AARoads Forum

National Boards => General Highway Talk => Topic started by: NWI_Irish96 on September 17, 2021, 06:12:43 PM

Title: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 17, 2021, 06:12:43 PM
This is inspired by someone's suggestion that IL 394 be turned into I-394 and I responded that even though part of IL 394 is a freeway, its control city is Danville and people might mistakenly believe that they could take an all-interstate route to Danville by following 394.

This led me to the following question: Is there anyplace in the US where a control city is signed on an interstate but you can't get to that city via interstate by going that direction?

I-65 north doesn't go to Chicago, but you can get to continue to Chicago on interstates, so that doesn't count.

I-69 north at Bloomington has a control city of Indianapolis, but if you head north you have to leave the interstate system to get there.

However, this is only a temporary situation as the rest of I-69 has construction either underway or planned to start soon.

Is there a more permanent example anywhere?
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: hotdogPi on September 17, 2021, 06:14:35 PM
Does Montreal count?
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: ilpt4u on September 17, 2021, 06:37:31 PM
Phoenix on I-515 SB leaving Downtown Las Vegas...at least until US 93 is much further along being upgraded to I-11
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 17, 2021, 06:38:34 PM
Quote from: 1 on September 17, 2021, 06:14:35 PM
Does Montreal count?

I don't know enough about Canada's highway system. If someone follows a sign for Montreal, are they going to stay on interstate-grade roads? That's really the spirit of what I'm getting at.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: hotdogPi on September 17, 2021, 06:40:32 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on September 17, 2021, 06:38:34 PM
Quote from: 1 on September 17, 2021, 06:14:35 PM
Does Montreal count?

I don't know enough about Canada's highway system. If someone follows a sign for Montreal, are they going to stay on interstate-grade roads? That's really the spirit of what I'm getting at.

There's a gap in the extension of I-89, which is planned to be filled in, but I-87 has a full freeway connection.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: thspfc on September 17, 2021, 07:16:00 PM
Two of them on the same sign for the same direction of the same highway: https://www.google.com/maps/@44.4498674,-87.9549305,3a,75y,302.08h,81.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7vjZGVdwafxjXDpakZd_Jg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

Marinette and Sturgeon Bay
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: Bruce on September 17, 2021, 07:17:43 PM
Vancouver BC is not quite served by a freeway-grade connection directly from I-5, since Hwy 99 is an expressway when it crosses into the southern city limit and immediately begins its street section.

I-182 has Walla Walla signed as a control city in a few spots, but obviously doesn't reach that far. US 12 continues there but isn't a full freeway, though one may be built eventually (about half is now expressway-capable).
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: TheHighwayMan3561 on September 17, 2021, 07:26:02 PM
Not a specific city. but Minnesota's closest qualifier is I-35 northbound using "NORTH SHORE" on pull-throughs starting at Cloquet. I-35 ends in Duluth and you continue up the shore on TH 61.

Of course, Duluth is on the North Shore in the strictest sense even as the term generally refers to the areas beyond Duluth, so...
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: Scott5114 on September 17, 2021, 07:45:40 PM
I-70 eastbound's control city is Baltimore, but–
(https://media4.giphy.com/media/3ov9k76r2vMWFg97IA/200.gif?cid=95b27944c3b69ce91598c3f7417a75736d2b2ecda38bb870&rid=200.gif&ct=g)
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: catch22 on September 17, 2021, 07:45:59 PM
At the I-75/I-275 split north of Monroe, Michigan, the control city for I-275 is Flint.

