AARoads Forum

Regional Boards => Great Lakes and Ohio Valley => Topic started by: A.J. Bertin on April 30, 2013, 12:39:44 PM

Title: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: A.J. Bertin on April 30, 2013, 12:39:44 PM
This came up on another thread. Almost all freeways ("expressways") in the Chicago area have a designated name to them: Kennedy, Eisenhower, Stevenson, Dan Ryan, etc. I was just wondering... why doesn't I-57 have a name?

Any ideas?
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: kkt on April 30, 2013, 12:50:30 PM
Quote from: A.J. Bertin on April 30, 2013, 12:39:44 PM
This came up on another thread. Almost all freeways ("expressways") in the Chicago area have a designated name to them: Kennedy, Eisenhower, Stevenson, Dan Ryan, etc. I was just wondering... why doesn't I-57 have a name?

Any ideas?

Maybe they're saving it for Obama?
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: Brandon on April 30, 2013, 01:13:31 PM
It is a named expressway, but the name, like that of I-80 (Moline Expy), is rarely used.

I-57 is the West Leg of the Dan Ryan Expressway.  It could be considered a southward extension of the Ryan, but the name is not used.  My guess is to differentiate between the main stem of the Ryan (I-90/94) and the West Leg (I-57), the name is never used.
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: NE2 on April 30, 2013, 01:14:15 PM
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=9366.msg218571#msg218571
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: US 41 on May 02, 2013, 08:41:32 AM

[/quote]

Maybe they're saving it for Obama?
[/quote]

God I hope not.
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: Brandon on May 02, 2013, 10:04:18 AM
Quote from: NE2 on April 30, 2013, 01:14:15 PM
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=9366.msg218571#msg218571

And AJ thought it would be better in its own thread after posting.  I agree.
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: hobsini2 on May 03, 2013, 02:13:16 PM
Quote from: US 41 on May 02, 2013, 08:41:32 AM


Maybe they're saving it for Obama?
[/quote]

God I hope not.
[/quote]

There is already an "Obama Dr" in the area being used on 127th St in Calumet Park which does go over I-57.  The signage on I-57 does not reflect it but the actual surface street does with a very tiny "127th Street" in the top left corner of the sign.  So I highly doubt that the state, politics aside, will apply Obama Frwy to I-57 ever.
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: N9JIG on June 24, 2013, 06:33:37 PM
Quote from: hobsini2 on May 03, 2013, 02:13:16 PM
Quote from: US 41 on May 02, 2013, 08:41:32 AM


Maybe they're saving it for Obama?

God I hope not.
[/quote]

There is already an "Obama Dr" in the area being used on 127th St in Calumet Park which does go over I-57.  The signage on I-57 does not reflect it but the actual surface street does with a very tiny "127th Street" in the top left corner of the sign.  So I highly doubt that the state, politics aside, will apply Obama Frwy to I-57 ever.
[/quote]

Not that I support renaming I-57 or any other road after Obama (or any other president), there is no reason why naming a surface street after him would prevent the expressway from being named for him too.
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: hobsini2 on June 24, 2013, 07:20:37 PM
N9JIG, think of it this way. How many times does that already exist where a freeway name has an interchange or an overpass  with an arterial street that has the same name. I can't think of any off hand. This would be an interesting question to answer in the general talk section.
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: SEWIGuy on June 25, 2013, 10:24:37 AM
Chicago's first President is going to have a bunch of stuff named after him in that city when all is said and done.  I wouldn't doubt that a highway of some sort is one of those things. 
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: Henry on June 25, 2013, 10:58:04 AM
Quote from: SEWIGuy on June 25, 2013, 10:24:37 AM
Chicago's first President is going to have a bunch of stuff named after him in that city when all is said and done.  I wouldn't doubt that a highway of some sort is one of those things. 
It'll be very hard to disagree with that statement!
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: Rick Powell on June 25, 2013, 05:52:37 PM
Quote from: hobsini2 on June 24, 2013, 07:20:37 PM
N9JIG, think of it this way. How many times does that already exist where a freeway name has an interchange or an overpass  with an arterial street that has the same name. I can't think of any off hand. This would be an interesting question to answer in the general talk section.

Oswego IL has a Douglas Street and a Douglas Road, both of substantial length.  I wonder if anyone ever gets their mail mixed up? 
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: N9JIG on June 25, 2013, 06:38:16 PM
Heck, Illinois even had 2 routes with the same number crossing each other for a while. When IL-5 was rechristened I-88 on the East-West Tollway (Now the Reagan...) it crossed IL-88 for a couple years before IL-88 was changed to IL-40.

President Reagan has 2 highways named after him in Illinois, US-14 from Chicago to Harvard and the aforementioned I-88. They don't cross however.
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: Revive 755 on June 25, 2013, 08:14:30 PM
Quote from: N9JIG on June 25, 2013, 06:38:16 PM
President Reagan has 2 highways named after him in Illinois, US-14 from Chicago to Harvard and the aforementioned I-88. They don't cross however.

Isn't there also a "Ronald Reagan Trail" somewhere in IL?
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: 3467 on June 25, 2013, 08:30:55 PM
Yes I am not sure exactly where it goes but it runs through Galesburg and ends in Monmouth
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: NE2 on June 25, 2013, 08:46:26 PM
Nothing for Bonzo though.
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: kphoger on June 25, 2013, 09:42:17 PM
Quote from: hobsini2 on June 24, 2013, 07:20:37 PM
N9JIG, think of it this way. How many times does that already exist where a freeway name has an interchange or an overpass  with an arterial street that has the same name. I can't think of any off hand. This would be an interesting question to answer in the general talk section.

Close, but no cigar:  http://goo.gl/maps/p7w5Q
Technically, the Turnpike has an interchange with Turnpike Drive, but the exit is signed for K-15.
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: N9JIG on June 25, 2013, 09:58:58 PM
Quote

Isn't there also a "Ronald Reagan Trail" somewhere in IL?

Yes, this is one of those brown-signed routes that runs N-S thru north central IL, partly on IL-26. It is not a route designation in the numbering sense, more like the Great River Road etc.
Title: Re: Why isn't I-57 in Chicago a named "expressway"?
Post by: hobsini2 on June 30, 2013, 07:26:55 PM
Rick, Douglas St and Douglas Rd in Oswego is not the type of case I was asking for.  There are several instances were minor roads with the same name cross. Hell I even know of (also in Oswego) where Manhattan Circle meets Manhattan Circle at a 4 way intersection.

N9JIG, as far as highway numbers that are the same, again, not what I was asking for. That also occurs in several places.

KP has come the closest with what I was looking for.