AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules for political content in signatures and user profiles. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: Suggestion: Users should have to get mod approval before editing topics/posts  (Read 2240 times)

Roadgeekteen

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 9862
  • Interstates everywhere to everything

  • Age: 17
  • Location: Needham
  • Last Login: Today at 12:53:06 PM
    • old interstate plans

I don't want users to be able to mess up conversations by mass editing or deleting posts. Think before you post on the internet.

tolbs17

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2474
  • Age: 18
  • Location: Greenville, NC
  • Last Login: Today at 12:16:42 PM

That's called "moderating".
Logged

kphoger

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 18771
  • Location: Wichita, KS
  • Last Login: June 18, 2021, 08:03:55 PM

I think people should have a 15-minute window to edit a post.

However, the point that has been brought up before is that some threads are constructed in such a way that the OP edits the original post with new info as it becomes available.
Logged
Keep right except to pass.  Yes.  You.
Visit scenic Orleans County, NY!
Male pronouns, please.

I'm rather partial to whipped cream, personally.

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 11945
  • Age: 31
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: June 22, 2021, 06:23:28 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards

If a user is found to be editing/deleting posts disruptively, they may be given a warning for disruptive behavior and/or the ability to edit or delete posts disabled on a per-user basis.

The vast majority of users use the edit function constructively, so disabling edit/deletion rights globally would not be beneficial to the forum.
Logged

Roadgeekteen

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 9862
  • Interstates everywhere to everything

  • Age: 17
  • Location: Needham
  • Last Login: Today at 12:53:06 PM
    • old interstate plans

If a user is found to be editing/deleting posts disruptively, they may be given a warning for disruptive behavior and/or the ability to edit or delete posts disabled.

The vast majority of users use the edit function constructively, so disabling edit/deletion rights globally would not be beneficial to the forum.

Ok that's good. Just don't like rage editing.

tolbs17

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2474
  • Age: 18
  • Location: Greenville, NC
  • Last Login: Today at 12:16:42 PM

If a user is found to be editing/deleting posts disruptively, they may be given a warning for disruptive behavior and/or the ability to edit or delete posts disabled.

The vast majority of users use the edit function constructively, so disabling edit/deletion rights globally would not be beneficial to the forum.

Ok that's good. Just don't like rage editing.
Same here. Unless I realize the thread is stupid!
Logged

Roadgeekteen

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 9862
  • Interstates everywhere to everything

  • Age: 17
  • Location: Needham
  • Last Login: Today at 12:53:06 PM
    • old interstate plans

If a user is found to be editing/deleting posts disruptively, they may be given a warning for disruptive behavior and/or the ability to edit or delete posts disabled.

The vast majority of users use the edit function constructively, so disabling edit/deletion rights globally would not be beneficial to the forum.

Ok that's good. Just don't like rage editing.
Same here. Unless I realize the thread is stupid!
Even if it's stupid, editing it will make the next few posts confusing for readers to understand.

dlsterner

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 460
  • Age: 62
  • Location: Maryland
  • Last Login: Today at 02:19:01 AM

I don't want users to be able to mess up conversations by mass editing or deleting posts. Think before you post on the internet.

Too heavy-handed IMHO.  There have been a few times where I've noticed a typo in my post, and my OCD compels me to fix it.

In any case my edits do not totally change the intent of the post.  I want to be able to change "I-496" when I meant to type "I-495".  As opposed to a Fictional thread that had its entire content changed to "7".

Edit:  Changed "compiles" typo to "compels".  I didn't purposely plan that!  Really!
« Last Edit: April 30, 2021, 05:32:00 PM by dlsterner »
Logged

Roadgeekteen

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 9862
  • Interstates everywhere to everything

  • Age: 17
  • Location: Needham
  • Last Login: Today at 12:53:06 PM
    • old interstate plans

I don't want users to be able to mess up conversations by mass editing or deleting posts. Think before you post on the internet.

Too heavy-handed IMHO.  There have been a few times where I've noticed a typo in my post, and my OCD compiles me to fix it.

In any case my edits do not totally change the intent of the post.  I want to be able to change "I-496" when I meant to type "I-495".  As opposed to a Fictional thread that had its entire content changed to "7".
I like Scott's policy on disruptive editing actually.

JoePCool14

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1682
  • I'm surrounded by IDiOTs.

  • Age: 20
  • Location: Chicagoland, IL / Wisconsin
  • Last Login: Today at 10:15:48 AM

If a user is found to be editing/deleting posts disruptively, they may be given a warning for disruptive behavior and/or the ability to edit or delete posts disabled on a per-user basis.

The vast majority of users use the edit function constructively, so disabling edit/deletion rights globally would not be beneficial to the forum.


Thank you. Most people are sensible about using the edit button, and I do not like using forums where this ability is removed.
Logged

JDOT: We make the world a better place to drive.

1

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 10276
  • UMass Lowell student

  • Age: 22
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: Today at 01:14:56 PM
    • Flickr account

I'm strongly against restrictions, including the 15-minute window.
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US ⒔50
MA ⒐2⒉40.9⒐10⒎10⒐1⒒1⒘1⒚14⒈159
NH 27,38,111A(E); CA133; NY366; GA 42,140; FL A1A; CT32; VT 5A; QC 16⒉16⒌263

Flickr: Click the globe under my avatar

tolbs17

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2474
  • Age: 18
  • Location: Greenville, NC
  • Last Login: Today at 12:16:42 PM

Or you can limit the number of words that you can edit.
Logged

1

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 10276
  • UMass Lowell student

  • Age: 22
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: Today at 01:14:56 PM
    • Flickr account

Or you can limit the number of words that you can edit.

