AARoads Forum

User Content => Photos, Videos, and More => Topic started by: theroadwayone on September 03, 2018, 09:40:23 PM

Title: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: theroadwayone on September 03, 2018, 09:40:23 PM
What are some interesting or unusual design features you see on roads in other states that you wish you could get on the network in your own but know for one reason or another won't happen?
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: Max Rockatansky on September 03, 2018, 09:49:13 PM
75-80 MPH speed limits in California.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: hotdogPi on September 03, 2018, 09:52:04 PM
1. 80 mph speed limits
2. Texas-style frontage roads
3. VMSes that actually display useful things
4. Two-way yield instead of stop signs (as in Europe)
5. Left on red from two-way to one-way
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: theroadwayone on September 03, 2018, 09:55:38 PM
By the way, feel free to move this if necessary. I only noticed where I put it after I hit "post."
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on September 03, 2018, 11:14:47 PM
Cutout shields
(actual) Historical US Routes
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on September 04, 2018, 12:45:44 AM
Actual functional high-speed freeway-to-freeway interchanges
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: paulthemapguy on September 04, 2018, 09:39:19 AM
HOV lanes.

A freeway grid in the Chicago metro where the spacing between freeways is less than 7 miles.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: jakeroot on September 04, 2018, 10:44:51 AM
I don't think there's anything that WSDOT won't do (they're quite clever). I've spent quite a while pondering what I'd like to see in Washington State, but I'm quite happy with things. Very liberal turn-on-red laws, decent speed limits in urban areas (always 60), quite a few high-speed flyover ramps (with more coming in time), HOV and toll lanes, etc.

As for what I'd like to see:

- More APL signs (WSDOT just doesn't sign option lanes anymore).
- Better designed on-ramps (currently using CA style, but I'd prefer add-lane + merge like BC).
- Better, more thorough road markings (like edge-extension markings or cross-hatching in flush medians).
- More secondary traffic lights on poles or masts (more popping up every day but still not enough).
- More flashing yellow arrows (way too many single-lane protected lefts on state highways (local agencies use a lot of FYAs now))
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: Brandon on September 04, 2018, 03:38:19 PM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on September 04, 2018, 09:39:19 AM
HOV lanes.

A freeway grid in the Chicago metro where the spacing between freeways is less than 7 miles.

Add to that:

Michigan Lefts
Four-level stack interchanges
IDOT freeways wider than six-lanes (three per direction) outside of Chicago, Kingery Expy, and I-290 near Schaumburg.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: TheStranger on September 04, 2018, 05:14:03 PM
Chicago-style road name signage on freeway pullthroughs (though those have legibility issues)
Consistent signage on surface roads (and a focus on navigation, not "who maintains this road", for signed routes to begin with)
Routes without extensive gaps

Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: GaryV on September 04, 2018, 05:17:29 PM
Michigan: 

- Tunnel under the mountains
- Good roads throughout the state, unfortunately
- A trip to the UP without construction between April and October
- And hopefully, toll roads!
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: US 89 on September 04, 2018, 07:46:22 PM
Utah:
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: formulanone on September 04, 2018, 09:14:23 PM
Alabama:

Guardrail.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: slorydn1 on September 06, 2018, 04:32:30 AM
NC:

80 MPH speed limits
Streetlights on the freeways and expressways would be nice, too.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: cjk374 on September 06, 2018, 07:51:02 AM
Louisiana:

Speed limits higher than 55 on the 2-lane roads that can handle it.

6-lane interstates in rural areas.

Guide/distance signs big enough to read.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: paulthemapguy on September 06, 2018, 09:46:47 AM
Quote from: formulanone on September 04, 2018, 09:14:23 PM
Alabama:

Guardrail.

If Alabama really doesn't have guardrail, then this trumps most anything anyone else is complaining about!  LOL!
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: formulanone on September 06, 2018, 12:17:21 PM
Quote from: paulthemapguy on September 06, 2018, 09:46:47 AM
Quote from: formulanone on September 04, 2018, 09:14:23 PM
Alabama:

Guardrail.

If Alabama really doesn't have guardrail, then this trumps most anything anyone else is complaining about!  LOL!

