly close to you.

Ha. Actually looking for the other 373s, I found one I know I've been on - Montana Secondary Route 373. Had lunch at the Corvallis Tavern. Off to figure out if I accidentally was on any of my other missing routes.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on June 24, 2022, 12:43:22 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on June 24, 2022, 12:38:07 PM
Quote from: formulanone on June 24, 2022, 12:35:01 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on June 24, 2022, 10:31:12 AM
Had to travel to Corpus for business. I ran over to quick travel on TX361, so now I'm up to 373.

I was just there 2 weeks ago and the humidity with a constant breeze was something else. At least it didn't rain, so it made the rare opportunity of convertible rental car right on the edge of tolerable.

Arkansas and Tennessee also have 373's, but they're not exactly close to you.

Just ran through the Wikipedia page. I'll look those up and add them to my list.

TN 373 is halfway between Huntsville and Nashville (about an hour apart from each) and AR 373 is about an 45 minute drive NW of Memphis.

Not really near much of anything.

Arizona's Highway 373 at least seems to be the most scenic of the bunch, but it's also a dead-end route.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on June 24, 2022, 12:58:07 PM
See my edited reply above. Apparently there's also a NM373 that didn't make the wiki.

Looks like my lowest is now 379.

NV379 - 11h 17m
MT SR279 - 12h 9m
SK379 - 13h 22m
AR379 - 14h 2m
LA379 - 16h 58m
TN379 - 17h 17m
KY379 - 17h 22m
OH379 - 19h 33m
VA379 - 25h

The two closest to interstates are MT SR379, which has a direct exit to I-15, and LA379 which is close to I-10 in Lake Charles. My sister is moving to Richmond, so I might be able to nab VA379 when I go to visit.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 24, 2022, 01:32:05 PM
I believe JayhawkCO has finally made up his mind, so:














































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
74/171FAN266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89188
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
SkyPesos86
chesapeake25684
jlam67
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
FrCorySticha28
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
BlueOutback719
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on June 24, 2022, 01:41:08 PM
Just got 67 in San Angelo, so I'm up to... 68.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 24, 2022, 03:39:07 PM
Well, okay, then.














































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
74/171FAN266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89188
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
SkyPesos86
chesapeake25684
jlam68
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
FrCorySticha28
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
BlueOutback719
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on June 26, 2022, 04:01:05 PM
On my way back from Vermont today, I dropped into Western Massachusetts and picked up MA 19 and MA 21, so I am now up to 34.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 27, 2022, 01:59:18 PM
Ok.  You might want to check on your lat/long coordinates, Bluey.















































oscar609
formulanone558
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87336
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
74/171FAN266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89188
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
SkyPesos86
chesapeake25684
jlam68
Eth63
BrianP53
Bickendan48
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
BlueOutback734
Evan_Th33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
FrCorySticha28
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on July 03, 2022, 01:35:15 AM
woop woop woop
0: CZE D0, HUN M0, BEL R0
1: ASIA AH1, AUT A1, CHE A1, CZE D1, DEU A3, B1, ENG A1, FRA A1, HUN M1, F1, SVK D1, CAN TCH/BC 1, USA CA 1, ND 1, ORH 1
2: AUT A2, CHE A2, CZE D2, DEU B2r, ENG A2, HUN M2, F2, IND NH 2 (former, still signed), 2B (former, still signed), WB 2, NLD A2, SVK D2, USA US 2, CA 2, MO 2, ORH 2
3: BEL A3, CHE A3, FRA A3, HUN F3, USA CA 3, MN 3, ND 3, ORH 3
4: ENG M4, A4, FRA A4, HUN F4, ITA A4, SVK D4, USA CA 4, WA 4, ORH 4
5: AUT A4, CAN ON 5, FRA A5, N5, USA I-5, US 5, MN 5, ORH 5
6: CAN ON 6, FRA A6, N6, USA US 6, MN 6, OR 6, WA 6, ORH 6
7: CZE D7, DEU A7, HUN M7, IND WB 7, USA US 7, MO 7, NY 7, WA 7, ORH 7
8: AUT A8, DEU A8, IND WB 8, USA NY 8, OR 8
9: CHE A9, DEU A9, USA US 9, CO 9, NY 9N, ORH 9
10: HUN F10, USA I-10, US 10, OR 10, ORH 10
11: CZE D11, BEL R11, USA OR 11
12: AUT A12, BEL A12, IND NH 12, USA I-12, US 12, VT 12
13: AUT A13, CHE A13, IND WB 13, USA MN 13, WI 13
14: AUT A14, IND WB 14, USA US 14, CA 14T, NM 14, WA 14, VT 14, ORH 14
15: EUR E15, USA I-15, CO 15, CT 15, MN 15, VT 15, ORH 15
16: AUT S16, USA CA 16, MN 16, WI 16, ORH 16
17: USA CO 17, NM 17, VT 17, ORH 17
18: USA US 18, CA 18, OR 18, ORH 18
19: EUR E19, HUN M19, IND NH 19, USA MN 19, OR 19, UT 19, ORH 19
20: ENG M20, A20, BEL R20, USA I-20, US 20, MN 20, ORH 20
21: AUT A21, BEL R21, USA ID 21, MN 21, ORH 21
22: ITA A22, USA CA 22, CT 22 NY 22, OR 22, VT 22A, ORH 22
23: EUR E23, AUT A23, USA US 23, CA 23, MN 23, WI 23, ORH 23
24: CAN ON 24, USA US 24, CA 24, MN 24, WY 24
25: EUR E25, AUT A25, BEL A25, ENG M25, USA I-25, ID 25, MN 25, ORH 25
26: FRA A26, USA US 26, MI 26, ORH 26
27: EUR E27, BEL A27, USA ID27, IA 27, MN 27, OR 27, ORH 27
28: USA MI 28, UT 28, ORH 28
29: USA I-29, NY 29, ORH 29
30: USA US 30, MN 30, WI 30, UT 30, ORH 30
31: FRA A31, USA ORH 31
32: USA NY 32, ORH 32
33: USA CA 33, ORH 33
34: EUR E34, USA MN 34, OR 34, SD 34
35: EUR E35, CZE D35, USA OR 35, WI 35, ORH 35
36: USA US 36, CA 36, OR 36
37: USA OR 37, SD 37T, ORH 37
38: USA CA 39, MI 38, OR 38, ORH 38
39: FRA A39, USA CA 39, OR 39, ORH 39
40: EUR E40, ENG A40, USA I-40, US 40, ORH 40
41: EUR E41, USA US 41, ORH 41
42: EUR E42, USA OR 42
43: EUR E43, USA MN 43, MO 43, OR 43, ORH 43
44: EUR E44, USA I-44, US 44, CA 44, ID 44, MN 44, SD 44
45: EUR E45, USA I-45, US 45, SD 45, ORH 45
46: USA CA 46, OR 46, ORH 46
47: USA MN 47, OR 47, ORH 47
48: USA ORH 48
49: USA I-49, US 49, ORH 49
50: USA US 50, MN 50, NY 50, WY 50, ORH 50
51: USA US 51, MN 51, OR 51, ORH 51
52: EUR E52, USA US 52, MO 52
53: USA US 53, OR 53, ORH 53
54: EUR E54, USA ORH 54
55: EUR E55, USA I-55, CA 55, ID 55, MI 55, MN 55
56: EUR E56, USA US 56, MN 56, WI 56
57: ITA A57, USA CA 57, MN 57
58: EUR E58, NLD A58, USA CA 58, CO 58, OR 58, ORH 58
59: EUR E59, NLD A59, USA US 59, MO 59, WY 59
60: EUR E60, USA US 60, CA 60, MN 60, WI 60
61: USA US 61, ORH 61
62: EUR E62, USA US 62, MN 62, OR 62
63: USA US 63, SD 63, ORH 63
64: USA US 64, AZ 64, MI 64, MN 64, ORH 64
65: EUR E65, USA US 65, MN 65
66: USA CA 66, MO 66, OR 66, ORH 66
67: EUR E67, USA US 67, NY 67, ORH 67
68: USA CA 68, MN 68, NM 68, ORH 68
69: USA I-69, US 69, ORH 69
70: EUR E70, USA I-70, US 70, OR 70, ORH 70
71: EUR E71, USA US 71, CA 71, UT 71
72: USA ORH 72
73: USA CA 73, MN 73
74: USA NM 74, NY 74
75: EUR E75, USA I-75, US 75
76: USA MN 76, NM 76, UT 76
77: USA MI 77, MN 77
78: USA WI 78
79: USA SD 79
80: USA I-80, US 80, MN 80
81: USA ORH 81
82: USA OR 82, WI 82
83: FRA N83, USA US 83, CA 83
84: USA I-84, US 84, CA 84
85: USA US 85
86: FRA A86, USA MO 86
87: USA I-87, US 87, MN 87, SD 87
88: <- lowest route not traveled
89: USA I-89, US 89, CA 89, SD 89
90: USA I-90, US 90, CA 90
91: CAN BC 91, USA I-91, CA 91, ORH 91
92: USA UT 92, ORH 92
93: USA US 93, ORH 93
94: USA I-94, MI 94
95: DEU A95, USA I-95, US 95, MN 95
96: DEU A96, USA US 96
97: USA US 97
98: USA US 98
99: CAN BC 99, DEU 99, USA CA 99, OR99, WA 99
100: ENG A100, USA MN 100, WA 100, VT 100, ORH 100
101: USA US 101
102: USA ORH 102
103: USA OR 103, WA 103, ORH 103
104: FRA N104, USA NM 104, OR 104, WA 104, ORH 104
105: USA I-105, MN 105, WA 105, ORH 105
106: USA NM 106
107: USA WA 107, VT 107
108: USA VT 108
109: <- runner up
110: USA I-110, CA 110, MN 110, WY 110, ORH 110
111: <- third place
112: USA CO 112
113: USA CA 113, USA WI 113
114: IND NH 114
115: USA I-115
116: IND NH 116A
117: no entry
118: USA CA 118
119: no entry
120: USA CA 120, OR 120, UT 120, WY 120, ORH 120
121-122: no entries
123: USA MI 123, ORH 123
124-125: no entries
126: USA OR 126
127-129: no entries
130: USA OR 130, WI 130, ORH 130
131: USA OR 131, WI 131, ORH 131
132-133: no entries
134: USA CA 134
135-137: no entries
138: USA OR 138, ORH 138
139: USA CA 139, MN 139
140: USA NV 140, OR 140, ORH 140
141: USA OR 141, WA 141, ORH 141
142: USA CO 142, ORH 142
143: USA ORH 143
144: USA ORH 144
145: no entry
146: USA UT 146
147-148: no entries
149: USA MN 149, NY 149
150: USA CO 150, ORH 150
151: USA US 151, CA 151, ORH 151
152: no entry
153: USA OR 153, ORH 153
154: USA OR 154, ORH 154
155: USA ORH 155
156: no entry
157: USA ORH 157
158: no entry
159: USA CO 159
160: USA US 160, IA 160, ORH 160
161: USA WA 161, ORH 161
162: USA WI 162, ORH 162
163: USA ORH 163
164: USA OR 164, ORH 164
165: USA US 165
166: no entry
167: USA WA 167
168: no entry
169: USA US 169, CA 169
170: USA CA 170
171: USA ORH 171
172: USA NV 172
173: USA CA 173, OR 173, ORH 173
174: USA ORH 174
175: USA MO 175
176-179: no entries
180: USA US 180, OR 180, ORH 180
181: no entry
182: USA I-182, OR 182, ORH 182
183: no entry
184: USA I-184
185: USA NY 185
186: USA UT 186
187-188: no entries
189: USA I-189, CA 189, ORH 189
190: AUT S190, USA I-190
191: AUT S191, USA US 191, ORH 191
192: no entry
193: USA ORH 193
194: USA I-194, OR 194, ORH 194
195-196: no entries
197: USA US 197, CA 197, MN 197
198: no entry
199: USA US 199
200: USA CA 200, MN 200, MT 200, OR 200, ORH 200
201: USA OR 201, UT 201, ORH 201
202: USA US 202, OR 202
203: USA OR 203
204: no entry
205: USA I-205
206-209: no entry
210: USA I-210, CA 210, MN 210, OR 210, ORH 210
211: USA OR 211, ORH 211
212: USA US 212, OR 212, ORH 212
213: USA OR 213
214: USA OR 214
215: USA I-215, ORH 215
216: no entry
217: USA OR 217
218: USA US 218
219: USA OR 219
220: USA I-220
221: USA NV 221, OR 221
222: USA OR 222, ORH 222
223: USA NV 223, OR 223
224: USA OR 224
225: USA OR 225, ORH 225
226: USA OR 226, ORH 226
227: USA CA 227, ORH 227
228: USA OR 228, ORH 228
229: USA OR 229, MTS 229, ORH 229
230: no entry
231: USA ORH 231
232: no entry
233: USA OR 233
234: no entry
235: USA I-235, ORH 235
236: USA ORH 236
237: no entry
238: USA I-238, OR 238
239: no entry
240: USA OR 240, WA 240, ORH 240
241: no entry
242: USA OR 242
243: no entry
244: USA SD 244
245: USA AR 245
246: USA MN 246
247-248: no entries
249: USA MO 249
250: no entry
251: USA MN 251
252-253: no entries
254: USA CA254
256-258: no entries
259: USA CA 259
260-262: no entries
263: USA CA 263
264: no entry
265: USA CA 265, UT 265
266-268: no entries
269: USA UT 269
270: USA US 270, ORH 270
271: USA CA 271
272: USA ORH 272
273: USA CA 273, OR 273, ORH 273
274-277: no entries
278: USA I-278, NV 278
279: no entry
280: USA I-280, MN 280
281: USA US 281, OR 281, ORH 281
282: USA OR 281, ORH 282
283-284: no entries
285: USA US 285
286: no entry
287: USA US 287, CT 287
288: no entry
289: USA NV 289
290: USA I-290
291: USA NM 291
292: USA MN 292, ORH 292
293-294: no entries
295: USA WY 295
296-297: no entries
298: USA MN 298
299: USA CA 299, MN 299
300-301: no entries
302: ENG A302
303: no entry
304: USA NV 304
305: USA I-305
306-309: no entries
310: USA US 310
311-314: no entries
315: ENG A315
316-323: no entries
324: USA NY 324
325-328: no entries
329: USA NM 329
330: USA CA 330
331-340: no entries
341: USA NV 341, WY 341
342: USA NV 342
343-350: no entries
351: USA OR 351, ORH 351
352-359: no entries
360: USA ORH 360
361-367: no entries
368: USA CO 368
369: USA NM 369
370: USA CO 370, OR 370, ORH 370
371: USA US 37, CO 371, MN 371
372-379: no entries
380: USA I-380, OR 380, ORH 380
381-384: no entries
385: USA US 385
386-390: no entries
391: FRA A391
392-393: no entries
394: USA I-394
395: USA US 395
396-398: no entries
399: USA NM 399
400: no entry
401: CAN ON 401, ENG A401, USA WA 401
402: CAN ON 402
403: CAN ON 403
404: error highway not found
405: USA I-405
406-408: no entries
409: USA WA 409
410: USA WA 410
411: USA WA 411
412-420: no entries
421: EUR E421
422-423: no entries
424: USA ORH 424
425: no entry
426: USA ORH 426
427-429: no entries
430: USA NV 430
431: USA NV 431, ORH 431
432: USA NV 432, WA 432
433: USA WA 433
434: no entry
435: USA I-435
436-441: no entries
442: EUR E442
443: USA NV 443
444: no entry
445: USA NV 445
446-450: no entries
451: USA OR 451, ORH 451
452-460: no entries
461: EUR E461
462-465: no entries
466: USA NM 466
467-469: no entries
470: USA I-470, CO 470
471-474: no entries
475: USA I-475, NM 475
476-479: no entries
480: USA ORH 480
481: no entry
482: USA ORH 482
483: USA ORH 483
484: USA ORH 484
485: USA ORH 485
486-490: no entries
491: USA US 491
492-493: no entries
494: USA I-494
495: USA I-495
496-499: no entries
500: USA WA 500
501: USA OR 501, WA 501
502: USA WA 502
503: USA WA 503
504: USA WA 504
505: USA I-505
506-508: no entries
509: USA WA 509
510: USA I-510
511: no entry
512: USA WA 512
513-514: no entries
515: USA I-515
516: USA WA 516
517: no entry
518: USA WA 518
519: no entry
520: USA WA 520
521: no entry
522: USA NM 522
523-527: no entries
528: USA OR 528
529-532: no entries
533: EUR E533
534: no entry
535: USA I-535, NV 535
536-539: no entries
540: USA I-540
541-548: no entries
549: USA AR 549
550: USA US 550
551: USA OR 551
552: EUR E552
553-555: no entries
556: USA NM 556
567-568: no entries
569: USA OR 569
570-579: no entries
580: USA I-580
581: USA NM 581
582: no entry
583: USA NM 583
584: USA NM 584
585-588: no entries
589: USA NV 589
590-598: no entries
599: USA NM 599, WA 599
600-604: no entries
605: USA I-605
606-609: no entries
610: USA MN 610
611-647: no entries
648: USA NV 648
649-652: no entries
653: USA NV 653
654-658: no entries
659: USA NV 659
660-665: no entries
666: USA US 666 (former)
667: USA NV 667
668-674: no entries
675: USA I-675
676-679: no entries
680: USA I-680
681-693: no entries
694: USA I-694
695-704: no entries
705: USA I-705
706-709: no entries
710: USA I-710, CA 710
711-788: no entries
789: USA WY 789
790-793: no entries
794: USA NV 794
795: USA NV 795
796-800: no entries
801: USA MN 801
802-879: no entries
880: USA I-880
881-894: no entries
895: USA I-895
896-899: no entries
900: USA WA 900
901-979: no entries
980: USA I-980
981-1210: no entries
1211: ENG A1211
1212-3210: no entries
3211: ENG A3211
3212: ENG A3212
3213-5200: no entries
5201: ENG A5201
5202->: no entries
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 03, 2022, 08:41:02 AM
Egads.  What a miserable data dump. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on July 03, 2022, 06:25:04 PM
Too bad the <details> tag doesn't exist on this forum.

You know you could just say 88 and be done with it, right, dude? :P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on July 03, 2022, 06:44:32 PM
I clinched OH 266 on Monday so I am now up to 386.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on July 03, 2022, 08:49:50 PM
Quote from: Bickendan on July 03, 2022, 01:35:15 AM
woop woop woop

You do realize, for this thread, after you got past 88, nothing else you posted mattered.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 03, 2022, 10:30:15 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on July 03, 2022, 08:49:50 PM
Quote from: Bickendan on July 03, 2022, 01:35:15 AM
woop woop woop

You do realize, for this thread, after you got past 88, nothing else you posted mattered.
Eh, whatever.  I saw what he did; made me work for it.  Just looked like an old IBM mainframe data dump.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on July 15, 2022, 02:50:15 PM
Typing this while on I-86 right now, next number for me is 89.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: FrCorySticha on July 15, 2022, 09:27:38 PM
I was able to pick up MT 28 this afternoon, so I'm moving up to 31. Correction: 33
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on July 15, 2022, 09:49:42 PM
Moved from 558 to...562.

Only one county road in that mix: 561, because it's seemingly everywhere in New Jersey. There's also the CR 561 that's multiplexed with US 27 near Clermont, Florida.

(A trip to the Cincinnati area would knock out both numbers, but I never get around to those two.)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 16, 2022, 11:58:38 PM
*shakes head judgingly*

I will update once back from vacation.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on July 17, 2022, 12:44:22 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 16, 2022, 11:58:38 PM
*shakes head judgingly*

Would you judge if someone got their 215 from Clark County 215?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on July 17, 2022, 01:22:17 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 17, 2022, 12:44:22 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 16, 2022, 11:58:38 PM
*shakes head judgingly*

Would you judge if someone got their 215 from Clark County 215?

Yes, he would.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on July 17, 2022, 10:47:51 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on July 17, 2022, 01:22:17 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 17, 2022, 12:44:22 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 16, 2022, 11:58:38 PM
*shakes head judgingly*

Would you judge if someone got their 215 from Clark County 215?

Yes, he would.

It's the only county road in the mix, and it overlaps a state route. Put me at 561, if it shall appease the gods.

1-through-560 are all state/provincial levels or higher.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 17, 2022, 11:45:30 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on July 17, 2022, 01:22:17 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 17, 2022, 12:44:22 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 16, 2022, 11:58:38 PM
*shakes head judgingly*

Would you judge if someone got their 215 from Clark County 215?

Yes, he would.
*judges and judges and judges*
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Duke87 on July 22, 2022, 08:53:17 PM
After driving part of WY 336 a few days ago, my lowest missing number is now 353
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on July 22, 2022, 11:51:37 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 17, 2022, 12:44:22 AM
Would you judge if someone got their 215 from Clark County 215?

With I-215 that close by? If someone actually did that, I'd be convinced they'd been on I-215 too and used CC 215 just to spite Rothman.   :-P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on July 23, 2022, 08:08:08 AM
Quote from: webny99 on July 22, 2022, 11:51:37 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 17, 2022, 12:44:22 AM
Would you judge if someone got their 215 from Clark County 215?

With I-215 that close by? If someone actually did that, I'd be convinced they'd been on I-215 too and used CC 215 just to spite Rothman.   :-P

Not necessarily–suppose someone flew into Vegas and then got around town in an Uber, where they had no say in the route?

But maybe I'll do that on purpose when I make it out there, just to spite Rothman. :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on July 23, 2022, 08:43:20 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 23, 2022, 08:08:08 AM
Quote from: webny99 on July 22, 2022, 11:51:37 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 17, 2022, 12:44:22 AM
Would you judge if someone got their 215 from Clark County 215?

With I-215 that close by? If someone actually did that, I'd be convinced they'd been on I-215 too and used CC 215 just to spite Rothman.   :-P

Not necessarily–suppose someone flew into Vegas and then got around town in an Uber, where they had no say in the route?

But maybe I'll do that on purpose when I make it out there, just to spite Rothman. :-D

I've been on both I/CC 215 so that would count for me as having been on a 215.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on July 23, 2022, 10:43:28 AM
Quote from: BlueOutback7 on July 23, 2022, 08:43:20 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 23, 2022, 08:08:08 AM
Quote from: webny99 on July 22, 2022, 11:51:37 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 17, 2022, 12:44:22 AM
Would you judge if someone got their 215 from Clark County 215?

With I-215 that close by? If someone actually did that, I'd be convinced they'd been on I-215 too and used CC 215 just to spite Rothman.   :-P

Not necessarily–suppose someone flew into Vegas and then got around town in an Uber, where they had no say in the route?

But maybe I'll do that on purpose when I make it out there, just to spite Rothman. :-D

I've been on both I/CC 215 so that would count for me as having been on a 215.

Yeah, but the thing is that Rothman doesn't like it when people count county routes. So the question was how would he feel about someone being on CC 215, since although it's a county route, it's also a freeway, so it's not like someone is counting a podunk local road like most CRs tend to be.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 28, 2022, 01:22:34 AM
Think I got everyone.



















































oscar609
formulanone562
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
74/171FAN386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89188
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
csw153
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
Eth63
BrianP53
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
BlueOutback734
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on July 28, 2022, 01:19:30 PM
Just realized for those that are in front of me, I've gotten 3 of the 5 numbers they're stuck on:

AZ386
FL429
451
NV562
609
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on July 28, 2022, 03:21:13 PM
I'm planning to clinch NY 386 next week to rectify this for me since VA 386 does not physically or officially exist anymore.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on July 29, 2022, 10:34:27 AM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on July 28, 2022, 01:19:30 PM
Just realized for those that are in front of me, I've gotten 3 of the 5 numbers they're stuck on:

AZ386
FL429
451
NV562
609

That's an interesting exercise: For all the numbers holding up others who are higher than me on the leaderboard, how many have I traveled on?  Oddly enough, I have half of the numbers my superiors are stuck on (more than I expected).

245- Indiana
330- Iowa
333- Iowa
334- Ohio
353- Ohio
378- Ohio
562- Ohio
I have nothing to show for 248, 268, 379, 386, 429, 451, or 609.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on July 29, 2022, 10:40:05 AM
I have 609 (thanks, Ocean Springs (https://flic.kr/p/2mzk4YN)) but still have a several more in the 500s to capture.

Side note: user michih at Travel Mapping is up to 767, since Germany seems to use nearly every number up to 999.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on July 29, 2022, 11:03:22 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on July 29, 2022, 10:34:27 AM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on July 28, 2022, 01:19:30 PM
Just realized for those that are in front of me, I've gotten 3 of the 5 numbers they're stuck on:

AZ386
FL429
451
NV562
609

That's an interesting exercise: For all the numbers holding up others who are higher than me on the leaderboard, how many have I traveled on?  Oddly enough, I have half of the numbers my superiors are stuck on (more than I expected).

245- Indiana
330- Iowa
333- Iowa
334- Ohio
353- Ohio
378- Ohio
562- Ohio
I have nothing to show for 248, 268, 379, 386, 429, 451, or 609.

Several people could benefit from a visit to Indiana:

245 IN
154 IN
149 IN
148 IN
111 IN
109 IN
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on July 29, 2022, 11:39:10 PM
I got 3 of the top 4 on the leaderboard, counting a hidden route.

OH 562, QEW (ON 451, go ahead and call me a sissy Rothman  :)), FL 429.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: flan on July 30, 2022, 12:02:31 AM
54. Although hopefully I'll drive on ND 54 sometime soon and the number will jump to 85. I've also crossed WI 54 and (what was at the time) MN 54 but haven't actually driven on them.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 30, 2022, 12:10:30 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 29, 2022, 11:39:10 PM
I got 3 of the top 4 on the leaderboard, counting a hidden route.

