I heard that on I-95 in port saint lucy, florida. there is a new exit 120 on the build. does anybody know what is the road's name?
Couldn't find it on any maps or satellite images. Could be SW Juliet Ave.
The only thing I could find on this project can be found here (http://www.keithandschnars.com/PortStLucie/I-95Crossing.htm). There are apparently two studies, one for Crosstown Parkway and I-95 and one for Becker Road and I-95. There is a lot to read about these projects on their website. If you know if they have actually started construction, let us know, we'd like to hear about it!!
I was visiting South Florida in October and took the SR 869 for the first time in years. I noticed they posted "old" and "new" exit numbers then. Didn't pay much attention to it at the time, but noticed all my 2008 Florida/Broward Co maps had the old numbers. I decided to drive it and sent an email to the Public Relations lady at the Turnpike to confirm. The new exit numbers are shown on this .pdf, with the exception of the Florida's Turnpike exit listed as 21A (South) and 21B (North):
http://www.floridasturnpike.com/maps/UpdatedMaps2008/sawgrass_expressway.pdf (http://www.floridasturnpike.com/maps/UpdatedMaps2008/sawgrass_expressway.pdf)
i think its Crosstown Parkway because when i was driving home from Port Saint Lucie last Sunday, i saw exit 120 sign with cross and then covered by a black thingy. so crosstown parkway may be it.
Ah, so the guide signs were covered in "body bags". Sounds like that the interchange will be opening soon. Have they done anything with the Becker Road interchange further south?
I didn't see too much of the Becker construction. but, i do know that the Crosstown thing is gonna open very soon. because just before Turnpike's Bee Line Hwy exit opened like 2 years ago, a body bag covered the exit only sign.
Quote from: voyager on January 24, 2009, 11:48:06 PM
Honestly I've never understood exit numbers. They always vary so much from state to state.
Well they are either mile-based or sequential-based, please elaborate on what you cannot understand. :spin:
except for the Mass Pike which is kinda sequential for varying definitions of sequential
Well at least California decided that their second attempt at giving exit numbers will eventually include every stretch of freeway in the state, not just the Interstates.
The one good thing about California's exit numbering is that they will be replacing almost every freeway sign, and therefore, those old, faded button copies that have been overdue for replacement for years will finally be retired.
Quote from: John on January 25, 2009, 10:07:06 AM
The one good thing about California's exit numbering is that they will be replacing almost every freeway sign, and therefore, those old, faded button copies that have been overdue for replacement for years will finally be retired.
Well, they don't have the funding to replace all those "old, faded button copies", so a lot of them should remain in place even after the exit numbers are added. And even in replacing signs, CalTrans can't seem to grab the concept of actually using exit tabs, instead just inserting the exit number onto the existing guide sign.
And why is it necessary to replace all these old signs if they are still legible to the driver? It seems to be a growing trend in this country for the government to get rid of everything that is different (like the old button copied signs) and make it uniform with the rest.
On top of that, to save on funds, Caltrans has often just retrofitted the old button copy signs to include exit numbers. A number of signs in Orange County feature the reflective green exit number placards on top of the non-reflective bases.
There's really not much else to say about the Sawgrass Expressway exit renumbering. ;-)
Seriously, the only other things about the Sawgrass I can say is that 2005's Hurricane Wilma KO'd over half the signs, and the number "869" was stolen from Lee County (thanks to flaroadgeek for that tidbit!)
this morning, I was taking a ride with my dad. while, on palmetto park rd (SR-798), i passed by something new. in the junction of oriole country road/SR-798, I saw a sign that read "Judge Winikoff road". i guess oriole country changed its name??? u may please look it up, tell me what u find out.
Yes, as per MY SUGGESTION (My Dad-Barry), (through the West Boca Chamber of Commerce) the County Commission changed the name of the road.
I had originally suggested Jeff Winikoff Blvd. but since he was a judge and they wanted to keep the road word, they changed it to Judge Winikoff road.
