AARoads Forum

National Boards => General Highway Talk => Topic started by: Katavia on December 17, 2015, 02:49:17 PM

Title: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: Katavia on December 17, 2015, 02:49:17 PM
George W. Liles Parkway near Concord, NC. <-- Sort of
unnamed freeway near Chicago beginning at Lake-Cook Road
Any more?
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: hotdogPi on December 17, 2015, 02:52:28 PM
I'm not sure what you mean by "random", but part of the Everett Turnpike in New Hampshire is unnumbered, as is the Lowell Connector in Massachusetts.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: jbnati27 on December 17, 2015, 03:57:20 PM
I think the Dayton (OH) Airport Access Road would qualify. It connects I-70 with the airport and has an exit for US40.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on December 17, 2015, 03:58:41 PM
Does the freeway that connects to the airport in Denver have a number?
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: Bruce on December 17, 2015, 05:09:44 PM
Seattle has two unnumbered freeways that are also not maintained by WSDOT:

The Airport Expressway connecting SR 518 to the Sea-Tac Airport is owned and operated by the Port of Seattle.

The West Seattle Freeway (which is officially signed as an extension of the West Seattle Bridge, per a city ordinance passed in 1997 (http://clerk.seattle.gov/~scripts/nph-brs.exe?s1=&s3=29541&s2=&s4=&Sect4=AND&l=20&Sect2=THESON&Sect3=PLURON&Sect5=RESNY&Sect6=HITOFF&d=RESF&p=1&u=%2F~public%2Fresny.htm&r=1&f=G)) is owned and operated by the Seattle Department of Transportation.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: theline on December 17, 2015, 05:58:03 PM
The Sam Jones Expressway in Indianapolis comes to mind. It used to be the route to the airport, but no longer serves that purpose.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: SectorZ on December 17, 2015, 06:29:06 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 17, 2015, 02:52:28 PM
I'm not sure what you mean by "random", but part of the Everett Turnpike in New Hampshire is unnumbered, as is the Lowell Connector in Massachusetts.

Before your time the Spaulding Turnpike in NH was unnumbered as well, with 16 parallel to the east of it before being routed onto it about 25 years ago. I, however, struggle with whether it's a "random" roadway as well.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: Zeffy on December 17, 2015, 06:30:27 PM
Are we talking about no number at all, or freeways that aren't signed with a number?

Because if it's the latter, the Turnpike, Parkway, Atlantic City Expressway, would all count. Also, wouldn't all of the Kentucky Parkways count because they are signed by name and not number?
EDIT: I realize these are definitely not random, but considering the criteria specified by the OP... I would say they all count.

Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on December 17, 2015, 03:58:41 PM
Does the freeway that connects to the airport in Denver have a number?

Isn't that E-470?
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: dgolub on December 17, 2015, 06:47:27 PM
All of the parkways in New York are unnumbered.  (The sort of exception is that the Henry Hudson Parkway has NY 9A routed along it for most of its length, but even it has an unnumbered part.)  Also coming to mind are the JFK Expressway, the Central Scranton Expressway, and the Milford Parkway.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: CtrlAltDel on December 17, 2015, 06:58:31 PM
Quote from: Zeffy on December 17, 2015, 06:30:27 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on December 17, 2015, 03:58:41 PM
Does the freeway that connects to the airport in Denver have a number?

Isn't that E-470?

E-470 is different from Pena Boulevard.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: Brandon on December 17, 2015, 07:31:01 PM
Quote from: Katavia on December 17, 2015, 02:49:17 PM
unnamed freeway near Chicago beginning at Lake-Cook Road
Any more?

That would be a stretch of freeway between Dundee Road (IL-68) and Lake-Cook Road as IL-53 leaves the freeway at Dundee Road.

There's also a stretch of Lake Shore Drive between Hollywood and Foster.  US-41 joins at Foster.

Then there's the small bit of Stony Island Avenue between 95th Street and I-94.

