News:

Thank you for your patience during the Forum downtime while we upgraded the software. Welcome back and see this thread for some new features and other changes to the forum.

Main Menu

Favorite Games

Started by webny99, March 08, 2021, 05:58:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Scott5114

I'd really like to get better at chess, but I've never managed to find anyone to play with that is about my skill level. Either I completely demolish them or they completely demolish me, neither of which is much fun.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef


webny99

I say about chess the same thing that I've heard some people say about Rook: I'd like to learn how to play it, but it seems fairly complicated, and I don't get it just from watching.

Ned Weasel

Quote from: webny99 on April 16, 2021, 04:42:08 PM
I say about chess the same thing that I've heard some people say about Rook: I'd like to learn how to play it, but it seems fairly complicated, and I don't get it just from watching.

Chess is actually stupidly simple.  Getting good at it is what's complicated!
"I was raised by a cup of coffee." - Strong Bad imitating Homsar

Disclaimer: Views I express are my own and don't reflect any employer or associated entity.

Scott5114

Rook is also pretty simple–it's just a trick-taking game played with non-standard cards. If you're not familiar with the genre, try starting with Whist and, once that becomes old hat, you should find Rook less daunting.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

hotdogPi

Quote from: Scott5114 on April 16, 2021, 06:36:35 PM
Rook is also pretty simple–it's just a trick-taking game played with non-standard cards. If you're not familiar with the genre, try starting with Whist and, once that becomes old hat, you should find Rook less daunting.

It's actually not that nonstandard. You have a fourteenth card in each suit, that's all.
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US 13, 44, 50
MA 22, 40, 107, 109, 117, 119, 126, 141, 159
NH 27, 111A(E); CA 133; NY 366; GA 42, 140; FL A1A, 7; CT 32; VT 2A, 5A; PA 3, 51, 60, QC 162, 165, 263; 🇬🇧A100, A3211, A3213, A3215, A4222; 🇫🇷95 D316

Scott5114

Quote from: 1 on April 16, 2021, 06:49:57 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on April 16, 2021, 06:36:35 PM
Rook is also pretty simple–it's just a trick-taking game played with non-standard cards. If you're not familiar with the genre, try starting with Whist and, once that becomes old hat, you should find Rook less daunting.

It's actually not that nonstandard. You have a fourteenth card in each suit, that's all.

"Non-standard" in this case means a proprietary deck that can only be purchased from one supplier. In the US and England, that'd be any deck that can't be derived from one or more 52-card decks composed of A-K-Q-J-10...2 in diamonds, hearts, clubs, and spades. (Other countries have different standard decks, often with only 32 cards, using different suits, like bells and leaves.)
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

webny99

Quote from: Scott5114 on April 16, 2021, 06:36:35 PM
Rook is also pretty simple–it's just a trick-taking game played with non-standard cards. If you're not familiar with the genre, try starting with Whist and, once that becomes old hat, you should find Rook less daunting.

Yeah, I know - I've played Rook a lot, so I was sort of using that to think about how someone else might feel about my similar take on chess. Rook really isn't that hard, although I do still make an occasional blunder when I don't think things through properly, especially as the bidder. I'd be afraid of doing the same thing in chess.

Scott5114

Catching your opponent in a blunder, and exploiting when your opponent has made a blunder, is basically what all of chess is about.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

webny99

Quote from: Scott5114 on April 16, 2021, 08:03:54 PM
Catching your opponent in a blunder, and exploiting when your opponent has made a blunder, is basically what all of chess is about.

Well, right, and I can't stand the thought of the outcome hinging on a stupid error I made. I know that's part of the fun, but I tend to prefer long games that hinge on the cumulative and can't completely unravel in a single play or two.

Scott5114

Quote from: webny99 on April 16, 2021, 09:46:03 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on April 16, 2021, 08:03:54 PM
Catching your opponent in a blunder, and exploiting when your opponent has made a blunder, is basically what all of chess is about.

Well, right, and I can't stand the thought of the outcome hinging on a stupid error I made. I know that's part of the fun, but I tend to prefer long games that hinge on the cumulative and can't completely unravel in a single play or two.

Can't argue with that. It can be really satisfying when you make a mistake, catch your error, and manage to successfully recover.
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

JayhawkCO

Just picked up three new ones for my gaming group.

Azul - Super light, easy to teach to anyone, deceptively strategic
Wingspan - A little more involved, among the prettiest games I've ever seen, I think this one would appeal to most
Brass: Birmingham - A lot heavier, but easily the best game of the bunch

Chris

JayhawkCO

I know this is an old thread, but no need to start a new one.  I've been playing a ton of Age of Steam lately and since I know there are a lot of railfans on this site too, I was curious if anyone else had ever played any train games.

Max Rockatansky

I referenced board games in my original post.  If I was to pick a video game the one I always find my way back to is Doom, Doom II and Final Doom.  The original games are so well designed and there is so much community WAD maps to load up for new experiences.  I never really got into the source port stuff or Brutal Doom much.

allniter89

Backgammon or poker, either in person or online, no keepsies
BUY AMERICAN MADE.
SPEED SAFELY.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.