AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules to ensure post quality. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: Public Comment  (Read 7034 times)

Mergingtraffic

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1982
  • Location: NYC-CT
  • Last Login: November 05, 2022, 05:07:49 PM
    • My Flickr alias: MergingTraffic
Public Comment
« on: May 03, 2011, 08:26:31 PM »

How many of you respond to public comments on projects ot STIPs or the long range trans plans?

 A couple around my area just reissued their transportation long-term plans and I commented.  The response was favorable although I wonder if they are actually considered if they don't follow the mold. 
Logged
I only take pics of good looking signs. Long live non-reflective button copy!
MergingTraffic https://www.flickr.com/photos/98731835@N05/

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 16746
  • Nit picker of unprecedented pedantry

  • Age: 32
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 09:02:03 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2011, 08:06:51 PM »

I know that our member J.N. Winkler commented on the 2009 MUTCD and was even successful in getting FHWA to retain the option for traditional stippled-arrow diagrammatics.
Logged

3467

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1526
  • Last Login: Today at 06:28:22 PM
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2011, 11:16:01 PM »

I do and on any Environmental Impact Statements as well. Sometimes they pay attention sometimes not
Logged

hbelkins

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 18242
  • It is well, it is well, with my soul.

  • Age: 61
  • Location: Kentucky
  • Last Login: Today at 01:01:18 PM
    • Millennium Highway
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2011, 07:51:29 PM »

Each transportation district in Kentucky is in the process of establishing a set of priority routes for purposes of future construction and where it sits on the pecking order list for maintenance. In my district we are actively soliciting public comments and even created our own new email address specifically for that purpose. We also plan to use it when we have public hearings, public informational meetings, etc. I understand from our planning engineer that we have been getting comments and they are being taken under advisement.
Logged


Government would be tolerable if not for politicians and bureaucrats.

Alps

  • y u m
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15322
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 39
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: Today at 12:28:10 AM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2011, 06:15:11 AM »

I'd love to comment on more projects and attend public meetings, but worry that working for an engineering firm may make it difficult to respond as a private citizen. Even if I officially don't represent them, in a way I always do.

Landshark

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 163
  • Last Login: August 12, 2016, 10:18:31 PM
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2011, 06:03:34 PM »


It is essential that we citizens speak up.  In my state, the DOT massively misdesigned an important interchange (I-5, US 101 in Olympia/Tumwater) 30 years ago.  I have been pushing them to fix their mistakes in the future.  We need more people speaking up!
Logged

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 16746
  • Nit picker of unprecedented pedantry

  • Age: 32
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 09:02:03 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2011, 10:32:18 PM »

I'd love to comment on more projects and attend public meetings, but worry that working for an engineering firm may make it difficult to respond as a private citizen. Even if I officially don't represent them, in a way I always do.

Afraid of being a lobbyist? :P
Logged

Alps

  • y u m
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15322
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 39
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: Today at 12:28:10 AM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #7 on: May 07, 2011, 03:00:29 AM »

I'd love to comment on more projects and attend public meetings, but worry that working for an engineering firm may make it difficult to respond as a private citizen. Even if I officially don't represent them, in a way I always do.

Afraid of being a lobbyist? :P
Afraid of saying something that:
* may go against my company's position (or those higher up)
* may be construed to represent my company because i am an employee (if i or my name is recognized at any point)
* furthermore, may be seen as a "plant" by my company, which is in very poor form
* may lead to ethical issues if my comment causes a decision chain that favors my company
* may lead to job security issues if my comment causes a decision chain that works against my company
* casts blame, intentionally or not, on any company including my own

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 16746
  • Nit picker of unprecedented pedantry

  • Age: 32
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: Today at 09:02:03 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2011, 07:36:33 PM »

