News:

Needing some php assistance with the script on the main AARoads site. Please contact Alex if you would like to help or provide advice!

Main Menu

Unique, Odd, or Interesting Signs aka The good, the bad, and the ugly

Started by mass_citizen, December 04, 2013, 10:46:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

mrcmc888

Quote from: cjk374 on March 21, 2018, 06:55:57 AM
Quote from: US71 on March 20, 2018, 10:53:44 PM
Quote from: formulanone on March 20, 2018, 10:42:33 PM
Quote from: US71 on March 20, 2018, 09:31:28 PM
I retraced part of the roadmeet on Sunday to get this:




Inverted colors, interesting.

The overall design is more like an exit sign shield.

It is indeed. Maybe it's because I am a Louisianian, but this goes in my definition of "worst of". I have never liked these exit ramp shields.

But it gets worse than this nowadays. Just wait til I get shots of what has been put up lately by DOTD.
I agree with you...I have never liked JCT shields on exit ramps.  They're more than a little redundant.


roadman65

Quote from: roadman65 on March 20, 2018, 04:54:19 PM
https://www.flickr.com/photos/54480415@N08/40926526931/in/dateposted-public/

What is interesting about this one is the fact that FL 437 is only one city block long concurrent with FL 438.  The only reason its here is because just ahead FL 437 becomes County Road 437 and where this sign is located is state maintained for this very short overlap.
Actually I found something else interesting about these shields.  The arrows beneath them, although common in some areas, this one has FL 438 turn beyond it as well as FL 437 end ahead.  So really this could be erroneous in another way.
Every day is a winding road, you just got to get used to it.

Sheryl Crowe

cjk374

Quote from: mrcmc888 on March 22, 2018, 12:34:51 PM
Quote from: cjk374 on March 21, 2018, 06:55:57 AM
Quote from: US71 on March 20, 2018, 10:53:44 PM
Quote from: formulanone on March 20, 2018, 10:42:33 PM
Quote from: US71 on March 20, 2018, 09:31:28 PM
I retraced part of the roadmeet on Sunday to get this:




Inverted colors, interesting.

The overall design is more like an exit sign shield.

It is indeed. Maybe it's because I am a Louisianian, but this goes in my definition of "worst of". I have never liked these exit ramp shields.

But it gets worse than this nowadays. Just wait til I get shots of what has been put up lately by DOTD.
I agree with you...I have never liked JCT shields on exit ramps.  They're more than a little redundant.

This sign is on LA 1. We don't have JCT banners on our exit ramps. I have no idea why DOTD put these signs at this intersection (both directions).

Who puts JCT bannered signs on exit ramps?
Runnin' roads and polishin' rails.

US71

Quote from: cjk374 on March 23, 2018, 05:26:51 PM


This sign is on LA 1. We don't have JCT banners on our exit ramps. I have no idea why DOTD put these signs at this intersection (both directions).


My guess is it was an independent contractor when the road was 4-Laned. Contractor signs are often "different" &/or ugly
Like Alice I Try To Believe Three Impossible Things Before Breakfast

Eth




US71

Like Alice I Try To Believe Three Impossible Things Before Breakfast

cjk374

Quote from: US71 on March 23, 2018, 10:01:41 PM
Something worse than the 169 sign  :o  :-D


You noticed how that ugly thing was gone when you were here last week right?
Runnin' roads and polishin' rails.

US71

Quote from: cjk374 on March 23, 2018, 10:13:12 PM
Quote from: US71 on March 23, 2018, 10:01:41 PM
Something worse than the 169 sign  :o  :-D


You noticed how that ugly thing was gone when you were here last week right?

Been gone about 8 years, I think.
Like Alice I Try To Believe Three Impossible Things Before Breakfast

jakeroot


Max Rockatansky

Quote from: jakeroot on March 24, 2018, 12:27:30 AM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on March 23, 2018, 09:29:40 PM
Quote from: mrpablue on March 23, 2018, 06:53:35 PM
What's up with this END SR152 sign at I-5?

https://www.google.com/maps/@37.0566381,-120.9722302,3a,75y,110.19h,91.66t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFiajF2xjERREnS_Y7tqnBA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Missing it's scenic route placard.

