News:

Needing some php assistance with the script on the main AARoads site. Please contact Alex if you would like to help or provide advice!

Main Menu

NY 17/"I-86"

Started by newyorker478, October 27, 2011, 07:54:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

empirestate

Quote from: vdeane on September 29, 2017, 07:23:49 PM
Quote from: Mergingtraffic on September 29, 2017, 02:52:43 PM
Quote from: vdeane on September 29, 2017, 12:59:21 PM
There was an image on the project website; not sure if can still be dug up or not.

I had a hard time finding anything.  Good luck
https://www.dot.ny.gov/portal/page/portal/regional-offices/region9/projects/nys-rte17-hale_eddy-hancock/visualizations

Was that alternative eventually selected? Did they complete the EIS? That page dates from 2010, and my recollection is that things pretty much stalled out at that stage.


kalvado

Quote from: vdeane on September 29, 2017, 07:23:49 PM
Quote from: Mergingtraffic on September 29, 2017, 02:52:43 PM
Quote from: vdeane on September 29, 2017, 12:59:21 PM
There was an image on the project website; not sure if can still be dug up or not.

I had a hard time finding anything.  Good luck
https://www.dot.ny.gov/portal/page/portal/regional-offices/region9/projects/nys-rte17-hale_eddy-hancock/visualizations


Thank you!
But this is exactly what looks impossible at a first glance - running a local road on the north side of a highway. My impression is that it has to involve a lot of rock blasting - aka moving the mountain...

empirestate

Quote from: kalvado on September 30, 2017, 09:07:49 AM
Quote from: vdeane on September 29, 2017, 07:23:49 PM
Quote from: Mergingtraffic on September 29, 2017, 02:52:43 PM
Quote from: vdeane on September 29, 2017, 12:59:21 PM
There was an image on the project website; not sure if can still be dug up or not.

I had a hard time finding anything.  Good luck
https://www.dot.ny.gov/portal/page/portal/regional-offices/region9/projects/nys-rte17-hale_eddy-hancock/visualizations


Thank you!
But this is exactly what looks impossible at a first glance - running a local road on the north side of a highway. My impression is that it has to involve a lot of rock blasting - aka moving the mountain...

It's not really that steep or crowded through there; there's already plenty of private property with improvements on the north side of the highway.

Roadgeek Adam

The question is the purpose. The section has had dwindling traffic numbers (9000s in 2009, 7000s in 2014). Is it worth bulldozing property and spending money on something where an accident isn't likely?
Adam Seth Moss
M.A. History, Western Illinois University 2015-17
B.A. History, Montclair State University 2013-15
A.A. History & Education - Middlesex (County) College 2009-13

Rothman

Quote from: JJBers on September 29, 2017, 04:40:58 PM
Why can't NYDOT pull a Breezewood and designate I-86 fully now. It's only a few random intersections in the middle of nowhere.

Because FHWA NY's Division would not allow it.

I posted a list of the remaining projects to be done and a personal estimate of how much they cost some time ago and the list has not changed since I posted it.

...

Had to laugh at seicer's post that since design is done, "all" that is needed is the funding for construction.  Oh, is that all?  Construction is just 70%+ of the total cost of projects. 

That is my continuing point:  With nine digits of cost left to do the full conversions, the cost is just not justified.  Heck, one NYSDOT Commissioner drove down NY 17 and thought the conversion should be taken off the table forever, not just delayed.

Keep waiting all you want, but it is going to be over a decade to see the entire conversion through, if not years more.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position(s) of NYSDOT.

