AARoads Forum

National Boards => General Highway Talk => Topic started by: HandsomeRob on August 28, 2013, 11:25:35 PM

Title: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: HandsomeRob on August 28, 2013, 11:25:35 PM
I drove down I-794 today, and noticed that every single yard of it is elevated. 794 is three and a half miles long - are there any longer interstates that never touch the ground?
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: NE2 on August 28, 2013, 11:29:11 PM
Damn. I-910 touches the ground at the former toll plaza.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: TheStranger on August 29, 2013, 01:18:00 AM
California's Interstate 380 MAY be entirely elevated...but not sure about the 1/2 mile immediately east of 280.  The old, now demolished Interstate 480 almost counted, but for its terminus at Broadway.

Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: NE2 on August 29, 2013, 01:21:17 AM
Quote from: TheStranger on August 29, 2013, 01:18:00 AM
The old, now demolished Interstate 480 almost counted, but for its terminus at Broadway.
Which wasn't part of I-480, since the freeway was going to continue along the waterfront.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: TheStranger on August 29, 2013, 11:10:33 AM
Quote from: NE2 on August 29, 2013, 01:21:17 AM
Quote from: TheStranger on August 29, 2013, 01:18:00 AM
The old, now demolished Interstate 480 almost counted, but for its terminus at Broadway.
Which wasn't part of I-480, since the freeway was going to continue along the waterfront.

Wasn't there a period where the 480 extension to 101 had already been canceled, but it was still an interstate?  Something like 1967-1968.

In that case, would Broadway have been the terminus for I-480?

(The official California definition of Route 480 doesn't help as it always included the unbuilt segment to the Presidio)
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: Henry on August 29, 2013, 01:47:10 PM
I'm sure the twin spurs off I-275 in Tampa (I-175 and I-375) count.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: NE2 on August 29, 2013, 01:58:06 PM
Quote from: Henry on August 29, 2013, 01:47:10 PM
I'm sure the twin spurs off I-275 in Tampa (I-175 and I-375) count.
I'm sure you're not sure.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: bassoon1986 on August 29, 2013, 02:35:49 PM
Unsigned I-345 In Dallas, TX, but it's only 1.8 miles
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: HandsomeRob on August 29, 2013, 02:50:19 PM
Quote from: Henry on August 29, 2013, 01:47:10 PM
I'm sure the twin spurs off I-275 in Tampa (I-175 and I-375) count.

Both of those spend a significant portion of their length on the ground.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: roadman on August 29, 2013, 03:17:38 PM
How about Interstates that, if actually constructed, would have been entirely elevated?  My nomination - the cancelled I-695 "Inner Belt" in Boston.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: agentsteel53 on August 29, 2013, 03:19:48 PM
Quote from: roadman on August 29, 2013, 03:17:38 PM
How about Interstates that, if actually constructed, would have been entirely elevated?  My nomination - the cancelled I-695 "Inner Belt" in Boston.

that moon interstate that keeps floating around would have to be at least mostly elevated.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: NE2 on August 29, 2013, 03:25:57 PM
Quote from: roadman on August 29, 2013, 03:17:38 PM
How about Interstates that, if actually constructed, would have been entirely elevated?  My nomination - the cancelled I-695 "Inner Belt" in Boston.
At least some of the plans would have had depressed portions: http://www.bostonroads.com/roads/inner-belt/
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: ChoralScholar on August 29, 2013, 10:58:18 PM
I-440 east of Little Rock is elevated for a significant portion, but I'm sure it's not all of it.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: froggie on August 30, 2013, 01:04:54 AM
QuoteI-440 east of Little Rock is elevated for a significant portion, but I'm sure it's not all of it.

Correct...not all of it.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: Henry on August 30, 2013, 11:23:58 AM
Quote from: HandsomeRob on August 29, 2013, 02:50:19 PM
Quote from: Henry on August 29, 2013, 01:47:10 PM
I'm sure the twin spurs off I-275 in Tampa (I-175 and I-375) count.

Both of those spend a significant portion of their length on the ground.
I take it back, then.

I just remembered I-395 leading into downtown Baltimore, which is elevated until you touch down near the Camden Yards baseball stadium.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: Thing 342 on August 30, 2013, 12:33:24 PM
DC's I-695 is entirely elevated except for a few portions near the 11th Street Bridge.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: mgk920 on August 31, 2013, 02:01:09 PM
There is a tiny piece of I-794 that touches the ground inside of the Marquette interchange, but I don't know if anyone would count that against it.

