AARoads Forum

National Boards => General Highway Talk => Traffic Control => Topic started by: ixnay on October 03, 2016, 07:14:34 AM

Title: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: ixnay on October 03, 2016, 07:14:34 AM
On the DC thread on the Midatlantic board, cpzilliacus stated that DC has IHO a plethora of unnecessary stop signs.

Where are they and why are they not needed?

ixnay
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: cpzilliacus on October 03, 2016, 08:21:26 AM
Many collector-class roads, and they are not needed because they are being used as traffic calming devices, and were installed because of demands made by local activists, not because they were  warranted.
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: jeffandnicole on October 03, 2016, 08:35:33 AM
Ironically, this thread is unwarranted because the question could've been asked as a reply on the DC thread on the Mid-Atlantic board.
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: AlexandriaVA on October 03, 2016, 09:18:51 AM
Quote from: cpzilliacus on October 03, 2016, 08:21:26 AM
Many collector-class roads, and they are not needed because they are being used as traffic calming devices, and were installed because of demands made by local activists, not because they were  warranted.

Typical traffic engineering/planning myopia in a nutshell on display right here:

Local residents = "activists"

unwarranted = anything besides maximum throughput

Politicians are responsible to their constituents. There will always be an inherent political element to this kinda stuff.
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: ixnay on October 03, 2016, 09:49:58 PM
Quote from: jeffandnicole on October 03, 2016, 08:35:33 AM
Ironically, this thread is unwarranted because the question could've been asked as a reply on the DC thread on the Mid-Atlantic board.

Since it's specifically about traffic control devices, I thought it rated its own thread rather than be buried in that one.  We'll have to agree to disagree, j&n.

ixnay
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: ixnay on October 03, 2016, 09:53:49 PM
Quote from: cpzilliacus on October 03, 2016, 08:21:26 AM
Many collector-class roads,

Got examples, so we can employ Google Maps (e.g.) (or an ADC atlas of DC) accordingly?

ixnay
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: cpzilliacus on October 03, 2016, 10:07:16 PM
Quote from: ixnay on October 03, 2016, 09:53:49 PM
Quote from: cpzilliacus on October 03, 2016, 08:21:26 AM
Many collector-class roads,

Got examples, so we can employ Google Maps (e.g.) (or an ADC atlas of DC) accordingly?

ixnay

For starters, here (https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9059448,-77.0670699,3a,75y,200.4h,68.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXR1S4jNx7O8eoNM0CENp0w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) is one.
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: cpzilliacus on October 03, 2016, 10:08:12 PM
Quote from: AlexandriaVA on October 03, 2016, 09:18:51 AM
Quote from: cpzilliacus on October 03, 2016, 08:21:26 AM
Many collector-class roads, and they are not needed because they are being used as traffic calming devices, and were installed because of demands made by local activists, not because they were  warranted.

Typical traffic engineering/planning myopia in a nutshell on display right here:

Local residents = "activists"

unwarranted = anything besides maximum throughput

Politicians are responsible to their constituents. There will always be an inherent political element to this kinda stuff.

Ever heard of warrant analysis?  Appears to have been entirely abandoned in the District of Columbia when  it comes to STOP signs. 
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: ixnay on October 04, 2016, 07:18:06 AM
Quote from: cpzilliacus on October 03, 2016, 10:07:16 PM
Quote from: ixnay on October 03, 2016, 09:53:49 PM
Quote from: cpzilliacus on October 03, 2016, 08:21:26 AM
Many collector-class roads,

Got examples, so we can employ Google Maps (e.g.) (or an ADC atlas of DC) accordingly?

ixnay

For starters, here (https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9059448,-77.0670699,3a,75y,200.4h,68.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXR1S4jNx7O8eoNM0CENp0w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656) is one.

Now you're talkin'.

ixnay
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: Brandon on October 04, 2016, 10:52:25 AM
Quote from: jeffandnicole on October 03, 2016, 08:35:33 AM
Ironically, this thread is unwarranted because the question could've been asked as a reply on the DC thread on the Mid-Atlantic board.