JJBers

Quote from: Rothman on September 30, 2017, 08:13:00 PM
Keep waiting all you want, but it is going to be over a decade to see the entire conversion through, if not years more.
Well, I guess it took 40-60 years to fully complete I-90...so I guess we can wait.
*for Connecticut
Clinched Stats,
Flickr,
(2di:I-24, I-76, I-80, I-84, I-95 [ME-GA], I-91)

roadman65

Quote from: JJBers on September 30, 2017, 11:59:41 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 30, 2017, 08:13:00 PM
Keep waiting all you want, but it is going to be over a decade to see the entire conversion through, if not years more.
Well, I guess it took 40-60 years to fully complete I-90...so I guess we can wait.
I-95 is still not completed as well.  That is one of the originals as well.
Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe

jp the roadgeek

Quote from: roadman65 on October 01, 2017, 04:17:35 AM
Quote from: JJBers on September 30, 2017, 11:59:41 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 30, 2017, 08:13:00 PM
Keep waiting all you want, but it is going to be over a decade to see the entire conversion through, if not years more.
Well, I guess it took 40-60 years to fully complete I-90...so I guess we can wait.
I-95 is still not completed as well.  That is one of the originals as well.
And who knows when I-69 will ever be completed.
Interstates I've clinched: 97, 290 (MA), 291 (CT), 291 (MA), 293, 295 (DE-NJ-PA), 295 (RI-MA), 384, 391, 395 (CT-MA), 395 (MD), 495 (DE), 610 (LA), 684, 691, 695 (MD), 695 (NY), 795 (MD)

Alps

Quote from: jp the roadgeek on October 01, 2017, 10:45:25 AM
Quote from: roadman65 on October 01, 2017, 04:17:35 AM
Quote from: JJBers on September 30, 2017, 11:59:41 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 30, 2017, 08:13:00 PM
Keep waiting all you want, but it is going to be over a decade to see the entire conversion through, if not years more.
Well, I guess it took 40-60 years to fully complete I-90...so I guess we can wait.
I-95 is still not completed as well.  That is one of the originals as well.
And who knows when I-69 will ever be completed.
But it has to be! It was legislated! </I-73 and I-74>

sparker

Quote from: Alps on October 01, 2017, 12:21:43 PM
Quote from: jp the roadgeek on October 01, 2017, 10:45:25 AM
Quote from: roadman65 on October 01, 2017, 04:17:35 AM
Quote from: JJBers on September 30, 2017, 11:59:41 PM
Quote from: Rothman on September 30, 2017, 08:13:00 PM
Keep waiting all you want, but it is going to be over a decade to see the entire conversion through, if not years more.
Well, I guess it took 40-60 years to fully complete I-90...so I guess we can wait.
I-95 is still not completed as well.  That is one of the originals as well.
And who knows when I-69 will ever be completed.
But it has to be! It was legislated! </I-73 and I-74>

Two words:  Unfunded Mandates!!!

cl94

The Quickway has several substandard ramps and RIROs, including "Exit 111" in eastern Sullivan County. Those will cost more to upgrade simply because of the amount of development, especially in Orange County. 2030 is an optimistic estimate.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

compdude787

Quote from: cl94 on October 03, 2017, 09:38:17 PM
The Quickway has several substandard ramps and RIROs, including "Exit 111" in eastern Sullivan County. Those will cost more to upgrade simply because of the amount of development, especially in Orange County. 2030 is an optimistic estimate.

Seems like they could just close that exit because there's a road running alongside NY 17 that connects it with exit 110.

seicer

There are several exits that could and should be closed for that reason.

cl94

Quote from: compdude787 on October 04, 2017, 02:03:30 AM
Quote from: cl94 on October 03, 2017, 09:38:17 PM
The Quickway has several substandard ramps and RIROs, including "Exit 111" in eastern Sullivan County. Those will cost more to upgrade simply because of the amount of development, especially in Orange County. 2030 is an optimistic estimate.

Seems like they could just close that exit because there's a road running alongside NY 17 that connects it with exit 110.

They've been trying for 10 years. The gas station at the RIRO has been fighting it and the residents around 110 don't want the increased traffic.

Quote from: seicer on October 04, 2017, 08:54:24 AM
There are several exits that could and should be closed for that reason.

