As the title says, how many examples are there where you have an Interstate, US Highway, and a State Route all concurrent with each other? Exceptions are in states (such as Georgia or Florida) where they assign state highways to Interstate / US routes - state routes need to be actual state routes, not designations for Interstates or US Highways.
My example is I-93, US 1, and MA 3.
I-39/US 51/WI 23 north of Portage
I-94/US 12/WI 35 in Hudson
I-135, US-81, K-15 pretty much all the way through Wichita. I drive it nearly every day. K-96 briefly joins the mix too.
A stretch, perhaps, but in Maryland, there is the unsigned I-595, with signed U.S. 50, U.S. 301 and Md. 2 between Parole and the end of I-595 at Rowe Blvd. (Annapolis area).
I-66, US 17, VA 55.
I-64, US 60, & VA 168 used to be one.
MN's only currently signed one is I-94/US 59/MN 210 (also includes unsigned US 52) in Fergus Falls.
Unsigned/partially unsigned:
I-94/MN 95/(US 12)
I-94/(MN 55)/(US 12)/(US 52)
Former:
I-494/MN 5/US 169 (169 rerouted onto Shakopee bypass late 1990s)
I-35/MN 23/US 61 (61 was decommissioned through this portion in 1991) (?)
In addition to 135/81/15/96:
I-70, U.S. 40, K-18 in the Junction City area. I-70, U.S. 40 and K-4 from the west side of Topeka to just before I-70 joins the Kansas Turnpike.
I-135, U.S. 81 and K-4 briefly in Saline County. I guess that makes K-4 the only K-route that is part of more than one of the concurrencies.
No K-routes have a concurrency with I-35 that I can think of. I-635 has a concurrency with K-5 for a short while, which I think makes it the only Kansas Interstate that's concurrent with a K-route but not a U.S. route at the same time.
Quote from: apeman33 on March 26, 2015, 11:10:04 PM
In addition to 135/81/15/96:
I-70, U.S. 40, K-18 in the Junction City area. I-70, U.S. 40 and K-4 from the west side of Topeka to just before I-70 joins the Kansas Turnpike.
I-135, U.S. 81 and K-4 briefly in Saline County. I guess that makes K-4 the only K-route that is part of more than one of the concurrencies.
No K-routes have a concurrency with I-35 that I can think of. I-635 has a concurrency with K-5 for a short while, which I think makes it the only Kansas Interstate that's concurrent with a K-route but not a U.S. route at the same time.
I-35, US-50, K-31. And a wrong-way concurrency to boot.
Quote from: kphoger on March 26, 2015, 11:27:02 PM
Quote from: apeman33 on March 26, 2015, 11:10:04 PM
In addition to 135/81/15/96:
I-70, U.S. 40, K-18 in the Junction City area. I-70, U.S. 40 and K-4 from the west side of Topeka to just before I-70 joins the Kansas Turnpike.
I-135, U.S. 81 and K-4 briefly in Saline County. I guess that makes K-4 the only K-route that is part of more than one of the concurrencies.
No K-routes have a concurrency with I-35 that I can think of. I-635 has a concurrency with K-5 for a short while, which I think makes it the only Kansas Interstate that's concurrent with a K-route but not a U.S. route at the same time.
I-35, US-50, K-31. And a wrong-way concurrency to boot.
On another day, I probably would have remembered. I've been on it several times.
When I last drove on it northbound, on February 13, I thought to myself: Hmm, I should mention this on some aaroads forum. And then I didn't. And now I did.
I-80/US-30/WYO 789
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.corcohighways.org%2Fhighways%2Fwy%2F789%2F80to80%2F1.jpg&hash=571a4a38d9259db476c242f53a57f04be7f65847)
I-84/US-30/ID-55
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.corcohighways.org%2Fhighways%2Fid%2F84%2F84busnampato69%2F2a.jpg&hash=0cfb3e6bd21459d8fbd6c049f883f424d92a6190)
I-15/US-89/MT-200
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.corcohighways.org%2Fhighways%2Fmt%2F15%2F89to15greatfalls%2F2.jpg&hash=8ad2cd55bed154988b1173c7bed009298174133c)
I-90/US-12/MT-200
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.corcohighways.org%2Fhighways%2Fmt%2F90%2F90missoulato200%2F2.jpg&hash=e699c1bc1d797a37ce5f8f890f4f21a136b1a2cf)
Wyoming feels like cheating because they have so many useless overlaps.