I-165 in AL is completely elevated, too.

Mike
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: lamsalfl on August 31, 2013, 03:44:28 PM
Future I-49 from Raceland to the old toll plaza will be approaching 50 miles.

I-310 (mm4?) to I-10 west to I-55 north around mm23 is about 37 miles of continuously elevated interstate.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: triplemultiplex on August 31, 2013, 11:48:17 PM
I-794 used to be all elevated prior to the Marquette Interchange rebuild.  Now there's a short segment in direct contact with the earth.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: froggie on September 01, 2013, 01:06:15 PM
QuoteI-165 in AL is completely elevated, too.

For most intents, yes, but it does touch down before its southern end.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: formulanone on September 01, 2013, 07:28:18 PM
Pretty sure I-395 is entirely elevated. I-195 has a longer elevated portion, but it seems to hit ground level between the two Intracoastal Waterway spans, and at its eastern terminus with Alton Road.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: Alps on September 02, 2013, 11:53:09 AM
"To I-90", Illinois :D
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on September 02, 2013, 11:58:35 AM
Which is technically I-90 :sombrero:
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: SteveG1988 on September 03, 2013, 07:19:05 PM
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffiles.myopera.com%2Fjdlien%2Fblog%2Fskyway.jpg&hash=1089f767b07f8d344f6787a1939e1ee553eb7a83)
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: kphoger on September 03, 2013, 10:17:52 PM
Quote from: roadman on August 29, 2013, 03:17:38 PM
How about Interstates that, if actually constructed, would have been entirely elevated?  My nomination - the cancelled I-695 "Inner Belt" in Boston.

Quote from: agentsteel53 on August 29, 2013, 03:19:48 PM
that moon interstate that keeps floating around would have to be at least mostly elevated.

Quote from: NE2 on August 29, 2013, 03:25:57 PM
At least some of the plans would have had depressed portions.

      :eyebrow:         :happy:




Quote from: Thing 342 on August 30, 2013, 12:33:24 PM
DC's I-695 is entirely elevated except for a few portions near the 11th Street Bridge.

Ooh!  Let's drag this thread out to twelve pages with Interstates that aren't entirely elevated!  My nomination: I-35.

/me crawls back in his box.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: Alps on September 03, 2013, 11:32:56 PM
Quote from: kphoger on September 03, 2013, 10:17:52 PM
Ooh!  Let's drag this thread out to twelve pages with Interstates that aren't entirely elevated!  My nomination: I-35.

/me crawls back in his box.
Don't forget non-Interstates that are and aren't entirely elevated. Actually, just about every road is elevated... above sea level.

Anyone got any more, or thread over?
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: national highway 1 on September 03, 2013, 11:40:03 PM
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fm.friendfeed-media.com%2Fe46f5d92709eca91a5a2acdc57899e7d69d725f5&hash=ac66e5bf75b9d10719efc0dba398f35dfb9d7467)
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: Mr_Northside on September 04, 2013, 01:25:16 AM
Quote from: SteveG1988 on September 03, 2013, 07:19:05 PM
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffiles.myopera.com%2Fjdlien%2Fblog%2Fskyway.jpg&hash=1089f767b07f8d344f6787a1939e1ee553eb7a83)

Man... we're only 2 years away.

Maybe that's why certain projects have been delayed so long. 
I mean, sure, the I-95/PA-TPK ramps project could have been done years ago, but just wait it out until 2015 when we're driving our Mr. Fusion powered flying cars. 
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: hbelkins on September 04, 2013, 11:15:43 AM
Quote from: Steve on September 03, 2013, 11:32:56 PM
Don't forget non-Interstates that are and aren't entirely elevated.

Those exist only in Alanland.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: architect77 on September 04, 2013, 10:09:04 PM
Much of I-10 or I-20 through Louisiana is elevated as it is above a swamp.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: froggie on September 05, 2013, 04:01:13 AM
Not I-20, which runs largely through the hills.  And there are only really 4 main stretches of I-10 that are elevated:  about 20 miles through the Atchafalaya Swamp east of Lafayette, about 12 miles between LaPlace and Kenner, the infamous "Claiborne Expressway" in New Orleans, and the "Twin Spans" over Lake Pontchartrain...a little over 5 miles.
Title: Re: Interstates that are entirely elevated
Post by: Mark68 on September 05, 2013, 04:11:57 AM
Isn't I-80 Business in Sacramento elevated for almost its entire length?