AARoads Forum

National Boards => General Highway Talk => Topic started by: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM

Title: numbering question
Post by: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: oscar on December 15, 2021, 07:23:09 PM
^ Because those states' DOTs maintain lots of minor routes that in other states would be county or municipal routes.

Virginia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania have state-maintained secondary route systems. Virginia's secondary route numbers go into five digits, and the other states' numbers go into four digits. However, the secondary routes are signed differently from primary routes.

Hawaii has a few routes, signed like all the others, with four-digit numbers (highest is 8930). However, the state maintains only a few hundred routes, so unlike Kentucky and Louisiana it isn't a route number shortage that explains Hawaii's four-digit route numbers.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: formulanone on December 15, 2021, 07:39:07 PM
Texas also has numerous Farm-to-Market and Ranch-to-Market Roads up to the 3500s.

Some scattered counties also post four-digit routes, but with varying numbering patterns.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Scott5114 on December 15, 2021, 07:51:27 PM
Of course, the reason the FM/RM numbers get so high is because Texas is a huge state, so it would be impossible to maintain a statewide route system with only three digits without duplication.

North and South Dakota and New Mexico each have a few four-digit route numbers chosen for commemorative purposes: ND/SD 1804 and 1806 (which flank the Missouri River and are numbered after the dates of the Lewis and Clark expeditions), NM 1113 (a former CR 113 turned state road; presumably NM 113 was already in use), former NM 2001 (serving the New Mexico Space History Museum in Alamogordo), NM 6563 (serving the solar observatory near Cloudcroft, which uses a wavelength with frequency 6563 Ã... in their work). New Mexico also has a NM 5001 for no good reason.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Max Rockatansky on December 15, 2021, 08:07:07 PM
Florida has a couple like 9336.  That came to be because much of the 9XX grid had already been used up when they decided to renumber FL 27.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: LilianaUwU on December 15, 2021, 08:12:13 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on December 15, 2021, 07:51:27 PM
Of course, the reason the FM/RM numbers get so high is because Texas is a huge state, so it would be impossible to maintain a statewide route system with only three digits without duplication.

And even then, they keep duplicating numbers between their systems, so imagine if they only had three numbers to work with.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: oscar on December 15, 2021, 08:44:57 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on December 15, 2021, 07:51:27 PM
New Mexico also has a NM 5001 for no good reason.

US 64 was rerouted around downtown Farmington, over NM 5001, with the old route becoming business US 64. 5001 is now unsigned, if it ever was signed.

Puerto Rico has a few dozen four-digit routes up to 9991, in the third tier of the Commonwealth's highway system (the tiers are signed differently).
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: SkyPesos on December 15, 2021, 08:59:48 PM
Same reason why Missouri and Wisconsin are the only two states with a statewide system of signed letter routes.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Dirt Roads on December 15, 2021, 09:22:46 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?

On the other hand, you could've asked why West Virginia is the only state with route numbers that go into the thousandths.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: sernum on December 16, 2021, 03:54:38 PM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 15, 2021, 09:22:46 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?

On the other hand, you could've asked why West Virginia is the only state with route numbers that go into the thousandths.
decimals???
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: formulanone on December 16, 2021, 04:03:30 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 16, 2021, 03:54:38 PM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 15, 2021, 09:22:46 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?
On the other hand, you could've asked why West Virginia is the only state with route numbers that go into the thousandths.
decimals???


They use "fractional" routes, though they're just the numbered sequence of a route that branched off its parent route. For example, this is the twentieth route from a county line off of US 60:

(https://live.staticflickr.com/2829/33832303966_d6fe7dbda9_w.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/TxDpgC)

It's not the 60/20th route.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Max Rockatansky on December 16, 2021, 04:07:43 PM
Quote from: formulanone on December 16, 2021, 04:03:30 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 16, 2021, 03:54:38 PM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 15, 2021, 09:22:46 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?
On the other hand, you could've asked why West Virginia is the only state with route numbers that go into the thousandths.
decimals???


They use "fractional" routes, though they're just the numbered sequence of a route that branched off its parent route. For example, this is the twentieth route from a county line from US 60:

(https://live.staticflickr.com/2829/33832303966_d6fe7dbda9_w.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/TxDpgC)

It's not the 60/20th route.