I-40, US 180, AZ 99: http://goo.gl/maps/AkOPf
Honorable mention for I-40, US 95, and AZ 95 in Needles, CA. True in spirit but not in fact.
Where does AZ-95 North exit I-40 West in Needles? Is it before US-95 North enters I-40?
J Street. The yellow line in Google Maps is the signed route, for as much signage is there is.
Another Massachusetts example: I-95/US 3/MA 128 (US 3 is "wrong way")
Further up I-39/US-51 has US-10 and WIS-66 aligned with it in Stevens Point (US-10 rerouted onto new 4-lane while WIS-66 takes its former route through town on the way to Wis Rapids along former CTH-P
Whenever I-41 comes into play, it will spawn new concurrencies with WIS-167 in Germantown and WIS 100 in Menomonee Falls plus a couple more. The US route in question is obvious, though US-45 is in play for some as well.
Virginia also has I-264, US 460 ALT, and VA 337 together across the Berkley Bridge, but only I-264 is currently posted on the interstate itself...
North Carolina has I-40 Bus, US 421, NC 150; also I-140, US 17, NC 140
In the future NC will have I-285, US 52, NC 8
NC used to have I-85, US 29-52-70, NC 150 and I-40, US 64-70 Bus-401, NC 50
South Carolina has I-585, US 176, SC 9
Mapmikey
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394I-94/(MN 55)/(US 12)/(US 52)
Officially, MN 55 does not follow I-94. There's a gap in MN 55.
If you count proposed interstate designations, there's a multiplex of US 6 and NY 17/Future I-86 in New York.
Quote from: 1 on March 27, 2015, 05:17:09 AM
Another Massachusetts example: I-95/US 3/MA 128 (US 3 is "wrong way")
Don't forget I-95/US 1/MA 128 a tad further south, with 1 being a wrong way part of it.
Quote from: dfwmapper on March 27, 2015, 01:19:00 AM
J Street. The yellow line in Google Maps is the signed route, for as much signage is there is.
So, technically US-95, AZ-95, and I-40 do all run together in Needles, between US-95 exit and J Street.
I am pretty sure not signed though, and CalTrans is probably saying that AZ-95 is disconnected between AZ border, and bridge in Needles that takes AZ-95 back to AZ again.
Quote from: Mapmikey on March 27, 2015, 06:24:40 AM
Virginia also has I-264, US 460 ALT, and VA 337 together across the Berkley Bridge, but only I-264 is currently posted on the interstate itself...
North Carolina has I-40 Bus, US 421, NC 150; also I-140, US 17, NC 140
In the future NC will have I-285, US 52, NC 8
NC used to have I-85, US 29-52-70, NC 150 and I-40, US 64-70 Bus-401, NC 50
South Carolina has I-585, US 176, SC 9
Mapmikey
Is not I-85, where you are saying that I-85, US-29-52-70 and NC-150 used run concurrent now Business I-85?
Quote from: froggie on March 27, 2015, 08:12:59 AM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394I-94/(MN 55)/(US 12)/(US 52)
Officially, MN 55 does not follow I-94. There's a gap in MN 55.
I wonder if any money changed hands because of this post.
Quote from: akotchi on March 26, 2015, 10:31:08 PM
A stretch, perhaps, but in Maryland, there is the unsigned I-595, with signed U.S. 50, U.S. 301 and Md. 2 between Parole and the end of I-595 at Rowe Blvd. (Annapolis area).
I do not think Md. 2 is signed even once in that stretch on a reassurance assembly.