It was changed due to his years of effort as president of the Loggers Run Homeowners Association in preventing the dump, forestalling the bridge (University Drive extension from Broward to Palm Beach Cos), etc. etc. etc. Good friend of mine. went to his funeral. 40 judges marching in with robes. Closed down Jog road and made a parking lot out of 4 of the 6 lanes. every politico in PB county there. If you dropped a bomb on the place, would have wiped out politics in the county!
oh, i see.
thank u.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/sfl-flb5950222sbfeb22,0,4075837.story (http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/sfl-flb5950222sbfeb22,0,4075837.story)
==
Huge project to expand Interstate 595 in Broward County to begin this summer
More lanes, safer ramps, new jobs: Construction will begin this summer on massive project to accommodate traffic growth
By Michael Turnbell | South Florida Sun-Sentinel
February 22, 2009
Are you ready for a $1.79 billion jolt?
The most expensive road project in Florida history will shake up Interstate 595 beginning this summer, creating thousands of construction jobs and pumping up to $1 million a day into the economy.
The downside is that drivers will have to endure five years of barricades, alternate routes and lane closures.
Maybe they'll forget such headaches in 2014, when a new and improved I-595 debuts with reversible express lanes for long-distance commuters, new entrance and exit ramps, and a safer, less confusing Florida's Turnpike interchange.
The historic project will be built by a Spanish construction conglomerate teaming up with local contractors, equipment and workers in Florida's first public-private road deal.
By using the private company's financing up front, state officials hope to finish the project in one-third the time it would otherwise take. Had the state built the project the way construction is usually funded, it would have required more than a dozen separate contracts and taken 15 to 20 years to complete.State officials plan to sign a contract with ACS Infrastructure Development by the end of this week.
A much-needed expansion
When I-595 opened in 1989, the 13-mile road cost more than $1.2 billion. At the time, it was the most expensive road project ever undertaken in Florida.
But the highway reached its capacity of 120,000 vehicles a day in the early '90s as southwest Broward County Click here for restaurant inspection reports grew much faster than planners forecast, especially after Hurricane Andrew fueled an exodus of Miami-Dade County residents into Broward. Traffic mushroomed from 60,000 vehicles a day in September 1990 to more than 125,000 seven months later.
Today, the busiest stretch of I-595 carries more than 180,000 vehicles a day.
By 2030, as many as 300,000 are expected.
Planners say easing congestion on I-595 will take more than adding lanes. They also aim to address the problems that cause traffic backups and hazards that lead to accidents today – such as replacing entrance and exit ramps that are too close to each other with "braided" ramps so exiting traffic can rise over entrance ramps.
Preparations to begin in spring
Once the contract is signed, ACS Infrastructure Development must begin construction in 150 days. That means drivers should see signs of road work by late July or August.
Some jobs, however, such as relocating utilities and building noise walls, will begin this spring.
Specific construction plans, such as what will be built first, will be announced in the coming months.
In early talks with the contractor, officials said it appears work will focus first on the outside lanes of I-595. After workers finish rebuilding those lanes, they should shift traffic to the new lanes while the inside lanes are constructed.
The entire road won't be rebuilt. In its bid proposal, the contractor curtailed costs by incorporating some existing bridges, such as the University Drive flyovers, into the new design.
Paying for a faster commute will be option
Traffic on the reversible express lanes will flow eastbound in the morning and westbound in the evening between Interstate 75 and State Road 7.
But unlike the new express lanes on I-95 in Miami that are separated from regular traffic by a row of plastic poles, I-595's express lanes will be divided by concrete barriers.
Drivers will use SunPass to pay tolls that will increase when demand is highest at rush hour.
The concept, called "congestion pricing," relies on simple economics: The higher the price, the more likely some drivers are likely to use the regular travel lanes or drive at a less congested time of day.
The state will control the toll rates and retain the toll revenue, which will be used to help pay for some of the improvements.
Financial incentive to finish project
In a public-private partnership, a private company designs, builds, maintains and operates a road over a period of years and pays part or all of the costs up front, then is repaid later. In I-595's case, ACS Infrastructure Development will finance, design and build the project over five years, then maintain the road from 2014 until 2044.
ACS won't get a dime from the state until after construction is finished. The sooner the project is built, the sooner the team can start receiving payments.
The team is to receive a total of $685 million in "final acceptance" payments spread over seven years plus "availability payments" of $63.98 million a year for 30 years. The amount of the availability payments will depend on how well the contractor maintains I-595 and keeps lanes open to traffic.
A big boost for local economy
The project is expected to have a huge impact on the South Florida economy.
