Recent posts

#1

Bridges / Re: Lansing, IA new Mississipp...

Last post by SEWIGuy - Today at 04:41:45 PM

It hasn't been shared here I think, but the Black Hawk Bridge re-opened a couple of weeks ago.

#2

Traffic Control / Re: Unique, Odd, or Interestin...

Last post by plain - Today at 04:37:27 PM

Spotted this last week but forgot to post. This is on Richmond's southside on 26th St. I kinda like it actually.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/H65XMmtmXE8bUAnW6



moto g pure

#3

Northeast / Re: What is it with I-95 & bri...

Last post by shadyjay - Today at 04:35:14 PM

Didn't the state plan on building an expressway along the route of CT-34 from the danbury area to New Haven during its road-building bonanza?

Yes, but that concept died at least 42-45 years ago.   There is / was a directional interchange on 84, believe the old number was possibly Exit 25.   That interchange may have been removed and replaced with something less high powered.  Haven't been up there in over 15 years.  That was supposed to have been the western terminus of the CT - 34 expressway. Would have been a useful connection.   They should have extended the "urban' CT- 34 section in New Haven a lot sooner, that might have made a push to complete it more possible.   Instead, the urban section was cut back, and a biomedical firm was allowed to build directly in the ROW.  Bad planning. 

The "high speed interchange" on I-84 is Exit 11, in Newtown, and that was built for the CT 25 expressway, which currently ends in Trumbull.  The first exit off that road from the north would have been CT 34, but as a surface road.  The CT 34 expressway extension west of New Haven would have had it meet up with the existing 4-lane section in West Haven, though that section is more of a boulevard.  There were plans for some sort of expressway from Ridgefield to Shelton, according to Kurumi's page on CT 34, but I don't believe any work towards such an expressway was ever performed.
https://www.kurumi.com/roads/ct/ct34.html

Having taken CT 34 from I-84 to I-95 numerous times, it would've been nice to have some sort of connection between the two, in limited-access form.  One of my first jobs as a surveyor back in 1999 was the Stevenson Dam project, a sizeable choke-point on that route, especially for tractor trailers.  Its been 25 years and there's been zero progress made on replacing that dam bride (it litterally is a dam bridge).

#4

Mid-South / Re: I-14 in Texas

Last post by Bobby5280 - Today at 04:20:06 PM

Unless I missed something in the presentation, I didn't see any mention about improving the I-35/Loop-363 interchange on the South side of Temple. That really has to be turned into a directional stack, and a pretty big one at that since I-35 would have separate express and general purpose lanes. Come to think of it, they'll also have to improve the I-14/I-35 interchange too.

If this proposal gets approved a whole bunch of commercial properties next to I-35 will have to be bought and cleared.

#5

Great Lakes and Ohio Valley / Re: Kentucky

Last post by hbelkins - Today at 02:45:26 PM

A few years ago, the Kentucky legislature officially changed the name of the Cumberland Parkway to the Cumberland Expressway. I was told by the bill's sponsor that this was done to expedite and facilitate the conversion of the road to I-365, although nothing similar was done to the Purchase, WK, Pennyrile, or Green River Natcher parkways when they became interstates.

I recently drove most of the Cumberland Park/Expressway (from Exit 86 to Exit 1) and noticed that the signs have all been changed along the route in the District 3 (Bowling Green) counties of Metcalfe and Barren. A glance at the KYTC photolog shows that most of the signs along the intersecting routes have been changed as well -- although the overheads on I-65 have not been changed. However, the signs along the route in the District 8 (Somerset) counties of Adair, Russell, and Pulaski have not been changed. The only "Cumberland Expressway" sign I've seen in District 8 is on westbound KY 80 at US 27, where there's a "To Cumberland Expressway (right arrow)" sign. (I find it faster to continue straight at that intersection onto the old alignment of the parkway, as opposed to going north on US 27 for a couple of miles before getting on the parkway where it was extended to become part of the future northern Somerset bypass.)

What makes that more interesting is that the bill's sponsor is from Somerset.

#6

Off-Topic / Re: Random Thoughts

Last post by 1995hoo - Today at 02:44:58 PM

#7

Northeast / Re: Massachusetts

Last post by bob7374 - Today at 02:42:23 PM

Looking at Google Street View, I've noticed multiple sign changes along I-195 East in Fall River in a short amount of (recent) time.

In July 2021, the sign for 24 North from 195 East is an "old-style" sign with a "1/2" exit tab and no white horizontal line below "exit 14B".

In October 2022, a new sign was installed replacing the old one, and includes a yellow "LEFT" tab.

In October 2023, the "LEFT" tab has been removed, and exposes the fact that the sign was fabricated with its old sequential number (8B), despite being installed AFTER the exit numbers were switched over to mileage-based ones!  Who dropped the ball here?  This has the exit sign presentation looking really ugly.

Guess they had the same potential problem with the exit tab bracket that caused MassDOT to remove them from signs on I-93, I-95 and elsewhere. New ones have only gone up in a few places, but I haven't seen them south of Boston yet. The overhead signs were designed prior to the exit renumbering in 2017 but were not put up until 2022 since they discovered problems with the soil around the MA 24/I-195 interchange during the initial sign contract that was to install them in 2019-2020.

#8

Northwest / Re: Washington

Last post by TEG24601 - Today at 02:26:39 PM

You're gonna die if you go that way?

[Mukilteo Ferry] Terminal Way.

There are quite a few other "Terminal Way" designations in other parts of the country, chiefly near airports or other cargo-handling places.

It would be hilarious if WSDOT gets involved and they have to call is "Whidbey Island Highway" or "Whidbey Island Blvd", given how much distain residents of old Mukilteo have towards the ferry and ferry traffic.

#9

Pacific Southwest / Re: 🛣 Headlines About Californ...

Last post by Plutonic Panda - Today at 02:19:44 PM

Sepulveda BLVD through the Sepulveda Pass should have been addressed as well. It should be 3 lanes each way with protected bike lanes and sidewalks. Instead there are sections with no pedestrian footpaths. It's very dangerous to ride a bike on it. It is only two lanes each way and can get extremely congested, and has a bottleneck at the tunnel where it narrows to 3 lanes.

I also wish the subway would've been built at the same time the freeway was expanded. It'd be nice to see this country take on more mega projects at once addressing entire corridors instead of segments.

#10

Road Enthusiasts Meetings / Re: SWPA25 Road Enthusiast Mee...

Last post by PAHighways - Today at 02:16:51 PM

Since we're less than 24 hours from SWPA25, I figured I would post a round-up of important information for tomorrow.

Details about lunch and the itinerary can be found at my site.  Lunch will be $17.50/person, so if you bring $21, the change plus the dollar (which equals 20%) can be gratuity for the servers since that is not included on the bill.

The weather is not looking great as showers will be in the area with possible thunderstorms after 2 PM, and the high temperature will be in the upper 60s as per the National Weather Service.

Attendees will receive a copy of the 2024 official state road map, which has one partially erroneous update since the 2023 edition.