To get to Flint via I-275 from here requires taking I-275 to its end, then I-96 to Brighton then US-23 to Flint.

https://goo.gl/maps/EiZcugPRCHSFeonF6

Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: achilles765 on September 17, 2021, 07:47:51 PM
So would we count Interstate 55 and 59, which both have New Orleans as the southernmost control city even though neither of them actually makes it to the city itself, instead ending at Interstate 10?
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: webny99 on September 17, 2021, 07:55:43 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on September 17, 2021, 07:45:40 PM
I-70 eastbound's control city is Baltimore, but–
[img]

... a Baltimore Beltway-shaped pie comin at you!
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: ilpt4u on September 17, 2021, 07:56:03 PM
Quote from: achilles765 on September 17, 2021, 07:47:51 PM
So would we count Interstate 55 and 59, which both have New Orleans as the southernmost control city even though neither of them actually makes it to the city itself, instead ending at Interstate 10?
No, because you continue onto I-10 to make it to New Orleans

Just like in the OP, I-65 has a NB Control of Chicago, but ends in Gary, IN. But drivers can use either I-94 or I-90 to continue to Chicago and still be on the Interstate System

The question here, is an Interstate Control that is NOT (directly) reachable by going in the direction of the Control via Interstate Highways (regardless of number)
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 17, 2021, 08:08:59 PM
Quote from: ilpt4u on September 17, 2021, 06:37:31 PM
Phoenix on I-515 SB leaving Downtown Las Vegas...at least until US 93 is much further along being upgraded to I-11

Quote from: thspfc on September 17, 2021, 07:16:00 PM
Two of them on the same sign for the same direction of the same highway: https://www.google.com/maps/@44.4498674,-87.9549305,3a,75y,302.08h,81.54t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7vjZGVdwafxjXDpakZd_Jg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

Marinette and Sturgeon Bay

These examples qualify, yet at the same time they are near where the interstate ends so just about any city you would use as a control city is going to qualify.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: ahj2000 on September 17, 2021, 09:49:29 PM
75 not reaching Miami is the first thing that comes into mind for me.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 17, 2021, 09:52:37 PM
Quote from: ahj2000 on September 17, 2021, 09:49:29 PM
75 not reaching Miami is the first thing that comes into mind for me.

But 75 gets you to Miami via other interstates, so not what I'm looking for.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: CoreySamson on September 17, 2021, 09:55:55 PM
What about something like I-69 and Victoria? I-69's future route takes it through there, but it doesn't reach yet.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: vdeane on September 17, 2021, 10:00:34 PM
Quote from: 1 on September 17, 2021, 06:40:32 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on September 17, 2021, 06:38:34 PM
Quote from: 1 on September 17, 2021, 06:14:35 PM
Does Montreal count?

I don't know enough about Canada's highway system. If someone follows a sign for Montreal, are they going to stay on interstate-grade roads? That's really the spirit of what I'm getting at.

There's a gap in the extension of I-89, which is planned to be filled in, but I-87 has a full freeway connection.
Nearly (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.0114492,-73.4522592,3a,77.8y,358.12h,91.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1d4fWWHGTp3ABH_MrnDs0A!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) full freeway (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.4593588,-73.4926335,3a,41.8y,2.42h,94.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s56wxvAmkyPj_UuzA8RA_Fg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

Quote from: cabiness42 on September 17, 2021, 09:52:37 PM
Quote from: ahj2000 on September 17, 2021, 09:49:29 PM
75 not reaching Miami is the first thing that comes into mind for me.

But 75 gets you to Miami via other interstates, so not what I'm looking for.
I would think it would count.  This is at I-75's last junction with another interstate heading south (https://www.google.com/maps/@26.1262337,-80.3637413,3a,73y,111.05h,90.47t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sHEW3zH0D9aXqNqpn8NwUXw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).  It ends north of the Miami city limits.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: NWI_Irish96 on September 17, 2021, 10:05:02 PM
Quote from: vdeane on September 17, 2021, 10:00:34 PM
Quote from: 1 on September 17, 2021, 06:40:32 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on September 17, 2021, 06:38:34 PM
Quote from: 1 on September 17, 2021, 06:14:35 PM
Does Montreal count?

I don't know enough about Canada's highway system. If someone follows a sign for Montreal, are they going to stay on interstate-grade roads? That's really the spirit of what I'm getting at.

There's a gap in the extension of I-89, which is planned to be filled in, but I-87 has a full freeway connection.
Nearly (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.0114492,-73.4522592,3a,77.8y,358.12h,91.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1d4fWWHGTp3ABH_MrnDs0A!2e0!7i16384!8i8192) full freeway (https://www.google.com/maps/@45.4593588,-73.4926335,3a,41.8y,2.42h,94.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s56wxvAmkyPj_UuzA8RA_Fg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).

