Divided highways with weird off grade intersections.

Started by MCRoads, October 07, 2017, 03:31:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

MCRoads

This is a thread about divided highways going over and under an obsticle. Here is an interesting oddity north of Amarillo:

https://goo.gl/maps/1KNRxYYN8vN2

I think the highway had one carriageway, and went under the tracks, but when the road was widens, the underpass couldn't be widened, so they built a bridge over the tracks to save money. Any more of these? Is my theory right?
I build roads on Minecraft. Like, really good roads.
Interstates traveled:
4/5/10*/11**/12**/15/25*/29*/35(E/W[TX])/40*/44**/49(LA**)/55*/64**/65/66*/70°/71*76(PA*,CO*)/78*°/80*/95°/99(PA**,NY**)

*/** indicates a terminus/termini being traveled
° Indicates a gap (I.E Breezwood, PA.)

more room plz


GaryV

There's a configuration like that west of Chelsea, MI on I-94:  https://www.google.com/maps/@42.2946212,-84.0859395,1295m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en

As far as I know, this highway was devised in that manner; both sides were built at the same time.  Old US-12, that the freeway replaced, is about 1/2 mile east of the railroad.

vdeane

The New Jersey Turnpike does this at exit 7; normally, ramps from the car lanes go over the truck lanes, but here the reverse happens, since the truck lanes were added later and exit 7 wasn't rebuilt as part of the project.
https://goo.gl/maps/RdCEguCyfJx
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Tom958

Here's one I thought was cool-looking enough to photograph. This is GA 72 westbound west of Elberton. The lower roadway was built to its current state in the mid '60's, and the higher roadway was added in 1999, IIRC. The new bridge is pretty long as well as high and has T-shaped piers, which looked really cool when it was first built, but the trees in the median are so tall and dense now that you can barely even see the bridge.

TheHighwayMan3561

Quote from: GaryV on October 07, 2017, 04:29:49 PM
There's a configuration like that west of Chelsea, MI on I-94:  https://www.google.com/maps/@42.2946212,-84.0859395,1295m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en

As far as I know, this highway was devised in that manner; both sides were built at the same time.  Old US-12, that the freeway replaced, is about 1/2 mile east of the railroad.


There's another one on I-94 (and 90/39) southeast of Portage, WI. I'm not sure what road is being "  undoverpassed there.
self-certified as the dumbest person on this board for 5 years running


wanderer2575


NE2

Quote from: GaryV on October 07, 2017, 04:29:49 PM
There's a configuration like that west of Chelsea, MI on I-94:  https://www.google.com/maps/@42.2946212,-84.0859395,1295m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en

As far as I know, this highway was devised in that manner; both sides were built at the same time.  Old US-12, that the freeway replaced, is about 1/2 mile east of the railroad.


A 1955 aerial shows only the westbound side existing (as an undivided surface road).
pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

jakeroot

#8
The 405 south of Bellevue, Washington formerly had a grade situation like in the OP. Northbound 405 went over the railway, but southbound 405 went through a tunnel below the railway: https://goo.gl/PwBHLs

The tunnel was built in the 70s, replacing what was originally an underpass beneath the railway. The southbound carriageway was built before the northbound carriageway (in the 40s, as Secondary State Highway 2A). The terrain is quite hilly through there, so when the 405 was built, it must have been decided that a bridge over the railway for the NB carriageway was easier than twinning the original road. The tunnel, and the railway that travelled above it, were eliminated in 2008.

GaryV

Quote from: NE2 on October 08, 2017, 02:21:24 AM
Quote from: GaryV on October 07, 2017, 04:29:49 PM
There's a configuration like that west of Chelsea, MI on I-94:  https://www.google.com/maps/@42.2946212,-84.0859395,1295m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en

As far as I know, this highway was devised in that manner; both sides were built at the same time.  Old US-12, that the freeway replaced, is about 1/2 mile east of the railroad.


A 1955 aerial shows only the westbound side existing (as an undivided surface road).

You are correct.  I didn't realize that the road now known as "Old US Hwy 12" which goes through Chelsea is really the "old-old" route.  Chelsea was bypassed in 1940 with a two-lane routing of US-12, and that roadway was twinned to make I-94.

MCRoads

What about:

https://goo.gl/maps/qmZrUSJuqsx

Which one was built first? I think the bridge was built first, then the tunnel expanded the road to 4 lanes.
I build roads on Minecraft. Like, really good roads.
Interstates traveled:
4/5/10*/11**/12**/15/25*/29*/35(E/W[TX])/40*/44**/49(LA**)/55*/64**/65/66*/70°/71*76(PA*,CO*)/78*°/80*/95°/99(PA**,NY**)

*/** indicates a terminus/termini being traveled
° Indicates a gap (I.E Breezwood, PA.)

more room plz

sparker

There were several of these along CA (former US) 99 in the San Joaquin Valley:  one just south of Famoso (the CA 46 junction), one at CA 198 (the original interchange was built around this split-level separation), one at Chowchilla just north of the CA 152 interchange, and the final example south of Elk Grove just south of the Grant Line Road interchange.  The latter two remain in their original "over/under" format; the other two were replaced by simple twin overpasses on CA 99.  Curiously, the "under" segment at the 99/198 interchange is still in use, functioning as the carriageway for eastbound CA 198. 

NE2

pre-1945 Florida route log

I accept and respect your identity as long as it's not dumb shit like "identifying as a vaccinated attack helicopter".

Michael

Ever since I first saw the over/under bridges of I-81 and PA 307 in 2002 or so, I thought it was weird.  I'm guessing it was built that way due to the terrain.  I can't think of any other over/under bridges I've seen off the top of my head.

cl94

I can think of a couple off the top of my head...

