Anyone else feel like wide (series E or F) text that is horizontally compressed to series C or D width looks really crisp and sharp? I think it looks better than the actual series C or D in some cases depending on the application
No. I've never liked it. There's a reason why there are multiple available widths.
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Faaroads.com%2Fshields%2Fimg%2FRI%2FRI19882952i1.jpg&hash=076bf556fa0888e16db31df294f48ef054591beb)
Quote from: Quillz on July 23, 2018, 12:15:29 PM
No. I've never liked it. There's a reason why there are multiple available widths.
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Faaroads.com%2Fshields%2Fimg%2FRI%2FRI19882952i1.jpg&hash=076bf556fa0888e16db31df294f48ef054591beb)
I agree. Looks weird, especially the terminals and spaces.
Quote from: AMLNet49 on July 23, 2018, 12:11:56 PM
Anyone else feel like wide (series E or F) text that is horizontally compressed to series C or D width looks really crisp and sharp? I think it looks better than the actual series C or D in some cases depending on the application
Found the OkDOT employee...
Quote from: Scott5114 on July 24, 2018, 09:02:18 PM
Quote from: AMLNet49 on July 23, 2018, 12:11:56 PM
Anyone else feel like wide (series E or F) text that is horizontally compressed to series C or D width looks really crisp and sharp? I think it looks better than the actual series C or D in some cases depending on the application
Found the OkDOT employee...
Thank you. Coffee and LCD screens are not a good combination. :coffee: :rofl: