Illinois isn't flat

[SkyPesos]

Arapahoe County is not flat.

Hm?

You missed this little bump in the road. Proves that a place is not flat.

[NE2]

Illinois has the Shawnee Hills and Illinois Ozarks.

Which are haunted! http://www.facebook.com/thehauntedwoodssh/

[LilianaUwU]

I want to hear more about how bridges on the Chicago Skyway factor into Illinois not being flat.

Basically, manmade structures being high up in the sky = the state itself being hilly... or that's what I'm understanding from the flawed logic.

Or "flawless logic"  perhaps?

It's both a flawed logic and a flawless logic. (My name comes from a necromancer in Magic: the Gathering, so I might as well embrace it and revive dead forum memes.)

[Crash_It]

I wanted to check for myself where the highest point in the state is, and it stands at only 1200 feet tall. Pretty flat if you ask me.

Of course, terrain can be hilly, but that's true of pretty much everywhere. You won't get 100% level terrain anywhere.

Charles Mound in Jo Daviess County which I said awhile back is probably the most scenic county in the state. The high point in Illinois is only about a half mile south of the Wisconsin border too.

You would think that when your state's only scenic county is wedged between two other states, you would understand that Illinois is not scenic.

There's way more than one scenic county. When my I70 video is released this week (making all the signs now) you'll see that.

I've been on I-70 in Illinois and there is nothing scenic about it so your video isn't going to show that.

There's hilly terrain in many stretches throughout... notably between Greenup and Marshall and between Troy and Vandalia.

[Flint1979]

I wanted to check for myself where the highest point in the state is, and it stands at only 1200 feet tall. Pretty flat if you ask me.

Of course, terrain can be hilly, but that's true of pretty much everywhere. You won't get 100% level terrain anywhere.

Charles Mound in Jo Daviess County which I said awhile back is probably the most scenic county in the state. The high point in Illinois is only about a half mile south of the Wisconsin border too.

You would think that when your state's only scenic county is wedged between two other states, you would understand that Illinois is not scenic.

There's way more than one scenic county. When my I70 video is released this week (making all the signs now) you'll see that.

I've been on I-70 in Illinois and there is nothing scenic about it so your video isn't going to show that.

There's hilly terrain in many stretches throughout... notably between Greenup and Marshall and between Troy and Vandalia.

Once again I have been on I-70 in Illinois, there is nothing scenic about it and there is not hilly terrain in many stretches throughout that is incorrect.

[Max Rockatansky]

I want to hear more about how bridges on the Chicago Skyway factor into Illinois not being flat.

Basically, manmade structures being high up in the sky = the state itself being hilly... or that's what I'm understanding from the flawed logic.

Or "flawless logic"  perhaps?

It's both a flawed logic and a flawless logic. (My name comes from a necromancer in Magic: the Gathering, so I might as well embrace it and revive dead forum memes.)

So basically it's flawlessly flawed logic.  I think Goat Jesus would be enthusiastically mortified by the inglorious splendor of the geography of Illinois. 

[renegade]

Arapahoe County is not flat.

Hm?

Wow ... could've mistaken that for Illinois.

[NE2]

Not flat!

[bing101]

Arapahoe County is not flat.

Hm?

You missed this little bump in the road. Proves that a place is not flat.

Flat by San Joaquin Valley standards.

Not flat!

Flat by Hawaiian islands criteria.

[Max Rockatansky]

Guys if you are going to do flat California make sure you at least get CA 43 and CA 137 in the mix:

https://www.flickr.com/gp/151828809@N08/VBoU6C

https://www.flickr.com/gp/151828809@N08/20qSi1

[Crash_It]

I wanted to check for myself where the highest point in the state is, and it stands at only 1200 feet tall. Pretty flat if you ask me.

Of course, terrain can be hilly, but that's true of pretty much everywhere. You won't get 100% level terrain anywhere.

Charles Mound in Jo Daviess County which I said awhile back is probably the most scenic county in the state. The high point in Illinois is only about a half mile south of the Wisconsin border too.