OH 562, QEW (ON 451, go ahead and call me a sissy Rothman  :)), FL 429.
A hidden route number?  Thou must be shunned.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on July 30, 2022, 06:03:11 AM
I see someone is stuck in a number I have readily available: N-330 Spain (which passes through my hometown) :sombrero:.

Looks like I'll have a shot at 18 soon...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on July 30, 2022, 07:24:25 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 30, 2022, 12:10:30 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 29, 2022, 11:39:10 PM
I got 3 of the top 4 on the leaderboard, counting a hidden route.

OH 562, QEW (ON 451, go ahead and call me a sissy Rothman  :)), FL 429.
A hidden route number?  Thou must be shunned.

What about RI 51, which is fully signed on Google Maps, yet isn't signed in the wild? It's the only 51 in New England.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 30, 2022, 08:42:20 AM
Quote from: BlueOutback7 on July 30, 2022, 07:24:25 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 30, 2022, 12:10:30 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 29, 2022, 11:39:10 PM
I got 3 of the top 4 on the leaderboard, counting a hidden route.

OH 562, QEW (ON 451, go ahead and call me a sissy Rothman  :)), FL 429.
A hidden route number?  Thou must be shunned.

What about RI 51, which is fully signed on Google Maps, yet isn't signed in the wild? It's the only 51 in New England.
Please see the thread on why Google Maps f****** sucks.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on July 30, 2022, 08:45:26 AM
I believe RI 51 counts, but make sure you have the correct routing. Every source seems to think it goes a different way, and all but one are wrong.

Also, wasn't there a discussion about how QEW isn't actually ON 451 and it's truly unnumbered in actuality?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on July 30, 2022, 09:04:41 AM
Quote from: BlueOutback7 on July 30, 2022, 07:24:25 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 30, 2022, 12:10:30 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 29, 2022, 11:39:10 PM
I got 3 of the top 4 on the leaderboard, counting a hidden route.

OH 562, QEW (ON 451, go ahead and call me a sissy Rothman  :)), FL 429.
A hidden route number?  Thou must be shunned.

What about RI 51, which is fully signed on Google Maps, yet isn't signed in the wild? It's the only 51 in New England.
Google maps also fully sign I-26 between Asheville and Johnson City, even though it's not yet in reality. I wouldn't trust it over real life from that case alone.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on July 30, 2022, 09:09:06 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 30, 2022, 09:04:41 AM
Google maps also fully sign I-26 between Asheville and Johnson City, even though it's not yet in reality. I wouldn't trust it over real life from that case alone.

That doesn't quite matter for this thread, though, as Future 26 is an actual designation, and it's still a route numbered 26.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on July 30, 2022, 09:28:35 AM
Quote from: 1 on July 30, 2022, 09:09:06 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 30, 2022, 09:04:41 AM
Google maps also fully sign I-26 between Asheville and Johnson City, even though it's not yet in reality. I wouldn't trust it over real life from that case alone.

That doesn't quite matter for this thread, though, as Future 26 is an actual designation, and it's still a route numbered 26.
I'm more referring to why Google maps sort of suck, and not saying it should or shouldn't count for this thread (that's for each person to decide).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on July 31, 2022, 01:22:45 AM
Quote from: 1 on July 30, 2022, 09:09:06 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 30, 2022, 09:04:41 AM
Google maps also fully sign I-26 between Asheville and Johnson City, even though it’s not yet in reality. I wouldn’t trust it over real life from that case alone.

That doesn't quite matter for this thread, though, as Future 26 is an actual designation, and it's still a route numbered 26.

But it’s not 26 yet...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on July 31, 2022, 11:50:14 AM
Quote from: US 89 on July 31, 2022, 01:22:45 AM
Quote from: 1 on July 30, 2022, 09:09:06 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 30, 2022, 09:04:41 AM
Google maps also fully sign I-26 between Asheville and Johnson City, even though it's not yet in reality. I wouldn't trust it over real life from that case alone.

That doesn't quite matter for this thread, though, as Future 26 is an actual designation, and it's still a route numbered 26.

But it's not 26 yet...
It's only 25? It'll grow up soon :bigass:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: csw on July 31, 2022, 01:21:03 PM
Move me up to 174.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: SkyPesos on July 31, 2022, 01:58:54 PM
Quote from: Bickendan on July 31, 2022, 11:50:14 AM
Quote from: US 89 on July 31, 2022, 01:22:45 AM
Quote from: 1 on July 30, 2022, 09:09:06 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 30, 2022, 09:04:41 AM
Google maps also fully sign I-26 between Asheville and Johnson City, even though it's not yet in reality. I wouldn't trust it over real life from that case alone.

That doesn't quite matter for this thread, though, as Future 26 is an actual designation, and it's still a route numbered 26.

But it's not 26 yet...
It's only 25? It'll grow up soon :bigass:
You're not wrong... (https://goo.gl/maps/WWdSuptexSFpvKTB6)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on July 31, 2022, 07:26:33 PM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 31, 2022, 01:58:54 PM
Quote from: Bickendan on July 31, 2022, 11:50:14 AM
Quote from: US 89 on July 31, 2022, 01:22:45 AM
Quote from: 1 on July 30, 2022, 09:09:06 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on July 30, 2022, 09:04:41 AM
Google maps also fully sign I-26 between Asheville and Johnson City, even though it's not yet in reality. I wouldn't trust it over real life from that case alone.

That doesn't quite matter for this thread, though, as Future 26 is an actual designation, and it's still a route numbered 26.

But it's not 26 yet...
It's only 25? It'll grow up soon :bigass:
You're not wrong... (https://goo.gl/maps/WWdSuptexSFpvKTB6)
"!"
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 31, 2022, 09:50:28 PM
If I missed your update because of silly, distracting conversations going on in this thread, let me know.




















































oscar609
formulanone562
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
74/171FAN386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89188
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
BlueOutback734
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 07, 2022, 06:58:55 AM
I am up to 427 after clinching NY 386 on Friday.  Even though 389 will still be on my TM missing numbers list, I did clinch VA 389 in April.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kirbykart on August 07, 2022, 10:11:53 AM
Mine is just 7.
1: US 1
2: US 2, NY/MA 2
3: US 3
4: US 4 (Spaulding Turnpike)
5: NY 5
6: US 6
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 07, 2022, 04:30:43 PM
Somebody's out to get Oscar...




















































oscar609
formulanone562
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89188
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
BlueOutback734
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
kirbykart7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on August 07, 2022, 05:06:15 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 07, 2022, 04:30:43 PM
Somebody's out to get Oscar...


oscar609
formulanone562
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427

To make that just a little harder, I'm now up to 621. Last week, returning home on I-85, I saw Detour SR (Virginia state secondary) 609 signs in southern Virginia. I followed those signs to part of the actual SR 609, which I traveled for a few miles between SR 687 and VA 40, before returning to the Interstates.

I'm still missing a bunch of 62x routes (https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=oscar&), not clear how I can snag those. Right now, I'm not trying hard to find them, unless a sign for one of them shows up right in my face.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 07, 2022, 07:15:18 PM
Oscar's sweatin'...




















































oscar621
formulanone562
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89188
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Scott5114101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
webny9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
BlueOutback734
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
kirbykart7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on August 08, 2022, 09:06:28 AM
I've actually been on a road numbered 621 :sombrero:. Too bad I'm really far behind.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on August 09, 2022, 11:51:41 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on August 07, 2022, 06:58:55 AM
I am up to 427 after clinching NY 386 on Friday.

Too bad you're not ON 427 (see what I did there...  :-P)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on August 09, 2022, 11:53:41 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 17, 2022, 08:41:17 AM
Still at 47 after finishing my initial data entry and edits. 47 and 68 are my only numbers under 100 not traveled on. TM also shows 57 and 97, but I have been on Onondaga CR 57 and RR 97 near Cambridge, ON.

After scrolling through most of the thread, I've decided on counting county routes as long as they are signed. And I have now been on Dakota CR 47 (MN) - so I am now at 68.

I-68 awaits...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 10, 2022, 12:00:16 AM
Quote from: webny99 on August 09, 2022, 11:53:41 PM
Quote from: webny99 on March 17, 2022, 08:41:17 AM
Still at 47 after finishing my initial data entry and edits. 47 and 68 are my only numbers under 100 not traveled on. TM also shows 57 and 97, but I have been on Onondaga CR 57 and RR 97 near Cambridge, ON.

After scrolling through most of the thread, I've decided on counting county routes as long as they are signed. And I have now been on Dakota CR 47 (MN) - so I am now at 68.

I-68 awaits...
*shakes head disapprovingly*
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on August 10, 2022, 12:17:19 AM
I just got back in from a clinching trip in eastern Oklahoma, which got me both 101 (windy, twisty, and hilly, if you like those sorts of routes!) and 104 (literally goes through flat sod farms). I've been preparing for this, though, by grabbing a few out of state routes that we don't have representation of in Oklahoma. So those two clinches jump me up to 113.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on August 15, 2022, 06:52:37 AM
And I finally got the elusive 18. I had to travel to Italy to pick up SR ex SS 18 near Naples, and dang it, it was one of the wildest roads I've ever seen (entirely built up, crazy traffic), on the way back I'll pay the A3 toll. This puts me up to 27 (I previously said it would be 26, but got briefly on C-26 in Catalonia a while ago).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 17, 2022, 05:53:47 PM
People are working hard...





















































oscar621
formulanone562
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89188
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
BlueOutback734
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
kirbykart7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on August 21, 2022, 02:06:39 AM
In the past couple weeks, I've driven on GA 188, and also eliminated any question on 181 by driving K-181. So mine is now 192. Don't see that changing anytime soon.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 21, 2022, 07:28:00 AM
Quote from: US 89 on August 21, 2022, 02:06:39 AM
In the past couple weeks, I've driven on GA 188, and also eliminated any question on 181 by driving K-181. So mine is now 192. Don't see that changing anytime soon.
So...no Disney World for you... :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on August 21, 2022, 10:34:11 AM
Quote from: Rothman on August 21, 2022, 07:28:00 AM
Quote from: US 89 on August 21, 2022, 02:06:39 AM
In the past couple weeks, I've driven on GA 188, and also eliminated any question on 181 by driving K-181. So mine is now 192. Don't see that changing anytime soon.
So...no Disney World for you... :D

AL 192 in Enterprise is the closest one to Tallahassee. Looks to be an even match between distances for Georgia's SR 192 and US 192 (which will have more traffic).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on August 21, 2022, 11:41:06 PM
Quote from: formulanone on August 21, 2022, 10:34:11 AM
Quote from: Rothman on August 21, 2022, 07:28:00 AM
Quote from: US 89 on August 21, 2022, 02:06:39 AM
In the past couple weeks, I’ve driven on GA 188, and also eliminated any question on 181 by driving K-181. So mine is now 192. Don’t see that changing anytime soon.
So...no Disney World for you... :D

AL 192 in Enterprise is the closest one to Tallahassee. Looks to be an even match between distances for Georgia's SR 192 and US 192 (which will have more traffic).

Heh, I might have to make a detour up to Enterprise whenever I get around to visiting Britton Hill (highest natural point in FL)...

The dumb thing is I went to Disney World as a kid and don't really have much desire to go back anytime soon, but being at the mercy of the Disney bus drivers, I don't think I even entered Osceola County much less traveled any bit of 192...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on August 22, 2022, 06:03:07 PM
Quote from: US 89 on August 21, 2022, 11:41:06 PM
Quote from: formulanone on August 21, 2022, 10:34:11 AM
Quote from: Rothman on August 21, 2022, 07:28:00 AM
Quote from: US 89 on August 21, 2022, 02:06:39 AM
In the past couple weeks, I've driven on GA 188, and also eliminated any question on 181 by driving K-181. So mine is now 192. Don't see that changing anytime soon.
So...no Disney World for you... :D

AL 192 in Enterprise is the closest one to Tallahassee. Looks to be an even match between distances for Georgia's SR 192 and US 192 (which will have more traffic).

Heh, I might have to make a detour up to Enterprise whenever I get around to visiting Britton Hill (highest natural point in FL)...

The dumb thing is I went to Disney World as a kid and don't really have much desire to go back anytime soon, but being at the mercy of the Disney bus drivers, I don't think I even entered Osceola County much less traveled any bit of 192...
I was at Disney last year during the marathon they held. It blocked off the fastest route between our resort and the park, so our bus driver detoured via US 192. And that's how I got that number.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on August 22, 2022, 07:51:45 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on August 22, 2022, 06:03:07 PM
Quote from: US 89 on August 21, 2022, 11:41:06 PM
Quote from: formulanone on August 21, 2022, 10:34:11 AM
Quote from: Rothman on August 21, 2022, 07:28:00 AM
Quote from: US 89 on August 21, 2022, 02:06:39 AM
In the past couple weeks, I’ve driven on GA 188, and also eliminated any question on 181 by driving K-181. So mine is now 192. Don’t see that changing anytime soon.
So...no Disney World for you... :D

AL 192 in Enterprise is the closest one to Tallahassee. Looks to be an even match between distances for Georgia's SR 192 and US 192 (which will have more traffic).

Heh, I might have to make a detour up to Enterprise whenever I get around to visiting Britton Hill (highest natural point in FL)...

The dumb thing is I went to Disney World as a kid and don't really have much desire to go back anytime soon, but being at the mercy of the Disney bus drivers, I don't think I even entered Osceola County much less traveled any bit of 192...
I was at Disney last year during the marathon they held. It blocked off the fastest route between our resort and the park, so our bus driver detoured via US 192. And that's how I got that number.

About 9-10 years ago, the bus driver was caught off-guard on the way to one of the Disney Parks, because there was a bicycle race. So the driver detoured quite a bit, and pointed out landmarks like the credit union, daycare, administrative locations...et al, to keep the dozen of us entertained on that additional 30-minute haul.

Definitely didn't hit up US 192, but at least I know traffic delays have happened to other guests!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 23, 2022, 11:28:50 AM
No Disney for US 89.





















































oscar621
formulanone562
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
hbelkins334
corco333
cl94330
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
BlueOutback734
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
kirbykart7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on August 23, 2022, 03:00:38 PM
I have now been on CT 34 and am typing this while on NJ 36 on my way to the Ocean City, NJ. This bumps me up to the dreaded 48, which will be a tough one because there's no 48 anywhere in New England and the closest one is DE 48 in Wilmington. Though I'll probably get that one at some point because it's easier to get to than NJ 48.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 23, 2022, 03:47:44 PM
NJ 48 is a simple loop via US 40 and US 130 from the NJ Turnpike....
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on September 05, 2022, 01:44:11 PM
Greatly reducing my time on the forum, so this is a tad outdated, but my new lowest is now 338. Grabbed OH SR 330 last month. After 338 (not too hard to grab from my current location) is 348, which I expect will be my upper limit for a while.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 05, 2022, 01:53:04 PM
Not sure how I missed BlueOutback's updates previously, but here we are.






















































oscar621
formulanone562
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94338
hbelkins334
corco333
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
cabiness42108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
kirbykart7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kirbykart on September 05, 2022, 02:10:54 PM
I was recently on NY 7, so now my lowest untraveled number is 13.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on September 05, 2022, 02:50:40 PM
Also, while I've been on a road currently numbered 27, I haven't been on it since it is numbered as such. Guess I need to go back to Tarragona...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 06, 2022, 07:52:43 AM
After a very long time stuck on 108, I finally got a 108 yesterday in Illinois, albeit only a two-block segment.

Lowest number I've not been on is now 147, which I am planning to get this upcoming weekend.

Also, rothman's table needs to reflect my new username.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 06, 2022, 08:55:56 AM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on September 06, 2022, 07:52:43 AM
After a very long time stuck on 108, I finally got a 108 yesterday in Illinois, albeit only a two-block segment.

Lowest number I've not been on is now 147, which I am planning to get this upcoming weekend.

Also, rothman's table needs to reflect my new username.
Heh.  Whoever you were.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 06, 2022, 02:05:14 PM
Changing forum usernames is weird.























































oscar621
formulanone562
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94338
hbelkins334
corco333
Hot Rod Hootenanny268
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
NWI_Irish96147
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 07, 2022, 10:10:43 PM
While my standing didn't change, I spent yesterday & today collecting routes, so my lowest number is now 318.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on September 12, 2022, 03:02:41 PM
I'm up to 577, with no county route numbers.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 12, 2022, 03:07:48 PM
One way or another...























































oscar621
formulanone577
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94338
hbelkins334
corco333
Hot Rod Hootenanny318
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
NWI_Irish96147
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: computerfan0 on September 16, 2022, 03:05:34 PM
For me it would be 9. The N9 in the Republic of Ireland leads to Waterford, a place I have never needed to go. The A9 in Northern Ireland is nonexistent, while the B9 and unsigned C9 also lead to places I have never needed to go.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on September 17, 2022, 01:41:59 AM
Short of going to a different country to grab a route 9, I daresay N9, B9 and/or C9 go to an undefined place you need to go now :bigass:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on September 17, 2022, 06:54:54 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 07, 2022, 10:10:43 PM
While my standing didn't change, I spent yesterday & today collecting routes, so my lowest number is now 318.

Waukesha, Wisconsin is calling.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on September 17, 2022, 09:37:55 PM
Quote from: formulanone on September 17, 2022, 06:54:54 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 07, 2022, 10:10:43 PM
While my standing didn't change, I spent yesterday & today collecting routes, so my lowest number is now 318.

Waukesha, Wisconsin is calling.

NY also has a state route 318, a busy connector route between Auburn and the Thruway.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 18, 2022, 01:10:09 AM
I'm quite content with going to Sharon, Pa, before the end of the month to pick off PA 318.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on September 18, 2022, 09:50:39 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 18, 2022, 01:10:09 AM
I'm quite content with going to Sharon, Pa, before the end of the month to pick off PA 318.


Also, much closer. Forgot about that one; must have had my next trip on my mind.

You can also easily get 418 while you're there.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 02:14:35 PM
Feels like I missed someone...























































oscar621
formulanone577
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94338
hbelkins334
corco333
Hot Rod Hootenanny318
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
dlsterner184
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
NWI_Irish96147
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 02:24:06 PM
Quote from: webny99 on September 17, 2022, 09:37:55 PM
Quote from: formulanone on September 17, 2022, 06:54:54 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 07, 2022, 10:10:43 PM
While my standing didn't change, I spent yesterday & today collecting routes, so my lowest number is now 318.

Waukesha, Wisconsin is calling.

NY also has a state route 318, a busy connector route between Auburn and the Thruway.

It's also a pain in the butt for Regions 3 and 4 of NYSDOT due to it extending just a bit further west than the Seneca County line...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on September 18, 2022, 02:34:02 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 02:24:06 PM
Quote from: webny99 on September 17, 2022, 09:37:55 PM
Quote from: formulanone on September 17, 2022, 06:54:54 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 07, 2022, 10:10:43 PM
While my standing didn't change, I spent yesterday & today collecting routes, so my lowest number is now 318.

Waukesha, Wisconsin is calling.

NY also has a state route 318, a busy connector route between Auburn and the Thruway.

It's also a pain in the butt for Regions 3 and 4 of NYSDOT due to it extending just a bit further west than the Seneca County line...

Curious, how so? (Aren't there many state routes that span multiple regions?)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 04:29:03 PM
Quote from: webny99 on September 18, 2022, 02:34:02 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 02:24:06 PM
Quote from: webny99 on September 17, 2022, 09:37:55 PM
Quote from: formulanone on September 17, 2022, 06:54:54 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 07, 2022, 10:10:43 PM
While my standing didn't change, I spent yesterday & today collecting routes, so my lowest number is now 318.

Waukesha, Wisconsin is calling.

NY also has a state route 318, a busy connector route between Auburn and the Thruway.

It's also a pain in the butt for Regions 3 and 4 of NYSDOT due to it extending just a bit further west than the Seneca County line...

Curious, how so? (Aren't there many state routes that span multiple regions?)
There's a railway crossing and then just a short distance in Region 4.

So, it always involves some sort of handshake agreement in terms of the paving, since we won't just stop at the county line and then you have the buffer with the railroad that comes into play...

...unlike certain municipalities that won't pave or make similar agreements to pave the 100 feet of the road or so beyond their border to the next intersection...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 07:14:58 PM
In California, have never driven on CA-7. Not a single mile. That is, the modern day CA-7 from 1990. The original CA-7 that is today represented by I-405, CA-14, US-395? Never would have driven on it while signed, but have been on some or all of those routes.

CA-3 would be the lowest route number I've never clinched. Been on some segments on it here and there, including the implied concurrency with CA-299. (Although I believe both routes are signed here). When it comes to even-numbered routes, CA-4. Only segment I've been is the freeway alignment between I-5 and CA-99. I have driven on CA-89 from the CA-4 junction to the CA-88 junction, which historically was a concurrency with 89 (and also extended to Nevada via 88 concurrency). Strangely, though, there are still CA-4 shields on this stretch of 89. Not "TO" banners, just straight up CA-4 shields. Not sure why, because it hasn't been concurrent since 1964.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 07:50:34 PM
Quote from: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 07:14:58 PM
In California, have never driven on CA-7. Not a single mile. That is, the modern day CA-7 from 1990. The original CA-7 that is today represented by I-405, CA-14, US-395? Never would have driven on it while signed, but have been on some or all of those routes.

CA-3 would be the lowest route number I've never clinched. Been on some segments on it here and there, including the implied concurrency with CA-299. (Although I believe both routes are signed here). When it comes to even-numbered routes, CA-4. Only segment I've been is the freeway alignment between I-5 and CA-99. I have driven on CA-89 from the CA-4 junction to the CA-88 junction, which historically was a concurrency with 89 (and also extended to Nevada via 88 concurrency). Strangely, though, there are still CA-4 shields on this stretch of 89. Not "TO" banners, just straight up CA-4 shields. Not sure why, because it hasn't been concurrent since 1964.
You haven't been on a route 7 anywhere?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 08:53:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 07:50:34 PM
Quote from: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 07:14:58 PM
In California, have never driven on CA-7. Not a single mile. That is, the modern day CA-7 from 1990. The original CA-7 that is today represented by I-405, CA-14, US-395? Never would have driven on it while signed, but have been on some or all of those routes.

CA-3 would be the lowest route number I've never clinched. Been on some segments on it here and there, including the implied concurrency with CA-299. (Although I believe both routes are signed here). When it comes to even-numbered routes, CA-4. Only segment I've been is the freeway alignment between I-5 and CA-99. I have driven on CA-89 from the CA-4 junction to the CA-88 junction, which historically was a concurrency with 89 (and also extended to Nevada via 88 concurrency). Strangely, though, there are still CA-4 shields on this stretch of 89. Not "TO" banners, just straight up CA-4 shields. Not sure why, because it hasn't been concurrent since 1964.
You haven't been on a route 7 anywhere?
I don't think so, no. When I visited New England, I paralleled US-7 in places but never drove on it. Never drove on either OR-7 or WA-7. Alaska has AK-7 but also avoided it (except for maybe a very short portion when I visited Juneau a long time ago). States beyond that, not ringing a bell.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on September 18, 2022, 09:14:44 PM
Quote from: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 08:53:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 07:50:34 PM
Quote from: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 07:14:58 PM
In California, have never driven on CA-7. Not a single mile. That is, the modern day CA-7 from 1990. The original CA-7 that is today represented by I-405, CA-14, US-395? Never would have driven on it while signed, but have been on some or all of those routes.
If you've done any portion of US 20 between Bend and Idaho, you can claim ORH 7 if you're up for it.
CA-3 would be the lowest route number I've never clinched. Been on some segments on it here and there, including the implied concurrency with CA-299. (Although I believe both routes are signed here). When it comes to even-numbered routes, CA-4. Only segment I've been is the freeway alignment between I-5 and CA-99. I have driven on CA-89 from the CA-4 junction to the CA-88 junction, which historically was a concurrency with 89 (and also extended to Nevada via 88 concurrency). Strangely, though, there are still CA-4 shields on this stretch of 89. Not "TO" banners, just straight up CA-4 shields. Not sure why, because it hasn't been concurrent since 1964.
You haven't been on a route 7 anywhere?
I don't think so, no. When I visited New England, I paralleled US-7 in places but never drove on it. Never drove on either OR-7 or WA-7. Alaska has AK-7 but also avoided it (except for maybe a very short portion when I visited Juneau a long time ago). States beyond that, not ringing a bell.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on September 18, 2022, 09:51:52 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 04:29:03 PM
Quote from: webny99 on September 18, 2022, 02:34:02 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 02:24:06 PM
It's also a pain in the butt for Regions 3 and 4 of NYSDOT due to it extending just a bit further west than the Seneca County line...

Curious, how so? (Aren't there many state routes that span multiple regions?)
There's a railway crossing and then just a short distance in Region 4.

So, it always involves some sort of handshake agreement in terms of the paving, since we won't just stop at the county line and then you have the buffer with the railroad that comes into play...

...unlike certain municipalities that won't pave or make similar agreements to pave the 100 feet of the road or so beyond their border to the next intersection...

Interesting. I would have guessed that most paving projects usually do start/end near the county line. The recent paving on NY 104 seems to have ended near the Monroe/Wayne county line, but not exactly (and maybe it wouldn't have mattered since they're both R4).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 11:27:37 PM
Quote from: webny99 on September 18, 2022, 09:51:52 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 04:29:03 PM
Quote from: webny99 on September 18, 2022, 02:34:02 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 02:24:06 PM
It's also a pain in the butt for Regions 3 and 4 of NYSDOT due to it extending just a bit further west than the Seneca County line...