And, if you ask CDOT, the entire Chicago Skyway.  IDOT and FHWA respectfully disagree.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: NE2 on December 17, 2015, 07:35:52 PM
Quote from: Katavia on December 17, 2015, 02:49:17 PM
George W. Liles Parkway near Concord, NC.
How is this a freeway?

a mostly complete list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NE2/unnumbered_freeways
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: jp the roadgeek on December 17, 2015, 07:46:48 PM
Many of the Parkways in the NYC area have reference numbers and are unsigned.  Also CT 695, the Milford Connector (SR 798) and the stub of the Bradley Airport connector (SR 401).   The Puncheon Run connector in Delaware is also unnumbered.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: oscar on December 17, 2015, 08:01:01 PM
Quote from: NE2 on December 17, 2015, 07:35:52 PM
a mostly complete list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NE2/unnumbered_freeways

Add to NE2's list (which already includes an unnumbered freeway in Anchorage AK) part of the Johansen Expressway in Fairbanks. Last I was there in 2012, it was the only freeway in Alaska with exit numbers.

The Clinched Highway Mapping site shows many freeways, including in Canada, without route numbers. You can decide whether they are "random" or not, but it is clear from this discussion that they are thoroughly unexceptional.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: Milepost61 on December 17, 2015, 10:48:14 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on December 17, 2015, 03:58:41 PM
Does the freeway that connects to the airport in Denver have a number?

No, Pena Blvd is not a state highway so it doesn't have a number. It's owned by the City of Denver and plowed by airport crews.
Title: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: Pete from Boston on December 17, 2015, 11:03:48 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 17, 2015, 02:52:28 PM
I'm not sure what you mean by "random", but part of the Everett Turnpike in New Hampshire is unnumbered, as is the Lowell Connector in Massachusetts.

Sorry, those are very specific freeways, not random ones.  Choose much less carefully next time.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: mariethefoxy on December 18, 2015, 02:35:05 AM
Puncheon Run Connector in Dover DE
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: Brandon on December 18, 2015, 07:31:54 AM
Quote from: NE2 on December 17, 2015, 07:35:52 PM
Quote from: Katavia on December 17, 2015, 02:49:17 PM
George W. Liles Parkway near Concord, NC.
How is this a freeway?

a mostly complete list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NE2/unnumbered_freeways

An older list now.  The Elgin-O'Hare Expressway is now IL-390.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: KEVIN_224 on December 18, 2015, 08:29:56 AM
The only thing I can think of here is what I call the Willow Brook Connector in Berlin, CT. It's a bit over a mile long and runs immediately south of the New Britain city line. Technically it's unsigned CT Route 571. It opened in the early 1960s as an original alignment of the old CT Route 72. It has one exit (for CT Route 71). It mostly connects to CT Routes 71A and 372 on its west end and feeds into CT Route 9 on its east end. (It's left Exit 24 from CT Route 9 north.)

https://goo.gl/maps/izLCVjX9Z8w
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: empirestate on December 18, 2015, 08:46:15 AM
Well, it does have a secret number, but Rochester's Inner Horseshoe (née Loop) has always been the archetype of random unnumbered freewayness.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: dfwmapper on December 18, 2015, 02:59:03 PM
Quote from: NE2 on December 17, 2015, 07:35:52 PM
a mostly complete list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NE2/unnumbered_freeways
The freeway within DFW Airport is tolled.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: Ace10 on December 18, 2015, 03:06:35 PM
Not sure if these would fit the definition of 'random', but both (part of) World Drive and Epcot Center Drive in Walt Disney World/Reedy Creek Improvement District are both freeways with no route number known to me.

Florida's Turnpike (SR 91) and the Homestead Extension (SR 821) are neither random nor unnumbered, but their numbers are not signed except sometimes on construction signs.

At first glance, the Veterans Parkway (the stub connecting I-516 to GA 204) and Harry Truman Parkway in Savannah, Georgia are freeways with no known route number.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: bassoon1986 on December 18, 2015, 04:33:00 PM
Lake Pontchartrain Causeway and Causeway Blvd. in Mandeville before it becomes US 190?
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: cpzilliacus on December 18, 2015, 07:47:37 PM
The Dulles Airport Access Road (parallel to, but separate from Va. 267, the Dulles Toll Road) is "secret" Va. 90004.

The part of the Baltimore-Washington Parkway (BWP) that is owned and maintained by the National Park Service has no signed number, though Maryland has assigned it "secret" Md. 295.

Most of the George Washington Memorial Parkway (GWMP) is in Virginia, and is assigned "secret" Va. 90005.

The BWP has full access control, and even though it is a "true" parkway, the interchanges are not freeway-standard in terms of ramp widths and geometries.