They were also missing a straight-edge when they applied the numerals.

It makes me think its a fairly old shield and might be reflective paint with vinyl numbers.  That's a common error with a lot of the earlier green California spades. 

myosh_tino

Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.

Max Rockatansky

Quote from: myosh_tino on March 24, 2018, 02:36:43 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on March 23, 2018, 09:29:40 PM
Quote from: mrpablue on March 23, 2018, 06:53:35 PM
What's up with this END SR152 sign at I-5?

https://www.google.com/maps/@37.0566381,-120.9722302,3a,75y,110.19h,91.66t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFiajF2xjERREnS_Y7tqnBA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Missing it's scenic route placard.

That's the most logical explanation however, the "END" placard should have been white-on-blue and all lowercase.

The one up Pacheco Pass to the west is correct:

https://flic.kr/p/Ybgp64

The real question I've always had is what made Caltrans and legislature think CA 152 over Pacheco Pass deserved to be designated as a scenic route?   It's kind of neat seeing the reservoir but 152 sure can't hold a candle to 198 or 130 in the Diablo Range for scenery. 

myosh_tino

Quote from: Max Rockatansky on March 24, 2018, 03:05:22 PM
Quote from: myosh_tino on March 24, 2018, 02:36:43 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on March 23, 2018, 09:29:40 PM
Quote from: mrpablue on March 23, 2018, 06:53:35 PM
What's up with this END SR152 sign at I-5?

https://www.google.com/maps/@37.0566381,-120.9722302,3a,75y,110.19h,91.66t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFiajF2xjERREnS_Y7tqnBA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Missing it's scenic route placard.

That's the most logical explanation however, the "END" placard should have been white-on-blue and all lowercase.

The one up Pacheco Pass to the west is correct:

https://flic.kr/p/Ybgp64

The real question I've always had is what made Caltrans and legislature think CA 152 over Pacheco Pass deserved to be designated as a scenic route?   It's kind of neat seeing the reservoir but 152 sure can't hold a candle to 198 or 130 in the Diablo Range for scenery.

I presume the scenic route designation is because of the San Luis Reservoir but I'm surprised that it was not extended west to the Gilroy city limits as I find that stretch of 152 just as scenic.
Quote from: golden eagle
If I owned a dam and decided to donate it to charity, would I be giving a dam? I'm sure that might be a first because no one really gives a dam.

TBKS1


Car-Hop Crossing by TheInstrumentalist, on Flickr

While I was in Hot Springs earlier today, I decided to stop at a Sonic drive-in. Afterwards, I saw this sign, so I decided to take a picture of it.

I'll also include this one as well.


Road work on US-70 by TheInstrumentalist, on Flickr

I-30 Northbound in southern Saline County.
I take pictures of road signs, that's about it.

General rule of thumb: Just stay in the "Traffic Control" section of the forum and you'll be fine.

D-Dey65

Something I noticed on my Wikipedia photography crusade in November 2017 when I was taking pictures of the Country Life Press LIRR station;
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:05-Country_Life_Press_LIRR;_2017-11-15.jpg
That tunnel is in the development between the Hempstead Branch and the former section of the West Hempstead Branch, and you can see a bit of the One Way sign pointing south at the intersection of Franklin Court and 6th Place. Now, if you know that area, you know that Franklin Court is a one-way street around the former and existing railroad ROWs, and 6th Place is one-way westbound from there;
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7200641,-73.6284888,3a,75y,60.52h,96.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sjZSeIucEtABpKtERA1AHwg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en

But if you didn't already know better, you'd think they were ordering you to turn into whoever lives in that driveway.