- Taconic State Parkway over NY 129. Parkway here was originally 4 lanes undivided on the right, new alignment built on the left in the late 60s-early 70s when the Taconic was widened to 6 lanes. There are two more in this area, one being at the next interchange north, another south of the reservoir. Both were constructed as such because of the realignment.
- I-80 and I-271 south of Cleveland. This is due to terrain.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

JKRhodes

#15
The Grand Avenue railroad bridges in greater Phoenix have an over/under configuration similar to the OP:

https://goo.gl/maps/y2KLpUByxix

In fact, the entire Grand Ave corridor from I-17 to Surprise has a bevy of unique bridge configurations and partial interchanges, due to an effort undertaken in the early 2000's by ADOT to eliminate busy 6-leg intersections, railroad crossings, and improve overall throughput along the route. In some cases, Grand Ave got the bridge. In others, the major arterial route it crossed got preference depending on need.

The most recent upgrade, which isn't visible on google maps as of right now, is at Bell Road where a new bridge carries Bell over the railroad and Grand Ave. Access between the two roads is via ramps in the median of Grand Ave:
https://www.surpriseaz.gov/3181/Bell-Grand-Interchange-Improvements

BrianP

Quote from: MCRoads on October 07, 2017, 03:31:56 PM
This is a thread about divided highways going over and under an obsticle. Here is an interesting oddity north of Amarillo:

https://goo.gl/maps/1KNRxYYN8vN2

I think the highway had one carriageway, and went under the tracks, but when the road was widens, the underpass couldn't be widened, so they built a bridge over the tracks to save money. Any more of these? Is my theory right?
I'm not sure that money would be the #1 motivator.  I would guess that the #1 motivator is to not disrupt the railway line.  You can do that easier by building a bridge over the railway line than adding a bridge for the railway line to cross. You can certainly do the latter by building a temporary track around where the bridge is built.  But the former sounds cheaper since even a temporary track needs to be able to support the weight of a train. So money would be the #2 motivator IMO. 

If you could disrupt the railway line then avoiding a temporary track and just building a new bridge for the railway line to cross sounds like the cheapest option.  But then again I'm not a rail geek. 

Revive 755

#17
Not related to interchanges

* Two on US 36 in Missouri:  One near Callao, and another near Bucklin

* One in Tennessee between I-40 and TN 299/Airport Road

* One on the West Virginia Turnpike

Related to interchanges
* I-55 has two in East St. Louis, Illinois:  One at the interchange with the MLK Bridge, and another a short distance east at the interchange with I-64 and I-70,.  At both of these the top level of ramps were not part of the original interchanges.

* I-44 at I-55 and Gravois south of Downtown St. Louis

* IIRC, I-40 used to have one east of I-275 in Knoxville, Tennessee

Other
*There's always the western double deck section of US 40 in St. Louis

JREwing78

Quote from: GaryV on October 07, 2017, 04:29:49 PM
There's a configuration like that west of Chelsea, MI on I-94:  https://www.google.com/maps/@42.2946212,-84.0859395,1295m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en

As far as I know, this highway was devised in that manner; both sides were built at the same time.  Old US-12, that the freeway replaced, is about 1/2 mile east of the railroad.


That's OLD-old US-12. Half of the current I-94 (WBD, I believe) between Chelsea and exit 147 near Jackson was an improved 2-lane US-12 originally, then the other carriageway was added later. The WBD side was constructed in the mid-1930's, opening to traffic in 1937. The EBD side was likely constructed in the early 1950's, prior to the 1959 designation of I-94. More: http://www.michiganhighways.org/listings/US-012.html

For the most part, it's invisible, but you'll notice just east of exit 147 the WBD lanes follow the terrain more closely while the EBD lanes are very level. The over-under railroad crossing just west of Chelsea is the other dead giveaway - the WBD underpass (particularly with the steep climb immediately following) is evidence of the route's pre-Interstate heritage. EBD has it's own quirkiness - that sharp right curve immediately east of Kalmbach Rd to obtain sufficient clearance away from the WBD underpass, then a sharp left to come back to the original alignment.

If MDOT was to rebuild this stretch today, it would route all 6 lanes (because traffic definitely warrants it) directly between the existing EBD and WBD lanes as an overpass, with a more gentle curve.

CNGL-Leudimin

The ultimate example of this is A282 East of London, UK :sombrero:.
Supporter of the construction of several running gags, including I-366 with a speed limit of 85 mph (137 km/h) and the Hypotenuse.

Please note that I may mention "invalid" FM channels, i.e. ending in an even number or down to 87.5. These are valid in Europe.

US 81


signalman


Ian

The I-65 and I-20/59 junction in Birmingham, AL has a case similar to the OP. The north/eastbound lanes of I-20/59 go over I-65, while the opposite direction goes under it.

I-376/US 22/US 30 passing the 10th Street Bridge in Pittsburgh, PA is another example. Eastbound traffic passes under the bridge, while westbound passes over.
UMaine graduate, former PennDOT employee, new SoCal resident.
Youtube l Flickr

jakeroot

I wasn't going to post this, but it's in the same vein as many others above me. The 405/518 interchange with the 5 in Tukwila, Washington has a westbound carriageway that goes over the 5, whereas the eastbound carriageway passes beneath the 5. This is simply due to the design of the interchange, with the left-side ramps for various movements, requiring some higher bridges.

See here on Google Maps: https://goo.gl/fSZaRw -- and here on Historic Aerials, back in 1968, around when the junction was built: https://goo.gl/Dq7e5k

GaryV

^ That reminds me of another one.  I-196 goes above (wb) and below (eb) US-131 in Grand Rapids.  At the same location US-131 switches left/right, to create a kind of diverging diamond interchange.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.