News:

The AARoads Wiki is live! Come check it out!

Main Menu

Erroneous road signs

Started by FLRoads, January 20, 2009, 04:01:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Quillz

Maybe if cutouts were still around, this wouldn't happen as much.


machias

Quote from: Quillz on July 22, 2016, 12:02:47 PM
Maybe if cutouts were still around, this wouldn't happen as much.

I completely agree with this. People have come to associate computers with mediocrity. Using computers for sign design and manufacturing has led to many more errors being discovered in the field.

74/171FAN

#3977
No personal photos for either, but there were circle US 29 shields for the detours associated with the Rio Road grade-separated intersection.  (note that the linked photo is from VDOT's Flickr)

Also I saw a PA 322 shield at the linked location this afternoon.  (in Cornwall east of the PA 72 duplex)

EDIT:  Today I saw PA 209 in Tamaqua while clinching roads in PA instead of at some meet in CT.
I am now a PennDOT employee.  My opinions/views do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of PennDOT.

roadman

Quote from: bob7374 on July 21, 2016, 10:40:17 AM
Quote from: mass_citizen on July 18, 2016, 11:53:32 PM


Fresh install on I-93 SB, Medford, MA just after the MA-38 exit. It is part of the RTTM statewide project, the time displays are not active yet. Based on my odometer, the Zakim bridge should read "3 MI"

As usual, the contractor that put this sign in did not stop and wonder how the Mass Ave exit which is on the complete opposite end of the artery tunnel could be the same distance as the Zakim. 
This is a contractor error, not MassDOT's, the original sign plan lists 5 miles to the Mass Ave exit. Here's the sign drawing:
As of Monday morning, the sign has been fixed.  http://www.universalhub.com/2016/state-changes-sign-times
"And ninety-five is the route you were on.  It was not the speed limit sign."  - Jim Croce (from Speedball Tucker)

"My life has been a tapestry
Of years of roads and highway signs" (with apologies to Carole King and Tom Rush)

Quillz

Is the 987 supposed to be a US route shield? It's like a double error.

national highway 1

Quote from: Quillz on July 25, 2016, 11:07:41 PM
Is the 987 supposed to be a US route shield? It's like a double error.
No, it is meant to be a keystone shield for PA 987.
"Set up road signs; put up guideposts. Take note of the highway, the road that you take." Jeremiah 31:21

formulanone

Quote from: national highway 1 on July 26, 2016, 02:04:49 AM
Quote from: Quillz on July 25, 2016, 11:07:41 PM
Is the 987 supposed to be a US route shield? It's like a double error.
No, it is meant to be a keystone shield for PA 987.

Hopefully, this one was still standing:


formulanone

Quote from: Hoss6884 on July 26, 2016, 07:17:34 AM
Quote from: formulanone on July 26, 2016, 07:13:28 AM
Hopefully, this one was still standing:



Where is that one located?  I'm staying across the street from the airport and can check it out.

I think there's two access roads that leave the Allentown Airport, the main exit point which has the ugly 987, but another one (Postal Road) has the button copy sign.

cbeach40

#3983
Quote from: 7/8 on July 17, 2016, 06:05:55 PM
Signs on the 401 and 407 for Hurontario St call it "Highway 10", even though Highway 10 was decommissioned in Brampton and Mississauga for two decades now. Here's a picture I took for the 407 exit for Hurontario St. I know a lot of people still call it highway 10, but it's still incorrect.



That's not so much an error as just old.

Quote from: 7/8 on July 14, 2016, 09:44:55 PM
I believe the sign on the left on Victoria St/Hwy 7 in Kitchener is technically not correct.

The Hwy 7 shield here is a junction shield, but I think it should instead be like this shield below.

No it's correct. Just not the ideal set-up, but still acceptable.
and waterrrrrrr!

Quillz

Quote from: national highway 1 on July 26, 2016, 02:04:49 AM
Quote from: Quillz on July 25, 2016, 11:07:41 PM
Is the 987 supposed to be a US route shield? It's like a double error.
No, it is meant to be a keystone shield for PA 987.
Wow, then they failed even harder.

jbnati27

Here's a fairly new sign fail after some recent construction on US-50 in Marathon, OH

epzik8

This Pennsylvania Route 222 shield should be a U.S. Route 222 shield.


This Maryland Route 29 shield should be a U.S. Route 29 shield.
From the land of red, white, yellow and black.
____________________________

My clinched highways: http://tm.teresco.org/user/?u=epzik8
My clinched counties: http://mob-rule.com/user-gifs/USA/epzik8.gif

74/171FAN

US 743 has come to Hershey (there are a few of these around the intersection on Park Ave)
I am now a PennDOT employee.  My opinions/views do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of PennDOT.

epzik8

This U.S. 322 shield in West Chester, Pennsylvania should say U.S. 322 Business. Mainline U.S. 322 bypasses West Chester to the north and east in a duplex with U.S. 202.
From the land of red, white, yellow and black.
____________________________

My clinched highways: http://tm.teresco.org/user/?u=epzik8
My clinched counties: http://mob-rule.com/user-gifs/USA/epzik8.gif

noelbotevera

Pleased to meet you
Hope you guessed my name

(Recently hacked. A human operates this account now!)

epzik8

Quote from: noelbotevera on August 10, 2016, 12:35:40 AM
No, that's not the right order.