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.millenniumhwy.net%2F2008_NOLA_Day_2%2FImages%2F176.jpg&hash=98c675556c56186e7d35bce00220a5b988039ac3)
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.millenniumhwy.net%2F2008_NOLA_Day_2%2FImages%2F199.jpg&hash=0951ca4365eb523497069f8e39207cd89dd46c43)
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.millenniumhwy.net%2F2008_NOLA_Day_2%2FImages%2F240.jpg&hash=9742c092411488ef8a3348ca0310f165e2e00c85)
Louisiana has very few state highways concurrent with interstates. In Alexandria, the Pineville Expressway carries US 167 and LA 28 from Pineville over the Red River. Where the expressway meets I-49, one designation follows north and one follows south, but that's probably the closest you get to having all 3 together.
Although it does not happen too often in Georgia, most state numbers and some US numbers are hidden on the Interstates, but I have noticed that Interstate 20, US 278 and GA 12 are all signed on a section of Interstate 20 east of Atlanta.
Texas, thanks to the "useful" extension of SH 130:
- I-10/US 90/SH 130 (MM 581—603)
- I-410/US 281/SH 130 (MM 41—44)
Because of the Avenue of the Saints, Iowa has I-380, US 218 and Iowa 27 between Iowa City and Cedar Rapids and I-35, US 18, and Iowa 27 by Clear Lake.
LATE ADDITION: Also I-380, US 20 and Iowa 27 in the Waterloo area.
Quote from: cpzilliacus on March 27, 2015, 12:56:09 PM
Quote from: akotchi on March 26, 2015, 10:31:08 PM
A stretch, perhaps, but in Maryland, there is the unsigned I-595, with signed U.S. 50, U.S. 301 and Md. 2 between Parole and the end of I-595 at Rowe Blvd. (Annapolis area).
I do not think Md. 2 is signed even once in that stretch on a reassurance assembly.
It is signed at the points entering the freeway at either end, though I won't speak for the quality of that signing, but you might be right about the mainline. I have not been there lately. Perhaps having lived in that area for a time is why I know it exists.
Quote from: froggie on March 27, 2015, 08:12:59 AM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394I-94/(MN 55)/(US 12)/(US 52)
Officially, MN 55 does not follow I-94. There's a gap in MN 55.
When MNDot replaced the signs at the two interchanges between 55 and 94, MN 55 is now signed as joining I-94; either they erred, or they just haven't gotten around to filling the gap in the log yet. So I personally count it.
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the I-465, I-74, US-40, US-36, US-31, SR-37, SR-67 concurrency on the south side of Indy. I know, there are no reassurance signs along the way, but this is clearly not a case where the DOT just assigns state numbers to the Interstates. The state and US highways are clearly signed as turning onto the Interstates. Example:
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi62.tinypic.com%2F2njkn6e.png&hash=6faddf62f498f470b9c8604fba7250ce221a5d7b)
US-52 is also concurrent with all of these except for I-74.
Quote from: xcellntbuy on March 27, 2015, 03:16:45 PM
Although it does not happen too often in Georgia, most state numbers and some US numbers are hidden on the Interstates, but I have noticed that Interstate 20, US 278 and GA 12 are all signed on a section of Interstate 20 east of Atlanta.
Though GA 12 is signed, it's really just the "tag-along" state route designation for US 278, so that probably doesn't really count.
Here's one that does count, though: I-516/US 17/US 80/GA 21 (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.059789,-81.139311,3a,75y,14.74h,79.54t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s_S5WQvFIE3--YxYQgB4J-w!2e0). US 17 and US 80 bring along (not signed here) GA 25 and GA 26 as sidekicks, respectively, but GA 21 is a legitimate standalone route (continuing a whole half mile or so past I-516's south end!).
Happens twice thanks to Oklahoma 3: I-240/US-62/SH-3, I-40/US-270/SH-3. Also happens in Cleveland County: I-44/US-62/SH-37.
In Tulsa: I-444/US-64/US-75/SH-51, I-44/US-412/SH-66.
I-10/US 17/SR 228 and I-95/US 17/SR 228 are Florida's only (poorly) signed ones.
