AARoads Forum

National Boards => General Highway Talk => Traffic Control => Topic started by: Brian556 on May 21, 2020, 02:01:16 PM

Title: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: Brian556 on May 21, 2020, 02:01:16 PM
Just...what the...?

https://www.google.com/maps/@30.4936568,-92.4162942,3a,89.6y,187.15h,87.65t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1solDUT0RjkXbPwfgYeE5kPQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 (https://www.google.com/maps/@30.4936568,-92.4162942,3a,89.6y,187.15h,87.65t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1solDUT0RjkXbPwfgYeE5kPQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656)
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: kphoger on May 21, 2020, 02:13:55 PM
Just in case anyone else was wondering...

Yes, it does also turn green (https://goo.gl/maps/TWJZfLym9gNMLoV17).
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: -- US 175 -- on May 21, 2020, 02:46:29 PM
From what I'm seeing from this GSV, I don't think I've ever seen a street quite like this one.

Meanwhile, as for the topic, is the signal supposed to be for the street, or is it just decoration for that business?
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: Ned Weasel on May 21, 2020, 02:59:03 PM
Quote from: -- US 175 -- on May 21, 2020, 02:46:29 PM
From what I'm seeing from this GSV, I don't think I've ever seen a street quite like this one.

Meanwhile, as for the topic, is the signal supposed to be for the street, or is it just decoration for that business?

I think it's just a decoration for the business, although I would think most jurisdictions would have sign ordinances prohibiting anything that could be confused for a traffic control device.  If it was a two-way street narrowing to one lane with a traffic signal controlling through movement, it would make sense, although this particular installation still wouldn't be MUTCD-compliant.  But there's no corresponding signal on the other side of the roadway narrowing, and I'm pretty sure it's a one-way street.
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: kphoger on May 21, 2020, 03:00:24 PM
Well, the speed limit sign (https://goo.gl/maps/anqzyGAUTFJXmxDr9) certainly deserves dishonorable mention, too.
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: kphoger on May 21, 2020, 03:01:57 PM
Quote from: stridentweasel on May 21, 2020, 02:59:03 PM

Quote from: -- US 175 -- on May 21, 2020, 02:46:29 PM
From what I'm seeing from this GSV, I don't think I've ever seen a street quite like this one.

Meanwhile, as for the topic, is the signal supposed to be for the street, or is it just decoration for that business?

I think it's just a decoration for the business, although I would think most jurisdictions would have sign ordinances prohibiting anything that could be confused for a traffic control device.  If it was a two-way street narrowing to one lane with a traffic signal controlling through movement, it would make sense, although this particular installation still wouldn't be MUTCD-compliant.  But there's no corresponding signal on the other side of the roadway narrowing, and I'm pretty sure it's a one-way street.

Well, I'd say you could always contact the owner and ask.  Unfortunately, after a bit of Google research, it appears the owner passed away on March 9.
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: Brandon on May 21, 2020, 03:36:11 PM
Quote from: kphoger on May 21, 2020, 03:00:24 PM
Well, the speed limit sign (https://goo.gl/maps/anqzyGAUTFJXmxDr9) certainly deserves dishonorable mention, too.

Not quite worst-of, but still terrible all around.
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: TEG24601 on May 21, 2020, 05:24:19 PM
I kind of like the street design, but they could certainly make it more pedestrian friendly.


I was under the impression, that speeds under 25 were not enforceable anyway, so the sign really is just pointless.


The signal is interesting, if a bit confusing.  Maybe it is red when closed, and green when open.

Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: mrsman on May 22, 2020, 06:11:02 PM
There is something to be said for this.  A business district that was thankfully placed on a low traffic street.  A narrow driving ROW to enforce a low speed limit and angled parking to maximize the ability to park nearby.  But I agree that something more could be done to make it more comfortable for walking.
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: jeffandnicole on May 22, 2020, 06:18:49 PM
Quote from: TEG24601 on May 21, 2020, 05:24:19 PM
I was under the impression, that speeds under 25 were not enforceable anyway, so the sign really is just pointless.

Let me guess...you heard that from a friend, a friend of a friend, or read it on the internet?
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: Hot Rod Hootenanny on May 23, 2020, 09:59:24 PM
Quote from: jeffandnicole on May 22, 2020, 06:18:49 PM
Quote from: TEG24601 on May 21, 2020, 05:24:19 PM
I was under the impression, that speeds under 25 were not enforceable anyway, so the sign really is just pointless.

Let me guess...you heard that from a friend, a friend of a friend, or read it on the internet?

Worse yet, in the "general highway" forum on AAroads.
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: Verlanka on May 24, 2020, 05:31:29 AM
Quote from: Hot Rod Hootenanny on May 23, 2020, 09:59:24 PM
Quote from: jeffandnicole on May 22, 2020, 06:18:49 PM
Quote from: TEG24601 on May 21, 2020, 05:24:19 PM
I was under the impression, that speeds under 25 were not enforceable anyway, so the sign really is just pointless.

Let me guess...you heard that from a friend, a friend of a friend, or read it on the internet?

Worse yet, in the "general highway" forum on AAroads.
Source?
Title: Re: Traffic Signal Mounted on Building Mid-Block in Eunice LA
Post by: ErmineNotyours on May 31, 2020, 08:50:55 PM
Related: W 42nd Street, NYC. (https://goo.gl/maps/MF5Ek7TWNtRFih8q6)