There's a similar sign along MD-276 north in Cecil County, Maryland. Lancaster, Pennsylvania is on this sign because this is part of Truck Route 222, and many truck drivers heading north toward Lancaster from I-95 use the truck route. However, Lancaster should be below Rising Sun.
From the land of red, white, yellow and black.
____________________________

My clinched highways: http://tm.teresco.org/user/?u=epzik8
My clinched counties: http://mob-rule.com/user-gifs/USA/epzik8.gif

roadfro

Quote from: noelbotevera on August 10, 2016, 12:35:40 AM
No, that's not the right order.

In this case, I think the wrong order can be attributed to San Francisco being a major traffic destination for I-5 north (but is reached via intersecting I-580 before getting near Sacramento), whereas Sacramento is the control city for I-5 north.
Roadfro - AARoads Pacific Southwest moderator since 2010, Nevada roadgeek since 1983.

7/8

This "pavement ends" sign (on the right) is upside down. It incorrectly says that the pavement starts behind the sign. I took this photo today on Woolwich St at Wismer Ct in Waterloo, ON. I've let my boss know, so it should be fixed soon :)


amroad17

Quote from: epzik8 on August 10, 2016, 02:41:23 AM
Quote from: noelbotevera on August 10, 2016, 12:35:40 AM
No, that's not the right order.

There's a similar sign along MD-276 north in Cecil County, Maryland. Lancaster, Pennsylvania is on this sign because this is part of Truck Route 222, and many truck drivers heading north toward Lancaster from I-95 use the truck route. However, Lancaster should be below Rising Sun.

There is a mileage sign on I-71/75 southbound in Florence, KY displaying the following (in Clearview):

           Louisville      88
           Lexington     71

This is south of Exit 180 for those who may want to view it on Google Maps.
I don't need a GPS.  I AM the GPS! (for family and friends)

74/171FAN

Quote from: noelbotevera on June 13, 2016, 05:01:04 PM
After 2013 the US 30/PA 234 intersection had the signs replaced for...reasons. So it had the first branch route of US 34, US 234! While US 30 had the correct shield.

Speaking of US 34, it has shown up in Adams County as well.  (2015 GSV)
I am now a PennDOT employee.  My opinions/views do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of PennDOT.

paulthemapguy

Quote from: 74/171FAN on August 11, 2016, 10:47:09 PM
Quote from: noelbotevera on June 13, 2016, 05:01:04 PM
After 2013 the US 30/PA 234 intersection had the signs replaced for...reasons. So it had the first branch route of US 34, US 234! While US 30 had the correct shield.

Speaking of US 34, it has shown up in Adams County as well.  (2015 GSV)
This sight really spun me out, because I live near the actual junction of US30 and US34 in Oswego, IL.  I was like "US30 and US34 crossing?  What's wrong with that?" hehehh
Avatar is the last interesting highway I clinched.
My website! http://www.paulacrossamerica.com Now featuring all of Ohio!
My USA Shield Gallery https://flic.kr/s/aHsmHwJRZk
TM Clinches https://bit.ly/2UwRs4O

National collection status: 391/425. Only 34 route markers remain!

74/171FAN

Quote from: paulthemapguy on August 11, 2016, 11:26:28 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on August 11, 2016, 10:47:09 PM
Quote from: noelbotevera on June 13, 2016, 05:01:04 PM
After 2013 the US 30/PA 234 intersection had the signs replaced for...reasons. So it had the first branch route of US 34, US 234! While US 30 had the correct shield.

Speaking of US 34, it has shown up in Adams County as well.  (2015 GSV)
This sight really spun me out, because I live near the actual junction of US30 and US34 in Oswego, IL.  I was like "US30 and US34 crossing?  What's wrong with that?" hehehh

Actually US 30 and PA 34 do not intersect each other at all.  PA 34 begins at US 15 BUS farther north at the intersection of Lincoln Ave and Carlisle St.
I am now a PennDOT employee.  My opinions/views do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of PennDOT.

freebrickproductions

Found this in Gallatin, TN, should be a TN 109 shield:
Erroneous "KY" 109 Shield by freebrickproductions, on Flickr
Erroneous "KY" 109 Shield by freebrickproductions, on Flickr

Apparently Kentucky tried to invade Tennessee once upon a time.
It's all fun & games until someone summons Cthulhu and brings about the end of the world.

I also collect traffic lights, road signs, fans, and railroad crossing equipment.

(They/Them)

tckma

Quote from: 74/171FAN on August 11, 2016, 10:47:09 PM
Speaking of US 34, it has shown up in Adams County as well.  (2015 GSV)

I think I'm having déjà vù... see my post from April 21...

tckma

Quote from: freebrickproductions on August 12, 2016, 01:16:29 AM
Found this in Gallatin, TN, should be a TN 109 shield:
Erroneous "KY" 109 Shield by freebrickproductions, on Flickr

Someone at TNDoT needs to avail themselves of those free counseling services, perhaps?



Opinions expressed here on belong solely to the poster and do not represent or reflect the opinions or beliefs of AARoads, its creators and/or associates.