AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)  (Read 364962 times)

AHTD

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 303
  • www.idrivearkansas.com

  • Age: 109
  • Location: Arkansas
  • Last Login: June 21, 2017, 07:31:14 PM
    • AHTD Online
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #500 on: July 28, 2014, 10:54:54 AM »

Please reference www.idrivearkansas.com for the most up-to-date construction information. The map you reference is updated by planning on a less frequent schedule than IDRIVE.
 
Be sure to click on the orange lines that represent construction projects. We have added an "additional information" link that will take you to a more detailed project page.
 
 
Logged
Travel and construction information available at www.idrivearkansas.com

Grzrd

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3447
  • Interested Observer

  • Location: Atlanta, GA
  • Last Login: August 27, 2020, 03:56:45 PM
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #501 on: August 06, 2014, 04:21:02 PM »

I-69 Advisory Committee Report and Recommendations ... (page 16/30 of pdf; page 10 of report)
The Texarkana MPO has posted its Draft Texarkana Urban Transportation Study ("TUTS") 2015-2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan ("MTP") ....
After a quick scan of the document, I could not find a direct reference to either the West Loop or the Northern Loop.

I recently stumbled across a February 2014 Power Point presentation that includes a slide envisioning "I-69 TXK Western Loop" going to the TexAmericas Center and north of I-30 (continuing as the Northern Loop?):



It looks like the more recent slide envisions a routing slightly to the east of the routing in the previous slide.  It's also interesting that the more recent slide suggests a Northern Loop connection to I-49, which makes sense considering the Intermodal Center part of the slide includes I-30, I-49 and I-69 shields.
Logged

Grzrd

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3447
  • Interested Observer

  • Location: Atlanta, GA
  • Last Login: August 27, 2020, 03:56:45 PM
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #502 on: August 07, 2014, 09:09:26 PM »

This article reports on the impact that Missouri's rejection of the transportation sales tax will have on the Arkansas section of the Bella Vista Bypass, but I am posting in this thread because of the following graphic accompanying the article:



AHTD, I know it's too late for NWA, but is there still a possibility to get the state name on the SWA shields?
Logged

US71

  • Road Scholar , Master of Snark
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 11835
  • Mad man with a camera

  • Age: 63
  • Location: On the road again
  • Last Login: Today at 02:50:34 PM
    • The Road Less Taken
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #503 on: August 07, 2014, 11:50:26 PM »




That's better than most other media I-49 graphics AND MoDOT's site graphics ;)
Logged
Like Alice I Try To Believe Three Impossible Things Before Breakfast

AHTD

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 303
  • www.idrivearkansas.com

  • Age: 109
  • Location: Arkansas
  • Last Login: June 21, 2017, 07:31:14 PM
    • AHTD Online
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #504 on: August 11, 2014, 10:19:32 AM »

Not in the cards.....
Logged
Travel and construction information available at www.idrivearkansas.com

bugo

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 6514
  • Age: 49
  • Location: Tulsa
  • Last Login: Today at 05:07:00 PM
    • No Frills Blog
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #505 on: August 11, 2014, 10:46:21 AM »

Why do the brand new I-530 shields at the end of AR 530 in Pine Bluff have the state name but the I-49 shields don't?
Logged

AHTD

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 303
  • www.idrivearkansas.com

  • Age: 109
  • Location: Arkansas
  • Last Login: June 21, 2017, 07:31:14 PM
    • AHTD Online
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #506 on: August 11, 2014, 10:50:36 AM »

Define brand new.
Logged
Travel and construction information available at www.idrivearkansas.com

bugo

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 6514
  • Age: 49
  • Location: Tulsa
  • Last Login: Today at 05:07:00 PM
    • No Frills Blog
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #507 on: August 11, 2014, 11:32:06 AM »

Nice way to avoid the question. 

"Contemporary".  Is that better?  Why are the I-49 signs that were produced in the same era far uglier than the I-530 signs?  Why has Arkansas gone from producing attractive shields to some of the ugliest in the nation?  Why are the numbers almost bigger than the shield?
Logged

Grzrd

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3447
  • Interested Observer

  • Location: Atlanta, GA
  • Last Login: August 27, 2020, 03:56:45 PM
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #508 on: August 11, 2014, 11:55:14 AM »

Why do the brand new I-530 shields at the end of AR 530 in Pine Bluff have the state name but the I-49 shields don't?
Define brand new.

FWIW that section of AR 530 was opened to traffic on September 12, 2013:

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=3524.msg245569#msg245569

edit

Here is StreetView imagery of two of the shields:

« Last Edit: August 11, 2014, 01:20:58 PM by Grzrd »
Logged

agentsteel53

  • invisible hand
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15374
  • long live button copy!