Curious, how so? (Aren't there many state routes that span multiple regions?)
There's a railway crossing and then just a short distance in Region 4.

So, it always involves some sort of handshake agreement in terms of the paving, since we won't just stop at the county line and then you have the buffer with the railroad that comes into play...

...unlike certain municipalities that won't pave or make similar agreements to pave the 100 feet of the road or so beyond their border to the next intersection...

Interesting. I would have guessed that most paving projects usually do start/end near the county line. The recent paving on NY 104 seems to have ended near the Monroe/Wayne county line, but not exactly (and maybe it wouldn't have mattered since they're both R4).
There's no hard rule.  NYSDOT just doesn't like to leave a short distance of pavement on a state highway out of a project just because of the Regional boundary.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on September 21, 2022, 12:19:04 AM
The lowest-numbered route that I haven't been on is now  232  (it was 184).  Not a single county road in the bunch :)

Took a weekend jaunt to the Hampton Roads area in Virginia and picked up 184, 203, 204, and 205.  Also 239 for future planning.

The closest 232 to me appears to be PA 232 north of Philadelphia, about 120 miles away.  Alternatively, VA 232 in SW Virginia, about 300 miles away. Planning to get PA 232 and PA 248 in a November trip that I'm taking to upstate New York.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on September 21, 2022, 05:01:06 AM
What I see after removing the nested quotes:
Quote from: Bickendan on September 18, 2022, 09:14:44 PM
[empty post]

What should have been:
Quote from: Bickendan on September 18, 2022, 09:14:44 PM
Quote from: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 08:53:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 07:50:34 PM
Quote from: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 07:14:58 PM
In California, have never driven on CA-7. Not a single mile. That is, the modern day CA-7 from 1990. The original CA-7 that is today represented by I-405, CA-14, US-395? Never would have driven on it while signed, but have been on some or all of those routes.

CA-3 would be the lowest route number I've never clinched. Been on some segments on it here and there, including the implied concurrency with CA-299. (Although I believe both routes are signed here). When it comes to even-numbered routes, CA-4. Only segment I've been is the freeway alignment between I-5 and CA-99. I have driven on CA-89 from the CA-4 junction to the CA-88 junction, which historically was a concurrency with 89 (and also extended to Nevada via 88 concurrency). Strangely, though, there are still CA-4 shields on this stretch of 89. Not "TO" banners, just straight up CA-4 shields. Not sure why, because it hasn't been concurrent since 1964.
You haven't been on a route 7 anywhere?
I don't think so, no. When I visited New England, I paralleled US-7 in places but never drove on it. Never drove on either OR-7 or WA-7. Alaska has AK-7 but also avoided it (except for maybe a very short portion when I visited Juneau a long time ago). States beyond that, not ringing a bell.
If you've done any portion of US 20 between Bend and Idaho, you can claim ORH 7 if you're up for it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 21, 2022, 06:37:13 AM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on September 21, 2022, 05:01:06 AM
What I see after removing the nested quotes:
Quote from: Bickendan on September 18, 2022, 09:14:44 PM
[empty post]

What should have been:
Quote from: Bickendan on September 18, 2022, 09:14:44 PM
Quote from: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 08:53:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 07:50:34 PM
Quote from: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 07:14:58 PM
In California, have never driven on CA-7. Not a single mile. That is, the modern day CA-7 from 1990. The original CA-7 that is today represented by I-405, CA-14, US-395? Never would have driven on it while signed, but have been on some or all of those routes.

CA-3 would be the lowest route number I've never clinched. Been on some segments on it here and there, including the implied concurrency with CA-299. (Although I believe both routes are signed here). When it comes to even-numbered routes, CA-4. Only segment I've been is the freeway alignment between I-5 and CA-99. I have driven on CA-89 from the CA-4 junction to the CA-88 junction, which historically was a concurrency with 89 (and also extended to Nevada via 88 concurrency). Strangely, though, there are still CA-4 shields on this stretch of 89. Not "TO" banners, just straight up CA-4 shields. Not sure why, because it hasn't been concurrent since 1964.
You haven't been on a route 7 anywhere?
I don't think so, no. When I visited New England, I paralleled US-7 in places but never drove on it. Never drove on either OR-7 or WA-7. Alaska has AK-7 but also avoided it (except for maybe a very short portion when I visited Juneau a long time ago). States beyond that, not ringing a bell.
If you've done any portion of US 20 between Bend and Idaho, you can claim ORH 7 if you're up for it.
That's unsigned though, right?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Quillz on September 21, 2022, 08:06:24 AM
The only portions of US-20 I've driven on are between Newport, OR and the I-5 junction. Then east of Yellowstone into South Dakota or so. So I haven't done the hidden/unsigned OR-7.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on September 21, 2022, 03:00:39 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 21, 2022, 06:37:13 AM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on September 21, 2022, 05:01:06 AM
What I see after removing the nested quotes:
Quote from: Bickendan on September 18, 2022, 09:14:44 PM
[empty post]

What should have been:
Quote from: Bickendan on September 18, 2022, 09:14:44 PM
Quote from: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 08:53:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 18, 2022, 07:50:34 PM
Quote from: Quillz on September 18, 2022, 07:14:58 PM
In California, have never driven on CA-7. Not a single mile. That is, the modern day CA-7 from 1990. The original CA-7 that is today represented by I-405, CA-14, US-395? Never would have driven on it while signed, but have been on some or all of those routes.

CA-3 would be the lowest route number I've never clinched. Been on some segments on it here and there, including the implied concurrency with CA-299. (Although I believe both routes are signed here). When it comes to even-numbered routes, CA-4. Only segment I've been is the freeway alignment between I-5 and CA-99. I have driven on CA-89 from the CA-4 junction to the CA-88 junction, which historically was a concurrency with 89 (and also extended to Nevada via 88 concurrency). Strangely, though, there are still CA-4 shields on this stretch of 89. Not "TO" banners, just straight up CA-4 shields. Not sure why, because it hasn't been concurrent since 1964.
You haven't been on a route 7 anywhere?
I don't think so, no. When I visited New England, I paralleled US-7 in places but never drove on it. Never drove on either OR-7 or WA-7. Alaska has AK-7 but also avoided it (except for maybe a very short portion when I visited Juneau a long time ago). States beyond that, not ringing a bell.
If you've done any portion of US 20 between Bend and Idaho, you can claim ORH 7 if you're up for it.
That's unsigned though, right?
The entire ORH system is unsigned. Up to the individual tracking whether to count them or not, but looks like Quillz hasn't been on the relevant section anyway :(
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on September 21, 2022, 03:01:26 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on September 21, 2022, 05:01:06 AM
What I see after removing the nested quotes:
Quote from: Bickendan on September 18, 2022, 09:14:44 PM
[empty post]
Ugh, what I get for not scrolling all the way down in the quick reply box :pan:

Edit: I suppose this post should be merged into the above x.x
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 22, 2022, 08:12:57 PM
One moves up...























































oscar621
formulanone577
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94338
hbelkins334
corco333
Hot Rod Hootenanny318
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
dlsterner232
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
NWI_Irish96147
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 26, 2022, 07:40:41 AM
I got IL 147 yesterday, so now my lowest untraveled number is 174. Have a family trip to Pittsburgh planned in early November and going to try to convince the fam to detour to OH 174 west of Cleveland on the way home.

Sorry, no extra room in the car for plain or csw to join me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 27, 2022, 12:48:59 AM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on September 26, 2022, 07:40:41 AM
I got IL 147 yesterday, so now my lowest untraveled number is 174. Have a family trip to Pittsburgh planned in early November and going to try to convince the fam to detour to OH 174 west of Cleveland on the way home.


It's east, sir. (extreme) Eastside of Cleveland, not west.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 27, 2022, 07:10:33 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 27, 2022, 12:48:59 AM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on September 26, 2022, 07:40:41 AM
I got IL 147 yesterday, so now my lowest untraveled number is 174. Have a family trip to Pittsburgh planned in early November and going to try to convince the fam to detour to OH 174 west of Cleveland on the way home.


It's east, sir. (extreme) Eastside of Cleveland, not west.

Yeah, I knew that. No idea why I typed west.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 28, 2022, 12:14:11 PM
Visited Sharon, Pa. yesterday and picked up PA 318. Now I'm up to 339, which will require a trip to SE Ohio. I'll get that before I head off to the Okla. City Meet in 3 weeks.
But this gets me to #10 on the list, which tops my previous high of #11 from the original list, back 3 years ago.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on September 28, 2022, 06:25:51 PM
Speaking of the Oklahoma City meet, anyone who attends that will be in prime position to pick up a 102 on the way into or out of town if they need one.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 28, 2022, 08:35:28 PM
Middlin' movements.

























































oscar621
formulanone577
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
Hot Rod Hootenanny339
cl94338
hbelkins334
corco333
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
dlsterner232
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
plain174
csw174
NWI_Irish96174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
CoreySamson9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on October 10, 2022, 12:52:47 AM
I went out of my way today to get a section of OK-9, which means my lowest number is now 14, which shouldn't be to hard to get in the next couple months.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 18, 2022, 09:01:25 AM
I was going to wait, but I got impatient.

























































oscar621
formulanone577
Rothman451
Mapmikey429
74/171FAN427
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
Hot Rod Hootenanny339
cl94338
hbelkins334
corco333
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
dlsterner232
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
plain174
csw174
NWI_Irish96174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
jlam68
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
CoreySamson14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kirbykart on October 18, 2022, 09:27:31 AM
Do county routes count? My number would be higher if they do.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on October 18, 2022, 10:40:38 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 18, 2022, 09:27:31 AM
Do county routes count? My number would be higher if they do.

That's your decision to make.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 18, 2022, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 18, 2022, 10:40:38 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 18, 2022, 09:27:31 AM
Do county routes count? My number would be higher if they do.

That's your decision to make.
Yep, it is your decision. 

For me and my house, however, I do not count them, for counting them is for sissies.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 20, 2022, 11:05:15 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 18, 2022, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 18, 2022, 10:40:38 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 18, 2022, 09:27:31 AM
Do county routes count? My number would be higher if they do.

That's your decision to make.
Yep, it is your decision. 

For me and my house, however, I do not count them, for counting them is for sissies.

If one wants to include County/township/parish numbered routes, then that list can only contain said routes. No mixtures with state/fed/Interstates.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 20, 2022, 11:13:14 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 20, 2022, 11:05:15 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 18, 2022, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 18, 2022, 10:40:38 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 18, 2022, 09:27:31 AM
Do county routes count? My number would be higher if they do.

That's your decision to make.
Yep, it is your decision. 

For me and my house, however, I do not count them, for counting them is for sissies.

If one wants to include County/township/parish numbered routes, then that list can only contain said routes. No mixtures with state/fed/Interstates.
That's a new one.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on October 21, 2022, 05:44:46 PM
I have officially been on NM 68, so my number rises to 97. This is where it will stay until I either discover a route I previously overlooked or until I turn 17.

NM 68
I-69
I-70
CO 71
US 72
MN 73
AL 74
UT 75
I-76
US 77
US 78
US 79
I-80
US 81
US 82
US 83
I-84
US 85
CO 86
US 87
CO 88
US 89
I-90
US 91
AZ 92
CO 93
I-94
CO 95
CO 96
No 97
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on October 23, 2022, 03:37:52 PM
I should be up to 432 now.  I clinched PA/NY/PA 426, PA 427, PA 428, and PA/NY 430 over the weekend.

My non-independent section number should be 429 (only 429 is NY 429 on its concurrency with NY 31), but that is for another thread.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 24, 2022, 08:07:56 AM
Those PA routes only go so far... :D

For some reason, I preferred these updates to previous ones...


























































oscar621
formulanone577
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
Hot Rod Hootenanny339
cl94338
hbelkins334
corco333
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
dlsterner232
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
plain174
csw174
NWI_Irish96174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
CoreySamson14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kirbykart on October 24, 2022, 08:14:56 AM
I won't count county routes, because, well, why would I?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on October 24, 2022, 08:17:28 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 24, 2022, 08:14:56 AM
I won't count county routes, because, well, why would I?

I don't count them either. I've been on some of New Jersey's county routes like 539 and 528, but I won't count it unless it's a state route. It makes it harder that way.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on October 24, 2022, 08:18:42 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 24, 2022, 08:14:56 AM
I won't count county routes, because, well, why would I?

You might not need to now, but at some point it might depend on how long you want to be stuck on a lower number.  ;-)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 24, 2022, 09:05:03 AM
Quote from: webny99 on October 24, 2022, 08:18:42 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 24, 2022, 08:14:56 AM
I won't count county routes, because, well, why would I?

You might not need to now, but at some point it might depend on how long you want to be stuck on a lower number.  ;-)
Only the strong resist the urge.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on October 24, 2022, 09:17:54 AM
There aren't any numbered county highways near me that would help me, so I don't really have to make that decision.

Even then, I think I'm going to stick with routes listed in TravelMapping so I don't have to maintain another list.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on October 24, 2022, 11:29:11 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 24, 2022, 08:07:56 AM
Those PA routes only go so far... :D

It looks like my best hope for 432 is in KY.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 24, 2022, 11:38:57 AM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on October 24, 2022, 11:29:11 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 24, 2022, 08:07:56 AM
Those PA routes only go so far... :D

It looks like my best hope for 432 is in KY.
Like I said much earlier in this thread, this game gets pretty dull in the upper numbers as fewer and fewer states have routes with high numbers.  You end up having to spend way too much time in KY, TX or VA to get up to Oscarland.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on October 24, 2022, 01:41:22 PM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 24, 2022, 08:14:56 AM
I won't count county routes, because, well, why would I?

Why would you not?

It's all personal preference.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on October 24, 2022, 01:48:49 PM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on October 24, 2022, 09:17:54 AM
There aren't any numbered county highways near me that would help me, so I don't really have to make that decision.

Even then, I think I'm going to stick with routes listed in TravelMapping so I don't have to maintain another list.

This is probably going to get an even bigger eye roll from Rothman, but I've filled in with two or three select county routes without maintaining a full list of county routes I've been on. I would ultimately like to fill them in with routes in TM and probably will eventually.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on October 24, 2022, 05:22:03 PM
My rationale with county routes is that they have to be signed with a shield in order for them to be valid. They can't just be signed on street blades or LGSs, or be labeled as such on Google Maps. In fact, I grabbed my number 2 with a county route with this rationale...

(https://imgur.com/q74hMgd.jpg)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on October 24, 2022, 06:24:49 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on October 24, 2022, 05:22:03 PM
My rationale with county routes is that they have to be signed with a shield in order for them to be valid. They can't just be signed on street blades or LGSs, or be labeled as such on Google Maps.

The three or four county routes in my list are signed with blue pentagons or other conventional route markers. I insisted on that in part because I kept coming across "county routes" I wasn't sure officially existed. No such issue with unsigned Interstates like I-296 or I-345, or unsigned state routes whose official status is easily confirmed.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 24, 2022, 09:10:41 PM
*wags finger*
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on October 25, 2022, 10:45:45 AM
*shurg*  It's a route.  With a number.  And even a sign.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on October 27, 2022, 01:07:48 PM
Quote from: webny99 on October 24, 2022, 08:18:42 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 24, 2022, 08:14:56 AM
I won't count county routes, because, well, why would I?

You might not need to now, but at some point it might depend on how long you want to be stuck on a lower number.  ;-)

Pro Tip:
More routes traveled, and less posts to AAroads, will make you a better roadgeek.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on October 30, 2022, 07:40:34 PM
This weekend, I increased my lowest untraveled number to 643. While traveling new I-66 express lanes, I saw signs for SR 621 and SR 622 in Prince William County, the next untraveled numbers on my list. I went back out there to do some shopping and snag those routes. Some more shopping took me into southeastern Fairfax County, where I spotted a cluster of several more untraveled routes. There's also an SR 643 in a different part of the county, maybe later.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 31, 2022, 08:41:18 AM
Just can't catch up to an old Virginian...


























































oscar643
formulanone577
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
Hot Rod Hootenanny339
cl94338
hbelkins334
corco333
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
dlsterner232
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
plain174
csw174
NWI_Irish96174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
CoreySamson14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on November 04, 2022, 11:50:11 AM
Drove on Ohio 339 yesterday, so I'm now up to 346.
Won't affect the standings (for the time being), but gives me a little breathing room in case Josh, H.B, & Corco decide to get back into the game.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: algorerhythms on November 05, 2022, 08:50:32 PM
My first thought on reading the thread title was, "well, I haven't been on the M-1 in England, so I guess 1?", but that would be much tougher if you had to be on every route 1 for it to count...

So... the first route I can think of having been on for each number...
1: US 1 (in NJ, PA, and who knows where else)
2: MD 2
3: OK 3
4: MD 4
5: NY 5
6: US 6 (in PA)
7: ON 7
8: ON 8
9: US 9 (in NJ)
10: US 10 (in WI)
11: US 11 (in PA)
12: US 12 (in IL, WI)
13: US 13 (in MD, VA)
14: US 14 (in IL, WI)
15: US 15 (in PA)
16: IL 16 (this one took me a while to remember... I was on it briefly while returning from seeing the solar eclipse in 2017)
17: US 17 (in VA)
18: PA 18
19: US 19 (in PA, WV)
20: US 20 (in IL)
21: ON 21
22: US 22 (in PA)
23: US 23 (in OH)
24: I-24 (in TN)
25: US 25 (in KY)
26: IL 26
27: US 27 (in KY)
28: IN 28
29: US 29 (in MD)
30: US 30 (in PA)
31: PA 31
32: WI 32, if being a pedestrian counts
33: US 33 (in OH)
34: US 34 (in IL)
35: US 35 (in OH)
36: MD 36
37: I got bored at this point
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on November 05, 2022, 09:36:05 PM
Quote from: algorerhythms on November 05, 2022, 08:50:32 PM
37: I got bored at this point

S. 4th Street in Moore, or I-44 between Newcastle and OKC? Either would get you a piece of OK-37.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: J N Winkler on November 05, 2022, 11:04:49 PM
Giving this a whirl:

1:  US 1 (many states)
2:  K-2
3:  US 3 (New Hampshire)
4:  K-4
5:  I-5
6:  US 6 (many states)
7:  K-7
8:  US 8 (Minnesota, Wisconsin)
9:  K-9
10:  K-10
11:  US 11 (New York, Virginia)
12:  US 12 (Washington, Minnesota)
13:  US 13 (Virginia, Maryland)
14:  K-14
15:  K-15
16:  K-16
17:  I-17
18:  K-18
19:  I-19
20:  US 20 (many states)
21:  Colorado SH 21
22:  Alberta Hwy. 22
23:  TH 23 (Minnesota)
24:  US 24 (many states)
25:  I-25
26:  US 26 (many states)
27:  K-27
28:  STH 28 (Wisconsin)
29:  I-29
30:  I-30
31:  US 31W (Kentucky)
32:  K-32
33:  SR 33 (California)
34:  US 34 (Nebraska, Colorado)
35:  I-35
36:  US 36 (Kansas, Missouri)
37:  I-37
38:  NM 38
39:  SR 39 (Oregon)
40:  US 40 (many states)
41:  I-41
42:  K-42
43:  I-43
44:  I-44
45:  I-45
46:  US 46 (New Jersey) (only if the segment over the George Washington Bridge counts)
47:  K-47
48:  SR 48 (Virginia)
49:  I-49
50:  US 50
51:  US 51 (Illinois)
52:  US 52 (Minnesota)
53:  K-53
54:  US 54 (many states)
55:  I-55
56:  US 56 (many states)
57:  K-57
58:  US 58
59:  US 59
60:  US 60 (many states)
61:  K-61
62:  US 62 (many states)
63:  US 63 (Missouri)
64:  US 64 (many states)
65:  US 65 (Minnesota)
66:  SR 66 (former US 66) (many states)
67:  US 67 (many states)
68:  I-68
69:  US 69 (many states)
70:  I-70
71:  I-71
72:  I-72
73:  US 73
74:  I-74
75:  I-75
76:  I-76
77:  I-77
78:  SR 78 (Oregon)
79:  I-79
80:  I-80
81:  I-81
82:  I-82
83:  US 83
84:  I-84
85:  I-85
86:  SR 86 (Arizona)
87:  US 87 (New Mexico)
88:  I-88
89:  US 89 (Utah)
90:  US 90 (Texas)
91:  I-91
92:  SR 92 (Nebraska)
93:  US 93 (Nevada, Idaho)
94:  I-94
95:  US 95 (Idaho)
96:  K-96
97:  US 97 (Oregon, California)
98:  US 98 (Alabama)
99:  I-99
100:  TH 100 (Minnesota)
101:  US 101 (California, Oregon, Washington)

The lowest therefore appears to be 102.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: algorerhythms on November 06, 2022, 01:26:03 AM
Ah, I had forgotten about OK-37...
So...
37: OK-37
38: MD-38
39: MD-39
40: US 40
41: US 41 (in IL)
42: MD 42
43: I-43
44: I-44
45: I-45
46: WV-46
47: MD-47
48: If former routes that were numbered as such at least one of the times you were on them count, then US-48 (MD)
49: MD-49
50: US-50 (WV)
51: MD-51
52: US-52 (IL)
53: MD-53
54: MD-54
55: MD-55
56: MD-56
57: I-57
58: OK-58
59: US-59 (OK)
60: US-60 (OK)
61: MD-61
62: ON-62
63: MD-63
64: I-64
65: I-65
66: OK-66
67: US-67 (IL)
68: I-68
69: ON-69
70: I-70
71: US-71 (AR) (checking Google Maps... when did they finish the Bella Vista bypass? That wasn't done when I was there, and I wasn't there that long ago.)
72: I-72
73: ??? This might be the winner. In any event, I just realized I started this list at 1:45 and now it's 1:25, so I think it's time to go to bed...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: therocket on November 06, 2022, 02:05:09 AM
1: CA-1
2: CA-2
3: DR (Dominican Republic)-3
4: I-4
5: I-5
6: National Freeway 6 (Taiwan)
7: MO-7 (via concurrency with I-49)
8: I-8
9: CA-9
10: I-10
11: I-11
12: UT-12
13: MO-13 (via concurrency with US-60)
14: Provincial Highway 14 (Taiwan)
15: I-15
16: Provincial Highway 16 (Taiwan)
17: CA-17
18: CA-18
19: CA-19
20: Québec Autoroute 20
21: California County Route S21
22: CA-22
23: CA-23
24: none
That would make the lowest numbered route I haven't been on 24.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on November 06, 2022, 04:12:49 AM
A major Travel Mapping team member, in Europe, claims a lowest untraveled route number of 767 (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=397.msg29680#msg29680). Another one, in the U.S., is one western Kentucky route from leapfrogging me (https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=mapcat&).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on November 06, 2022, 09:50:08 AM
Quote from: algorerhythms on November 06, 2022, 01:26:03 AM
48: If former routes that were numbered as such at least one of the times you were on them count, then US-48 (MD)

Rothman will call you a sissy, but I used to do that to count NM 47 and UT 181. A valid play but it felt like enough of an asterisk that I made more effort to find and travel existing examples of those routes than normal.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on November 06, 2022, 12:34:06 PM
Quote from: US 89 on November 06, 2022, 09:50:08 AM
Quote from: algorerhythms on November 06, 2022, 01:26:03 AM
48: If former routes that were numbered as such at least one of the times you were on them count, then US-48 (MD)

Rothman will call you a sissy, but

Rothman will call you a sissy if you eat pancakes with the fork in the wrong hand. It's just the price of admission. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: algorerhythms on November 06, 2022, 01:13:24 PM
Yeah, I'm not worried about what Rothman thinks.

After retracing my routes from when I completed the counties of Illinois, it does seem I used IL-73 while getting Carroll and Whiteside, so...

73: IL-73
74: I-74
75: I-75
76: Peace, Love, and the Pennsylvania Turnpike
77: I-77
78: I-78
79: I-79
80: I-80
81: I-81
82: US-82 (TX)
83: I-83
84: I-84 (PA)
85: ON-85 (which is a terrible road to drive on and I hate it, for the record. Okay, I don't hate it as much as the 401, but nonetheless)
86: I-86
87: I-87
88: I-88 (IL)
89: ON-89
90: I-90
91: ???
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on November 07, 2022, 10:28:02 AM
Quote from: J N Winkler on November 05, 2022, 11:04:49 PM
46:  US 46 (New Jersey) (only if the segment over the George Washington Bridge counts)

It is still unknown if Rothman will call you a sissy for counting this.

Did you eat at the Olive Garden at 47th & 7th?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 07, 2022, 10:33:55 AM
Quote from: kphoger on November 07, 2022, 10:28:02 AM
Quote from: J N Winkler on November 05, 2022, 11:04:49 PM
46:  US 46 (New Jersey) (only if the segment over the George Washington Bridge counts)

It is still unknown if Rothman will call you a sissy for counting this.

Did you eat at the Olive Garden at 47th & 7th?
US 46 ends on the GWB, so that is non-sissy work.

Olive Garden is for people who lack taste buds and refinement.

Counting routes that no longer exist I could go either way on.

I'll be updating everything when I get back home from this weekend visit to family.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: algorerhythms on November 07, 2022, 11:52:42 AM
I keep finding routes from when I completed Illinois' counties that are keeping me going here...

91: IL-91
92: PA-92
93: IL-93
94: I-94
95: I-95
96: I-96
97: IL-97
98: NY-98
99: I-99
100: IL-100
101: ON-101
102: ON-102
103: IL-103
104: NY-104
105: IN-105
106: IL-106
107: IL-107
108: MD-108
109: ???
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on November 07, 2022, 07:59:06 PM
I drove on a bit of OH 174 today, so my lowest is now all the way up to . . . 175.

