AARoads Forum

National Boards => General Highway Talk => Topic started by: andrewkbrown on February 21, 2010, 07:43:58 PM

Title: Smallest town
Post by: andrewkbrown on February 21, 2010, 07:43:58 PM
What is the smallest town where an Interstate cuts through the middle of it, as opposed to bypassing it?

I've thought about this during my many trips through both Zanesville, Ohio and Cumberland, Maryland; small towns that to me, seem unusual to have an interstate cut through it with multiple interchanges. I assume there may be even smaller towns like these.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: Alex on February 21, 2010, 07:45:03 PM
Wallace, Idaho comes to mind. Interstate 90 travels along a viaduct hugging a mountainside just outside of downtown.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: roadfro on February 21, 2010, 08:13:56 PM
Any of the towns along I-80 in rural Nevada would be likely candidates...Fernley, Lovelock, Winnemucca, Battle Mountain, Carlin, Wells, Wendover. Most of these have about 3 exits off of I-80 that are somewhat central to the town.

I guess it depends on the definition of the town and cutting through the middle. Most of the towns I mentioned have I-80 just skirting to one side of the developed areas (homes & businesses).

Elko is the only one of these communities that has a good number of homes on both sides of I-80. Although I'd guess that the homes on the north side came after the interstate was built, as there's far more development on the south side where original US 40 (now Idaho St/SR 535) passes through. 
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: 3467 on February 21, 2010, 09:02:39 PM
Not an Interstate but a freeway US 34 slices right past downtown Burlington Iowa and makes a direct connection to the strip development on US 61. Its 30,000 maybe a little smaller than Zanesville
The Bridge and the Bluffs made it possible.
Dubuque sort of but its larger and acess is not 100% controlled
I-74 cits rightthrough downtown Moline and Bettendorf -Small if counted as separate towns. It also runs through downtown Peoria and East Peoria.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: corco on February 21, 2010, 09:08:31 PM
According to WYDOT data, I-80 does indeed clip the incorporation limits of Buford, Wyoming, population 1
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: Riverside Frwy on February 21, 2010, 09:41:43 PM
Corco is right.......

Buford, WY:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Buford,+Wyoming&sll=36.879621,-95.712891&sspn=40.835751,89.824219&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Buford,+Albany,+Wyoming&ll=41.122265,-105.301552&spn=0.018977,0.043859&t=h&z=15

Wow, there is nothing but a post office.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: corco on February 21, 2010, 09:49:14 PM
That post office is also a gas station and former restaurant. Across the way (also within city limits) is a seasonal fireworks stand
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: Bickendan on February 21, 2010, 10:04:10 PM
Manned by the same employee/resident, right?
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: corco on February 21, 2010, 11:06:10 PM
I assume most of the workers commute from Vedauwoo
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: US71 on February 21, 2010, 11:37:38 PM
Quote from: corco on February 21, 2010, 09:08:31 PM
According to WYDOT data, I-80 does indeed clip the incorporation limits of Buford, Wyoming, population 1

1 ? I was there 3 years ago, and I thought it was 2?
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm3.static.flickr.com%2F2234%2F2261497185_f87425d1e9.jpg&hash=2090f817e713e71b6bd77874bbbfb52617852cc4)

Buford is a jumping off point for the wilderness areas to the north: lots of camping, etc. Very rugged, very primitive.

The Buford Trading Post has almost everything you need: gas, deli, groceries... even FAX service.
(https://www.aaroads.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm4.static.flickr.com%2F3446%2F3294381128_256831b98d.jpg&hash=ed3953a9cc09f23e616cccf30086083259149431)
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: mightyace on February 21, 2010, 11:43:39 PM
While nowhere near that small, I-80 does pass through the town limits of Bloomsburg, PA, but that's not a heavily developed part of town.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: mgk920 on February 21, 2010, 11:48:43 PM
There are OODLES of very tiny places, especially in the west, where the necessities of topography dictated that the interstate cut the town in half.  A fairly stark example that immediately comes to my mind is Pompeys Pillar, MT (I-94).

An interesting case here - although not an interstate, plans for the US 54/400 bypass freeway at Greensburg, KS changed when the city of about 1.4K was 95% destroyed by a tornado a few years ago.  While it was originally planned to take a fairly conventional routing around the city to the south, with nearly all of the city no longer there and in the way, their government decided to instead have it routed about halfway between their main street (existing US 54/400) and the railroad three blocks to the north.  The impetus was to have their rebuilt downtown area right next to, visible and easily accessible from the traffic that it will carry.

