AARoads Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New rules to ensure post quality. See this thread for details.

Author Topic: I-781 requested in New York  (Read 18285 times)

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12610
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 18, 2023, 01:53:05 PM
    • Froggie's Place
I-781 requested in New York
« on: October 05, 2009, 06:48:16 AM »

New York has requested that the under-construction connector between I-81 and the Fort Drum main gate be designated as I-781.  They already have preliminary approval from FHWA.  This is the request to AASHTO.
Logged

Mergingtraffic

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 2010
  • Location: NYC-CT
  • Last Login: March 20, 2023, 10:59:54 PM
    • My Flickr alias: MergingTraffic
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2009, 07:28:53 PM »

I saw the plans on the web and I'm surprised the interchange with I-81 is a trumpet not flyovers...I thought trumpet were frowned upon nowadays.
Logged
I only take pics of good looking signs. Long live non-reflective button copy!
MergingTraffic https://www.flickr.com/photos/98731835@N05/

vdeane

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 13636
  • Age: 32
  • Location: The 518
  • Last Login: March 20, 2023, 09:46:44 PM
    • New York State Roads
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2009, 09:19:12 PM »

If the designation actually extends to Fort Drum (rather than just to US 11), I see difficulties in clinching it.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2009, 09:52:18 PM by deanej »
Logged
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

flaroads

  • Admin/FDOT
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 893
  • Location: Tampa, FL
  • Last Login: March 20, 2023, 09:01:34 PM
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2009, 09:38:45 PM »

Perhaps the interstate designation will end at U.S. 11 with the state route continuing into Fort Drum, or not be signed at all. Either way its nice to see a new interstate number on the books  :clap:  :clap:  :clap:
Logged

agentsteel53

  • invisible hand
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15374
  • long live button copy!

  • Age: 41
  • Location: San Diego, CA
  • Last Login: November 21, 2016, 09:58:39 AM
    • AARoads Shield Gallery
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2009, 09:43:51 PM »

If the designation actually extends into Fort Drum (rather than just to US 11), I see difficulties in clinching it.

Is that even legally allowed, to have an interstate with such access restrictions?

H-3 in Hawaii ends at the gates of the Marine base.  I clinched it with an "I'm sorry, sir, I seem to be lost.  Can you please direct me to Honolulu?"
Logged
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

Alps

  • y u m
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15351
  • Elimitante the truck trarffic,

  • Age: 40
  • Location: New Jersey
  • Last Login: Today at 12:50:24 AM
    • Alps' Roads
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2009, 10:25:09 PM »

I've clinched a few routes (especially in MD) just by U-turning at the gates.  The only route I know of that extends into the establishment itself is NJ 68 and Fort Dix.

Duke87

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5867
  • Age: 35
  • Location: Stamford, CT
  • Last Login: Today at 12:29:29 AM
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2009, 10:55:20 PM »

From the report:

Quote
It is proposed that Interstate 781 would end at the Fort Drum boundary at the location of the North Gate (main
gate).

So, yup, another U-turner.
Logged
If you always take the same road, you will never see anything new.

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12610
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 18, 2023, 01:53:05 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2009, 07:02:07 AM »

Quote
I saw the plans on the web and I'm surprised the interchange with I-81 is a trumpet not flyovers...I thought trumpet were frowned upon nowadays.

Most of the traffic is expected to be to/from the south, hence why the trumpet was considered acceptable.


Quote
Is that even legally allowed, to have an interstate with such access restrictions?

Yes it's allowed.  Consider, in part, that Defense was an integral part of the Interstate's creation.
Logged

mgk920

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 4824
  • Location: Appleton, WI USA
  • Last Login: March 20, 2023, 11:55:11 PM
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2009, 10:59:53 AM »

Quote
Is that even legally allowed, to have an interstate with such access restrictions?

Yes it's allowed.  Consider, in part, that Defense was an integral part of the Interstate's creation.

Also, I-564 in VA.

Mike
Logged

Alex

  • Webmaster
  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 5114
  • Location: Tampa, FL
  • Last Login: March 19, 2023, 11:10:18 AM
    • AARoads
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #9 on: October 06, 2009, 09:50:10 PM »

The rest of the topic has been moved to General Highway Talk under the heading "Restricted Highways".