In western South Dakota, SD 34 overlaps with I-90 and US 14 NW of Sturgis, then going SE from Sturgis, SD 79 overlaps the 2 until the east end of Rapid City.
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on March 27, 2015, 07:07:35 PM
Quote from: froggie on March 27, 2015, 08:12:59 AM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394I-94/(MN 55)/(US 12)/(US 52)
Officially, MN 55 does not follow I-94. There's a gap in MN 55.
When MNDot replaced the signs at the two interchanges between 55 and 94, MN 55 is now signed as joining I-94; either they erred, or they just haven't gotten around to filling the gap in the log yet. So I personally count it.
Signage coming off Olson Hwy has existed for a number of years now, yet MnDOT hasn't updated their log to move 55 to 94. I've also noticed that, unless they updated signs over the winter, there is no indicating coming off Hiawatha that 55 goes anywhere. Both suggest to me that, signage at Olson Hwy notwithstanding, they officially consider 55 a gapped route.
I-99/US 220/PA 26 north of State College, and if I-99 ever gets extended north of I-80 and nothing else changes, there will be an I-99/US 220/PA 44 short concurrency.
Quote from: froggie on March 28, 2015, 06:03:40 AM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on March 27, 2015, 07:07:35 PM
Quote from: froggie on March 27, 2015, 08:12:59 AM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394I-94/(MN 55)/(US 12)/(US 52)
Officially, MN 55 does not follow I-94. There's a gap in MN 55.
When MNDot replaced the signs at the two interchanges between 55 and 94, MN 55 is now signed as joining I-94; either they erred, or they just haven't gotten around to filling the gap in the log yet. So I personally count it.
Signage coming off Olson Hwy has existed for a number of years now, yet MnDOT hasn't updated their log to move 55 to 94. I've also noticed that, unless they updated signs over the winter, there is no indicating coming off Hiawatha that 55 goes anywhere. Both suggest to me that, signage at Olson Hwy notwithstanding, they officially consider 55 a gapped route.
The signage at Hiawatha was replaced and updated in the last few months to show WB 55 joining 94. Unfortunately it was after the last GSV update in that area. I'll try to get a picture when I get a chance.
Quote from: Eth on March 27, 2015, 07:42:06 PM
Quote from: xcellntbuy on March 27, 2015, 03:16:45 PM
Although it does not happen too often in Georgia, most state numbers and some US numbers are hidden on the Interstates, but I have noticed that Interstate 20, US 278 and GA 12 are all signed on a section of Interstate 20 east of Atlanta.
Though GA 12 is signed, it's really just the "tag-along" state route designation for US 278, so that probably doesn't really count.
Here's one that does count, though: I-516/US 17/US 80/GA 21 (https://www.google.com/maps/@32.059789,-81.139311,3a,75y,14.74h,79.54t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s_S5WQvFIE3--YxYQgB4J-w!2e0). US 17 and US 80 bring along (not signed here) GA 25 and GA 26 as sidekicks, respectively, but GA 21 is a legitimate standalone route (continuing a whole half mile or so past I-516's south end!).
Here's a section where GA 25 is signed, but US 17 is not along for the party yet (heading southbound).
I-516/US 80/GA 21/GA 25 (https://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ll=32.086156,-81.129055&spn=0.012544,0.022724&t=m&z=16&layer=c&cbll=32.086073,-81.129102&panoid=n0Qta4ar2s7CdLyGi7IAAA&cbp=12,248.8,,1,1.95)
And yes, both GA 25 and GA 21 are legitimate stand-alone routes (Admittedly, GA 25 is mostly concurrent with US 17, but it does have a stretch where it is independent).
Also, according to Wikipedia, the hidden state route for I-516 is GA 421.