Mike
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: bugo on February 22, 2010, 02:40:03 AM
Quote from: mgk920 on February 21, 2010, 11:48:43 PM
An interesting case here - although not an interstate, plans for the US 54/400 bypass freeway at Greensburg, KS changed when the city of about 1.4K was 95% destroyed by a tornado a few years ago.  While it was originally planned to take a fairly conventional routing around the city to the south, with nearly all of the city no longer there and in the way, their government decided to instead have it routed about halfway between their main street (existing US 54/400) and the railroad three blocks to the north.  The impetus was to have their rebuilt downtown area right next to, visible and easily accessible from the traffic that it will carry.
And this road will no doubt built with a low speed limit.  The original true bypass would have been better.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: Chris on February 22, 2010, 03:32:44 AM
Quote from: US71 on February 21, 2010, 11:37:38 PM
Quote from: corco on February 21, 2010, 09:08:31 PM
According to WYDOT data, I-80 does indeed clip the incorporation limits of Buford, Wyoming, population 1

1 ? I was there 3 years ago, and I thought it was 2?
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2234/2261497185_f87425d1e9.jpg (http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2234/2261497185_f87425d1e9.jpg)

A population decline of 50% in 3 years? Wyoming now officially belongs to the Rust Belt :D
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: Roadgeek Adam on February 22, 2010, 06:41:49 AM
Interstate 10 - Exit 159 of Plateau TX - Population: 5
Interstate 10 - Exit 166 - Boracho Station TX

Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: corco on February 22, 2010, 08:11:27 AM
It's down to 1 now...once I get back to Wyoming I'll take a picture of the sign. Hard times hit Buford! Actually, the old trading post burnt down a few years ago, and when the new one was rebuilt, the population went from two to one
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: mgk920 on February 22, 2010, 12:10:01 PM
Quote from: bugo on February 22, 2010, 02:40:03 AM
Quote from: mgk920 on February 21, 2010, 11:48:43 PM
An interesting case here - although not an interstate, plans for the US 54/400 bypass freeway at Greensburg, KS changed when the city of about 1.4K was 95% destroyed by a tornado a few years ago.  While it was originally planned to take a fairly conventional routing around the city to the south, with nearly all of the city no longer there and in the way, their government decided to instead have it routed about halfway between their main street (existing US 54/400) and the railroad three blocks to the north.  The impetus was to have their rebuilt downtown area right next to, visible and easily accessible from the traffic that it will carry.
And this road will no doubt built with a low speed limit.  The original true bypass would have been better.

I doubt that, as it will be built as a full, interstate-compatible freeway.

See: http://www.ksdot.org/Greensburg.asp for the latest KDOT info on this project.

Mike
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: Bickendan on February 22, 2010, 01:37:00 PM
Quote from: Chris on February 22, 2010, 03:32:44 AM
Quote from: US71 on February 21, 2010, 11:37:38 PM
Quote from: corco on February 21, 2010, 09:08:31 PM
According to WYDOT data, I-80 does indeed clip the incorporation limits of Buford, Wyoming, population 1

1 ? I was there 3 years ago, and I thought it was 2?
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2234/2261497185_f87425d1e9.jpg (http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2234/2261497185_f87425d1e9.jpg)

A population decline of 50% in 3 years? Wyoming now officially belongs to the Rust Belt :D
Well, there's my nomination for QOTW. One of my old Geography professors would be amused by that, too.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on February 22, 2010, 05:52:56 PM
Quote from: corco on February 22, 2010, 08:11:27 AM
It's down to 1 now...once I get back to Wyoming I'll take a picture of the sign. Hard times hit Buford! Actually, the old trading post burnt down a few years ago, and when the new one was rebuilt, the population went from two to one

I'm surprised that Andy Field hasn't chimed in on the subject of Buford.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: agentsteel53 on February 22, 2010, 10:01:14 PM
Quote from: osu-lsu on February 22, 2010, 05:52:56 PM


I'm surprised that Andy Field hasn't chimed in on the subject of Buford.

Andy Field had better get himself alive!  :-D
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: agentsteel53 on February 22, 2010, 10:03:07 PM
in any case...

(//www.aaroads.com/shields/blog/photos/031621.jpg)

I need to find my photo of Johnsondale, CA (population 1 1/2) - but this is a sufficiently interesting lower bound.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: xonhulu on February 22, 2010, 10:05:54 PM
Now as soon as they build that Fairbanks-to-Nome interstate, Buford has some competition...
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: mapman on February 23, 2010, 02:16:38 AM
Quote from: agentsteel53 on February 22, 2010, 10:03:07 PM
I need to find my photo of Johnsondale, CA (population 1 1/2) - but this is a sufficiently interesting lower bound.

How'd they count a half-person?  Is it some sort of half-human, half-animal thing?   :confused:
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: Bickendan on February 23, 2010, 04:48:29 AM
Nah, probably a 'Nam vet. :meh:
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: agentsteel53 on February 23, 2010, 09:48:40 AM
Quote from: mapman on February 23, 2010, 02:16:38 AM
How'd they count a half-person?  Is it some sort of half-human, half-animal thing?   :confused:

one full-time forest ranger, one seasonal.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: florida on February 23, 2010, 01:42:04 PM
I-10, Exit 217 in Florida (SR 59) gives access for Lloyd, FL which has a population of 34 (in 2000). Next biggest contender would be Exit 104 for Caryville, population 232.
Title: Re: Smallest town
Post by: Alex on February 23, 2010, 07:45:30 PM
So to go back to the original question, are we talking about just passing through the limits of an incorporated town or city, or through the actual "downtown" or central business district or whatever you want to refer to as the hub, of a city?