  • Age: 41
  • Location: San Diego, CA
  • Last Login: November 21, 2016, 09:58:39 AM
    • AARoads Shield Gallery
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #509 on: August 11, 2014, 04:09:48 PM »

I bet the 530s were extant stock that were installed.

still doesn't explain why Arkansas abandoned the classic '57 spec shield in favor of the garish '70 spec with overlarge numbers.  I think this means California is the only state left that still uses '57 spec fairly consistently.  well, shit.
Logged
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Molandfreak

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1910
  • Age: 28
  • Last Login: Today at 11:34:39 AM
    • Instagram
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #510 on: August 11, 2014, 05:20:57 PM »

I bet the 530s were extant stock that were installed.

still doesn't explain why Arkansas abandoned the classic '57 spec shield in favor of the garish '70 spec with overlarge numbers.  I think this means California is the only state left that still uses '57 spec fairly consistently.  well, shit.
Wyoming?
Logged

US71

  • Road Scholar , Master of Snark
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 11835
  • Mad man with a camera

  • Age: 63
  • Location: On the road again
  • Last Login: Today at 02:50:34 PM
    • The Road Less Taken
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #511 on: August 11, 2014, 06:15:25 PM »

I bet the 530s were extant stock that were installed.

still doesn't explain why Arkansas abandoned the classic '57 spec shield in favor of the garish '70 spec with overlarge numbers.  I think this means California is the only state left that still uses '57 spec fairly consistently.  well, shit.
Wyoming?
Most of the time.
Logged
Like Alice I Try To Believe Three Impossible Things Before Breakfast

agentsteel53

  • invisible hand
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15374
  • long live button copy!

  • Age: 41
  • Location: San Diego, CA
  • Last Login: November 21, 2016, 09:58:39 AM
    • AARoads Shield Gallery
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #512 on: August 11, 2014, 06:24:53 PM »

Quote

Wyoming?
Most of the time.

good point.  often enough to count; that's for sure.

Mississippi puts one up on occasion these days.
« Last Edit: August 11, 2014, 06:41:12 PM by agentsteel53 »
Logged
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Molandfreak

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1910
  • Age: 28
  • Last Login: Today at 11:34:39 AM
    • Instagram
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #513 on: August 11, 2014, 07:42:53 PM »

I think Iowa has a good amount, too
Logged

agentsteel53

  • invisible hand
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15374
  • long live button copy!

  • Age: 41
  • Location: San Diego, CA
  • Last Login: November 21, 2016, 09:58:39 AM
    • AARoads Shield Gallery
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #514 on: August 11, 2014, 08:36:23 PM »

I think Iowa has a good amount, too

yep.  I feel like someone told me that Iowa has gone to neutered '70 spec, but I may be conflating that with Arkansas.  I know Iowa's US route shields are more recently '70 spec instead of '61, as of the last 5 years or so.

New Mexico uses '57 spec a lot as well, but that's because New Mexico, and not indicative of any set policy.
Logged
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

dariusb

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 240
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Belton, Tx
  • Last Login: January 29, 2023, 08:17:04 PM
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #515 on: August 11, 2014, 08:45:24 PM »

I-69 Advisory Committee Report and Recommendations ... (page 16/30 of pdf; page 10 of report)
The Texarkana MPO has posted its Draft Texarkana Urban Transportation Study ("TUTS") 2015-2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan ("MTP") ....
After a quick scan of the document, I could not find a direct reference to either the West Loop or the Northern Loop.

I recently stumbled across a February 2014 Power Point presentation that includes a slide envisioning "I-69 TXK Western Loop" going to the TexAmericas Center and north of I-30 (continuing as the Northern Loop?):



It looks like the more recent slide envisions a routing slightly to the east of the routing in the previous slide.  It's also interesting that the more recent slide suggests a Northern Loop connection to I-49, which makes sense considering the Intermodal Center part of the slide includes I-30, I-49 and I-69 shields.
When all of these roads/intermodal facility are built there's no telling what future Texarkana/Hooks area will look like.
Logged
It's a new day for a new beginning.

Grzrd

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 3447
  • Interested Observer

  • Location: Atlanta, GA
  • Last Login: August 27, 2020, 03:56:45 PM
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #516 on: August 27, 2014, 03:03:51 PM »

I knew that I-49's wide median would allow for a 75 MPH speed limit to be posted, but I never thought that it could go without the cable barrier.
Are there any plans to talk with Arkansas about making I-49 from the state line to Texarkana as a 75 MPH speed limit?
(above quote from I49 in LA thread)

I don't think Arkansas will post a 75 MPH speed limit, but a 28.9 mile project to install a cable median barrier from the LA state line to Texarkana is scheduled for the November 5 letting:

Quote
County Miller
Route I-49
Job No. 030435
Job Name La. St. Line-Texarkana (Cable Median Barrier)
Type Work (S) Safety
Length 28.9
Cost Range $5 - $10 Million
Logged

AHTD

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 303
  • www.idrivearkansas.com

  • Age: 109
  • Location: Arkansas
  • Last Login: June 21, 2017, 07:31:14 PM
    • AHTD Online
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #517 on: August 27, 2014, 03:17:00 PM »

Arkansas does not have any 75 mph sections.
 