You would think that when your state's only scenic county is wedged between two other states, you would understand that Illinois is not scenic.

There's way more than one scenic county. When my I70 video is released this week (making all the signs now) you'll see that.

I've been on I-70 in Illinois and there is nothing scenic about it so your video isn't going to show that.

There's hilly terrain in many stretches throughout... notably between Greenup and Marshall and between Troy and Vandalia.

Once again I have been on I-70 in Illinois, there is nothing scenic about it and there is not hilly terrain in many stretches throughout that is incorrect.

Here's a portion between Pocahontas and Stubblefield on the topographic view on Google maps



here's another between Martinsville and Marshall




and finally, Troy and Highland



Plus, I have family in this area and used to date someone as well.  Both of their neighborhoods were very hilly. If you've driven in this area, there's no possible way that you can tell me that it's flat.

[Max Rockatansky]

I wanted to check for myself where the highest point in the state is, and it stands at only 1200 feet tall. Pretty flat if you ask me.

Of course, terrain can be hilly, but that's true of pretty much everywhere. You won't get 100% level terrain anywhere.

Charles Mound in Jo Daviess County which I said awhile back is probably the most scenic county in the state. The high point in Illinois is only about a half mile south of the Wisconsin border too.

You would think that when your state's only scenic county is wedged between two other states, you would understand that Illinois is not scenic.

There's way more than one scenic county. When my I70 video is released this week (making all the signs now) you'll see that.

I've been on I-70 in Illinois and there is nothing scenic about it so your video isn't going to show that.

There's hilly terrain in many stretches throughout... notably between Greenup and Marshall and between Troy and Vandalia.

Once again I have been on I-70 in Illinois, there is nothing scenic about it and there is not hilly terrain in many stretches throughout that is incorrect.

Here's a portion between Pocahontas and Stubblefield on the topographic view on Google maps



here's another between Martinsville and Marshall




and finally, Troy and Highland



Plus, I have family in this area and used to date someone as well.  Both of their neighborhoods were very hilly. If you've driven in this area, there's no possible way that you can tell me that it's flat.

It's flat.  See, totally possible.

[bing101]

I wanted to check for myself where the highest point in the state is, and it stands at only 1200 feet tall. Pretty flat if you ask me.

Of course, terrain can be hilly, but that's true of pretty much everywhere. You won't get 100% level terrain anywhere.

Charles Mound in Jo Daviess County which I said awhile back is probably the most scenic county in the state. The high point in Illinois is only about a half mile south of the Wisconsin border too.

You would think that when your state's only scenic county is wedged between two other states, you would understand that Illinois is not scenic.

There's way more than one scenic county. When my I70 video is released this week (making all the signs now) you'll see that.

I've been on I-70 in Illinois and there is nothing scenic about it so your video isn't going to show that.

There's hilly terrain in many stretches throughout... notably between Greenup and Marshall and between Troy and Vandalia.

Once again I have been on I-70 in Illinois, there is nothing scenic about it and there is not hilly terrain in many stretches throughout that is incorrect.

Here's a portion between Pocahontas and Stubblefield on the topographic view on Google maps



here's another between Martinsville and Marshall




and finally, Troy and Highland



Plus, I have family in this area and used to date someone as well.  Both of their neighborhoods were very hilly. If you've driven in this area, there's no possible way that you can tell me that it's flat.

It's flat.  See, totally possible.

Street view is flat.

[LilianaUwU]

I wanted to check for myself where the highest point in the state is, and it stands at only 1200 feet tall. Pretty flat if you ask me.

Of course, terrain can be hilly, but that's true of pretty much everywhere. You won't get 100% level terrain anywhere.

Charles Mound in Jo Daviess County which I said awhile back is probably the most scenic county in the state. The high point in Illinois is only about a half mile south of the Wisconsin border too.

You would think that when your state's only scenic county is wedged between two other states, you would understand that Illinois is not scenic.

