I restored the forum, but some functionality may not work, and errors may still occur. I'll do further debugging as needed...
-Alex
Quote from: Scott5114 on Today at 08:19:02 AMQuote from: vdeane on March 10, 2025, 08:26:52 PMNew I-55 & Trump interchange in Memphis
I am honestly a little surprised that a large red-state city has not named a major street after him. (Sure, even in red states, cities tend to be on the blue side, but there are exceptions, like Oklahoma City.)
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on Today at 10:28:02 AMIf said pocket universe started breaking down and all dimensions collapsed, wouldn't that not render it flat?
Quote from: Elm on January 13, 2025, 11:17:51 PMRe: 2nd Colorado Buc-ee's: A few of our local NIMBY groups are headlining a lawsuit against Palmer Lake over deeming the potential Buc-ee's site eligible for annexation. (KOAA article, but all the news outlets have a version).
The Town of Palmer Lake released this response.
Guess they'll throw up complaints at every stage of the process. This part is eligibility for annexation, Buc-ee's or not. Still to come are the actual annexation, development plan, etc.
Personally, while I like this site for myself, I agree with Bobby5280 that north Pueblo would be a good alternative if it falls through. There's a void between Pueblo and Colorado Springs with the Piñon rest stop and truck stop closed.
Quote from: sprjus4 on Today at 12:41:15 PMQuote from: Bobby5280 on Today at 11:55:38 AMI don't know if I-37 would be a good enough candidate to have 80mph speed limits. It's an older highway. A bunch of its on/off ramp designs aren't so great for acceleration to or deceleration from 80mph speeds.It's an older highway, but it's flat and wide open for virtually its entire length outside of San Antonio and Corpus Christi. Most traffic is comfortably moving 80+ mph.
QuoteI understand the ramp design concern, but if Texas is okay with a two lane road with at-grade intersections, turn offs, etc. being 75 mph, I can't see why a 5 mph bump on a limited access freeway with low volume ramps is the breaking point.
Quote from: Scott5114 on Today at 01:39:03 AMRemember that episode of Star Trek where Dr. Crusher was trapped in a collapsing pocket universe? Anyway, that's what I imagine living in Illinois is like.
Quote from: Sub-Urbanite on Today at 03:12:35 PMThe light rail would help with that, but there seems to be a large contingent of people who are ideologically opposed to using any mode other than driving. I can understand it with us roadgeeks, but not with everyone else, at least not when it gets to the point of improving other modes to fix the things that currently make driving much more appealing. It's as if people like being stuck in congestion (while one can argue about most places, at least for the short/medium term, we also see these battles in places like NYC where nobody in their right mind would argue that congestion can be resolved entirely with car infrastructure).
- It has to make the environmentally-conscious Oregon governments happy, which means it has to have both light rail and a minimal amount of car lanes (right now 3 through, 1 aux) and decent bike/ped facilities
- But it has to also make Clark County happy, and people there are overwhelmingly driving to Portland when they commute