AARoads Forum

Regional Boards => Mountain West => Topic started by: Rover_0 on May 13, 2010, 02:46:52 PM

Title: Utah's Five Counties AoG, UT-9, and "Federal Designation"
Post by: Rover_0 on May 13, 2010, 02:46:52 PM
Here's an interesting article from Kanab's Southern Utah News concerning the Five Counties Association of Governments (FCAoG):

(Kane) County airs Concerns with FCAoG (http://www.sunews.net/article.cfm?articleID=539)

On the 3rd and  4th (and a little on the 5th), there is a mention of proposed changes on UT-9, and what several communities from this allegiance of county governments call ZC-3 (which, by my guess, is Zion Corridor, though I'm at a loss as to exactly why the 3 is there), linking communities.  Of interest to me is the term "Federal Designation," in which more than a few people refer to as a "Federal Route," or US Route.

I've emailed the FCAoG and have not received any response (though it's only been a few hours), but would this be a possible US Route, as it's on the NHS System (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/nhs/maps/ut/index.htm), or is the term "Federal Designation" more about a Federally Designated Scenic Route?

I'm aware that the states would need to be involved, but it's odd that they mention "proposed changes on the [UT]-9 Route."  What do you make of this?
Title: Re: Utah's Five Counties AoG, UT-9, and "Federal Designation"
Post by: Revive 755 on May 17, 2010, 04:04:53 PM
Looks more like a national scenic byway designation over a new US route, at least to me.
Title: Re: Utah's Five Counties AoG, UT-9, and "Federal Designation"
Post by: xonhulu on May 17, 2010, 08:15:47 PM
Yeah, I didn't get the impression it was for a US Route.
Title: Re: Utah's Five Counties AoG, UT-9, and "Federal Designation"
Post by: Rover_0 on May 18, 2010, 05:58:59 PM
Yea, one of the Administrators emailed me back, saying that the moniker to UT-9 wouldn't change.