Most of the GWMP north of National Airport has full access control, but there at least one place where a left turn across the median (and oncoming traffic) is legal, and there is at least one legal and marked bike and pedestrian crossing.
Title: Re: Random freeways without route numbers
Post by: mgk920 on December 19, 2015, 10:59:44 PM
Campus Dr in Madison, WI is a short un-numbered freeway.

Mike
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: nexus73 on December 20, 2015, 02:24:30 PM
Delta Highway in Eugene OR is a short connector freeway between I-105/SR 126 and SR 569 (Beltline Road). 

Rick
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: NE2 on December 20, 2015, 02:31:38 PM
Quote from: mgk920 on December 19, 2015, 10:59:44 PM
Campus Dr in Madison, WI is a short un-numbered freeway.
One interchange does not a freeway make.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: oscar on December 20, 2015, 02:42:00 PM
Quote from: NE2 on December 20, 2015, 02:31:38 PM
One interchange does not a freeway make.

Agreed. Personally, I'd normally insist on at least three interchanges in a row, with no at-grade intersections in-between.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: hotdogPi on December 20, 2015, 02:43:18 PM
Quote from: oscar on December 20, 2015, 02:42:00 PM
Quote from: NE2 on December 20, 2015, 02:31:38 PM
One interchange does not a freeway make.

Agreed. Personally, I'd require at least three interchanges in a row, with no at-grade intersections in-between.

That disqualifies the Circumferential Highway in Nashua, NH.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: jakeroot on December 20, 2015, 03:21:24 PM
In Vancouver BC, Golden Ears Way (between 192 Street and Lougheed Highway) is a freeway. No route number (it's maintained by Translink, not the MOT). It has signals at either end of the main bridge, but there are plenty of ramps and divided junctions in between.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: NE2 on December 20, 2015, 04:17:40 PM
Quote from: 1 on December 20, 2015, 02:43:18 PM
Quote from: oscar on December 20, 2015, 02:42:00 PM
Agreed. Personally, I'd require at least three interchanges in a row, with no at-grade intersections in-between.
That disqualifies the Circumferential Highway in Nashua, NH.
If it spurs off another freeway I'd say even one more interchange is enough.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: Revive 755 on December 20, 2015, 10:58:49 PM
Quote from: Katavia on December 17, 2015, 02:49:17 PM
unnamed freeway near Chicago beginning at Lake-Cook Road
Any more?

The freeway stretches of Palatine Road in Chicagoland.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: pumpkineater2 on December 21, 2015, 12:11:38 AM
The recently completed (for now) Northern Parkway west of Phoenix.
Plans call for future sections of it to have at-grade intersections though, but for now it counts as a freeway in my book.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: Brandon on December 21, 2015, 06:45:32 AM
Quote from: Revive 755 on December 20, 2015, 10:58:49 PM
Quote from: Katavia on December 17, 2015, 02:49:17 PM
unnamed freeway near Chicago beginning at Lake-Cook Road
Any more?

The freeway stretches of Palatine Road in Chicagoland.

That's not really a freeway so much as two exits at Milwaukee Avenue (US-45/IL-21) and Wolf Road.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: hbelkins on December 21, 2015, 02:42:52 PM
There's a freeway portion of the Tisdale Parkway in Tulsa.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: hotdogPi on December 21, 2015, 02:49:14 PM
Can the segment connecting I-290 to MA 85 be considered a freeway segment (as it definitely would be if it was part of I-290)?

Note: Google Maps is wrong; this segment actually is unnumbered.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: SignGeek101 on December 21, 2015, 03:04:31 PM
I can think of several. None of these have any at-grade intersections, but most do not have exit numbers. I don't know where 'Parkway' fits; meaning is it closer to 'expressway' or 'freeway'?

Lincoln M. Alexander Pkwy, Red Hill Valley Pkwy, Don Valley Pkwy

Gardiner Exwy (no at-grades on this one either; entire length is above grade).

