Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.
Quote from: kernals12 on Today at 08:52:09 AMQuote from: SEWIGuy on Today at 08:48:16 AMQuote from: kernals12 on Today at 08:27:16 AMQuote from: kalvado on Today at 08:15:24 AMSo, how do you view mortgage in general? Right now, it's a loan with certain financial terms - interest rate, payoff period etc. Real estate component is just backing the loan for bank's "peace of mind". Risks of property ownership are still on a borrower, abet insurance is required.
You propose to tie in real estate much deeper into the equation. Can you describe full legal framework? What are the right of the bank in this scheme?
It would turn mortgages into a more equity-like product, the value of them would rise and fall with the value of the underlying asset.
If a borrower defaults, then the bank forecloses, sells the house and makes a profit or loss equal to their share of the equity.
A mortagage should not be an "equity like product." A house should be. A mortage is just a loan.
Any financial advisor will tell you that you need to have a diverse portfolio. Having hundreds of thousands of dollars tied up in a single asset is not a diverse portfolio.
Quote from: kernals12 on Today at 09:33:11 AMQuote from: SEWIGuy on Today at 09:00:31 AMQuote from: kernals12 on Today at 08:52:09 AMQuote from: SEWIGuy on Today at 08:48:16 AMQuote from: kernals12 on Today at 08:27:16 AMQuote from: kalvado on Today at 08:15:24 AMSo, how do you view mortgage in general? Right now, it's a loan with certain financial terms - interest rate, payoff period etc. Real estate component is just backing the loan for bank's "peace of mind". Risks of property ownership are still on a borrower, abet insurance is required.
You propose to tie in real estate much deeper into the equation. Can you describe full legal framework? What are the right of the bank in this scheme?
It would turn mortgages into a more equity-like product, the value of them would rise and fall with the value of the underlying asset.
If a borrower defaults, then the bank forecloses, sells the house and makes a profit or loss equal to their share of the equity.
A mortagage should not be an "equity like product." A house should be. A mortage is just a loan.
Any financial advisor will tell you that you need to have a diverse portfolio. Having hundreds of thousands of dollars tied up in a single asset is not a diverse portfolio.
But you are suggesting that it would be better to create more uncertainty around that asset because you don't know what it will ultimately cost you. You are suggesting that people should commit to paying for an asset for as much as 30 years without any knowledge of the true cost of that asset when you make that commitment. No financial advisor would think that is a good idea.
And you are also overlooking the fact that part of why you take out a mortgage is because you are paying for a place to live.
This is just a really bad and impractical idea.
I linked to a study showing that this kind of mortgage would *halve* the number of foreclosures.