In Florida, every $1 billion spent on nonresidential construction will create at least 23,000 jobs, add $2.3 billion to the state's gross domestic product and contribute about $748 million to personal earnings, according to Ken Simonson, chief economist for the Association of General Contractors.
That includes 7,800 new construction workers, 3,700 new suppliers and 11,000 new jobs throughout the broader economy.
Construction headquarters for the project team will be an office with 30,000 square feet in Davie, with as many as 200 full-time workers.
Now that construction is about to begin on I-595, wouldn't it be a great time to consider renumbering that freeway/tollway to I-75, followed by renumbering the rest of I-75 south of I-595 an extension of State Road 869? One wonders what FDOT was thinking when it decided to route I-75 in Miami/Ft Lauderdale the way they did, especially considering that there's no possible way to route I-75 down Gratigny Pkwy to I-95 without paying megabillions to buy up property in that area.
Quote from: brad2971 on March 08, 2009, 03:29:36 PM
Now that construction is about to begin on I-595, wouldn't it be a great time to consider renumbering that freeway/tollway to I-75, followed by renumbering the rest of I-75 south of I-595 an extension of State Road 869? One wonders what FDOT was thinking when it decided to route I-75 in Miami/Ft Lauderdale the way they did, especially considering that there's no possible way to route I-75 down Gratigny Pkwy to I-95 without paying megabillions to buy up property in that area.
I concur with that except for the short section of I-595 east of I-95. I-75 should end at I-95. However, I was thinking of FL 924 or an I-x75 taking over the current I-75 instead of FL 869, but FL 869 still works for me.
Quote from: brad2971 on March 08, 2009, 03:29:36 PM
Now that construction is about to begin on I-595, wouldn't it be a great time to consider renumbering that freeway/tollway to I-75, followed by renumbering the rest of I-75 south of I-595 an extension of State Road 869? One wonders what FDOT was thinking when it decided to route I-75 in Miami/Ft Lauderdale the way they did, especially considering that there's no possible way to route I-75 down Gratigny Pkwy to I-95 without paying megabillions to buy up property in that area.
I believe the possible reason for Interstate 75 ending at Florida 826 instead of, say, Interstate 95 might have to do with how many miles the interstate was given when originally planned. The second iteration of the Interstate 75 route through southwest Florida over to the east coast had it running along the U.S. 41 corridor, then over to the Florida 836 (Dolphin Expressway) corridor to Interstate 95 (this proposal was in the early 1970's). This proposal (when adding the mileage) roughly equals 108 miles. If you add the current Interstate 75 mileage from Naples to its current end it also adds up to roughly 108 miles. And if AASHTO or the Federal Highway Administration did not allow Florida any additional miles for Insterstate 75, then there was no choice but to end the interstate where it currently ends.
That is my theory anyway. I would like to find any concrete evidence to support this theory, or if anyone can shed any light on this...
Quote from: flaroadgeek on March 08, 2009, 11:44:21 PM
Quote from: brad2971 on March 08, 2009, 03:29:36 PM
Now that construction is about to begin on I-595, wouldn't it be a great time to consider renumbering that freeway/tollway to I-75, followed by renumbering the rest of I-75 south of I-595 an extension of State Road 869? One wonders what FDOT was thinking when it decided to route I-75 in Miami/Ft Lauderdale the way they did, especially considering that there's no possible way to route I-75 down Gratigny Pkwy to I-95 without paying megabillions to buy up property in that area.
I believe the possible reason for Interstate 75 ending at Florida 826 instead of, say, Interstate 95 might have to do with how many miles the interstate was given when originally planned. The second iteration of the Interstate 75 route through southwest Florida over to the east coast had it running along the U.S. 41 corridor, then over to the Florida 836 (Dolphin Expressway) corridor to Interstate 95 (this proposal was in the early 1970's). This proposal (when adding the mileage) roughly equals 108 miles. If you add the current Interstate 75 mileage from Naples to its current end it also adds up to roughly 108 miles. And if AASHTO or the Federal Highway Administration did not allow Florida any additional miles for Insterstate 75, then there was no choice but to end the interstate where it currently ends.
That is my theory anyway. I would like to find any concrete evidence to support this theory, or if anyone can shed any light on this...