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=1751.0

Figured this has migrated away from the scope of just future Interstate 781 and deserved its own thread.

Roadgeek Adam

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1289
  • Warren CR 14 - Warrensburg, NY

  • Age: 32
  • Location: East Amherst, New York
  • Last Login: March 20, 2023, 09:33:44 PM
    • My Flickr Photostream
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2009, 06:22:29 AM »

I really don't know why NY 781 (which it was designated originally) should be an interstate. If it was interstate for a short point, and an NY state touring route for the rest (to the gate), maybe it would make more sense.
Logged
Adam Seth Moss
M.A. History, Western Illinois University '17
B.A. History, Montclair State University '15
A.A. History & Education - Middlesex (County) College '13

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12610
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 18, 2023, 01:53:05 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #11 on: October 07, 2009, 07:04:00 AM »

Why not?  After all, it's the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, and 781 directly connects the main gate at Fort Drum (which has seen a lot of expansion in recent years) to a major Interstate.

Makes perfect sense to me...
Logged

agentsteel53

  • invisible hand
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 15374
  • long live button copy!

  • Age: 41
  • Location: San Diego, CA
  • Last Login: November 21, 2016, 09:58:39 AM
    • AARoads Shield Gallery
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #12 on: October 07, 2009, 12:19:32 PM »

it certainly beats having some commuter lemming path being upgraded to yet another generic three-digit interstate!  :ded:
Logged
live from sunny San Diego.

http://shields.aaroads.com

jake@aaroads.com

yakra

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1306
  • Location: Area Code 207, bub!
  • Last Login: March 19, 2023, 01:58:14 AM
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2009, 08:14:05 PM »

Quote
Is that even legally allowed, to have an interstate with such access restrictions?

Yes it's allowed.  Consider, in part, that Defense was an integral part of the Interstate's creation.

Isn't there a requirement to terminate at other NHS routes?
Logged
"Officer, I'm always careful to drive the speed limit no matter where I am and that's what I was doin'." Said "No, you weren't," she said, "Yes, I was." He said, "Madam, I just clocked you at 22 MPH," and she said "That's the speed limit," he said "No ma'am, that's the route numbah!"  - Gary Crocker

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12610
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 18, 2023, 01:53:05 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2009, 09:07:47 PM »

Not outright.  Again, this is a major military base.  Thus, quite allowed and makes a lot of sense.

'Sides, US 11 through there is on the NHS... :pan:
Logged

vdeane

  • *
  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 13636
  • Age: 32
  • Location: The 518
  • Last Login: March 20, 2023, 09:46:44 PM
    • New York State Roads
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2009, 04:45:29 PM »

It won't be ending at US 11; it's planned to end at the main gate to Fort Drum, last I heard.
Logged
Please note: All comments here represent my own personal opinion and do not reflect the official position of NYSDOT or its affiliates.

Roadgeek Adam

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 1289
  • Warren CR 14 - Warrensburg, NY

  • Age: 32
  • Location: East Amherst, New York
  • Last Login: March 20, 2023, 09:33:44 PM
    • My Flickr Photostream
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #16 on: October 28, 2009, 05:39:27 PM »

Yes it is and will be. I don't agree with the interstate designation, but I won't win that fight.
Logged
Adam Seth Moss
M.A. History, Western Illinois University '17
B.A. History, Montclair State University '15
A.A. History & Education - Middlesex (County) College '13

njroadhorse

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 958
  • Going wherever the roads take me

  • Location: North Jersey/Blacksburg, VA
  • Last Login: February 03, 2016, 07:05:44 PM
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2009, 07:19:08 PM »

Hey, if I-564 can be signed as such, I suppose I-781 can too.  After all, they both serve major defensive areas for this country.  I believe I-564 is also signed to the main gate of Norfolk Naval Station too, no?
Logged
NJ Roads FTW!
I-99... the Glen Quagmire of interstate routes??

froggie

  • *
  • Offline Offline

  • Posts: 12610
  • Location: Greensboro, VT
  • Last Login: March 18, 2023, 01:53:05 PM
    • Froggie's Place
Re: I-781 requested in New York
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2009, 08:43:28 PM »

No.  Ties into the at-grade part of Taussig Blvd (outside the base boundary) just west of the Gate 3/3A interchange, and officially becomes VA 337 at that point.
Logged

 


Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.