AARoads Forum

National Boards => General Highway Talk => Traffic Control => Topic started by: Zeffy on January 15, 2014, 03:11:41 PM

Title: 'CITY' banner used on-top of US shields?
Post by: Zeffy on January 15, 2014, 03:11:41 PM
I was browsing the page at http://www.routemarkers.com/usa/ when the following shield caught my eye:

(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.routemarkers.com%2Fusa%2FWisconsin%2FCity_US_14.jpg&hash=18b59ab12b97de06b84287588666753d8f204bcb)

I haven't seen a 'CITY' banner ever, with no mentions made in recent MUTCDs. I'm guessing this is an older practice, but does anyone know what exactly the banner is there for? Seems kinda dumb to mark a highway inside of a city as a 'CITY Route'... I mean it's practically implied if the route goes through a city.
Title: Re: 'CITY' banner used on-top of US shields?
Post by: Big John on January 15, 2014, 03:17:19 PM
The "business" sign is used for that now.
Title: Re: 'CITY' banner used on-top of US shields?
Post by: US71 on January 15, 2014, 05:07:04 PM
Bentonville, AR did on "City 71" in the early 1980's (pre 71 Expressway/I-540)
Title: Re: 'CITY' banner used on-top of US shields?
Post by: The High Plains Traveler on January 15, 2014, 09:41:18 PM
Minnesota used THRU CITY, though the route so marked was different from the route bypassing the town. Example was MN-197 through Bemidji along old U.S. 2-71, or county routes through Little Falls where it is bypassed by U.S. 10.
Title: Re: 'CITY' banner used on-top of US shields?
Post by: Alps on January 15, 2014, 10:41:40 PM
Boston had designated city routes - C1, C9, C28 - but the actual routes existed elsewhere at the same time. Heck, C1 multiplexed with US 1.
Title: Re: 'CITY' banner used on-top of US shields?
Post by: Stratuscaster on January 17, 2014, 08:40:53 PM
Illinois had a few CITY routes, too...

US-12
IL-13
US-20
US-30
US-40
US-66