If they tried to fire you because you commented on a public project then that would absolutely be grounds for a wrongful-termination lawsuit. As long as you don't go in there and say "I am Steve Alpert of WXYZ Engineering and it should be like that" you can hardly be faulted for having an opinion on a public issue. And you can't be faulted for that not being the same opinion as your superiors. I'm sure we all disagree with our employers on one thing or another—hell, I have strenuous moral objections to my company's hiring policy, for example.
Logged

corco

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5160
  • Just Livin' the Dream

  • Age: 34
  • Location: Manchester, Connecticut
  • Last Login: November 29, 2022, 08:52:13 AM
    • Corcohighways.org
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2011, 09:30:08 PM »

Ideally, that's what you could do, but if Steve were to make a public comment that were to lead to problems for the company he may get fired and he may have a wrongful termination claim, but I'd bid him the best of luck finding a new engineering job.

It sucks that the world works that way but it does.

J N Winkler

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 7928
  • Location: Wichita, Kansas
  • Last Login: Today at 08:28:52 PM
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #10 on: May 08, 2011, 02:08:20 PM »

Afraid of saying something that:
* may go against my company's position (or those higher up)
* may be construed to represent my company because i am an employee (if i or my name is recognized at any point)
* furthermore, may be seen as a "plant" by my company, which is in very poor form
* may lead to ethical issues if my comment causes a decision chain that favors my company
* may lead to job security issues if my comment causes a decision chain that works against my company
* casts blame, intentionally or not, on any company including my own

I don't think it is necessary to have an absolute rule against commenting on transportation projects while working for a PEF, but it is certainly ethically responsible to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to state (if you are employed as an engineer) that you are commenting in a strictly private capacity, as a private citizen, and that your comments are not to be construed as an attempt to practice engineering.  It is also worth thinking about the context in which the comments are made since this influences whether any disclaimers are accepted as credible.

In Kansas we had a situation similar to this some years ago, as part of the long-running South Lawrence Trafficway saga.  Pretty much every KDOT secretary since the 1980's has wanted to build the SLT, as has the power structure in Douglas County, but as a result of significant local opposition the proposal has gone through an EIS process three times.  At one point the proposal looked like it had been talked to death when Mike Rees, who was then KDOT chief counsel, made several interventions in favor of it.  Rees claimed in subsequent newspaper interviews that he was acting strictly in a personal capacity, and this might even have been true (a quick Google search suggests that he now practices law in Lecompton, which is just west of Lawrence), but at the time he was widely considered the wholly owned creature of E. Dean Carlson, who was then KDOT secretary and had a reputation for fractious dealings with localities.  Many thought Rees was "double-dipping" in the environmental process on Carlson's orders and this caused much resentment.

Carlson's successor, Deb Miller (the current KDOT secretary), took a much more low-key approach to the SLT and I believe this is why it is now in design with good prospects of being let to construction in the next two years.
Logged
"It is necessary to spend a hundred lire now to save a thousand lire later."--Piero Puricelli, explaining the need for a first-class road system to Benito Mussolini

Alps

  • y u m
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15322
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 39
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: Today at 12:28:10 AM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #11 on: May 09, 2011, 07:29:08 PM »

If they tried to fire you because you commented on a public project then that would absolutely be grounds for a wrongful-termination lawsuit. As long as you don't go in there and say "I am Steve Alpert of WXYZ Engineering and it should be like that" you can hardly be faulted for having an opinion on a public issue. And you can't be faulted for that not being the same opinion as your superiors. I'm sure we all disagree with our employers on one thing or another—hell, I have strenuous moral objections to my company's hiring policy, for example.
NJ is employment at will. So they can fire me for any reason they want and not tell me why. Just FYI.

I don't think it is necessary to have an absolute rule against commenting on transportation projects while working for a PEF, but it is certainly ethically responsible to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to state (if you are employed as an engineer) that you are commenting in a strictly private capacity, as a private citizen, and that your comments are not to be construed as an attempt to practice engineering.  It is also worth thinking about the context in which the comments are made since this influences whether any disclaimers are accepted as credible.