Quote from: cabiness42 on September 17, 2021, 09:52:37 PM
Quote from: ahj2000 on September 17, 2021, 09:49:29 PM
75 not reaching Miami is the first thing that comes into mind for me.

But 75 gets you to Miami via other interstates, so not what I'm looking for.
I would think it would count.  This is at I-75's last junction with another interstate heading south (https://www.google.com/maps/@26.1262337,-80.3637413,3a,73y,111.05h,90.47t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sHEW3zH0D9aXqNqpn8NwUXw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192).  It ends north of the Miami city limits.

OK, I guess it does count from there. That's weird. Would you really go south on 75 instead of 595 to 95 to get to Miami from there?
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: KCRoadFan on September 17, 2021, 10:08:42 PM
Does I-90 in South Dakota have any distance signs for the state's capital of Pierre? That was the first one that came to mind for me - it's about 20 miles off the interstate on US 83.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: bassoon1986 on September 17, 2021, 10:19:53 PM
Bay St Louis and Pascagoula on I-10 in MS


iPhone
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Techknow on September 17, 2021, 10:28:09 PM
The Bay Area has one. I-880 has Santa Cruz as a control city which makes sense because when I-880 ends the freeway becomes CA-17 which terminates at Santa Cruz. But otherwise you can't get to Santa Cruz from San Jose without going through a windy expressway!

https://www.google.com/maps/@37.3683644,-121.9085393,3a,75y,116.51h,84.51t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMYx1NgrM1QNn7RlwPNSP7A!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Revive 755 on September 17, 2021, 10:51:09 PM
Carthage and Macomb on I-172 in Illinois. (https://goo.gl/maps/5GpXLJGmk6rCHfwC8)
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: milbfan on September 17, 2021, 11:01:27 PM
Ashland, KY/I-64
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: SkyPesos on September 18, 2021, 12:35:47 AM
I-76 WB west of Akron have a control city of Lodi. The interstate ends at I-71, and you have to continue WB on US 224 to get to Lodi.

If the future US 412 interstate between I-35 and I-49 uses Enid as a WB control city, it would be a similar situation as I-76.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: JayhawkCO on September 18, 2021, 03:05:51 AM
There are signs for Boulder on I-270 West, but you can't get there via interstate, only US36.

Chris
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: oscar on September 18, 2021, 06:49:59 AM
In Hawaii, Interstate H-1 has Waianae as a control city. Waianae is well beyond H-1's west end, on non-freeway Hawaii route 93.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: GaryV on September 18, 2021, 07:02:47 AM
Does an unsigned interstate count?

In Grand Rapids the exits from I-196 to unsigned I-296 nb have Cadillac as the control city.

Similarly, I-96 exits to I-296 sb have Kalamazoo.

Of course, it's really just US-131.

Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 08:54:06 AM
Control cities actually don't have to be reached before they change. For Michigan though all control cities are reached via interstate.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 08:55:25 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on September 17, 2021, 07:45:40 PM
I-70 eastbound's control city is Baltimore, but–
(https://media4.giphy.com/media/3ov9k76r2vMWFg97IA/200.gif?cid=95b27944c3b69ce91598c3f7417a75736d2b2ecda38bb870&rid=200.gif&ct=g)
Baltimore is reached via interstate though.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: SkyPesos on September 18, 2021, 09:01:31 AM
Quote from: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 08:55:25 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on September 17, 2021, 07:45:40 PM
I-70 eastbound's control city is Baltimore, but–
(https://media4.giphy.com/media/3ov9k76r2vMWFg97IA/200.gif?cid=95b27944c3b69ce91598c3f7417a75736d2b2ecda38bb870&rid=200.gif&ct=g)
Baltimore is reached via interstate though.
Nah, I-695 and I-95 simply doesn't exist and the only way to get to Baltimore is with the cancelled part of I-70 past the park and ride  :spin:
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 09:17:32 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on September 18, 2021, 09:01:31 AM
Quote from: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 08:55:25 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on September 17, 2021, 07:45:40 PM
I-70 eastbound's control city is Baltimore, but–
(https://media4.giphy.com/media/3ov9k76r2vMWFg97IA/200.gif?cid=95b27944c3b69ce91598c3f7417a75736d2b2ecda38bb870&rid=200.gif&ct=g)
Baltimore is reached via interstate though.
Nah, I-695 and I-95 simply doesn't exist and the only way to get to Baltimore is with the cancelled part of I-70 past the park and ride  :spin:
Lol
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Mapmikey on September 18, 2021, 09:18:33 AM
I-140 in Wilmington has both Shalotte and Myrtle Beach as control cities, only reachable by US 17.

Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: SkyPesos on September 18, 2021, 09:48:04 AM
Quote from: Mapmikey on September 18, 2021, 09:18:33 AM
I-140 in Wilmington has both Shalotte and Myrtle Beach as control cities, only reachable by US 17.
Similar to I-140, would I-526 and the control city of Savannah also count, as you have to use US 17 before I-95 to get there, or not because an interstate is involved between Charleston and Savannah?
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 11:54:11 AM
Quote from: catch22 on September 17, 2021, 07:45:59 PM
At the I-75/I-275 split north of Monroe, Michigan, the control city for I-275 is Flint.

To get to Flint via I-275 from here requires taking I-275 to its end, then I-96 to Brighton then US-23 to Flint.

https://goo.gl/maps/EiZcugPRCHSFeonF6
You can get to Flint taking Interstate's though even if it is a much longer route.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: jp the roadgeek on September 18, 2021, 02:17:18 PM
Cape Cod for I-195 and I-495.  Need to use MA 25 to either US 6 or MA 28 to get there.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via interstate
Post by: GaryV on September 18, 2021, 03:39:35 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 11:54:11 AM
Quote from: catch22 on September 17, 2021, 07:45:59 PM
At the I-75/I-275 split north of Monroe, Michigan, the control city for I-275 is Flint.

To get to Flint via I-275 from here requires taking I-275 to its end, then I-96 to Brighton then US-23 to Flint.

https://goo.gl/maps/EiZcugPRCHSFeonF6
You can get to Flint taking Interstate's though even if it is a much longer route.

If you were going to stay on Interstates to get from Monroe County to Flint, you wouldn't take that I-275 exit.  I mean you could, but from there to Flint it's much shorter staying on I-75 through Detroit than it would be to use I-275 to I-96 through Lansing to I-69 back to Flint.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: jaehak on September 18, 2021, 04:10:48 PM
I 25 never quite makes it into Santa Fe, but it definitely serves it.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 04:53:03 PM
Quote from: GaryV on September 18, 2021, 03:39:35 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 11:54:11 AM
Quote from: catch22 on September 17, 2021, 07:45:59 PM
At the I-75/I-275 split north of Monroe, Michigan, the control city for I-275 is Flint.

To get to Flint via I-275 from here requires taking I-275 to its end, then I-96 to Brighton then US-23 to Flint.

https://goo.gl/maps/EiZcugPRCHSFeonF6
You can get to Flint taking Interstate's though even if it is a much longer route.

If you were going to stay on Interstates to get from Monroe County to Flint, you wouldn't take that I-275 exit.  I mean you could, but from there to Flint it's much shorter staying on I-75 through Detroit than it would be to use I-275 to I-96 through Lansing to I-69 back to Flint.
The whole point is if you take I-275 could you get to Flint using all Interstates? I'd say the answer to that is yes. However Flint is an old control city on the list which probably should be updated. I'd say use Livonia
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Roadsguy on September 18, 2021, 06:18:44 PM
Lancaster is a control city on I-283 southbound from I-83. Not only does I-283 not go anywhere near Lancaster (instead requiring PA 283 to reach it), but Lancaster is the largest city in Pennsylvania not served by any interstate.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: bing101 on September 18, 2021, 10:08:21 PM
I-305 Sacramento Eastbound has a control city of South Lake Tahoe but it is more known as US-50 east to South Lake Tahoe.