Trip to Milwaukee is in order.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on November 07, 2022, 09:10:01 PM
I still can't believe I don't have 26.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 07, 2022, 10:11:25 PM
Quote from: algorerhythms on November 07, 2022, 11:52:42 AM
I keep finding routes from when I completed Illinois' counties that are keeping me going here...

91: IL-91
92: PA-92
93: IL-93
94: I-94
95: I-95
96: I-96
97: IL-97
98: NY-98
99: I-99
100: IL-100
101: ON-101
102: ON-102
103: IL-103
104: NY-104
105: IN-105
106: IL-106
107: IL-107
108: MD-108
109: ???
Make up your mind.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 07, 2022, 10:33:37 PM
We'll wait on algorerhythms to finalize his list.  I believe I captured the other updates.
























































oscar643
formulanone577
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
Hot Rod Hootenanny346
cl94338
hbelkins334
corco333
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
dlsterner232
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
Bickendan88
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
CoreySamson14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on November 07, 2022, 11:49:57 PM
Careful scrutiny of my travels in Arkansas and Colorado shows small overlaps with AR and CO 88, putting me at 109.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on November 08, 2022, 08:11:15 PM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on November 07, 2022, 07:59:06 PM
I drove on a bit of OH 174 today, so my lowest is now all the way up to . . . 175.

Trip to Milwaukee is in order.

How could you pick up 174, but not 175, while on the eastside of Cleveland?!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on November 08, 2022, 08:19:48 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on November 08, 2022, 08:11:15 PM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on November 07, 2022, 07:59:06 PM
I drove on a bit of OH 174 today, so my lowest is now all the way up to . . . 175.

Trip to Milwaukee is in order.

How could you pick up 174, but not 175, while on the eastside of Cleveland?!

Great catch.  You could use it even as an excuse to view the rail line in the middle of OH 87.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on November 08, 2022, 08:27:15 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on November 08, 2022, 08:11:15 PM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on November 07, 2022, 07:59:06 PM
I drove on a bit of OH 174 today, so my lowest is now all the way up to . . . 175.

Trip to Milwaukee is in order.

How could you pick up 174, but not 175, while on the eastside of Cleveland?!

So I had my family with me and there are limits to how much I can add to the fastest route. Plus I knew that I had 175 in Milwaukee which isn't too far away.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on November 13, 2022, 11:12:09 PM
I drove NV 338 today, so my lowest is now 348. That will be a hard one to get from my current location and I'm kicking myself for not driving PA 348 when I lived out that way.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 14, 2022, 06:27:38 PM
What happened to algorerhythms?


























































oscar643
formulanone577
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94348
Hot Rod Hootenanny346
hbelkins334
corco333
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
dlsterner232
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
CoreySamson14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on November 14, 2022, 06:28:48 PM
Quote from: Rothman on November 14, 2022, 06:27:38 PM
What happened to algorerhythms?

Is him forgetting to finish his list an inconvenient truth?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on November 24, 2022, 11:53:31 PM
A few days ago I picked up both PA 232 and PA 248 ... so my lowest number untraveled is now 266.

And it will probably stay that way for a while.  The nearest 266 that I'm aware of is in Ohio, about 350 miles away.  It's a shame that the proposed I-266 in the Washington DC area never came to be.

Plus, the next number in line - 269 - is about 250 miles away.

Must ... resist ... temptation ... to ... look ... for ... Virginia ... secondaries ...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on November 25, 2022, 09:23:10 AM
I picked up FM 577 this week, so now I'm on...578

This is going to take a while.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on November 25, 2022, 09:24:00 AM
You can get NY 266 if you attend roadwaywiz's Buffalo meet next year.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on November 25, 2022, 10:48:10 AM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on November 25, 2022, 09:24:00 AM
You can get NY 266 if you attend roadwaywiz's Buffalo meet next year.

Will consider, thanks!  It is a bit further for me (400 miles) versus the Ohio 266 (350 miles), but there are a number of roads in that area that are unclinched for my Travel Mapping log.

Plus I can always visit scenic Orleans County while I am up there.  I've heard that it's highly recommended.

Edited to add:
Also, 269 (which is another problematic number for me) runs along the Orleans County line.  Convenient!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: webny99 on November 25, 2022, 03:04:44 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on November 25, 2022, 10:48:10 AM
Plus I can always visit scenic Orleans County while I am up there.  I've heard that it's highly recommended.

Edited to add:
Also, 269 (which is another problematic number for me) runs along the Orleans County line.  Convenient!

Make sure to take 269 SB to avoid entering Orleans County.  ;-)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on November 28, 2022, 04:59:39 PM
Still haven't gotten a 379, but did get my second 378!  :) (Clinched NM378 this weekend)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 28, 2022, 09:46:33 PM
A belated update...


























































oscar643
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94348
Hot Rod Hootenanny346
hbelkins334
corco333
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
CoreySamson14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hunty2022 on November 29, 2022, 10:49:34 AM
I've been on every route number from 1-19.
I have obviously been on VA-20.
I've been on US-21 and VA-22.

Though, I have not been on any routes numbered 23.
So, 23 is my answer.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 05, 2022, 08:53:35 PM
Dinky update.

























































oscar643
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94348
Hot Rod Hootenanny346
hbelkins334
corco333
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
Hunty202223
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
CoreySamson14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: skquinn on December 06, 2022, 06:07:11 AM
Quote from: skquinn on December 12, 2020, 10:57:50 PM
I've been on NASA Road 1, but no route numbered 2 I know of. After I find a route numbered 2, it will jump to 4 (Texas 3), then 7 (Spur 5, Texas 6), then at least 11 (Beltway 8, Vermont/New Hampshire 9, I-10).

In case this helps anyone else: there is no Texas Highway 2, but I just found out there's an FM 2 not too far from the Texas Renaissance Festival grounds in Grimes County.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on December 06, 2022, 06:25:41 AM
Quote from: skquinn on December 06, 2022, 06:07:11 AM
Quote from: skquinn on December 12, 2020, 10:57:50 PM
I've been on NASA Road 1, but no route numbered 2 I know of. After I find a route numbered 2, it will jump to 4 (Texas 3), then 7 (Spur 5, Texas 6), then at least 11 (Beltway 8, Vermont/New Hampshire 9, I-10).

In case this helps anyone else: there is no Texas Highway 2, but I just found out there's an FM 2 not too far from the Texas Renaissance Festival grounds in Grimes County.

Waco has a Loop 2, but that's further away.

Texas makes you go quite a distance early on in this game. I don't feel like they start to bunch up numbers until you hit the Farm to Market Roads in the 500s.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on December 06, 2022, 06:47:34 AM
Quote from: formulanone on December 06, 2022, 06:25:41 AM
Quote from: skquinn on December 06, 2022, 06:07:11 AM
Quote from: skquinn on December 12, 2020, 10:57:50 PM
I've been on NASA Road 1, but no route numbered 2 I know of. After I find a route numbered 2, it will jump to 4 (Texas 3), then 7 (Spur 5, Texas 6), then at least 11 (Beltway 8, Vermont/New Hampshire 9, I-10).

In case this helps anyone else: there is no Texas Highway 2, but I just found out there's an FM 2 not too far from the Texas Renaissance Festival grounds in Grimes County.

Waco has a Loop 2, but that's further away.

Texas makes you go quite a distance early on in this game. I don't feel like they start to bunch up numbers until you hit the Farm to Market Roads in the 500s.

Indiana is a great place to live for this game until you get to 75.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on December 07, 2022, 01:57:39 AM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on December 06, 2022, 06:47:34 AM
Quote from: formulanone on December 06, 2022, 06:25:41 AM
Quote from: skquinn on December 06, 2022, 06:07:11 AM
Quote from: skquinn on December 12, 2020, 10:57:50 PM
I've been on NASA Road 1, but no route numbered 2 I know of. After I find a route numbered 2, it will jump to 4 (Texas 3), then 7 (Spur 5, Texas 6), then at least 11 (Beltway 8, Vermont/New Hampshire 9, I-10).

In case this helps anyone else: there is no Texas Highway 2, but I just found out there's an FM 2 not too far from the Texas Renaissance Festival grounds in Grimes County.

Waco has a Loop 2, but that's further away.

Texas makes you go quite a distance early on in this game. I don't feel like they start to bunch up numbers until you hit the Farm to Market Roads in the 500s.

Indiana is a great place to live for this game until you get to 75.
Then you move to a neighboring state.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: algorerhythms on December 07, 2022, 10:56:02 AM
Scraping the bottom of the barrel on 109...

109: Wellington County (ON) Road 109
110: IL-110
111: ???
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 07, 2022, 11:15:49 AM
Quote from: algorerhythms on December 07, 2022, 10:56:02 AM
Scraping the bottom of the barrel on 109...

109: Wellington County (ON) Road 109
110: IL-110
111: ???
So, 111 is your number?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on December 07, 2022, 12:32:55 PM
Quote from: algorerhythms on December 07, 2022, 10:56:02 AM
110: IL-110

Ick.  I hope that, when I get up to 110, I don't have to scrape the bottom of the barrel to dig up the CKC.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on December 07, 2022, 12:44:43 PM
Quote from: kphoger on December 07, 2022, 12:32:55 PM
Quote from: algorerhythms on December 07, 2022, 10:56:02 AM
110: IL-110

Ick.  I hope that, when I get up to 110, I don't have to scrape the bottom of the barrel to dig up the CKC.

If you ever come to my area, and we decide to meet, you're very likely to get MA 110. You can also get MA 113 and MA 114 while you're there, and depending on how you get there, MA/NH 111.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on December 07, 2022, 12:54:30 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 07, 2022, 12:44:43 PM
If you ever come to my area, and we decide to meet, you're very likely to get MA 110. You can also get MA 113 and MA 114 while you're there, and depending on how you get there, MA/NH 111.

I haven't looked ahead to see if I've been on a 110 that's not the CKC.

But I know I've been on IL-111 a few times.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on December 07, 2022, 01:08:55 PM
Quote from: kphoger on December 07, 2022, 12:54:30 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 07, 2022, 12:44:43 PM
If you ever come to my area, and we decide to meet, you're very likely to get MA 110. You can also get MA 113 and MA 114 while you're there, and depending on how you get there, MA/NH 111.

I haven't looked ahead to see if I've been on a 110 that's not the CKC.

But I know I've been on IL-111 a few times.

Don't know how often you get back to the Chicago area but there's a IN 110 not too far away.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on December 07, 2022, 02:00:49 PM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on December 07, 2022, 01:08:55 PM
Don't know how often you get back to the Chicago area but there's a IN 110 not too far away.

Well, it's a moot point.  Even if I nab K-26 on my next trip to Branson, I still haven't identified any road I've been on with a number of 48.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on December 07, 2022, 02:08:30 PM
Quote from: kphoger on December 07, 2022, 02:00:49 PM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on December 07, 2022, 01:08:55 PM
Don't know how often you get back to the Chicago area but there's a IN 110 not too far away.

Well, it's a moot point.  Even if I nab K-26 on my next trip to Branson, I still haven't identified any road I've been on with a number of 48.

Next trip to Chicago: I-35 -> I-70 -> I-55 -> IL 48 -> I-57 -> IL 17 -> IL 114 -> IN 10 -> IN 110 and then backtrack to I-65.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: algorerhythms on December 07, 2022, 04:24:19 PM
Quote from: kphoger on December 07, 2022, 12:32:55 PM
Quote from: algorerhythms on December 07, 2022, 10:56:02 AM
110: IL-110

Ick.  I hope that, when I get up to 110, I don't have to scrape the bottom of the barrel to dig up the CKC.
Meh, was the first one I remembered. Apparently I've also been on VA-110 and OK-110 if that's not good enough for you.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 07, 2022, 06:41:36 PM
Okeydokey.

























































oscar643
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94348
Hot Rod Hootenanny346
hbelkins334
corco333
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
averageroadgeek37
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
Hunty202223
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
CoreySamson14
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on December 08, 2022, 12:52:49 PM
Just wanted to bump the first list just to give some comparison to where we started, to where we are now, after 3+ years.
Quote from: Rothman on June 09, 2019, 03:15:35 PM

oscar379
formulanone348
Mapmikey266
Duke87245
plain159
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
Rothman125
paulthemapguy112
amroad17107
Hot Rod Hootenanny106
Thing 342103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
SGwithADD102
skluth102
bassoon1986101
Flint197997
hobsini97
1995hoo96
csw82
BrianP53
cabiness4248
Jim48
Bickendan48
Eth47
dlsterer47
136
Buck8734
doorknob6029
ipeters6128
Evan_Th28
mapman107124
kphoger22
US 8921
jp the roadgeek19
CNGL-Leudimin18
kurumi18
dvferyance17
Roadgeekteen14
apeman3312
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
Roadgeekteen10
wxfree9
Takumi9
Ben1148
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Pink Jazz6
Skye5
mgk9205
Super Mateo4
Roadsguy4
SoCal Kid3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Hurricane Rex1
thspfc1

Also figured out that I could get up to 241 just with taking a decent day's drive around my area.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on December 08, 2022, 07:11:09 PM
Re: 110

There are also FIVE frickin Interstates with that number! I don't see people frequenting Biloxi, Pensacola, Baton Rouge, or El Paso super often but a trip to Los Angeles could nab you a 110!  I have the little SR-110's from Iowa, Wisconsin, and Indiana. If you ever wanted to swim in the Great Salt Lake at Antelope Island, and experience how absurdly easy it is to float in that lake, you could get a 110 that way, too.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on December 09, 2022, 09:40:47 AM
I've already gotten a 110 :sombrero:, but I'm still far from that. 27 is doable for me, I can cheat 28 as I have walked along a route with that number, but then there's 29.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on December 09, 2022, 01:40:21 PM
Oh, I've been on MO-110.  I just refuse to acknowledge it on principle.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on December 09, 2022, 02:09:56 PM
Quote from: kphoger on December 09, 2022, 01:40:21 PM
Oh, I've been on MO-110.  I just refuse to acknowledge it on principle.

As an Illinois resident, I wholeheartedly respect this principle.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hunty2022 on December 09, 2022, 02:17:23 PM
I'm pretty sure I've actually been on US 23. So, my number is rising all the way up to 38.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on December 12, 2022, 04:16:33 PM
Just grabbed TN 14, TN 15, and Caddo Parish Road 16 (signed (https://goo.gl/maps/L8oUsG3snrAZTCgr8)) yesterday, which pushes my number from 14 to 17. 17 looks relatively hard for me to get; the best option for getting it is probably FM 17.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hen3ry on December 14, 2022, 02:13:36 AM
Technically my answer is 36, but my 3 is extremely cheap.

US 1 and CA 1
CA 2
AL 3 (unsigned segment of US 31, for a short stretch while co-signed on I-65)
I-4 and CA 4
I-5
US 6
VA 7
I-8
VA-9
I-10
US 11   (Also I-11, but before it was signed as such)
I-12
US 13
CA 14
I-15
CA 16
I-17
CA 18
CA 19
I-20
US 21
CA 22
CA 23
I-24
I-25
I-26
CA 27
VA 28
US 29
CA 30 (before it was resigned as CA 210)
US 31
VA 32
US 33
CA 34
I-35
36 (gap)

Next gaps:  44, 48, 51, 53, 61, 62, 73, 92. 

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 15, 2022, 07:27:14 PM
Little down table movements.  Take time to really figure out where you stand to avoid frequent updates.


























































oscar643
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94348
Hot Rod Hootenanny346
hbelkins334
corco333
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
CoreySamson17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bwana39 on December 16, 2022, 10:09:46 PM
I have been on Route 0 and even 00.
I have been on Everything else up to 25. Many in multiples.

26 was the first outlier. I have crossed LA26 and MN26. But never driven on them. Ironically if you count as a baby, I traveled on TX-26 before it was cancelled and renumbered as US-259 in 1962. It was just 20 miles from where I grew up.

I have given up on the next one. I am through 56.




Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bm7 on December 17, 2022, 12:20:45 AM
After very briefly traveling on IA 1 earlier this year, my lowest is 8.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 18, 2022, 05:34:03 PM
Bm7...some interesting interpretations there of that handle...


























































oscar643
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94348
Hot Rod Hootenanny346
hbelkins334
corco333
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
CoreySamson17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on December 19, 2022, 07:22:39 PM
Quote from: bwana39 on December 16, 2022, 10:09:46 PM
Ironically if you count as a baby, I traveled on TX-26 before it was cancelled and renumbered as US-259 in 1962. It was just 20 miles from where I grew up.

I'm missing the irony...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on December 19, 2022, 08:47:48 PM
Quote from: kphoger on December 19, 2022, 07:22:39 PM
Quote from: bwana39 on December 16, 2022, 10:09:46 PM
Ironically if you count as a baby, I traveled on TX-26 before it was cancelled and renumbered as US-259 in 1962. It was just 20 miles from where I grew up.

I'm missing the irony...

It's irony as defined by the Alanis Morissette School Of Ironyâ„¢
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on December 26, 2022, 12:56:22 AM
My lowest untraveled route number has increased by two, from 643 to 645. Returning home on Christmas day from my sister's place in south central PA, I stumbled on (and clinched) PA 643. I already had Virginia SR 644 in the Springfield area of Fairfax County. But I don't know that I've been on any of the Virginia SR 645s.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on December 26, 2022, 09:35:37 PM
Quote from: oscar on December 26, 2022, 12:56:22 AM
My lowest untraveled route number has increased by two, from 643 to 645. Returning home on Christmas day from my sister's place in south central PA, I stumbled on (and clinched) PA 643. I already had Virginia SR 644 in the Springfield area of Fairfax County. But I don't know that I've been on any of the Virginia SR 645s.

What about the Puddledock Rd/River Rd corridor in Prince George County that basically goes from the Petersburg City Limits (north of VA 36) to the Hopewell City Limits near Atwater Park?

I think it is much less likely that you have clinched the PG SR 646 (Middle Rd-an important local road that will be more important in a couple months when the new elementary school opens), and definitely not the PG SR 647 (Takach Rd-which connects to the west end of the Branchester Lakes subdivision).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on December 26, 2022, 09:36:08 PM
↑ Why are you helping him? :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hunty2022 on December 26, 2022, 09:58:52 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on December 26, 2022, 09:35:37 PM
Quote from: oscar on December 26, 2022, 12:56:22 AM
My lowest untraveled route number has increased by two, from 643 to 645. Returning home on Christmas day from my sister's place in south central PA, I stumbled on (and clinched) PA 643. I already had Virginia SR 644 in the Springfield area of Fairfax County. But I don't know that I've been on any of the Virginia SR 645s.

What about the Puddledock Rd/River Rd corridor in Prince George County that basically goes from the Petersburg City Limits (north of VA 36) to the Hopewell City Limits near Atwater Park?

I think it is much less likely that you have clinched the PG SR 646 (Middle Rd-an important local road that will be more important in a couple months when the new elementary school opens), and definitely not the PG SR 647 (Takach Rd-which connects to the west end of the Branchester Lakes subdivision).

Maybe check out GR SR-645, it may be minor, but it may have been recently extended. It runs from US 33 to US 29.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on December 27, 2022, 09:10:01 AM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on December 26, 2022, 09:35:37 PM
Quote from: oscar on December 26, 2022, 12:56:22 AM
My lowest untraveled route number has increased by two, from 643 to 645. Returning home on Christmas day from my sister's place in south central PA, I stumbled on (and clinched) PA 643. I already had Virginia SR 644 in the Springfield area of Fairfax County. But I don't know that I've been on any of the Virginia SR 645s.

What about the Puddledock Rd/River Rd corridor in Prince George County that basically goes from the Petersburg City Limits (north of VA 36) to the Hopewell City Limits near Atwater Park?

I think it is much less likely that you have clinched the PG SR 646 (Middle Rd-an important local road that will be more important in a couple months when the new elementary school opens), and definitely not the PG SR 647 (Takach Rd-which connects to the west end of the Branchester Lakes subdivision).

I don't usually wander off the primary highway network in the Petersburg area, which is more than two hours away from me. Usually I'm passing through in a hurry to get somewhere else. Besides, there are SR 645s closer to home (like one in Chantilly) I can pick off when I feel like it.

I have 646-648 covered already, in KY, MD, and/or NV.

UPDATE: On my way to and from the local computer superstore, I snagged the SR 645 I mentioned above (Lees Corner Rd. in Chantilly), and an SR 651 (Guinea Rd. in Fairfax). I already had an SR 649 in Annandale, as well as routes 650 and 652-653 in KY, MD, and/or NV. So my lowest untraveled route number is now 654, where it will stay until 2023.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Crash_It on December 28, 2022, 01:06:44 AM
Haven't been on Illinois Route 5 yet but I have driven all or parts of IL1 (even the unmarked portion which I have a YouTube video on), IL2(need to refilm), IL3 (upcoming YouTube video) and IL4. What's interesting is all of these single digit routes (so far) travel some varying terrain from a topographical standpoint.


Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on December 28, 2022, 10:51:38 AM
Quote from: Crash_It on December 28, 2022, 01:06:44 AM
Haven't been on Illinois Route 5 yet but I have driven all or parts of IL1 (even the unmarked portion which I have a YouTube video on), IL2(need to refilm), IL3 (upcoming YouTube video) and IL4. What's interesting is all of these single digit routes (so far) travel some varying terrain from a topographical standpoint.

Have you been on MN-5 where it multiplexes with I-494 south of Minneapolis?  Or on IA-5, where it forms the southern bypass of Des Moines?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ketchup99 on December 28, 2022, 10:57:40 AM
I'm still missing 38 and 47, but I have PA 39, I-40, WV 41, PA 42, PA 43, PA 44, PA 45, US 46, PA 48, NC 49, US 50, PA 51, NY 52, PA 53, PA 54, VA 55, PA 56, and a bunch more, I think until the mid-70s. (Mostly just putting this for my own record-keeping, to make it easier for me once I hit 38 and 47.)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 28, 2022, 11:05:19 AM
Quote from: kphoger on December 28, 2022, 10:51:38 AM
Quote from: Crash_It on December 28, 2022, 01:06:44 AM
Haven't been on Illinois Route 5 yet but I have driven all or parts of IL1 (even the unmarked portion which I have a YouTube video on), IL2(need to refilm), IL3 (upcoming YouTube video) and IL4. What's interesting is all of these single digit routes (so far) travel some varying terrain from a topographical standpoint.

Have you been on MN-5 where it multiplexes with I-494 south of Minneapolis?  Or on IA-5, where it forms the southern bypass of Des Moines?
Right, this is about any numbered route, even the ones I'll poke fun at people for.

Waiting for people to make up their minds before updating.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: epzik8 on January 02, 2023, 08:17:43 AM
I have been on no highways numbered 21.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 02, 2023, 11:40:44 AM
Updated with those that I think were settled.
























































oscar654
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94348
Hot Rod Hootenanny346
hbelkins334
corco333
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
CoreySamson17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Fredddie on January 05, 2023, 11:48:19 PM
My lowest number is 48.  I've crossed a 48, but not actually driven on it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cockroachking on January 09, 2023, 02:01:26 AM
Currently, it is 126 for me. 131 and 148, my next two, do not appear to be on my radar anytime soon either.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on January 17, 2023, 06:19:39 PM
I drove on FM 17 yesterday, so that pushes up my number to... 18. The only one that I can feasibly get appears to be OK 18. After that, my next numbers are 23, 27, and 32.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 17, 2023, 07:09:32 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on January 17, 2023, 06:19:39 PM
I drove on FM 17 yesterday, so that pushes up my number to... 18. The only one that I can feasibly get appears to be OK 18. After that, my next numbers are 23, 27, and 32.

OK-18 isn't too far from you in Tulsa. Nor is OK-27. And you could pick up OK-32 if you went home via OKC and DFW sometime.

23 is probably going to be a stumbling block, unless you can take a day to head out to the TX/OK panhandles, or to Northwest Arkansas.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on January 17, 2023, 08:44:49 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on January 17, 2023, 07:09:32 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on January 17, 2023, 06:19:39 PM
I drove on FM 17 yesterday, so that pushes up my number to... 18. The only one that I can feasibly get appears to be OK 18. After that, my next numbers are 23, 27, and 32.

OK-18 isn't too far from you in Tulsa. Nor is OK-27. And you could pick up OK-32 if you went home via OKC and DFW sometime.

23 is probably going to be a stumbling block, unless you can take a day to head out to the TX/OK panhandles, or to Northwest Arkansas.
Yeah I'm kicking myself because I was just in Memphis last month where I could've gotten TN 23 (I was pressed on time though and elected to pick up TN 14 instead to fill that gap). When I go back there, I'll be sure to pick it up. Otherwise, FM 23 seems like the best option.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 21, 2023, 02:19:34 PM
I think I captured everyone.
























































oscar654
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
Duke87353
cl94348
Hot Rod Hootenanny346
hbelkins334
corco333
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
cockroachking126
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
CoreySamson18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Duke87 on January 21, 2023, 09:39:44 PM
Up to 398 as of today
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on January 21, 2023, 09:41:42 PM
Up to 358 as of Tuesday. Grabbed PA 348.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on January 22, 2023, 12:01:05 AM
Man, I got passed in the hierarchy and someone is close on my back. I better get traveling sometime soon.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 22, 2023, 12:15:53 AM
Quote from: CoreySamson on January 17, 2023, 08:44:49 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on January 17, 2023, 07:09:32 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on January 17, 2023, 06:19:39 PM
I drove on FM 17 yesterday, so that pushes up my number to... 18. The only one that I can feasibly get appears to be OK 18. After that, my next numbers are 23, 27, and 32.