Thanks - that's not an angle I thought of for some reason but it's a good point. I might try that next time.

Mr. Matté

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 880
  • Age: 32
  • Location: NJTP - Exit '08
  • Last Login: Today at 04:02:06 PM
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2013, 11:56:14 PM »

Sorry for the bump, but I think someone from this forum made this comment about a new state highway in southern Ohio:

http://www.dot.state.oh.us/districts/d10/d10planning/Lists/Public%20Comment%20SR%20733/SR%20733%20Public%20Comment%20Form.aspx
Logged

jeffandnicole

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 13643
  • Age: 47
  • Location: South Jersey
  • Last Login: Today at 12:44:55 PM
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2013, 11:02:08 AM »

I attend some public meetings and comment on some TIPs, mostly in NJ. 

I find many public meetings are really just information sessions.  What I say isn't written down, and who knows what is remembered or brought back for suggestions.  I guess I could follow up with a written email/letter.  Many times, it seems if a public official says something, it carries a lot more weight than if Joe Public says something, even though Joe may utilize the road on a daily basis, and the public official may rarely use that intersection, but heard a complaint from 90 year old Margaret that our roads are too dangerous and is simply passing that along.

For the NJ TIP, which is actually run thru the DVRPC in Philly, my experience has been less than positive.  A few years ago, I wrote 3 comments, all regarding state roads.  For some reason, 2 of those comments were passed onto the County planning department, which responded back that they don't have jurisdiction for those roads (duh).  The 3rd comment did get to the State, and the official response was that it would be looked into, but I never heard anything since.

For what it's worth, that comment was adding overhead signs on NJ 73 between the NJ Turnpike & 295.  It's a short, busy stretch of roadway where lane positioning is important, and often times the smaller signs off to the right shoulder are missed due to trucks and other traffic, and aren't totally accurate anyway.
Logged

Duke87

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5839
  • Age: 34
  • Location: Stamford, CT
  • Last Login: December 01, 2022, 12:41:27 AM
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2013, 03:28:20 PM »

I attended a public meeting about the proposed reconstruction of the US 7/Merritt Parkway interchange in the spring of 2008. Someone from ConnDOT who I spoke to there was impressed by my knowledge of roads and was about ready to offer me a job until he learned I wouldn't be graduating for another year. Then later that year the market crashed, ConnDOT started laying people off, and the project the meeting was about got put on indefinite hold... ah well, eh?
Logged
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.

mass_citizen

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 283
  • Location: Boston, MA
  • Last Login: February 08, 2022, 11:09:21 PM
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #15 on: November 02, 2013, 03:37:05 PM »

NJ is employment at will. So they can fire me for any reason they want and not tell me why. Just FYI.

Employment at will or not, there are still laws against firing in a discriminatory manner (i.e. race, religion, gender, etc.). Not that that would help you in this case, but just saying there are reasons for which someone cannot be fired.

I think the best way to handle a situation like yours would be to take it on a case by case basis. If there is a project that affects you personally that you want to express your opinion on, you can talk to your superior and just give them a heads up. You can also ask them if they foresee your company's involvement in the project, and if not, you should be good to go.
Logged

renegade

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 984
  • Change my mind.

  • Location: Paulding Light
  • Last Login: November 23, 2021, 02:27:24 PM
Re: Public Comment
« Reply #16 on: November 24, 2013, 10:33:33 PM »

Sorry for the bump, but I think someone from this forum made this comment about a new state highway in southern Ohio:

http://www.dot.state.oh.us/districts/d10/d10planning/Lists/Public%20Comment%20SR%20733/SR%20733%20Public%20Comment%20Form.aspx

   

"Beldar   
Planet Earth
   
At your public forums you should serve mass quantities of pencil shavings and dishwashing liquid."


LOL
Logged
Don’t ask me how I know.  Just understand that I do.

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.