South Lake Tahoe has no Interstates.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: roadman65 on September 18, 2021, 10:58:03 PM
Montreal on I-87 North.  You have to use A-15 from the Canadian Border.
Ashland, KY is used on I-64 from Lexington, yet its miles off the freeway.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: bing101 on September 19, 2021, 12:01:40 PM
I-210 west for San Fernando in Pasadena.

Note this was  before Caltrans changed the control city for I-210 west for Sacramento.
Technically San Fernando city limits does not touch the CA-118 a I-210 interchange.
I-580 east has a control city for Fresno but technically Fresno has no interstates for now. One has to drive from I-580 east to I-205 east and CA-120 east and CA-99 south to reach Fresno.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: US 89 on September 19, 2021, 01:32:29 PM
Park City, UT is a control city on a handful of signs for I-80 and US 40. Neither highway reaches the city itself... though 40 comes very close to the eastern limits and historically did go right through town.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: ran4sh on September 19, 2021, 08:19:27 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 08:54:06 AM
Control cities actually don't have to be reached before they change. For Michigan though all control cities are reached via interstate.

But they at least have to be reached before they are absent from signage.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: I-55 on September 19, 2021, 09:36:29 PM
Lockport is used on I-990 yet I-990 ends 8 miles from the city.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: AcE_Wolf_287 on September 20, 2021, 11:55:52 AM
All Around Columbia, Due to I-77 ending here, SB I-77 from around Exit 22 (Killian Road) to the last exit before ending marks as Southbound going to Charleston
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: SkyPesos on September 20, 2021, 12:01:55 PM
Quote from: AcE_Wolf_287 on September 20, 2021, 11:55:52 AM
All Around Columbia, Due to I-77 ending here, SB I-77 from around Exit 22 (Killian Road) to the last exit before ending marks as Southbound going to Charleston
I-26 is an interstate.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: roadfro on September 24, 2021, 01:12:34 AM


Quote from: cabiness42 on September 17, 2021, 08:08:59 PM
Quote from: ilpt4u on September 17, 2021, 06:37:31 PM
Phoenix on I-515 SB leaving Downtown Las Vegas...at least until US 93 is much further along being upgraded to I-11

(second example clipped)

These examples qualify, yet at the same time they are near where the interstate ends so just about any city you would use as a control city is going to qualify.

This example has all the Phoenix signage near the beginning of the route southbound, not the end. Granted I-515 is less than 15 miles long now (and was only about 20-ish miles in length before the south end was rechristened as I-11), so your point is still valid.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: WillWeaverRVA on September 24, 2021, 12:17:45 PM
I-66 is signed for Front Royal, but does not enter the Front Royal corporate limits. Access is by way of non-freeway US 340/US 522 and VA 55.

Also, this is technically cheating, but I-64 uses Colonial Williamsburg as a control city but obviously it does not enter Colonial Williamsburg (or even the City of Williamsburg), and one has to use surface streets to make the connection.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: dvferyance on September 24, 2021, 01:17:03 PM
Quote from: cabiness42 on September 17, 2021, 06:12:43 PM
This is inspired by someone's suggestion that IL 394 be turned into I-394 and I responded that even though part of IL 394 is a freeway, its control city is Danville and people might mistakenly believe that they could take an all-interstate route to Danville by following 394.

This led me to the following question: Is there anyplace in the US where a control city is signed on an interstate but you can't get to that city via interstate by going that direction?

I-65 north doesn't go to Chicago, but you can get to continue to Chicago on interstates, so that doesn't count.

I-69 north at Bloomington has a control city of Indianapolis, but if you head north you have to leave the interstate system to get there.

However, this is only a temporary situation as the rest of I-69 has construction either underway or planned to start soon.

Is there a more permanent example anywhere?
I-80 doesn't go to Chicago either but you can still get there by another interstate. I thought this thread was an interstate control city that could not be reached by any interstate. Any is the key not an interstate control city that can only be reached by another interstate.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Flint1979 on September 24, 2021, 03:13:50 PM
Quote from: ran4sh on September 19, 2021, 08:19:27 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 08:54:06 AM
Control cities actually don't have to be reached before they change. For Michigan though all control cities are reached via interstate.

