AARoads Forum

Regional Boards => Great Lakes and Ohio Valley => Topic started by: rawmustard on August 17, 2009, 10:04:10 AM

Title: I-69 project: Can state finish what it started?
Post by: rawmustard on August 17, 2009, 10:04:10 AM
This is a rather interesting analysis in the Indianapolis Star about the budget for the I-69 project from Evansville to Crane with the portion from Crane northward still unfunded). Even though current bids are coming in under estimates, the paper thinks it will still be overbudget throughout the duration (through 2015).

Article can be found here (http://www.indystar.com/article/20090817/LOCAL/908170339/I-69+interstate+extension+project++Can+state+finish+what+it+started?)
Title: Re: I-69 project: Can state finish what it started?
Post by: codyg1985 on August 24, 2009, 07:55:13 AM
What percentage of I-69 between Evansville and Crane are under contract?  I think it will be over-budget if a lot of the work is still yet to be let to contract.

If the rest of the road is to be funded with traditional funds, then how long would it take to build it to Bloomington? Or to Indianapolis?
Title: Re: I-69 project: Can state finish what it started?
Post by: leifvanderwall on October 13, 2009, 04:48:40 PM
The Indiana DOT and the other states may want to make I-69 a toll road. Seriously! It's going to be harder and harder to get funding for new roads much less the roads we already have. It's the same thing that's going on with the I-73/ I-74 debacle.
Title: Re: I-69 project: Can state finish what it started?
Post by: Brandon on October 13, 2009, 05:02:45 PM
I have a lot of doubts we'll see I-69 ever finished to Texas (and even connect the parts of I-74 and extend I-73).  It might be better just to go with more common sense numbers that fit the grid for these instead of having unfinished, and never to be finished, bits and pieces scattered across the country.
Title: Re: I-69 project: Can state finish what it started?
Post by: leifvanderwall on October 13, 2009, 06:41:11 PM
I agree. I don't think I-69 should be signed in Mississippi