AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules to ensure post quality. See this thread for details.

Poll

Which do you perfer?

First link
- 2 (33.3%)
Second link
- 4 (66.7%)

Total Members Voted: 6


Author Topic: Which type of pavement markings on concrete highways do you perfer?  (Read 563 times)

tolbs17

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4630
  • Age: 19
  • Location: Greenville, NC
  • Last Login: March 31, 2022, 07:24:24 PM
« Last Edit: January 18, 2022, 01:13:46 AM by tolbs17 »
Logged

CtrlAltDel

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1853
  • Location: Central Texas
  • Last Login: May 15, 2022, 05:10:44 PM
Re: Which type of pavement markings on concrete highways do you perfer?
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2022, 02:25:33 AM »

Logged
Interstates clinched: 4, 57, 275 (IN-KY-OH), 465 (IN), 640 (TN), 985
State Interstates clinched: I-26 (TN), I-75 (GA), I-75 (KY), I-75 (TN), I-81 (WV), I-95 (NH)

tolbs17

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4630
  • Age: 19
  • Location: Greenville, NC
  • Last Login: March 31, 2022, 07:24:24 PM
Re: Which type of pavement markings on concrete highways do you perfer?
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2022, 02:47:21 AM »

https://www.google.com/maps/@35.3656433,-80.7587316,3a,40y,308.89h,82.68t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s9dF6TkRx30uoqRpnqYG5Bg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D9dF6TkRx30uoqRpnqYG5Bg%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D112.16265%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192


https://www.google.com/maps/@36.0417692,-79.8932598,3a,90y,317.16h,78.62t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sFTJrXe2CL6Le9Yz1gWRvZA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DFTJrXe2CL6Le9Yz1gWRvZA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D67.25606%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192


I'll go with the second one since I can see the black more clearer.

Also, I've never seen NCDOT do this on a bridge approach and I'm referring to the solid yellow and white lines. I like them, but maybe they deemed that it's unnecessary but I think they should go on and do it. It makes it more visible.

https://www.google.com/maps/@36.694632,-77.5538607,3a,28y,27.21h,80.81t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1s35ueNXnIkW0hjkasCOlVhQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D35ueNXnIkW0hjkasCOlVhQ%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D105.10969%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192

I prefer the third. It's like the first one, but the side stripes seem a bit wider. Having the black stripe after seems weird to me.
Well in recent rehab projects that NCDOT has done, those are coming out more. And for here I'll take your vote as you like the first link better.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.