None of these have numbers I think because they are maintained by their respective cities, and not the MTO.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: ski-man on December 24, 2015, 06:04:35 PM
How about the Baltimore-Washington Parkway. I have been on it a few times and never noticed a route number.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: KEVIN_224 on December 24, 2015, 08:35:41 PM
The portion of that not maintained by the National Parks Service is MD Route 295.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: noelbotevera on December 24, 2015, 10:29:19 PM
Airport Connector in Harrisburg. It's a 4 digit SR, but PennDOT signs it on incredibly puny white signs.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: The Nature Boy on December 24, 2015, 10:34:03 PM
The All-American Freeway in Fayetteville, NC qualifies here, no?
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: Zeffy on December 24, 2015, 10:47:10 PM
Quote from: The Nature Boy on December 24, 2015, 10:34:03 PM
The All-American Freeway in Fayetteville, NC qualifies here, no?

I would think that Bryan Blvd in Greensboro, NC counts as well. Unless it has a hidden designation?
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: 1995hoo on December 25, 2015, 10:26:14 AM

Quote from: Zeffy on December 24, 2015, 10:47:10 PM
Quote from: The Nature Boy on December 24, 2015, 10:34:03 PM
The All-American Freeway in Fayetteville, NC qualifies here, no?

I would think that Bryan Blvd in Greensboro, NC counts as well. Unless it has a hidden designation?

I believe it has an unposted secondary route designation.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: 74/171FAN on December 25, 2015, 11:32:32 AM
Quote from: 1995hoo on December 25, 2015, 10:26:14 AM

Quote from: Zeffy on December 24, 2015, 10:47:10 PM
Quote from: The Nature Boy on December 24, 2015, 10:34:03 PM
The All-American Freeway in Fayetteville, NC qualifies here, no?



I would think that Bryan Blvd in Greensboro, NC counts as well. Unless it has a hidden designation?

I believe it has an unposted secondary route designation.

Wade Avenue has an unposted secondary route designation too.  As I posted in the "giving unnumbered freeways numbers" thread, I would prefer NC 54 follow I-40 to it and then follow it past I-440 and be extended east to US 70/NC 50 at Glenwood Ave.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: froggie on December 25, 2015, 01:47:26 PM
All-American Freeway used to "qualify", but it was given the NC 555 designation last year.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: doorknob60 on December 25, 2015, 02:13:47 PM
Quote from: nexus73 on December 20, 2015, 02:24:30 PM
Delta Highway in Eugene OR is a short connector freeway between I-105/SR 126 and SR 569 (Beltline Road). 

Rick

You beat me to it. I'll add to that, Delta Highway is maintained by Lane County (or maybe the city of Eugene, but I think it's the county; Not ODOT). Beltine was originally also county maintained, although according to Wikipedia became a state highway in 1978. OR-569 was not signed until quite recently. I lived in Eugene from around 2003-2006, and it never was signed with a route number then. It is now signed as 569, although I assume locals still call it "The Beltline" or similar.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: mapman1071 on January 03, 2016, 10:45:36 PM
Sky Harbor Blvd
Between I-10 EB Exit 149 Phoenix and Priest Drive/AZ 202 WB Exit 5 Tempe. 
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: thenetwork on January 04, 2016, 12:48:23 AM
Quote from: Milepost61 on December 17, 2015, 10:48:14 PM
Quote from: TheHighwayMan394 on December 17, 2015, 03:58:41 PM
Does the freeway that connects to the airport in Denver have a number?

No, Pena Blvd is not a state highway so it doesn't have a number. It's owned by the City of Denver and plowed by airport crews.

I still say that CDOT and the City of Denver should make it an extension of I-225 since to reach I-225 from Pena or vice-versa, you barely have a chance to take a breath on I-70 before you are exiting off for the other highway.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: cbeach40 on January 04, 2016, 12:47:54 PM
Quote from: SignGeek101 on December 21, 2015, 03:04:31 PM
Lincoln M. Alexander Pkwy, Red Hill Valley Pkwy, Don Valley Pkwy
Gardiner Exwy (no at-grades on this one either; entire length is above grade).

None of these have numbers I think because they are maintained by their respective cities, and not the MTO.

Exactly.

Other Ontario examples include Allen Road (Toronto), Burlington Street (Hamilton), Highbury Avenue (London), EC Row Expressway (Windsor), and the Queen Elizabeth Way (MTO).
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: The Nature Boy on January 04, 2016, 01:21:26 PM
Quote from: 1995hoo on December 25, 2015, 10:26:14 AM

Quote from: Zeffy on December 24, 2015, 10:47:10 PM
Quote from: The Nature Boy on December 24, 2015, 10:34:03 PM
The All-American Freeway in Fayetteville, NC qualifies here, no?