However if I-75 was put on I-595 to end at I-95 then there would be approximately seven less miles on I-75 than there is on its current route(its only about twelve miles on I-595 from I-75 to I-95
It has to be the Crosstown Parkway, hands down. We visited family down California Blvd last month and the almost-finished Crosstown did extend to I-95.
I was just down there this past week, interchange looked ready to go but I couldn't see if the road on top connected to anything due to the trees. Looks like a nice regular diamond interchange - would have gotten pictures but it came upon me rather suddenly!
http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2009/mar/26/i-95-interchange-crosstown-parkway-opens-saturday/ (http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2009/mar/26/i-95-interchange-crosstown-parkway-opens-saturday/) I-95 interchange at Crosstown Pkwy now open.
This story (http://www.miamiherald.com/486/story/1064339.html) was posted on the FLRoads Yahoo Roads Group, so I thought I would share it here:
Stimulus money to complete Palmetto Expressway makeover
The last segment of the years-long reconstruction of the Palmetto Expressway, the rebuilding of the massive interchange at the junction of the Palmetto and Dolphin Expressways -- will begin in just months.
-----
When the Palmetto Expressway was built almost 50 years ago, some saw it as a highway to nowhere because it sliced through farm fields in sparsely populated western Dade County.
But as Miami-Dade County grew, so did congestion on the Palmetto -- to the point where some beleaguered commuters began calling it the Crawl-metto.
To ease congestion, state transportation officials slowly began widening the roadway. Now the 12th and last reconstruction segment is scheduled to begin -- thanks to President Barack Obama's $787 billion federal stimulus program for roads, bridges and transit.
By August, the Florida Department of Transportation expects to select the private company or group of companies that will rebuild the massive interchange at the junction of the Palmetto and Dolphin Expressways -- one of South Florida's busiest with more than 430,000 vehicles a day using its confusing ramps and flyovers.
Construction is expected to begin late this year or early next year and will last about six years. Once complete, the project will mark the end of the decades-long reconstruction of a 17-mile portion of the 24-mile roadway -- from its southernmost end at U.S. 1 in Kendall to north of Northwest 158th Street in Miami Lakes.
Transportation officials said the new interchange will ease congestion at one of the most heavily traveled highway junctions in South Florida. One of the reasons traffic backs up at the interchange is because it was never properly designed. It grew piece by piece as ramps and flyovers became necessary to accommodate growing traffic.
''When you look at how the interchange is now configured, it has operational deficiencies,'' said Alice Bravo, FDOT's director of transportation development in Miami.
``There are left-hand entrances and exits, which should be on the right. If you go from southbound Palmetto to eastbound 836, you come in on the left and need to weave across several lanes to an exit, and if you try to go eastbound on 836 in the morning, the queue stretches back to past the turnpike.''
The $552 million interchange project will be the fourth-most expensive transportation project in South Florida. Only reconstruction of Interstate 595 in Broward County at $1.8 billion, construction of the Miami Intermodal Center transit hub at $1.7 billion and the proposed Port of Miami tunnel at $1 billion are more costly.
Widening and reconstruction stems from an FDOT study in the late 1980s that concluded the road needed to be widened -- and in some places rebuilt.
But it wasn't until 1994 that reconstruction started when workers began adding one lane in each direction, new ramps and a drainage system on the northern stretch of the road from Northwest 122nd to 158th streets.
DRIVEN BY MONEY
The state transportation agency divided the project into 12 segments, mainly because it didn't have the money to do the whole project all at once. As money became available, segments were done.
Obama's stimulus program for transportation made possible completion of the last and most ambitious of the segments: the 826-836 interchange.
The Miami district six office of the state transportation agency was assigned about $126 million in stimulus money for projects.
While the Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization, a transportation planning board, voted in February to recommend that the money be assigned to another highway project, a portion of a truck viaduct near Miami International Airport, the transportation agency decided to spend the bulk of the money on the interchange.
Gus Pego, the state transportation agency chief in Miami, said the planning board's recommendation was considered, but which project the stimulus money would be spent on was a discretionary decision by the agency.
In the end, state officials, in coordination with lawmakers in Tallahassee, chose the interchange project over the viaduct since the interchange would put the greatest number of people to work. Broward's pick was construction of a flyover at Dixie Highway in Deerfield Beach.