OK-18 isn't too far from you in Tulsa. Nor is OK-27. And you could pick up OK-32 if you went home via OKC and DFW sometime.

23 is probably going to be a stumbling block, unless you can take a day to head out to the TX/OK panhandles, or to Northwest Arkansas.
Yeah I'm kicking myself because I was just in Memphis last month where I could've gotten TN 23 (I was pressed on time though and elected to pick up TN 14 instead to fill that gap). When I go back there, I'll be sure to pick it up. Otherwise, FM 23 seems like the best option.

Oh, hey, I just remembered you said you might be taking a trip to Kansas City soon. K-32 is probably a fairly easy get, then.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bwana39 on January 22, 2023, 10:04:01 AM
Quote from: CoreySamson on January 17, 2023, 06:19:39 PM
I drove on FM 17 yesterday, so that pushes up my number to... 18. The only one that I can feasibly get appears to be OK 18. After that, my next numbers are 23, 27, and 32.

LA-18 is the old river road along the west bank of the Mississippi from Gretna to Donaldsonville  (Between Baton Rouge and New Orleans). It could happen too.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on January 22, 2023, 09:14:40 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on January 22, 2023, 12:01:05 AM
Man, I got passed in the hierarchy and someone is close on my back. I better get traveling sometime soon.
I plan on passing you next week as well. :-P
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: US 89 on January 23, 2023, 12:21:38 AM
I was planning on bumping mine yesterday, but a combination of earlier-than-expected darkness, rain, and a planned playoff football watch party meant that mission had to be temporarily aborted. So I remain at 192.

Moral: don't count your clinches before they hatch.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on January 23, 2023, 04:33:22 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on January 22, 2023, 09:14:40 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on January 22, 2023, 12:01:05 AM
Man, I got passed in the hierarchy and someone is close on my back. I better get traveling sometime soon.
I plan on passing you next week as well. :-P

I was going to get 379 this past March when I had planned to drive to see my buddy in Vegas. Unfortunately, gas prices were so high then that I decided to fly instead.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 24, 2023, 09:26:13 PM
All you "I'll get it next week" people are just all talk.
























































oscar654
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
Duke87398
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
cl94358
Hot Rod Hootenanny346
hbelkins334
corco333
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
cockroachking126
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
CoreySamson18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on January 24, 2023, 10:38:32 PM
Quote from: Rothman on January 24, 2023, 09:26:13 PM
All you "I'll get it next week" people are just all talk.

I'll let the late great Riley B. King do my talking...


When I clinch, I'll tell you. If I don't clinch, I'll have nothing to say.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on January 25, 2023, 06:08:38 AM
QuoteAll you "I'll get it next week" people are just all talk.

I may get 432 eventually....not next week.   ;-)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 03, 2023, 11:26:27 AM
Quote from: Rothman on January 24, 2023, 09:26:13 PM
All you "I'll get it next week" people are just all talk.

Since Rothman has been waiting, with baited breath, for my update...
Now its 387.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 05, 2023, 12:24:42 PM
Corco is corcoing.  Needs to take a trip to DC.

























































oscar654
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
Duke87398
Hot Rod Hootenanny387
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
cl94358
corco355
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
cockroachking126
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
TBKS139
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
CoreySamson18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: corco on February 24, 2023, 01:27:54 PM
Finally drove MD 333 on Monday, which kicks me up to 355
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on March 01, 2023, 05:23:47 PM
Doesn't change my standing, but I did pick up segments of NH 21, 48, UP 39 and 62.

This will legitimize my claim for 48 for those who don't like counting internal numbers like ORH 48... To which I say goodluck finding these Indian routes signed in the wild!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 01, 2023, 11:07:27 PM
Huh.  Looks like I just edited the previous post.  Oopsie.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on March 01, 2023, 11:57:48 PM
My lowest of 109 hasn't changed so I'm good
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on March 07, 2023, 04:33:34 AM
Because the online maps don't agree on routing, because signage on the ground is non-existent, and because sourcing a detailed physical map here in Kolkata doesn't seem possible, I'm claiming WB 1 and 3.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on March 12, 2023, 08:41:46 PM
While some of us are focused on a new photo game, I'm not completely ignoring this game.

Earlier today, I lucked into a Virginia secondary route 654 near Staunton, which I took from I-81 southeast to SR 831 (Old White Hill Rd.). That moves my lowest untraveled route number up to 661.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TBKS1 on March 12, 2023, 09:16:18 PM
Damn I forgot this thread existed. I was off the forum for over a year but in May 2022 I was very briefly on MO 39 south of Shell Knob, just drove to the Arkansas state line and back on MO 86.

I think the lowest I haven't been on is 47 now that I got 39.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 13, 2023, 10:54:36 PM
In the words of the great, late Robin Williams: Oscar, Oscar, he's our man! If he can't do it, great!

























































oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
Duke87398
Hot Rod Hootenanny387
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
cl94358
corco355
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
cockroachking126
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
CoreySamson18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Poiponen13 on March 15, 2023, 03:40:18 PM
In Finland, I have never been on Highway 6, which runs thoughout eastern Finland. It is the lowest numbered route I haven't been on. In US, lowest numbered is US 1, because I have never been to US  :spin:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 27, 2023, 03:27:59 PM
Itty bitty update.  Thought Oscar would have one since I think he just returned from a trip.
























































oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
Duke87398
Hot Rod Hootenanny387
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
Konza378
cl94358
corco355
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96175
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
cockroachking126
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
CoreySamson18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on April 18, 2023, 03:04:16 AM
Wandered a little bit in the Pelican State on a recent trip east and am prepared to extend my list as follows:

378, 379:  Louisiana
380:  Interstate (IA)
381:  Tennessee
382, 383:  Louisiana
384:  Arkansas
385:  US
386:  New Mexico
387:  Arizona
388:  Tennessee
389:  Kentucky
390:  Illinois
391:  Arkansas
392:  New Mexico
393:  Kentucky
394:  Illinois
395:  Interstate (VA/DC)
396:  Tennessee
397:  Arkansas
398, 399:  Louisiana
400:  US
401:  Ontario
402:  New Mexico
403:  Ontario
404:  Maryland
405:  Florida
406:  Louisiana
407:  Florida
408:  Louisiana
409:  New Mexico
410:  Interstate (TX)
411, 412:  US
413, 414:  Louisiana
415:  Iowa
416:  Louisiana
417:  Florida
418:  New Mexico
419:  Pennsylvania
420:  Louisiana
421, 422:  US
423:  New Mexico

This pursuit will continue.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 18, 2023, 06:49:43 AM
Quote from: Konza on April 18, 2023, 03:04:16 AM
Wandered a little bit in the Pelican State on a recent trip east and am prepared to extend my list as follows:

378, 379:  Louisiana
380:  Interstate (IA)
381:  Tennessee
382, 383:  Louisiana
384:  Arkansas
385:  US
386:  New Mexico
387:  Arizona
388:  Tennessee
389:  Kentucky
390:  Illinois
391:  Arkansas
392:  New Mexico
393:  Kentucky
394:  Illinois
395:  Interstate (VA/DC)
396:  Tennessee
397:  Arkansas
398, 399:  Louisiana
400:  US
401:  Ontario
402:  New Mexico
403:  Ontario
404:  Maryland
405:  Florida
406:  Louisiana
407:  Florida
408:  Louisiana
409:  New Mexico
410:  Interstate (TX)
411, 412:  US
413, 414:  Louisiana
415:  Iowa
416:  Louisiana
417:  Florida
418:  New Mexico
419:  Pennsylvania
420:  Louisiana
421, 422:  US
423:  New Mexico

This pursuit will continue.
You're prepared to extend your list or you've actually extended your list? :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on April 18, 2023, 10:20:08 AM
Please consider said list extended.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on April 23, 2023, 04:28:50 PM
I got WI 175 and 181 today, so my lowest is now 182. I'm officially out of range of day trips now.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 23, 2023, 08:55:17 PM
NWI_Irish96, we know your pain.  Konza moves up into contention in this doomed pursuit.

























































oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Duke87398
Hot Rod Hootenanny387
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
cl94358
corco355
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
cockroachking126
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
CoreySamson18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on May 16, 2023, 10:14:25 PM
My number went up from 18 to 32 recently. My goal for this thread is to get to 100 by the time I graduate, and it looks like the only major stumbling block will be 41.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on May 27, 2023, 07:17:15 PM
I doubt I will clinch it for a while, but I may have just solved my 432 problem.  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_state_highways_in_Maryland_shorter_than_one_mile_(2%E2%80%93699)#MD_430)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Duke87 on May 27, 2023, 07:46:41 PM
Incidentally I am now up to 432 now after a clinch of VA 398 last month.

I won't count any routes that aren't signed or that aren't state-level or higher systems without an asterisk though, so I will not be seeking out unsigned MD 432. For that number I'll need to go to WA, WY, MT, or somewhere outside the US.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on May 27, 2023, 08:00:18 PM
I also found a 432 in KY near Bowling Green.

My main reason for not running back down to MD tomorrow to get MD 432 is that I still need to get PA 438 to cover my 438.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on May 27, 2023, 08:10:35 PM
Quote from: Duke87 on May 27, 2023, 07:46:41 PM
Incidentally I am now up to 432 now after a clinch of VA 398 last month.

I won't count any routes that aren't signed or that aren't state-level or higher systems without an asterisk though, so I will not be seeking out unsigned MD 432. For that number I'll need to go to WA, WY, MT, or somewhere outside the US.

Quote from: 74/171FAN on May 27, 2023, 08:00:18 PM
I also found a 432 in KY near Bowling Green.

My main reason for not running back down to MD tomorrow to get MD 432 is that I still need to get PA 438 to cover my 438.

Mississippi and Louisiana also have state-maintained 432s, and both are signed.   
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 28, 2023, 09:47:09 PM
Counting unsigned designations is still for sissies. :P :D



























































oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny387
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
cl94358
corco355
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
cockroachking126
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
Caps8194386
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
BlueOutback748
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
CoreySamson32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on May 29, 2023, 03:43:35 PM
I finally got NJ 48 today putting me up to 54. Though I plan to grab NY 54 this weekend.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on May 29, 2023, 04:35:29 PM
Quote from: BlueOutback7 on May 29, 2023, 03:43:35 PM
I finally got NJ 48 today putting me up to 54. Though I plan to grab NY 54 this weekend.

Then I won't update the list until you're done.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Dough4872 on May 30, 2023, 08:22:33 PM
Lowest number I haven't been on is 28
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: MATraveler128 on June 01, 2023, 04:50:17 PM
Quote from: Rothman on May 29, 2023, 04:35:29 PM
Quote from: BlueOutback7 on May 29, 2023, 03:43:35 PM
I finally got NJ 48 today putting me up to 54. Though I plan to grab NY 54 this weekend.

Then I won't update the list until you're done.

And I got a 54 today. This time it's PA 54, so I'm now at 56.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Caps81943 on June 10, 2023, 02:07:08 AM
Got an 86 recently, leaving me fully completed through double digits!

US-1 US-2 VA-3 DE-4 VA-5 US-6 VA-7 KY-8 VA-9
US-10 US-11 US-12 IN-13 US-14 US-15 WI-16 US-17 US-18 US-19
I-20 TX-21 US-22 WI-23 VA-24 US-25 WI-26 US-27 VA-28 US-29
US-30 US-31 WI-32 US-33 MD-34 US-35 US-36 IN-37 IN-38 I-39
US-40 US-41 WI-42 I-43 I-44 I-45 US-46 WI-47 US-48 US-49
US-50 US-51 US-52 IN-53 WI-54 VA-55 MD-56 WI-57 US-58 I-59
US-60 US-61 US-62 MD-63 I-64 I-65 I-66 WI-67 I-68 I-69
I-70 I-71 I-72 WI-73 I-74 I-75 I-76 I-77 US-78 I-79
I-80 I-81 CT-82 I-83 US-84 MD-85 TX-86I-87 AR-88 I-89
I-90 I-91 NE-92 I-93 I-94 I-95 I-96 I-97 AK-98 I-99
WI-100 US-101 OK-102

I believe my next lowest is 103. There is a slight possibility I have been on an incredibly short portion of TX-103, but I have no way of knowing for sure (and it seems unlikely), so we're going with it. Really stings because I have crossed 103's in Arkansas, Indiana, Maryland, Nebraska, Texas, and Vermont lol.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 10, 2023, 09:51:01 AM
The futile effort to climb the ladder continues.  Have to say that the "102 wall" in our list is interesting.  OK 102 is quite accessible. 





























































oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny387
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
cl94358
corco355
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
cockroachking126
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
CoreySamson32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on June 10, 2023, 10:43:19 AM
Quote from: NWI_Irish96 on April 23, 2023, 04:28:50 PM
I got WI 175 and 181 today, so my lowest is now 182. I'm officially out of range of day trips now.

There is a 182 in Wisconsin, but it's wayyyy up there.

The 102 wall is interesting to me too because there's a state route 102 in the county where I live.  I'll be at work and I'll end up on IL-102 sometimes.

I'm still kicking myself that I crossed OH-207 without driving on it back in March 2021.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: corco on June 11, 2023, 07:47:08 PM
Drove NY 355 on Friday, which moves me to 367
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on June 11, 2023, 07:53:59 PM
Quote from: corco on June 11, 2023, 07:47:08 PM
Drove NY 355 on Friday, which moves me to 367

Well I guess I did not have to push myself so hard to do VA 355 or MD 355 after all.   :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on June 12, 2023, 08:02:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on June 10, 2023, 09:51:01 AM
Have to say that the "102 wall" in our list is interesting.  OK 102 is quite accessible. 

It even has a concurrency with I-40, so it's easy to get without even realizing it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on June 15, 2023, 01:23:20 AM
Since it looks like I'm getting some competition from below me...
I did pick off 387 when I was in Maryland (for Laura's meet) back in April.
So my new lowest is 392.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 15, 2023, 10:32:46 AM
Quixotic hopes spring eternal.





























































oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
cockroachking126
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
CoreySamson32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Evan_Th on June 15, 2023, 05:01:34 PM
I actually crossed MA 28 on foot while visiting Boston last month, but I didn't realize it!  I walked down the Boston Commons path adjacent to the roadway, but I didn't actually walk on the roadway or its sidewalk.

So, unfortunately, I'm still stuck at 28.  I'll probably stay there for a long while.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on June 23, 2023, 06:27:39 PM
Another update! My number went up from 32 to 38 earlier today.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bruce on June 24, 2023, 01:32:42 AM
Upon some re-review of a 2016 bus trip I took in the DC area, it turns out I did clinch a tiny portion of US 29 (where it serves as a frontage road to I-66 near Rosslyn).

My new number is 32. Once that is taken care of, I'll be able to jump up to 45.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cockroachking on June 27, 2023, 02:15:00 AM
A drive through northwestern Connecticut about 2 weeks ago resulted in a successful opportunity to knock off a segment CT-126, so my new target is 148.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on June 27, 2023, 12:05:10 PM
Behold, the results of futile efforts!






























































oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
cockroachking148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on July 04, 2023, 10:15:52 PM
Condensed version:

After taking a long-weekend road trip into Virginia, West Virginia, and Ohio, my Lowest Number route has changed from 266 to 303.  So I am now in the "300 Club".

Assuming Rothman's standings are up to date, increasing my number 37 places moves me from 14th overall to ... 14th overall.  Bah.  Guess I'm in a sparse part of the list.

The Gory Details:

I was stuck on 266 for a while since the nearest one to me was about 350 miles away in Ohio.  (Darn them for cancelling I-266 in D.C.).  While I was out that way, I also picked up 269 and 284.  Also got 310, 323, and 367 for future consideration.

The next one I need - 303 - is available on Maryland's Eastern Shore, along with a few others I need clustered together.  Maybe after the summer holidays are over, I may trek out that way and grab them.

The next "trouble maker" may be 319.  There is a tiny VA 319 near Petersburg, or I might try to get US 319 on my December trip to Florida.  (I may have been on US 319 around age 7, but I am not 100% sure, so I won't count that).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: drebbin37 on July 11, 2023, 02:05:22 AM
Now that I'm a member here, I'll go ahead and join this list at 368.

My most recent trip included OH323 and NY362, two numbers that I was previously missing.  I have no immediate plans to move up the list, but you never know when opportunity will strike.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 11, 2023, 10:39:05 PM
You should all be mad at the newbie for knocking most of you down a notch.





























































oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
cockroachking148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: flan on July 12, 2023, 12:00:31 AM
I drove a small section of WI 54 in Green Bay today, so the new lowest number route I haven't been on is 85.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: paulthemapguy on July 12, 2023, 09:10:34 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 11, 2023, 10:39:05 PM
You should all be mad at the newbie for knocking most of you down a notch.

I personally feel less alone and less strange knowing I'm not the only one who thinks about this and plays games like this. The more, the merrier!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on July 12, 2023, 09:59:52 AM
I'm just glad that I got FL 451 back in March so that I can say that I have a number that Rothman does not.   :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: clong on July 12, 2023, 12:47:51 PM
And on my recent trip, I picked up US89, so my new number is 103.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on July 12, 2023, 06:32:48 PM
Somebody wanted some clong with their flan.






























































oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
cockroachking148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
ketchup9938
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 12, 2023, 07:04:23 PM
I clinched the unsigned MD 432 today so I am up to 438.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on August 13, 2023, 09:42:56 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on July 12, 2023, 09:10:34 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 11, 2023, 10:39:05 PM
You should all be mad at the newbie for knocking most of you down a notch.

I personally feel less alone and less strange knowing I'm not the only one who thinks about this and plays games like this. The more, the merrier!

This, too.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on August 13, 2023, 08:31:53 PM
Quote from: formulanone on August 13, 2023, 09:42:56 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on July 12, 2023, 09:10:34 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 11, 2023, 10:39:05 PM
You should all be mad at the newbie for knocking most of you down a notch.

I personally feel less alone and less strange knowing I'm not the only one who thinks about this and plays games like this. The more, the merrier!

This, too.

Then again, interest in the various consecutive number games seems to have waned as this year has progressed.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on August 13, 2023, 08:34:36 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on August 13, 2023, 08:31:53 PM
Quote from: formulanone on August 13, 2023, 09:42:56 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on July 12, 2023, 09:10:34 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 11, 2023, 10:39:05 PM
You should all be mad at the newbie for knocking most of you down a notch.

I personally feel less alone and less strange knowing I'm not the only one who thinks about this and plays games like this. The more, the merrier!

This, too.

Then again, interest in the various consecutive number games seems to have waned as this year has progressed.

The addition game only stopped because we don't have any valid plays. Someone please get a photo of the PA 191/940 intersection so we can continue!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on August 14, 2023, 06:13:12 AM
Quote from: 1 on August 13, 2023, 08:34:36 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on August 13, 2023, 08:31:53 PM
Quote from: formulanone on August 13, 2023, 09:42:56 AM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on July 12, 2023, 09:10:34 AM
Quote from: Rothman on July 11, 2023, 10:39:05 PM
You should all be mad at the newbie for knocking most of you down a notch.

I personally feel less alone and less strange knowing I'm not the only one who thinks about this and plays games like this. The more, the merrier!

This, too.

Then again, interest in the various consecutive number games seems to have waned as this year has progressed.

The addition game only stopped because we don't have any valid plays. Someone please get a photo of the PA 191/940 intersection so we can continue!

74/171Fan posted one. Of course, I'm tapped out for like 7 of the next 8 numbers.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 14, 2023, 06:15:35 AM
^I posted it after seeing 1 post about it here, and thinking I had that photo.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on August 15, 2023, 10:07:38 AM
While I still have 27 as the lowest untraveled number (that was numbered as such at the time), I've grabbed one of the hardest numbers below 100 to get in Spain: 88 (few roads are numbered in the 80s and 90s). I went all the way to Albi, France to get it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Ketchup99 on August 17, 2023, 04:15:38 PM
Update: I've hit PA 38, north of Butler. So now...

OH-39
I-40
WV-41
PA-42
PA-43
PA-44
PA-45
US-46

I think that leaves me at 47.

EDIT:

Still missing 48, but that one should be easy, as it's in Pittsburgh.

OH-49
US-50
PA-51
US-52
PA-53
PA-54
FL-55
PA-56

So I think, after 47 and PA-48, my next one is 57.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on August 17, 2023, 04:51:39 PM
2Ă‚Â½ years later, I'm retaking the lead with 668 as my new lowest-numbered route.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 17, 2023, 05:41:58 PM
Quote from: formulanone on August 17, 2023, 04:51:39 PM
2Ă‚Â½ years later, I'm retaking the lead with 668 as my new lowest-numbered route.

Quick, get to Ohio and get OH 668 before oscar finds a 661 and jumps to 700 or higher.  :wow:

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 06:00:26 PM
So, Oscar will step out of his front door and take ten minutes to beat formulanone.  Some poor strategy going on here...

Still, have to give credit where credit is due for formulanone beating Oscar...for however temporarily.






























































formulanone668
oscar661
Rothman451
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
cockroachking126
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
clong89
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
flan54
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
CoreySamson32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
Bruce29
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on August 17, 2023, 06:24:07 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 06:00:26 PM
So, Oscar will step out of his front door and take ten minutes to beat formulanone.  Some poor strategy going on here...

Still, have to give credit where credit is due for formulanone beating Oscar...for however temporarily.

Everyone's overlooking that mapcat can claim, per Travel Mapping (https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=mapcat&), a lowest untraveled number of 688. He's a light user of this forum, but spends more time on TM's forum. He's also younger and much healthier than I am, so I've given up on trying to keep up with him.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on August 17, 2023, 06:27:07 PM
Quote from: Rothman on July 12, 2023, 06:32:48 PM
Somebody wanted some clong with their flan.








oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245




Quote from: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 06:00:26 PM
So, Oscar will step out of his front door and take ten minutes to beat formulanone.  Some poor strategy going on here...

Still, have to give credit where credit is due for formulanone beating Oscar...for however temporarily.

















formulanone668
oscar661
Rothman451
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245

:-o  What happened to my jump from 266 to 303?  (Yes I'm anal retentive)  (Looks like a few others also "lost" some routes as well)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on August 17, 2023, 06:35:19 PM
Quote from: oscar on August 17, 2023, 06:24:07 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 06:00:26 PM
So, Oscar will step out of his front door and take ten minutes to beat formulanone.  Some poor strategy going on here...

Still, have to give credit where credit is due for formulanone beating Oscar...for however temporarily.

Everyone's overlooking that mapcat can claim, per Travel Mapping (https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=mapcat&), a lowest untraveled number of 688. He's a light user of this forum, but spends more time on TM's forum. He's also younger and much healthier than I am, so I've given up on trying to keep up with him.

I didn't realize mapcat had crossed the 525 threshold. While not a user on this forum (that I'm aware of) michih at Travel Mapping is at 767... (https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=michih&)

(...furiously scrambles to see if 668 was an unposted county route somewhere in Florida...)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 07:52:06 PM
Quote from: oscar on August 17, 2023, 06:24:07 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 06:00:26 PM
So, Oscar will step out of his front door and take ten minutes to beat formulanone.  Some poor strategy going on here...

Still, have to give credit where credit is due for formulanone beating Oscar...for however temporarily.

Everyone's overlooking that mapcat can claim, per Travel Mapping (https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=mapcat&), a lowest untraveled number of 688. He's a light user of this forum, but spends more time on TM's forum. He's also younger and much healthier than I am, so I've given up on trying to keep up with him.

I was wondering how you were doing, since your participation has diminished.  I hope all is well.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 07:53:38 PM
Quote from: dlsterner on August 17, 2023, 06:27:07 PM
Quote from: Rothman on July 12, 2023, 06:32:48 PM
Somebody wanted some clong with their flan.








oscar661
formulanone578
Rothman451
74/171FAN432
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245




Quote from: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 06:00:26 PM
So, Oscar will step out of his front door and take ten minutes to beat formulanone.  Some poor strategy going on here...

Still, have to give credit where credit is due for formulanone beating Oscar...for however temporarily.

















formulanone668
oscar661
Rothman451
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245

:-o  What happened to my jump from 266 to 303?  (Yes I'm anal retentive)  (Looks like a few others also "lost" some routes as well)

*grumbles*

Forum really needs to come into the 21st Century.  Will update again...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 07:56:44 PM
This should be all better, now.  Mapcat can claim his prize whenever he wants.  Until then...































































formulanone668
oscar661
Rothman451
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
cockroachking148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
thspfc3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Streetman on August 17, 2023, 08:25:38 PM
I'm not big on road trips, so it's 13, because my home state, CT, has supersitiously never assigned that number to a route.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: oscar on August 17, 2023, 08:43:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 07:52:06 PM
I was wondering how you were doing, since your participation has diminished.  I hope all is well.

I've had to resort to a walker, for balance issues that started cropping up in early 2022. That didn't stop me from a cross-country road trip (five weeks, 12K miles, to the Pacific Northwest) ending a few weeks ago, and some shorter trips to Kentucky and Nebraska earlier this year, which help explain my low activity here. My doctors and I are working on improving how I manage my balance issues.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on August 17, 2023, 08:52:10 PM
Quote from: oscar on August 17, 2023, 08:43:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 07:52:06 PM
I was wondering how you were doing, since your participation has diminished.  I hope all is well.

I've had to resort to a walker, for balance issues that started cropping up in early 2022. That didn't stop me from a cross-country road trip (five weeks, 12K miles, to the Pacific Northwest) ending a few weeks ago, and some shorter trips to Kentucky and Nebraska earlier this year, which help explain my low activity here. My doctors and I are working on improving how I manage my balance issues.