It goes way beyond DC.  Unwarranted stop signs are used as speed control devices in a lot of places, including Chicago.
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: PHLBOS on October 04, 2016, 11:27:27 AM
Quote from: Brandon on October 04, 2016, 10:52:25 AM
Quote from: jeffandnicole on October 03, 2016, 08:35:33 AM
Ironically, this thread is unwarranted because the question could've been asked as a reply on the DC thread on the Mid-Atlantic board.

It goes way beyond DC.  Unwarranted stop signs are used as speed control devices in a lot of places, including Chicago.
Local (non-PennDOT) roads in southeastern PA have done such for decades.
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: roadman on October 04, 2016, 11:52:56 AM
Quote from: Brandon on October 04, 2016, 10:52:25 AM
Quote from: jeffandnicole on October 03, 2016, 08:35:33 AM
Ironically, this thread is unwarranted because the question could've been asked as a reply on the DC thread on the Mid-Atlantic board.

It goes way beyond DC.  Unwarranted stop signs are used as speed control devices in a lot of places, including Chicago.
In 1987, the Massachusetts Legislature, through an act known as Chapter 689, gave local cities and towns the right to install stop signs on local streets and roads without first obtaining MassDPW approval.  In my neighborhood alone, it was amazing how many very low volume intersections that never had a safety or a speed problem suddenly were considered dangerous enough for the City of Lynn to immediately install stop signs upon passage of the act.
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: jeffandnicole on October 04, 2016, 11:56:41 AM
Quote from: Brandon on October 04, 2016, 10:52:25 AM
Quote from: jeffandnicole on October 03, 2016, 08:35:33 AM
Ironically, this thread is unwarranted because the question could've been asked as a reply on the DC thread on the Mid-Atlantic board.

It goes way beyond DC.  Unwarranted stop signs are used as speed control devices in a lot of places, including Chicago.

Yep...and we've talked about them quite often too.

They've cropped up a little bit in NJ, when rules were relaxed regarding the criteria needed for such signs. Previously, NJDOT had to approve the locations, even on municipal roads.  They took that requirement away. Fortunately, there hasn't been toooo many unwarranted signs going up, even though just a few are, of course, too many.
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: cpzilliacus on October 15, 2016, 02:00:18 PM
Another example in D.C. can be found here (https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9025066,-76.9927934,3a,75y,94.91h,71.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s6u14xWCJFPbrU9jz1SNOlA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1).
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: Bruce on October 16, 2016, 12:45:09 AM
We need more stop signs. Everywhere.

In the other Washington, we have a plethora of unmarked crosswalks where drivers don't stop, despite it being the law (https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/walk/Laws.htm). Forcing them to stop every time would help train drivers to actually stop instead of speeding up around pedestrians.
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: Rothman on October 16, 2016, 02:51:14 PM
Quote from: Bruce on October 16, 2016, 12:45:09 AM
We need more stop signs. Everywhere.


(https://media.tenor.co/images/4933cfed1378426fd90fc00b4dc8ba7f/raw)
Title: Re: Unwarranted stop signs in the District of Columbia
Post by: vdeane on October 16, 2016, 05:47:27 PM
Quote from: Bruce on October 16, 2016, 12:45:09 AM
We need more stop signs. Everywhere.

In the other Washington, we have a plethora of unmarked crosswalks where drivers don't stop, despite it being the law (https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/walk/Laws.htm). Forcing them to stop every time would help train drivers to actually stop instead of speeding up around pedestrians.
Or it would just train them that stop signs don't mean anything and aren't worth obeying.  You know, kinda what already happened to speed limits and is happening to stop signs because residents want to use them for speed control.

The real solution is better drivers ed and MUCH more difficult written and road tests, and making it RETROACTIVE, required for anyone who got a licence earlier the next time they renew.  Don't make life harder for drivers just because we let people drive who are flat out unqualified to operate a motor vehicle.