It's lacking in a lot places in the northern half of the state, where high meets low in close proximity to the road's edge (ravines, ditches, hills) even along Interstate 65. There's times I'm more afraid to be a passenger than driver!
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: Jardine on September 06, 2018, 12:34:47 PM
Modern, high speed, interstate to interstate interchange at  I-29 and I-680 at Crescent.

:popcorn:
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: jakeroot on September 06, 2018, 11:04:20 PM
Quote from: bing101 on September 06, 2018, 10:24:55 AM
California is least likely to get SPUI interchange.

There's one at the 215/Eucalyptus interchange in Moreno Valley? Or just widespread use?
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: Great Lakes Roads on September 07, 2018, 02:31:58 AM
In Indiana, we probably won't get:
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: TheStranger on September 07, 2018, 03:54:45 AM
Quote from: jakeroot on September 06, 2018, 11:04:20 PM
Quote from: bing101 on September 06, 2018, 10:24:55 AM
California is least likely to get SPUI interchange.

There's one at the 215/Eucalyptus interchange in Moreno Valley? Or just widespread use?

Also can think of at least two along Route 87 in San Jose.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: thenetwork on September 07, 2018, 10:43:53 AM
COLORADO: 

-  Consistently signed multiplexes
-  "Un-hiding" hidden routes on BGSs.  (Hello, US-6 along I-70!)
-  FYA's in the Northwest CO CDOT District, including Grand Junction.

Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: paulthemapguy on September 07, 2018, 12:31:44 PM
Quote from: Jardine on September 06, 2018, 12:34:47 PM
Modern, high speed, interstate to interstate interchange at  I-29 and I-680 at Crescent.

:popcorn:

Wow.  Dude, you're right.  I-680 definitely needs a EB-to-NB flyover
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: FreewayDan on September 08, 2018, 12:12:09 AM
Quote from: TheStranger on September 07, 2018, 03:54:45 AM
Quote from: jakeroot on September 06, 2018, 11:04:20 PM
Quote from: bing101 on September 06, 2018, 10:24:55 AM
California is least likely to get SPUI interchange.

There's one at the 215/Eucalyptus interchange in Moreno Valley? Or just widespread use?

Also can think of at least two along Route 87 in San Jose.

Add two more on the 241 toll road in Orange County: Alton and Portola Parkways
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: SSR_317 on September 09, 2018, 04:30:30 PM
Quote from: Great Lakes Roads on September 07, 2018, 02:31:58 AM
In Indiana, we probably won't get:

  • express lanes on congested corridors (I-70, I-465, I-69, and I-80/94)
  • interchanges that are more than 3 levels
  • stack interchanges
  • freeway management system
We have the latter here in Indy, thought you up in NW Indiana did too, at least on a couple of routes (Borman ?).
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: pdx-wanderer on September 09, 2018, 09:29:32 PM
Non neutered interstate shields in Oregon, and a somewhat interesting state route shield design.
Eastern Oregon style speed limits throughout the state. (If that can count)
Fewer small towns used as control cities for I-5 and I-84. 
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: Brandon on September 10, 2018, 03:45:04 PM
Quote from: SSR_317 on September 09, 2018, 04:30:30 PM
Quote from: Great Lakes Roads on September 07, 2018, 02:31:58 AM
In Indiana, we probably won't get:

  • express lanes on congested corridors (I-70, I-465, I-69, and I-80/94)
  • interchanges that are more than 3 levels
  • stack interchanges
  • freeway management system
We have the latter here in Indy, thought you up in NW Indiana did too, at least on a couple of routes (Borman ?).

Yep, for the Borman, I-65, & Toll Road (https://www.travelmidwest.com/lmiga/map.jsp?mapname=gary) in NW Indiana.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: csw on September 17, 2018, 10:43:20 AM
Forget all that, I just want business routes in Indiana.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: inkyatari on September 18, 2018, 09:01:50 AM
Illinois:

TUNNELS!

Damn, I need to move to Colorado.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: thenetwork on September 18, 2018, 10:19:23 AM
Quote from: inkyatari on September 18, 2018, 09:01:50 AM
Illinois:

TUNNELS!

Damn, I need to move to Colorado.

Or Pittsburgh.
Title: Re: Road Features You Won't Get in Your State
Post by: CNGL-Leudimin on October 08, 2018, 04:38:58 AM
null:

Error, please specify a state.