I always thought it was odd that they just didn't designate the Spurs with letters like the National Forest Service does.  Example; 60/20 could be 60T.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Mapmikey on December 16, 2021, 04:27:50 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 16, 2021, 04:07:43 PM
Quote from: formulanone on December 16, 2021, 04:03:30 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 16, 2021, 03:54:38 PM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 15, 2021, 09:22:46 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?
On the other hand, you could've asked why West Virginia is the only state with route numbers that go into the thousandths.
decimals???


They use "fractional" routes, though they're just the numbered sequence of a route that branched off its parent route. For example, this is the twentieth route from a county line from US 60:

(https://live.staticflickr.com/2829/33832303966_d6fe7dbda9_w.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/TxDpgC)

It's not the 60/20th route.

I always thought it was odd that they just didn't designate the Spurs with letters like the National Forest Service does.  Example; 60/20 could be 60T.

This would be impractical as some spurs go way beyond 26 of them and in fact some counties have so many they change the numerator to 2xx to keep from using >100 in the denominator.

South Carolina also has posted state-maintained secondary numbers that exceed 1000 in most counties.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Max Rockatansky on December 16, 2021, 04:32:29 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on December 16, 2021, 04:27:50 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 16, 2021, 04:07:43 PM
Quote from: formulanone on December 16, 2021, 04:03:30 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 16, 2021, 03:54:38 PM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 15, 2021, 09:22:46 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?
On the other hand, you could've asked why West Virginia is the only state with route numbers that go into the thousandths.
decimals???


They use "fractional" routes, though they're just the numbered sequence of a route that branched off its parent route. For example, this is the twentieth route from a county line from US 60:

(https://live.staticflickr.com/2829/33832303966_d6fe7dbda9_w.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/TxDpgC)

It's not the 60/20th route.

I always thought it was odd that they just didn't designate the Spurs with letters like the National Forest Service does.  Example; 60/20 could be 60T.

This would be impractical as some spurs go way beyond 26 of them and in fact some counties have so many they change the numerator to 2xx to keep from using >100 in the denominator

It would be easy, if it does go to the 27th spur do something like "60AA."  
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Dirt Roads on December 16, 2021, 05:27:47 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?

Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 15, 2021, 09:22:46 PM
On the other hand, you could've asked why West Virginia is the only state with route numbers that go into the thousandths.

Quote from: sernum on December 16, 2021, 03:54:38 PM
decimals???

If only we could do the math...
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Mapmikey on December 16, 2021, 07:07:54 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 16, 2021, 04:32:29 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on December 16, 2021, 04:27:50 PM
Quote from: Max Rockatansky on December 16, 2021, 04:07:43 PM
Quote from: formulanone on December 16, 2021, 04:03:30 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 16, 2021, 03:54:38 PM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 15, 2021, 09:22:46 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?
On the other hand, you could've asked why West Virginia is the only state with route numbers that go into the thousandths.
decimals???


They use "fractional" routes, though they're just the numbered sequence of a route that branched off its parent route. For example, this is the twentieth route from a county line from US 60:

(https://live.staticflickr.com/2829/33832303966_d6fe7dbda9_w.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/TxDpgC)

It's not the 60/20th route.

I always thought it was odd that they just didn't designate the Spurs with letters like the National Forest Service does.  Example; 60/20 could be 60T.

This would be impractical as some spurs go way beyond 26 of them and in fact some counties have so many they change the numerator to 2xx to keep from using >100 in the denominator

It would be easy, if it does go to the 27th spur do something like "60AA."  

Right...but the 90th spur requires 4 letters for a 6 or 7 character designation.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: hotdogPi on December 16, 2021, 07:13:54 PM
Quote from: Mapmikey on December 16, 2021, 07:07:54 PM
Right...but the 90th spur requires 4 letters for a 6 or 7 character designation.

No, it would be 60CL.




How about 60😶, 60💾, and 60🛵?
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Scott5114 on December 16, 2021, 07:22:08 PM
Assuming you use all 26 letters, two letters gives you 26×26=676 additional possible combinations. If you go to three letters you get 26×26×26=17,576 more combinations.