GA 26 is pretty much unsigned in Savannah, but there is a signed (and very short) GA 26 CONN. GA 26 CONN (https://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ll=32.097045,-81.14326&spn=0.025231,0.045447&t=m&z=15&layer=c&cbll=32.097264,-81.143371&panoid=rA0EYtWYuuaxY1v1XA24ww&cbp=12,357.47,,0,-13.41) and GA 26 CONN (https://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ll=32.098427,-81.143475&spn=0.02523,0.045447&t=m&z=15&layer=c&cbll=32.098518,-81.143468&panoid=kssqAbB4zr8G3_93PhoVSQ&cbp=12,42.3,,0,10.13)
On a side note, the hidden route for I-16 is 404. Curiously, there is a GA 404 SPUR on some overhead signs, but it is an unsigned route. GA 404 SPUR (https://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ll=32.074657,-81.105159&spn=0.001577,0.00284&t=m&z=19&layer=c&cbll=32.074606,-81.105136&panoid=FR6r2irZByCq-4dqPFkRBA&cbp=12,335.84,,0,-14.87)
OH 37 / US 36 / Future I-73
Quote from: tcorlandoinsavannah on March 28, 2015, 07:14:08 PM
Curiously, there is a GA 404 SPUR on some overhead signs, but it is an unsigned route.
What does this even mean?
Quote from: NE2 on March 28, 2015, 08:15:23 PM
Quote from: tcorlandoinsavannah on March 28, 2015, 07:14:08 PM
Curiously, there is a GA 404 SPUR on some overhead signs, but it is an unsigned route.
What does this even mean?
I just think it's interesting, that's all.
Quote from: tcorlandoinsavannah on March 28, 2015, 08:22:29 PM
Quote from: NE2 on March 28, 2015, 08:15:23 PM
Quote from: tcorlandoinsavannah on March 28, 2015, 07:14:08 PM
Curiously, there is a GA 404 SPUR on some overhead signs, but it is an unsigned route.
What does this even mean?
I just think it's interesting, that's all.
I don't get what you're saying. It's on signs but it's unsigned?
At least three cases in Illinois:
* I-55/I-64/, US 40, and IL 3 through East St. Louis - though there is a seemingly dying plan to build a new alignment for IL 3 parallel to the interstates that would eliminate this one.
* I-255, US 50, and IL 3 in Columbia and Dupo
* I-72, US 36, and IL 110
Quote from: vtk on March 28, 2015, 08:08:40 PM
OH 37 / US 36 / Future I-73
Shouldn't this be in Fictional Highways? :bigass:
In Maine there are two:
I-395/US-202/ME-15 just outside Bangor
I-295/US-1/ME-26 in Portland
Quote from: NE2 on March 28, 2015, 09:06:24 PM
Quote from: tcorlandoinsavannah on March 28, 2015, 08:22:29 PM
Quote from: NE2 on March 28, 2015, 08:15:23 PM
Quote from: tcorlandoinsavannah on March 28, 2015, 07:14:08 PM
Curiously, there is a GA 404 SPUR on some overhead signs, but it is an unsigned route.
What does this even mean?
I just think it's interesting, that's all.
I don't get what you're saying. It's on signs but it's unsigned?
My wife just asked why I was laughing.
I love you, @NE2.
I love your wife, kphoger.
You're not getting her Bud Light.
Quote from: Big John on March 26, 2015, 10:29:40 PM
I-39/US 51/WI 23 north of Portage
I-94/US 12/WI 35 in Hudson
- (Future) I-41/US 41/45/WI 100 and I-41/US 41/45/WI 167 (NW Suburban Milwaukee)
- (Future) I-41/US 41/WI 32 (Green Bay).
Mike
Quote from: hbelkins on March 28, 2015, 09:40:57 PM
Quote from: vtk on March 28, 2015, 08:08:40 PM
OH 37 / US 36 / Future I-73
Shouldn't this be in Fictional Highways? :bigass:
Fictional would be if I said I-73 / US 23 / OH 315.
Quote from: DandyDan on March 28, 2015, 04:21:00 AM
In western South Dakota, SD 34 overlaps with I-90 and US 14 NW of Sturgis, then going SE from Sturgis, SD 79 overlaps the 2 until the east end of Rapid City.
Towards the end of the 79 concurrency, there's also an overlap with 16 Truck.
