AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: States/provinces with the right number of, or too many, rest areas  (Read 1148 times)

TheOneKEA

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 317
  • Last Login: September 30, 2022, 08:57:45 PM

One common complaint I’ve read on the forum is that there are not enough rest areas available in some states and that rest areas that used to be available have since closed down or are otherwise unavailable. I’d like to turn that question on its head: are there any states or provinces that have exactly the right number of rest areas, and are there any states or provinces that have too many rest areas and would benefit from closing them down?
Logged

Max Rockatansky

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 19711
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Route 9, Sector 26
  • Last Login: Today at 04:25:52 PM
    • Gribblenation
Re: States/provinces with the right number of, or too many, rest areas
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2022, 02:38:14 PM »

There is never too many rest areas.  There is such a thing though as supporting a budget for too many rest areas.  Arizona ran into an issue several years ago where they closed several rest areas to save on funding. 
Logged

TheHighwayMan394

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5201
  • Age: 32
  • Location: Twin Ports/North Shore
  • Last Login: Today at 12:28:09 PM
    • Patrick Lilja's Minnesconsin Highways
Re: States/provinces with the right number of, or too many, rest areas
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2022, 02:55:36 PM »

MN does a decent job with its spacing and amount of rest areas I think, including the occasional non-interstate rest area.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.