Obviously, not using certain letters because of potential readability issues reduces the number of combinations. Missouri doesn't use G, I, L, Q, S, or X, meaning there are theoretically 420 letter routes available to each county (20 single-letter routes + 20×20 = 400 two-letter routes). Functionally, it's rare that a county uses all 20 of the single-letter routes, the 20 double-letter routes, and the 19 remaining A* routes.

Quote from: 1 on December 16, 2021, 07:13:54 PM
How about 60😶, 60💾, and 60🛵?

Unicode currently defines 144,697 characters, so if you allow two of any Unicode character to be used, you could have 20,937,221,809 possible spurs. (Functionally some of these would be useless, though, since they're things like non-breaking spaces, various forms of punctuation and diacritics, Cyrillic and Greek characters that look more or less like Latin ones, etc.)
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Dirt Roads on December 16, 2021, 10:50:22 PM
Curiosities in the West Virginia "fractional" route numbering:

The highest denominator that I can find is 19/96 in Little Birch (Braxton County).

The "biggest" number (most digits with highest numerator) that I can find is CR-119/95 in Anchor (Boone County).

Some counties have a prevalence of "fractionals" with single digits in both the numerator and denominator.  The is certainly the case in northern Braxton County.  This only occurs when the single digit county routes are more important than the two-digit county routes.

Some "fractional" route numbers cross back-and-forth across county lines.  In general, if the route returns to the originating county the number stays consistent.  WVDOH grays out the route shields on the county maps when the routes are not in the originating county.

Multiplexes of US routes and state routes (both current and former) can create some interesting "fractionals".  There are a bunch of 19/X, 21/X, 16/X and 61/X routes interspersed in Fayette County between Mount Hope and Oak Hill.

Sometimes the county routes and their "fractionals" are clustered together.  An interesting twist is the cluster of 21 (21/X), 22 (22/X), 24 (24/X), 28 (28/X) and 29 (29/X) in northern Kanawha County.  Of course, LSR-21 is the former US-21.  (As best as I can tell, the designation LSR means "long secondary route" where the designation crosses multiple county lines).

Mapmikey pointed out that sometimes WVDOH increases the numerator in order to reduce the number of branches off a major route such as US-60.  There are a bunch of 160/X "fractional" routes in West Huntington, Pea Ridge and Barboursville (Cabell County).  Fun fact:  When this happens along US-119 in Kanawha County, the overflow "fractionals" are numbered 219/X (which are nowhere near US-219).  When this occurs along US-19 in Raleigh County, the overflow "fractionals" are numbered 119/X (which are closer to US-119 but not quite). 

Occasionally, this happens off of state routes.  There are a bunch of 103/X routes in Raleigh County along WV-3.

Curiously, there are lots of "fractional" routes numbered after the Interstate routes.  There are so many 64/X routes in Cabell County that the series extends to 164/X.  CR-64/99 is located in the East Pea Ridge section.  Some of the 64/X routes are actually south of US-60 (which is south of I-64 in the area west of the 29th Street East exit (Exit 15).  There are also some 81/X routes in Berkeley County.

There are some new numerators interleaved with old numerators.  For instance, there is a prevalence of 17/X interspersed with 119/X in southern Boone County.  Interestingly, WVDOH shows the old numerators (in this case, 119/X) route shields grayed out on the county maps.  WV-17 replaced US-119 after the latter was relocated onto Corridor G.

West Virginia also has "fractionals" for the HARP numbering (Home Access Road Program).  These all seem to be in lower 900s for the numerator, and the highest denominator was 902/99 in Cherry Run (Berkeley County).  Interestingly, there are no branch routes for WV-901 in the county road "fractionals".

Since I was unable to find any consolidation of route listings, I got all of this from county maps.  It is likely that this information is incomplete and incorrect.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: hbelkins on December 17, 2021, 10:21:38 AM
^^^

There are some 252 numerators in Mingo County. In fact, I think the entire old routing of US 52 (where the new construction runs along the ridgetop between WV 65 and the new WV 44 connector) has a 252-numerator number.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: skluth on December 17, 2021, 05:03:58 PM
Quote from: Scott5114 on December 16, 2021, 07:22:08 PM
Assuming you use all 26 letters, two letters gives you 26×26=676 additional possible combinations. If you go to three letters you get 26×26×26=17,576 more combinations.

