News:

Thank you for your patience during the Forum downtime while we upgraded the software. Welcome back and see this thread for some new features and other changes to the forum.

Main Menu

The Wildfires thread

Started by bing101, September 08, 2022, 10:21:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ted$8roadFan

Due to lack of significant rainfall for the past few weeks, New England is now the subject of red flag warnings and experiencing wildfires. Highly unusual for this area.


Rothman

Quote from: Ted$8roadFan on November 02, 2024, 04:05:16 PMDue to lack of significant rainfall for the past few weeks, New England is now the subject of red flag warnings and experiencing wildfires. Highly unusual for this area.

To be fair, most of the Lower 48 is experiencing a drought right now...except for around Syracuse, NY:

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position(s) of NYSDOT.


bing101


bing101

Wildfire forces evacuations in Malibu, California; students shelter in place - https://www.reuters.com/world/us/wildfire-forces-evacuations-malibu-california-students-shelter-place-2024-12-10/

This is a preliminary report.

Max Rockatansky

Is Malibu ever not on fire anymore?

bing101



bing101


kernals12

This brings to mind the Bel Air fire of 1961 which burned 6,000 acres and destroyed almost 500 homes, many belonging to celebrities.


bing101


bing101

#311

Here is an update

Max Rockatansky

The scale of where the fire has hit is tracked on the CalFire webpage.  Lots of gulches burned between subdivisions:

https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents

kernals12

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 04:35:40 PMThe scale of where the fire has hit is tracked on the CalFire webpage.  Lots of gulches burned between subdivisions:

https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents

I wonder how many of the destroyed homes were built before LA banned wood shingle roofs in the 60s. Look at how The Summit, a relative recent development, is completely unaffected

bing101

https://www.livenowfox.com/news/trump-blames-newsom-apocalyptic-california-wildfires
Interestingly Trump inserts himself and Newsom with the Los Angeles area wildfires.

Max Rockatansky

Quote from: kernals12 on January 08, 2025, 04:57:05 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 04:35:40 PMThe scale of where the fire has hit is tracked on the CalFire webpage.  Lots of gulches burned between subdivisions:

https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents

I wonder how many of the destroyed homes were built before LA banned wood shingle roofs in the 60s. Look at how The Summit, a relative recent development, is completely unaffected

Fair chance of that.  There is a lot of older structures in that area. 

kernals12

So what's the issue with the hydrants? Do they not have enough water stored up or is the pumping equipment not able to handle this much demand at once?

ET21

Quote from: bing101 on January 08, 2025, 03:22:37 PMhttps://apnews.com/live/live-updates-wildfire-los-angeles-palisades


It's being updated to mention largest fire in LA City history.

Gonna be more then that when all is said and done. Could be the costliest wildfire ever in US history.
The local weatherman, trust me I can be 99.9% right!
"Show where you're going, without forgetting where you're from"

Clinched:
IL: I-88, I-180, I-190, I-290, I-294, I-355, IL-390
IN: I-80, I-94
SD: I-190
WI: I-90
MI: I-94, I-196
MN: I-90

Max Rockatansky

I can't help but question the amount of media coverage this is getting compared to when Paradise burned down. 

kkt

Quote from: bing101 on January 08, 2025, 05:06:24 PMhttps://www.livenowfox.com/news/trump-blames-newsom-apocalyptic-california-wildfires
Interestingly Trump inserts himself and Newsom with the Los Angeles area wildfires.

Right, because California never had fires until Newsom was governor.  (Oh, wait...)

kernals12

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 06:36:38 PMI can't help but question the amount of media coverage this is getting compared to when Paradise burned down. 

It's simple: a lot more people are impacted.

Max Rockatansky

Quote from: kernals12 on January 08, 2025, 07:54:44 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 06:36:38 PMI can't help but question the amount of media coverage this is getting compared to when Paradise burned down. 

It's simple: a lot more people are impacted.

85 died from the Camp Fire.  It was the most deadly fire in state history.

kalvado

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 08:31:16 PM
Quote from: kernals12 on January 08, 2025, 07:54:44 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 06:36:38 PMI can't help but question the amount of media coverage this is getting compared to when Paradise burned down. 

It's simple: a lot more people are impacted.

85 died from the Camp Fire.  It was the most deadly fire in state history.
They were not shot, so they don't matter. Insurance losses would be higher in CA, and that is more important.

Max Rockatansky

Quote from: kalvado on January 08, 2025, 08:38:37 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 08:31:16 PM
Quote from: kernals12 on January 08, 2025, 07:54:44 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 06:36:38 PMI can't help but question the amount of media coverage this is getting compared to when Paradise burned down. 

It's simple: a lot more people are impacted.

85 died from the Camp Fire.  It was the most deadly fire in state history.
They were not shot, so they don't matter. Insurance losses would be higher in CA, and that is more important.

I had a quick at CNN to see what the headlines were.  They led off their coverage with a list of celebrity homes burned and property damage dollar figure estimates.  No mention of current fatality figures or estimates on how people are displaced. 

kernals12

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 08:43:11 PM
Quote from: kalvado on January 08, 2025, 08:38:37 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 08:31:16 PM
Quote from: kernals12 on January 08, 2025, 07:54:44 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on January 08, 2025, 06:36:38 PMI can't help but question the amount of media coverage this is getting compared to when Paradise burned down. 

It's simple: a lot more people are impacted.

85 died from the Camp Fire.  It was the most deadly fire in state history.
They were not shot, so they don't matter. Insurance losses would be higher in CA, and that is more important.

I had a quick at CNN to see what the headlines were.  They led off their coverage with a list of celebrity homes burned and property damage dollar figure estimates.  No mention of current fatality figures or estimates on how people are displaced. 
The New York Times has made the displacements their main headline



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.