News:

Thanks to everyone for the feedback on what errors you encountered from the forum database changes made in Fall 2023. Let us know if you discover anymore.

Main Menu

Slip lanes meeting at ~ 60-75º angle

Started by jakeroot, January 12, 2014, 09:02:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jakeroot

In Australia, most new slip lanes meet the approach road (?) at about a 60-75 degree angle, so as to discourage people from forgetting their priority, or rather a lack thereof (so I can tell). I've compiled a short list of an intersection from each Australian state to prove that it is in fact an accepted engineering movement across the country:

QLD: http://goo.gl/b0NYfT
NSW: http://goo.gl/udS0Pm
WA: http://goo.gl/PYbVYK
NT: http://goo.gl/jPyMBk
VIC: http://goo.gl/8Kk1bN
SA: http://goo.gl/jBQlQd
(I've excluded Tasmania because I was only able to find a few slip lanes overall, and most were the old style).



In the US, however, I have only found one example, and it's where the Boulder Highway meets Lake Mead Parkway in Henderson, Nevada:

http://goo.gl/mpNwz7

Anybody else aware of intersections with slip lanes that meet in such a manner?... and not like this: http://goo.gl/wOlpbO (where they appear to simply merge).

I did find one diagram on ite.org that shows the tighter angled slip lanes having greater pedestrian visibility:



realjd

#1
From what I remember from the last time I was there, those "slip lanes" were only used in cases where left on red was allowed.

jakeroot

Quote from: realjd on January 12, 2014, 11:15:31 PM
From what I remember from the last time I was there, those "slip lanes" were only used in cases where left of red was allowed.

I can't say I'm sure what you mean when you say "left of red". Unless you meant "left ON red", in which case I am still not sure.

DaBigE

Unfortunately, aerial photos haven't been updated recently enough to show, but when slip lanes are involved in a reconstruction around here, they are being redesigned to intersect at a sharper angle. WisDOT even specifies this in the design of slip lanes (more commonly referred to as "partial right turn bypasses" around here) for roundabouts:
Quote from: WisDOT FDM 11-26-30.5.17.2A partial bypass lane with a curbed vane island requires approaching vehicles to yield to traffic leaving the
adjacent exit. This alternative "˜snags' the right turner from making a through movement while preserving good
sight to the left for circulating/exiting traffic. Generally an intersection angle of 70 degrees or higher is desirable.
WisDOT FDM - Roundabout Design
"We gotta find this road, it's like Bob's road!" - Rabbit, Twister

realjd

Quote from: jake on January 12, 2014, 11:55:40 PM
Quote from: realjd on January 12, 2014, 11:15:31 PM
From what I remember from the last time I was there, those "slip lanes" were only used in cases where left of red was allowed.

I can't say I'm sure what you mean when you say "left of red". Unless you meant "left ON red", in which case I am still not sure.

I did mean to type "left on red". Left turns at a red light are illegal in Australia. In cases where they allow it, they often use a separate lane like that. Notice how they all have either a "turn left at any time with care" sign or a yield sign?

Bitmapped

The right turn movement from Boyers Avenue southbound onto US 19 NB/WV 7 WB in Star City, WV was reconstructed like this in conjunction with a new Sheetz. Current aerial photography is at http://goo.gl/maps/opgU0 .

I originally thought the change was because of the new RIRO turn lane to access Sheetz but perhaps not.  As part of the reconstruction, WVDOH changed this from a yield to a signalized movement.

Mr_Northside

Quote from: Bitmapped on January 15, 2014, 02:23:25 PM
The right turn movement from Boyers Avenue southbound onto US 19 NB/WV 7 WB in Star City, WV was reconstructed like this in conjunction with a new Sheetz. Current aerial photography is at http://goo.gl/maps/opgU0 .

I originally thought the change was because of the new RIRO turn lane to access Sheetz but perhaps not.  As part of the reconstruction, WVDOH changed this from a yield to a signalized movement.

Damn... that Sheetz is only ~1 mile from another Sheetz.  Between the interstate and the university, there's probably enough business to warrant both.  Man... it's been over 3 years now since I've been on that stretch of road.  Doesn't feel that long.
I don't have opinions anymore. All I know is that no one is better than anyone else, and everyone is the best at everything

jakeroot

Posting back in this topic because I found something in the 1961 MUTCD (Chapter 4 on Islands) that, honestly, took my breath away. I have no idea where this photo was taken (or when, except obviously before the 1961 publishing), but the design of the right-turn bypasses (i.e. slip lanes or channelized right turns) at this intersection seem well ahead of their time.

The 70-degree meeting angle of slip lanes was something that I thought started in Australia/NZ, but apparently that's not the case?


Scott5114

#8
Interesting. I didn't know the MUTCD used to include actual photographs instead of just diagrams.

(Also, you mean 75°. º is used as an ordinal indicator in other languages, like "st" or "th" in English.)
uncontrollable freak sardine salad chef

jakeroot

Resurrecting this topic again because I found the above image (finally). It's in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Of note, the intersection has been reconstructed a few times since the image. The bottom left slip lane was removed around 2000, but at some point between 1963-1995 a slip lane was added to the top left area (where the very old building once sat). Further, the slip lane in the bottom right has been converted into a right-only lane. Of further interest (to me, mainly), many other slip lanes in the nearby area have this 70-degree meeting angle, which as I said before, is not the typical meeting angle for slip lanes of that time. Given that this angle is now more or less desirable in high-ped areas, I can only assume that Milwaukee engineers were time lords and skipped ahead in time to discover this style of application.

I was concerned about the validity of my claim, but Historic Aerials suggests that I am correct in presuming this is the location.




Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.