There have been times where I make a post containing two things and the previous poster ninja-edits, making me delete one of the two, as it's already answered or no longer relevant.
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US ⒔50
MA ⒐2⒉40.9⒐10⒎10⒐1⒒1⒘1⒚14⒈159
NH 27,38,111A(E); CA133; NY366; GA 42,140; FL A1A; CT32; VT 5A; QC 16⒉16⒌263

Flickr: Click the globe under my avatar

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 11945
  • Age: 31
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: June 22, 2021, 06:23:28 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards

Or you can limit the number of words that you can edit.

The forum software does not have an option to establish an editing limit by word count.
Logged

CoreySamson

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1026
  • Buc-ee's Fanboy

  • Age: 17
  • Location: Greater Houston, TX
  • Last Login: Today at 11:33:13 AM

I think editing a title should need mod approval. That way we know what the thread was originally about. Other edits, no.
Logged
Houston-area teenage roadgeek.
Amateur guitarist, keyboardist, and now vocalist!

Dominator of Alanland (though I don't have any power).

1

  • *
  • Online Online

  • Posts: 10276
  • UMass Lowell student

  • Age: 22
  • Location: MA/NH border
  • Last Login: Today at 01:14:56 PM
    • Flickr account

I think editing a title should need mod approval. That way we know what the thread was originally about. Other edits, no.
But if there's a typo in the title?
Logged
Clinched

Traveled, plus
US ⒔50
MA ⒐2⒉40.9⒐10⒎10⒐1⒒1⒘1⒚14⒈159
NH 27,38,111A(E); CA133; NY366; GA 42,140; FL A1A; CT32; VT 5A; QC 16⒉16⒌263

Flickr: Click the globe under my avatar

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 11945
  • Age: 31
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: June 22, 2021, 06:23:28 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards

Those of you who habitually quote the OP in your replies are the real MVPs. Steve and I were able to revert a few of these post-blankings because of that.

I think editing a title should need mod approval. That way we know what the thread was originally about. Other edits, no.

The problem is that the forum software doesn't make any distinction between editing the first post in the thread (which what the thread title derives from) or any other post in the thread. There's also no way to "require mod approval" other than to outright deny edit rights and require any edit to be made by a moderator. (This means that we would have to spend more time servicing these requests and less time writing important posts like the history of Grand Alan Garfunkel or whatever.)
Logged

1995hoo

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12901
  • Age: 48
  • Location: Fairfax County, Virginia
  • Last Login: Today at 12:56:48 PM

I agree that a time limit stinks. I’m a member of another forum that limits the editing time to five minutes after posting. It’s not enough time, especially given how often you get autocorrect- or touchscreen-related typos (neither of which were issues when that forum was founded)

I’m in the habit of saying why I edited a post; I got that habit from the same forum noted above because their software has a box for "Reason for editing." It’s optional, but I like the idea.

On the whole, the idea that some people may edit in annoying ways is not a valid reason to remove the option for the rest of us. Dealing with problem users as they arise is exactly the right approach.


Edited per the other post down below.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2021, 06:40:23 PM by 1995hoo »
Logged
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 11945
  • Age: 31
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: June 22, 2021, 06:23:28 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards

On the whole, the idea that some people may edit in annoying ways is not a valid reason to remove the option for the rest of us. Dealing with problem users as they arise is exactly the right approach.

"One person used a thing to do something sucky so now we're going to make it a rule that NOBODY can have it!" was a fundamental management axiom at my last job, which was one of the reasons why working there was so obnoxious.
Logged

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 11945
  • Age: 31
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: June 22, 2021, 06:23:28 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards

Okay, I've been screwing around in the admin tools and want to make sure I didn't break stuff. Can someone confirm that they still have the ability to edit their own posts?
Logged

tolbs17

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2474
  • Age: 18
  • Location: Greenville, NC
  • Last Login: Today at 12:16:42 PM

Okay, I've been screwing around in the admin tools and want to make sure I didn't break stuff. Can someone confirm that they still have the ability to edit their own posts?
Test. It works!

Thanks.
Logged

1995hoo

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12901
  • Age: 48
  • Location: Fairfax County, Virginia
  • Last Login: Today at 12:56:48 PM

Okay, I've been screwing around in the admin tools and want to make sure I didn't break stuff. Can someone confirm that they still have the ability to edit their own posts?

….

Edited per the other post down below.
Logged
"You know, you never have a guaranteed spot until you have a spot guaranteed."
—Olaf Kolzig, as quoted in the Washington Times on March 28, 2003,
commenting on the Capitals clinching a playoff spot.

"That sounded stupid, didn't it?"—Kolzig, to the same reporter a few seconds later.

Scott5114

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 11945
  • Age: 31
  • Location: Norman, OK
  • Last Login: June 22, 2021, 06:23:28 PM
    • Denexa 100% Plastic Playing Cards

Okay, awesome. Thanks guys!
Logged

Roadgeekteen

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 9862
  • Interstates everywhere to everything

  • Age: 17
  • Location: Needham
  • Last Login: Today at 12:53:06 PM
    • old interstate plans

I think editing a title should need mod approval. That way we know what the thread was originally about. Other edits, no.
But if there's a typo in the title?
Minor typos are fine, mods can approve changes.

webny99

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 7077
  • Left lane is for passing, not camping!

  • Age: 21
  • Location: Rochester, NY
  • Last Login: June 22, 2021, 10:20:07 PM

On the whole, the idea that some people may edit in annoying ways is not a valid reason to remove the option for the rest of us. Dealing with problem users as they arise is exactly the right approach.

"One person used a thing to do something sucky so now we're going to make it a rule that NOBODY can have it!" was a fundamental management axiom at my last job, which was one of the reasons why working there was so obnoxious.

I must say, that's pretty much exactly how I feel about the stats page being canned...

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.