Maybe an aerial shot would make more sense;
https://www.google.com/maps/place/40°43'16.4%22N+73°37'45.9%22W/@40.7206326,-73.6297341,450m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x0!8m2!3d40.721234!4d-73.629405?hl=en

Quote from: US71 on March 23, 2018, 10:01:41 PM
Something worse than the 169 sign  :o  :-D

I take it they had plans for other signs beneath it.


SectorZ

Quote from: TBKS1 on March 25, 2018, 01:56:12 AM

Car-Hop Crossing by TheInstrumentalist, on Flickr

While I was in Hot Springs earlier today, I decided to stop at a Sonic drive-in. Afterwards, I saw this sign, so I decided to take a picture of it.

I like that one. Kind of a unique thing but gets the point across.

cjk374

Quote from: D-Dey65 link=topic=11045.msg2313678#msg2313678 date=1521987318

quote author=US71 link=topic=11045.msg2313437#msg2313437 date=1521856901]
Something worse than the 169 sign  :o  :-D

I take it they had plans for other signs beneath it.

[/quote]

I don't think so. I believe it was an extra bracket from when these signs were put up a few blocks away:

https://www.google.com/maps/@32.5147247,-93.746499,0a,75y,321.88h,88.73t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1stFcnpwSC31Ti4q47x8ZEIw!2e0

I also believe the LA 1 shields put up at this intersection were the very first black & white shields ever seen in the state. I think these were put up in the early 90s.
Runnin' roads and polishin' rails.

busman_49

Seen in a construction zone on I-65 in Indiana.  Pretty sure this is a first for me...
Road noise by Ryan busman_49, on Flickr

cjk374

Oh no...it came back from the dead:

Ugly LA 532 shields at exit 52. by Jess Kilgore, on Flickr

Back in the 80, there was a very similar design of state shields posted on most of the exits on LA 3132 & I-220. It looks as though Mississippi took over all of the Louisiana delta land up to Monroe, and the Florida parishes decided to take back the Florida panhandle. This new one doesn't look as bad as those in the 80s, but still not that great either. Sticker on the back is dated 2/15.

So...can it get worse? Let's see:


Ugly, 4-digit-peeling LA state shield. North of Ruston. by Jess Kilgore, on Flickr

Yes it can. I don't know why LaDOTD is starting to use 30x24 shields. Most non-Louisianians would say a 4-digit route needs a 30x24. We don't. How old is this sign you ask? The date is 12/6/17. Do the math...that sign has only been there 4 months!

What does a 3-digit sign look like on 30x24?

3-digit shield on 30x24. LA 146 @ I-20, Ruston. by Jess Kilgore, on Flickr

Can you see where (I believe) the ugly comes from? Using the 24x24 LA 146 to the left, you can see that the sign shop used the same font on both sizes of shields. This creates lots of extra bare real estate.

Did DOTD actually put a 2-digit route on 30x24???

LA 15 using 30x24 shield. Lillie, LA. by Jess Kilgore, on Flickr

Yep. Sure did. This seems like such a waste of money & material. The money used for these 30x24 shields could have been spent on more durable GREEN & WHITE 24x24 shields.

Just my opinion.  :angry:
Runnin' roads and polishin' rails.

JoePCool14

I honestly feel like they should just give up and make the shield a giant "L". It would be much easier and reflect the sorry state of their ability.

:) Needs more... :sombrero: Not quite... :bigass: Perfect.
JDOT: We make the world a better place to drive.
Travel Mapping | 60+ Clinches | 260+ Traveled | 8000+ Miles Logged

MNHighwayMan

The thing I really don't understand is how Louisiana seems to have such abundant problems with peeling digits compared to all the other states. Is the climate of Louisiana really that terrible? Or do they just really suck that much at making shields?

Max Rockatansky

The High Speed Rail Project around Fresno has bared strange fruit with these weird CA 99 shields:

99CAa by Max Rockatansky, on Flickr

TBKS1

I take pictures of road signs, that's about it.

General rule of thumb: Just stay in the "Traffic Control" section of the forum and you'll be fine.



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.