I would think that Bryan Blvd in Greensboro, NC counts as well. Unless it has a hidden designation?

I believe it has an unposted secondary route designation.

Almost every state maintained road in North Carolina has a "secondary route designation" though. If we started counting NC SRs as "numbered highways" then the only non-numbered highways would be roads maintained by private landowners.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: BakoCondors on January 04, 2016, 05:06:39 PM
Westside Parkway, Bakersfield, CA. When the Centennial Corridor project is comeplete, it will become a realigned CA-58 (or possibly I-40?) but for now, it's a 6-mile long local freeway maintained and patrolled by the City of Bakersfield.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: brycecordry on January 04, 2016, 05:26:59 PM
If no one mentions them, the Kentucky Parkway system has unsigned 9000-series numbers, but for all intents and purpose, they are numberless.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: dfwmapper on January 05, 2016, 11:54:30 AM
Quote from: mapman1071 on January 03, 2016, 10:45:36 PM
Sky Harbor Blvd
Between I-10 EB Exit 149 Phoenix and Priest Drive/AZ 202 WB Exit 5 Tempe.
The portion between 202 and the airport boundary west of 143 is in ADOT route logs as Spur 202, although it isn't posted. The rest of it isn't really a freeway.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: Quillz on January 06, 2016, 06:33:00 PM
A short portion of what was once the CA-1 freeway through Oxnard will become a freeway alignment of Oxnard Boulevard once CA-1 is officially rerouted onto Rice Avenue.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: vegas1962 on January 06, 2016, 10:33:43 PM
Sam Cooper Blvd. in Memphis, from I-40/240 to Highland St.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: vtk on January 07, 2016, 12:29:05 PM
In Columbus, we have International Gateway, which has three interchanges and no at-grade crossings between Cassady Ave and ½ mile east of Taxiway H. (Spur freeway off I-670 serving the airport.)
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: mariethefoxy on January 07, 2016, 01:04:50 PM
JFK Expressway in Queens, its maintained by the Port Authority.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: sandwalk on January 07, 2016, 04:30:32 PM
Northwest Parkway in metro Denver is numberless.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: Henry on January 11, 2016, 11:50:13 AM
Billy Graham Parkway and the Josh Birmingham Parkway in Charlotte are unnumbered, although the former was once signed as US 521.

Also, the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel in NYC does not have a number, due to it being secret I-478.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: bing101 on January 14, 2016, 07:23:58 PM
Summerlin RD in Vegas


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pe%C3%B1a_Boulevard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pe%C3%B1a_Boulevard)


Peña Boulevard is really a city owned freeway in Denver.


But in the Philippines all Control Access Highways do not have route numbers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Luzon_Expressway


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manila%E2%80%93Cavite_Expressway


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metro_Manila_Skyway
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muntinlupa%E2%80%93Cavite_Expressway


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAIA_Expressway


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Luzon_Expressway
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Tagalog_Arterial_Road




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subic%E2%80%93Clark%E2%80%93Tarlac_Expressway


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subic%E2%80%93Tipo_Expressway


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarlac%E2%80%93Pangasinan%E2%80%93La_Union_Expressway


Its the rule not the exception.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: hotdogPi on January 14, 2016, 07:33:54 PM
Quote from: bing101 on January 14, 2016, 07:23:58 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-470 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-470)

CA-244 in Sacramento is a unsigned route for the east end of CA-51 @ I-80

Are 244 and 470 not numbers?
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: cl94 on January 14, 2016, 07:44:15 PM
Quote from: Henry on January 11, 2016, 11:50:13 AM
Also, the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel in NYC does not have a number, due to it being secret I-478.

Which means it has a number. Other than the aforementioned JFK Expressway, nothing in New York qualifies because everything has a route number, whether it be assigned by the state or a county (in the case of Suffolk).

In the Great White North, Red Hill Valley Parkway and the Lincoln M. Alexander Parkway in Hamilton, along with the Gardiner, Allen Road, and the Don Valley Parkway in Toronto, are city-maintained and unnumbered.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: Rothman on January 15, 2016, 08:15:16 AM
Quote from: 1 on January 14, 2016, 07:33:54 PM
Quote from: bing101 on January 14, 2016, 07:23:58 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-470 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-470)

CA-244 in Sacramento is a unsigned route for the east end of CA-51 @ I-80

Are 244 and 470 not numbers?

