DE 30 is looking at a pretty significant truncation within the next couple months, everything southwest of Millsboro is getting deleted. Most of the to-be-deleted portion of DE 30 consists of relatively untouched rural back roads, however the proposed changes do leave an awkward 0.9mi stretch of Millsboro Highway unsigned between DE 24 / 26.
DelDOT Truncation Study
Delaware state route system changes over the last 30 plus years:
1988 - SR 2 Business in Newark established
1991 - SR 20 extended east from Millsboro to SR 54, and then alongside SR 54 to SR 1
1993 - SR 286 added
1993 - SR 15 extended north to Summit Bridge
1994 - SR 30 extended south
1995 - SR 1D designated
1995 - SR 7 extended south from Red Lion over what was U.S. 13 to Wrangle Hill.
2004 - SR 54 ALT established
2008 - SR 24 ALT recommended
2019 - US 301 / First Responders Memorial Highway completed
2004 - U.S. 113 truncated north of Milford, 2.29 miles of Bay Road decertified as a numbered route
2014 - SR 2 Business decommissioned, SR 2 truncated, SR 279 established
2017 - SR 24 ALT all signs removed along the 17.7 mile long route
2019 - SR 34 decommissioned. The route was 3.30 miles long.
2019 - 0.84 mile section of Middletown Warwick Road that was U.S. 301 decertified as a numbered route
2019 - SR 54 ALT all signs removed along the 8.5 mile long route
In an effort to increase safety and enhance mobility along rural roadways in Delaware, DelDOT’s Traffic Engineering Section is proposing the partial removal of the SR 30 designation in south-central Sussex County due to the complex, tangled nature of its routing amongst SRs 24, 26, and 54.
Ah yes, safety and mobility, the key words used by DOT's to justify just about any proposal.
Less numbered routes for motorists enhances mobility? How so? Seems to me that it is better to disperse traffic among multiple routes, even if slightly (given the low traffic counts of SR 30), then to consolidate it on less routes.
Edit, was texting with Bob about this and he indicated that decertifying it has to do with maintenance allocation, as posted state routes are higher priority. Thus delist SR 30 and the roads that were along it move down the chain vs. other routes. It also has to do with GPS sending vehicles too large for local conditions over certain roads.The tangled concurrencies amongst SRs 24, 26, 30, and 54 in southern Sussex County are a source of motorist confusion and sign clutter, and the declassification of SR 30 in this area will eliminate many of these issues.
How many complaints and emails do you think they received about the overlaps? I bet one or none.
DelDOT previously was all about "removing braided routes" when they justified truncating U.S. 113. Higher in priority with addressing sign clutter/confusion in the system could be addressing some of these overlaps:
SR 896 south from Glasgow alongside SR 71 to Mt. Pleasant.
The turn of SR 896 south at Hillside Road has not been marked since 2012. Truncate SR 896 at SR 71 and renumber the east-west leg from Mt. Pleasant to Boyds Corner or decertify it. Or realign SR 71 northeast from Lums Pond over SR 896 to SR 4 in Newark.
The north end of SR 71 may be realigned or truncated due to planned improvements at the exchange joining U.S. 13 and SR 1 at Tybouts Corner.SR 18 remains alongside SR 404 east to Georgetown, without an independent section east of Cannon Road near Bridgeville. SR 404 was cosigned with SR 18 by 1987, it is likely that motorists are used to the number by now...
The poorly signed overlap of SR 1/7 joins two distinctly separate sections. Per what Bob told me, DelDOT considers the SR 1 designation as still extending north to the exchange with SR 58, despite the end sign posted beyond the Road A overpass by Christiana Mall. SR 7 through Christiana should be dropped, but Bob also told me something about it SR 7 remaining there because of the Christiana Fire Company.
The SR 100 overlaps with SR 48 and SR 141 could be done away with at this point and SR 100 dropped or renumbered to two separate routes.
Is the continuity of SR 2 along the overlap with SR 72 west to SR 273 in Newark really needed at this point?
Not a big fan personally of those overlaps with SR 24, 26 and 54, however the east-west leg could be retained as a different numbered route, and as Alps suggested, the 0.92 mile long segment of Millsboro Highway be designated as something new.
SR 30 has no shoulders between Bi-State Boulevard and Millsboro Highway, whereas SR 24, SR 26, and SR 54 have full-width shoulders.
SR 9 almost entirely has no shoulders between Smyrna Leipsic Road and Port Penn. SR 15 has long sections in southern New Castle County with no shoulders and several more in Kent County. SR 82 has no shoulders (DelDOT unsuccessfully tried to decommission SR 82 in 2010). SR 100 has no shoulders from just north of SR 141 to the PA line, and also along the four lane section of Dupont Road between a point just north of SR 4 at Richardson Park and SR 48 in Wilmington. So there are already exceptions in the system.
DelDOT is proposing to declassify approximately 22 miles of SR 30 in south-central Sussex County, from Bi-State Boulevard (ALT US 13 between Laurel and Delmar)
U.S. 13 ALT on Bi-State Boulevard? What data is DelDOT using?
The Delaware State Highway Department proposed designating Bi-State Boulevard as U.S. 13 ALT initially in 1952. AASHO deferred approving it pending action by the state of Maryland.
In 1955, AASHO disallowed the establishment of U.S. 13 ALT between the state line and a point north of Seaford, instead suggesting the use of a business route. With no further action by either state, a bannered route for U.S. 13 was never formally established along Bi-State Boulevard, and the 1957-58 Official Delaware Highway Map removed U.S. 13 ALT between Delmar and Laurel.
SR 30’s new southern terminus would be at SR 24 (John J Williams Highway) in Millsboro, therefore the entirety of the route would connect the City of Milford and Town of Millsboro.
So the entire extension of SR 30 made by 1994 would be dropped.
Declassifying SR 30 between Bi-State Boulevard and Gravel Hill Road may encourage long-distance travelers and trucks to use SRs 24, 26, and 54 instead, reducing volumes on SR 30.
Similar verbiage was written about declassifying SR 34 (which in turn was marked as one of the alternate routes to Wilmington due to the I-95 viaduct construction).
Traffic counts on SR 30 were just 1,881 in 2019 east of U.S. 13 and just 1,141 west of SR 26. How much lower is preferable?
Lastly, Bob mentioned some discussion to me that in Milford SR 30 might get extended north over SR 1 Business, with SR 1 Business decommissioned. This would coincide with the removal of the wye interchange joining SR 1 with SR 1 Business on Rehoboth Boulevard. Has something to do with access to the Bayhealth Hospital built on SR 30 by the exchange with SR 1.