The cost of the new interchange will be covered by $87.5 million in stimulus money, $200 million from the Miami-Dade Expressway Authority -- which operates 836 -- and $264.5 million from FDOT, Bravo said.
''It's fully funded thanks to stimulus funds,'' Bravo said. ``It made it possible.''
Bravo added that another reason the interchange was picked was because her agency had already spent about $180 million in right-of-way purchases and relocation of homes and businesses that will be affected by construction.
OTHER PROJECTS
The balance of the $126 million the agency was assigned for road and bridge projects will go to two other projects: reconstruction of the final segment of the 18-mile stretch on U.S. 1 south of Florida City and implementation of all-electronic tolling on the Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike.
While off-peak detours, lane and ramp closures are likely throughout the project, Bravo said the interchange will remain open to traffic.
Though the heart of the project is new ramps and flyovers that will replace the existing configuration, the project includes reconstruction of nearby interchanges of the Palmetto at Flagler Street and 836 at Milam Dairy Road, Bravo said.
Bravo said that once the project is finished, traffic will move more efficiently through the interchange, now congested during peak travel hours in the morning and evening.
If it could be done, route it down 826 to US 1, and the small east-west portion of 826 between the curve and I-95 could become an I-x75.
I could always dream.
South Miami Busway could be converted into express lanes(tolled of course) http://www.tollroadsnews.com/node/4205 (http://www.tollroadsnews.com/node/4205)
The I-95 Express Lanes could make it to the Broward-Palm Beach County Line http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/palm-beach/sfl-interstate-95-express-070909,0,5425852.story (http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/palm-beach/sfl-interstate-95-express-070909,0,5425852.story)
QuoteEven the plastic poles used to separate the express lanes from local traffic were derided as "freaking ugly."
That's just loltastic! The plastic poles really do nothing - people drive over them like a speed bump.
It would be really neat to see how this decision affects the design for the I-95 widening in north Broward. If it's incorporated now as opposed to after, perhaps it can be built "right" without having 11 feet lanes and those useless poles.
I will look at work and see what I can dig up regarding the I-95 widening. In other I-95 news, us folks at FDOT are in the PD&E stage of a new interchange at SR 710 in Palm Beach. I attended a VE workshop on that on Friday, and it was pretty interesting to see what is proposed there.
Finally an interchange for SR 710 on I-95 surprisingly. It's usually the Turnpike that's behind the times.
Bingo! Sounds like with SR 710 hooked up, we'll be welcoming an Exit 75 to I-95 in FL! :clap: :-D
Only a few more to go to make it continuous exit numbers from 1-80ish.
Quote from: florida on July 14, 2009, 12:47:46 AM
Finally an interchange for SR 710 on I-95 surprisingly. It's usually the Turnpike that's behind the times.
Things have changed in recent years. In 2003, the SIS (Strategic Intermodal System) was created by the Fla. legislature, which forced FDOT to develop a system of "intermodal" facilities, which include roadways. SR 710 was designated as an SIS roadway since it connects with the Port of Palm Beach (also an SIS facility). Because of this, FDOT wants to add an interchange on I-95 at SR 710, so that SIS facilities are connected (I-95, SR 710 and the Port).
Of course, this interchange is years away. At the VE study, the most viable interchange option presented, IMHO, was one identical to SR 710 and the Turnpike. Others included flyovers at 710 and a C/D system or braided ramps between 45th Street and Blue Heron. But those easily add $200-300 million to the price tag of the project.
Quote from: thomasvista on July 15, 2009, 05:32:51 PM
Things have changed in recent years. In 2003, the SIS (Strategic Intermodal System) was created by the Fla. legislature, which forced FDOT to develop a system of "intermodal" facilities, which include roadways. SR 710 was designated as an SIS roadway since it connects with the Port of Palm Beach (also an SIS facility). Because of this, FDOT wants to add an interchange on I-95 at SR 710, so that SIS facilities are connected (I-95, SR 710 and the Port).
Of course, this interchange is years away. At the VE study, the most viable interchange option presented, IMHO, was one identical to SR 710 and the Turnpike. Others included flyovers at 710 and a C/D system or braided ramps between 45th Street and Blue Heron. But those easily add $200-300 million to the price tag of the project.
That's true about the port. 45th and Blue Heron aren't the best alternatives. It's also one of the last state routes to have a connection with an interstate, especially in SoFlo.