Not as many as one would think, but yes, there are a few. 127-129 stick out there- you could probably close the three of them. Not like any have access to/from the west (except 129, which is on top of 130 with an access road connecting them). Likewise, 125 is on top of the more-useful 124.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

Strider

Are they planning on signing I-86 from its temporary ending to I-81 anytime soon?

cl94

Quote from: Strider on October 04, 2017, 11:59:04 AM
Are they planning on signing I-86 from its temporary ending to I-81 anytime soon?

Yes, when they're done with the work in Binghamton. That's the holdup at this point.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

vdeane

I think there's possibility of moving exit 125 if the Legoland thing goes through.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

cl94

Quote from: vdeane on October 04, 2017, 01:57:52 PM
I think there's possibility of moving exit 125 if the Legoland thing goes through.

Legoland Goshen is almost a done deal at this point. They have most of the necessary approvals. Just need to build the thing.
Please note: All posts represent my personal opinions and do not represent those of my employer or any of its partner agencies.

Travel Mapping (updated weekly)

JJBers

Quote from: cl94 on October 04, 2017, 04:18:35 PM
Quote from: vdeane on October 04, 2017, 01:57:52 PM
I think there's possibility of moving exit 125 if the Legoland thing goes through.

Legoland Goshen is almost a done deal at this point. They have most of the necessary approvals. Just need to build the thing.
Well, that makes a Legoland 150 miles away instead of 1350 miles away.
*for Connecticut
Clinched Stats,
Flickr,
(2di:I-24, I-76, I-80, I-84, I-95 [ME-GA], I-91)

GreenLanternCorps

Quote from: cl94 on October 04, 2017, 12:02:43 PM
Quote from: Strider on October 04, 2017, 11:59:04 AM
Are they planning on signing I-86 from its temporary ending to I-81 anytime soon?

Yes, when they're done with the work in Binghamton. That's the holdup at this point.

So, if Google maps is correct, when the I-81/I-86 construction is done, I-86 will be continuous from I-90 to Windsor, NY at the NY-79 interchange?

Rothman

Quote from: GreenLanternCorps on October 27, 2017, 02:54:39 PM
Quote from: cl94 on October 04, 2017, 12:02:43 PM
Quote from: Strider on October 04, 2017, 11:59:04 AM
Are they planning on signing I-86 from its temporary ending to I-81 anytime soon?

Yes, when they're done with the work in Binghamton. That's the holdup at this point.

So, if Google maps is correct, when the I-81/I-86 construction is done, I-86 will be continuous from I-90 to Windsor, NY at the NY-79 interchange?
I don't believe so.  Still conversion work to be done east of Elmira.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position(s) of NYSDOT.

sparker

Quote from: Rothman on October 29, 2017, 05:32:16 PM
Quote from: GreenLanternCorps on October 27, 2017, 02:54:39 PM
Quote from: cl94 on October 04, 2017, 12:02:43 PM
Quote from: Strider on October 04, 2017, 11:59:04 AM
Are they planning on signing I-86 from its temporary ending to I-81 anytime soon?

Yes, when they're done with the work in Binghamton. That's the holdup at this point.

So, if Google maps is correct, when the I-81/I-86 construction is done, I-86 will be continuous from I-90 to Windsor, NY at the NY-79 interchange?
I don't believe so.  Still conversion work to be done east of Elmira.

How far east of Elmira?  It's apparently OK and signed east to Waverly/US 220, so any substandard sections would have to be east of there in the segment through Owego and Vestal.  Any word on current or pending projects along that stretch?

Rothman

There might be one more upgrade project on NY 17, actually, between the Tioga County line and Prospect Mountain/Kamikaze Curve.  Not sure if that's all been incorporated into the Prospect Mountain project.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position(s) of NYSDOT.

vdeane

I think I remember hearing that I-86 would be signed on the conclusion of the project, so maybe it got rolled in.
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

GenExpwy

#99
The reference markers on the Allegany Reservation have been switched back to " 17 " , because the Senecas refuse to recognize I-86.

http://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/state-dot-crews-replace-mile-markers-with-signs/article_70ea19b0-bb86-11e7-a8c9-b7c2c4cf4d20.html



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.