Here's to hoping your balance issues get better, I wasn't aware of that.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 09:44:40 PM
Quote from: oscar on August 17, 2023, 08:43:12 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 07:52:06 PM
I was wondering how you were doing, since your participation has diminished.  I hope all is well.

I've had to resort to a walker, for balance issues that started cropping up in early 2022. That didn't stop me from a cross-country road trip (five weeks, 12K miles, to the Pacific Northwest) ending a few weeks ago, and some shorter trips to Kentucky and Nebraska earlier this year, which help explain my low activity here. My doctors and I are working on improving how I manage my balance issues.
Wish you the best.  My check engine light came on earlier this year.  Hoping the worst is behind me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on August 17, 2023, 10:22:15 PM
Quote from: formulanone on August 17, 2023, 06:35:19 PM
Quote from: oscar on August 17, 2023, 06:24:07 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 17, 2023, 06:00:26 PM
So, Oscar will step out of his front door and take ten minutes to beat formulanone.  Some poor strategy going on here...

Still, have to give credit where credit is due for formulanone beating Oscar...for however temporarily.

Everyone's overlooking that mapcat can claim, per Travel Mapping (https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=mapcat&), a lowest untraveled number of 688. He's a light user of this forum, but spends more time on TM's forum. He's also younger and much healthier than I am, so I've given up on trying to keep up with him.

I didn't realize mapcat had crossed the 525 threshold. While not a user on this forum (that I'm aware of) michih at Travel Mapping is at 767... (https://travelmapping.net/user/routesbynumber.php?units=miles&u=michih&)

(...furiously scrambles to see if 668 was an unposted county route somewhere in Florida...)

Any trips to National Trail Raceway, Mid-Ohio, or even Nelson Ledges Road Course on the docket before things get cold? (and an excuse to drive any part of Oh 668)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on August 18, 2023, 06:56:00 AM
I got OH 668 through its US 22 concurrency.  However, my first 668 (https://www.google.com/maps/@37.077758,-77.3525954,3a,15y,351.52h,86.92t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5I4-s5MhdPrIseJYtN1bFg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu) was unsurprisingly a VA SR. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 20, 2023, 08:52:52 AM
Claiming unsigned routes is for sissies.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: thspfc on August 22, 2023, 05:15:47 PM
I finally have a 3. All it took was flying across the Atlantic and stumbling onto a London street that, unbeknownst to me at the time, carries the A3.

My new number is . . . 7. Ugh. But I'll be able to get that in Minnesota. Once I do I'll be up to a somewhat respectable 31.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 23, 2023, 08:53:24 PM
Everyone give thspfc some encouragement.  "Aw, wook at your widdle 7.  We'll put it right here on the refrigerator where everyone can see it..."































































formulanone668
oscar661
Rothman451
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
cockroachking148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
thspfc7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on August 24, 2023, 03:37:54 PM
I struggle for any numbers below 100 since Spain didn't have really any routes below that number until the 80s or 90s; but then things get easier. I've realized I have now a streak from 115 to 141, which I've recently widened from 120-140. Only two numbers of the latter range (128 and 134) don't happen as "orange" (i.e. first order regional) routes in Aragon.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on August 24, 2023, 04:08:13 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 23, 2023, 08:53:24 PM
Everyone give thspfc some encouragement.  "Aw, wook at your widdle 7.  We'll put it right here on the refrigerator where everyone can see it..."

Wisconsin has it a little rough with only 2, 8, and 10 in the first ten numbers.

Or if you live in Nevada or Arizona...you have to get out of state a lot for this game.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cockroachking on August 24, 2023, 08:57:26 PM
Took a trip today to Central Connecticut to drive some segments of CT-148 and CT-167. This now makes my target number 184, though hopefully for a very short time.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 24, 2023, 09:04:18 PM
Quote from: cockroachking on August 24, 2023, 08:57:26 PM
Took a trip today to Central Connecticut to drive some segments of CT-148 and CT-167. This now makes my target number 184, though hopefully for a very short time.
I'll wait for the "very short time," then.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: deathtopumpkins on August 25, 2023, 10:58:54 AM
Forgot this thread existed, and unfortunately drove right past one end of CA 245 back in May, and right past VA 245 a few weeks ago.

Grr.

Maybe on one of my upcoming drives to Chicago I'll make a little detour through the Finger Lakes...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cockroachking on August 26, 2023, 08:56:24 PM
Quote from: Rothman on August 24, 2023, 09:04:18 PM
Quote from: cockroachking on August 24, 2023, 08:57:26 PM
Took a trip today to Central Connecticut to drive some segments of CT-148 and CT-167. This now makes my target number 184, though hopefully for a very short time.
I'll wait for the "very short time," then.
Clinched NJ-184 today, so up to 204 I go. Definitely won't be a short wait for that one.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on August 26, 2023, 11:18:20 PM
Big jump for the King of Cockroaches.































































formulanone668
oscar661
Rothman451
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
cockroachking204
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
kurumi18
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
thspfc7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kurumi on August 27, 2023, 01:33:57 AM
Ladies and Gentlemen, I am pleased to announce that my number is no longer 18.

Recently, with US 18, SD 48, and WA 106 (long story), I'm now at 141.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 10, 2023, 08:11:17 AM
A big, belated jump for kurumi, although 141 should be near where he is (maybe?)?































































formulanone668
oscar661
Rothman451
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Konza424
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
cl94358
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
cockroachking204
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
thspfc7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cl94 on September 19, 2023, 12:45:53 AM
I got KY 358 and OH 368 on my current trip, which brings my lowest undriven up to 382. These gaps are getting harder to fill as I move up.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on September 19, 2023, 06:31:46 AM
Quote from: cl94 on September 19, 2023, 12:45:53 AM
I got KY 358 and OH 368 on my current trip, which brings my lowest undriven up to 382. These gaps are getting harder to fill as I move up.

You could go out of your way to clinch MD 382 or PA 382 if you continue to attend TRB. 
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 19, 2023, 07:00:42 AM
Quote from: cl94 on September 19, 2023, 12:45:53 AM
I got KY 358 and OH 368 on my current trip, which brings my lowest undriven up to 382. These gaps are getting harder to fill as I move up.
You don't say. ;D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on September 19, 2023, 09:39:20 AM
For me it will be a PITA to get to 100 due to how Spanish routes are numbered, afterwards it eases a bit.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on September 19, 2023, 05:45:16 PM
Quote from: Rothman on June 27, 2023, 12:05:10 PM
Behold, the results of futile efforts!

"I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part."- Eric "Otter" Stratton, "National Lampoon's Animal House"

Konza's been out route searching again, and hereby reports the following routes as traveled:

424, 425:  Kentucky
426:  Louisiana
427:  New Mexico
428, 429:  Louisiana
430:  Interstate
431:  US
432:  Mississippi
433:  Louisiana
434:  New Mexico
435:  Interstate
436:  Florida
437:  Pennsylvania
438:  New Mexico
439:  Kentucky
440:  Interstate
441:  US
442:  Louisiana
443:  Indiana (decommissioned 2013)
444:  Louisiana
445:  New Mexico
446:  Kentucky
447:  Montana
448:  New Mexico
449:  Kentucky
450:  Maryland
451:  New Mexico
452:  Tennessee
453:  South Carolina
454:  Louisiana
455:  Tennessee
456, 457:  New Mexico
458:  Louisiana
459:  Interstate
460:  US
461:  Louisiana
462:  New Mexico
463:  Mississippi
464, 465:  Interstate
466, 467, 468, 469:  New Mexico
470, 471: Interstate
472:  New Mexico
473: Arizona
474, 475, 476:  Interstate
477:  Pennsylvania
478:  New Mexico
479:  Kentucky
480:  Interstate
481:  Louisiana
482, 483:  Florida
484:  New Mexico
485, 486:  Louisiana
487:  Pennsylvania
488, 489, 490:  Louisiana
491:  US
492, 493:  Louisiana
494, 495, 496:  Interstate
497, 498, 499:  Louisiana
500:  New Mexico
501:  Louisiana
502, 503:  New Mexico

Hoping to stay on or near the podium for a while...

Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 19, 2023, 11:07:36 PM
Quote from: Konza on September 19, 2023, 05:45:16 PM
Quote from: Rothman on June 27, 2023, 12:05:10 PM
Behold, the results of futile efforts!

"I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part."- Eric "Otter" Stratton, "National Lampoon's Animal House"

Konza's been out route searching again, and hereby reports the following routes as traveled:

424, 425:  Kentucky
426:  Louisiana
427:  New Mexico
428, 429:  Louisiana
430:  Interstate
431:  US
432:  Mississippi
433:  Louisiana
434:  New Mexico
435:  Interstate
436:  Florida
437:  Pennsylvania
438:  New Mexico
439:  Kentucky
440:  Interstate
441:  US
442:  Louisiana
443:  Indiana (decommissioned 2013)
444:  Louisiana
445:  New Mexico
446:  Kentucky
447:  Montana
448:  New Mexico
449:  Kentucky
450:  Maryland
451:  New Mexico
452:  Tennessee
453:  South Carolina
454:  Louisiana
455:  Tennessee
456, 457:  New Mexico
458:  Louisiana
459:  Interstate
460:  US
461:  Louisiana
462:  New Mexico
463:  Mississippi
464, 465:  Interstate
466, 467, 468, 469:  New Mexico
470, 471: Interstate
472:  New Mexico
473: Arizona
474, 475, 476:  Interstate
477:  Pennsylvania
478:  New Mexico
479:  Kentucky
480:  Interstate
481:  Louisiana
482, 483:  Florida
484:  New Mexico
485, 486:  Louisiana
487:  Pennsylvania
488, 489, 490:  Louisiana
491:  US
492, 493:  Louisiana
494, 495, 496:  Interstate
497, 498, 499:  Louisiana
500:  New Mexico
501:  Louisiana
502, 503:  New Mexico

Hoping to stay on or near the podium for a while...
So...504?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on September 19, 2023, 11:55:50 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 19, 2023, 11:07:36 PM
So...504?

Roger that.  Have one targeted in Washington on my way to Seattle next week.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 20, 2023, 11:28:41 AM
Quote from: Konza on September 19, 2023, 11:55:50 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 19, 2023, 11:07:36 PM
So...504?

Roger that.  Have one targeted in Washington on my way to Seattle next week.

Pfft.  Should have waited to report. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on September 20, 2023, 11:34:23 AM
After a very long time (two years almost exactly) being in third-place without touching my number, Konza knocks me out of third place.  Updated cl94, too.































































formulanone668
oscar661
Konza504
Rothman451
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
cockroachking204
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
thspfc7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: thspfc on September 29, 2023, 01:12:42 PM
Quote from: thspfc on August 22, 2023, 05:15:47 PM
My new number is . . . 7. Ugh. But I'll be able to get that in Minnesota. Once I do I'll be up to a somewhat respectable 31.
Got MN-7 yesterday. New number is indeed 31.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 05, 2023, 11:17:51 AM
Almost overlooked thspfc's little big jump.































































formulanone668
oscar661
Konza504
Rothman451
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
cockroachking204
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on October 05, 2023, 12:00:06 PM
Haven't been able to update my number in about two years here, but just wanted to see how many of each 100 I have left to complete.

0-99: 0
100-199: 0
200-299: 0
300-399: 3
400-499: 38
500-599: 47
600-699: 81
700-799: 88
800-899: 85
900-999: 96

Not THAT bad to get to 500, but after that, nowhere remotely close.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 09, 2023, 11:33:28 PM
The game is over.

I am all that is Man.
































































Rothman801
formulanone668
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins245
paulthemapguy207
cockroachking204
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 09, 2023, 11:36:27 PM
Here's my list of routes I've been on, keeping in mind that these are just examples and does not include every route I've been on (have to split it into two tables due to character count):

US1
US2
US3
I4
I5
US6
US7
MA8
US9
I10
US11
I12
US13
US14
I15
I16
US17
NY18
US19
I20
MA21
US22
US23
I24
I25
I26
US27
MA28
I29
I30
US31
MA32
MA33
NY34
I35
US36
I37
IA38
I39
I40
US41
NJ42
I43
I44
US45
IN46
MA47
US48
NY49
US50
US51
US52
US53
US54
I55
PA56
I57
US58
I59
US60
MN61
US62
NY63
I64
I65
I66
US67
I68
I69
I70
I71
CT72
I73
I74
I75
I76
I77
I78
I79
I80
I81
I82
I83
I84
I85
I86
I87
I88
I89
I90
I91
UT92
I93
I94
I95
I96
I97
US98
I99
VT100
US101
ME102
NY103
NY104
WI105
PA106
MA107
TN108
NJ109
I110
MA111
MA112
US113
KY114
I115
MA116
US117
TX118
US119
CA120
GA121
KY122
VA123
NH124
VT125
NY126
US127
MA128
US129
US130
US131
MA 132
MO133
VA134
I135
US136
ME137
RI138
TN139
I140
US141
NY142
MA143
NY144
MS145
MA146
MA147
UT148
NY149
US150
NY151
MI152
VT153
UT154
I155
NY156
NY157
US158
MA159
US160
IL161
IN162
US163
MO164
I165
NY166
US167
CA168
US169
NY170
PA171
TN172
CT173
CT174
I175
I176
CT177
CT178
CT179
I180
MA181
I182
MA183
I184
I185
ME186
MD187
CT188
I189
I190
US191
US192
MD193
I194
I195
I196
MD197
NY198
US199
MD200
MD201
US202
CA203
VA204
I205
US206
FL207
NJ208
US209
MD210
US211
MD212
CT213
ME214
I215
NY216
NY217
NY218
US219
I220
US221
US222
US223
US224
MD225
AR226
MD227
NY228
CT229
WV230
US231
VA232
ME233
VA234
I235
ME236
VA237
I238
WY239
I240
VA241
CA242
VA243
SD244
IN245
IN246
PA247
PA248
PA249
US250
NY251
NY252
NY253
TN254
I255
NY256
NY257
US258
US259
NY260
NY261
UT262
NY263
I264
I265
NY266
VA267
TN268
UT269
I270
I271
CT272
DE273
NY274
I275
I276
I277
I278
I279
I280
US281
NY282
I283
TN284
US285
VA286
I287
PA288
NY289
I290
I291
KY292
I293
I294
I295
NY296
NY297
NY298
NY299
NY300
US301
US302
NY303
NY304
WA305
KY306
PA307
NY308
PA309
I310
VA311
NY312
MD313
CT314
PA315
UT316
NY317
TN318
CT319
NY320
US321
US322
OH323
NY324
TN325
NY326
NY327
NY328
NY329
OH330
IN331
NY332
KY333
NY334
MD335
NY336
KY337
TX338
PA339
US340
SC341
NY342
TX LOOP343
NY344
NY345
PA346
CO347
PA348
TX349
NY350
NY351
NY352
NY353
NY354
I355
PA356
OH357
PA358
I359
US360
CT361
NY362
NY363
OH364
NY365
NY366
NY367
OH368
NY369
I370
US371
CT372
NY373
NY374
I375
I376
US377
NY378
OH379
I380
I381
PA382
NY383
I384
US385
NY386
NY387
KY388
AZ389
I390
I391
TN392
I393
I394
I395
NY396
NY397
VA398
TN399
US400
PA401
PA402
NC403
MD404
I405
NY406
LA407
NY408
NY409
I410
US411
US412
VA413
NY414
KY415
NY416
NY417
NY418
NY419
KY420
US421
US422
NY423
PA424
NY425
NY426
NY427
LA428
NY429
I430
US431
WA432
NY433
NY434
PA435
NY436
NY437
PA438
NJ439
I440
US441
FL442
NY443
OH444
PA445
NY446
PA447
NY448
PA449
OH450
KY451
PA452
KY453
NY454
KY455
MD456
VA457
NY458
MD459
US460
NC461
PA462
PA463
I464
I465
KY466
KY467
MD468
I469
I470
I471
MD472
KY473
NY474
I475
I476
PA477
I478
KY479
I480
I481
MD482
KY483
PA484
I485
KY486
NV487
NV488
MD489
I490
US491
PA492
KY493
I494
I495
I496
MD497
KY498
KY499
MD500
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 09, 2023, 11:36:51 PM
Part 2:

US501
PA502
OH503
WA504
WA505
MD506
PA507
OH508
MD509
I510
OH511
PA512
OH513
PA514
I515
I516
SC517
WA518
PA519
GA520
US521
US522
OH523
PA524
WA525
I526
SC527
FL528
OH529
WY530
NY531
PA532
PA533
PA534
I535
TX SPUR536
OH537
KY538
OH539
OR540
OH541
MD542
MD543
MD544
OH545
MD546
PA547
KY548
PA549
PA550
PA551
MD552
PA553
PA554
OH555
OH556
TX557
OH558
OH559
MD560
NC561
OH562
PA563
I564
I565
OH566
KY567
OH568
KY569
KY570
OH571
KY572
KY573
OH574
OH575
PA576
LA577
MD578
I579
I580
I581
OH582
KY583
KY584
I585
OH586
I587
PA588
NV589
I590
MD591
KY592
KY593
KY594
I595
KY596
NM597
NY598
KY599
VA600
US601
NM602
OH603
VA604
VA605
VA606
VA607
VA608
VA609
I610
MD611
WV612
VA613
CT614
OH615
VA616
OH617
VA618
VA619
VA620
VA621
VA622
MD623
VA624
VA625
VA626
KY627
VA628
VA629
I630
NY631
PA632
VA633
VA634
I635
VA636
VA637
VA638
VA639
I640
US641
VA642
VA643
VA644
VA645
PA646
VA647
VA648
VA649
VA650
VA651
VA652
VA653
VA654
PA655
VA656
VA657
VA658
VA659
VA660
VA661
VA662
VA663
I664
MD665
PA666
VA667
VA668
VA669
I670
VA671
VA672
VA673
VA674
I675
I676
VA677
I678
VA679
I680
VA681
VA682
VA683
I684
VA685
KY686
VA687
VA688
VA689
I690
I691
VA692
VA693
I694
I695
I696
VA697
VA698
VA699
SC700
US701
SC702
SC703
VA704
I705
VA706
OH707
KY708
VA709
OH710
PA711
VA712
VA713
VA714
OH715
OH716
KY717
OH718
VA719
OH720
VA721
OH722
VA723
PA724
OH725
OH726
VA727
VA728
OH729
OH730
VA731
OH732
VA733
OH734
KY735
OH736
VA737
VA738
VA739
VA740
OH741
NC742
PA743
OH744
OH745
OH746
NY747
VA748
OH749
OH750
VA751
OH752
OH753
OH754
VA755
OH756
VA757
VA758
I759
PA760
VA761
OH762
MD763
OH764
MD765
VA766
VA767
OH768
VA769
PA770
OH771
OH772
VA773
VA774
VA775
VA776
KY777
OH778
VA779
PA780
I781
VA782
VA783
VA784
OH785
VA786
I787
VA788
VA789
I790
PA791
VA792
VA793
I794
I795
VA796
VA797
VA798
VA799
OH800
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on October 10, 2023, 02:11:53 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 09, 2023, 11:33:28 PM
The game is over.

"What? Over?
Did you say "over"?
Nothing is over until WE decide it is!
Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!"
-John "Bluto" Blutarsky, "National Lampoon's Animal House"
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on October 10, 2023, 02:46:23 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 09, 2023, 11:33:28 PM
The game is over.

I am all that is Man.



Rothman801
formulanone668
oscar661
Konza504
-- snip --

Rothman, you may have just awakened the "sleeping giant" that is oscar, who will undoubtedly head out on a road trip soon and promptly get into quad digits ...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 10, 2023, 06:12:54 AM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 10, 2023, 02:46:23 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 09, 2023, 11:33:28 PM
The game is over.

I am all that is Man.



Rothman801
formulanone668
oscar661
Konza504
-- snip --

Rothman, you may have just awakened the "sleeping giant" that is oscar, who will undoubtedly head out on a road trip soon and promptly get into quad digits ...
Eh, formulanone already did that.  Up to Oscar for whatever he wants to do and I do hope he's feeling better.

But, as I sit here unequivocably on top of fhe list and the first to crack 800, I really am done with this outside of making future updates to the list for this thread.  There's too much to see out there, rather than running around the few states that have routes numbered greater than 800. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on October 10, 2023, 07:21:59 AM
Next time Rothman goes to eastern KY.  (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10219142882243425&set=a.10219142981085896)  :-D

(https://scontent.fagc1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/361667417_10219142882123422_1438706500570307864_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=5f2048&_nc_ohc=62U-bO8Iz0cAX-BOFHu&_nc_ht=scontent.fagc1-2.fna&oh=00_AfAW_6EUH7Q3vmy2ey-2ySpqa3bxmRBurgB2j3UliVDn3Q&oe=652F4B50)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 10, 2023, 11:08:34 AM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on October 10, 2023, 07:21:59 AM
Next time Rothman goes to eastern KY.  (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10219142882243425&set=a.10219142981085896)  :-D

(https://scontent.fagc1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/361667417_10219142882123422_1438706500570307864_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=813123&_nc_ohc=_lGp9YtjsksAX_Jlne8&_nc_ht=scontent.fagc1-2.fna&oh=00_AfCs-VFYAEhUy5qrcOEp0lFer9EKfP6OPpUDtVQz5y6rgg&oe=65295C90)
Heh.  I've passed by it on I-64 now multiple times.  On this last recent pass, I decided I just don't care anymore.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on October 10, 2023, 11:15:25 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 10, 2023, 11:08:34 AM
On this last recent pass, I decided I just don't care anymore.

What's your next one after 801?  It might be worth a quick detour if that will bump you up significantly more.  But, if not, then it's probably not worth it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 11, 2023, 03:48:15 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 10, 2023, 06:12:54 AM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 10, 2023, 02:46:23 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 09, 2023, 11:33:28 PM
The game is over.

I am all that is Man.



Rothman801
formulanone668
oscar661
Konza504
-- snip --

Rothman, you may have just awakened the "sleeping giant" that is oscar, who will undoubtedly head out on a road trip soon and promptly get into quad digits ...
Eh, formulanone already did that.  Up to Oscar for whatever he wants to do and I do hope he's feeling better.

But, as I sit here unequivocably on top of fhe list and the first to crack 800, I really am done with this outside of making future updates to the list for this thread.  There's too much to see out there, rather than running around the few states that have routes numbered greater than 800. :D

Congratulations!
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 11, 2023, 06:54:16 AM
Quote from: formulanone on October 11, 2023, 03:48:15 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 10, 2023, 06:12:54 AM
Quote from: dlsterner on October 10, 2023, 02:46:23 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 09, 2023, 11:33:28 PM
The game is over.

I am all that is Man.



Rothman801
formulanone668
oscar661
Konza504
-- snip --

Rothman, you may have just awakened the "sleeping giant" that is oscar, who will undoubtedly head out on a road trip soon and promptly get into quad digits ...
Eh, formulanone already did that.  Up to Oscar for whatever he wants to do and I do hope he's feeling better.

But, as I sit here unequivocably on top of fhe list and the first to crack 800, I really am done with this outside of making future updates to the list for this thread.  There's too much to see out there, rather than running around the few states that have routes numbered greater than 800. :D

Congratulations!
Thanks! :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on October 13, 2023, 08:05:35 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 18, 2022, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 18, 2022, 10:40:38 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 18, 2022, 09:27:31 AM
Do county routes count? My number would be higher if they do.

That's your decision to make.
Yep, it is your decision. 

For me and my house, however, I do not count them, for counting them is for sissies.


um...many of your >599 routes are Virginia secondary routes...?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 13, 2023, 08:15:59 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 13, 2023, 08:05:35 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 18, 2022, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 18, 2022, 10:40:38 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 18, 2022, 09:27:31 AM
Do county routes count? My number would be higher if they do.

That's your decision to make.
Yep, it is your decision. 

For me and my house, however, I do not count them, for counting them is for sissies.


um...many of your >599 routes are Virginia secondary routes...?
Still state routes.  See discussion elsewhere on the forum, as they are indeed "secondary state highways." :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 13, 2023, 08:29:46 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 10, 2023, 11:15:25 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 10, 2023, 11:08:34 AM
On this last recent pass, I decided I just don't care anymore.

What's your next one after 801?  It might be worth a quick detour if that will bump you up significantly more.  But, if not, then it's probably not worth it.

<.<
>.>

802. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Mapmikey on October 13, 2023, 08:50:27 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 13, 2023, 08:15:59 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 13, 2023, 08:05:35 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 18, 2022, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 18, 2022, 10:40:38 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 18, 2022, 09:27:31 AM
Do county routes count? My number would be higher if they do.

That's your decision to make.
Yep, it is your decision. 

For me and my house, however, I do not count them, for counting them is for sissies.


um...many of your >599 routes are Virginia secondary routes...?
Still state routes.  See discussion elsewhere on the forum, as they are indeed "secondary state highways." :D


This definition would then put the secondary routes of NC, SC and WV into play as well.  It will take me a while to figure out, but it is unlikely that I have not traveled every number <1000.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on October 13, 2023, 09:07:20 PM
I made a secondary route list for VA a while back that basically completed the 600s.  I think I stopped around 700 with that list mainly because my home county (Prince George County) skips from about 730 to the 1000s for subdivisions.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 13, 2023, 09:53:14 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 13, 2023, 08:50:27 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 13, 2023, 08:15:59 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 13, 2023, 08:05:35 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 18, 2022, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 18, 2022, 10:40:38 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 18, 2022, 09:27:31 AM
Do county routes count? My number would be higher if they do.

That's your decision to make.
Yep, it is your decision. 

For me and my house, however, I do not count them, for counting them is for sissies.


um...many of your >599 routes are Virginia secondary routes...?
Still state routes.  See discussion elsewhere on the forum, as they are indeed "secondary state highways." :D


This definition would then put the secondary routes of NC, SC and WV into play as well.  It will take me a while to figure out, but it is unlikely that I have not traveled every number <1000.