This section between the Louisiana state line and Texarkana will be classified as a rural Interstate and as such the speed limit will be 70 mph and for trucks it will be 65 mph.
 
Look for the last section of this route to be complete toward the early days in November!
 
 
Logged
Travel and construction information available at www.idrivearkansas.com

agentsteel53

  • invisible hand
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15374
  • long live button copy!

  • Age: 41
  • Location: San Diego, CA
  • Last Login: November 21, 2016, 09:58:39 AM
    • AARoads Shield Gallery
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #518 on: August 27, 2014, 03:24:54 PM »

Arkansas does not have any 75 mph sections.

given speed limit increases in Louisiana and Texas recently, I would imagine Arkansas state legislature is looking at the possibility.  any bills in the works?
Logged
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

AHTD

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 303
  • www.idrivearkansas.com

  • Age: 109
  • Location: Arkansas
  • Last Login: June 21, 2017, 07:31:14 PM
    • AHTD Online
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #519 on: August 27, 2014, 03:34:46 PM »

Arkansas does not have any 75 mph sections.

given speed limit increases in Louisiana and Texas recently, I would imagine Arkansas state legislature is looking at the possibility.  any bills in the works?

Nope.
 
That authority rests solely with the Arkansas Highway Commission. Nothing in the works.
 
Logged
Travel and construction information available at www.idrivearkansas.com

agentsteel53

  • invisible hand
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15374
  • long live button copy!

  • Age: 41
  • Location: San Diego, CA
  • Last Login: November 21, 2016, 09:58:39 AM
    • AARoads Shield Gallery
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #520 on: August 27, 2014, 04:25:38 PM »

Nope.
 
That authority rests solely with the Arkansas Highway Commission. Nothing in the works.

well I've got an idea for your bosses...
Logged
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

mcdonaat

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 908
  • Age: 30
  • Location: Pineville, LA
  • Last Login: August 16, 2021, 11:41:11 PM
    • Backroading Louisiana
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #521 on: August 27, 2014, 07:36:21 PM »

Arkansas does not have any 75 mph sections.
 
This section between the Louisiana state line and Texarkana will be classified as a rural Interstate and as such the speed limit will be 70 mph and for trucks it will be 65 mph.
 
Look for the last section of this route to be complete toward the early days in November!
Well, to be honest, it seems like Arkansas will create a speed trap. Slowing down from 75 to 70, with cable barriers in place, seems like a ridiculous thing to do. I'd love to see Texas make I-49 75 or 80 for the small stretch where it crosses state lines.

US71

  • Road Scholar , Master of Snark
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 11835
  • Mad man with a camera

  • Age: 63
  • Location: On the road again
  • Last Login: Today at 02:50:34 PM
    • The Road Less Taken
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #522 on: August 27, 2014, 08:23:20 PM »

Well, to be honest, it seems like Arkansas will create a speed trap. Slowing down from 75 to 70, with cable barriers in place, seems like a ridiculous thing to do. I'd love to see Texas make I-49 75 or 80 for the small stretch where it crosses state lines.
I'm sure there will be Reduced Speed Ahead signs (if any drivers are paying attention)
Logged
Like Alice I Try To Believe Three Impossible Things Before Breakfast

codyg1985

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2209
  • Age: 37
  • Location: Huntsville, AL
  • Last Login: March 25, 2023, 02:40:42 PM
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #523 on: August 28, 2014, 06:32:54 AM »

Before Alabama raised its portion of US 78/Future I-22 to 70 mph from 65 mph, MDOT posted REDUCED SPEED AHEAD signs going eastbound before crossing into Alabama. The speed limit on Mississippi's portion of US 78 has been 70 mph for a while now.
Logged
Cody Goodman
Huntsville, AL, United States

RBBrittain

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 51
  • Location: Little Rock, AR
  • Last Login: December 20, 2017, 08:58:06 PM
Re: Texarkana (Future I-49, I-69 Spur)
« Reply #524 on: October 05, 2014, 03:49:09 AM »

AHTD, is there any more word on the opening of I-49 to Louisiana?  IDriveArkansas only has "Late 2014", and the main site is down right now.  Does "November" mean just before the election (so President Obama, Secretary Foxx, etc. can stump for both Mark Pryor & Mary Landrieu), or just after it (so both Pryor & Tom Cotton can take credit while keeping a straight face, while the President, Secretary, etc. stumps for Landrieu in her likely runoff)?
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.