AARoads Forum

National Boards => General Highway Talk => Topic started by: Duke87 on March 10, 2010, 07:22:34 PM

Title: INRIX's "National Traffic Scorecard"
Post by: Duke87 on March 10, 2010, 07:22:34 PM
Results are out for 2009.

The top 100 bottlenecks in the US (http://www.inrix.com/scorecard/Top100Bottlenecks.asp)
and the top 100 congested metro areas in the US (http://www.inrix.com/scorecard/Top100Metros.asp)

Four of the top ten bottlenecks are on the Cross Bronx :colorful:
Title: Re: INRIX's "National Traffic Scorecard"
Post by: Scott5114 on March 10, 2010, 07:31:24 PM
The worst 100 bottlenecks occur in only 8 states. Hmmm...
Title: Re: INRIX's "National Traffic Scorecard"
Post by: Alps on March 10, 2010, 07:36:53 PM
The Cross Bronx should be one bottleneck.
Title: Re: INRIX's "National Traffic Scorecard"
Post by: rickmastfan67 on March 10, 2010, 07:37:32 PM
Quote52 55 Pittsburgh (22) Santa Monica Fwy/I-10 EB US-19/BANKSVILLE RD/EXIT 5 Allegheny PA 0.73 45 11.9

Hmm, so they are saying there is a wormhole right here in my back yard pretty much that would allow me to go directly to CA in 2 seconds? :sombrero:
Title: Re: INRIX's "National Traffic Scorecard"
Post by: froggie on March 10, 2010, 09:37:50 PM
QuoteThe worst 100 bottlenecks occur in only 8 states. Hmmm...

Take note of how all but 9 of them occur in only 3 states:  California, Illinois, and New York.

I find it a bit surprising that the same study which puts D.C. at #4 for worst congestion, says that DC lacks any of the "top 100 bottlenecks".
Title: Re: INRIX's "National Traffic Scorecard"
Post by: Brandon on March 11, 2010, 11:05:48 AM
I took note of how they did it by interchange/milepost.  Those Dan Ryan bottlenecks are just one large bottleneck from Ohio Street on the Kennedy to I-55 on the Ryan.  Part of the problem here, northbound on the Ryan, is that the connector from the Ryan to Wacker Drive was never built.  That would've removed enough cars and trucks bound for the Loop from the overburdened Circle Interchange.
Title: Re: INRIX's "National Traffic Scorecard"
Post by: Chris on March 11, 2010, 12:00:02 PM
Quote from: froggie on March 10, 2010, 09:37:50 PM
Take note of how all but 9 of them occur in only 3 states:  California, Illinois, and New York.

Which happen to have the largest metropolitan areas of the United States. Usually the most notable exceptions are further down the list, when a 900,000 metropolitan area has worse congestion than a 2.5 million metropolitan area. (Baton Rouge vs Detroit comes to mind).
Title: Re: INRIX's "National Traffic Scorecard"
Post by: J N Winkler on March 11, 2010, 12:48:44 PM
Wichita has its worst traffic congestion at 9 PM on Monday.  Hmmm . . . .
Title: Re: INRIX's "National Traffic Scorecard"
Post by: cpzilliacus on May 14, 2013, 03:51:59 PM
Inrix has done a lot of fixing-up of their Web site that has their "scorecard" information on it, which is why I am reviving this old thread. 

Members of this board may wish to take a look (disclaimer:  I do not work for Inrix, but I do use their data).

Scorecard: http://scorecard.inrix.com/scorecard/ (http://scorecard.inrix.com/scorecard/)

Inrix Traffic blog:  http://www.inrix.com/traffic/blog/ (http://www.inrix.com/traffic/blog/)