Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Roadgeekteen]

Take it somewhere else. It's exausting and distressing.

[kphoger]

But what about the high tariff on putty these days?

[Roadgeekteen]

But what about the high tariff on putty these days?

Call your local congressman 

[Max Rockatansky]

But what about the high tariff on putty these days?

Call your local congressman 

Introduce a bill to the New York State Senate to censor MMM. 

[Rothman]

Take it somewhere else. It's exausting and distressing.

You don't have to participate in the threads where people mention it.

[Roadgeekteen]

Take it somewhere else. It's exausting and distressing.

You don't have to participate in the threads where people mention it.

I know. But we have bans on things like political and religious postings for a reason

[Big John]

But what about the high tariff on putty these days?

Call your local congressman 

Introduce a bill to the New York State Senate to censor MMM. 

Constitution prohibits bills of attainer and provides equal protection under the law, though 1995hoo cis more the expert on the subject.  If mmm was in the senate, it would be easier to censure him.

[kalvado]

But what about the high tariff on putty these days?

Call your local congressman 

Introduce a bill to the New York State Senate to censor MMM. 

Constitution prohibits bills of attainer and provides equal protection under the law, though 1995hoo cis more the expert on the subject.  If mmm was in the senate, it would be easier to censure him.

Sounds like a plan - lets elect MMM to the office and then censure him!

[Max Rockatansky]

But what about the high tariff on putty these days?

Call your local congressman 

Introduce a bill to the New York State Senate to censor MMM. 

Constitution prohibits bills of attainer and provides equal protection under the law, though 1995hoo cis more the expert on the subject.  If mmm was in the senate, it would be easier to censure him.

Ah, you see I was aiming for "censoring" MMM.  It might run into some Constitutional issues, but it's worth a shot to hope there is no Federal appeal (given MMM doesn't vote it seems unlikely).

Also, I found MMM IRL:

[Scott5114]

Take it somewhere else. It's exausting and distressing.

You don't have to participate in the threads where people mention it.

I know. But we have bans on things like political and religious postings for a reason

The main reason for those bans is because they tend to lead to arguments that don't end. You will never turn a Republican into a Democrat, or a Catholic into a Protestant or a Muslim, by posting on a Web forum. All it does is result in people eventually getting each other mad.

Not everyone like discussing heavy topics, but I sure hope nobody is in favor of child abuse and wants to get people against it worked up about it.  If you don't want to discuss a topic that's too serious, you can choose to not post in or read threads discussing it.

[Roadgeekteen]

Take it somewhere else. It's exausting and distressing.

You don't have to participate in the threads where people mention it.

I know. But we have bans on things like political and religious postings for a reason

The main reason for those bans is because they tend to lead to arguments that don't end. You will never turn a Republican into a Democrat, or a Catholic into a Protestant or a Muslim, by posting on a Web forum. All it does is result in people eventually getting each other mad.

Not everyone like discussing heavy topics, but I sure hope nobody is in favor of child abuse and wants to get people against it worked up about it.  If you don't want to discuss a topic that's too serious, you can choose to not post in or read threads discussing it.

I understand. Although the MMM threads have led into serious arguements about what counts as child abuse. And daylight savings threads have been locked. Of course nobody supports child abuse, but MMM is stretching the definition of it. But I'm not really in favor of putting in more rules, I just want people to know that at least I, and I'm guessing others, don't enjoy talking about these subjects and seeing it on our forum.

[Scott5114]

Take it somewhere else. It's exausting and distressing.

You don't have to participate in the threads where people mention it.

I know. But we have bans on things like political and religious postings for a reason

The main reason for those bans is because they tend to lead to arguments that don't end. You will never turn a Republican into a Democrat, or a Catholic into a Protestant or a Muslim, by posting on a Web forum. All it does is result in people eventually getting each other mad.

Not everyone like discussing heavy topics, but I sure hope nobody is in favor of child abuse and wants to get people against it worked up about it.  If you don't want to discuss a topic that's too serious, you can choose to not post in or read threads discussing it.

I understand. Although the MMM threads have led into serious arguements about what counts as child abuse. And daylight savings threads have been locked. Of course nobody supports child abuse, but MMM is stretching the definition of it. But I'm not really in favor of putting in more rules, I just want people to know that at least I, and I'm guessing others, don't enjoy talking about these subjects and seeing it on our forum.

The main reason for daylight savings threads being locked is because they tend to lead to arguments that don't end.

[kalvado]

Take it somewhere else. It's exausting and distressing.

You don't have to participate in the threads where people mention it.

I know. But we have bans on things like political and religious postings for a reason

The main reason for those bans is because they tend to lead to arguments that don't end. You will never turn a Republican into a Democrat, or a Catholic into a Protestant or a Muslim, by posting on a Web forum. All it does is result in people eventually getting each other mad.

Not everyone like discussing heavy topics, but I sure hope nobody is in favor of child abuse and wants to get people against it worked up about it.  If you don't want to discuss a topic that's too serious, you can choose to not post in or read threads discussing it.

I understand. Although the MMM threads have led into serious arguements about what counts as child abuse. And daylight savings threads have been locked. Of course nobody supports child abuse, but MMM is stretching the definition of it. But I'm not really in favor of putting in more rules, I just want people to know that at least I, and I'm guessing others, don't enjoy talking about these subjects and seeing it on our forum.

The main reason for daylight savings threads being locked is because they tend to lead to arguments that don't end.

Or, 8f you will, MMM is skillfully throwing new topics into his dumpsters to keep dying fire going.
Biggest nonstop one is "what to do with MMM" actually....

[thspfc]

What an announcement

[roadman65]

MMM is gone until he comes up with a new alias and trolls again.

[Roadgeekteen]

Why is this thread back

[roadman65]

Who knows. This is AA Roads remember.