Obviously, not using certain letters because of potential readability issues reduces the number of combinations. Missouri doesn't use G, I, L, Q, S, or X, meaning there are theoretically 420 letter routes available to each county (20 single-letter routes + 20×20 = 400 two-letter routes). Functionally, it's rare that a county uses all 20 of the single-letter routes, the 20 double-letter routes, and the 19 remaining A* routes.

There are some double-letter combos that need to be avoided for other reasons. I doubt many businesses would want to be located on CTH FU.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: JayhawkCO on December 17, 2021, 05:06:08 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?

They're not.  North Dakota has two -- ND1804 and ND1806.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: 74/171FAN on December 17, 2021, 05:19:35 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on December 17, 2021, 05:06:08 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?

They're not.  North Dakota has two -- ND1804 and ND1806.

Fairfax County, VA, has secondary route numbers in the 10000s.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: JayhawkCO on December 17, 2021, 05:24:31 PM
Quote from: 74/171FAN on December 17, 2021, 05:19:35 PM
Quote from: jayhawkco on December 17, 2021, 05:06:08 PM
Quote from: sernum on December 15, 2021, 07:10:02 PM
why are Kentucky and Louisiana the only two states with routes numbers that go into the thousands?

They're not.  North Dakota has two -- ND1804 and ND1806.

Fairfax County, VA, has secondary route numbers in the 10000s.

This I know, but North Dakota has two that are primary.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Dirt Roads on December 17, 2021, 09:16:46 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on December 17, 2021, 10:21:38 AM
^^^
There are some 252 numerators in Mingo County. In fact, I think the entire old routing of US 52 (where the new construction runs along the ridgetop between WV 65 and the new WV 44 connector) has a 252-numerator number.

That's interesting, because there are no 152/X routes in Mingo County.  I suspect that is related to WV-152 in Wayne County next door.  It looks like Wayne County consistently has 152/X routes branching off of WV-152 (old US-52), and 252/X routes branching off of the Tolsia Highway (new US-52).
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Bitmapped on December 17, 2021, 11:04:05 PM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 16, 2021, 10:50:22 PM
Curiosities in the West Virginia "fractional" route numbering:

The highest denominator that I can find is 19/96 in Little Birch (Braxton County).

The "biggest" number (most digits with highest numerator) that I can find is CR-119/95 in Anchor (Boone County).

Some counties have a prevalence of "fractionals" with single digits in both the numerator and denominator.  The is certainly the case in northern Braxton County.  This only occurs when the single digit county routes are more important than the two-digit county routes.
It's pretty common to have the denominators be in single digits. It's normally only with US route or state route parents that they are long enough to get more than a handful of children.

WVDOH normally starts laying out CR 1 in the northwest corner and works south/east from there, so a county route numbering having a lower digit doesn't inherently mean it's more important than another. Same thing goes with fractions - at least originally, they started in the north/west end of a route but there tends to be a lot of in-fill as roads have been added.

Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 16, 2021, 10:50:22 PM

Some "fractional" route numbers cross back-and-forth across county lines.  In general, if the route returns to the originating county the number stays consistent.  WVDOH grays out the route shields on the county maps when the routes are not in the originating county.
Are you referring to roads that ride along ridgeline? In that case, DOH assigns the entire section of road to one county or the other. It gets that county's designation and is maintained by that county's garage. This also happens with some roads that bounce along the WV/VA state line and leads to interesting things like WV maintaining part of WV 161 that dips into Virginia at Bishop.

Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 16, 2021, 10:50:22 PM
Curiously, there are lots of "fractional" routes numbered after the Interstate routes.  There are so many 64/X routes in Cabell County that the series extends to 164/X.  CR-64/99 is located in the East Pea Ridge section.  Some of the 64/X routes are actually south of US-60 (which is south of I-64 in the area west of the 29th Street East exit (Exit 15).  There are also some 81/X routes in Berkeley County.
The 64/x series in Cabell County seems to be routes that split off of some CR 60/x. I'm not sure that the numbering has anything to do with I-64 as these routes are directly associated with the Interstate like you would expect.