Quote from: lamsalfl on July 14, 2009, 03:46:24 AM
Bingo! Sounds like with SR 710 hooked up, we'll be welcoming an Exit 75 to I-95 in FL! :clap: :-D
Only a few more to go to make it continuous exit numbers from 1-80ish.
Wow, I always wanted to access Bee Line Highway (SR-710) from I-95. I guess we have luck. :clap:
Quote from: florida on July 15, 2009, 07:03:45 PM
Quote from: thomasvista on July 15, 2009, 05:32:51 PM
That's true about the port. 45th and Blue Heron aren't the best alternatives. It's also one of the last state routes to have a connection with an interstate, especially in SoFlo.
The only other state road that doesn't have a link with I-95 is Lake Worth Road, but that'll never happen.
Thomasvista,
Since you said the interchange will look identical design to the one at the Turnpike, then I guess this means "bye bye trailer park". Right?
Quote from: thomasvista on July 15, 2009, 10:42:32 PM
Quote from: florida on July 15, 2009, 07:03:45 PM
Quote from: thomasvista on July 15, 2009, 05:32:51 PM
That's true about the port. 45th and Blue Heron aren't the best alternatives. It's also one of the last state routes to have a connection with an interstate, especially in SoFlo.
The only other state road that doesn't have a link with I-95 is Lake Worth Road, but that'll never happen.
Odd. How come back in the day they never built a direct interchange to Downtown Lake Worth before all the land around the Interstate was developed?
Quote from: lamsalfl on July 15, 2009, 10:49:13 PM
Quote from: thomasvista on July 15, 2009, 10:42:32 PM
Quote from: florida on July 15, 2009, 07:03:45 PM
Quote from: thomasvista on July 15, 2009, 05:32:51 PM
That's true about the port. 45th and Blue Heron aren't the best alternatives. It's also one of the last state routes to have a connection with an interstate, especially in SoFlo.
The only other state road that doesn't have a link with I-95 is Lake Worth Road, but that'll never happen.
Odd. How come back in the day they never built a direct interchange to Downtown Lake Worth before all the land around the Interstate was developed?
Probably because the City of Lake Worth didn't want one there, since Lake/Lucerne Ave is the main drag through their downtown. I'd have to do some historical research on this.
An interesting tidbit: when I-95 was built through Lake Worth, it ate up the student parking lot at Lake Worth High School. To make up for that, the Palm Beach County School Board actually leases the land underneath the elevated I-95 section from FDOT for student parking.
Quote from: lamsalfl on July 15, 2009, 10:46:42 PM
Thomasvista,
Since you said the interchange will look identical design to the one at the Turnpike, then I guess this means "bye bye trailer park". Right?
No actually, the proposal was a "tight" design that will just go butt up against the trailer park. And keep in mind, no major decision have been made about the interchange. It's still in the preliminary planning stages. It could very well change.
Interesting. I'll have to look at the aerials again. Hey, check your private messages...
The Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike is scheduled to be All Electronic by spring 2011.
Contracts for conversion of Florida Turnpike's busy HEFT to all-electronic/cashless tolling (http://www.tollroadsnews.com/node/4300)
QuoteThe Homestead Extension of Florida's Turnpike is scheduled to be All Electronic by spring 2011.
Sure would be nice if they included an extension of SunPass to accept payment through all those E-Z Pass transponders us northeasterners have in our cars when we are visiting Florida!
Quick question: What's the speed limit on the Overseas Highway (U.S. 1)? I was looking at Modern Marvels on History today. Cool highway, it is.
Be well,
Bryant
I believe it is 55 during the day, but expect to be often caught behind RVs doing 45.
at night, it is 35 (one of the few night speed limits outside of Texas) to protect the Key Deer, which is endangered.
Wow! 35?
Thanks!
Be well,
Bryant
There is only a night speed limit of 35 through the key that the Key Deer are on (Big Pine Key). Otherwise, the day and night speed limits are the same on the Overseas Highway.
^^ Thanks.
Isn't there another nighttime speed limit in Florida? Alligator Alley? Might not be, but I read something about something like that.
Be well,
Bryant
I think it's on US 41 through the Everglades.
There is a nighttime speed limit on SR 29 also.