But they at least have to be reached before they are absent from signage.
Which control city in Michigan is absent before it's reached?
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: plain on September 24, 2021, 03:18:28 PM
Annapolis
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: ilpt4u on September 25, 2021, 11:50:06 AM
Quote from: plain on September 24, 2021, 03:18:28 PM
Annapolis
I-595 isn't signed in Maryland, but it is certainly a thing, and it makes it to Annapolis, so that is a "Nope!"
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: plain on September 25, 2021, 11:52:38 AM
Quote from: ilpt4u on September 25, 2021, 11:50:06 AM
Quote from: plain on September 24, 2021, 03:18:28 PM
Annapolis
I-595 isn't signed in Maryland, but it is certainly a thing, and it makes it to Annapolis, so that is a "Nope!"

Didn't think it made it but I was referring to I-97...
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: ilpt4u on September 25, 2021, 11:56:41 AM
Quote from: plain on September 25, 2021, 11:52:38 AM
Quote from: ilpt4u on September 25, 2021, 11:50:06 AM
Quote from: plain on September 24, 2021, 03:18:28 PM
Annapolis
I-595 isn't signed in Maryland, but it is certainly a thing, and it makes it to Annapolis, so that is a "Nope!"

Didn't think it made it but I was referring to I-97...
https://www.interstate-guide.com/i-595-md/
Quote from: interstate-guide.com
I-595 in Maryland is the longest unsigned route within the Interstate Highway System. Aligned entirely along U.S. 50 (John Hanson Highway) and partially along U.S. 301, I-595 follows John Hanson Highway between I-95/495 (Capital Beltway) and MD 70 at Annapolis.
According to interstate-guide.com, I-595 makes it to MD 70 in Annapolis. And since one can continue from the southern terminus of I-97 onto Hidden I-595 to reach Annapolis, Annapolis is reachable via Interstate Highway from I-97
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: SEWIGuy on September 25, 2021, 12:02:09 PM
In the Green Bay Area, Marinette is used as a control city for I-41 north.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Flint1979 on September 25, 2021, 12:03:11 PM
The hidden I-595 does make it to Annapolis but does it really enter it?
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: ilpt4u on September 25, 2021, 12:07:30 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on September 25, 2021, 12:03:11 PM
The hidden I-595 does make it to Annapolis but does it really enter it?
Assuming the Google Maps Annapolis boundries are the real municipal boundries, yes part of I-595 is in Annapolis - not very much, but a little bit
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: Flint1979 on September 25, 2021, 08:19:56 PM
Quote from: ilpt4u on September 25, 2021, 12:07:30 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on September 25, 2021, 12:03:11 PM
The hidden I-595 does make it to Annapolis but does it really enter it?
Assuming the Google Maps Annapolis boundries are the real municipal boundries, yes part of I-595 is in Annapolis - not very much, but a little bit
It looks like it just barely enters Annapolis.
Title: Re: Interstate control cities that can't be reached via *ANY* interstate
Post by: HighwayStar on September 26, 2021, 02:12:37 PM
Quote from: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 09:17:32 AM
Quote from: SkyPesos on September 18, 2021, 09:01:31 AM
Quote from: Flint1979 on September 18, 2021, 08:55:25 AM
Quote from: Scott5114 on September 17, 2021, 07:45:40 PM
I-70 eastbound's control city is Baltimore, but–
(https://media4.giphy.com/media/3ov9k76r2vMWFg97IA/200.gif?cid=95b27944c3b69ce91598c3f7417a75736d2b2ecda38bb870&rid=200.gif&ct=g)
Baltimore is reached via interstate though.
Nah, I-695 and I-95 simply doesn't exist and the only way to get to Baltimore is with the cancelled part of I-70 past the park and ride  :spin:
Lol

Someone summoned me it seems...
Actually, even the wording of the topic seemed to have the Baltimore, DC, etc. type problem in mind, hence the allowance for *Any* interstate.