Mr. The Frog, we all agreed:  A celebrity is not a people!
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: roadman65 on January 15, 2016, 08:26:06 AM
The Sam Jones Expressway near Indianapolis has no number and its a freeway, or at least was a few years ago.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: empirestate on January 15, 2016, 09:55:45 AM
Quote from: cl94 on January 14, 2016, 07:44:15 PM
Quote from: Henry on January 11, 2016, 11:50:13 AM
Also, the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel in NYC does not have a number, due to it being secret I-478.

Which means it has a number. Other than the aforementioned JFK Expressway, nothing in New York qualifies because everything has a route number, whether it be assigned by the state or a county (in the case of Suffolk).

Except the JFK Expressway. For some reason, to my knowledge that's never been given a reference route number, even though NYSDOT did eventually assign them to other non-DOT roads such as the first leg of the Berkshire Spur.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: cl94 on January 15, 2016, 10:10:44 AM
Quote from: empirestate on January 15, 2016, 09:55:45 AM
Quote from: cl94 on January 14, 2016, 07:44:15 PM
Quote from: Henry on January 11, 2016, 11:50:13 AM
Also, the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel in NYC does not have a number, due to it being secret I-478.

Which means it has a number. Other than the aforementioned JFK Expressway, nothing in New York qualifies because everything has a route number, whether it be assigned by the state or a county (in the case of Suffolk).

Except the JFK Expressway. For some reason, to my knowledge that's never been given a reference route number, even though NYSDOT did eventually assign them to other non-DOT roads such as the first leg of the Berkshire Spur.

NYSTA is a state authority, though. Port Authority didn't even have to follow state/city building codes until after 9/11, hence why WTC didn't have a sprinkler system.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: theline on January 15, 2016, 05:02:24 PM
Quote from: roadman65 on January 15, 2016, 08:26:06 AM
The Sam Jones Expressway near Indianapolis has no number and its a freeway, or at least was a few years ago.

I couldn't resist the temptation to be a smartass and point out that I beat you to it nearly a month ago: https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=17076.msg2113630#msg2113630 (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=17076.msg2113630#msg2113630)
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: empirestate on January 15, 2016, 06:54:24 PM
Quote from: cl94 on January 15, 2016, 10:10:44 AM
Quote from: empirestate on January 15, 2016, 09:55:45 AM
Quote from: cl94 on January 14, 2016, 07:44:15 PM
Quote from: Henry on January 11, 2016, 11:50:13 AM
Also, the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel in NYC does not have a number, due to it being secret I-478.

Which means it has a number. Other than the aforementioned JFK Expressway, nothing in New York qualifies because everything has a route number, whether it be assigned by the state or a county (in the case of Suffolk).

Except the JFK Expressway. For some reason, to my knowledge that's never been given a reference route number, even though NYSDOT did eventually assign them to other non-DOT roads such as the first leg of the Berkshire Spur.

NYSTA is a state authority, though. Port Authority didn't even have to follow state/city building codes until after 9/11, hence why WTC didn't have a sprinkler system.

Well, the Port Authority is a bi-state authority, but I'm not sure I take your point? NYSDOT numbers various roads maintained by counties and municipalities, and most of the Port Authority's other roadways do have numbers. I'm not seeing the connection between the jurisdictional level of an agency and whether or not its roadways have numbers.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: roadfro on January 17, 2016, 01:14:59 PM
Quote from: bing101 on January 14, 2016, 07:23:58 PM
Summerlin RD in Vegas

That would be Summerlin Parkway.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: bing101 on January 18, 2016, 12:58:03 PM
Quote from: roadfro on January 17, 2016, 01:14:59 PM
Quote from: bing101 on January 14, 2016, 07:23:58 PM
Summerlin RD in Vegas

That would be Summerlin Parkway.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: peterj920 on January 18, 2016, 12:59:36 PM
Sam Cooper Blvd in Memphis.  Was going to be I-40 until construction through Overton Park was blocked by the courts.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: bing101 on January 18, 2016, 01:00:17 PM
Dallas North Tollway have no numbers, FDR Drive in NYC and Storrow Drive in Boston have no numbers designated by their respective states.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: Pete from Boston on January 18, 2016, 03:03:50 PM
Quote from: bing101 on January 18, 2016, 01:00:17 PM
Dallas North Tollway have no numbers, FDR Drive in NYC and Storrow Drive in Boston have no numbers designated by their respective states.