There's way more than one scenic county. When my I70 video is released this week (making all the signs now) you'll see that.

I've been on I-70 in Illinois and there is nothing scenic about it so your video isn't going to show that.

There's hilly terrain in many stretches throughout... notably between Greenup and Marshall and between Troy and Vandalia.

Once again I have been on I-70 in Illinois, there is nothing scenic about it and there is not hilly terrain in many stretches throughout that is incorrect.

Here's a portion between Pocahontas and Stubblefield on the topographic view on Google maps

(pic)

here's another between Martinsville and Marshall

(pic)


and finally, Troy and Highland

(pic)

Plus, I have family in this area and used to date someone as well.  Both of their neighborhoods were very hilly. If you've driven in this area, there's no possible way that you can tell me that it's flat.

Just because there's hills doesn't mean the state itself isn't flat. Compared to, say, Montana, Illinois is as flat as a soda can left opened for weeks.

[Scott5114]

This is starting to remind me of an inverse sharks are smooth as hell.

[LilianaUwU]

This is starting to remind me of an inverse sharks are smooth as hell.

But sharks are smooth!

[Max Rockatansky]

This is starting to remind me of an inverse sharks are smooth as hell.

But sharks are smooth!

Sharks aren't smooth, they have pointy teeth which breaks up their smoothness distribution.

[hotdogPi]

From another thread, but applies here, too (and you should really read the page of the thread I linked, pure comedy gold)

Good news, RGT. This thread made it further than your other thread. The train has left the station on this one too, though.

You might say it has jumped the shark.

[Max Rockatansky]

That would insinuate there was a shark to actually jump over.

[hbelkins]

That would insinuate there was a shark to actually jump over.

Somewhere last week, I saw a map of shark attacks. Surprisingly, some shark attacks were reported in states like Kentucky and Missouri. At first, people thought there were sharks that had navigated up from the Gulf of Mexico, but turns out the attacks happened in aquarium settings. They were still cataloged, though.

So maybe there are sharks in flat Illinois.

[LilianaUwU]

That would insinuate there was a shark to actually jump over.

Somewhere last week, I saw a map of shark attacks. Surprisingly, some shark attacks were reported in states like Kentucky and Missouri. At first, people thought there were sharks that had navigated up from the Gulf of Mexico, but turns out the attacks happened in aquarium settings. They were still cataloged, though.

So maybe there are sharks in flat Illinois.

I mean, whether it's in an aquarium or not, a shark attack is a shark attack.

[Max Rockatansky]

That would insinuate there was a shark to actually jump over.

Somewhere last week, I saw a map of shark attacks. Surprisingly, some shark attacks were reported in states like Kentucky and Missouri. At first, people thought there were sharks that had navigated up from the Gulf of Mexico, but turns out the attacks happened in aquarium settings. They were still cataloged, though.

So maybe there are sharks in flat Illinois.

I mean, whether it's in an aquarium or not, a shark attack is a shark attack.

So you guys are saying that Crash is going to get eaten by a shark on the desolate plains of flat Illinois?

[hotdogPi]

Enough is enough! I've had it with these made-for-forum sharks on this motor-friendly plain!

[Flint1979]

Omg there are a few hills so what? The rest of the state is flat. The shithole known as Illinois is 55,000 square miles, a few hills here and there doesn't mean that the state is hilly.

[LilianaUwU]

That would insinuate there was a shark to actually jump over.

Somewhere last week, I saw a map of shark attacks. Surprisingly, some shark attacks were reported in states like Kentucky and Missouri. At first, people thought there were sharks that had navigated up from the Gulf of Mexico, but turns out the attacks happened in aquarium settings. They were still cataloged, though.

So maybe there are sharks in flat Illinois.

I mean, whether it's in an aquarium or not, a shark attack is a shark attack.

So you guys are saying that Crash is going to get eaten by a shark on the desolate plains of flat Illinois?

You never know when a shark typhoon might strike.