*shrug*

I don't think I counted any secondary routes from NC, SC or WV, although WV's secondary routes would probably follow my own rules (never had to worry about what NC and SC counted as secondary).  VA's secondary roads needed at least some sort of shield for it to count for me.  Didn't count any route that was unsigned.

Still, county routes?  Sissyland.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 13, 2023, 10:18:08 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 13, 2023, 09:53:14 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 13, 2023, 08:50:27 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 13, 2023, 08:15:59 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 13, 2023, 08:05:35 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 18, 2022, 01:14:22 PM
Quote from: kphoger on October 18, 2022, 10:40:38 AM
Quote from: kirbykart on October 18, 2022, 09:27:31 AM
Do county routes count? My number would be higher if they do.

That's your decision to make.
Yep, it is your decision. 

For me and my house, however, I do not count them, for counting them is for sissies.


um...many of your >599 routes are Virginia secondary routes...?
Still state routes.  See discussion elsewhere on the forum, as they are indeed "secondary state highways." :D


This definition would then put the secondary routes of NC, SC and WV into play as well.  It will take me a while to figure out, but it is unlikely that I have not traveled every number <1000.

*shrug*

I don't think I counted any secondary routes from NC, SC or WV, although WV's secondary routes would probably follow my own rules (never had to worry about what NC and SC counted as secondary).  VA's secondary roads needed at least some sort of shield for it to count for me.  Didn't count any route that was unsigned.

Still, county routes?  Sissyland.

Admittedly, many of the Virginia Secondary Routes in my collection are between 0.2 and 5 miles in length. For example, 689 was a short gravel road about a mile long. But I've been on New Jersey's CR 689 for about 7-10 miles or so. And my 638 is just some tiny alignment change that's like a glorified semi-circular driveway (but signed).

There's county also routes well over 20 miles in length, and a few in Florida that get up to 50-60 miles with the same consistent number. But then there's also little dinky county roads in some places which would be hundreds of easy pickings in a couple of afternoons.

For many states, there's not a whole lot after 200-300. And then there's Kentucky and Louisiana, with nearly everything up to 1000 (LA is missing the 200-300 gap). If you stick to a combination of all types of routes, I could probably hit up to 999 and never leave Alabama. But to play fair against those who can't easily acquire any county routes, I personally don't count them for my own purposes anymore.

Do it however you want.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on October 14, 2023, 03:09:21 AM
Quote from: Mapmikey on October 13, 2023, 08:05:35 PM
um...many of your >599 routes are Virginia secondary routes...?

I was considering throwing this flag as well.

I'm relatively new to Travel Mapping but once I embraced it, I decided that If I claimed to travel a current route, it would be one that is catalogued in Travel Mapping, and, to claim it, I would have to travel a Travel Mapping segment.

Virginia secondary state highways are not catalogued in Travel Mapping.  Neither are FM routes in Texas, although, unlike VA secondary state highways, their numbers do not repeat.  The lowest numbered VA secondary route Rothman has claimed is 600.  A quick search shows there to be 92 different State Routes in Virginia numbered 600.  There are 89 numbered 604.

I didn't go back and review the entire thread to try to determine how the rules evolved.  I'm going to keep pursuing this, as the opportunities present themselves, because I am enjoying it.  But I'm OK with the way I am going about this, and I don't think I'll be heading to Virginia anytime soon to drive down what are essentially county roads.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 14, 2023, 10:50:26 AM
Pfft.  Lots of things aren't mapped in Travel Mapping and I certainly don't keep track of anything besides Interstates in there.  Perfectly legit routes in my book are omitted from TM, if only because it's run by devoted volunteers and someone didn't get around to adding something yet.

And what rules?  Everyone has been doing their own thing in this thread,..despite my mild mockery.  The nerve!

So, yeah, I considered shielded state, US and Interstate routes, with the VA rectangles as the lowest of the low.  Unsigned routes, county routes, any other dinky weirdo municipal routes, anything outside of the US...pfft...for me.

I wouldn't consider SC's "S-xx-xxx" routes; others would.  Others use the weirdo hidden Oregon designations; I don't.  Others have counted county routes; I haven't.  And, I'm sure others would be counting VA's secondary routes like others would not.

So, it has seemed to be all good all along...even if you're a sissy.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on October 14, 2023, 10:55:31 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 14, 2023, 10:50:26 AM
anything outside of the US...pfft...

You don't accept routes outside the US?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 14, 2023, 10:55:48 AM
Quote from: 1 on October 14, 2023, 10:55:31 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 14, 2023, 10:50:26 AM
anything outside of the US...pfft...

You don't accept routes outside the US?
Not for me.  Obviously, CNGL does. :D

Whatever people say is their number has been added to the big board.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on October 14, 2023, 04:30:04 PM
For me, my personal guideline is that any highway that I count is represented as a segment in the Highway Mapping database.  It makes it easy for me to find which numbers I need.  Roads outside the US are fine with me.

One exception being decommissioned routes ... In the early 1980s I had driven on MD 46 many times.  Even though it has since been decommissioned, you can't take away the fact that "At one time in my life I drove on a highway numbered 46".  (I eventually picked up WV 46 to "legitimize" that number).

I should be OK working through the 300s and maybe the 400s.  If I get too much higher I may have to reconsider my stance on VA secondary routes. :)

But in the end, however anyone wants to count numbers is fine with me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 14, 2023, 05:41:15 PM
I had an issue where an old printout of MapQuest said I had been on NM 448.  That was to visit Petroglyph National Monument.  However, NM 448 switched over to NM 45 -- at least a southern portion -- and I couldn't remember for certain if it had been renumbered when I had driven on it.  So, I drove on another 448 route.  Problem solved.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: deathtopumpkins on October 16, 2023, 03:18:18 PM
Well Rothman may say the fun is over, but I still took the opportunity on Friday to clinch NY 245, bringing me up to...

248.
Woo.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: J N Winkler on October 22, 2023, 04:33:53 PM
I had been stuck at 101 for ages, but have just now realized I visited Big Brutus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Brutus) on July 7, 2015 (confirmed by GPS log).  So:

102:  K-102
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 22, 2023, 05:31:04 PM
I scoff at the mere mortals.

Not sure what JN intends.  He was already at 102.  So, is the next route he hasn't been on 103?
































































Rothman801
formulanone668
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
cockroachking204
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
J N Winkler102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: J N Winkler on October 23, 2023, 11:38:04 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 22, 2023, 05:31:04 PMNot sure what JN intends.  He was already at 102.  So, is the next route he hasn't been on 103?

Sorry to be unclear.  Yes, that is what I do mean.  (K-102, the route I rediscovered I had been on, is the only way to reach Big Brutus without leaving the state highway system.)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 25, 2023, 11:38:35 AM
We've had weirder claims in this thread (I'm at 98, please put me down for 87...).

Anyway, Jayhawk's headed to Puerto Rico to snag routes, so those above him might want to get on the road.

*stirs the pot from far above*

































































Rothman801
formulanone668
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
cockroachking204
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on October 25, 2023, 11:45:50 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 25, 2023, 11:38:35 AM
We've had weirder claims in this thread (I'm at 98, please put me down for 87...).

Anyway, Jayhawk's headed to Puerto Rico to snag routes, so those above him might want to get on the road.

*stirs the pot from far above*

If my wife weren't with me, I'd be getting a lot more of them. From where I'm at (missing 379), there's a pretty continuous set of numbers up to 997. Maybe I'll head back by myself sometime to try to take down the king.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 25, 2023, 01:53:39 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on October 25, 2023, 11:45:50 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 25, 2023, 11:38:35 AM
We've had weirder claims in this thread (I'm at 98, please put me down for 87...).

Anyway, Jayhawk's headed to Puerto Rico to snag routes, so those above him might want to get on the road.

*stirs the pot from far above*

If my wife weren't with me, I'd be getting a lot more of them. From where I'm at (missing 379), there's a pretty continuous set of numbers up to 997. Maybe I'll head back by myself sometime to try to take down the king.
So, this is where we're at now: Roadgeeks supporting Puerto Rico's tourism industry as we pursue this endeavor.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on October 25, 2023, 02:06:47 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 25, 2023, 01:53:39 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on October 25, 2023, 11:45:50 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 25, 2023, 11:38:35 AM
We've had weirder claims in this thread (I'm at 98, please put me down for 87...).

Anyway, Jayhawk's headed to Puerto Rico to snag routes, so those above him might want to get on the road.

*stirs the pot from far above*

If my wife weren't with me, I'd be getting a lot more of them. From where I'm at (missing 379), there's a pretty continuous set of numbers up to 997. Maybe I'll head back by myself sometime to try to take down the king.
So, this is where we're at now: Roadgeeks supporting Puerto Rico's tourism industry as we pursue this endeavor.

To be honest, I wasn't even really thinking about it. I did want to hit up all the PR interstates just as an excuse to see more of the island outside of San Juan, but then I realized that PR379 is only about a mile off of PR2 and started looking at my others in the 300's. I had plans to drive to visit a buddy in Vegas last year and I was going to try to hit on NV379 on the way, but ended up flying instead so I've been stuck on 379 for a couple of years now.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:06:50 AM
Put me down for 864.

Virginia makes this a little too easy.

Maybe a scoring system:
10 for Interstates, US Highways, National "primary" systems (Tier 1/2)
3 for primary state/province systems (Tier 3/4)
0.1 for county routes and secondaries
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 01:43:01 PM
Hehehehe...my evil plan is working.  Roadgeeks are now spending hours trying to find dinky roads just to move up the list.  Look at what I've made you do! :D


































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
cockroachking204
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on October 28, 2023, 03:40:26 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:06:50 AM
Maybe a scoring system:
10 for Interstates, US Highways, National "primary" systems (Tier 1/2)
3 for primary state/province systems (Tier 3/4)
0.1 for county routes and secondaries

I only have one that is a secondary -- MT SR373.

Of my 378 numbers:
117 are interstates
72 are no interstates, but yes US routes
188 are state/provincial route only
1 Secondary

So I would have a score of 2,454.1.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 04:14:51 PM
Hm.  Makes me think of Kentucky's secondary routes which are indistinguishable from their primary routes shield-wise.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 04:29:39 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 04:14:51 PM
Hm.  Makes me think of Kentucky's secondary routes which are indistinguishable from their primary routes shield-wise.

The point system came about after thinking how to balance distance and variety, but finding a way to reward those who are more thorough in a single system or region. If anything, someone with 100 or so should be drafting the idea...

Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 01:43:01 PM
Hehehehe...my evil plan is working.  Roadgeeks are now spending hours trying to find dinky roads just to move up the list.  Look at what I've made you do! :D

I just go wherever work sends me...it just turned out Virginia was on the menu for the last two weeks. And with the exception of one route (853), all were accomplished about 10-20 minutes from my job site.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on October 28, 2023, 06:39:44 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 04:29:39 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 01:43:01 PM
Hehehehe...my evil plan is working.  Roadgeeks are now spending hours trying to find dinky roads just to move up the list.  Look at what I've made you do! :D
I just go wherever work sends me...it just turned out Virginia was on the menu for the last two weeks. And with the exception of one route (853), all were accomplished about 10-20 minutes from my job site.

The Taylor Swift references just keep coming.   :-D  I guess deciding not to clinch PA 438 today makes me the "Anti-Hero".
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 08:23:50 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 04:29:39 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 04:14:51 PM
Hm.  Makes me think of Kentucky's secondary routes which are indistinguishable from their primary routes shield-wise.

The point system came about after thinking how to balance distance and variety, but finding a way to reward those who are more thorough in a single system or region. If anything, someone with 100 or so should be drafting the idea...

Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 01:43:01 PM
Hehehehe...my evil plan is working.  Roadgeeks are now spending hours trying to find dinky roads just to move up the list.  Look at what I've made you do! :D

I just go wherever work sends me...it just turned out Virginia was on the menu for the last two weeks. And with the exception of one route (853), all were accomplished about 10-20 minutes from my job site.
Between 668 and 853?  Interesting...Still would take you while to touch them all... :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:05:57 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 08:23:50 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 04:29:39 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 04:14:51 PM
Hm.  Makes me think of Kentucky's secondary routes which are indistinguishable from their primary routes shield-wise.

The point system came about after thinking how to balance distance and variety, but finding a way to reward those who are more thorough in a single system or region. If anything, someone with 100 or so should be drafting the idea...

Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 01:43:01 PM
Hehehehe...my evil plan is working.  Roadgeeks are now spending hours trying to find dinky roads just to move up the list.  Look at what I've made you do! :D

I just go wherever work sends me...it just turned out Virginia was on the menu for the last two weeks. And with the exception of one route (853), all were accomplished about 10-20 minutes from my job site.
Between 668 and 853?  Interesting...Still would take you while to touch them all... :D


No, only had to fill about a dozen numbers remaining from 668-863. I had many in the 800s claimed thirty-odd years ago, so I was just filling gaps on lunch breaks or after work.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 10:10:56 PM


Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:05:57 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 08:23:50 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 04:29:39 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 04:14:51 PM
Hm.  Makes me think of Kentucky's secondary routes which are indistinguishable from their primary routes shield-wise.

The point system came about after thinking how to balance distance and variety, but finding a way to reward those who are more thorough in a single system or region. If anything, someone with 100 or so should be drafting the idea...

Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 01:43:01 PM
Hehehehe...my evil plan is working.  Roadgeeks are now spending hours trying to find dinky roads just to move up the list.  Look at what I've made you do! :D

I just go wherever work sends me...it just turned out Virginia was on the menu for the last two weeks. And with the exception of one route (853), all were accomplished about 10-20 minutes from my job site.
Between 668 and 853?  Interesting...Still would take you while to touch them all... :D


No, only had to fill about a dozen numbers remaining from 668-863. I had many in the 800s claimed thirty-odd years ago, so I was just filling gaps on lunch breaks or after work.

When you could have been doing something else, like having a good lunch. :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:22:59 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 10:10:56 PM


Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:05:57 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 08:23:50 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 04:29:39 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 04:14:51 PM
Hm.  Makes me think of Kentucky's secondary routes which are indistinguishable from their primary routes shield-wise.

The point system came about after thinking how to balance distance and variety, but finding a way to reward those who are more thorough in a single system or region. If anything, someone with 100 or so should be drafting the idea...

Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 01:43:01 PM
Hehehehe...my evil plan is working.  Roadgeeks are now spending hours trying to find dinky roads just to move up the list.  Look at what I've made you do! :D

I just go wherever work sends me...it just turned out Virginia was on the menu for the last two weeks. And with the exception of one route (853), all were accomplished about 10-20 minutes from my job site.
Between 668 and 853?  Interesting...Still would take you while to touch them all... :D


No, only had to fill about a dozen numbers remaining from 668-863. I had many in the 800s claimed thirty-odd years ago, so I was just filling gaps on lunch breaks or after work.

When you could have been doing something else, like having a good lunch. :D

I get enough people-time during actual work, and enjoy an escape. Maybe once a week I meet up with coworkers for lunch or dinner.

I'm fine with packing sandwiches, fruits, and veggies.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 29, 2023, 08:00:12 AM


Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:22:59 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 10:10:56 PM


Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:05:57 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 08:23:50 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 04:29:39 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 04:14:51 PM
Hm.  Makes me think of Kentucky's secondary routes which are indistinguishable from their primary routes shield-wise.

The point system came about after thinking how to balance distance and variety, but finding a way to reward those who are more thorough in a single system or region. If anything, someone with 100 or so should be drafting the idea...

Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 01:43:01 PM
Hehehehe...my evil plan is working.  Roadgeeks are now spending hours trying to find dinky roads just to move up the list.  Look at what I've made you do! :D

I just go wherever work sends me...it just turned out Virginia was on the menu for the last two weeks. And with the exception of one route (853), all were accomplished about 10-20 minutes from my job site.
Between 668 and 853?  Interesting...Still would take you while to touch them all... :D


No, only had to fill about a dozen numbers remaining from 668-863. I had many in the 800s claimed thirty-odd years ago, so I was just filling gaps on lunch breaks or after work.

When you could have been doing something else, like having a good lunch. :D

I get enough people-time during actual work, and enjoy an escape. Maybe once a week I meet up with coworkers for lunch or dinner.

I'm fine with packing sandwiches, fruits, and veggies.

An escape to drive around suburban VA... :D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on October 29, 2023, 09:56:08 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 29, 2023, 08:00:12 AM


Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:22:59 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 10:10:56 PM


Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:05:57 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 08:23:50 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 04:29:39 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 04:14:51 PM
Hm.  Makes me think of Kentucky's secondary routes which are indistinguishable from their primary routes shield-wise.

The point system came about after thinking how to balance distance and variety, but finding a way to reward those who are more thorough in a single system or region. If anything, someone with 100 or so should be drafting the idea...

Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 01:43:01 PM
Hehehehe...my evil plan is working.  Roadgeeks are now spending hours trying to find dinky roads just to move up the list.  Look at what I've made you do! :D

I just go wherever work sends me...it just turned out Virginia was on the menu for the last two weeks. And with the exception of one route (853), all were accomplished about 10-20 minutes from my job site.
Between 668 and 853?  Interesting...Still would take you while to touch them all... :D


No, only had to fill about a dozen numbers remaining from 668-863. I had many in the 800s claimed thirty-odd years ago, so I was just filling gaps on lunch breaks or after work.

When you could have been doing something else, like having a good lunch. :D

I get enough people-time during actual work, and enjoy an escape. Maybe once a week I meet up with coworkers for lunch or dinner.

I'm fine with packing sandwiches, fruits, and veggies.

An escape to drive around suburban VA... :D

If that's what I get, then that's what it is. But Winchester is more rural and just about right.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 29, 2023, 11:53:03 AM
Quote from: formulanone on October 29, 2023, 09:56:08 AM
Quote from: Rothman on October 29, 2023, 08:00:12 AM


Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:22:59 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 10:10:56 PM


Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 10:05:57 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 08:23:50 PM
Quote from: formulanone on October 28, 2023, 04:29:39 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 04:14:51 PM
Hm.  Makes me think of Kentucky's secondary routes which are indistinguishable from their primary routes shield-wise.

The point system came about after thinking how to balance distance and variety, but finding a way to reward those who are more thorough in a single system or region. If anything, someone with 100 or so should be drafting the idea...

Quote from: Rothman on October 28, 2023, 01:43:01 PM
Hehehehe...my evil plan is working.  Roadgeeks are now spending hours trying to find dinky roads just to move up the list.  Look at what I've made you do! :D

I just go wherever work sends me...it just turned out Virginia was on the menu for the last two weeks. And with the exception of one route (853), all were accomplished about 10-20 minutes from my job site.
Between 668 and 853?  Interesting...Still would take you while to touch them all... :D


No, only had to fill about a dozen numbers remaining from 668-863. I had many in the 800s claimed thirty-odd years ago, so I was just filling gaps on lunch breaks or after work.

When you could have been doing something else, like having a good lunch. :D

I get enough people-time during actual work, and enjoy an escape. Maybe once a week I meet up with coworkers for lunch or dinner.

I'm fine with packing sandwiches, fruits, and veggies.

An escape to drive around suburban VA... :D

If that's what I get, then that's what it is. But Winchester is more rural and just about right.
Meh, that's where I got a decent number of higher route numbers in a couple of trips.  They have a fun car show and the surrounding are is scenic, but there are definitely more entertaining places to spend one's time.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cockroachking on October 29, 2023, 02:35:34 PM
Clinched VA-204 today, so my new number to drive is 226.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 29, 2023, 03:59:08 PM
*watches the roadgeeks scurry around the country trying to move up the ladder*

The madness I have wrought...


































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
cockroachking226
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: freebrickproductions on October 29, 2023, 05:22:53 PM
In terms of actually-signed highways, I think the lowest one I have not been on any that's a 3, as I've not driven on any signed SR 3s in any of the states I've been to, nor have I ever been up to seeUS 3 for myself (yet?). If we are counting unsigned highways for this (couldn't get a clear answer searching the thread), then IDK what mine would be. Probably 7 or something like that.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on October 29, 2023, 06:46:42 PM
Quote from: freebrickproductions on October 29, 2023, 05:22:53 PM
In terms of actually-signed highways, I think the lowest one I have not been on any that's a 3, as I've not driven on any signed SR 3s in any of the states I've been to, nor have I ever been up to seeUS 3 for myself (yet?). If we are counting unsigned highways for this (couldn't get a clear answer searching the thread), then IDK what mine would be. Probably 7 or something like that.
So...what do you want to go with?

I got a free brick in Nauvoo...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: freebrickproductions on October 29, 2023, 09:00:01 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 29, 2023, 06:46:42 PM
Quote from: freebrickproductions on October 29, 2023, 05:22:53 PM
In terms of actually-signed highways, I think the lowest one I have not been on any that's a 3, as I've not driven on any signed SR 3s in any of the states I've been to, nor have I ever been up to seeUS 3 for myself (yet?). If we are counting unsigned highways for this (couldn't get a clear answer searching the thread), then IDK what mine would be. Probably 7 or something like that.
So...what do you want to go with?

I got a free brick in Nauvoo...

I feel signed is more proper, given that you wouldn't know what number an unsigned one is without looking it up. Ergo, my lowest is 3.

Also, I just realized that if unsigned was counted, then I wouldn't be sure what my lowest is given that US 11 here in Alabama is also AL 7.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 05, 2023, 10:05:54 PM
3 it is.



































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
jayhawkco379
drebbin37368
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner303
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
cockroachking226
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
freebrickproductions3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on November 06, 2023, 11:32:53 PM
The lowest numbered route I haven't been on has changed from 303 to 319   -   Took a day trip this past weekend to Maryland's Eastern Shore (mostly Federalsburg) to get a bunch of the low 300s I was missing.  Thank you, Maryland, for "clustering" the state highway numbers to make gathering them easier.

Being in the "no mans land" between 248 and 334, I once again did not move up in the rankings.

The next number I need is 319.  I think the closest is VA 319 near Petersburg.  There's also US 319 in Florida.  I'm planning a holiday trip to Florida, so I'll try to grab one or both of those at that time.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on November 08, 2023, 10:36:59 AM
Quote from: freebrickproductions on October 29, 2023, 09:00:01 PM
Quote from: Rothman on October 29, 2023, 06:46:42 PM
Quote from: freebrickproductions on October 29, 2023, 05:22:53 PM
In terms of actually-signed highways, I think the lowest one I have not been on any that's a 3, as I've not driven on any signed SR 3s in any of the states I've been to, nor have I ever been up to seeUS 3 for myself (yet?). If we are counting unsigned highways for this (couldn't get a clear answer searching the thread), then IDK what mine would be. Probably 7 or something like that.
So...what do you want to go with?

I got a free brick in Nauvoo...

I feel signed is more proper, given that you wouldn't know what number an unsigned one is without looking it up. Ergo, my lowest is 3.

Also, I just realized that if unsigned was counted, then I wouldn't be sure what my lowest is given that US 11 here in Alabama is also AL 7.

I think your nearest 3 will be in Memphis, as there's a small standalone section of TN 3 in the downtown. Either that, or it's signed alongside of US 41 in Georgia, but that's no different than counting it with US 31 in Alabama. Georgia also has a couple of short, independent "3 Connector" routes around the Atlanta metro.

Someone else claimed AL 3 out of US 31, so you wouldn't be the first... (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=24342.msg2797638#msg2797638)

I personally do not count the same stretch of road twice if one is a hidden designation. For example, if you hadn't driven on any other "31" nor "3", you'd count the lower or whatever missing number of the two, whichever one was not your personal list. I have to imagine you've been on some section of US 31 in Tennessee, though. But that's just me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on November 08, 2023, 10:40:39 AM
After all is said and done after my trip to Puerto Rico, I'm now up to 437, a gain of 58. Couldn't justify going that far off the highway to nab it. I got a good amount of numbers that were close to the highway though. 388 was the only one I needed to make a little extra effort to get to.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on November 08, 2023, 11:11:29 AM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on November 08, 2023, 10:40:39 AM
After all is said and done after my trip to Puerto Rico, I'm now up to 437, a gain of 58. Couldn't justify going that far off the highway to nab it. I got a good amount of numbers that were close to the highway though. 388 was the only one I needed to make a little extra effort to get to.

You can also really rack them up in the 437-450 range around Louisiana's North Shore.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on November 08, 2023, 11:20:54 AM
PA 437 and PA 438 are also not that far from each other.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cenlaroads on November 08, 2023, 06:56:03 PM
The lowest I haven't been on is 23.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cockroachking on November 12, 2023, 06:41:11 PM
Clinched VA-226 today, so my new number is 232. No leaderboard motion.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on November 12, 2023, 06:49:28 PM
Quote from: cockroachking on November 12, 2023, 06:41:11 PM
Clinched VA-226 today, so my new number is 232. No leaderboard motion.

I drove by VA 226 early this morning as I took US 460 WB towards Lynchburg.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 12, 2023, 07:16:52 PM
*laughs at the mere mortals below*

I think I caught all the changes.



































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37368
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner319
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
cockroachking232
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
freebrickproductions3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 12, 2023, 07:32:56 PM
Just as a demotivator, just see how far some of you have to go to catch up:

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53328572375_239cf9e78c_k.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2pfsSCp)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cockroachking on November 12, 2023, 08:12:20 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on November 12, 2023, 06:49:28 PM
Quote from: cockroachking on November 12, 2023, 06:41:11 PM
Clinched VA-226 today, so my new number is 232. No leaderboard motion.