Regarding Storrow Drive, you're right.  But don't believe Google Maps or the locals about it.  East of the "Copley Square" exit, the road carries Mass. Route 28 and turns northeast, but is actually (almost secretly) named Embankment Road.  Depending on who you ask, once you pass the Longfellow Bridge it's actually Charles Street, which carries not only 28 but Mass. 3 as well. 

Edit: After that convoluted explanation, I forgot to include the important point that the proverbial "everyone" calls all of it "Storrow Drive" even though, strictly speaking, those numbered portions are not.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: empirestate on January 18, 2016, 06:22:37 PM

Quote from: bing101 on January 18, 2016, 01:00:17 PM
Dallas North Tollway have no numbers, FDR Drive in NYC and Storrow Drive in Boston have no numbers designated by their respective states.

The FDR certainly does, but you'll have to look it up on my website 'cos I don't remember it offhand. :-)


iPhone
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: noelbotevera on January 18, 2016, 06:36:06 PM
Quote from: empirestate on January 18, 2016, 06:22:37 PM

Quote from: bing101 on January 18, 2016, 01:00:17 PM
Dallas North Tollway have no numbers, FDR Drive in NYC and Storrow Drive in Boston have no numbers designated by their respective states.

The FDR certainly does, but you'll have to look it up on my website 'cos I don't remember it offhand. :-)


iPhone
Pretty much a reference route...unless we count those, then yes, it is otherwise unnumbered.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: cl94 on January 18, 2016, 06:37:10 PM
Quote from: noelbotevera on January 18, 2016, 06:36:06 PM
Quote from: empirestate on January 18, 2016, 06:22:37 PM

Quote from: bing101 on January 18, 2016, 01:00:17 PM
Dallas North Tollway have no numbers, FDR Drive in NYC and Storrow Drive in Boston have no numbers designated by their respective states.

The FDR certainly does, but you'll have to look it up on my website 'cos I don't remember it offhand. :-)


iPhone
Pretty much a reference route...unless we count those, then yes, it is otherwise unnumbered.

We are counting them because it is an official route number. This has already been established.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: Kacie Jane on January 18, 2016, 11:14:54 PM
Established by who?  I just see multiple posts on both sides of the "argument".  The OP didn't specify, and people have been disregarding hidden numbers since page 1.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: empirestate on January 19, 2016, 12:37:39 AM
Quote from: noelbotevera on January 18, 2016, 06:36:06 PM
Quote from: empirestate on January 18, 2016, 06:22:37 PM

Quote from: bing101 on January 18, 2016, 01:00:17 PM
Dallas North Tollway have no numbers, FDR Drive in NYC and Storrow Drive in Boston have no numbers designated by their respective states.

The FDR certainly does, but you'll have to look it up on my website 'cos I don't remember it offhand. :-)


iPhone
Pretty much a reference route...unless we count those, then yes, it is otherwise unnumbered.

Not just pretty much; it's a reference route altogether!
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: cl94 on January 19, 2016, 11:29:33 AM
Quote from: Kacie Jane on January 18, 2016, 11:14:54 PM
Established by who?  I just see multiple posts on both sides of the "argument".  The OP didn't specify, and people have been disregarding hidden numbers since page 1.

The topic says "route numbers". Technically, reference routes are "route numbers", therefore they count. An unsigned route number is still a route number.
Title: Re: Freeways without route numbers
Post by: jakeroot on January 19, 2016, 08:06:21 PM
Quote from: cl94 on January 19, 2016, 11:29:33 AM
Quote from: Kacie Jane on January 18, 2016, 11:14:54 PM
Established by who?  I just see multiple posts on both sides of the "argument".  The OP didn't specify, and people have been disregarding hidden numbers since page 1.

The topic says "route numbers". Technically, reference routes are "route numbers", therefore they count. An unsigned route number is still a route number.

Comes down to a matter of opinion. If you drive along the whole length of a freeway, with only a name to reference to the road, it's basically unsigned; it has no obvious route number.  This "list" should consist of freeways that either have no route number, or are unsigned.