I-25, US 87, SH 88 through the Denver Tech Center (unsigned, of course) ... unless the state highway portion was relinquished. Someone here I'm sure knows this better than I do and can confirm if this is no longer valid.
I 49 US 71 US62 and AR 16 in Fayetteville
Quote from: theline on March 27, 2015, 07:20:53 PM
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the I-465, I-74, US-40, US-36, US-31, SR-37, SR-67 concurrency on the south side of Indy. I know, there are no reassurance signs along the way, but this is clearly not a case where the DOT just assigns state numbers to the Interstates. The state and US highways are clearly signed as turning onto the Interstates.
You forgot about the one-mile stretch on the southeast side between Washington St. and Brookville Rd. where it's I-465, US-31, US-36, US-40, US-52, US-421, IN-37, and IN-67. Too bad they're not signed in that stretch.
Quote from: jhuntin1 on April 01, 2015, 04:30:43 PM
Quote from: theline on March 27, 2015, 07:20:53 PM
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the I-465, I-74, US-40, US-36, US-31, SR-37, SR-67 concurrency on the south side of Indy. I know, there are no reassurance signs along the way, but this is clearly not a case where the DOT just assigns state numbers to the Interstates. The state and US highways are clearly signed as turning onto the Interstates.
You forgot about the one-mile stretch on the southeast side between Washington St. and Brookville Rd. where it's I-465, US-31, US-36, US-40, US-52, US-421, IN-37, and IN-67. Too bad they're not signed in that stretch.
I stand corrected (or at least clarified). I hadn't included 52 and 421 because I wasn't sure that INDOT signed them at their entrances to the loop. As far as I can tell from GSV, 421 is not signed as turning onto 465 on the SE side, but it clearly is on the NW side. US-52 is signed as turning onto 465 on the SE side.
It would be a hoot to see a pull-through BGS or reassurance markers with all those highways on it. It's a shame none exists. Talk about sine salad!
Maybe someone with more sign designing skill than I could put one together. If I have it right, it would be North I-465, North US-31, East US-36, East US-40, East US-52, North US-421, North IN-37, and North IN-67 for traffic actually driving north in that one mile stretch.
In Texas you can potentially have four categories: Interstate, US, State Highway and Farm-to-Market Road.
More, if you count spur and loop routes separately from the other classes.
Quote from: apeman33 on March 26, 2015, 11:10:04 PM
I-135, U.S. 81 and K-4 briefly in Saline County. I guess that makes K-4 the only K-route that is part of more than one of the concurrencies.
K-5 is briefly concurrent with
both I-435 and I-635 in Kansas City
Quote from: apeman33
I-635 has a concurrency with K-5 for a short while, which I think makes it the only Kansas Interstate that's concurrent with a K-route but not a U.S. route at the same time.
In addition to the 435/K-5 concurrency, I-235 and K-96 are briefly concurrent.
Any county routes concurrent with all 3 higher classifications?
Quote from: tidecat on April 02, 2015, 11:14:58 PM
Any county routes concurrent with all 3 higher classifications?
No. County routes on Interstates are extremely rare (I-40/CR 66 near Barstow, I-295/CR 551 near Deepwater, any others?).
New York has very few examples because US routes tend to remain on their old alignments or, in the case of Western New York, get demoted to state routes. There is only one and it's I-86/US 219/NY 17 east of Salamanca. Region 5 doesn't even acknowledge NY 17's existence. There are only 3 other Interstate-US Route concurrencies I can think of (I-95/US 1, I-95/US 9, and I-99/US 15 (soon to be gone as well)) and one more (I-86/US 6) in the future.
Interstate-NY Route concurrencies, however, are pretty common.
Quote from: cl94 on April 03, 2015, 08:21:37 PM
one more (I-86/US 6) in the future.
Which will overlap NY 17M between exits 123 and 125.
NJ has one, I-78/US-22/NJ-173, its lasts one exit and isn't signed. CR-551 in Deepwater might not even count, most counties don't acknowledge multiplexes, treating them as breaks in the route.
Connecticut used to have one...
www.aaroads.com/shields/show.php?image=CT19610861