I drove by VA 226 early this morning as I took US 460 WB towards Lynchburg.
I was on US-460 EB from Burkeville to Petersburg in the late morning. Only missed each other by a couple hours I guess.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 7/8 on November 13, 2023, 09:05:02 AM
Quote from: Rothman on November 12, 2023, 07:32:56 PM
Just as a demotivator, just see how far some of you have to go to catch up:

Whatever software you used change my username to "8-Jul". :-D
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 13, 2023, 02:09:28 PM
Quote from: 7/8 on November 13, 2023, 09:05:02 AM
Quote from: Rothman on November 12, 2023, 07:32:56 PM
Just as a demotivator, just see how far some of you have to go to catch up:

Whatever software you used change my username to "8-Jul". :-D
Ah, Excel...

I used to remember to watch out for that, but now I just don't care.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: drebbin37 on November 13, 2023, 10:16:32 PM
While driving around the Delmarva this weekend, I clinched the quarter-mile long MD 368, so my new number is 381.  Still four more to go before reaching the 400s.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CovalenceSTU on November 14, 2023, 03:43:51 PM
Looks like mine will be on 1 for a long time; the closest ones ;-) are BC-1 (almost 6 hours away), ID-1 (9 hours), and CA-1 (10.5 hours).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on November 15, 2023, 02:13:11 AM
Quote from: CovalenceSTU on November 14, 2023, 03:43:51 PM
2. (doesn't exist in OR or WA)

When was US 2 removed from Washington state?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CovalenceSTU on November 15, 2023, 12:38:49 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on November 15, 2023, 02:13:11 AM
Quote from: CovalenceSTU on November 14, 2023, 03:43:51 PM
2. (doesn't exist in OR or WA)

When was US 2 removed from Washington state?
Ah whoops, I looked up the state routes list to double check and forgot US-2 wouldn't be in it.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JayhawkCO on November 15, 2023, 12:51:18 PM
Quote from: CovalenceSTU on November 15, 2023, 12:38:49 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on November 15, 2023, 02:13:11 AM
Quote from: CovalenceSTU on November 14, 2023, 03:43:51 PM
2. (doesn't exist in OR or WA)

When was US 2 removed from Washington state?
Ah whoops, I looked up the state routes list to double check and forgot US-2 wouldn't be in it.

Also, if you want to be pedantic, and if you're on this website, you do, I-5 is technically Pacific Highway #1 in Oregon.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 15, 2023, 11:18:39 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on November 15, 2023, 12:51:18 PM
Quote from: CovalenceSTU on November 15, 2023, 12:38:49 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on November 15, 2023, 02:13:11 AM
Quote from: CovalenceSTU on November 14, 2023, 03:43:51 PM
2. (doesn't exist in OR or WA)

When was US 2 removed from Washington state?
Ah whoops, I looked up the state routes list to double check and forgot US-2 wouldn't be in it.

Also, if you want to be pedantic, and if you're on this website, you do, I-5 is technically Pacific Highway #1 in Oregon.
Phttbbbbbbbt.  Silly people count the hidden Oregon designations.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: kphoger on November 16, 2023, 01:23:58 PM
Quote from: Rothman on November 15, 2023, 11:18:39 PM
Phttbbbbbbbt.  Silly people count the hidden Oregon designations.

Pros count Olive Garden table numbers.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on November 16, 2023, 03:25:38 PM
drebbin updated; waiting on Cova-whatzit to decide what number is really theirs.



































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner319
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
cockroachking232
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202238
CoreySamson38
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
freebrickproductions3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Bickendan on November 21, 2023, 02:10:19 AM
Quote from: Rothman on November 15, 2023, 11:18:39 PM
Quote from: JayhawkCO on November 15, 2023, 12:51:18 PM
Quote from: CovalenceSTU on November 15, 2023, 12:38:49 PM
Quote from: CNGL-Leudimin on November 15, 2023, 02:13:11 AM
Quote from: CovalenceSTU on November 14, 2023, 03:43:51 PM
2. (doesn't exist in OR or WA)

When was US 2 removed from Washington state?
Ah whoops, I looked up the state routes list to double check and forgot US-2 wouldn't be in it.

Also, if you want to be pedantic, and if you're on this website, you do, I-5 is technically Pacific Highway #1 in Oregon.
Phttbbbbbbbt.  Silly people count the hidden Oregon designations.
I am silly! :)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on December 11, 2023, 05:40:05 PM
I drove on AR 38 on my trip to Memphis this past week, so my new lowest number is now... 39. The best option to get that appears to be FM 39, which I could grab on my way back to college in January. After that, my next numbers are 47, 52, and 58, which should not be too hard to get.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hunty2022 on December 11, 2023, 07:03:52 PM
Speaking of 39........ I forgot to post it, but that is now my new lowest number too, since I was on GA-38 multiple times during my trip down to Georgia. @CoreySamson, if your next lowest is 47, you will have actually passed me once you get FM-39.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 12, 2023, 06:54:42 PM
The peons make it up a single rung...



































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner319
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
cockroachking232
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
CoreySamson39
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
freebrickproductions3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: cockroachking on December 17, 2023, 12:28:50 PM
This peon clinched PA-232 yesterday, so up to 266 he moves, and will probably stay for a while...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: JoePCool14 on December 17, 2023, 12:56:53 PM
I thought I had replied to this thread before, maybe it just didn't get picked up in the table, but put me down for 4 as the lowest I haven't been on.

Until earlier this year, the lowest I hadn't been on was 1. But I finally got some segments clinched for IL-1. I have IL-2 and IN-2, and IA-3. IN-4 wouldn't be too far away. I'm also missing 5, I'll have to head over to Davenport to pick up IL-5.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on December 21, 2023, 09:38:21 PM
Oh.  People moved a little or joined the board.


































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner319
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
CoreySamson39
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
freebrickproductions3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on January 11, 2024, 09:43:00 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on December 11, 2023, 05:40:05 PM
The best option to get that appears to be FM 39, which I could grab on my way back to college in January.
Earlier today I completed this roadgeeking side quest by picking up a tiny piece of FM 39, which puts my number up to 47.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on January 11, 2024, 09:49:52 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on January 11, 2024, 09:43:00 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on December 11, 2023, 05:40:05 PM
The best option to get that appears to be FM 39, which I could grab on my way back to college in January.
Earlier today I completed this roadgeeking side quest by picking up a tiny piece of FM 39, which puts my number up to 47.
Next stop, College Station.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on January 11, 2024, 09:52:05 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 11, 2024, 09:49:52 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on January 11, 2024, 09:43:00 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on December 11, 2023, 05:40:05 PM
The best option to get that appears to be FM 39, which I could grab on my way back to college in January.
Earlier today I completed this roadgeeking side quest by picking up a tiny piece of FM 39, which puts my number up to 47.
Next stop, College Station.
Crap, I literally drove through there on my route back to college today! I guess spring break I might head back the same way.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 11, 2024, 10:29:35 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 11, 2024, 09:49:52 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on January 11, 2024, 09:43:00 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on December 11, 2023, 05:40:05 PM
The best option to get that appears to be FM 39, which I could grab on my way back to college in January.
Earlier today I completed this roadgeeking side quest by picking up a tiny piece of FM 39, which puts my number up to 47.
Next stop, College Station.
"Next stop: Rocket science!"
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: boilerup25 on January 11, 2024, 11:13:14 PM
For me, that would be number 48.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on January 12, 2024, 06:06:54 AM
Quote from: Rothman on January 11, 2024, 10:29:35 PM
Quote from: formulanone on January 11, 2024, 09:49:52 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on January 11, 2024, 09:43:00 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on December 11, 2023, 05:40:05 PM
The best option to get that appears to be FM 39, which I could grab on my way back to college in January.
Earlier today I completed this roadgeeking side quest by picking up a tiny piece of FM 39, which puts my number up to 47.
Next stop, College Station.
"Next stop: Rocket science!"
...for some Wikipedia admins, map-reading is rocket science.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: elsmere241 on January 12, 2024, 11:27:09 AM
My guess is 21, though I've crossed the interchange on I-81 where US 21 ends several times.  Next is 27, though I've been through the interchange on I-40 where I-27's current north end is.  I can't think of a 28, unless there's some state route I've been on that I don't remember.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: freebrickproductions on January 12, 2024, 09:42:30 PM
Drove on US 41/GA 3 yesterday, so I can definitely say I've been on a route numbered 3. I also remember being on GA 7 down around Cordele so, so it's gonna be higher than 7.

Unless driving across exactly one railroad crossing at the eastern end of GA 18 counts as "having been on", along with stopping to take pictures and videos of said railroad crossing, then I believe 18 should be the lowest route number I ain't been on yet. If it does, I'm gonna have to keep counting up.

EDIT: If GA 18 does count as having "been on", then my next lowest will be 28, I'm fairly certain.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 14, 2024, 05:22:28 PM
Quote from: freebrickproductions on January 12, 2024, 09:42:30 PM
Drove on US 41/GA 3 yesterday, so I can definitely say I've been on a route numbered 3. I also remember being on GA 7 down around Cordele so, so it's gonna be higher than 7.

Unless driving across exactly one railroad crossing at the eastern end of GA 18 counts as "having been on", along with stopping to take pictures and videos of said railroad crossing, then I believe 18 should be the lowest route number I ain't been on yet. If it does, I'm gonna have to keep counting up.

EDIT: If GA 18 does count as having "been on", then my next lowest will be 28, I'm fairly certain.

Pick one.  I think the majority of us do not count crossing routes at an intersection.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 14, 2024, 05:24:32 PM
*yawn* Boring.



































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner319
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
boilerup2548
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
CoreySamson47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
elsmere24121
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
freebrickproductions3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: freebrickproductions on January 14, 2024, 06:10:26 PM
Quote from: Rothman on January 14, 2024, 05:22:28 PM
Quote from: freebrickproductions on January 12, 2024, 09:42:30 PM
Drove on US 41/GA 3 yesterday, so I can definitely say I've been on a route numbered 3. I also remember being on GA 7 down around Cordele so, so it's gonna be higher than 7.

Unless driving across exactly one railroad crossing at the eastern end of GA 18 counts as "having been on", along with stopping to take pictures and videos of said railroad crossing, then I believe 18 should be the lowest route number I ain't been on yet. If it does, I'm gonna have to keep counting up.

EDIT: If GA 18 does count as having "been on", then my next lowest will be 28, I'm fairly certain.

Pick one.  I think the majority of us do not count crossing routes at an intersection.
Wasn't going across it at an intersection, I'm fairly certain I've driven down it all of 70-ish feet to get across the Georgia Central's Macon Subdivision at least once. This (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.6877375,-83.34642,3a,70.4y,241.16h,84t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0GdAye5TAedY-dytHJzpLA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu) would be where I've driven any of it, between the road/church parking look to the right of where the image was taken and the 4-way Stop at US 80 on the opposite side of the tracks.

If it's too short to count, then 18 would be my lowest number.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 15, 2024, 07:12:43 AM
It's up to you whether you count it or not. I count 47 as done because I've done like a block of OK-47. Too short to register on TM, but I was there, so I count it. Do you feel like you need to go find an 18 for it to count?
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: freebrickproductions on January 15, 2024, 12:52:04 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on January 15, 2024, 07:12:43 AM
It's up to you whether you count it or not. I count 47 as done because I've done like a block of OK-47. Too short to register on TM, but I was there, so I count it. Do you feel like you need to go find an 18 for it to count?

Makes sense. I'm gonna count it, since I did travel down it at least some amount of measurable distance. I'm gonna go with 28 as my lowest then.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 15, 2024, 03:43:46 PM
Whatever.




































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN438
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner319
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
boilerup2548
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
CoreySamson47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
freebrickproductions28
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
elsmere24121
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on January 21, 2024, 09:56:09 AM
I clinched PA 438 yesterday so I am up to 448.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 23, 2024, 09:15:55 PM
An easy one...




































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN448
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner319
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114113
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
boilerup2548
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
CoreySamson47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
freebrickproductions28
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
elsmere24121
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: dlsterner on January 28, 2024, 04:09:32 PM
Minor update ...

My lowest number has moved from 319 to 325.  I'll soon be out of that "no mans land" between 266 and 334 where nobody else is.

Looks like the nearest 325 to me is PA 325 north of Harrisburg PA.  A reasonable day trip or overnight trip.  I can also catch PA 333 (another upcoming number that I need) while out that way.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on January 29, 2024, 02:04:57 AM
I just clinched OK-113, which is probably going to be my last Oklahoma highway clinch.

That puts me at 121. And I may be stuck there for a while, since NV-121 was decommissioned a couple of years ago, and the 121s in surrounding states are all as far away from Nevada as possible.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on January 31, 2024, 09:13:02 AM
More easy ones...




































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN448
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner325
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114121
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
boilerup2548
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
CoreySamson47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
texaskdog42
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
Dough487228
freebrickproductions28
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
elsmere24121
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Dough4872 on February 10, 2024, 06:03:36 PM
Quote from: Dough4872 on May 30, 2023, 08:22:33 PM
Lowest number I haven't been on is 28

Was on NJ 28 today, so the lowest number I haven't been on is 43.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: 74/171FAN on February 10, 2024, 07:53:41 PM
I clinched NY 448 this morning so I am up to 449.  I doubt I will clinch PA 449 next weekend.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 14, 2024, 12:59:31 PM
Kind of weird that someone with a Penna Turnpike shield as their avatar hasn't been on a 43...





































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
74/171FAN449
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
Hot Rod Hootenanny392
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner325
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114121
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
boilerup2548
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
CoreySamson47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
Dough487243
texaskdog42
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
freebrickproductions28
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
elsmere24121
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Dough4872 on February 14, 2024, 01:38:46 PM
Quote from: Rothman on February 14, 2024, 12:59:31 PM
Kind of weird that someone with a Penna Turnpike shield as their avatar hasn't been on a 43...

I live in the other end of the state from PA 43, furthest west I've been on the Pennsylvania Turnpike is Breezewood. If I'm gonna cross 43 off my list, MD 43 is more likely as it's closer to me.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 20, 2024, 10:34:40 PM
Drove from Ohio to Louisiana (and will start back tomorrow).
Got in a roadmeet, a birthday party, and drove a bunch of roads.
So now my lowest number is 464.
(2/3 way through my Ohio route number desert)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 24, 2024, 07:42:01 PM
74/171 FAN just got jumped over by a Hot Rod Hootenanny.





































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza504
Hot Rod Hootenanny464
74/171FAN449
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner325
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114121
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
boilerup2548
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
CoreySamson47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
Dough487243
texaskdog42
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
freebrickproductions28
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
elsmere24121
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on February 29, 2024, 07:44:57 PM
Doesn't look like this changes the running order, but want to convey that I have now traveled the following routes:

504:  Washington
505:  New Mexico
506, 507, 508:  Washington
509:  Louisiana
510:  Interstate (LA)
511:  New Mexico
512, 513:  Washington
514:  Florida
515:  Interstate (NV)
516:  Interstate (GA)
517:  Louisiana
518:  New Mexico
519:  Washington
520:  Indiana
521:  Louisiana
522:  US
523:  New Mexico
524:  Florida
525:  New Mexico
526:  Indiana (decommissioned 2013)
527:  New Mexico
528:  Florida
529:  New Mexico
530:  Interstate (AR)
531, 532:  New Mexico
533:  Kentucky
534:  Louisiana
535, 536:  Florida
537, 538, 539:  New Mexico
540:  Interstate (AR)
541:  Louisiana
542:  New Mexico
543:  Kentucky
544:  Florida
545:  Louisiana
546, 547:  New Mexico
548:  Florida
549:  New Mexico
550:  US
551:  Oregon
552:  Florida
553:  Michigan
554:  Louisiana
555:  Interstate (AR)
556:  New Mexico
557, 558:  Louisiana
559:  Florida
560:  Louisiana (560-2)
561, 562:  Ohio
563:  Florida
564:  New Mexico
565:  Interstate (AL)
566:  Florida
567:  New Mexico

Accordingly, please change my lowest-numbered route not traveled to 568.  There's one in New Mexico...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on February 29, 2024, 10:46:15 PM
Ok, then.





































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza568
Hot Rod Hootenanny464
74/171FAN449
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner325
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114121
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
boilerup2548
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
CoreySamson47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
Dough487243
texaskdog42
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
freebrickproductions28
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
elsmere24121
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on March 01, 2024, 11:40:07 PM
Quote from: Rothman on February 29, 2024, 10:46:15 PM
Ok, then.



formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza568
Hot Rod Hootenanny464

Damn! I thought I could catch Konza with a day driving in Maryland. Not anymore.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: jlam on March 01, 2024, 11:49:53 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on March 01, 2024, 11:40:07 PM
Quote from: Rothman on February 29, 2024, 10:46:15 PM
Ok, then.




formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza568
Hot Rod Hootenanny464
idk1

Damn! I thought I could catch Konza with a day driving in Maryland. Not anymore.

No need to rub it in |idk|'s face. He's suffered enough.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on March 02, 2024, 12:03:51 AM
Quote from: jlam on March 01, 2024, 11:49:53 PM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on March 01, 2024, 11:40:07 PM
Quote from: Rothman on February 29, 2024, 10:46:15 PM
Ok, then.




formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza568
Hot Rod Hootenanny464
idk1

Damn! I thought I could catch Konza with a day driving in Maryland. Not anymore.

No need to rub it in |idk|'s face. He's suffered enough.

Fixed on my end. :sombrero: I didn't realize there was a name inbetween all those table brackets at the end.  :-D :wave:
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: TheCatalyst31 on March 02, 2024, 12:15:35 AM
I got a few I was missing in the past few months, so my lowest is 112. (Which I might be at for a bit - WI 112 is on the opposite end of the state from me, and I don't think any of the neighboring states have a 112.)
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: ElishaGOtis on March 04, 2024, 02:54:01 PM
32, of all numbers, would be my lowest. I guess I kept unintentionally dodging it during my travels. :coffee:

Just to name a few routes I've used (one example for each number)... US-1, FL-2, FL-3, I-4, I-5, US-6, AL-7, Autobahn 8, FL-9, I-10, US-11, I-12, FL-13, I-14, I-15, I-16, US-17, MD-18, US-19, I-20, FL-21, FL-22, FL-23, I-24, FL-25, I-26, US-27, MA-28, US-29, FL-30, and US-31. Some of these are unsigned.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 04, 2024, 08:32:42 PM
TheCatalyst31 doesn't appear to have been on my list, so two newcomers...





































































formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza568
Hot Rod Hootenanny464
74/171FAN449
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner325
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114121
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
TheCatalyst31112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
boilerup2548
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
CoreySamson47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
Dough487243
texaskdog42
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
ElishaGOtis32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
freebrickproductions28
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
elsmere24121
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Konza on March 05, 2024, 01:28:07 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on March 01, 2024, 11:40:07 PM
Damn! I thought I could catch Konza with a day driving in Maryland. Not anymore.

Saw headlights in my rear view mirror.  Elected to accelerate.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: fwydriver405 on March 05, 2024, 02:22:37 AM
Put me down for 19 on that list.

39 would have been the lowest after 19, had I travelled on A-19 in Montréal in May 2023, but that never happened, so it stands as is. There is a MA Route 19 a bit west of Worcester, so could be an easy checkmark off the list as it's a bit close to me. After 19 and 39, third lowest numbered route would be 42.

1: US, CA, MA (as 1A), NH (as 1A and B), RI (as 1A)
2: US, CA, CT, MA, RI, VT
3: US, CT, ME, MA, NH (as 3A), NJ, RI
4: I, US, GB (A/M), ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, RI
5: I, US, ME
6: US, ME, MA (as 6A)
7: US, CO, ME, NJ, NY, RI
8: CT, ME, OH
9: US, CT, ME, MA, NH, NY (as 9A)
10: I, CT, MA, NH, QC, RI
11: US, GB (A), ME, NH,
12: MA, RI, VT
13: GB (A), NH
14: OH, VT
15: CT, ME, QC, VT
16: ME, MA, NH
17: CT, ME, NJ, NY
18: MA, NH, NJ
19: -none-
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: formulanone on March 05, 2024, 08:23:01 AM
Quote from: ElishaGOtis on March 04, 2024, 02:54:01 PM
32, of all numbers, would be my lowest. I guess I kept unintentionally dodging it during my travels. :coffee:

Just to name a few routes I've used (one example for each number)... US-1, FL-2, FL-3, I-4, I-5, US-6, AL-7, Autobahn 8, FL-9, I-10, US-11, I-12, FL-13, I-14, I-15, I-16, US-17, MD-18, US-19, I-20, FL-21, FL-22, FL-23, I-24, FL-25, I-26, US-27, MA-28, US-29, FL-30, and US-31. Some of these are unsigned.

Florida has a quite a few missing numbers up to 39; some are hidden and others seemed to have been "reserved" or forgotten.

If this post began in say, 2011; I would probably be stuck in the range of 28-38.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on March 17, 2024, 05:47:49 PM
I grabbed a 47 yesterday (escaping the logjam at 47), so my new lowest number is now 58.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Scott5114 on March 17, 2024, 06:26:33 PM
Quote from: CoreySamson on March 17, 2024, 05:47:49 PM
I grabbed a 47 yesterday (escaping the logjam at 47), so my new lowest number is now 58.

OK-58 is interesting. Both of them have weird northern termini.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on March 18, 2024, 10:49:34 AM
An overdue update, probably due to a Tapatalk glitch in marking posts unread...

formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza568
Hot Rod Hootenanny464
74/171FAN449
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner325
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114121
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
TheCatalyst31112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
Eth63
CoreySamson58
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
boilerup2548
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
Big John46
ozarkman41746
Dough487243
texaskdog42
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
ElishaGOtis32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
stevashe29
freebrickproductions28
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
elsmere24121
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
fwydriver40519
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: CoreySamson on March 29, 2024, 07:45:01 PM
Forgot to mention this since it happened during the forum update, but I drove on a 58 this last Saturday, which puts me up to 68. Considering that I was stuck at 2 just 3 years ago, I feel like I've made some good progress since then. Only 7 more numbers until I reach 100 (68, 73, 78, 81, 88, 89, 93).
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: stevashe on April 13, 2024, 10:36:11 PM
Finally got on a 29 (after multiple missed opportunities, one of which was caused by a dying phone...) so my lowest is now 47. Luckily OR 47 isn't too far away...
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: Rothman on April 14, 2024, 12:18:43 AM
*yawn*

formulanone864
Rothman801
oscar661
Konza568
Hot Rod Hootenanny464
74/171FAN449
jayhawkco437
Duke87432
Mapmikey429
HTM Duke386
cl94382
drebbin37381
corco367
hbelkins334
dlsterner325
cockroachking266
froggie248
deathtopumpkins248
paulthemapguy207
US 89192
Jim184
NWI_Irish96182
plain174
csw174
rel4170
hockeyjohn154
dfilpus149
A.J. Bertin148
kurumi141
Thing 342127
Scott5114121
Buck87112
SGwithADD112
TheCatalyst31112
Bitmapped111
algorerhythms111
bassoon1986109
Bickendan109
adwerkema108
SEWIGuy108
amroad17107
Great Lakes Roads107
tq-07fan107
SD Mapman107
Caps81943103
clong103
J N Winkler103
sparker102
TheHighwayMan394102
DandyDan102
sbeaver44102
skluth102
Flint197997
hobsini97
jlam97
1995hoo96
SkyPesos89
7/888
I-5586
flan85
chesapeake25684
webny9968
CoreySamson68
Eth63
bwana3956
BlueOutback756
BrianP53
mgk92048
fredddie48
boilerup2548
milbfan47
noelbotevera47
TBKS147
ketchup9947
stevashe47
Big John46
ozarkman41746
Dough487243
texaskdog42
Hunty202239
averageroadgeek37
hen3ry36
ipeters6135
Evan_Th33
FrCorySticha33
ran4sh32
Bruce32
ElishaGOtis32
Thunderbyrd31631
thspfc31
doorknob6029
Ben11429
freebrickproductions28
CNGL-Leudimin27
ftballfan26
kphoger26
mapman107124
therocket24
cenlaroads23
KEK Inc.21
epzik821
elsmere24121
jp the roadgeek19
sharkyfour19
fwydriver40519
Takumi18
dvferyance17
114
Roadgeekteen14
RyanB0614
cwf170113
SoDakInterstateEnthusiast13
kirbykart13
Streetman13
apeman3312
JMoses2412
ClassicHasClass11
KEVIN_22411
wxfree9
computerfan09
jeffandnicole8
PHLBOS8
TheGrassGuy8
WillWeaverRVA8
bm78
Tarkus7
TheStranger7
Quillz7
Pink Jazz6
DeaconG6
Poiponen136
Skye5
Roadsguy5
Super Mateo4
JoePCool144
SoCal Kid3
LilianaUwU3
Occidental Tourist3
Truvelo2
bzaharin2
Zeffy2
Finrod2
Kulerage2
Aaron Camp2
skquinn2
MCRoads2
snowc2
RoadRebel2
CoolAngrybirdsrio42
Hurricane Rex1
idk1
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: bm7 on April 19, 2024, 01:06:37 AM
I was briefly on AR8 on a trip to see the solar eclipse, so my new number is 15.
Title: Re: Lowest-numbered route you haven't been on
Post by: hotdogPi on April 21, 2024, 12:42:48 PM
MA 14 (just now)
I-15
MA 16
NY 17
MA 18
US 19 (Tampa area)
US 20
MA 21
MA 22
US 23 (Atlanta area)
MA 24
My new lowest is 25.

Once I get that, next is 36 (I have segments of CT 32 and MA 35 too short for Travel Mapping), but it's 25 for now. Maybe I'll take a trip to Portland ME. After 36, each number I get will only advance me by a few rather than a big jump.