In Monongalia County, the 68/x series of numbers has nothing to do with I-68. There was originally a CR 68, now numbered as CR 68/7 to avoid conflicting with the Interstate. The 68/x series is children of that route.

Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 16, 2021, 10:50:22 PM
There are some new numerators interleaved with old numerators.  For instance, there is a prevalence of 17/X interspersed with 119/X in southern Boone County.  Interestingly, WVDOH shows the old numerators (in this case, 119/X) route shields grayed out on the county maps.  WV-17 replaced US-119 after the latter was relocated onto Corridor G.

DOH rarely renumbers routes. If a new route is created, or there is some need to renumber like due to an abandonment or truncation, a new number will be assigned with the new parent route's numerator. Otherwise, the old parent numerator sticks around.

The greyed out routes on the Boone County map are located in Logan County. Boone County numbers, both 17/x and 119/x, are in black on the Boone County map.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Dirt Roads on December 18, 2021, 10:00:22 AM
Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 16, 2021, 10:50:22 PM
Some counties have a prevalence of "fractionals" with single digits in both the numerator and denominator.  The is certainly the case in northern Braxton County.  This only occurs when the single digit county routes are more important than the two-digit county routes.

Quote from: Bitmapped on December 17, 2021, 11:04:05 PM
It's pretty common to have the denominators be in single digits. It's normally only with US route or state route parents that they are long enough to get more than a handful of children.

Most certainly.  I'd be surprised if there are any counties that don't use up all of the single digits.  But for some reason, there are very few counties where a large percentage of roads are single digits in both the numerator and denominator.  Braxton County doesn't have a lot of short branches that are maintained by the state anymore.  And many of these X/X routes are longer roads that would not be numbered as "fractionals" in more populated counties.



Quote from: Dirt Roads on December 16, 2021, 10:50:22 PM
Some "fractional" route numbers cross back-and-forth across county lines.  In general, if the route returns to the originating county the number stays consistent.  WVDOH grays out the route shields on the county maps when the routes are not in the originating county.

Quote from: Bitmapped on December 17, 2021, 11:04:05 PM
Are you referring to roads that ride along ridgeline? In that case, DOH assigns the entire section of road to one county or the other. It gets that county's designation and is maintained by that county's garage. This also happens with some roads that bounce along the WV/VA state line and leads to interesting things like WV maintaining part of WV 161 that dips into Virginia at Bishop.

Exactly that.


Quote from: Bitmapped on December 17, 2021, 11:04:05 PM
The greyed out routes on the Boone County map are located in Logan County. Boone County numbers, both 17/x and 119/x, are in black on the Boone County map.

I see that now.  It looked like CR-119/19 crossed over into Coal Valley from Logan County.  But if I look more carefully, I think the map is trying to indicate that the route number changes to CR-28/2 once it crosses into Boone County.  That looks like the only grayed out number along WV-17 in Boone County.
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: hbelkins on December 18, 2021, 06:24:35 PM
Speaking of WV 17, has its official southwestern terminus been moved now that it ends on the former WV 10?
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Mapmikey on December 18, 2021, 07:18:32 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on December 18, 2021, 06:24:35 PM
Speaking of WV 17, has its official southwestern terminus been moved now that it ends on the former WV 10?

Aug 2021 GMSV shows old WV 10 north to Logan clearly signed as CR 210/25.

If the CO orders are still on the WVDOT website I cannot locate them.  My recollection is that WV 17 is supposed to be extended across to the new WV 10 someday...
Title: Re: numbering question
Post by: Bitmapped on December 19, 2021, 10:51:05 AM
Quote from: Mapmikey on December 18, 2021, 07:18:32 PM
Quote from: hbelkins on December 18, 2021, 06:24:35 PM
Speaking of WV 17, has its official southwestern terminus been moved now that it ends on the former WV 10?

Aug 2021 GMSV shows old WV 10 north to Logan clearly signed as CR 210/25.

If the CO orders are still on the WVDOT website I cannot locate them.  My recollection is that WV 17 is supposed to be extended across to the new WV 10 someday...

August 2021 GMSV actually still shows WV 10 signed on its old route in Stollings around WV 17, like at https://goo.gl/maps/PNZ8SAx4gQRm2Hv26 and https://goo.gl/maps/WKPBC8VHeiUyUxwG7